DOCSLIB.ORG

Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time Arxiv:1812.01615V2 [Astro-Ph.GA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time Arxiv:1812.01615V2 [Astro-Ph.GA Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time Mark R. Krumholz1;2, Christopher F. McKee3, and Joss Bland-Hawthorn2;4;5 1Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia; email: [email protected] 2Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in Three Dimensions (ASTRO-3D), Australia 3Departments of Astronomy and of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics A28, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 5Miller Professor, Miller Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA arXiv:1812.01615v2 [astro-ph.GA] 13 Dec 2018 1 Xxxx. Xxx. Xxx. Xxx. 2019. 59:1{76 Keywords This article's doi: star clusters, star formation, globular clusters, open clusters and 10.1146/((please add article doi)) associations, stellar abundances Copyright c 2019 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Abstract Star clusters stand at the intersection of much of modern astrophysics: the interstellar medium, gravitational dynamics, stellar evolution, and cosmology. Here we review observations and theoretical models for the formation, evolution, and eventual disruption of star clusters. Current literature suggests a picture of this life cycle with several phases: • Clusters form in hierarchically-structured, accreting molecular clouds that convert gas into stars at a low rate per dynamical time until feedback disperses the gas. • The densest parts of the hierarchy resist gas removal long enough to reach high star formation efficiency, becoming dynamically- relaxed and well-mixed. These remain bound after gas removal. • In the first ∼ 100 Myr after gas removal, clusters disperse mod- erately fast, through a combination of mass loss and tidal shocks by dense molecular structures in the star-forming environment. • After ∼ 100 Myr, clusters lose mass via two-body relaxation and shocks by giant molecular clouds, processes that preferentially affect low-mass clusters and cause a turnover in the cluster mass function to appear on ∼ 1 − 10 Gyr timescales. • Even after dispersal, some clusters remain coherent and thus de- tectable in chemical or action space for multiple galactic orbits. In the next decade a new generation of space- and AO-assisted ground-based telescopes will enable us to test and refine this picture. 2 Krumholz, McKee, & Bland-Hawthorn Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................3 1.1. Historical background and motivation ..................................................................3 1.2. Prelude: what is a star cluster?.........................................................................5 2. DEMOGRAPHICS: OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ...................................................7 2.1. Methods.................................................................................................7 2.2. Mass distribution ........................................................................................ 11 2.3. Age distribution ......................................................................................... 13 2.4. Bound mass fraction .................................................................................... 15 2.5. Size and density ......................................................................................... 18 2.6. Elemental abundances .................................................................................. 20 2.7. The limits of demography at young ages ............................................................... 21 3. BIRTH........................................................................................................ 22 3.1. Initial conditions for star cluster formation ............................................................. 22 3.2. Conversion of gas to stars .............................................................................. 26 3.3. Feedback and the termination of star formation ....................................................... 31 3.4. Star formation histories and timescales ................................................................. 37 3.5. Emergence of the gas-free cluster population .......................................................... 42 3.6. Elemental abundance distributions ..................................................................... 46 4. LIFE AND DEATH........................................................................................... 47 4.1. Star cluster structure and tides ......................................................................... 47 4.2. Internal evolutionary processes.......................................................................... 49 4.3. External and environmental processes .................................................................. 52 4.4. Models of the full cluster population ................................................................... 55 5. AFTERLIFE .................................................................................................. 58 5.1. Kinematics .............................................................................................. 59 5.2. Action-angle space ...................................................................................... 59 5.3. Chemical tagging ........................................................................................ 61 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS ............................................................. 