Embracing Icons: the Face of Jacob on the Throne of God*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Embracing Icons: the Face of Jacob on the Throne of God* Images 2007_f13_36-54 8/13/07 5:19 PM Page 36 RACHEL NEIS University of Michigan EMBRACING ICONS: THE FACE OF JACOB ON THE THRONE OF GOD* Abstract I bend over it, embrace, kiss and fondle to it, Rachel Neis’ article treats Hekhalot Rabbati, a collection of early and my hands are upon its arms, Jewish mystical traditions, and more specifically §§ 152–169, a three times, when you speak before me “holy.” series of Qedusha hymns. These hymns are liturgical performances, As it is said: holy, holy, holy.1 the highlight of which is God’s passionate embrace of the Jacob icon Heikhalot Rabbati, § 164 on his throne as triggered by Israel’s utterance of the Qedusha. §§ 152–169 also set forth an ocular choreography such that the For over a century, scholars conceived of the relation- gazes of Israel and God are exchanged during the recitation of the ship between visuality in Judaism and Christianity Qedusha. The article set these traditions within the history of sim- in binary terms.2 Judaism was understood as a reli- ilar Jewish traditions preserved in Rabbinic literature. It will be argued that §§ 152–169 date to the early Byzantine period, reflecting gion of the word in opposition to Christianity, a Jewish interest in images of the sacred parallel to the contempo- which was seen as a deeply visual culture. For raneous Christian intensification of the cult of images and preoccupation many scholars, never the twain did meet—Jews with the nature of religious images. were always “the nation without art,” or “artless,”3 while for much of their history Christians embraced Bear witness to them 4 5 of what testimony you see of me, icons, creating visual representations of the divine. of what I do to the features of the face of Jacob In less than a decade this constructed chasm has their father, been bridged by scholars presenting ever more which is engraved for me on the throne of my nuanced accounts of the formation of Jewish and glory. Christian identities as they pertain to the visual.6 For at the time that you say before me “holy,” Despite these important inroads, the depiction of * I owe a great debt of gratitude to Steven Fine for the eds. Adam H. Becker and Annette Yoshiko Reed, (Tübingen: exhaustive and constructive criticism and advice that he offered Mohr Siebeck, 2003) at each stage of this article’s production. My thanks go to 3 For these appellations see footnote 6. the participants of the Religions of Late Antiquity Workshop, 4 It should be noticed that the term icon, or eikon, is sim- Princeton University, on “Making Selves and Marking Others: ply one Greek word for image. It is intended here (and in Heresy and Self-Definition in Late Antiquity,” (Fall 2005) for much scholarly literature of this period) to refer to images of their responses to the earliest version of this paper. I am the sacred. especially grateful to Holger Zellentin and Peter Schäfer for 5 The literature on the role of images in Christianity is too their copious comments and encouragement. My apprecia- vast to cite here. For early Christianity see Robin Margaret tion goes to the anonymous readers of this article for their Jensen, Understanding early Christian Art, (New York: Routledge, helpful corrections and critique. Thanks to Rahanan Boustan 2000) and the bibliography in Paul C. Finney, The Invisible for his careful reading of this piece and for his generous God: The Earliest Christians on Art, (New York: Oxford University observations and conversation. Finally, many thanks go to Press, 1994) For Byzantine Christian art, see Robin Cormack, Madeline Kochen for helping me to clarify my thoughts and Byzantine Art, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000) Still the literary expressions thereof. All errors are mine. excellent resources are André Grabar’s, Christian Iconography: 1 Heikhalot Rabbati, § 164, Peter Schäfer, ed., Synopse zur a Study of its Origins, trans. Terry Grabar, (Princeton: Princeton Hekhalot-Literatur, (Tübingen: Mohr, 1981). University Press, 1968) and his Early Christian Art; from the rise 2 Indeed, the same thinking has often been applied to the of Christianity to the death of Theodosius, trans. Stuart Gilbert and relationship between Judaism and Christianity more gener- James Emmons, (New York: Odyssey Press, 1969). For a cor- ally speaking. See Daniel Boyarin, Dying for God: Martyrdom rective to the notion that Christians opposed images in the and the Making of Christianity and Judaism, (Stanford: Stanford first centuries due to inheriting a “rigorism” inherited from University Press, 1999) and Borderlines: The Partition of Judaeo- the Jews, see Finney. Christianity, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 6 For recent work on Jewish visuality and art see Kalman 2004) for a deconstruction of the binary pair “Judaism/ P. Bland, The Artless Jew: Medieval and Modern Affirmations and Christianity.” See also the essays in The Ways That Never