DOCSLIB.ORG

Alyssa Kariofyllis, M.A., 2016 Scholar in the Park Minute Man National Historic Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alyssa Kariofyllis, M.A., 2016 Scholar in the Park Minute Man National Historic Park Alyssa Kariofyllis, M.A., 2016 Scholar in the Park Minute Man National Historic Park Did the roles and responsibilities assumed by women in Concord, Lincoln, and Lexington during the Revolution alter their status after the War? Women’s actions during the Revolution did indeed result in changes to their status and responsibilities in the early years of the republic. In the decades following the war, women’s lives looked drastically different from those that came before. Women were educated in increasing numbers. They were more involved in politics. Motherhood was more respected. And many women continued to purchase goods rather than produce them, a trend that began before the Revolution. While these changes may initially appear large, many of them took place within the privacy of the household. Because these shifts were primarily in the private sphere, the public perception and legal status of women did not change drastically. 1 Many historians have examined the ways that women’s lives were altered during the post-war years. Linda Kerber’s Women of the Republic argued that changes that came about after the Revolution resulted in the distribution of opportunities to women through the cultivation of the concept of the Republican Mother.⁠2 A virtuous, well-educated woman who reared her children, especially her sons, to be patriotic citizens was indispensable to the new republic. Her role was so important, according to Kerber, that the public considered her the fourth branch of government.⁠3 Women’s roles were politically significant under the new Republican government. Women’s new status in the family granted them access to limited disbursements of public privileges, including access to education, limited representation in courts, and the ability to create a politicized community of women. Kerber also suggested that the Revolution irrevocably changed the public’s perceptions of marriage. Egalitarian partnerships were to act as another payment for women’s help with the war effort. These rewards, however, did not go so far as to recognize women’s independence from their husbands. Kerber demonstrated that the Republic’s founders chose to forego the independence of women and instead favored continuing coverture’s hold on married women. This decision resulted in legal and ideological conflicts that remained unresolved for generations. Kerber argued not that the Revolution brought unlimited opportunities to women, but that it gave them agency as mothers. Mothers were to raise the next generation of virtuous Republican men. The Revolution politicized women’s roles, decisions and actions as mothers at the same time as elite men restricted women’s importance to their role as mothers within the confines of the home. Men regarded women, then, in Kerber’s view, not as individuals or citizens, but as the maternal engine behind the Republic.4 Jan Lewis’s article “The Republican Wife” added to Kerber’s work by suggesting that women of 1 Mary Beth Norton discusses these shifts more generally in her book: Mary Beth Norton, Liberty’s Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American Women, 1750-1800 (Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1980). 2 Linda Kerber. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America (New York: Norton, 1980). 3 Kerber, 200. 4 This is largely an overview of Kerber's argument. For more, see Kerber, Women of the Republic, Introduction and Chapter 9. 1 the early Republic also had social significance as wives.⁠5 She examined commentary about women’s roles in contemporary novels and magazine articles, arguing that women’s importance within the domestic realm was focused less on the family than on a properly maintained marriage. Lewis argued that harmonious marriages were the “very pattern from which the cloth of republican society was to be cut.”⁠6 If a man married a virtuous woman, she would in turn make him a better man, which would lead to the cultivation of a better, stronger republic.⁠7 Thus, Lewis showed that increasing support for egalitarian and loving marriages created a resolve to push the republic forward, as public good came about through private virtue. Lewis asserted that republican theorists who advocated these new marriage ideals did not intend to change the entire patriarchal system. They created the ideal of the affectionate marriage to ensure the safety of patriarchy rather than to give wives more public rights and privileges. Their interest in maintaining harmony prompted them to retain the structures of coverture, despite the anti-patriarchal sentiments of the Revolution. This interest also made popular opinion shift to support a woman’s deference to her husband. Yet, women remained crucial to the cultivation of a morally upright nation. The smart, quiet, obedient wife would be the driving force behind the husband working to be the most moral version of himself. Thus, as Lewis wrote, “harmony took precedence over equality.”