DOCSLIB.ORG

8Th, Grand and Hope Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8Th, Grand and Hope Project 8th, Grand and Hope Project Case Number: ENV-2017-506-EIR Project Location: 754 South Hope Street; 609 and 625 West 8th Street, Los Angeles, California 90017 Community Plan Area: Central City Council District: 14—Huizar Project Description: The Project proposes to develop a 45-story mixed-use building on an approximately 36,178-square-foot (0.83-acre) site located within the Central City Community Plan Area of the City of Los Angeles (City). The Project would consist of 547 residential dwelling units, up to 7,499 square feet of ground floor commercial/retail/restaurant space, and 37,216 square feet dedicated to a charter school for grades K–5 (hereinafter referred to as the Project). The Project would provide a maximum of 562,696 square feet of floor area with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 9.37:1. In addition, the Project includes an option wherein an additional 33 residential units may be constructed in lieu of the school use, resulting in a total of 580 residential units for the option. Under this scenario in which the school is not developed, a maximum of 556,459 square feet of floor area would be developed with a total FAR of 9.27:1. The Project would also include three subterranean levels to a maximum depth of 63 feet below ground level. With 45 stories, the building would have a maximum height of 592 feet above ground level. The parking would be provided in three subterranean levels and on four levels above the street level uses. To accommodate the Project, an existing surface parking lot and four-level parking structure would be demolished. PREPARED FOR: The City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning PREPARED BY: Eyestone Environmental, LLC APPLICANT: Mitsui Fudosan America May 2019 INITIAL STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of an Initial Study ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Organization of the Initial Study ............................................................................................. 2 1.3 CEQA Process ....................................................................................................................... 2 2. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 3. Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Description of Project ........................................................................................................... 14 3.4 Requested Permits and Approvals ...................................................................................... 30 4. Environmental Impact Analysis .................................................................................................. 32 I. Aesthetics ....................................................................................................................... 32 II. Agriculture and Forest Resources................................................................................... 38 III. Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 40 IV. Biological Resources ...................................................................................................... 42 V. Cultural Resources.......................................................................................................... 46 VI. Energy ............................................................................................................................. 48 VII. Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................... 49 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................... 55 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................. 56 X. Hydrology and Water Quality .......................................................................................... 61 XI. Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................... 67 XII. Mineral Resources .......................................................................................................... 68 XIII. Noise ............................................................................................................................... 69 XIV. Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 70 XV. Public Services................................................................................................................ 72 XVI. Recreation ....................................................................................................................... 77 XVII. Transportation ................................................................................................................. 78 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................................ 79 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems .......................................................................................... 81 XX. Wildfire ............................................................................................................................ 87 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................................ 89 8th, Grand and Hope Page i City of Los Angeles Initial Study May 2019 Appendices Appendix IS-1 Shadow Studies Appendix IS-2 Native Tree Protection Report Appendix IS-3 South Central Coastal Information Center Records Search Results Appendix IS-4 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Appendix IS-5 Paleontological Resources Records Search Results Appendix IS-6 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Phase II Screening Subsurface Assessment Appendix IS-7 Hydrology and Water Quality Technical Memorandum Appendix IS-8 Utility Technical Memorandum 8th, Grand and Hope Page ii City of Los Angeles Initial Study May 2019 List of Figures Page Figure 1 Project Location Map ....................