DOCSLIB.ORG

Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) by Dionysius the Areopagite About Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) by Dionysius the Areopagite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) by Dionysius the Areopagite About Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) by Dionysius the Areopagite Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) by Dionysius the Areopagite About Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) by Dionysius the Areopagite Title: Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/dionysius/works.html Author(s): Dionysius the Areopagite Parker, John (Translator) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Publication History: James Parker and Co, London: 1897 Print Basis: London: James Parker and Co, 1897 Rights: public domain Date Created: 2005-02-14 General Comments: Transcribed by Roger Pearse, Ipswich, UK, 2004 CCEL Subjects: All; Classic; Mysticism Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) Dionysius the Areopagite Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page - Volume 1.. p. 1 Volume 1.. p. 3 Prefatory Material. p. 3 Principal Works on Dionysius the Areopagite. p. 3 Books to Be Read. p. 4 On Divine Names. p. 6 Preface to the ªDivine Names.º. p. 6 On Divine Names. p. 9 Caput I.. p. 9 Caput II.. p. 14 Caput III.. p. 21 Caput IV.. p. 23 Caput V.. p. 41 Caput VI.. p. 46 Caput VII.. p. 47 Caput VIII.. p. 51 Caput IX.. p. 54 Caput X.. p. 58 Caput XI.. p. 59 Caput XII.. p. 63 Caput XIII.. p. 64 Note. p. 66 Mystic Theology. p. 67 Preface to Mystic Theology.. p. 67 Mystic Theology. p. 67 Caput I.. p. 67 Caput II.. p. 69 Caput III.. p. 69 Caput IV.. p. 70 Caput V.. p. 71 Letters. p. 71 Preface to the Letters. p. 71 Letters. p. 72 Letter I. To Gaius Therapeutes.. p. 72 iii Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) Dionysius the Areopagite Letter II. To the same Gaius Therapeutes.. p. 73 Letter III. To the same Gaius.. p. 73 Letter IV. To the same Gaius Therapeutes.. p. 73 Letter V. To Dorotheus, Leitourgos.. p. 74 Letter VI. To SopatrosÐPriest.. p. 74 Letter VII. To PolycarpÐHierarch.. p. 75 Letter VIII. To Demophilus, Therapeutes. About minding ones own business, and kindness.. p. 77 Letter IX. To Titus, Hierarch, asking by letter what is the house of wisdom, what the bowl, and what are its meats and drinks?. p. 84 Letter X. To John, Theologos, Apostle and Evangelist, imprisoned in the Isle of Patmos.. p. 89 Letter XI. Dionysius to Apollophanes, Philosopher.. p. 89 Liturgy. p. 91 Preface to Liturgy. p. 91 Liturgy of St. Dionysius, Bishop of the Athenians. p. 92 Objections to Genuineness. p. 97 Title Page - Volume 2.. p. 101 Volume 2.. p. 102 Prefatory Material. p. 102 Contents. p. 102 Dedication. p. 102 Books to Be Read. p. 102 Dionysius the Areopagite and the Alexandrine School. p. 103 On the Heavenly Hierarchy. p. 110 Caput I.. p. 110 Caput II.. p. 111 Caput III.. p. 116 Caput IV.. p. 117 Caput V.. p. 120 Caput VI.. p. 120 Caput VII.. p. 121 Caput VIII.. p. 124 Caput IX.. p. 126 Caput X.. p. 128 Caput XI.. p. 129 Caput XII.. p. 130 Caput XIII.. p. 131 Caput XIV.. p. 134 Caput XV.. p. 134 iv Dionysius the Areopagite, Works (1897) Dionysius the Areopagite Ecclesiastical Hierarchy. p. 140 Caput I.. p. 140 Caput Ii.. p. 143 Caput III.. p. 149 Caput IV.. p. 159 Caput V.. p. 165 Caput VI.. p. 171 Caput VII.. p. 175 Appendix. p. 183 List of Bishops. p. 183 Apostolic Traditions Generally in Abeyance.. p. 187 Index. p. 187 Indexes. p. 189 Index of Scripture References. p. 189 Greek Words and Phrases. p. 191 Latin Words and Phrases. p. 192 Index of Pages of the Print.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Angels in the Christian Tradition
    Christian Angelology Angels in the Christian Tradition Apostolic Fathers to Early Church (70 – 150AD Epistle of Barnabas (c.75 - 135) Barnabas’ comments on angels are in relation to an evil angel who deceived Israel, (9:4) and reflect the Apostolic Fathers' general mild-dualism worldview between light and darkness. (18:1) 1 Clement (c.95) Angels are mentioned a few times in his argument for Church order. He cites the holy angels for an example of obedience to God’s order, (34:5) while pointing out that some angels chose differently and were condemned. (39:4) One interesting note is his quotation of Deuteronomy 32:8 where he, not surprisingly, follows the LXX reading of “number of the angels”. (29:2) Fragments of Papias (c.100 - 125) Only in one small fragment do we have anything of Papias on angels. The quotation directly relates to the idea of an original angelic rulership of God’s creation. Papias