Parted: Denials of the Visual, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, 2000); Margaret Olin, The Nation Without Art: Examining Modern © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2007 IMAGES 1 Also available online – www.brill.nl Images 2007_f13_36-54 8/13/07 5:19 PM Page 37 embracing icons: the face of jacob on the throne of god 37 the Jew as iconophobe has proven remarkably In this article I suggest that a tradition in durable, particularly in analyses of Jewish culture Heikhalot Rabbati §§ 152–169, and particularly in the early Byzantine period.7 § 164, should be viewed as a Jewish “contribu- Starting in the sixth and seventh centuries, tion” to the Byzantine sixth and seventh century Christians debated about visual and material rep- preoccupation with images of the sacred. It is one resentations of the sacred. In some of the pro-icon that upsets the binary inaugurated by the con- dialogues and narratives that date to this period, temporaneous Christian texts. This tradition, in the Jew was invoked as an attacker of Christian which God relates to the image of Jacob’s face, images and image treatment.8 The Jewish icono- will be set within the history of similar traditions phobe was presented as attacking the veneration preserved in Rabbinic literature. of images on the basis of the Bible’s prohibition The figure of the Jew as iconophobe was a against idolatry. Even those scholars who have cast valuable tool in Christian identity formation and doubt upon these sources as accurate representa- the construction of orthodoxy.10 It is possible that tions of contemporaneous Jews have not necessarily the Heikhalot tradition is a Jewish attempt to appro- placed them next to Jewish articulations about the priate iconophilic imagery to make claims about investment of sanctity in images.9 Jewish legitimacy in the Byzantine world. It can Discourses on Jewish Art, (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, was the aniconic sensibility (in religious contexts) of the Islamic 2002). See relevant discussion and bibliography in the two powers. I would argue that the Heikhalot text under analysis latter works (Bland and Olin) on scholarly historical and art in the article supports Fine’s nuanced reading of the more historical binaries about Jews, Christians and art. See Catherine complex Jewish sensibilities regarding images in the Byzantine Soussloff, Jewish Identity in Modern Art History, (Berkeley: University period. See Lee Levine, “Between Rome and Byzantium in of California Press, 1999). Most recently Steven Fine has Jewish History: Documentation, Reality, and the Issue of reopened the discussion on the relationship between art and Periodization,” in Continuity and Renewal: Jews and Judaism in Judaism in late antiquity. See Steven Fine, Art and Judaism in Byzantine-Christian Palestine, ed. L. I. Levine, ( Jerusalem; Yad the Greco-Roman World: Towards a New Jewish Archaeology, Ben-Zvi, 2004): 7–48. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005). Fine under- 8 See e.g. Stephen of Bostra, Contra Judaeos, preserved in stands Jewish conceptions of art to have been fashioned John of Damascus in his Third Oration, PG 77, 217–220, differently in different periods and environments, allowing the and On the Divine Images, trans. David Anderson, (Crestwood: creation of shifting and permeable boundaries through the St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997), 96–96; Pseudo-Athanasius categories of “idolatry,” “forbidden” and “permissible.” Using Quaestiones ad Antiochum Ducem, (Migne, PG, 28, 597–709); this understanding Fine has managed to get past the red her- N. Bontwetsch, ed, Doctrina Jacobi, 1910; Gustave Bardy, ed. ring that the prohibition against idolatry so often presents. “Tropaia kata loudaion en Damasko” Patrologia orientalis, In my own work I have examined visuality in Rabbinic vol. 15. (Paris 1927): 189–275, 245; A.C. McGiffert, ed., Culture in Palestine and Persia placing it within the history Dialogue of Papiscus and Philo, (Marburg, 1889). Two seventh of late antique visuality. See Rachel Neis, In the Eyes of the century narratives (one about a Christ icon, set in Beirut; the Rabbis: Vision and Visuality in Late Antique Rabbinic Culture, (Phd other about an icon of the Virgin Mary set in Egypt) tell of diss., Harvard University, 2007). Jews who damage icons, which then miraculously bleed. Both 7 By “early Byzantine period” 330—circa 700 CE is intended. tales end up with the conversion of the Jews. See Sermo de By “Byzantine” the eastern half of the Roman empire is miraculo Beryti edito, (PG 28:797A–805B) and W. H. Worrell, meant. Charles Barber takes the position outlined and accord- The Coptic Manuscripts in the Freer Collection, (New York, 1923), ingly would date the iconoclasm found in the synagogues of 370. See E. Kitzinger, “The Cult of Images in the Age Before Palestine (in particular, iconoclasm directed at living figures Iconoclasm,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 8, (1954): 83–149 (espe- in the synagogue of Naharan) to the same period.
