Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and the Pseudo-Dormition of the Holy Virgin*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and the Pseudo-Dormition of the Holy Virgin* PSEUDO-DIONYSIUS THE AREOPAGITE AND THE PSEUDO-DORMITION OF THE HOLY VIRGIN* Introduction The present article is the third piece among four in a series of studies examining the Christology of the Pseudo-Dionysian Corpus and showing that the Corpus conceals a radical dyophysite interpretation of the Chal- cedonian dogma, close to that of Theodoret of Cyrrhus. The first study in this series examines the direct and indirect text traditions of the Fourth, eminently Christological, Letter of Pseudo-Dionysius, in order to restore its original text and some of its variations throughout the ages and to better understand the Letter’s meaning, which was revealed to contain a particular Platonist/Evagrian interpretation of dyophysite Christology1. The second study examines the different strategies the chief Antiochian theologians adopted in the wake of the anti-Nestorian edict of Theodo- sius I, issued in August 4352, and shows that, as a result of the rude repression inflicted by the edict upon Antiochian theology, some of its representatives, headed by Theodoret of Cyrrhus, chose to adopt a kind of doublespeak, using the official Cyrillian formulations but maintaining * It would be very difficult to express my gratitude to all those who have contributed to this study. My feeling is that I could never have completed it elsewhere than in Jerusa- lem, in the inspiring and fascinating atmosphere of the Institute for Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University, where I had the privilege, in 2009/10, to be a member of a research group entitled ‘Personal versus Established Religion: Eastern Christian Thought and Practice from the Fifth to the Eighth Century’. Discussions with members of our research group, Brouria Ashkelony, Joëlle Beaucamp, Lorenzo Perrone, Roger Scott, Aryeh Kofsky, Hillel Newman, Oded Irshai, Derek Krueger, but also with members of the parallel Ancient Arabia research group, particularly Joseph Patrich, are lurking behind every meaningful thought of this study. This study owes enormously much to many years of communication with the late David B. Evans, Patrick Gray, Basile Markesinis, Paul Rorem, Ben Schomakers and Carlos Steel. I most warmly thank Father Justin, the librar- ian of the Monastery of Saint Catherine on Mount Sinai for providing me with a high- resolution digital copy of MS Sin. syr. 52, used in this study, where the entire text can be read without any difficulty, as well as Sebastian Brock, who has checked the edition and translation of the Syriac text of the Pseudo-Dionysian Pseudo-Dormition and suggested necessary corrections and emendations. Finally, my warmest gratitude is due to Roger Scott, who not only corrected the English of this study but also made a number of most valuable suggestions for its structure. 1 I. PERCZEL, The Christology of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite: The Fourth Letter in its Indirect and Direct Text Traditions, in Le Muséon, 117 (2004), p. 409-446 (= PERCZEL, The Christology of Pseudo-Dionysius). 2 Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. II, ed. by P. KRÜGER, Berlin, 1954 (11th ed.), I. 5. 6, p. 51. Le Muséon 125 (1-2), 55-97. doi: 10.2143/MUS.125.1.2162440 - Tous droits réservés. © Le Muséon, 2012. 