thus speaks, word for word: To some of them [angels] He gave dominion over the arrangement of the world, and He commissioned them to exercise their dominion well. And he says, immediately after this: but it happened that their arrangement came to nothing. (7:1) Letters of Ignatius (c.110) Refers to them as both “angels” and “rulers”. ( Smyrnaeans 6:1) He also holds that there are places and hierarchies of them, but does not elaborate. ( Trallians 5:2) Ignatius states that he knows very little about these due to him still being a learner. Whether this means others may know, or that no one truly knows, is a bit unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revelation of God, East and West: Contrasting Special Revelation in Western Modernity with the Ancient Christian East
    Open Theology 2017; 3: 565–589 Analytic Perspectives on Method and Authority in Theology Nathan A. Jacobs* The Revelation of God, East and West: Contrasting Special Revelation in Western Modernity with the Ancient Christian East https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0043 Received August 11, 2017; accepted September 11, 2017 Abstract: The questions of whether God reveals himself; if so, how we can know a purported revelation is authentic; and how such revelations relate to the insights of reason are discussed by John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, René Descartes, G. W. Leibniz, and Immanuel Kant, to name a few. Yet, what these philosophers say with such consistency about revelation stands in stark contrast with the claims of the Christian East, which are equally consistent from the second century through the fourteenth century. In this essay, I will compare the modern discussion of special revelation from Thomas Hobbes through Johann Fichte with the Eastern Christian discussion from Irenaeus through Gregory Palamas. As we will see, there are noteworthy differences between the two trajectories, differences I will suggest merit careful consideration from philosophers of religion. Keywords: Religious Epistemology; Revelation; Divine Vision; Theosis; Eastern Orthodox; Locke; Hobbes; Lessing; Kant; Fichte; Irenaeus; Cappadocians; Cyril of Alexandria; Gregory Palamas The idea that God speaks to humanity, revealing things hidden or making his will known, comes under careful scrutiny in modern philosophy. The questions of whether God does reveal himself; if so, how we can know a purported revelation is authentic; and how such revelations relate to the insights of reason are discussed by John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, René Descartes, G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : Philosophical Terminology and Theological Arguments
    Durham E-Theses The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : philosophical terminology and theological arguments Metallidis, George How to cite: Metallidis, George (2003) The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : philosophical terminology and theological arguments, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1085/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY GEORGE METALLIDIS The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consentand information derived from it should be acknowledged. The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene: Philosophical Terminology and Theological Arguments PhD Thesis/FourthYear Supervisor: Prof. ANDREW LOUTH 0-I OCT2003 Durham 2003 The ChalcedonianChristology of St John Damascene To my Mother Despoina The ChalcedonianChristology of St John Damascene CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 12 INTRODUCTION 14 CHAPTER ONE TheLife of St John Damascene 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing Icons: the Face of Jacob on the Throne of God*
    Images 2007_f13_36-54 8/13/07 5:19 PM Page 36 RACHEL NEIS University of Michigan EMBRACING ICONS: THE FACE OF JACOB ON THE THRONE OF GOD* Abstract I bend over it, embrace, kiss and fondle to it, Rachel Neis’ article treats Hekhalot Rabbati, a collection of early and my hands are upon its arms, Jewish mystical traditions, and more specifically §§ 152–169, a three times, when you speak before me “holy.” series of Qedusha hymns. These hymns are liturgical performances, As it is said: holy, holy, holy.1 the highlight of which is God’s passionate embrace of the Jacob icon Heikhalot Rabbati, § 164 on his throne as triggered by Israel’s utterance of the Qedusha. §§ 152–169 also set forth an ocular choreography such that the For over a century, scholars conceived of the relation- gazes of Israel and God are exchanged during the recitation of the ship