⁠8 This focus on the family would have also been important in Concord, Lincoln, and Lexington. Historians have established, however, that the towns’ population grew little after the war. Young people married later and the average number of children in each family decreased.9 Even after marriage, couples began to plan their families by deliberately limiting the number of children they had and spacing out births. As historian Brian Donahue suggested, “What had begun as a build in yeomanly (and goodwifely) constraint on marrying was transformed into deliberate self control within marriage.”10 Furthermore, many young families left the town because of a shortage of land. Bob Gross suggests that Concord was in decline beginning in 1775 because of a stagnant economy, worn out land, and the loss of the town's younger population.11 Since the younger population moved to the frontier, there were fewer growing families in Concord during and after the war. Some contemporaries suggested the shift to marry later in age was a direct result of the war itself. An essay published in the Massachusetts Gazette addressed “the Maids” who were now 5 Jan Lewis, “The Republican Wife: Virtue and Seduction in the Early Republic,” The William and Mary Quarterly 44, no. 4 (October 1, 1987): 689–721. 6 Lewis, 689. 7 Lewis, 709. 8 Lewis, 712. For more on women during the age of revolutions, see Sarah Knott, “Female Liberty?” in The William and Mary Quarterly (July 2014), Rosemarie Zaggari, “Morals, Manners and the Republican Mother” in American Quarterly (June 1992), and Pauline Schloesser, The Fair Sex (2002). 9 Brian Donahue, The Great Meadow: Farmers and the Land in Colonial Concord (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007), 225. Donahue suggests that women’s marrying age rose from twenty to twenty three between 1750 and 1790. He also states that the average number of children fell from seven to five per family. 10 Ibid. 11 Robert A. Gross, The Minutemen and their World (New York: HIll and Wang, 1976), 189. 2 eight years older and still unmarried.12 The author, who signed as “A Bachelor,” aimed to discuss legislature about the regulation of marriage. The law would reward those persons who married at young ages by giving them small sums of cash. The men who chose to remain bachelors would be fined yearly. The resulting sum would then be donated for the “relief of Orphan Maids.”13 The author hoped that taxing bachelorship would “remove this political and social evil, celibacy” while also encouraging men to “perform his duty to himself and to society” by marrying. He suggested that men of the marrying age should keep in mind that the war suspended women’s ability to marry and praised the “respectable body of Ladies” who had lived through the recent wars. In future courtships, the bachelor argued that “no estimate should be made of the eight years war, among persons who were marriageable on the 19th of April 1774.14 It seems a real hardship, my friends, that you should lose so much time and sacrifice several years of the prime of life to the cruelty of a foreign nation. When therefore your parents or a lover recurs to the bible leaf to find your ages, it is expected that eight years and an half will be deducted, and the remainder accounted your true ages.”15 This passage suggests that early republican single women should neither be punished for being unmarried nor overlooked because they were older than many of the other women arriving at the marriageable age. Historians suggest shifts in the marrying age and number of children in each family are partially a result of changes in consumerism and household production. Families needed fewer children to run an efficient and productive household. Agricultural capitalism meant that Concord, Lexington, and Lincoln residents increasingly sourced their goods from more distant places.16 Historian Ellen Hartigan-O’Connor argues that women combined their own labor, credit at local shops, and cash to mobilize their spending power in the marketplace, making them just as responsible for the spread of commercial goods as merchants advertising goods in newspapers.17 Hartigan-O’Connor also suggests that women shoppers in the early nineteenth century began to compare prices and shop for bargains, creating female shopping networks that aimed to address uncertainties of supply and quality in new capitalist marketplaces.18 These transactions relied especially on purchasing power through credit or financial networks or the ownership of enslaved persons. Most households no longer relied on the labor of a family’s children to produce the necessary goods. This, however, differed depending on the wealth of each household and their access to the marketplace. In her analysis of early republican women’s relationship to the new American state, Rosemarie Zagarri examines the various ways women’s political opportunities and participation changed 12 “Address to the Maids” Massachusetts Gazette, December 30, 1783, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling
    Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling James Carpenter (Binghamton University) Abstract I challenge the traditional argument that Jefferson’s educational plans for Virginia were built on mod- ern democratic understandings. While containing some democratic features, especially for the founding decades, Jefferson’s concern was narrowly political, designed to ensure the survival of the new republic. The significance of this piece is to add to the more accurate portrayal of Jefferson’s impact on American institutions. Submit your own response to this article Submit online at democracyeducationjournal.org/home Read responses to this article online http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/iss2/5 ew historical figures have undergone as much advocate of public education in the early United States” (p. 280). scrutiny in the last two decades