STADIUM AREA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT RESIDENCES AT FIVE CREEK PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA

Prepared for:

City of Rohnert Park Development Services 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, CA 94928-2486

Prepared by:

853 Lincoln Way, Suite 208 Auburn, California 95603 Contact: Laura Burris [email protected] 916.835.9671

NOVEMBER 2016

Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...... III 1 INTRODUCTION...... 1 1.1 Project Location ...... 1 1.2 Directions to the Study Area ...... 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 3 3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND...... 5 3.1 Federal Statutes and Regulations – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ...... 5 3.2 State of California ...... 9 3.3 Local ...... 9 4 METHODOLOGY ...... 11 4.1 Literature Review...... 11 4.2 Jurisdictional Delineation ...... 11 4.3 Flora ...... 11 4.4 Field Visit...... 11 5 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISITICS ...... 13 5.1 Land Uses...... 13 5.2 Soils and Topography ...... 13 5.3 Watershed and Hydrology ...... 13 6 RESULTS OF SURVEY ...... 15 6.1 Jurisdictional Delineation ...... 15 6.2 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters ...... 16 7 CONCLUSIONS ...... 17 8 REFERENCES CITED ...... 19 APPENDICES

A Representative Photographs B Plant Species Observed C Data Sheets D Aquatic Resources Spreadsheet

9810 i November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. FIGURES

1 Regional Map ...... 21 2 Vicinity Map ...... 23 3 Site Map ...... 25 4 Soils ...... 27 5 Potentially Jurisdictional Features ...... 29 TABLES

Table 1 Wetlands and Waters within the Study Area ...... 16

9810 ii November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Acronym/Abbreviation Definition ACOE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CWA Clean Water Act NWI National Wetland Inventory OHWM ordinary high water mark Porter-Cologne Act Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act TNW traditional navigable waters

9810 iii November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 iv November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

1 INTRODUCTION

This report documents the results of a preliminary jurisdictional delineation of waters of the United States (U.S.) and wetlands for the Stadium Area Master Plan (SAMP) Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Project and City Public Safety/Public Works Facilities (project) located in the City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, California. The results of this delineation are preliminary until verified by the San Francisco District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE).

1.1 Project Location

The proposed project site (study area) is located in Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, California. The proposed project would be located on one 15.30 acres parcel (Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 143-040-124) bounded by Dowdell Avenue to the east, Labath Avenue to the west, Carlson Avenue to the north, and Hinebaugh Creek to the south. The study area occurs in Section 23, Township 6 North, and Range 8 West of the U.S. Geological Survey Cotati 7.5’ quadrangle. The approximate center of the study area corresponds to 38.3522 north latitude and -122.7197 west longitude (Figure 1).

The northern portion of the project site includes plans for the Residences at Five Creek, which proposes to include 135 multifamily residential units, 34,400 square feet (sf) of commercial space, a 132-room hotel, and a 0.65-acre park. The southern portion of the site includes plans for a new City of Rohnert Park Public Safety facility (fire station) and Public Works corporation yard. The proposed project includes offsite improvements including a storm drain outfall to Hinebaugh Creek directly south and west of the main project area (Figure 2).

1.2 Directions to the Study Area

The study area can be accessed from Labath Avenue off of Rohnert Park Expressway. From San Francisco, travel north on U.S. Highway 101. Take Exit 483 onto Rohnert Park Expressway. Turn right onto Labath Avenue. The study area is on the right approximately 0.15 miles north of the intersection of Rohnert Park Expressway and Labath Avenue.

9810 1 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 2 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed project would amend the SAMP Final Development Plan to include changes associated with two proposed development projects within the Plan area: the Residences at Five Creek and the City Public Safety / Public Works facilities (collectively referred to as the “proposed project”). The Residences at Five Creek project applicant, MW Investments LLC, is proposing a mixed use development consisting of a 132-room hotel, 34,300 sf of retail and commercial uses, approximately 135 multi-family residential units, and a 0.65-acre public park on the roughly 12.50-acre parcel. The City is proposing to construct a new Public Safety facility (fire station) and Public Works offices and corporation yard on the approximately 3.0-acre site located immediately south of Martin Avenue and the site of the proposed Residences at Five Creek development.

