DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PINNACLE LEARNING TRUST MEMBERS MEETING Friday 29Th September 2017 at OSFC at 12:45

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PINNACLE LEARNING TRUST MEMBERS MEETING Friday 29Th September 2017 at OSFC at 12:45 THE PINNACLE LEARNING TRUST MEMBERS MEETING Friday 29th September 2017 At OSFC At 12:45 Present: Mrs Jayne Clarke (JC) Executive Principal/Principal OSFC Mr Dave McEntee (DM) Hathershaw Principal Mr Andrew Kilburn (AK) MAT Member Cllr Ateeque Ur-Rehman (AU) MAT Member Baroness Estelle Morris (EM) MAT Member Dr Sanna Waseem Khawaja (SW) MAT Member In Attendance: Miss Danielle Hunt Company Secretary/Clerk Welcome and Introductions AK welcomed all attendees to the meeting and formal introductions were made. AK explained that there is no formal agenda for this preliminary meeting, however there are resolutions that need to be officially passed by Members, hence the requirement for the meeting. Members Update JC informed Members that Professor Miles Hewstone, a professor of psychology at Oxford has now been confirmed as a Member of the Pinnacle Learning Trust. Professor Hewstone has been undertaking some longitudinal research in Oldham and was very interested positive about becoming involved in the Trust. JC advised Professor Hewstone is an expert in his field and a friend of both colleges, however, no formalities had been carried out thus far. JC explained that she was hoping to have a Member confirmed from the University of Manchester in the very near future. Brian Cox had previously verbally agreed to become a Member of the Trust, however this was not confirmed. It is hoped that Professor Danielle George, a professor of engineering, might be 1 approached to become a Member. Kevin Sinfield, a former student of OSFC and England/Leeds Rhinos rugby league captain had also been approached, although JC was unsure if he will commit to the role and hoped to have everything finalised within the next couple of weeks. Performance JC explained that OSFC became a 16-19 academy on 1st September 2017, the same date that Hathershaw converted from a single academy (The Hathershaw College Academy Trust) to a MAT (The Pinnacle Learning Trust) in full partnership with OSFC. JC advised that OSFC’s performance remains strong, having just obtained its first strong set of results following the introduction of linear A-Levels. The last Ofsted inspection, which took place this time last year, graded the college good and OSFC will most likely be self-assessing as a very strong good, based on this year’s outcomes. JC was pleased to report that the Teaching School application had been successful and OSFC would be working in close partnership with Hathershaw, Saddleworth, North Chadderton, Parrs Wood and five primary schools locally within the Teaching School Alliance. JC advised that there had been no induction as yet, however, there was the makings of a clear action plan that is linked to the Opportunity Area priorities. DM informed Members that Hathershaw traditionally has a history of high levels of deprivation and low levels of attainment on entry. Despite this, students continue to perform very well and for the last three years, both progress and attainment outcomes have remained above the national standard. DM was pleased to report that the college’s Progress 8 figure is +0.35 and +0.31 for Disadvantaged students, which is fantastic and is evidence that the gap between Disadvantaged students and Others at the college is narrowing. DM explained that at the last Ofsted inspection, Hathershaw was graded good. The college’s SEF grades itself as a solid good, with aspirations of becoming outstanding by the time of the next Ofsted inspection. DM confirmed that Hathershaw had been a stand-alone academy since 2011. JC explained that since forming the MAT, there had already been some cross-MAT working, including aligning both institutions’ finance software and forming a single payroll, HR was aligning and ICT services had already begun to work together, along with various teaching and learning and peer mentoring developments between teaching staff and students from the two colleges. MAT Growth DM advised that two local primary schools had expressed an interest in joining the MAT; Medlock Valley Primary and Broadfield Primary. Broadfield, he explained, is a solidly good primary school and Medlock is currently graded good, but have recently self-assessed as requiring improvement, with an Ofsted inspection pending. AK advised that OSFC had been through the Area Review process and had considered both Ashton SFC and Oldham College in terms of forging close partnership links, but felt that OSFC’s history, traditions and values fitted more closely with Hathershaw. AK felt that colleagues have a clear understanding of the values which underpin the Trust and felt the partnership is built on solid foundations, which is essential to its success. 