62 1. INTRODUCTION The galaxy is in fact nothing but a congeries of innumerable stars grouped together in clusters. Siderius Nuncius (Sidereal Messenger), Galileo Galilei, 1610 1.1. Historical background and motivation After four centuries since Galileo's first observations, star clusters remain mysterious. What are the uni- fying principles that govern the formation of globular and open clusters, groups, associations and super- associations? As illustrated in Figure 11, clusters cover a huge range of mass, size, and density scales. The 2 6 clusters shown span ages from ∼ 1 Myr to > 10 Gyr, and masses from ∼ 10 − 10 M . Some are so 1The source code and data tabulations used to produce all the figures in this review are available at https: //bitbucket.org/krumholz/cluster_review/, and also are provided as Supplementary Materials. We make use of the following software packages: scipy (Oliphant 2007; Millman & Aivazis 2011), matplotlib (Hunter 2007), astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013), and SLUG (da Silva, Fumagalli & Krumholz 2012; Krumholz et al. 2015b). www.annualreviews.org Star clusters 3 • ONC, T < 3 Myr Arches, T 2 3 Myr NGC 265, T 250 Myr Hyades, T 625 Myr ≈ − ≈ ≈ 0.68 pc 0.40 pc 0.29 pc 0.41 pc 0.1◦ 1000 100 0.5◦ Coll 261, T 7 Gyr NGC 6535, T > 10 Gyr 47 Tuc, T > 10 Gyr NGC 1252: Fake News ≈ 0.39 pc 0.32 pc 0.43 pc 0.38 pc 3000 1000 2000 20 Figure 1 Images of a range of star clusters, along with NGC 1252, an object previously classified as a cluster but now known to be an asterism. The field of view in all frames is 3 pc 3 pc, and North is up; angular sizes are indicated by × scale bars. Image sources are: Orion Nebular Cluster (ONC) { Robberto et al.(2013); Arches cluster { NASA & ESA; NGC 265 { NASA & ESA; Davide De Martin (ESA/Hubble) and Edward W. Olszewski (University of Arizona, USA); Hyades { NASA, ESA, & STScI; Collinder 261 { ESO/Digitized Sky Survey; NGC 6535 { ESA/Hubble & NASA, Gilles Chapdelaine; 47 Tuc { NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)-ESA/Hubble Collaboration; J. Mack (STScI) and G. Piotto (University of Padova, Italy); NGC 1252 { WEBDA database, https://www.univie.ac.at/webda/. compact and rich that stars become lost in confusion in the 3 pc-frames shown, others are so sparse and extended that most cluster members are outside the frame. Some are classified as open clusters (Arches, NGC 265, Hyades, Coll 261), some as globular clusters (NGC 6535, 47 Tuc). The Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC) is still forming and, depending on the author, might not even be classified as a cluster at all. NGC 1252 had been classified as an open cluster since 1888, but in 2018 was shown to be merely an asterism (Kos et al. 2018b). Cluster formation is central to the star formation process. Conceivably, all stars formed in groups, clusters, or hierarchies, although, for this to be true, most clusters must have dissolved into the Galactic background soon after formation. However, our understanding of when, how, and why stars cluster remains primitive (see reviews by Krumholz et al. 2014, Renaud 2018, and Adamo & Bastian 2018). A review of clusters is timely for several reasons. One is the emerging overlap between the traditionally separate communities focused on globular clusters and modern-day star clusters and star formation. These have been separate in the past because star clusters in the disk of the Milky Way, generally classified as open clusters (OCs), and those in the halo, generally classified as globular clusters (GCs), appear to occupy distinct loci in the parameter space of mass, age, and metallicity. New data have begun to blur this distinction: even in the Milky Way there is substantial overlap in both metallicity and density between OCs 4 Krumholz, McKee, & Bland-Hawthorn and GCs, and in rapidly star-forming local galaxies such as the Antennae (Zhang & Fall 1999) and M82 Surveys referenced (McCrady & Graham 2007) there is overlap in mass as well. While there is still a bimodality in the star in this review: cluster age and spatial distribution, this may simply reflect the combined
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Milky Way Halo Star Cluster in the Southern Galactic Sky
    The Astrophysical Journal, 767:101 (6pp), 2013 April 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/101 C 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. A NEW MILKY WAY HALO STAR CLUSTER IN THE SOUTHERN GALACTIC SKY E. Balbinot1,2, B. X. Santiago1,2, L. da Costa2,3,M.A.G.Maia2,3,S.R.Majewski4, D. Nidever5, H. J. Rocha-Pinto2,6, D. Thomas7, R. H. Wechsler8,9, and B. Yanny10 1 Instituto de F´ısica, UFRGS, CP 15051, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio´ Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia–LIneA, Rua Gal. Jose´ Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921-400, Brazil 3 Observatorio´ Nacional, Rua Gal. Jose´ Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22460-040, Brazil 4 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA 5 Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA 6 Observatorio´ do Valongo, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20080-090, Brazil 7 Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2UP, UK 8 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA 9 Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 10 Fermi National Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510-5011, USA Received 2012 October 8; accepted 2013 February 28; published 2013 April 1 ABSTRACT We report on the discovery of a new Milky Way (MW) companion stellar system located at (αJ 2000,δJ 2000) = (22h10m43s.15, 14◦5658.8).
