Holding an Orb in His Hand: the Angel 'Anafi'el and a Late Antiquity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Holding an Orb in His Hand: The Angel ‘Anafi’el and a Late Antiquity Helios Mosaic Moshe Idel Three Possible Sources for Heikhalot Literature anchored in the assumption of continuity to another that The nature of the sources of the so-called Heikhalot presupposes increased discontinuity, as if part of some form literature and its avatars are topics that still await detailed of religious controversy between the authors of Heikhalot scholarly analyses. Though the Hebrew texts that are literature and emerging Christian thought. More conceived of as belonging to this literature are rather few recently another approach, which sees some important and relatively short, albeit quite difficult, more efforts developments in late antiquity Judaism as a confrontation have been invested in elucidating their contents than with the Greek-Roman pagan culture, has received in pointing out their probable sources. When such an impetus.4 In the following, I shall also address the possible attempt has been made by suggesting that the origins of relevance of this approach for a Heikhalot theme. Let me this literature lie in earlier Jewish sources, works related be clear: the following is not a comprehensive proposal for to the Jewish temple traditions and its priests as the reducing the sources of the Heikhalot literature to Greek preservers, as well as to the Dead Sea literature,1 the mythology, but for putting in relief one more possible reactions of scholars have been rather negative.2 Instead, source in addition to others that have been mentioned the new assumption that seems to have been adopted in above. Without awareness of multiple possibilities, recent studies supposes positive affinities to concepts and scholarly writing on the Heikhalot sources can easily ideals found in Christianity, as well as negative reactions become partisan research that overemphasizes one of the to them.3 The pendulum moves from an approach that is different plausible sources and falls into a dogmatic mode. 1 See Ithamar Gruenwald, “Mekoman shel masorot kohaniyyot bi- Mystic: Rabbinic Martyrology and the Making of the Merkavah Mysticism .ziratah shel ha-mistikah shel ha-merkavah ve-shel shi‘ur komah” (The (Tübingen, 2005) and some of the studies in Adam H. Becker and Impact of Priestly Traditions on the Creation of Merkabah Mysticism Annette Yoshiko Reed (eds.), The Ways that Never Parted: Jews and and Shi‘ur Qomah), in Ha-mistikah ha-yehudit ha-kdumah (Early Jewish Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Minneapolis, Mysticism), Jerusalem Studies in Jewish Thought, 6, ed. Joseph Dan 2007). For early Rabbinic Judaism and early Christianity see the earlier (Jerusalem, 1987), 65–120 (Hebrew), and in a more elaborate manner view of Daniel Boyarin, Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Rachel Elior, The Three Temples: On the Emergence of Jewish Mysticism, Christianity and Judaism (Palo Alto, 1999) and idem, Border Lines: The tr. David Louvish (Oxford and Portland, 2004). See also the two studies Partition of Judaeo-Christianity (Philadelphia, 2004). A more nuanced of Jody Magness (below, n. 60) that adopt the priestly identity of some view is found recently in idem, “Beyond Judaisms: Metatron and the Ars Judaica 2013 of the themes she deals with. Divine Polymorphy in Ancient Judaism,” JSJ 41 (2010): 323–65. See 2 See, e.g., Noam Mizrahi, “She‘elat ha-zikah bein shirat olat ha-Shabat also below, n. 107. le-sifrut ha-heikhalot: hebetey lashon ve-signon” (The Supposed 4 See Philipp Bloch, “Rom und die Mystiker der Merkabah,” in Festschrift Relationship between the Song of the Sabbath Sacrifice and Hekhalot zum siebzigsten Geburtstage Jakob Guttmanns (rep. Toronto, 2011), 113– Literature: Linguistic and Stylistic Aspects), Meghillot 7 (2009): 263–98 24. On the new direction of explaining the “significant other” of early (Hebrew), as well as Peter Schaefer’s study mentioned in the next Rabbinic literature, see Seth Schwartz, Imperialism and Jewish Society: footnote. 200 B.C.E. to 640 C.E. (Princeton, 2003); Adiel Schremer, Brothers 3 See the strong penchant in this direction in the recent studies of Estranged: Heresy, Christianity and Jewish Identity in Late Antiquity Peter Schaefer, The Origins of Jewish Mysticism (Princeton, 2009), (Oxford and New York, 2010); Israel Knohl, The Messiah before Jesus: especially 32–33. See also Ra‘anan S. Boustan, From Martyr to The Suffering Servant of the Dead Sea Scrolls (Berkeley, 2002). 