between visuality in Judaism and Christianity Qedusha. The article set these traditions within the history of sim- in binary terms.2 Judaism was understood as a reli- ilar Jewish traditions preserved in Rabbinic literature. It will be argued that §§ 152–169 date to the early Byzantine period, reflecting gion of the word in opposition to Christianity, a Jewish interest in images of the sacred parallel to the contempo- which was seen as a deeply visual culture. For raneous Christian intensification of the cult of images and preoccupation many scholars, never the twain did meet—Jews with the nature of religious images. were always “the nation without art,” or “artless,”3 while for much of their history Christians embraced Bear witness to them 4 5 of what testimony you see of me, icons, creating visual representations of the divine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Synoptic Question
    411 A SURVEY OF THE SYNOPTIC QUESTION. V. NEW HYPOTHESES (contin?ted). WE have as yet done little more than cross the threshold of the treasure-house into which we are conducted by Dr. Resch. Something has been said very inadequately of his attempt, which runs parallel to Prof. Marshall's, to get back to an Aramaic original lying behind the various Greek versions of evangelical sayings current in the early cen­ turies. This however, though of course an important feature in his book, is hardly that which is most distinctive about it. Mr. Marshall operates chiefly with the canonical text; it is characteristic of Dr. Resch that he takes a wider range. His present work, it must be remembered, is only an instalment. It is to be followed by another, deal­ ing in like manner with extra-canonical sayings.1 When the two books are complete, they will form an enormous repertory of sayings rightly or wrongly attributed to Christ. It is not surprising that these researches should have occupied, as we are told, five and twenty years. We are reminded in some measure of the thirty years spent by the Cambridge editors over the monumental work which appeared about the same time as the Revised Version of the New Testament. Dr. Resch too has a most substantial result to show for his labours. They bear the marks of prolonged study, as well as of diligence in collecting. The work which he now offers to the world, although it has evidently grown under his hand, is thoroughly digested work.
    [Show full text]
  • Preaching Christ in a Pagan Culture (Part 4) Acts 17
    Series: Code Red: The Coming Storm Message 9 - Preaching Christ in a Pagan Culture (Part 4) Acts 17: 15-34 INTRODUCTION: We are gleaning principles that will guide us through the storm giving us a strategy for living in a culture that is antagonistic and hostile to Christianity. We are “watching” Paul as he models the behavior of a believer in a non- Christian environment. Acts 17: 15-34 ESV 15 Those who conducted Paul brought him as far as Athens, and after receiving a command for Silas and Timothy to come to him as soon as possible, they departed. 16 Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. 17 So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. 18 Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. 19 And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? 20 For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” 21 Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of Origen in the Hexaemeron by Anastasius Sinaita Between Criticism and Approval*
    EphemeridesTheologicaeLovanienses 95/3 (2019) 415-426. doi: 10.2143/ETL.95.3.3286794 © 2019 by Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. All rights reserved. The Reception of Origen in the Hexaemeron by Anastasius Sinaita Between Criticism and Approval* Dimitrios ZAGANAS KU Leuven In his SpiritualAnagogyoftheHexaemeralCreation (CPG 7770, here- after: Hexaemeron)1, Anastasius of Sinai frequently appeals to the early Fathers, as a group and individually2, in support of his distinctly spiritual exegesis of Gen 1–3. In all such cases the name of Origen is conspicuously absent3, although he was (among) the first to comment extensively on Gen- esis and was best known for his allegorical approach to the Bible. It is certainly plausible that Origen’s sixth-century condemnation as heretic has made it impossible to appeal to him as an ancient Christian authority with- out being accused of Origenism. Would this have made it instead neces- sary to openly criticize and even denigrate him? Anastasius’ Hexaemeron contains several references to Origen, most of which are explicit and critical. At the same time, less explicit references imply that Anastasius had some