The project would require the construction of a new system to drain on-site runoff. This system would require a new 36” storm water outfall to Hinebaugh Creek, just west of the existing Labath Avenue Bridge. The line would run south of the project site then west across Labath Avenue just north of the Hinebaugh creek trail. New manholes would be constructed in Labath Avenue and another constructed in the Hinebaugh Creek trail approximately 20 feet west of Labath Avenue. The 36” storm water line would then extend underground from the creek trail manhole to a concrete collar. From the collar, the storm water line would slope underground at approximately a 0.5% grade to the outfall location, where it daylights into the creek. The invert of the outfall is approximately 12” above the creek bottom.

Construction of the storm water outfall area would consist of keying in riprap underneath and in front of the outfall location to dissipate high flows prior to entering the channel. Directly above the riprap and below the outfall pipe, a gravel sand substrate would be installed for low flow infiltration into the channel. Native backfill would be placed over the pipe once the outfall is constructed to return the channel to its original configuration. The small area of the creek slope that would be affected by the outfall and pipe construction would have an erosion mat placed on the topsoil. Seed for grasses would be established on top of the erosion mat, bringing the area disturbed during construction back to its original state.

The new storm drain system would be designed to accept runoff from 15.25 acres of the Residence at Five Creek site, the City Public Safety and Public Works site, and one additional adjacent parcel, for a total tributary area of 17.08 acres. The storm drain system would be designed to accommodate the 10-year storm event.

9810 3 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 4 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND 3.1 Federal Statutes and Regulations – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Any person or public agency proposing to discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including jurisdictional wetlands, must obtain a permit from the ACOE.

As defined in Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 328.3, waters of the United States include all waters subject to interstate or foreign commerce, including tidal waters, interstate waters and wetlands, many intrastate waters, impoundments, tributaries, the territorial seas, and adjacent wetlands. Specifically, Section 328.3 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations defines waters of the United States as follows:

a. For purposes of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. and its implementing regulations, subject to the exclusions in paragraph (b) of this section, the term “waters of the United States” means: 1) All waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; 2) All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; 3) The territorial seas; 4) All impoundments of waters otherwise identified as waters of the United States under this section; 5) All tributaries, as defined in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, of waters identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section; 6) All waters adjacent to a water identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section, including wetlands, ponds, lakes, oxbows, impoundments, and similar waters. b. The following are not “waters of the United States” even where they otherwise meet the terms of paragraphs (a)(4) through (8) of this section. 1) Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act. 2) Prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding the determination of an area’s status as prior converted cropland by any other Federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA.

9810 5 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

For non-tidal waters of the United States, the lateral limits of ACOE jurisdiction extend to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) when no adjacent wetlands are present. Defined in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33, Section 328.3(e), the OHWM is “that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as a clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas.” If adjacent wetlands are present, the jurisdiction extends to the limit of wetlands.

Wetlands are “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions” (33 CFR 328.3). Wetlands are jurisdictional if they meet this definition and the definition of waters of the United States. ACOE predominantly uses the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (ACOE 2008a) methodology to determine the presence of wetlands. According to the manual (ACOE 2008a), three criteria must be satisfied to classify an area as a wetland: (1) a predominance of plant life that is adapted to life in wet conditions (hydrophytic vegetation); (2) soils that saturate, flood, or pond long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (hydric soils); and (3) permanent or periodic inundation or soils saturation, at least seasonally (wetland hydrology). Further guidance for determining jurisdictional limits in ephemeral riverine systems in the Arid West is detailed in A Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States (ACOE 2008b).

In the last two decades, two major court cases have affected the jurisdictional reach of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA): (1) Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Corps of Engineers, and (2) Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers.

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Corps of Engineers

In 1986, in an attempt to clarify the reach of its jurisdiction, ACOE stated that Section 404(a) of the CWA extends to intrastate waters (51 FR 41217):

a. which are or would be used as habitat by birds protected by Migratory Bird Treaties; or b. which are or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds which cross state lines; or c. which are or would be used as habitat for endangered species; or d. used to irrigate crops sold in interstate commerce.

9810 6 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

In 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court, in its judgment on the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County case, held that Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33, Section 328.3(a)(3), as clarified and applied to the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County site pursuant to the Migratory Bird Rule (51 FR 41217), exceeded the authority granted to ACOE under Section 404(a) of the CWA. Therefore, ACOE may not rely on the Migratory Bird Rule to establish a “significant nexus” to interstate or foreign commerce. In additional language, the U.S. Supreme Court majority opinion reasoned that these types of waters required some nexus to navigable waters. Although no formal guidance was issued by ACOE interpreting the extent to which the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County decision would limit jurisdictional determinations, in practice, ACOE considers intrastate waters as waters of the United States where there is an appropriate connection to navigable water or other clear interstate commerce connection (Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Corps of Engineers 2001).

Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court again issued an opinion on to what extent ACOE had jurisdiction over certain waters under Section 404 of the CWA. The Rapanos-Carabell consolidated decisions addressed the question of jurisdiction over attenuated tributaries to waters of the United States, as well as wetlands adjacent to those tributaries (Rapanos v. United States 2006).

ACOE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued guidance related to the Rapanos decision on June 5, 2007. The guidance identifies the waters the agencies (i.e., ACOE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) will assert jurisdiction over categorically and on a case- by-case basis, based on the reasoning of the Rapanos opinions. In summary, ACOE will continue to assert jurisdiction over the following:

 Traditional navigable waters (TNWs) and their adjacent wetlands.  Non-navigable tributaries of TNWs that are relatively permanent (e.g., tributaries that typically flow year-round or have a continuous flow at least seasonally) and wetlands that directly abut such tributaries (e.g., not separated by uplands, berm, dike, or similar feature). Note: Relatively permanent waters do not include ephemeral tributaries, which flow only in response to precipitation, and intermittent streams, which do not typically flow year- round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months).  Non-relatively permanent waters, if determined (on a fact-specific analysis) to have a significant nexus with a TNW, including non-navigable tributaries that do not typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally, wetlands adjacent to such tributaries, and wetlands adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent, are non-navigable tributary. Absent a significant nexus, jurisdiction is lacking.

9810 7 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

A significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more than a speculative or an insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical, and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Principal considerations when evaluating significant nexus include volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and the proximity of the tributary to a TNW, including hydrologic, ecologic, and other functions performed by the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands. Certain ephemeral waters in the Arid West are distinguishable from the geographic features described previously, where such ephemeral waters are tributaries and have a significant nexus to downstream TNWs. For example, these ephemeral tributaries may serve as a transitional area between the upland environment and the TNW. These ephemeral tributaries may provide habitat for wildlife and aquatic organisms in downstream TNWs and support nutrient cycling, sediment retention and transport, pollutant trapping and filtration, and improvement of water quality.

Swales or erosional features (e.g., gullies and small washes characterized by low-volume, infrequent, or short-duration flow) are generally not considered waters of the United States because they are not tributaries or they do not have a significant nexus to downstream TNWs. In addition, ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only uplands, and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water, are generally not considered waters of the United States because they are not tributaries or they do not have a significant nexus to downstream TNWs. Even when not jurisdictional under Section 404 of the CWA, these features may still be jurisdictional at state or local levels, such as under Section 401 of the CWA, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne Act), and/or Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code.

Prior to the Rapanos guidance, ACOE required its regional districts to request concurrence for only those jurisdictional determinations where the district was planning to assert jurisdiction over a non-navigable, intrastate isolated water and/or wetland. The agencies now require that all determinations for non-navigable, isolated waters be evaluated for ACOE and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency headquarters review prior to the district making a final decision on the jurisdictional determination.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers–Regulated Activities

ACOE regulates activities under Section 404 of the CWA that involve a discharge of dredged or fill material, including but not limited to grading, placing riprap for erosion control, pouring concrete, laying sod, and stockpiling excavated material into waters of the United States. Activities that generally do not involve a regulated discharge (if performed specifically in a manner to avoid discharges) include driving pilings, providing some drainage channel maintenance activities, and excavating without stockpiling.

9810 8 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

3.2 State of California

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

Pursuant to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife regulates all diversions, obstructions, or changes to the natural flow or bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake that supports fish or wildlife.

In Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1.72, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife defines a “stream” (including creeks and rivers) as “a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and supports fish or other aquatic life. This includes watercourses having a surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation.”

In Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1.56, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s definition of “lake” includes “natural lakes or man-made reservoirs.” Diversion, obstruction, or change to the natural flow or bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake that supports fish or wildlife requires authorization from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife by means of entering into an agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code.