2 In terms of growth, AK advised that no definite figure has been placed upon the number of schools that will be permitted to join the PLT, but felt that perhaps between ten and fifteen schools is an appropriate number. JC felt that Trustees must be cautious about growing too rapidly, explaining that not many local secondary schools have not already joined a MAT or have not begun the process of joining one. Saddleworth and Radclyffe are the only secondary schools in the area who do not belong to a MAT but both schools are currently resistant to becoming academies. Royton and Crompton have recently been placed in special measures and will most likely be sponsored by a large national academy chain. EM asked whether Members foresee competition surrounding adopting the good primary schools into their MAT’s. JC advised that as well as Pinnacle, North Chadderton and Crompton House have also formed MATs. Other schools have joined large academy chains such as Oasis and E-ACT and Waterhead is part of the South Pennine Trust. A number of primaries have joined MATs and JC felt that there will be competition to attract the good schools, however, TPLT is very much focussed on local schools within Oldham. EM asked whether the Trust would be interested in adopting a primary school that was in special measures. AU felt that the vision of the PLT is to help struggling institutions to improve, particularly improving standards in Oldham. JC informed members that the Trust had already been approached to support Collective Spirit prior to it closing down and prior to the official formation of the MAT. JC acknowledged there may be external pressure to adopt struggling schools in the future. AK felt that issues of capacity and growth are ones that will be carefully considered, adding that Trustees will decline schools if they feel they are unsuitable. JC agreed, adding that the Trust will not look to adopt primary schools of grade three or grade four before there is a good primary school within the MAT for them to work with. JC informed Members that there are currently five primary schools within the Teaching School Alliance, four graded good and one graded outstanding, so having the Teaching School at the centre of the MAT adds capacity, even though not all schools within the Teaching School Alliance are within the MAT. JC pointed out that it had recently come to light that church schools can be included in MATs, therefore links with St Martins Primary School could potentially be explored further. Appointment of Trustees AK informed Members that the Trust has secured eight out of a maximum of nine potential Trustees, of which a minimum of five have to be officially appointed whilst there is a quorate group of Members. AK felt that the group of Trustees is a very strong group and along with DM, JC, AU and AK, includes John Porter, a local solicitor who was a parent Governor at OSFC and who is now their Chair of Governors. Chris Wilson, who was a senior manager at the Co-op Bank and who helped with the establishment of the University Centre in Oldham. Sandra Mavro-Michaelis who was previously a Primary Headteacher and Primary School Advisor and Mike Gibbons who was formerly Director of External Relations at the University of Manchester and is now Deputy Registrar at MMU and who sat on OSFC’s Governing Body previously for five years. 3 JC explained that a Trustee vacancy will be kept open for a primary head once a primary school joins the MAT in order that all phases are represented. At the first formal meeting of the Trustees on 17th October, a draft development plan will be discussed and shared with Members in due course. RESOLVED: Members of The Pinnacle Learning Trust formally appointed John Porter, Chris Wilson, Jayne Clarke, Dave McEntee, Andrew Kilburn, Sandra Mavro-Michaelis, Mike Gibbons and Ateeque Ur-Rehman as Trustees of The Pinnacle Learning Trust. AK felt it would be of benefit that pictures of Trustees are circulated. Vision and Values AK distributed the vision and values document, informing Members that a great deal of time had been spent on ensuring the right amount of detail is included in order that people understand why the PLT has been formed and ultimately its vision to promote high standards and excellence. AK advised that the PLT Board intend to focus on the vision and values and the Trust’s aspirations for the next three years, advising that Trustees have already begun to discuss the profile and identity of the MAT, along with the importance of good governance. AK advised that he and JC had recently attended an event for new academies and, although there was some useful content, AK felt that the ethos and direction of the PLT would be very different to that of the larger academy chains. AK advised that the scheme of delegation for schools joining the MAT will be dependent upon the status of each school. Trustees have been tasked with establishing a process for adopting other schools into the MAT, which will be different and geared towards the needs of each individual institution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schools Forum Commercial Services Directorate Schools Finance Team Level 13, Civic Centre West Street, Oldham OL1 1XJ Tel: 0161 770 4058 Fax: 0161 770 4077