as has Thomas Heslep (1969) has suggested that Jefferson provided “a general Jefferson. His relationship with Sally Hemings, his statement on education in republican, or democratic society” views on Native Americans, his expansionist ideology and his (p. 113), without distinguishing between the two. Others have opted suppressionF of individual liberties are just some of the areas of specifically to connect his ideas to being democratic. Williams Jefferson’s life and thinking that historians and others have reexam- (1967) argued that Jefferson’s impact on our schools is pronounced ined (Finkelman, 1995; Gordon- Reed, 1997; Kaplan, 1998). because “democracy and education are interdependent” and But his views on education have been unchallenged. While his therefore with “education being necessary to its [democracy’s] reputation as a founding father of the American republic has been success, a successful democracy must provide it” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart L. Udall Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 1/12/1970 Administrative Information
    Stewart L. Udall Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 1/12/1970 Administrative Information Creator: Stewart L. Udall Interviewer: W.W. Moss Date of Interview: January 12, 1970 Length: 28 pp. Biographical Note Udall was the Secretary of the Interior for the President Kennedy and President Johnson Administrations (1961-1969). This interview focuses on Udall’s political background, his first impressions of Senator John F. Kennedy, Labor Relations of 1958, and the 1960 presidential nomination, among other issues. Access Restrictions No restrictions. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed March 17, 1981, copyright of these materials have been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Neoliberalism: Endless War and Humanitarian Crisis in the Twenty-First Century Michael Schwartz Stony Brook State University
    Societies Without Borders Volume 6 | Issue 3 Article 3 2011 Military Neoliberalism: Endless War and Humanitarian Crisis in the Twenty-First Century Michael Schwartz Stony Brook State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Schwartz, Michael. 2011. "Military Neoliberalism: Endless War and Humanitarian Crisis in the Twenty-First Century." Societies Without Borders 6 (3): 190-303. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol6/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cross Disciplinary Publications at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Societies Without Borders by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Schwartz: Military Neoliberalism: Endless War and Humanitarian Crisis in th M. Schwartz/Societies Without Borders 6:3 (2011) 190-303 Military Neoliberalism: Endless War and Humanitarian Crisis in the Twenty-First Century Michael Schwartz Stony Brook State University Received January 2011; Accepted August 2011 ______________________________________________________ Abstract This article seeks to understand the dynamics of twenty-first century military intervention by the United States and its allies. Based on an analysis of Bush and Obama administration policy documents, we note that these wars are new departures from previous interventions, calling on the military to undertake post-conflict reconstruction in ways that was previously left to indigenous government or to the civilian aspects of the occupation. This military-primary reconstruction is harnessed to ambitious neoliberal economics aimed at transforming the host country’s political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underestimated Oregon Presidential Primary of 1960
    The Underestimated Oregon Presidential Primary of 1960 By Monroe Sweetland 0 PresidentJohn E Kennedy on a visit to Astoria, Oregon, in September 1963 This content downloaded from 71.34.78.7 on Mon, 25 May 2020 18:39:50 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Friday in Oregon that Made Kennedy President In 1964, Monroe Sweetland, Oregon journalist and legislator and one of thefirst Kennedy organizers in Oregon, wrote this piece about the significance of the 1960 Oregon Primary. Friday, May 20, 1960, was a judgment day which could bring impetus or disaster to the Kennedy-for-President campaign - the Democratic Primary in Oregon. The bandwagon had been rolling well. Each of the six contested primaries - six potential roadblocks - had been cleared. From the beginning in New Hampshire through the rugged battles with Senator Hubert Humphrey in Wisconsin and West Virginia, the Democratic voters had thawed and then warmed to John E Kennedy. Just as the Oregon Trail had been bordered long ago with the bleached bones of those who tried but didn't quite make it, Kennedy's campaign craftsmen knew that defeat in Oregon could be decisive. The growing image of Kennedy as "a winner" could be extinguished by a rebuff in Oregon as convention-time neared. Oregon was the last of the seven contested primaries. It was the only primary testing opinion in the Far West - that terra incognita, to the Bostonians, which lay beyond the Farm Belt. To the Kennedy forces Oregon did not look good, but it couldn't be avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals, Conservatives, and the War on Terror