California Regional Water Quality Control Board

Pursuant to Section 401 of the federal CWA, the Regional Water Quality Control Board regulates discharging waste, or proposing to discharge waste, within any region that could affect a “water of the state” (California Water Code, Section 13260(a)), pursuant to provisions of the Porter-Cologne Act. Waters of the state are defined as “any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state” (California Water Code, Section 13050(e)). Before ACOE will issue a CWA Section 404 permit, applicants must receive a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. If a CWA Section 404 permit is not required for the project, the Regional Water Quality Control Board may still require a permit (i.e., Waste Discharge Requirement) for impacts to waters of the state under the Porter-Cologne Act.

3.3 Local

Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy

The project site is located within the area covered by the Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy (USFWS, 2005). The purpose of the Conservation Strategy is to create a long-term conservation program to assist in the recovery of California tiger salamander and four listed plant species (covered species). No CTS or special status plant species were found in any of the wetlands surveyed in 2001-2002 and 2005 within the SAMP. In addition, the U.S. Department Fish and

9810 9 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a letter, included as Appendix B to the SAMP EIR, determining that development in the SAMP area, including the project site, would be unlikely to affect CTS. Subsequent correspondence with the USFWS (2015) has confirmed that “the letter for this project was a determination of not likely to result in take of listed species and since ground disturbance has already occurred on the site, no additional effects to listed species are expected from the further development of the site”. The offsite study area for the storm drain outfall is located within the Area of No Effect on the Santa Rosa Plain map and does not provide suitable habitat for covered species.

9810 10 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

4 METHODOLOGY 4.1 Literature Review

Prior to conducting fieldwork, the following available resources were reviewed to assess the potential for jurisdictional features:

 1:200-scale aerial photograph (Bing Maps 2016; Google Earth 2016)  U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (USGS 2016)  U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey (USDA 2016a)  National Wetland Inventory (USFWS 2016a)

4.2 Jurisdictional Delineation

Potential wetland waters of the United States were delineated based on methodology described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (ACOE 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (ACOE 2008a). Non-wetland waters of the United States are delineated based on the presence of an OHWM, as determined using the methodology in A Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States (ACOE 2008b). Dudek biologists collected photographic records that represent the on-site habitats and wetlands (Appendix A).

4.3 Flora

All plant species encountered during the field surveys were identified and recorded. Those species that could not be identified immediately were brought into the laboratory for further investigation. Latin names follow the Jepson Interchange List of Currently Accepted Names of Native and Naturalized Plants of California (Jepson Flora Project 2016), and common names follow the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Plants Database (USDA 2016b). Appendix B contains a complete list of plant species observed during the surveys.

4.4 Field Visit

The study area was visited on October 20, 2016, by Dudek Biologist Laura Burris to document current site conditions and assess potential wetlands and other waters of the United States. The field visit consisted of a Level 2 Routine Determination On-site Inspection (as defined in the

9810 11 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

Wetland Delineation Manual), evaluating three parameters that identify and delineate the boundaries of jurisdictional wetlands, including (1) the dominance of wetland vegetation; (2) the presence of hydric soils; and (3) hydrologic conditions that result in periods of inundation or saturation on the surface from flooding or ponding. An assessment of the OHWM was performed at Hinebaugh Creek, as defined in the guidance (ACOE 2008b). The results are presented in Section 6, Results of Survey.

9810 12 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

5 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISITICS 5.1 Land Uses

The study area is located in the northwest portion of the City in an area predominately characterized by existing commercial and industrial/business uses. The site is located west of Highway 101, bounded by Carlson Avenue on the north, Labath Avenue on the west, Hinebaugh Creek on the south, and Dowdell Avenue on the east. The site is located adjacent to Costco, Ashley Furniture and KRCB Public Radio Station.

5.2 Soils and Topography

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (2016a), only one soil type occurs within the study area: Clear Lake clay, sandy substratum, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 14 (Figure 4). Clear Lake soil series are generally very deep, poorly drained soils formed in fine textured alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. These soils are common in basins and in swales of drainageways; the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service considers this soil type hydric (USDA 2016a).

The study area slopes slightly from north to south, with a change in topography from approximately 95 feet above mean sea level to 91 feet above mean sea level.

5.3 Watershed and Hydrology

The study area is part of the Upper Laguna De Santa Rosa watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code 180101100701). Hydrology at the study area has been altered through development by the introduction of fill and the channelization of historic creeks. The main study area is primarily flat, sloping very slightly from north to south. The stream channel of Hinebaugh Creek contains steep banks that channel water to the low flow channel.