Recommended publications
  • Kingship. Coronation, and Covenant in Mosiah 1–6
    Kingship. Coronation, and Covenant in Mosiah 1–6 Stephen D. Ricks The rst six chapters of Mosiah contain King Benjamin’s farewell address—one of the most memorable sermons on record. These chapters also portray for us the succession of Mosiah2 to the Nephite throne. Many features of this coronation ceremony reect ancient Israelite culture. First is the signicance of the ofce of king. Second is the coronation ceremony for the new king—the details of which have parallels in both Israel and other ancient Near Eastern societies and even in other parts of the world. Third, the order of events reported in these chapters reects the “treaty/covenant” pattern well-known in ancient Israel and the ancient Near East. Finally, an interrelated cluster of concepts in Israelite religion connects the themes of rising from the dust, enthronement, kingship, and resurrection. My discussion of these four sets of features will show how faithfully the Book of Mormon reects these Old World practices and beliefs. KINGSHIP The Meaning of Kingship Although kingship is a political institution whose origins are lost to history, nearly every ancient and medieval civilization had a king who was believed to have been appointed by heaven. The Egyptians held that kingship had existed as long as the world itself;1 to the Sumerians, this form of rule was a gift from the gods.2 The Israelites also believed that the king was appointed and adopted by God and that “he mediated between God and the people and represented them before each other.”3 Although the Nephite king was never viewed as a divine being (which would be inconsistent with Deuteronomy 17:15), he was closely connected with God in the sense that, as an intermediate, he too modeled and represented God to his people (as in Mosiah 2:19).
    [Show full text]
  • If Angels Do Not Have a Gender Then How Come They Have Boys Names?
    If angels do not have a gender then how come they have boys names? It is true that we believe that angels do not have gender. Angels unlike human beings are pure spirit. This is why when people say that a human being has become an angel in heaven that is incorrect. Any human being in heaven is a saint. It is true that human beings until the resurrection of the dead while in heaven only contain their spiritual nature. But when Christ comes again, and the resurrection of the dead occurs at that moment human beings will become complete joining the physical and spiritual together in heaven. Hence, angels and human beings are not simply a different species they are different order of creation. As such angels can never become human and humans can never become angels. But when angels have been revealed to human beings, they taken on the appearance of somewhat human form. They did this in order for human beings to be able to comprehend the message that is being given to them from God. The word angel means messenger. And each angel has a specific function to perform based on their rank. There are nine ranks of angels: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominions, Virtues, Powers, Principalities, Archangels and Angels. Seraphim are caretakers to the throne of God and lead the worship of God in heaven. Cherubim guard the tree of life and the throne of God. Thrones are living symbols of God’s justice and authority and listening to the will of God present the prayers of human beings to Him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revelation of God, East and West: Contrasting Special Revelation in Western Modernity with the Ancient Christian East
    Open Theology 2017; 3: 565–589 Analytic Perspectives on Method and Authority in Theology Nathan A. Jacobs* The Revelation of God, East and West: Contrasting Special Revelation in Western Modernity with the Ancient Christian East https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0043 Received August 11, 2017; accepted September 11, 2017 Abstract: The questions of whether God reveals himself; if so, how we can know a purported revelation is authentic; and how such revelations relate to the insights of reason are discussed by John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, René Descartes, G. W. Leibniz, and Immanuel Kant, to name a few. Yet, what these philosophers say with such consistency about revelation stands in stark contrast with the claims of the Christian East, which are equally consistent from the second century through the fourteenth century. In this essay, I will compare the modern discussion of special revelation from Thomas Hobbes through Johann Fichte with the Eastern Christian discussion from Irenaeus through Gregory Palamas. As we will see, there are noteworthy differences between the two trajectories, differences I will suggest merit careful consideration from philosophers of religion. Keywords: Religious Epistemology; Revelation; Divine Vision; Theosis; Eastern Orthodox; Locke; Hobbes; Lessing; Kant; Fichte; Irenaeus; Cappadocians; Cyril of Alexandria; Gregory Palamas The idea that God speaks to humanity, revealing things hidden or making his will known, comes under careful scrutiny in modern philosophy. The questions of whether God does reveal himself; if so, how we can know a purported revelation is authentic; and how such revelations relate to the insights of reason are discussed by John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, René Descartes, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Investiture of the Monarch: the European Context