    To Members of the Schools Forum Commercial Services Directorate Schools Finance Team Level 13, Civic Centre West Street, Oldham OL1 1XJ Tel: 0161 770 4058 Fax: 0161 770 4077 Dear Colleague Re: SCHOOLS FORUM Please find attached the agenda and papers for the next meeting of the Schools Forum, to be held at 5.30pm on Wednesday 28 November 2018 in Crompton Suite, Civic Centre, Oldham. Tea and Coffee will be available. On arrival can colleagues report to Rochdale Road reception where there will be someone available to show you to the meeting venue. Car parking passes will be available as usual from Rochdale Road reception. If you are unable to attend this meeting could you please send your apologies to Vicky Gibbons 0161 770 1104 or email to [email protected] Yours sincerely Samantha Smith Senior Finance Manager Commercial Services SCHOOLS FORUM Wednesday 28th November 2018 5.30pm Crompton Suite Approx duration Officer Papers 1 Welcome and Apologies Apologies/Declarations of Interest Chair - 2 Minutes and Matters Arising Minutes of meeting held on 11th September 5 mins Chair Attached 2018 3 2018/19 DSG update and 2019/20 estimate 15 mins Liz Caygill Attached 4 High Needs Places 2019/20 5 mins Liz Caygill Attached 5 2019/20 Schools Funding and response to the 40 mins Liz Caygill Attached consultation 6 Forward Plan 5 mins Liz Caygill Attached 7 Any other Business Any other business – Must be notified to Liz Caygill @ [email protected] or on telephone 0161 770 1012 24 hours before the meeting Dates of next meeting: 17th January
    [Show full text]
  • MYM 2019 Report , Item 9. PDF 2 MB
    OLDHAM RESULTS REPORT Page 2 Make Your Mark 2019 Report 17/12/19 Page 3 Make Your Mark 2019 Report 17/12/19 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 CHANGES FOR 2019 .................................................................................................................. 5 BALLOTING ................................................................................................................................. 5 MAKE YOUR MARK ISSUES ...................................................................................................... 6 OLDHAM RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 7 SCHOOL BREAKDOWN ............................................................................................................. 8 The Blue Coat CofE School and 6th Form ................................................................................ 9 The Co-Operative Academy Failsworth .................................................................................... 9 The Crompton House CofE Academy and 6th Form ............................................................... 10 E-Act Royton and Crompton Academy ................................................................................... 10 The Hathershaw College
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School and Sixth Form Performance PDF
    Report to OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PERFORMANCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY SELECT COMMITTEE Secondary school and sixth form performance Portfolio Holder: Cllr Shaid Mushtaq, Cabinet Member for Education & Early Years Officer Contact: Richard Lynch, Director of Education, Skills & Early Years Report Author: Tony Shepherd, Head of Learning 12 March 2020 Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to provide Elected Members with a review of secondary school and sixth form performance. Executive Summary In 2020 the pandemic caused the closure of schools and cancellation of examinations. Students were awarded their centre assessment grade or calculated grade, whichever was higher. This increased grades and meant that results for 2020 could not be directly compared to other years. In addition, performance data is not available at the school level, making 2020 analysis very limited. This paper provides a performance overview by summarising 2020 published data and reflecting on trends in 2017-2019 published data. In 2020, GCSE and A’ level outcomes for Oldham pupils were below national averages and the gaps between Oldham and national averages were wider than previously. The trends from 2017 to 2019 show a widening gap between GCSE and A’ level outcomes in Oldham and those nationally. Recommendations To note the report and actions planned to address areas of under-performance. Overview and Scrutiny Board Tuesday, 2 March 2021 Secondary school and sixth form performance 1 Background 1.1 This paper provides an update to the Overview and Scrutiny Board on secondary school and sixth form performance in Oldham. 1.2 Performance of pupils in exams are generally norm-referenced, so a similar proportion of grades are awarded each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