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2 Location of Project Site within a Transit Priority Area ......................................................11 Figure 3 Aerial Photograph of the Project Vicinity .......................................................................... 13 Figure 4 Conceptual Site Plan ....................................................................................................... 16 Figure 5 Site Plan—Level 1 (Ground Level) ..................................................................................17 Figure 6 Building Section Looking North ........................................................................................ 18 Figure 7 Building Section Looking East ......................................................................................... 19 Figure 8 Conceptual Rendering—View from Southwest ................................................................20 Figure 9 Open Space and Recreational Amenities—Level 5 .........................................................22 Figure 10 Open Space and Recreational Amenities—Levels 6 and 7 (Layered) ............................. 23 Figure 11 Open Space and Recreational Amenities—Level 17 .......................................................24 Figure 12 Open Space and Recreational Amenities—Level 31 .......................................................25 Figure 13 Open Space and Recreational Amenities—Level 44 .......................................................26 8th, Grand and Hope Page iii City of Los Angeles Initial Study May 2019 List of Tables Page Table 1 Summary of Proposed Floor Area ...................................................................................15 Table 2 Summary of Proposed Parking ........................................................................................28 Table 3 LAMC Section 12.21-G—Open Space Required and Provided by the School Option .............................................................................................................................. 74 Table 4 LAMC Section 12.21-G—Open Space Required and Provided by the No School Option .................................................................................................................. 76 Table 5 Estimated Project Solid Waste Generation ......................................................................86 8th, Grand and Hope Page iv City of Los Angeles Initial Study May 2019 INITIAL STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION An application for the proposed 8th, Grand and Hope Project (“Project”) has been submitted to the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning for discretionary review. The Department of City Planning, as Lead Agency, has determined that the project is subject to the California Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (818) 756-7876 Branford Recreation Cente
    SITE ADDRESS TELEPHONE West Valley Winnetka Recreation Center 8401 Winnetka Ave., Canoga Park 91306 (818) 756-7876 Mid Valley Branford Recreation Center 13306 Branford Street 91331 (818) 893-4923 Delano Recreation Center 15100 Erwin Street, Van Nuys 91411 (818) 756-8529 Fernangeles Recreation Center 8851 Laurel Canyon Blvd., Sun Valley 91352 (818) 767-4171 Panorama Recreation Center 8600 Hazeltine Avenue 91402 (818) 893-3401 Sepulveda Recreation Center 8801 Kester Avenue 91402 (818) 893-3700 Valley Plaza Recreation Center 12240 Archwood St. 91606 (818)765-5885 Victory-Vineland Recreation Ctr 11117 Victory Blvd., N. Hollywood 91606 (818) 985-9516 North Valley Hubert Humphrey Recreation Ctr 12560 Fillmore St., Pacoima 91331 (818) 896-6215 Sunland Recreation Center 8651 Foothill Blvd., Sunland 91040 (818) 352-5282 Sylmar Park Recreation Center 13109 Borden Avenue., Sylmar 91342 (818) 367-5656 Richie Valens Recreation Center 10736 Laurel Canyon Blvd. 91331 (818)834-5172 Sun Valley Recreation Center 8133 Vineland Ave. 91352 (818)767-6151 David M. Gonzales Recreation Center 10943 Herrick Ave. 91331 (818)899-1950 South Valley North Hollywood Recreation Center 11430 Chandler Boulevard 91601 (818)763-7651 Reseda Recreation Center 18411 Victory Blvd. 91335 (818)881-3882 Lanark Recreation Center 21816 Lanark St. 91304 (818-883-1503 North East Cypress Recreation Center 2630 Pepper Avenue 90065 (213) 485-5384 Eagle Rock Recreation Center 1100 Eagle Vista Drive 90041 (323) 257-6948 El Sereno Recreation Center 4721 Klamath Street 90032 (323) 225-3517 Evergreen Recreation Center 2844 E. 2nd Street 90033 (323) 262-0397 Glassell Park Recreation Center 3650 Verdugo Road 90065 (323) 341-5681 Hazard Recreation Center 2230 Norfolk Street 90033 (213) 485-6839 Highland Park Recreation Center 6150 Piedmont Avenue 90042 (213) 847-4875 Lincoln Park Recreation Center 3501 Valley Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • March 13, 2015 To: Honorable Council Members