    Religion and the investiture of the Monarch: The European context NSS researcher Barry Thorpe has found no other investiture of a European monarch with such overt religious, far less sectarian, associations as in the UK. Denmark Last coronation: 1849 In 1660 the coronation ritual was replaced with a ceremony of anointing, where the new king would arrive at the coronation site already wearing the crown, where he was then anointed. This rite was in turn abolished with the introduction of the Danish Constitution in 1849. Today the crown of Denmark is only displayed at the monarch's funeral, when it sits atop their coffin. The present Queen, Margrethe II, did not have any formal enthronement service; a public announcement of her accession was made from the balcony of Christiansborg Palace, with the new sovereign being acclaimed by her Prime Minister at the time (1972), Jens Otto Krag, then cheered with a ninefold "hurrah" by the crowds below. Liechtenstein No coronation Liechtenstein does not use a coronation or enthronement ceremony, although Prince Hans Adam II did attend a mass by the Archbishop of Vaduz, followed by a choral event. Luxembourg No coronation The Grand Duke of Luxembourg is enthroned at a ceremony held in the nation's parliament at the beginning of his or her reign. The monarch takes an oath of loyalty to the state constitution, then attends a solemn mass at the Notre-Dame Cathedral. Netherlands No coronation. Inauguration With the absence of any religious hierarchy within the Dutch Reformed Church, there is no senior religious prelate to crown the new monarch, unlike in Great Britain under the Archbishop of Canterbury.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 7A FINAL (GENERAL Or LAST) JUDGMENT
    Lesson 7A FINAL (GENERAL or LAST) JUDGMENT Beloved Father of Mercy and Justice, We Your children, offer our lives as a pure and holy sacrifice, uniting our lives and our death to the life and death of Your Son and our Savior. At the Final Judgment we will stand united with the Body of Christ, body and soul, to receive Your Son's judgment. We will face this last and definitive judgment unafraid as the Books of Works are opened to reveal the imperishable deeds of love and mercy accumulated by the Church. This is the treasure stored up for eternity which Your children offer in the name of Christ our Savior and Redeemer. Send Your Holy Spirit, Lord, to lead us in this lesson of our study on the Eight Last Things. We pray in the name of God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen. + + + While I was watching thrones were set in place and one most venerable took his seat. His robe was white as snow, the hair of his head as pure as wool. His throne was a blaze of flames; its wheels were a burning fire. A stream of fire poured out, issuing from his presence. A thousand thousand waited on him, ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him. The court was in session and the books lay open. Daniel 7:9-10 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself; and, because he is the Son of man, has granted him power to give judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ave Papa Ave Papabile the Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations
    FROM THE CENTRE FOR REFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES Ave Papa Ave Papabile The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations LILIAN H. ZIRPOLO In 1624 Pope Urban VIII appointed Marcello Sacchetti as depositary general and secret treasurer of the Apostolic Cham- ber, and Marcello’s brother, Giulio, bishop of Gravina. Urban later gave Marcello the lease on the alum mines of Tolfa and raised Giulio to the cardinalate. To assert their new power, the Sacchetti began commissioning works of art. Marcello discov- ered and promoted leading Baroque masters, such as Pietro da Cortona and Nicolas Poussin, while Giulio purchased works from previous generations. In the eighteenth century, Pope Benedict XIV bought the collection and housed it in Rome’s Capitoline Museum, where it is now a substantial portion of the museum’s collection. By focusing on the relationship between the artists in ser- vice and the Sacchetti, this study expands our knowledge of the artists and the complexity of the processes of agency in the fulfillment of commissions. In so doing, it underlines how the Sacchetti used art to proclaim a certain public image and to announce Cardinal Giulio’s candidacy to the papal throne. ______ copy(ies) Ave Papa Ave Papabile Payable by cheque (to Victoria University - CRRS) ISBN 978-0-7727-2028-2 or by Visa/Mastercard $24.50 Name as on card ___________________________________ (Outside Canada, please pay in US $.) Visa/Mastercard # _________________________________ Price includes applicable taxes. Expiry date _____________ Security code ______________ Send form with cheque/credit card Signature ________________________________________ information to: Publications, c/o CRRS Name ___________________________________________ 71 Queen’s Park Crescent East Address __________________________________________ Toronto, ON M5S 1K7 Canada __________________________________________ The Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies Victoria College in the University of Toronto Tel: 416-585-4465 Fax: 416-585-4430 [email protected] www.crrs.ca .
