DOCSLIB.ORG

Thursday, March 29, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CANADA VOLUME 137 S NUMBER 039 S 1st SESSION S 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, March 29, 2001 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2497 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, March 29, 2001 The House met at 10 a.m. Erskine May describes contempt as: —any act or omission which obstructs or impedes either House of Parliament in the _______________ performance of its functions, or which obstructs or impedes any Member or officer of such House in the discharge of his duty, or which has a tendency, directly or indirectly, to produce such results may be treated as a contempt even though there is Prayers no precedent for the offence. _______________ We do have precedence here. There are news articles, as I have referred to, the Toronto Star, the Hamilton Spectator and the D (1000) London Free Press, detailing the exact contents of the annual report of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. [English] Annual reports to parliament are to remain secret and confiden- CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION tial until tabled in the House of Commons. Other agencies, crown The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table the annual corporations, the auditor general and so on are able to respect this report and the employment equity report of the Canadian Human tenet. Why is it that the Canadian Human Rights Commission Rights Commission for the year 2000. believes that it is above the normal protocols and trashes them instead of respecting them? * * * The member of parliament for Provencher raised a similar point of order on March 14, 2001 at page 1646 of Hansard when he PRIVILEGE argued that his rights as a member of parliament were breached because of the contempt shown by the Minister of Justice to this CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION REPORT House in excluding members of parliament from briefings on a bill Mr. John Williams (St. Albert, Canadian Alliance): Mr. prior to it being tabled in the House. Yet the media had the contents Speaker, I rise on a question of privilege this morning as my rights and substance of the bill published prior to its tabling. as a member of parliament have been abused again. Mr. Speaker, you ruled on March 19, 2001, at page 1839, that the I speak of the annual report of the Canadian Human Rights member for Provencher had a prima facie case of privilege. Today Commission which you just tabled in the House immediately prior we have a repeat of the same situation. The media had the contents to my speaking, but which has been reported extensively in the and substance of the annual report while the members of parlia- press this morning. For example, the Toronto Star and other papers ment are in the dark. have reported it at length. The Canadian Human Rights Commission falls under the pur- This contempt of parliament by this unelected and unaccount- view of the Minister of Justice. able commission and the Minister of Justice is quite obvious. This D is the second time in a month and a half that the commission has (1005 ) leaked one of its reports to the media prior to it being tabled in the While the commission is a quasi-judicial body, it still has to House of Commons. I raised this as a question of privilege on answer to both the minister and to parliament. There is a pattern February 15, 2001 at page 714. here where the minister has contempt for this honourable and When it comes to government doing business, I sometimes have venerable institution. to wonder if this House means anything to it or is it just a superfluous adjunct as it jumps over the heads of this institution to Mr. Speaker, the situation is becoming intolerable. I ask that you communicate directly with Canadian people. find that there is prima facie case of the breach of my privileges. Since you ruled that way so recently, and it was obviously ignored, Mr. Speaker, I ask that you speak out and protect the privileges I ask that you recommend that the Standing Committee on Proce- of this House and its members. dure and House Affairs deal with the matter sternly. 2498 COMMONS DEBATES March 29, 2001 Privilege Hon. Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House However, Mr. Speaker, I would suggest that because of the of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I agree generally with what the proximity in time, given your ruling, there is an opportunity here to hon. member has said. It is unfortunate, though, that he has chosen bring this matter also before the procedure and house affairs to trivialize such an important issue by somehow alleging that this committee to look at it. has something to do with the government. The government House leader is right. The Minister of Justice is First, the commission reports to parliament. The Speaker just not personally responsible, but this goes to the principles of rose and tabled the report. This has nothing to do with an action of governmental and ministerial responsibility. the government. The Speaker: We have a situation here where a report, which was prepared by an officer of the House of Commons, a person who An action of the government, which I regret, occurred some days reports to the House of Commons directly, has obviously been ago in the House for which instructions were clearly given about a given to the media, based on the information I am hearing in the protocol and giving these kinds of media briefings under embargo, House today. which, as we now know, were not respected by members of the media. The Chair indicated to ministers that these things could only The report stands permanently referred to the justice and human be done if done in a secure way, which I read to be a lockup or some rights committee of the House. It seems to me that the appropriate such thing, but that was a different issue altogether. course in the circumstances is for that committee to undertake its study of the report, as I am sure it will in due course. It is free to Mr. Speaker ruled on the previous item and we accepted the call the head of the commission and anyone else it sees fit to come ruling that he gave of prima facie and it is still before a parliamen- and explain what has happened and the circumstances. It seems to tary committee for further study. me that would be the appropriate course. Should the procedure and House affairs committee, as part of the In the case today, this was not a report that was given for the work it is doing on the question of release of documents that has government to table. This was a report given directly to parliament come to it as a result of my previous ruling, want to look at the and tabled in the House by the Speaker of the House. If someone matter, it is of course free to do so. has breached that, which obviously has happened, then I agree with the hon. member across. I do not object to what he has raised in the sense that it indicates rules were broken. D (1010 ) What I would suggest to the hon. member for St. Albert, the Where I do disagree with the hon. member is on the personal government House leader, the hon. member for Pictou—Antigon- comment he made about the Minister of Justice, alleging that she ish—Guysborough and all hon. members is that we let this go to was personally involved. He should retract his comment as he has the justice and legal affairs committee. If the committee has no proof of that. The hon. member knows that the minister does not concerns about what has happened and feels that something report that document. He knows that the minister is responsible for inappropriate happened, I will allow the hon. member for St. the estimates of that organization. That would be the same as Albert, if he wishes, to bring this matter back to the House. We will alleging that because I am responsible for the estimates of Elec- treat it as a matter of privilege and deal with it at that point. tions Canada, I am somehow responsible for the tabling or non-tabling, or the actions or non-actions of the Chief Electoral Officer, or that somehow the Minister of Justice would be responsi- However, I think that since this is a matter involving an officer of ble for adjudication of the supreme court. That is inappropriate and the House, I do not see that today there has been necessarily a the hon. member knows that. breach of the privileges. The matter can be investigated by a committee. The committee can come back to the House or the member can come back to the House and raise it as a question of While I agree with the principle of what he has raised, the privilege when we have heard the evidence on it. There will be gratuitous accusations against the Minister of Justice and against evidence. This matter is before the committee and making a finding the government are wrong and should be withdrawn. That being today that sends it to the committee again is unhelpful. said, I agree with the point that he has raised about the inappropri- ateness of the commission or anyone who by negligence wilfully I am aware that the procedure and House affairs committee is allows a report to leak out.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2001