995317_Mus2012_1-2_03_Perczel.indd5317_Mus2012_1-2_03_Perczel.indd 5555 99/07/12/07/12 008:258:25 56 I. PERCZEL their original theological convictions, which coincided with those of Nestorius. The situation outlined in that study provides the necessary historical background for the phenomena observed in the essay at hand3. The present study conducts its investigation into Pseudo-Dionysius’s conception of the Virgin Mary and shows that she plays a negligible role in Pseudo-Dionysian theology, given that the passage that both Church tradition and modern scholarship usually interprets as the ‘Dormition of the Mother of God’ speaks in fact about something else – in my interpre- tation about the Council of Chalcedon. Finally, the fourth study will pre- sent a source analysis of some of the main Christological texts of the Dionysian Corpus, namely Divine Names II. 10 and the Third and Fourth Letters, and will show that these texts have been composed upon the model of and by using texts of Theodoret and Nestorius. All this research seems to indicate that we should look for the identity of Pseudo-Diony- sius in the circles of Theodoret of Cyrrhus. 1. Some general considerations on the Dionysian Corpus The Dionysian Corpus is normally dated between a terminus post quem constituted by a ‘triple time barrier’4 and a terminus ante quem. According to the received wisdom the terminus post quem is defined by 1) the introduction of the Nicaea-Constantinopolitan Creed to the Syrian-Antiochian liturgy by Peter the Fuller, Anti-Chalcedonian Patri- arch of Antioch, in 4765; 2) the promulgation of the Henoticon edict of emperor Zeno in 4826; 3) the death of Proclus in 4857; so the Corpus 3 This study is now available in electronic format, as a multilayered e-book with much explanatory material at AthanorBooks (www.giottoslibrary.com). 4 This ‘triple time barrier’ was suggested by J. STIGLMAYR, Das Aufkommen der Pseudo-Dionysischen Schriften und ihr Eindringen in die christliche Literatur bis zum Lateranconcil 649. Ein zweiter Beitrag zur Dionysiusfrage (Jahresbericht des öffentlichen Privatgymnasiums an der Stella Matutina zu Feldkirch, 4/5), Feldkirch, 1894 (= STIGL- MAYR, Das Aufkommen der Pseudo-Dionysischen Schriften). The same idea was recently invoked by B.R. SUCHLA, Dionysius Areopagita: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, Freiburg – Basel – Wien, 2008, p. 21 (= SUCHLA, Dionysius Areopagita: Leben – Werk – Wirkung). Suchla does not take into consideration the criticism of the triple time barrier by P. ROREM – J.C. LAMOREAUX, John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus: Annotating the Areopagite, Oxford, 1998, p. 9-10 (= ROREM – LAMOREAUX, John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus). 5 STIGLMAYR, Das Aufkommen der Pseudo-Dionysischen Schriften, p. 34-39. 6 Ibidem, p. 39-45. 7 Pseudo-Dionysius’s dependence on Proclus was first methodologically established by Joseph Stiglmayr and Hugo Koch, independently, in 1895: J. STIGLMAYR, Der neupla- toniker Proclus als Vorlage des sogenannten Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Übel, in Historisches Jahrbuch, 16 (1895), p. 253-273, 721-748; H. KOCH, Proklus als 995317_Mus2012_1-2_03_Perczel.indd5317_Mus2012_1-2_03_Perczel.indd 5566 99/07/12/07/12 008:258:25 PSEUDO-DIONYSIUS AND THE PSEUDO-DORMITION 57 should have been written after 485. This speculation is based on the fol- lowing assumptions: 1) in the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy Pseudo-Diony- sius mentions a ‘universal hymnody’ sung during the liturgy8, which scholars tend to identify with the Creed, believed to have been first intro- duced into the liturgy by Peter the Fuller, while the sacrament of the Holy Myron treated in chapter VII of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy is also considered as an innovation introduced by Peter; 2) allegedly, the Dio- nysian Corpus displays an ‘eirenic’ attitude, a middle way between Chal- cedonians and Anti-Chalcedonians, corresponding to the spirit of the Henoticon that had forbidden debates concerning Chalcedon; 3) almost the entire work of Proclus seems to be known to Pseudo-Dionysius; so it is supposed