    [Show full text]
  • The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : Philosophical Terminology and Theological Arguments
    Durham E-Theses The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : philosophical terminology and theological arguments Metallidis, George How to cite: Metallidis, George (2003) The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : philosophical terminology and theological arguments, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1085/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY GEORGE METALLIDIS The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consentand information derived from it should be acknowledged. The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene: Philosophical Terminology and Theological Arguments PhD Thesis/FourthYear Supervisor: Prof. ANDREW LOUTH 0-I OCT2003 Durham 2003 The ChalcedonianChristology of St John Damascene To my Mother Despoina The ChalcedonianChristology of St John Damascene CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 12 INTRODUCTION 14 CHAPTER ONE TheLife of St John Damascene 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysteries of the Throne of God Revealed Our Mission
    The Mysteries of the Throne of God Revealed Our Mission: To take as many people to Heaven as we can before we die. Period. 1. God Himself is on His throne being worshipped. ​ ​ Then as I looked, I saw a door standing open in heaven, and the same voice I had heard before spoke to me like a trumpet blast. The voice said, "Come up here, and I will show you what must happen after this." And instantly I was in the Spirit, and I saw a throne in heaven and someone sitting on it. The one sitting on the throne was as brilliant as gemstones—like jasper and carnelian. And the glow of an emerald circled his throne like a rainbow. Revelation 4:1-3 NLT ​ 2. The 24 elders are representatives of God's entire people: Either 12 Tribes of Israel and ​ ​ ​ ​ the 12 apostles, or it can be seen as the 24 courses of Jewish priesthood. Why can't it be ​ ​ ​ ​ both? Twenty-four thrones surrounded him, and twenty-four elders sat on them. They were all clothed in white and had gold crowns on their heads. From the throne came flashes of lightning and the rumble of thunder. And in front of the throne were seven torches with burning flames. This is the sevenfold Spirit of God. In front of the throne was a shiny sea of glass, sparkling like crystal. Revelation 4:4-6a NLT He will rule in great glory in Jerusalem, in the sight of all the leaders of his people. Isaiah 24:23 NLT And the Spirit of the LORD will rest on him—the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit ​ ​ ​ ​ of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protestant Succession to the Throne and Its Importance to the Church of England Today Churchman 93/4 1979
    The Protestant Succession to the Throne and its Importance to the Church of England Today Churchman 93/4 1979 David N. Samuel What is the Protestant Succession to the Throne of England? To answer this question we must go back to the Reformation itself. Throughout the Middle Ages and until the time of the Reformation, the supremacy of the pope was acknowledged throughout Christendom; i.e., in all matters relating to the faith and practice of the church, the Bishop of Rome was the supreme authority who commanded absolute obedience. The advent of Luther with his appeal to Scripture as the supreme authority changed all that. His actual words at the Diet of Worms in 1521 were: Unless I am convinced by testimonies of the Scripture, or by evident reason—for I neither believe the Pope nor the Councils alone, since it is clear that they have often erred and contradicted one another—I am overcome by the Scriptures I have quoted, and my conscience is taken captive by the words of God, and I neither can nor will retract anything, since it is neither safe nor right to act against conscience.1 The Protestantism of the princes and Reformers at the Diet of Speier in 1529 took this principle a step further. The principle enunciated by Luther at Worms was the duty of abiding by the authority of conscience under the supreme guidance and authority of the Word of God, and of not yielding in such matters to any human authority or majority. But at Worms it was merely the assertion of an individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology Today