1 Moshe Idel The presence of Greek words in the Heikhalot treatises in Jewish mystical literature.10 In my opinion the three has been duly pointed out.5 Gershom Scholem, following divergent explanations, even if and when they are Heinrich Graetz, even suggested seeing in the Byzantine correct, are not exclusive, and the penchant to embrace background a possible source for what he calls the just one of them does not do justice to the complexities Basylomorphism of some of its treatises;6 other proposals in of the texts and of the circumstances that generated the that direction have also been advanced,7 though it seems various texts. In fact, different forms of hybrid cultures, that the possible impact of Greek sources has been rather or if one prefers, syncretistic religious cultures, met in neglected in the more recent studies. In some instances I late antiquity, forged even more hybrid offspring as they have pointed to the possible impact of Greek mythology developed in different religious centers and diverse social related to Atlas based on a detail found in texts related to and political circumstances. We shall deal below with Heikhalot literature.8 In that context I have referred also some themes found in the Heikhalot literature, namely, to another possibility, that of seeing in a certain dimension a series of relatively short treatises written in Hebrew of the figure of the representation of Apollo/Helios a since the early Middle Ages which deal with the structure plausible source for some details of a certain discussion of the architecture of the world of the divinity and the found in a difficult passage in the Heikhalot literature.9 techniques to reach it. Given the sharp conceptual If the proposal of seeing a mythological figure from the disparity of the texts assembled by modern scholars Greco-Roman world as a source for a passage of Heikhalot under the wide umbrella of Heikhalot or Merkavah literature as delineated below is accepted, it would be literature, and the variety of versions in which they have wise to also turn our gaze toward other corpora of ancient been preserved, unsophisticated answers are inevitably writings that were available to the anonymous authors of simplistic, especially given the intertwined types of the Heikhalot literature in addition to those implied in coexistence of Judaism, Christianity, and the diverse the available proposals of scholars in the field. This does pagan cultures in late antiquity. not invalidate the pertinence of these explanations, when offered in a much more restrained manner than is done in practice, though I believe that each explanation concerns A Corrupted Passage of a Heikhalot Text and different parts of the Heikhalot literature and different Its Correction topics. The present proposal should be considered in the Some of the texts belonging to the Heikhalot literature broader context of exploiting information concerning reached us in corrupted versions, a fact that has ancient and late antiquity in order to elucidate a limited complicated understanding of their content and attempts number of late ancient and medieval phenomena found at tracing their sources. For example, in Ms. Munich 40, 5 Johanan H. Levy, Olamot nifgashim: mehkarim al ma‘amadah shel ha- 9 The topics were discussed in a lecture I delivered in 2000 at a yahadut ba-olam ha-yevani-ha-roma’i (Studies in Jewish Hellenism), 2d conference dealing with Judaism in late antiquity organized by Prof. Lee ed. (Jerusalem, 1969), 259–65 (Hebrew); Gideon Bohak, “Remains of I. Levine and the Ben-Zion Dinur Center for Jewish History at Hebrew Greek Words and Magical Formulae in Heikhalot Literature,” Kabbalah University, when I promised to elaborate elsewhere on the topic; here 6 (2001): 121–34. I attempt to fulfill this promise. I have succinctly referred to this topic 6 Gershom Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (New York, 1960), in a number of my studies. See, e.g., Idel, Ben, 245; idem, Ascensions on 54–55, and see also p. 48. High in Jewish Mysticism: Pillars, Ladder, Lines (Budapest and New York, 7 See Moshe Idel, Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions of the 2005), 87. Artificial Anthropoid (New York, 1990), 285–86, or Guy G. Stroumsa, 10 See Yehuda Liebes, Studies in Jewish Myth and Jewish Messianism, tr. “Mystical Descents,” in Death, Ecstasy and Other Worldly Journeys, eds. Batya Stein (Albany, 1993), 65–92; Moshe Idel, Olam ha-mal’akhim: John J. Collins and Michael Fishbane (Albany, 1995), 139–54. bein hitgalut le-hit‘alut (The Angelic World: Apotheosis and Theophany) 8 See Moshe Idel, “From Italy to Ashkenaz and Back: On the Circulation (Tel Aviv, 2008), 171 n. 91 (Hebrew); idem, “The Image of Man above of Jewish Mystical Traditions,” Kabbalah 14 (2006): 64–65 n. 66; idem, the Sefirot: R. David ben Yehuda he-Hasid’s Theosophy of Ten Supernal Ars Judaica 2013 Ben: Sonship and Jewish Mysticism (London and New York, 2008), 647. sahsa. hot. and Its Reverberations,” Kabbalah 20 (2009): 181–212. 2 Holding an Orb in His Hand: The Angel ‘Anafi’el and a Late Antiquity Helios Mosaic fol. 120v,