    www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester in Context 11
    Contents Introduction 3 Using the Families of Schools document 7 Greater Manchester in context 11 Family pages 16 Contextual family pages 38 Annex 1 – What it all means: footnotes and explanations 43 Annex 2 – School contact details 49 2 Introduction 1. Families of Schools: the fifth edition The first four editions of Families of Schools for Greater Manchester Secondary schools were well received. We have been working with schools and education professionals across Greater Manchester to develop this fifth edition for 2011. As with previous years, this edition includes GCSE results with and without English and maths, a Contextual Value Added (CVA) measure and contextual families focusing on English as an Additional Language (EAL) and mobility. 2. How have families been grouped? Schools are grouped into families based on an average of prior attainment data and context data. Prior attainment data is the Average Key Stage 2 (KS2) Point Score (APS) for all pupils in Year 7 to Year 11 matched to Key Stage 4 data. Context data includes: • Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) data, calculated by linking individual pupil postcodes to IDACI data and compiling an average figure for each school 1. • The proportion of pupils eligible to receive Free School Meals (FSM). • The IDACI and FSM school averages are combined to give an overall indicator for the School Environment (SE). • The percentage of pupils whose first language is known or believed to be other than English (EAL). • A mobility measure, defined as the percentage of pupils in Year 10 or Year 11 who have joined the school within the last 2 years (L2Y).
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Study 1 List of Abbreviations
    1 List of Abbreviations 2 2 Executive Summary 4 3 Introduction 7 Why we have done the Study 7 How we have done the Study 10 4 Physical Infrastructure 16 Travel Routes 16 Street Lighting 28 Utilities 28 Flood Prevention 35 Waste 36 5 Social Infrastructure 41 Access to Services 41 Education 41 Housing 54 Health 57 Community 61 Emergency Facilities 68 Religious Facilities 71 Cultural Facilities 75 6 Green Infrastructure 78 Open Spaces 78 Natural Environment 86 Waterways 94 7 Infrastructure planning delivery 98 8 Glossary of Terms 109 9 Appendix 1: Infrastructure planning updates 111 Oldham LDF: Infrastructure Study 1 List of Abbreviations This is a list of the most commonly used abbreviations in this report. BW Boroughwide BSF Building Schools for the Future CG Central Government DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government DfE Department for Education DfT Department for Transport DPD Development Plan Document EA Environment Agency FC Forestry Commission GM Greater Manchester GMFM Greater Manchester Forecasting Model GMTU Greater Manchester Transport Unit GMWDA Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority HMR Housing Market Renewal LAA Local Area Agreement LIFT Local Improvement Finance Trust LDF Local Development Framework LTP Local Transport Plan MCC Manchester City Council MWMS Municipal Waste Management Strategy NDC New Deal for Communities OC Oldham Council PCP Primary Capital Programme PCT Primary Care Trust PFI Private Finance Initiative PPG Planning Policy Guidance note 2 Oldham LDF: Infrastructure Study PPS Planning Policy Statement PRoW Public Rights of Way RFA Regional Funding Allocation SAC Special Area of Conservation SBI Site of Biological Importance SCS Sustainable Community Strategy SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SPA Special Protection Area SPD Supplementary Planning Document SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest UP Unity Partnership Oldham LDF: Infrastructure Study 3 2 Executive Summary 2.1 Critically, infrastructure will not hinder the delivery of the Local Development Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter COVID 26.06.2020