that he was writing after the philosopher’s death. The ter- minus ante quem is defined by the first mention of the Corpus in the works of Severus of Antioch, datable to the 510s or the 520s. Some scholars consider a Constantinopolitan Colloquium between Chalcedoni- ans and Miaphysites in 532 to be the terminus ante quem, when Severus’ followers were referring to Pseudo-Dionysius’ Fourth Letter and Hypa- tius of Edessa expressed his doubts concerning the authenticity of the Corpus9. Quelle des Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Bösen, in Philologus, 54 (1895), p. 438-444; IDEM, Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita in seinen Beziehungen zum Neu- platonismus und Mysterienwesen, Mainz, 1900. However, at least Pseudo-Dionysius’s dependence on the Neoplatonist school was already suggested by J.G.V. ENGELHARDT, Die angeblichen Schriften des Areopagiten Dionysius übersetzt und mit Abhandlungen begleitet, Sulzbach, 1823, p. xi-xii (= ENGELHARDT, Die angeblichen Schriften des Areo- pagiten Dionysius). Engelhardt has not treated the Proclean elements in Pseudo-Dionysius. 8 EH III.7, 436C, p. 87, l. 24-88, l. 1 [Heil]. 9 Hypatius’ criticism is reported in a letter by the Chalcedonian Innocentius of Maro- nia (ACO IV/2 [ed. E. SCHWARTZ], p. 169-184, here p. 173, l. 12-18). Hypatius was reply- ing to a letter sent by the miaphysite bishops to Justinian, where a Dionysian locus (DN I.4, 592 AB, p. 113, l. 6-12 [Suchla]) was also cited as Patristic witness to the mia- physite doctrine. The letter’s text is translated into Syriac in Pseudo-Zachariah of Mytilene’s Chronicle. The Syriac text of the citation can be found in J.P.N. LAND, Anecdota Syriaca, vol. III, Leiden, 1870, p. 276, l. 5-18, its English translation in The Syriac Chronicle Known as that of Zachariah of Mitylene, trans. F.J. HAMILTON and E.W. BROOKS, London, 1899, p. 250. According to the argument of Rosemary A. Arthur, the fact that most early sixth-century miaphysite authors do not refer to the Pseudo- Dionysian Corpus indicates a very late appearance of the latter. She gives as terminus post quem (!) the year 527. She is inclined to suppose that the references found in Severus’s works may be later interpolations. See R.A. ARTHUR, Pseudo-Dionysius as Polemicist: The Development and Purpose of the Angelic Hierarchy in Sixth Century Syria, Alder- shot, 2008, p. 105 ff. (= ARTHUR, Pseudo-Dionysius as Polemicist). However, this assump- tion seems to be gratuitous. A firm terminus ante quem is furnished by the fact that Severus’ works, including the three that contain references to the Dionysian Corpus, were translated into Syriac in the year 528 AD. See ROREM – LAMOREAUX, John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus, p.
Recommended publications
  • Angels in the Christian Tradition
    Christian Angelology Angels in the Christian Tradition Apostolic Fathers to Early Church (70 – 150AD Epistle of Barnabas (c.75 - 135) Barnabas’ comments on angels are in relation to an evil angel who deceived Israel, (9:4) and reflect the Apostolic Fathers' general mild-dualism worldview between light and darkness. (18:1) 1 Clement (c.95) Angels are mentioned a few times in his argument for Church order. He cites the holy angels for an example of obedience to God’s order, (34:5) while pointing out that some angels chose differently and were condemned. (39:4) One interesting note is his quotation of Deuteronomy 32:8 where he, not surprisingly, follows the LXX reading of “number of the angels”. (29:2) Fragments of Papias (c.100 - 125) Only in one small fragment do we have anything of Papias on angels. The quotation directly relates to the idea of an original angelic rulership of God’s creation. Papias thus speaks, word for word: To some of them [angels] He gave dominion over the arrangement