9810 13 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 14 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

6 RESULTS OF SURVEY 6.1 Jurisdictional Delineation

The dominant vegetation community within the study area consists of California annual grassland, most of which is disturbed. A riparian corridor occurs along Hinebaugh Creek and appears to have been restored/planted within the last ten years. There are no wetland features within the study area with the exception of the channel of Hinebaugh Creek (Figure 5). These land cover types and the habitat in Hinebaugh Creek are described in more detail in the following text.

Upland Habitats

California Annual Grassland

California annual grassland is present throughout the study area. Dominant species observed on- site within the grassland community included wild oat (Avena fatua), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), and soft brome (Bromus hordeaceus). Several other native and non-native species were also present, including black mustard (Brassica nigra) and yellow star-thistle (Centaurea solstitialis).

Riparian Woodland

Young riparian woodland trees and shrubs are present along Hinebaugh Creek (Figure 5). Species observed include California black walnut (Juglans hindsii), shining willow (Salix lasiolepis), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). Vegetation in the understory consists of grasses such as canary reed grass (Phalaris aquatica) and Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), and forbs such as fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), curly dock (Rumex crispus), horse tail (Equisetum hymale), and bristly oxtongue (Helminthotheca eschioides).

Other Waters of the United States

Hinebaugh Creek

Hinebaugh Creek creates the southern border of the main project site. The storm water outlet for the project site will drain into this stream channel to the south and west of the main project site. Hinebaugh Creek is a perennial creek with a defined bed and bank. Vegetation within the wetted portion of the channel included cattail (Typha latioflia), horsetail, and common knotweed (Persicaria lapathifolia). Water was present in the stream channel at the time of the site visit.

9810 15 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

The channel is approximately 25 feet wide at the OHWM and 70 feet wide at the top of the bank. The channel is classified by the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) as persistent palustrine emergent wetland that has been excavated by artificial means and is semi permanently flooded. Hinebaugh Creek appears to channel water from east to west, connecting to the Laguna de Santa Rosa approximately 0.6 miles west of the study area. The Laguna de Santa Rosa eventually meets the Russian River, a water of the U.S., north of the study area. Thus, Hinebaugh Creek is considered a relatively permanent water that drains to other waters of the U.S. and is potentially jurisdictional.

6.2 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters

The study area does not support TNWs, interstate waters, or waters that support interstate commerce (33 CFR 328.3(a) parts 1–4); therefore, potential ACOE jurisdiction was determined based on connectivity or adjacency to off-site waters of the United States (CFR 328.3(a) part 5).

Figure 5 depicts the geographic extent of potentially jurisdictional water features within the study area, and Table 1 includes the total extent (acreage or linear feet) of water features. An aquatic resources table in accordance with ACOE format is presented in Appendix D.

Table 1 Wetlands and Waters within the Study Area

Feature Jurisdiction Acres Linear Feet Wetlands None N/A 0 0 Total 0 0 Other Waters Hinebaugh Creek Jurisdictional 0.0026 0 Total 0.0026 0 Note: N/A = not applicable

9810 16 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

7 CONCLUSIONS

The study area supports a total of 0.0026 acres of waters that are anticipated to meet the criteria for jurisdictional waters of the United States, including wetlands, based on an analysis of the three parameters for wetlands (soils, hydrology, and vegetation), an analysis of the OHWM, and connectivity/proximity to known waters of the United States.

All features identified during the site visit are considered potentially jurisdictional until verified by the ACOE.

9810 17 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 18 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

8 REFERENCES CITED

33 CFR 328.1–328.5. Definition of Waters of the United States.

51 FR 41217. Final Rule. “Migratory Bird Rule.” November 13, 1986.

ACOE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Online ed. Environmental Laboratory, Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y- 87-1. Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. January 1987. Accessed June 2015. http://www.fedcenter.gov/Bookmarks/ index.cfm?id=6403&pge_id=1606.

ACOE. 2008a. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0). Environmental Laboratory, ERDC/EL TR-08-28. Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. September 2008. Accessed October 2016. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/ pdf/trel08-28.pdf.

ACOE. 2008b. A Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States. Accessed October 2016. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a486603.pdf.

Bing Maps. 2016. [aerial photograph]. 1:200 scale.

California Water Code, Section 13000–16104. Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, as amended. Prepared by the State Water Resources Control Board, with additions and amendments (shown as tracked changes) effective January 1, 2011. Accessed October 2016. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/laws_regulations/.

Google Earth. 2016. [aerial photograph]. 1:200 scale.