    26th June 2020 Dear Parents and Carers, A warm welcome to all our families. This week we have welcomed back some of our year 6 children. They have been so resilient in adapting to the changes made in the school environment. We have also welcomed back more key worker children and all have enjoyed their learning in school. Update from the Government The intention from the government is that all pupils will go back to school in September, and they will be releasing further guidance next week to assist schools to prepare for a full return. We will expect further detail on the following topics before the end of the summer term: • Guidance on preparing for September • Curriculum expectations for the new academic year • Further detail on arrangements for accountability, assessment, qualifications and inspection from September We will therefore update parents as soon as we know more information. Transition Our teacher’s have been working hard with the teachers in Glodwick infants to ensure the best possible transition for the year 2 children’s arrival to Alexandra Park Junior School in September. Important transition meetings have taken place and Year 2 children should soon be meeting their Year 3 teachers virtually (through video) and will receive their own story book which they will enjoy reading with their families and support their learning in September. The year 6 teachers have also been working hard with the Secondary schools in supporting our year 6 children into year 7. We are planning surprises for our year 6 children in order that we can say goodbye to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Pack YP 2016
    1 We live in a society where more people vote in televised talent shows than on polling day and where column inches are devoted to celebrity gossip than topical issues. We are fast becoming a nation of non participants with young people a high proportion of those failing to take up their voting entitlement. Although there is widespread concern that young people are disillusioned with politics there is also an acknowledgement that young people can be passionate about national, international and environmental issues as well as local community matters. Our challenge is to enable young people to enjoy discussing these issues and relate them to democracy and the ballot box. This pack tells you about how to get involved in the Oldham Youth Council elections and provide information on how to develop you campaign. 2 Page What is Oldham Youth Council? 4 Hello from the Youth Mayor 4 A word from the Chair 5 What happens in Oldham? 6 How do you get involved? 7 How to contact Oldham Youth Council 7 How to write a manifesto 8 Example manifestos 8 Contact details 10 Manifesto template 11 What will happen next? 12 Check list 13 3 The Oldham Youth Council is made up of approximately 60 members aged 11-21, from all over Oldham. It is a borough wide organisation that enables and encourages young people to campaign to make a positive change for other young people from Oldham. They raise issues with the local Council and services that affect young people of Oldham. This resource pack will enable you to get fully involved in the Oldham Youth Council election process and enable you to understand and see the benefits of voting and being a candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Early Years, Position Statement on Standards 2019
    Report to OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PERFORMANCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY SELECT COMMITTEE Education and Early Years, Position Statement on Standards 2019 Portfolio Holder: Cllr Shaid Mushtaq, Cabinet Member for Education, Skills & Early Years Officer Contact: Andrew Sutherland, Director of Education, Skills & Early Years Report Author: Adrian Calvert, Education Partnership Leader Ext. 8170 12 Marc 2020 Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to provide Elected Members with a position statement on education standards in Oldham in 2019, as indicated by outcomes across key stages and in Ofsted inspections, in order to: Take informed positions on issues affecting standards in Oldham Promote broad, evidence-based dialogue Influence local policies Identify opportunities for capacity building Executive Summary The information within this report refers to all Oldham Schools and Academies. All published data refers to all publicly funded establishments. Key educational outcomes in Oldham schools and settings improved in most areas in 2019. As a consequence, the gaps to national figures have narrowed for most borough indicators. The most significant trends from 2018 to 2019 are: The Early Years ‘good level of development’ (GLD) measure in 2019 increased by 4ppts to 64.1% compared to a national rise of only 0.3ppts In Key Stage 2 assessments, the percentage of Oldham pupils achieving the National Standards for Reading, Writing and Maths (RWM) remained the same as 2018, at 63%, a rise of 16% since 2016. Combined Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing and Mathematics for disadvantaged pupils in Oldham is 53.5% which is 2% above the national average (51.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Failsworth Schools