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION THE GOOD FIGHT: LIBERALS, CONSERVATIVES, AND THE WAR ON TERROR Washington, D.C. Wednesday, June 7, 2006 2 Moderator: E. J. DIONNE, JR. Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution Panelists: PETER BEINART Nonresident Fellow The Brookings Institution Editor-at-Large, The New Republic TOD LINDBERG Research Fellow and Editor of Policy Review Hoover Institution * * * * * Anderson Court Reporting 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 3 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. DIONNE: I want to welcome everyone here today. I want to welcome back my dear colleague, Peter Beinart. We held this event for many reasons, one of which is we missed him so much and we wanted him back at Brookings. And also, my friend, Tod Lindberg. I want to begin by noting that, as a journalist, I always like to be on top of the news. So, this morning, by I suppose an act of the spirit, a review of this book popped into my email queue that Peter was not aware of. I actually think it is an important review because it says a lot about what Peter has accomplished in this book. It is by another Todd with somewhat different views than Tod Lindberg, Todd Gitlin who is a professor at Columbia University and was an opponent of the Iraq War that Peter endorsed. I just want to read the first paragraph because I think it will give an indication of why Peter’s book is so rich and so worthy of attention, discussion, and debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilbert A. Harrison Interviewer: Larry J
    Gilbert A. Harrison Oral History Interview – JFK#1, 10/06/1967 Administrative Information Creator: Gilbert A. Harrison Interviewer: Larry J. Hackman Date of Interview: October 6, 1967 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 18 pages Biographical Note Harrison was the owner and editor of the influential magazine The New Republic from 1953 to 1974. In this interview Harrison discusses his interactions with JFK beginning when JFK was a congressman; the American Veterans Committee’s interest in JFK; JFK’s personal interactions with journalists; The New Republic’s support for Adlai E. Stevenson over the years and then for JFK in 1960; Stevenson’s position within JFK’s Administration; an article about the Bay of Pigs that Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., asked Harrison to pull; and Harrison’s opinion of JFK as President, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed March 13, 1969, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Freedom in American History Eric Foner Dewitt Clinton
    The Idea of Freedom in American History Eric Foner DeWitt Clinton Professor of History Columbia University I wish to begin today with a single episode in the history of American freedom. On September 16, 1947, the 160th anniversary of the signing of the U. S. Constitution, the Freedom Train opened to the public in Philadelphia. A traveling exhibition of some 133 historical documents, the train, bedecked in red, white, and blue, soon embarked on a 16-month tour that took it to over 300 American cities. Never before or since have so many cherished pieces of Americana -- among them the Mayflower Compact, Declaration of Independence, and Gettysburg Address -- been assembled in one place. After leaving the train, visitors were exhorted to dedicate themselves to American values by taking the Freedom Pledge and adding their names to a Freedom Scroll. The idea for the Freedom Train, perhaps the most elaborate peacetime patriotic campaign in American history, originated in 1946 with the Department of Justice. President Truman endorsed it as a way of contrasting American freedom with "the destruction of liberty by the Hitler tyranny." Since direct government funding smacked of propaganda, however, the project was turned over to the non-profit American Heritage Foundation, whose board of trustees, dominated by leading bankers and industrialists, was headed by Winthrop W. Aldrich, chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank. By any measure, the Freedom Train was an enormous success. It attracted - 2 - over 3.5 million visitors, and millions more took part in the civic activities that accompanied its journey, including labor-management forums, educational programs, and patriotic parades.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraising the Progressive State
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2017 Appraising the Progressive State Herbert J. Hovenkamp University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Economic History Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, and the Political Economy Commons Repository Citation Hovenkamp, Herbert J., "Appraising the Progressive State" (2017). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1795. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1795 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Appraising the Progressive State HerbertHovenkamp* ABSTRACT: Since its origins in the late 1 9 th century, the most salient characteristicsof the progressive state have been marginalism in economics, the greatly increased use of scientific theory and data in policy making, and the encouragement of broad electoral participation. All have served to make progressive policy less stable than classical and other more laissez-faire alternatives. However, the progressive state has also performed better than alternativesby every economic measure. One of the progressive state's biggest vulnerabilities is commonly said to be its susceptibility to special interest capture. The progressive state makes many decisions via either legislation or administrative agencies, and both are thought to be prone to special interest control at the expense of the public.