of the world, and He commissioned them to exercise their dominion well. And he says, immediately after this: but it happened that their arrangement came to nothing. (7:1) Letters of Ignatius (c.110) Refers to them as both “angels” and “rulers”. ( Smyrnaeans 6:1) He also holds that there are places and hierarchies of them, but does not elaborate. ( Trallians 5:2) Ignatius states that he knows very little about these due to him still being a learner. Whether this means others may know, or that no one truly knows, is a bit unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Masarykova Univerzita Filozofická Fakulta Magisterská Diplomová Práce
    Masarykova Univerzita Filozofická fakulta Ústav klasických studií Mediteránní studia Magisterská diplomová práce 2018 Bc. Zuzana Mitrengová 1 Masarykova Univerzita Filozofická fakulta Ústav klasických studií Mediteránní studia Bc. Zuzana Mitrengová Osudy antické filozofie po uzavření platónské Akademie na Východě Magisterská diplomová práce Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Katarina Petrovićová, Ph.D. 2018 2 Prohlašuji, že jsem uvedenou diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně s využitím uvedených pramenů a literatury. ................................... 3 Poděkování Ráda bych poděkovala vedoucí mé práce, doc. Mgr. Katarině Petrovićové, Ph.D., za její trpělivost, cenné rady a podnětné vedení. 4 1 Obsah 1 OBSAH .................................................................................................................................... 5 2 ÚVOD ...................................................................................................................................... 6 3 BYZANC A KLASICKÁ VZDĚLANOST V 4. – 9. STOLETÍ ................................................................ 7 3.1 NOVOPLATÓNISMUS A JEHO PŘEDSTAVITELÉ .................................................................................. 13 3.2 CENTRA NOVOPLATÓNSKÉ FILOZOFIE ............................................................................................ 19 3.2.1 Atény ................................................................................................................................ 19 3.2.2 Alexandrie .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias' on the Principles of The
    ALEXANDER OF APHRODISIAS’ ON THE PRINCIPLES OF THE UNIVERSE IN A SYRIAC ADAPTATION Every kindly thing that is / Hath a kindly stede ther he May best in hit conserved be; / Unto which place every thing Through his kindly enclyning / Moveth for to come to. CHAUCER, Hous of Fame The seventh century Syriac manuscript BL Add.14658 is a wide-rang- ing collection of texts of mostly non-Christian origin1. Some are transla- tions from Greek, others native Syriac compositions. A number of these have received scholarly treatment in the century and a half since the vel- lum codex was brought, with many others, from the Monastery of the Syrians in the Egyptian delta to the British Museum2. It is, for example, the only extant witness to the Book of the Laws of the Countries, tradi- tionally ascribed to the second century ‘heresiarch’ Bardaisan, and to the Apology ascribed to Melito of Sardis. Many of the texts found in the volume are in some way or other con- nected with the sixth century Syrian polymath Sergius of Res‘aina3. The first, and most extensive, piece in the collection is Sergius’ On the Aim of the Works of Aristotle, which turns out to be a commentary on the Categories, written in the tradition of fifth/sixth century Alexandrian Neoplatonism, transposed into a Syriac milieu4. Other works connected 1 W. WRIGHT, Catalogue of Syriac manuscripts in the British Museum acquired since the year 1838. 3 vols. London, 1870-2, p. 1154-60. 2 After being excitedly reported in 1852 by E. RENAN, Lettre à M.