Jepson Flora Project. 2016. Jepson eFlora. Berkeley, California: University of California. Accessed October 2016. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/get_JM_name_data.pl.

Rapanos et ux., et al. v. United States. 547 U.S. 715 (2006); no. 04-1034. Supreme Court decision on Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Accessed October 2016. http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/pdf/ Rapanos_SupremeCourt.pdf.

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Corps of Engineers et al., 531 U.S. 159 (2001), no. 99–1178.

9810 19 November 2016 Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2016a. Web Soil Survey. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff. Accessed November 1, 2015. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

USDA. 2016b. PLANTS database. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Last updated August 15, 2016. Accessed October 2016. http://plants.usda.gov/java/.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy. December 1.

USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2016a. National Wetlands Inventory. Accessed October 2016. fws.gov/wetlands/NWI/index.html.

USFWS. 2016b. “Wetland Classification Codes.” Last updated July 26, 2016. Accessed October 32016. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Wetland-Codes.html.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2016. “Auburn, CA” [map]. 7.5-Minute Series (Topographic). Accessed October 2016. http://store.usgs.gov/b2c_usgs/b2c/usgs/netfile?file=// igskahcigssap05/MOD/StoreFiles/DenverPDFs/24K/CA/CA_Auburn_1981.pdf.

9810 20 November 2016 253 20 53 5 Kelseyville Clearlake 281 Colusa County Lower Lake Yolo County

175 16 Mendocino County Cobb Sonoma CountyLake County Hidden Sonoma County Valley Lake

Yolo County Lake County Napa County Napa County

29

Angwin Windsor Deer Park Larkfield- St. Wikiup 116 Helena Forestville Santa Rosa 128 Napa County Sonoma County Occidental South 12 Santa Rosa

Project Site Rohnert 121 Bodega Park Bay 1 Napa County 101 Napa Solano County Fairfield 221 Petaluma 80 Sonoma County

Marin County American Canyon 37 680 Novato Vallejo

Inverness 780 Benicia Lucas Valley- Rodeo Lagunitas-Forest Marinwood Vine Knolls Hercules 4 Hill San Pinole Martinez Rafael Concord Pleasant Richmond Hill Mill Valley Walnut 123 P a c i f i c 131 Lafayette Creek Berkeley Marin Orinda Alamo County 24 13 Moraga O c e a n Town Oakland

San Alameda 580 Francisco 880

0 5 10 San Francisco County San Castro Miles San Mateo County Leandro Valley Fairview SOURCE: Sonoma County GIS FIGURE 1 Regional Map

The Residences at Five Creek & City Public Safety Project City of Rohnert Park Date: 11/4/2016 - Last saved by: rstrobridge - Path: Z:\Projects\j981000\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\ResidencesAtFiveCreek\JD\Figure1_Regional.mxd Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 22 November 2016 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Project Boundary

SOURCE: Sonoma County GIS; USGS 7.5-Minute Series Cotati Quadrangle Township 6N, Range 8W, Section 23 FIGURE 2 Vicinity Map

The Residences at Five Creek & City Public Safety Project City of Rohnert Park Date: 11/4/2016 - Last saved by: rstrobridge - Path: Z:\Projects\j981000\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\ResidencesAtFiveCreek\JD\Figure2_Vicinity.mxd Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 24 November 2016 Project Boundary Ordinary High Water Mark 0 100 200 Feet Top of Bank

SOURCE: Sonoma County GIS; Bing Maps (Accessed 2016) FIGURE 3 Site Map

The Residences at Five Creek & City Public Safety Project City of Rohnert Park Date: 11/7/2016 - Last saved by: rstrobridge - Path: Z:\Projects\j981000\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\ResidencesAtFiveCreek\JD\Figure3_Site.mxd Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 26 November 2016 Project Boundary 50' Buffer Ordinary High Water Mark Top of Bank Soil Type 0 100 200 Feet CeA, Clear Lake clay, 0 - 2% slopes

SOURCE: Sonoma County GIS; Bing Maps (Accessed 2016); USDA NRCS FIGURE 4 Soil Map

The Residences at Five Creek & City Public Safety Project City of Rohnert Park Date: 11/7/2016 - Last saved by: rstrobridge - Path: Z:\Projects\j981000\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\ResidencesAtFiveCreek\JD\Figure4_Soils.mxd Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 28 November 2016 Stormwater Outfall Location