    List of schools in Oldham 1 List of schools in Oldham The following is a partial list of active schools in the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham in Greater Manchester, England. By default, the table below is sorted into state schools (i.e. primary, secondary, special, etc.), independent schools, and further and higher education establishments. See also: List of schools in Greater Manchester School Locality Description Headteacher Ofsted Website [2] Alexandra Park Junior School Oldham Junior school Mrs I. Barratt 105626 website [1] [4] Alt Primary School Oldham Primary school Mr G. Leach (Executive) 105682 website [3] [6] Bare Trees Primary School Chadderton Primary school Mr J. Tobin 135258 website [5] [8] Beal Vale Primary School Shaw Primary school Mr J. Richards 105672 website [7] Beever Primary School Oldham Primary school Mr G. Oates 105627 website [9] [10] Blackshaw Lane Junior and Royton Primary school Mrs A. McCormick 105652 website Infant School [11] [12] Broadfield Primary School Oldham Primary school Mrs P. Stennett 105676 website [13] [14] Buckstones Primary School Shaw Primary school Miss S. Healey 105671 website [15] [16] Burnley Brow Community Chadderton Primary school Mrs H. Atkinson-Smith 105680 website Primary School [17] [18] Christ Church C.E. Primary Denshaw Primary school Mrs S. Callaghan 105693 website School [19] [20] Christ Church C.E. Primary Chadderton Primary school Mrs D. Payton 105707 website School [21] [22] Clarksfield Primary School Oldham Primary school Mrs T. O'Donnell 133711 website [23] [24] Coppice Primary Academy Coppice Primary school Mrs L. Needham 135153 website Academy (Executive) [25] [26] Corpus Christi R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance, It & Resources
    CABINET 10 th FEBRUARY 2006 JOINT REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ASSISTANT CHIEF EXECUTIVE (FINANCE, IT & RESOURCES) MEDIUM TERM CAPITAL STRATEGY 2006/07 to 2008/09 1. PURPOSE 1.1 This paper • sets out the draft Council’s capital strategy for the next three years • updates the latest projections for 2005/06 • sets out the commitments into 2006/7 and 2007/08 • identifies the effect of funding capital expenditure on the revenue budget • updates the prudential indicators for 2005/06. 2. Background 2.1 It is essential that we are able to evidence a budget process that links revenue and capital. With the advent of changes to the revenue support regime and an increasing internal demand for “prudential borrowing” the process for planning and delivering the revenue and capital budgets needs to be improved. This paper sets out an approach for 2006/07 and beyond. 2.2 In February 2005 a report (EDRS 05020006) was taken to Cabinet detailing the 2005/06 capital programme and suggested new starts. This showed committed expenditure in 2005/06 of £37,928,000 with resources of £46,677,000 leaving £8,749,000 available for new starts. The HRA expenditure and resources stood at £33,853,000. 2.3 Proposals in this report were scrutinised by the Finance and Resources Overview and Scrutiny Commission on the 26 th January 2006 (EDRS 6010087). No recommendations were made by the Commission to Cabinet. 3. Executive Summary/Recommendations 3.1 The main items to note from this report are: • The new draft capital strategy setting out the Councils strategy for planning future capital spend in particular the new policy led scoring mechanism requiring the need for a business case for each scheme which includes taking account of the impact on revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Grid Export Data
    Organisation Name. First Name Last Name Email The de Ferrers Academy Steven Allen [email protected] Rockwood Academy Fuzel Choudhury [email protected] Nansen Primary School Catherine Rindl [email protected] Hunsley Primary School Lucy Hudson [email protected] Westwood College Andrew Shaw [email protected] St John's Marlborough Patrick Hazlewood [email protected] Devizes School Malcolm Irons [email protected] Hardenhuish School Jan Hatherell [email protected] Beacon Academy Anna Robinson [email protected] Blyth Academy Gareth Edmunds [email protected] Beauchamp College Kathryn Kelly [email protected] Wreake Valley Community College Tony Pinnock [email protected] Sir Robert Pattinson Academy Helen Renard [email protected] Chipping Norton School Simon Duffy [email protected] King Edward VII Science and Sport JenniferCollege Byrne [email protected] Rawlins Community College Mr Callum Orr [email protected] Charnwood College (Upper) Wendy Marshall [email protected] Newent Community School and SixthGlen Form Centre Balmer [email protected] Fairfield High School Catriona Mangham [email protected] The City Academy Bristol John Laycock [email protected] Unity City Academy Neil Powell [email protected] CTC Kingshurst Academy Damon Hewson [email protected] Sir John Gleed School Will Scott [email protected]
    [Show full text]