    [Show full text]
  • CELEBRATE the 100Th ANNIVERSARY of the NEW REPUBLIC at the NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
    TWEET IT: Celebrate the New Republic’s 100th year anniversary with @FranklinFoer @tnr 12/2 @ConstitutionCtr #NCCTownHall http://bit.ly/1x7Fpuv CONTACTS: Tanaya Neal, 215-409-6716 [email protected] Annie Augustine, 202-508-4482 [email protected] CELEBRATE THE 100th ANNIVERSARY OF THE NEW REPUBLIC AT THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER Philadelphia, PA (November 11, 2014) – The New Republic Editor Franklin Foer joins the National Constitution Center to celebrate the magazine's 100th year anniversary with a discussion of the newly released anthology Insurrections of the Mind: 100 Years of Politics and Culture in America. Foer will sit down with Jeffrey Rosen, President and CEO of the Constitution Center and Legal Affairs Editor at The New Republic, to discuss the book, which features a collection of the magazine’s most seminal essays from an all-star collection of writers. The event will take place on Tuesday, December 2 at 6:30 p.m. Admission is FREE, but reservations are recommended and can be made by calling 215-409-6700 or visiting constitutioncenter.org. All guests will receive a copy of the book as part of admission and a book signing will follow the event. This event is presented in partnership with The New Republic. Described as “a rich volume full of penetrating insights into this country” (Booklist), Insurrections of the Mind explores the pivotal issues of modern America culled from the archives of the magazine from the past century. Notable contributors include, Virginia Woolf, John Maynard Keynes, Vladimir Nabokov, George Orwell, Graham Greene, Philip Roth, Pauline Kael, Michael Lewis, Zadie Smith, and Margaret Talbot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Language: Liberalism As Word and Symbol
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Law Faculty Books and Book Chapters Fowler School of Law 1986 The olitP ics of Language: Liberalism as Word and Symbol Ronald D. Rotunda Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/law_books Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Rotunda, Ronald. The oP litics of Language: Liberalism as Word and Symbol. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 1986. Web. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Fowler School of Law at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Books and Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Politics of Language The Politics of Language,/ Liberalism as Word and Symbol Ronald D. Rotunda Introduction by Daniel Schorr Afterword by M. H. Hoeflich University of Iowa Press Iowa City University of Iowa Press, Iowa City 52242 TO BILL FREIVOGEL Copyright © 1986 by the University of Iowa All rights reserved My lazvyer, if I should Printed in the United States of America ever need one First edition, 1986 Jacket and book design by Richard Hendel Typesetting by G&S Typesetters, Inc., Austin, Texas Printing and binding by Thomson-Shore, Inc., Dexter, Michigan Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rotunda, Ronald D. The politics of language. Includes index. 1. Liberalism-United States-History. 2. Liberalism-Great Britain­ History. 3· Symbolism in politics. I. Title. JA84.U5R69 1986 320.5'1 85-24548 ISBN o-87745-139-7 No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, without permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Just the Facts . . . the New Republic 1789-1824
    Just the Facts . the New Republic 1789-1824 George Washington: 1789-1797 Whiskey Rebellion (1794) Farmers in western Pennsylvania protested tax on whiskey. Father of Our Country Washington responded with 13,000 troops and Did not run for office – unanimously the farmers backed down. This action proved chosen by Electoral College that the new national government had the Set examples (precedents) for future authority to enforce its laws. presidents Birth of Political Parties Washington’s Precedents When Washington left office, political parties Selecting a Cabinet – the president will pick a formed from members of Washington’s group of advisers to help him make decisions. cabinet. “Mr. President” – In a nation afraid of Federalist Party: Alexander Hamilton tyranny, it was agreed this would be a modest wanted an industrialized economy way to address the chief executive. strong national (or central) government Only serve 2 terms – Washington was eager to supported a national bank return to private life after eight years of the favored high tariffs presidency. loose interpretation of the Constitution Farewell Address– When a president leaves Democratic-Republicans: Thomas Jefferson office, he gives a good-bye speech. In wanted an agricultural economy Washington’s farewell address he warned: strong state governments Do not form political parties. opposed a national bank Stay out of debt. favored lower tariffs Avoid entangling alliances with Europe. strict interpretation of the Constitution Domestic/Foreign Policy John Adams: 1797-1801 Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of Treasury, devised a plan to pay off the XYZ Affair When Adams took office the Revolutionary War debt. Southern states French had been raiding American ships.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Virtue for a New Republic: Thomas Jefferson's Embrace of Reason and Sentiment Professor Lipin Stephen Millett May 8
    A New Virtue for a New Republic: Thomas Jefferson’s Embrace of Reason and Sentiment Professor Lipin Stephen Millett May 8, 2007 2 The impact of the American Revolution, and the republican rhetoric that narrated its many and diverse ideals, led to significant changes in American society. Not only did the founders of the new United States successfully form a large-scale republic, but their civic discourse on liberty in speeches, pamphlets, and other written proclamations reveals the degree to which their understandings of Enlightenment republicanism drove the Revolution. Yet this antiquated discourse would become infused with new ideas of liberty and democracy based on liberal and Lockean theories. Thomas Jefferson played an integral role in this transformation. While the founders’ generation was at heart republican, Jefferson’s notions of virtue deviated from classical discourse. By studying Jefferson’s writings a picture of virtue rooted in both sentiment and reason emerges. This essay uncovers a Jeffersonian understanding of virtue that resists classical republican interpretations and indicates that one’s heart and mind both produced a truly virtuous citizen. In doing so, it seeks to portray Jefferson less as the believer in the efficacy of a purely male reason, and to relocate his sense of virtue as something that grows out of domestic relations as much as in the public sphere of politics. i. Jefferson’s autobiography reveals much about his notions of virtue and the importance that this positive character trait has in a republic. However, it is not statements about Jefferson’s own virtue that are remarkable, but rather his opinion of James Madison’s character that expose the attributes reflecting truly virtuous men.
    [Show full text]