access to Origen’s works on Genesis, whilst his proposed method of interpretation shows acquaintance with Origen’s method. To be sure, the reception of Origen by Anastasius is complex and needs a special study4. In this article, I shall briefly examine Anastasius’ ambivalent (and perhaps deceptive) attitude towards Origen, in order to uncover and assess ∗ This article is a revised and extended version of a paper presented at the Origeniana Duodecima:Origen’sLegacyintheHolyLand–ATaleofThreeCities:Jerusalem,Cae- sareaandBethleheminLateAntiquity, Jerusalem, June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Bogdan Gabriel Bucur, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Theology Duquesne University, Department of Theology
    Bogdan Gabriel Bucur, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Theology Duquesne University, Department of Theology E-mail: [email protected] Academia page: duq.academia.edu/BogdanGabrielBucur AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AND RESEARCH Jewish Roots of Early Christology and Pneumatology; Biblical Exegesis and Doctrinal Developments in Early Christianity; Byzantine Theology and Hymnography. EDUCATION Ph.D. in Religious Studies, Marquette University 2002–2007 MA in Theology, Marquette University 2000–2002 Ph.D. Coursework in Patristics, University of Bucharest, Romania 1998–2000 MA in Biblical Studies, University of Bucharest, Romania 1998–1999 Studies in Orthodox Theology, University of Bucharest, Romania 1995–1998 ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT Associate Professor of Theology, Duquesne University 2012— Assistant Professor of Theology, Duquesne University 2007–2012 Teaching Fellow, Marquette University 2005–2006 Teaching Assistant, Marquette University 2000–2005 PUBLICATIONS Books Authored Scripture Re-Envisioned: Christophanic Exegesis and the Making of a Christian Bible. Leiden/ Boston: Brill, 2018. Angelomorphic Pneumatology: Clement of Alexandria and Other Early Christian Witnesses. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 95. Leiden/ Boston: Brill, 2009. Edited Alexander Golitzin with Bogdan G. Bucur, Mystagogy: A Monastic Reading of Dionysius Areopagita. Edited by Bogdan G. Bucur. Minneapolis, MN: Cistercian Publications, 2013. Journal Articles "Condescension, Anticipation, Reciprocal Ecstasies: Theological Reflections on the Early Christian Reading of Isaiah 6 and Daniel 3," Scottish Journal of Theology 71 (2018): 425-440. "A Blind Spot in the Study of Fourth-Century Christian Theology: The Christological Exegesis of Theophanies," Journal of Theological Studies 69 (2018): 588-610. "God Never Appeared to Moses": Eusebius of Caesarea’s Peculiar Exegesis of the Burning Bush Theophany," Journal of the Bible and its Reception 5 (2018): 235-258.
    [Show full text]
  • Clement of Alexandria Epiphanius (Κατὰ Μαρκιωνιστῶν 29; Cf
    Verbum et Ecclesia ISSN: (Online) 2074-7705, (Print) 1609-9982 Page 1 of 11 Original Research Documents written by the heads of the Catechetical School in Alexandria: From Mark to Clement Author: The Catechetical School in Alexandria has delivered a number of prolific scholars and writers 1 Willem H. Oliver during the first centuries of the Common Era, up to its demise by the end of the 4th century. Affiliation: These scholars have produced an extensive collection of documents of which not many are 1Department of Christian extant. Fortunately, there are many references to these documents supplying us with an idea Spirituality, Church History of the content thereof. As the author could not find one single source containing all the and Missiology, University of documents written by the heads of the School, he deemed it necessary to list these documents, South Africa, South Africa together with a short discussion of it where possible. This article only discusses the writings of Corresponding author: the following heads: Mark the Evangelist, Athenagoras, Pantaenus and Clement, covering the Willem Oliver, period between approximately 40 CE and the end of the 2nd century. The follow-up article [email protected] discusses the documents of the heads who succeeded them. Dates: Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The potential results of the proposed Received: 02 May 2017 Accepted: 16 Aug. 2017 research are a full detailed list of all the documents being written by the heads of the School in Published: 10 Nov. 2017 Alexandria. The disciplines involved are (Church) History, Theology and Antiquity. These results will make it easier for future researchers to work on these writers.
    [Show full text]
  • B20, CC on Paul in Athens (Acts 17.22...)