    Annual Report 2001

    The Honourable Herb Dhaliwal The Honourable Robert Nault, P.C., M.P Natural Resources Canada Indian Affairs & Northern Development House of Commons House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 K1A 0A6 Dear Ministers: On behalf of the Environmental Studies Research Funds Management Board, it is my pleasure to submit the 2001 Annual Report for the Environmental Studies Research Funds in accordance with the Canada Petroleum Resources Act, paragraph 79(1)d. Sincerely yours, Bonnie J. Gray Chair Environmental Studies Research Funds Management Board ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES RESEARCH FUNDS ANNUAL REPORT 2001 FEBRUARY 2002 Environmental Studies Research Funds Profile The Environmental Studies Research Funds (ESRF) is a research program that sponsors environmental and social studies designed to assist government decision-making related to oil and gas exploration and development on Canada's frontier lands. The ESRF program, which was initiated in 1983 under the Canada Oil and Gas Act (COGA), now receives its legislated mandate through the superseding legislation, the Canada Petroleum Resources Act (CPRA) proclaimed in February 1987. Funding for the ESRF is provided by industry through levies on exploration and production properties on frontier lands. The ESRF is directed by a joint government / industry / public Management Board and is administered by a secretariat through which resides within the Operations Business Unit of the National Energy Board office in Calgary, Alberta. Published under the auspices of the Environmental Studies Research
  • Core 1..104 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

    Core 1..104 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 116 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 11, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7131 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 11, 2003 The House met at 2 p.m. challenged clients received a donation from Sun Country Cable, a donation that will enable the centre to continue its work in our Prayers community. Sun Country Cable donated the building. This building is next to Kindale's existing facility and both properties will eventually lead to construction of a new centre. In the meantime, the Ï (1405) building will be used for training and respite suites. [English] I am proud to be part of a community that looks out for those less The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesday we will now sing fortunate. Charity does begin at home. O Canada, and we will be led by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre. *** [Editor's Note: Members sang the national anthem] [Translation] SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-CANADA STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I would like to share some of my concerns about the recent decision [English] by Société Radio-Canada to cancel its late evening sports news. CHABAD Hon. Art Eggleton (York Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise to I am worried, because last year this crown corporation had also decided to stop broadcasting the Saturday night hockey games, La pay tribute to Chabad Lubavitch which is the world's largest network Soirée du hockey.
  • Hill Times, Health Policy Review, 17NOV2014