Project Boundary Ordinary High Water Mark 0 75 150 Feet Top of Bank

SOURCE: Sonoma County GIS; Bing Maps (Accessed 2016) FIGURE 5 Potentially Jurisdictional Features

The Residences at Five Creek & City Public Safety Project City of Rohnert Park Date: 11/4/2016 - Last saved by: rstrobridge - Path: Z:\Projects\j981000\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\ResidencesAtFiveCreek\JD\Figure5_JD.mxd Stadium Area Master Plan Amendment – Residences at Five Creek Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

9810 30 November 2016

APPENDIX A Representative Photos

APPENDIX A Representative Photos

Photo 1: View of bank and riparian vegetation on the north side of Hinebaugh Creek, facing west. August 20, 2016.

Photo 2: Hinebaugh Creek, facing southwest. August 20, 2016.

9635 A-1 August 2016 APPENDIX A (Continued)

Photo 3: View of the stormwater outfall area with the main study area in the background across Labath Avenue, facing east. August 20, 2016.

9810 A-2 November 2016

APPENDIX B Plant Species Observed

APPENDIX B Plant Species Observed

VASCULAR SPECIES

FERNS AND FERN ALLIES

POACEAE—GRASS FAMILY Equisetum hyemale—Scouringrush horsetail (FACW)

MONOCOTS

POACEAE—GRASS FAMILY * Avena fatua—wild oat (NL) * Bromus diandrus—ripgut brome (NL) * Bromus hordeaceus—soft brome (FACU) * Cynodon dactylon—Bermudagrass (FACU) * Echinochloa crus-galli—barnyardgrass (FACW) * Hordeum marinum—seaside barley (FAC) * Phalaris aquatica—reed canary grass (FACU)

TYPHACEAE—CATTAIL FAMILY Typha latifolia—broadleaf cattail (OBL)

EUDICOTS

ASTERACEAE—SUNFLOWER FAMILY * Carduus pycnocephalus—Italian plumeless thistle (NL) * Centaurea solstitialis—yellow star-thistle (NL) * Helminthotheca eschioides—bristly oxtongue (FAC) * Hypochaeris glabra—smooth cat’s ear (NL) * Lactuca serriola—prickly lettuce (FACU)

BRASSICACEAE—MUSTARD FAMILY * Brassica nigra—black mustard (NL)

EUPHORBIACEAE—SPURGE FAMILY Croton setiger—dove weed (NL)

FABACEAE—LEGUME FAMILY Acmispon americanus—American deerweed (UPL)

GERANIACEAE—GERANIUM FAMILY * Erodium cicutarium—redstem stork’s bill (NL)

9810 B-1 November 2016 APPENDIX B (Continued)

JUGLANDACEAE—WALNUT FAMILY * Juglans hindsii—California black walnut (FAC)

ONAGRACEAE—EVENING PRIMROSE FAMILY Epilobium ciliatum—fringed willowherb (FACW)

PLANTAGINACEAE—PLANTAIN FAMILY * Plantago lanceolata—narrowleaf plantain (FAC)

POLYGONACEAE—BUCKWHEAT FAMILY Persicaria lapathifolia—common knotweed (FACW) * Rumex crispus—curly dock (FAC)

ROSACEAE—ROSE FAMILY * Rubus armeniacus—Himalayan blackberry (FAC)

SALICACEAE—WILLOW FAMILY Salix exigua—narrowleaf willow (FACW) Salix laevigata—red willow (FACW) Salix lasiandra—Pacific willow (FACW)

SAPINDACEAE—SOAPBERRY FAMILY Aesculus californica—California buckeye (NL)

* signifies introduced (non-native) species

National Wetlands Plant List Indicator Definitions: NL – Not listed; upland plant species not included in the national wetland plant list OBL – Obligate; almost always occur in wetlands FACW – Usually occur in wetlands, but may occur in non-wetlands FAC – Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands FACU – Usually occur in non-wetlands, but may occur in wetlands UPL – Almost never occur in wetlands

9810 B-2 November 2016

APPENDIX C Data Sheets

APPENDIX D Aquatic Resources Spreadsheet

Waters_Name Cowadin_Code HGM_Code Measurement_Type Amount Units Waters_Types Latitude Longitude Local_Waterway Hinebaugh Creek PEM1 RIVERINE Area 0.00260000000 ACRE RPW 38.3522 -122.7197 Laguna de Santa Rosa