    [Show full text]
  • Granby Mother Kills Her 2 Small Children
    r"T ' ' j •'.v> ■ I SATUBDAY, DECEMBER 24, 1960 V‘‘‘ iOanrtifBter E w ttins $?raUt Ifii'J •• t Not (me of the men MW anything funny In the process. No Herald Social Worker About To>m Heard Along Main Street! Just like a woman 7 Some of the men fall in the know-how Pepart- OnMdhday Sought by Town WATBS wlU meet And on Some o) Manehe$ter*§ Side SlreeU,Too ment, too, when it. comes to freeing l^iesdey evening nt the Italian mechanical horses from Ice traps. The town is accepting appUca- The Manchester Evening tiona through Wednesday to fill Amertean ' Chib on Sldrltlge St. <^been a. luncheon guest at the inn. 1 0 :' Welgbtog In win be from 7 to 8 What Are You Gonna Do? It ' So Reverse It a social work^ post with sn an­ One Herald aubacriber is very Lt. Leander, who is stationed at Herald will-not publish Mon­ 'Words of advice wer^ voiced nual salary range of 84,004 to YOL. LXXX, NO. 7S (SIXTEEN PAGES) MANCHESTER, CONN„ TUESDAY. DECEMBER 27, 1960 (ChuwUtsg AgvsrttalBg m Fag» 14) PRICE PIVB V-*A red-faced becauee her 10-year-oM the U.S. Navy atatipn .gt Orange, irom one local youngster to an­ day, the day after Christmas, 14,914 and an allowance for use son got carried away with the Tex., had spent the afterhiibh vla- other as they walked along the Merty Christmas to all. of the worker's own car. Handd S. Crozler will show Christmas spirit. Iting a state park, San Jacinto street in the ijear zero weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Destinées De L'illyricum Méridional Pendant Le Haut Moyen Âge
    JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 12 OUTPUT: Thu May 26 16:08:52 2011 SUM: 6023F8EF /v2451/blackwell/journals/emed_v19_i3/05emed_324 1 Book reviewsemed_324 354..376 2 3 Les destinées de l’Illyricum méridional pendant le haut Moyen Âge. 4 Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome, Moyen Âge 120–2. Rome: 5 l’École Française de Rome. 2009. 238 pp. + 50 b/w and 101 color figures. 6 EUR 55. ISBN 978 2 7283 0870 5; ISSN 0223 9883. 7 8 This is the proceedings of a conference jointly organized by École 9 française de Rome, Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance, and 10 the Albanian Institute of Archaeology in Lezha (Albania) in 2008.In 11 the introduction, Etleva Nallbani explains its main objective as throw- 12 ing new light on developments in the Western Balkans during the early 13 Middle Ages, primarily on the basis of archaeological research con- 14 ducted in the past two decades. The present volume witnesses not only 15 the technological advances in archaeology, which can be seen at work in 16 a number of contributions, but it also bears the mark of a renewed 17 interest in rural settlements and the relative departure from political 18 history in favour of detailed analyses of production, distribution, and 19 exchange routes. 20 Rather than summarize the wealth of insights in a short space, I will 21 focus on two major themes addressed by this volume: urban and rural life 22 in Illyricum and patterns of production and distribution. Pascale Cheva- 23 lier and Jagoda Mardešic´ contribute an insightful piece on urban life at 24 Salona during the sixth–seventh centuries based on the recent excavations 25 conducted in the episcopal complex of the town.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity
    The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilkinson, Ryan Hayes. 2015. The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467211 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity A dissertation presented by Ryan Hayes Wilkinson to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Ryan Hayes Wilkinson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Michael McCormick Ryan Hayes Wilkinson The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity Abstract In the fifth and sixth centuries CE, the Roman Empire fragmented, along with its network of political, cultural, and socio-economic connections. How did that network’s collapse reshape the social and mental horizons of communities in one part of the Roman world, now eastern France? Did new political frontiers between barbarian kingdoms redirect those communities’ external connections, and if so, how? To address these questions, this dissertation focuses on the cities of two Gallo-Roman tribal groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibial Nail ADVANCED Semi-Extended Parapatellar Approach