    Theology Today volume 67, N u m b e r 2 j u l y 2 0 1 0 EDITORIAL Christmas in July 123 JAMES F. KAY ARTICLES American Scriptures 127 C. CLIFTON BLACK Christian Spirituality in a Time of Ecological Awareness 169 KATHLEEN FISCHER The “New Monasticism” as Ancient-Future Belonging 182 PHILIP HARROLD Sexuality as Sacrament: An Evangelical Reads Andrew Greeley 194 ANTHONY L. BLAIR THEOLOGICAL TABLE TALK The Difference Calvin Made 205 R. BRUCE DOUGLASS CRITIC’S CORNER Thinking beyond Easy Tribalism 216 WALTER BRUEGGEMANN BOOK REVIEWS The Ten Commandments, by Patrick Miller 220 STANLEY HAUERWAS An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts, by D. C. Parker 224 SHANE BERG TT-67-2-pages.indb 1 4/21/10 12:45 PM Incarnation: The Person and Life of Christ by Thomas F. Torrance, edited by Robert T. Walker 225 PAUL D. MOLNAR Religion after Postmodernism: Retheorizing Myth and Literature by Victor E. Taylor 231 TOM BEAUDOIN Practical Theology: An Introduction, by Richard R. Osmer 234 JOYCE ANN MERCER Boundless Faith: The Global Outreach of American Churches by Robert Wuthnow 241 RICHARD FOX YOUNG The Hand and the Road: The Life and Times of John A. Mackay by John Mackay Metzger 244 JOHN H. SINCLAIR The Child in the Bible, Marcia J. Bunge, general editor; Terence E. Fretheim and Beverly Roberts Gaventa, coeditors 248 KAREN-MARIE YUST TT-67-2-pages.indb 2 4/21/10 12:45 PM James F. Kay, Editor Gordon S. Mikoski, Reviews Editor Blair D. Bertrand, Editorial Assistant EDITORIAL COUNCIL Iain R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Synoptic Question
    411 A SURVEY OF THE SYNOPTIC QUESTION. V. NEW HYPOTHESES (contin?ted). WE have as yet done little more than cross the threshold of the treasure-house into which we are conducted by Dr. Resch. Something has been said very inadequately of his attempt, which runs parallel to Prof. Marshall's, to get back to an Aramaic original lying behind the various Greek versions of evangelical sayings current in the early cen­ turies. This however, though of course an important feature in his book, is hardly that which is most distinctive about it. Mr. Marshall operates chiefly with the canonical text; it is characteristic of Dr. Resch that he takes a wider range. His present work, it must be remembered, is only an instalment. It is to be followed by another, deal­ ing in like manner with extra-canonical sayings.1 When the two books are complete, they will form an enormous repertory of sayings rightly or wrongly attributed to Christ. It is not surprising that these researches should have occupied, as we are told, five and twenty years. We are reminded in some measure of the thirty years spent by the Cambridge editors over the monumental work which appeared about the same time as the Revised Version of the New Testament. Dr. Resch too has a most substantial result to show for his labours. They bear the marks of prolonged study, as well as of diligence in collecting. The work which he now offers to the world, although it has evidently grown under his hand, is thoroughly digested work.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happens When I Die?
    PROJECT CONNECT PROJECT CONNECT PROJECT CONNECT What Happens When I Die? by Rev. Stephen Hower Can anyone know for certain what happens at the moment of death? What do you believe about death and the afterlife? Why do you believe what you believe? Is one opinion just as good as another? I’ve conducted hundreds of funerals for families of every background and belief. Prior to the funeral, I typically gather the immediate family together for comfort, to share their memories, and to plan the memorial. Almost always there are differences of opinion about what should or should not be said, sung, or allowed during the service. The disagreements never really surprise me. Our families are just a reflection of the diversity of beliefs we have in America on the subject of death. Some hold Christian beliefs rooted in the Scripture and many do not. Still others believe it’s useless to speculate about things no one can know for sure. I have also stood by the bedside of terminally ill patients, sometimes at the moment of death. It is not unusual for patients and their families in those situations to ask lots of questions about the inevitable. “What’s going to happen, you know … when I die? What’s that going to be like? What can I expect to feel, see, or hear? Will I see angels? Will Jesus suddenly appear and personally take me to heaven? What will heaven be like? How can I be sure I will go to heaven? Will I be greeted by members of my family that have already died? Will I know others in heaven? Will others know me?” These are some of the questions I hear.
    [Show full text]