    Excerpts from a B. Cobbey Crisler Talk on Paul’s at Athens (Acts 17:14-34) from “After the Master, What? The Book of Acts” [With permission from the transcriber, Sue Merrill] Well, now Paul is heading for the cultural capital of civilization, Athens. And you can’t even go to modern day Athens without appreciating somewhat of what Paul saw, looking around at the remnants of that great city and “the columned buildings that were dedicated to so many gods. It must have moved Paul.” (See below, Acts 17:15, 16, paraphrased) It sounds like he wasn’t going to say anything until his companions, “Silas and Timothy joined him.” (See below, Acts 17:15, paraphrased) Acts 17:14 And then immediately the brethren sent away Paul to go as it were to the sea: but Silas and Timotheus abode there still. Acts 17:15 And they that conducted Paul brought him unto Athens: and receiving a commandment unto Silas and Timotheus for to come to him with all speed, they departed. Acts 17:16 Now while Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry. “But, he was stirred – his spirit was stirred within him.” (above paraphrased) And so he opens his mouth and begins right away to talk in Athens. Now this is a tough area in which to introduce Christianity, except at least they were willing to listen because everybody talked about anything. I mean there were a lot of weirdo sects and ideas that they welcomed without question in Athens because everybody liked to dispute these ideas anyway.
    [Show full text]
  • “Up and Out” to the “Down and Out” Acts 18:1-4 the Response to the Gospel Is Often So Varied
    “Up and Out” to the “Down and Out” Acts 18:1-4 The response to the Gospel is often so varied. The response that Paul received at Mars Hill at the end of Acts 17 would actually be considered odd and even tame for the Apostle. But for many of us, as we share the Gospel, that reaction would actually be quite normal. Do you remember how they responded? After his message on Mars Hill? Some mocked, Some wanted to hear more, and Some actually believed and followed (Acts 17:32-34). What I do find interesting in Athens‘ response: there was no riot or revolt. Surprising, particularly when you look at previous responses to Paul’s preaching and teaching as he went from city to city. Don’t forget, just through the First Missionary Journey and the earlier part of this Second Journey, Paul had already been: Kicked out of some cities, Snuck out of one city in a basket over the wall, Threatened by many, Attacked in synagogues and marketplaces, Attacked by both Jews and Gentiles, Stoned and left for dead, Beaten with rods, Placed in shackles and spent at least one night in the inner recesses of a prison. That’s why, when you look at the comparison to what previously happened, the results we read from Athens seem pretty tame indeed: Some mocked, some wanted to hear more, and some actually believed and followed. 1 As a matter of fact, through the years, many have actually wondered, “Was Paul’s ministry in Athens a failure?” I honestly believe that Dionysius the Areopagite, the woman named Damaris, and others with them would beg to differ.
    [Show full text]
  • God, Hierarchy, and Power: Orthodox Theologies of Authority from Byzantium Ashley M
    Christian Social Thought and the whims of political fashion. Sadly, we have lost in Nelson a unique and insightful guide to what will be a fascinating journey of economic change as the environmental and progressive agenda evolves. — David Cowan Maynooth University, Ireland God, Hierarchy, and Power: Orthodox Theologies of Authority from Byzantium Ashley M. Purpura New York: Fordham University Press, 2018 (226 pages) In God, Hierarchy, and Power, Ashley M. Purpura seeks to demonstrate how the Byzantine tradition of hierarchical theology situates all true power as derivative of God and that these “theological ideals of hierarchy and power … have great relevance for contemporary Orthodox Christian conversations engaging the exclusive, inclusive, and power-based challenges of hierarchy” (17). Largely a work of historical theology, Purpura’s book dedicates one chapter each to the life and work of four Byzantine theologians: (Pseudo-) Dionysius the Areopagite, St. Maximus the Confessor, St. Niketas Stethatos, and St. Nicolas Cabasilas. Her last chapter puts the common contours of the Byzantine thearchical conception of power and hierarchy in dialogue with modern theorists of power, namely Karl Marx, Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault, and Judith Butler. While the constructive content in her final chapter and conclusion is less careful than her historical work that precedes it, I recommend the book for its contribution to historical theology. Purpura sums up the extent and limitations of power across her four historical sources as follows: “Each author limits the authority of the visible earthly hierarchy and its indi- vidual members when its participants are not believed to communicate divinity. Moreover, Dionysius, Maximus, Stethatos, and Cabasilas directly and indirectly identify power as residing in the relational activity of communicating divinity rather than inhering in a particular office or human person based on ecclesiastical position” (132).
    [Show full text]