    Tibial Nail ADVANCED Semi-Extended Parapatellar Approach Instruments and implants approved by the AO Foundation. Image intensifier control This description alone does not provide sufficient background for direct use of DePuy Synthes products. Instruction by a surgeon experienced in handling these products is highly recommended. Processing, Reprocessing, Care and Maintenance For general guidelines, function control and dismantling of multi-part instruments, as well as processing guidelines for implants, please contact your local sales representative or refer to: http://emea.depuysynthes.com/hcp/reprocessing-care-maintenance For general information about reprocessing, care and maintenance of Synthes reusable devices, instrument trays and cases, as well as processing of Synthes non-sterile implants, please consult the Important Information leaflet (SE_023827) or refer to: http://emea.depuysynthes.com/hcp/reprocessing-care-maintenance Table of Contents Introduction AO Principles 2 Indications 3 Surgical Technique Opening the Tibia 4 Nail Insertion 13 Distal Locking 28 Proximal Locking 35 End Cap Insertion 48 Implant Removal 49 Product Information Implants 54 Alternative Instruments 56 Instruments 58 Optional Instruments 64 Semi-extended Parapatellar Approach Surgical Technique DePuy Synthes 1 AO Principles AO PRINCIPLES In 1958, the AO formulated four basic principles, which haveIn 1958, become the AO the formulated guidelines forfour internal basic principles, fixation1,2 .which have become the guidelines for internal fixation1, 2. 4_Priciples_03.pdf 1 05.07.12 12:08 FunctionalAnatomic reduction reduction Stable fixation FractureFracture reductionreduction andand fifixationxation to Fracture fixation providing absoluteabso- to restore restore anatomical anatomical relationships. relationships. orlute relative or relative stability, stability, as required as by therequired patient, by thethe patient,injury, and the the injury, per - 1 2 sonalityand the ofpersonality the fracture.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Foods © 2007 Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology
    Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology Application of Biotechnology for Functional Foods © 2007 Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. All rights reserved. No portion of this paper may be reproduced by any means, electronic or mechanical, without permission in writing from the publisher. This report was supported by a grant from The Pew Charitable Trusts to the University of Richmond. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Pew Charitable Trusts or the University of Richmond. Contents Preface ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 3 Part 1: Applications of Biotechnology for Functional Foods ..................................................................7 Part 2: Legal and Regulatory Considerations Under Federal Law .....................................................37 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................63 Selected References ..............................................................................................................................................65 Preface ince the earliest days of agricultural biotechnology development, scientists have envisioned harnessing the power of genetic engineering to enhance nutritional and other properties of foods for consumer benefit. The first
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Conflict in the Fifth Century: Rome and the Wider Church
    _full_journalsubtitle: Journal of Patrology and Critical Hagiography _full_abbrevjournaltitle: SCRI _full_ppubnumber: ISSN 1817-7530 (print version) _full_epubnumber: ISSN 1817-7565 (online version) _full_issue: 1 _full_issuetitle: 0 _full_alt_author_running_head (change var. to _alt_author_rh): 0 _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (change var. to _alt_arttitle_rh): Addressing Conflict in the Fifth Century _full_alt_articletitle_toc: 0 _full_is_advance_article: 0 92 Scrinium 14 (2018) 92-114 Neil www.brill.com/scri Addressing Conflict in the Fifth Century: Rome and the Wider Church Bronwen Neil Macquarie University and University of South Africa [email protected] Abstract In seeking to trace the escalation, avoidance or resolution of conflicts, contemporary social conflict theorists look for incompatible goals, differentials in power, access to social resources, the exercise of control, the expression of dissent, and the strategies employed in responding to disagreements. It is argued here that these concepts are just as applicable to the analysis of historical doctrinal conflicts in Late Antiquity as they are to understanding modern conflicts. In the following, I apply social conflict theory to three conflicts involving the late antique papacy to see what new insights it can proffer. The first is Zosimus's involvement in the dispute over the hierarchy of Gallic bishops at the beginning of the fifth century. The second and longest case-study is Leo I's interven- tion in the Chalcedonian conflict over the natures of Christ. The final brief study is the disputed election of Symmachus at the end of the fifth century. Keywords Christology – Council of Chalcedon – Late antique papacy – Leo I, pope – papal letters – social conflict theory – Symmachus, pope – Zosimus, pope The term “conflict” is usually read as a negative, especially when used in the same phrase as “religious”.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Hymnography and the Quest for Orthodox Unity: Notes on the Liturgical Commemoration of the Council of Chalcedon, Towar