    FORM GEN. 160 (Rev. 6-80) CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE Date: March 13, 2015 To: Honorable Council Members From: Gary Lee Moore, City Engineer Bureau of Engineering Subject: CITY SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM STATUS UPDATE NO. 1 (COUNCIL FILE 14-0163-S4) This document is prepared in response to the CF 14-0163-S4 relative to the City Sidewalk Repair Program. Specifically, Council instructed the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) to report back on the status of implementation of the Sidewalk Repair Program, including any required policies, hiring of employees, utilization of contractors and amount of sidewalk repairs completed. Program Progress On February 3, 2015, the City Council approved implementation of a FY 2014-2015 Sidewalk Repair Program for repair of sidewalks adjacent to City facilities. BOE was established as the Program Manager. A kickoff meeting was held on February 9, 2015, and subsequent meetings have been held on a weekly basis. The meetings are well attended and include the Mayor’s Office, Board of Public Works (BPW), Bureau of Contract Administration (BCA), Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL), Bureau of Street Services (BSS), City Administrative Officer (CAO), Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). BOE appreciates the participation and collaborative efforts that have taken place to start the Program, and the cooperation has allowed us to accomplish a great deal in a relatively short time frame. On February 10, 2015, BOE immediately began assessment of the list of City Facilities that were provided by each Department as requested by the CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDE to HEART of LA | | Street Food Cinema Pure Cycles REI Skanska Celebrating UCLA 100 Years Socaltemple Gas | Strava Tern Bicycles | Thousand
    LOCAL GEMS ALONG AND NEAR THE ROUTE 1 MacArthur Park 4 Los Angeles City Hall 7 Japanese American National 7th St and Alvarado St 200 N Spring St Museum (JANM) The MacArthur Park hub itself sports a beautiful Towering at 32 floors is the 91-year-old center 100 N Central Ave urban park, with scattered memorials (including of LA government. Fun fact: The concrete JANM covers 130 years of Japanese American one to the eponymous General MacArthur), in its tower was made with sand from each of history. In front sits Oomo Cube, a Rubik’s sculptures, recreation centers, a fountain, and California‘s 58 counties and water from its Cube sculpture with photographic panels and a massive lake fed by natural springs. It’s also 21 historic missions. internal lighting. Artist Nicole Maloney used home to Levitt Pavilion, the public space that the OOMO shorthand for “Out of Many, One.” hosts 50 free outdoor concerts every year. 5 Hall of Justice On October 6, the museum is hosting its free 211 W Temple St 11th Annual Kokoro Craft Boutique. 2 The Spring Arcade The Hall of Justice is the oldest surviving 541 S Spring St government building in the LA Civic Center. 8 4th Street Viaduct The Spring Arcade, publicized as a “city within In front (visible just down Temple Street) is This art deco bridge was designed by longtime a city” when it opened in 1925, is now a dining Embodied, a bronze statue described by artist LA City Engineer Merrill Butler and built in destination with restaurants like the Cantonese Alison Saar as a “figure of grace and virtue to 1931.
    [Show full text]
  • 1048 S Los Angeles Street Is Located Less Than Three Miles from the Ferrante, a Massive 1,500-Unit Construction Project, Scheduled for Completion in 2021
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM A Signalized Corner Mixed-Use Retail and Office Property Ideally located in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles in the Iconic Fashion District brandonmichaelsgroup.com INVESTMENT ADVISORS Brandon Michaels Senior Managing Director of Investments Senior Director, National Retail Group Tel: 818.212-2794 [email protected] CA License: 01434685 Matthew Luchs First Vice President Investments COO of The Brandon Michaels Group Tel: 818.212.2727 [email protected] CA License: 01948233 Ben Brownstein Senior Investment Associate National Retail Group National Industrial Properties Group Tel: 818.212.2812 [email protected] CA License: 02012808 Contents 04 Executive Summary 10 Property Overview 16 Area Overview 28 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Executive Summary 4 1048 S. Los Angeles St The Offering A Signalized Corner Mixed-Use Retail and Office Property Ideally located in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles in the Iconic Fashion District The Brandon Michaels Group of Marcus & Millichap has been selected to exclusively represent for sale 1048 South Los Angeles Street, a two-story multi-tenant mixed-use retail and office property ideally located on the Northeast signalized corner of Los Angeles Street and East 11th Street. The property is comprised of 15 rental units, with eight retail units on the ground floor, and seven office units on the second story. 1048 South Los Angeles Street is to undergo a $170 million renovation. currently 86% occupied. Three units are The property is located in the heart of vacant, one of which is on the ground the iconic fashion district of Downtown floor, and two of which are on the Los Angeles, which is home to over second story.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii. Environmental Setting
    III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This Section provides a brief overview of the Project Site’s regional and local setting. Additional descriptions of the environmental setting as it relates to each of the environmental issues analyzed in this EIR are included in the environmental setting discussions contained within Sections IV.A through IV.N of this EIR. A list of related projects, which is used as the basis for the discussion of cumulative impacts in each section is also provided. 1. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regional Setting b. Local Setting and Land Uses c. Surrounding Land Uses 2. RELATED PROJECTS Wilshire Grand Redevelopment Project III. Environmental Setting Draft Environmental Impact Report Page III-1 City of Los Angeles July 2010 1. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regional Setting The Project Site is located in Los Angeles County, in the Central City (downtown) area of the City of Los Angeles (the “City”) (see Section II [Project Description], Figure II-1 [Regional and Project Vicinity Map]). The Project Site is also located in the Financial Core district of downtown Los Angeles, which is bordered by South Park to the south and southwest, the Historic Core to the east and southeast, Bunker Hill to the north and northeast, and City West to the west and northwest across the US/Interstate 110 (the “Harbor Freeway”) (see Figure II-3 [Downtown Context Map] in Section II [Project Description]). Regional access to the Project Site is provided via the Harbor Freeway approximately 0.04 mile west of the Project Site. Wilshire Boulevard, Figueroa Street, and Olympic Boulevard serve as the primary arterial roadways providing access to the area surrounding the Project Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Park-Above-Parking Downtown: a Spatial-Based Impact Investigation
    PARK-ABOVE-PARKING DOWNTOWN: A SPATIAL-BASED IMPACT INVESTIGATION by LANBIN REN A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Landscape Architecture and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Lanbin Ren Title: Park-above-Parking Downtown: A Spatial-Based Impact Investigation This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Landscape Architecture by: Mark Gillem Chairperson Deni Ruggeri Member Robert Ribe Member Yizhao Yang Outside Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research & Innovation/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded December 2012 ii © 2012 Lanbin Ren iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Lanbin Ren Doctor of Philosophy Department of Landscape Architecture December 2012 Title: Park-above-Parking Downtown: A Spatial-Based Impact Investigation Parking and parks are both crucial to downtown economic development. Many studies have shown that downtown parks significantly contribute to increasing surrounding property values and attract residents, businesses and investment. Meanwhile, sufficient available parking promotes accessibility to downtown that also contributes to increasing tax revenue for local government. However, both downtown parks and parking raise problems. Many downtown parks have become places for drug dealing, shooting and vandalism since the decline of downtowns in the 1960s. At the same time, residents and visitors alike oftentimes complain about the lack of parking while in fact parking spaces occupy a large amount of land in downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare the Parks
    Curating the City: Wilshire Blvd. Lesson 10: Compare the Parks What You Need Grade Level: All Levels to Know: Curriculum Connections: English—Language Arts Kids’ Guide Correlation: Use this lesson in conjunction with pages 8-9 and 21 of the Guide. As your class explores MacArthur Park and Palisades Park, use this collaborative activity to help students reflect on how parks are similar and different and why parks are important in the life of the city. This activity is designed to be a supplement to additional trips along Wilshire Boulevard to see Hancock Park (the site of the La Brea Tar Pits and George C. Page Museum), Lafayette Park, Christine Emerson Reed Park, and Douglas Park. You can easily modify this activity to have students explore and reflect on the parks in your own community. Website Correlation: Go to laconservancy.org/wilshire. Under “Explore Wilshire Blvd.,” use the keyword search to find the pages on MacArthur and Lafayette Parks for photos and background information. You can also select “Community Landscape” under “Property Type” to see the parks along Wilshire, or search to locate photos and more information on Lafayette Park, La Brea Tar Pits, Reed Park, and Douglas Park. Focus Questions: How are MacArthur Park and Palisades Park similar and different? What makes other the parks along Wilshire, such as Hancock Park (the site of the La Brea Tar Pits), Lafayette Park, Reed Park, or Douglas Park special? Why are parks important? What do the parks tells us about how Los Angeles has changed over the years? Expected Learning Students will be able to identify unique characteristics of MacArthur Park, Outcomes: Palisades Park, Hancock Park, Lafayette Park, Reed Park, and Douglas Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Meeting Agenda City of Los Angeles Department
    SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS FACILITY REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COMMISSION TASK FORCE Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Ramona Hall Community Center Community Center Lobby 4580 North Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90065 LYNN ALVAREZ, CHAIR JOSEPH HALPER, COMMISSIONER Staff: Michael A. Shull, General Manager Cathie Santo Domingo, Acting Assistant General Manager Darryl Ford, Acting Superintendent City Attorney Representative EVERY PERSON WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION TASK FORCE MUST COMPLETE A SPEAKER REQUEST FORM AT THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM. PURSUANT TO COMMISSION POLICY, PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE HEARD ONLY AT THE TIME THE RESPECTIVE ITEM IS CONSIDERED. EACH SPEAKER WILL BE GRANTED TWO MINUTES FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, WITH FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES TOTAL ALLOWED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION. THE TIME LIMIT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON EACH RESPECTIVE ITEM SHALL BE SET AT THE DISCRETION OF THE COMMISSION TASK FORCE CHAIR. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ALL OTHER MATTERS WITHIN THE COMMISSION TASK FORCE’S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION WILL BE HEARD DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OF THE MEETING. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. CURRENT BUSINESS A. Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust Discussion of Conceptual Design Plans B. 10 Minute Walk Discussion of National Study Visit C. Quimby Park Fee Ordinance Implementation Update 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Comments by the Public on Matters within Task Force Jurisdiction. 4. NEXT MEETING October 23, 2019 The next Facility Repair and Maintenance Commission Task Force Meeting is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles, Ca 90017 $1,395,000