    Hill Times, Health Policy Review, 17NOV2014

    TWENTY-FIFTH YEAR, NO. 1260 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2014 $4.00 HEARD ON THE HILL BUZZ NEWS HARASSMENT Artist paints Queen, other prominent MPs like ‘kings, queens in their people, wants a national portrait gallery little domains,’ contribute to ‘culture of silence’: Clancy BY LAURA RYCKEWAERT “The combination of power and testosterone often leads, unfortu- n arm’s-length process needs nately, to poor judgment, especially Ato be established to deal in a system where there has been with allegations of misconduct no real process to date,” said Nancy or harassment—sexual and Peckford, executive director of otherwise—on Parliament Hill, Equal Voice Canada, a multi-par- say experts, as the culture on tisan organization focused on the Hill is more conducive to getting more women elected. inappropriate behaviour than the average workplace. Continued on page 14 NEWS HARASSMENT Campbell, Proctor call on two unnamed NDP harassment victims to speak up publicly BY ABBAS RANA Liberal Senator and a former A NDP MP say the two un- identifi ed NDP MPs who have You don’t say: Queen Elizabeth, oil on canvas, by artist Lorena Ziraldo. Ms. Ziraldo said she got fed up that Ottawa doesn’t have accused two now-suspended a national portrait gallery, so started her own, kind of, or at least until Nov. 22. Read HOH p. 2. Photograph courtesy of Lorena Ziraldo Liberal MPs of “serious person- al misconduct” should identify themselves publicly and share their experiences with Canadians, NEWS LEGISLATION arguing that it is not only a ques- tion of fairness, but would also be returns on Monday, as the race helpful to address the issue in a Feds to push ahead on begins to move bills through the transparent fashion.
  • Debating Canada‟S National Holocaust Monument Jason

    Debating Canada‟S National Holocaust Monument Jason

    The Canadianisation of the Holocaust: Debating Canada‟s National Holocaust Monument jason chalmers Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Religious Studies Department of Classics and Religious Studies Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © jason chalmers, Ottawa, Canada, 2013 ii Abstract Holocaust monuments are often catalysts in the „nationalization‟ of the Holocaust – the process by which Holocaust memory is shaped by its national milieu. Between 2009 and 2011, the Parliament of Canada debated a bill which set out the guidelines for the establishment of a National Holocaust Monument (NHM), which ultimately became a federal Act of Parliament in early 2011. I examine the discourse generated by this bill to understand how the memory of the Holocaust is being integrated into the Canadian identity, and argue that the debate surrounding the NHM has been instrumental in the „Canadianisation‟ of the Holocaust. I summarise my findings by placing them into dialogue with other national memories of the Holocaust, and identify three distinct features of Holocaust memory in Canada: a centrifugal trajectory originating in the Jewish community, a particular-universal tension rooted in multiculturalism, and a multifaceted memory comprising several conflicting – though not competing – narratives. Résumé Monuments de l‟Holocauste sont souvent des catalyseurs de la «nationalisation» de l'Holocauste – le processus par lequel mémoire de l'Holocauste est formé par son milieu national. Entre 2009 et 2011, le Parlement du Canada a débattre un projet de loi qui crée les lignes directrices pour la mise en place d'un Monument national de l'Holocauste (MNH), qui est finalement devenu une loi fédérale du Parlement au début de 2011.
  • Core 1..196 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 14.50)

    Core 1..196 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 14.50)

    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 029 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, October 7, 2011 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 1993 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 7, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. We must also build the jobs of the future. This means we must shift to a green economy to stimulate growth, create new jobs, eradicate poverty and limit humanity's ecological footprint. It is no longer a choice between saving our economy and saving the Prayers environment. It is a choice between being a producer and a consumer in the old economy and being a leader in a new economy. It is a choice between decline and prosperity. GOVERNMENT ORDERS Ï (1005) [English] The government should work in partnership with provinces, KEEPING CANADA'S ECONOMY AND JOBS GROWING territories, municipalities, labour organizations, industry sectors, first ACT nations and others to develop a national sustainable energy and The House resumed from October 6 consideration of the motion economic growth strategy to position Canada to succeed in the that Bill C-13, An Act to implement certain provisions of the 2011 global economy. It should develop a clean energy employment budget as updated on June 6, 2011 and other measures, be read the transition for Canada with goals for 2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030. second time and referred to a committee. This strategy should include skills development, training programs and certification courses. Ms. Kirsty Duncan (Etobicoke North, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak to Bill C-13.
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The

    Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The

    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
  • The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction

    The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction

    The Liberals: A House Divided Introduction “I will fulfill my mandate and focus entirely on governing from now until February Focus 2004. At which time my work will be done and at which time my successor will be In an unprec- chosen. And then, at the age of 70, I will look back with great satisfaction as I take edented move against a sitting my rest with Aline, secure in the knowledge that the future of Canada is unlim- Canadian prime ited.” — Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, August 21, 2002 minister, a signifi- cant number of Struggle for Power media and political organizers, the buzz Liberal Party mem- The summer of 2002 will be remem- about his future grew louder and louder. bers appeared The Martin camp was particularly ready to vote bered for both the hot weather and the against Jean equally hot political battle waged within active in promoting their man for the Chrétien in a the ranks of the Liberal Party of next leadership campaign. They built a planned leadership Canada. Open political warfare raged powerful organization and raised sub- review next year. inside the heart of Canada’s most stantial funds. Incensed by this pressure The split in the to leave, Chrétien and Martin had a Liberal camp was successful political machine. A party highlighted this that traditionally rallied around its falling out, and Martin left cabinet. spring when Paul leader appeared ready to tear itself apart Liberals were increasingly divided Martin, one of the over the question of leadership. and feared an open battle at a planned main contenders to After the Liberal victory of 2000, convention to review Chrétien’s leader- replace the PM, attention was drawn to the question of ship in February 2003.
  • Institute for Environmental Studies 2002-03 Annual Report.Pdf

    Institute for Environmental Studies 2002-03 Annual Report.Pdf

    Institute for Environmental Studies University of Toronto 2002/03 ANNUAL REPORT IES online: Environews: www.utoronto.ca/env/ies www.utoronto.ca/env/envnews.htm The IES web site offers up-to-date information on faculty and Available on the web and in hardcopy, this newsletter highlights student research, events, publications, program and course news of IES and the University of Toronto environmental offerings. community. It features articles on faculty and student research, events, publications, courses, and awards. Institute for Environmental Studies Earth Sciences Centre (ESC), 33 Willcocks St., Suite 1016V University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E8 fax: 416-978-3884 Director Acting Director, Rodney White Adaptation and Impacts Research Group Rm. 1021 ESC, 416-978-6526, [email protected] Don MacIver Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada Associate Director, Research 4905 Dufferin St., Downsview, Ont M3H 5T4 Viriginia Maclaren tel: 416-739-4271, fax: 416-739-4297, [email protected] Geography, Rm. 5062 Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George St., 416-978-1594, [email protected] Communications and Director’s Assistant Mona El-Haddad Graduate Coordinator, Rm. 1016V ESC, 416-978-6526, [email protected] Environmental Studies Graduate Program Andy Kenney Business Officer Rm. 1019 ESC, 416-978-0474, [email protected] Laurane Harding Rm. 1016V ESC, 416-978-2584, [email protected] Associate Director, Environment & Health Director, Environment & Health Graduate Program Graduate Student Advisor Frances Silverman Donna Workman Gage Occupational & Environmental Health Unit 223 College St., tel: 416-978-5883, fax: 416-978-2608 Rm. 1022 ESC, 416-978-7077, [email protected] [email protected] October 2003.
  • What to Do About Question Period: a Roundtable

    What to Do About Question Period: a Roundtable

    What to do about Question Period: A Roundtable Michael Chong, MP; Marlene Jennings, MP; Mario Laframboise, MP; Libby Davies, MP; Tom Lukiwski, MP On May 7, 2010 a motion calling for the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs to recommend changes to the Standing Orders and other conventions governing Oral Questions was introduced by the member for Wellington–Halton Hills. Among other things the Committee would consider ways of (i) elevating decorum and fortifying the use of discipline by the Speaker, to strengthen the dignity and authority of the House, (ii) lengthening the amount of time given for each question and each answer, (iii) examining the convention that the Minister questioned need not respond, (iv) allocating half the questions each day for Members, whose names and order of recognition would be randomly selected, (v) dedicating Wednesday exclusively for questions to the Prime Minister, (vi) dedicating Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday for questions to Ministers other than the Prime Minister in a way that would require Ministers be present two of the four days to answer questions concerning their portfolio, based on a published schedule that would rotate and that would ensure an equitable distribution of Ministers across the four days. The motion was debated on May 27, 2010. The following extracts are taken from that debate. Michal Chong (Conservative, Wel- Since this motion was made public, I have received lington–Halton Hills): Canadians phone calls, letters and emails from citizens across know that something is not quite right this country. From Kingston, a proud member of the with their democratic institutions.
  • Complementarity: the Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada

    Complementarity: the Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada

    SENATE SENAT The Honourable V. Peter Harder P.C. L’honorable V. Peter Harder C.P. Government Representative in the Senate Représentant du gouvernement au Sénat CANADA Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada April 12, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 A. Complement to the House: A Constitutional Role Rooted in the 7 Appointive Principle B. In the Senate, Self-Restraint is the Constitutional Watchword 11 C. The Senate’s Power to Amend, Legislate and Influence Public Policy 17 D. We “Ping”, But We Generally Ought not “Pong” 28 E. A Prudent Yet Vigilant Approach to Fiscal and Budgetary Initiatives 30 i. Restricted Access to the Purse Strings 30 ii. A Tradition of Vigilance and Self-Restraint on Confidence and 31 Budgetary Matters iii. The Omnibus Caveats 33 F. The Senate Extraordinary and Rarely Used Power to Defeat 37 Government Legislation G. Democratic Deference to the Government’s Election Platform 41 H. Private Members’ Bills and the Senate’s “Pocket” Veto 47 Epilogue: Better Serving Canadians 49 Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada April 2018 - Page 1 of 51 INTRODUCTION “If we enact legislation speedily, we are called rubber stamps. If we exercise the constitutional authority which the Senate possesses under the British North America Act, we are told that we are doing something that we have no right to do. I do not know how to satisfy our critics.” The late former Senator Carl Goldenberg, Senate Debates of January 11, 1974 Many senators are working hard to close a credibility gap that was created by many difficult years and prove the Senate’s public value as an appointed upper chamber.
  • A Governmental Criminology of Peace Bonds

    A Governmental Criminology of Peace Bonds

    Fighting Fear with Fear: A Governmental Criminology of Peace Bonds Mark D. Doerksen Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Criminology Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Mark D. Doerksen, Ottawa, Canada, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Chapter One – Introduction 1 Chapter Two - Governmental Criminology: Theory and Method 7 I. Introduction . 7 II. Critical Social Science & Critical Legal Studies . 8 III. Foucault & Law . 11 IV. Foucault & Power . 15 V. Foucault, Law & Power . 19 VI. The Limits of Law: Biopower and the Paradox of Law . 20 VII. Foucault, Power, Law and History . 27 VIII. Genealogy and Archaeology . 28 IX. Method . 32 X. Conclusion . 35 Chapter Three - Governmental Analysis of Specialized Peace Bonds: Genealogy 37 I. Introduction . 37 II. Peace Bond Literature . 39 i. Early Peace Bonds . 39 ii. The Canadian Context & Ensuing Legal Debates . 41 iii. Conclusions from and Shortcomings of the Literature’s Doctrinal Approach . .48 III. Socio-Legal Context . 52 i Formation of the State . 53 i.a The Rise and Fall of Welfare . 54 i.b Neoliberalism . 59 ii. The Reflexive Coordination of Governance Through Discourses of Security and Risk . 68 IV. Conclusion . 75 Chapter Four - Governmental Analysis of Specialized Peace Bonds: Archaeology 77 I. Introduction . 77 II. Part I: Bill C-126, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code and the Young Offenders Act; 810.1: Fear of a Sexual Offence, May 6, 1993 - June 23, 1993 . 81 III. Part II: Bill C-55, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (High Risk Offenders, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, The Criminal Records Act, the Prisons and Reformatories Act and the Department of the Solicitor General Act; 810.2: Fear of a Serious Personal Injury Offence, September 17, 1996 - April 25, 1997 .
  • Monday, March 4, 1996

    Monday, March 4, 1996

    CANADA VOLUME 133 S NUMBER 005 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, March 4, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) CORRIGENDUM In the column at left on page 188 of Hansard, Friday March 1, 1996, under ``Government Business'', the mention should read as follows: MOTION NO. 1ĊNOTICE OF MOTION FOR CLOSURE Hon. Alfonso Gagliano (Minister of Labour and Deputy Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, concerning the debate on government Motion No. 1, I give notice that, at the next sitting of the House, I will move that debate be not further adjourned. The House of Commons Debates and the Proceedings of Committee evidence are accessible on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 211 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, March 4, 1996 The House met at 11 a.m. officer of such House in the discharge of his duty, or which has a tendency, directly or indirectly, to produce such results may be treated as contempt even though there is no precedent for the offence. It is therefore impossible to list every act _______________ which might be considered to amount to a contempt, the power to punish for such an offence being of its nature discretionary. Nevertheless, certain broad principles may be deduced from a review of the kinds of misconduct which in the past either Prayers House has punished as a contempt. _______________ On October 29, 1980 a Speaker of this House had this to say: [English] The dimension of contempt of Parliament is such that the House will not be constrained in finding a breach of privileges of members, or of the House.