    Byzantine Hymnography and the Quest for Orthodox Unity: Notes on the Liturgical Commemoration of the Council of Chalcedon, Towards the Reconciliation of “Eastern” and “Oriental” Churches Gregory Tucker* Among the issues remaining to be addressed along the path to reconciliation between the “Eastern” and “Oriental” Orthodox is the characterisation of Oriental teachers as heretics in the liturgical texts of the Byzantine Rite. The mere suggestion of liturgical revision to reflect the agreement that multiple theological vocabularies are legitimate and therefore theologians associated with them should not be anathematized or deprecated has been met with fierce opposition from some Eastern Orthodox. This paper considers what might actually be involved in such a revision, taking as an example the texts for the commemoration of the Council of Chalcedon. It suggests that the extent of necessary revision would be far less than is perhaps feared. Keywords: Chalcedon, liturgy, liturgical revision, Byzantine Rite, Eastern Or- thodox, Oriental Orthodox Introduction From an Orthodox perspective, one of the great fruits of modern ecumen- ism1 has been the inauguration of a new phase in the relationship between the “Eastern” and “Oriental” Orthodox churches.2 An unofficial bilateral dialogue began in 1964, which became an official dialogue in 1985. Initial conversations correctly prioritised discussion of contested points in Chris- tology (disagreement over which contributed significantly to and, to a large * Gregory Tucker, Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93503 Regensburg, Germa- ny, [email protected] 1 This paper will not address opposition on principle to ecumenical dialogue (including dialogue between separated Orthodox groups) which is a common–indeed, characteristic– feature of some traditions within contemporary Eastern Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Preaching Christ in a Pagan Culture (Part 4) Acts 17
    Series: Code Red: The Coming Storm Message 9 - Preaching Christ in a Pagan Culture (Part 4) Acts 17: 15-34 INTRODUCTION: We are gleaning principles that will guide us through the storm giving us a strategy for living in a culture that is antagonistic and hostile to Christianity. We are “watching” Paul as he models the behavior of a believer in a non- Christian environment. Acts 17: 15-34 ESV 15 Those who conducted Paul brought him as far as Athens, and after receiving a command for Silas and Timothy to come to him as soon as possible, they departed. 16 Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols. 17 So he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the marketplace every day with those who happened to be there. 18 Some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also conversed with him. And some said, “What does this babbler wish to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a preacher of foreign divinities”—because he was preaching Jesus and the resurrection. 19 And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? 20 For you bring some strange things to our ears. We wish to know therefore what these things mean.” 21 Now all the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there would spend their time in nothing except telling or hearing something new.
    [Show full text]
  • Syriac and Arabic Transmission of on the Cosmos Hidemi Takahashi
    Syriac and Arabic Transmission of On the Cosmos Hidemi Takahashi 1. Introduction On the Cosmos is one of a group of non-Christian Greek texts that were translated at a relatively early date (in the sixth century) into Syriac and, it might be remembered, also into Armenian, a fact which no doubt re- flects the popularity of the work, at least in certain circles, in Late Antiq- uity. The work was then translated into Arabic mainly, it seems, from Syriac, and probably, again, at a relatively early date. While the Syriac version is known to us only through a single manuscript, there are several manuscripts representing at least three different Arabic versions of On the Cosmos. The account that follows here attempts to provide a summary of what is known about these Syriac and Arabic versions of On the Cosmos, to- gether with some indications of the research that waits to be done on these versions. 2. Syriac Version of On the Cosmos The Syriac version of On the Cosmos is preserved in MS. British Library, Additional 14658 (fol. 107v–122r), a manuscript that has been dated to the seventh century, some five centuries before the oldest Greek witness of the work.1 This Syriac version, one of the texts that were taken note of by Ernest Renan some years after its arrival at the British Museum in 1843,2 was published by Paul de Lagarde in his Analecta syriaca in 1858.3 A detailed study of the Syriac text, mainly of the first four chapters and including an annotated translation of Chapter 4, was then made by Vic- tor Ryssel.4 Further notes and suggested emendations were provided by 1 W.
    [Show full text]