    S. HARTFORD AVENUE 758 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 $1,395,000 CENTRAL CITY WEST | 6,220 SF OF R5 (CW) - U/6 TIER 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 The Offering 05 Walkscore 06 Brick + Work 07 Area Map 08 Maps 09 Zimas Overview 11 Parcel Map 12 Property Photos 21 About the Agent 23 Compass Commercial PROPERTY OVERVIEW 758 S. Hartford Avenue THE OFFERING AT A GLANCE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION $1,395,000 6,220 SF Presented for sale is Raw Land. DON’T bother with evictions, NO need to Ellis, NO RSO Price Lot Sq Ft worries...just you and this land! Situated just outside of Downtown Los Angeles, west of the 110 freeway in Central City Tier 3 R5 (CW) - U/6 West, from here your future tenants can live car-free while being in the hustle and bustle TOC Zoning of deep urban Los Angeles. A fifteen minute walk to LA Live and FIGat7th, under 10 minutes on foot to Plan Check Current Use Vacant Land Kitchen and around the corner from The Teragram Ballroom concert hall, your tenants RSO No can access most of Los Angeles with a 13 minute trek to the 7th & Figueroa Metro Station. APN 5143-010-006 WalkScore calls this location a Walker’s and Rider’s Paradise, with a Walk Score of 94 and a rare Transit Score of 100! LOCAL AREA ON FOOT The CW Zoning is equivalent to an R5 Zoning (the Holy Grail of Residential Zoning) with practically no height limit and a Maximum FAR of 6:1 (or 8.7:1 by TOC)! Build 55± units • 5 Minutes or Less • 15 Minutes or Less by TOC or 31 by right.
    [Show full text]
  • City Lays Off 700 to Cut Budget Deficit
    WWW.BEVERLYPRESS.COM INSIDE • Harvey Milk Day celebrated. pg. 3 Sunny and • Water rationing warm, with days may change. temps around pg. 6 75º Volume 20 No. 20 Serving the West Hollywood, Hancock Park and Wilshire Communities May 20, 2010 YMCA Partners City Lays Off 700 to With Schools to Keep Fit Cut Budget Deficit n Most City Services Spared in 14-1 Decision BY AMY LYONS BY EDWIN FOLVEN Villaraigosa, who is expected to earning how to swing a base- make a decision on whether to ball bat, score a goal in soc- he Los Angeles City Council approve or veto it by June 1. The Lcer or dunk a basketball can approved a $6.7 billion bud- budget must be in place by July 1, be some of the most memorable Tget on Monday that elimi- and the city council will have one lessons in a child’s life. With recent nates a $485 million deficit and will month to reduce the number of lay- cuts to public school funding and preserve most city services at cur- offs before it goes into effect. The teacher layoffs, the Hollywood- rent levels. layoffs would be spread across all Wilshire YMCA is partnering with The budget calls for layoffs of city agencies except the police and local elementary schools to make approximately 761 employees, but fire departments. An additional sure physical education does not officials will be working with a 1,000 layoffs may be necessary in fall by the wayside. coalition of unions representing October if labor negotiations do not The YMCA Program, Physical city employees to try to reduce that result in savings through union Learning Activities for Youth number.
    [Show full text]
  • INITIAL STUDY 945 W. 8Th Street Project
    City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Environmental Analysis Section City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012 INITIAL STUDY CENTRAL CITY COMMUNITY PLAN AREA 945 W. 8th Street Project Case Number: ENV-2017-2513-EIR Project Location: 945 W. 8th Street (Project Site); 951 W. 8th Street; 1013 W. 8th Street; 959 W. 7th Street; 725 S. Figueroa Street; and 777 S. Figueroa Street (Unified Development Site), Los Angeles, CA, 90015 Council District: 14 Project Description: The 945 W. 8th Street Project (e.g., the proposed Project or Project) proposes to develop a mixed-use residential and commercial development on an approximately 1.29-acre (56,220-square- foot) vacant rectangular site (Project Site) within the larger approximately 7.7-acre Unified Development Site. The Unified Development Site includes the entire block bounded by the Harbor Freeway (SR-110) to the west, S. Figueroa Street to the east, W. 7th Street to the north, and W. 8th Street to the south. No new development is proposed outside of the Project Site, and existing uses within the Unified Development Site would continue to operate as under existing conditions. The mixed-use Project would include up to 791,843 square feet of floor area in a single tower atop an 11-level podium (Podium) with two entirely subterranean levels (below grade relative to W. 8th Street), three partially subterranean levels (above grade as viewed from W. 8th Street and below grade relative to W. 7th Street), and six above-grade levels. The total maximum building height would be 64 stories or approximately 695 feet above grade as viewed from W.
    [Show full text]