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Constellations
    Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great ​ ​ hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar ​ ​ ​ nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. ​ ​ 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming ​ “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the ​ Orion Nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxies NGC 4038/9
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server A Multi-transition CO Study of The \Antennae" Galaxies NGC 4038/9 Ming Zhu1,E.R.Seaquist1, and Nario Kuno2 ABSTRACT For the Antennae interacting galaxy pair, we have obtained high quality, fully sampled 12CO J=1–0 and 3–2 maps of the regions surrounding the nuclei and the area of overlap between the two galaxies. The maps possess an angular resolution of 1500 or 1.5 kpc, so far the highest resolution maps available at both the J=1–0 and 3–2 transitions. In addition, 12CO J=2–1 data have been obtained for the positions of the two nuclei as well as in part of the overlap 12 region with 2000 angular resolution. The CO J=1–0, 2–1, 3–2 emission all peak in an off-nucleus region adjacent to where the two disks overlap. Use of the conventional X factor yields 4 109 M molecular gas mass in the overlap ∼ × region. It is difficult to understand how such a large amount of molecular gas can be accumulated in this region given the relatively short lifetime of molecular clouds and the limited period of time for this region to form. Line emission at 13CO J=2–1 and 3–2 is detected at selected points in the two nuclei and the overlap region. Both the 12CO/13CO J=2–1 and 3–2 integrated intensity ratios are remarkably high in the overlap region. This is the first published case in which such high 12CO/13CO J=2–1 and 3–2 ratios are found outside a galactic nucleus.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects
    Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Porto Alegre 2017 Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Dissertação elaborada sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Eduardo Luis Damiani Bica, co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Charles José Bon- ato e apresentada ao Instituto de Física da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul em preenchimento do requisito par- cial para obtenção do título de Mestre em Física. Porto Alegre 2017 Acknowledgements To my parents, who supported me and made this possible, in a time and place where being in a university was just a distant dream. To my dearest friends Elisabeth, Robert, Augusto, and Natália - who so many times helped me go from "I give up" to "I’ll try once more". To my cats Kira, Fen, and Demi - who lazily join me in bed at the end of the day, and make everything worthwhile. "But, first of all, it will be necessary to explain what is our idea of a cluster of stars, and by what means we have obtained it. For an instance, I shall take the phenomenon which presents itself in many clusters: It is that of a number of lucid spots, of equal lustre, scattered over a circular space, in such a manner as to appear gradually more compressed towards the middle; and which compression, in the clusters to which I allude, is generally carried so far, as, by imperceptible degrees, to end in a luminous center, of a resolvable blaze of light." William Herschel, 1789 Abstract We provide a sample of 170 Galactic Globular Clusters (GCs) and analyse its spatial distribution properties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saga of M81: Global View of a Massive Stellar Halo in Formation
    Draft version October 27, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The Saga of M81: Global View of a Massive Stellar Halo in Formation Adam Smercina ,1, 2 Eric F. Bell ,1 Paul A. Price,3 Colin T. Slater ,2 Richard D'Souza,1, 4 Jeremy Bailin ,5 Roelof S. de Jong ,6 In Sung Jang ,6 Antonela Monachesi ,7, 8 and David Nidever 9, 10 1Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 2Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195-1580, USA 3Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 4Vatican Observatory, Specola Vaticana, V-00120, Vatican City State 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324, USA 6Leibniz-Institut f¨urAstrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany 7Instituto de Investigaci´onMultidisciplinar en Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa,Universidad de La Serena, Ra´ulBitr´an1305, La Serena, Chile 8Departamento de F´ısica y Astronom´ıa,Universidad de La Serena, Av. Juan Cisternas 1200 N, La Serena, Chile 9Department of Physics, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173840, Bozeman, MT 59717-3840 10National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719 (Received 31 October, 2019; Revised 31 August, 2020; Accepted 23 October, 2020) Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT Recent work has shown that Milky Way-mass galaxies display an incredible range of stellar halo properties, yet the origin of this diversity is unclear. The nearby galaxy M81 | currently interacting with M82 and NGC 3077 | sheds unique light on this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Hunt Challenge 2020
    Virtual Ghost Hunt Challenge 10/21 /2020 (Sorry we can meet in person this year or give out awards but try doing this challenge on your own.) Participant’s Name _________________________ Categories for the competition: Manual Telescope Electronically Aided Telescope Binocular Astrophotography (best photo) (if you expect to compete in more than one category please fill-out a sheet for each) ** There are four objects on this list that may be beyond the reach of beginning astronomers or basic telescopes. Therefore, we have marked these objects with an * and provided alternate replacements for you just below the designated entry. We will use the primary objects to break a tie if that’s needed. Page 1 TAS Ghost Hunt Challenge - Page 2 Time # Designation Type Con. RA Dec. Mag. Size Common Name Observed Facing West – 7:30 8:30 p.m. 1 M17 EN Sgr 18h21’ -16˚11’ 6.0 40’x30’ Omega Nebula 2 M16 EN Ser 18h19’ -13˚47 6.0 17’ by 14’ Ghost Puppet Nebula 3 M10 GC Oph 16h58’ -04˚08’ 6.6 20’ 4 M12 GC Oph 16h48’ -01˚59’ 6.7 16’ 5 M51 Gal CVn 13h30’ 47h05’’ 8.0 13.8’x11.8’ Whirlpool Facing West - 8:30 – 9:00 p.m. 6 M101 GAL UMa 14h03’ 54˚15’ 7.9 24x22.9’ 7 NGC 6572 PN Oph 18h12’ 06˚51’ 7.3 16”x13” Emerald Eye 8 NGC 6426 GC Oph 17h46’ 03˚10’ 11.0 4.2’ 9 NGC 6633 OC Oph 18h28’ 06˚31’ 4.6 20’ Tweedledum 10 IC 4756 OC Ser 18h40’ 05˚28” 4.6 39’ Tweedledee 11 M26 OC Sct 18h46’ -09˚22’ 8.0 7.0’ 12 NGC 6712 GC Sct 18h54’ -08˚41’ 8.1 9.8’ 13 M13 GC Her 16h42’ 36˚25’ 5.8 20’ Great Hercules Cluster 14 NGC 6709 OC Aql 18h52’ 10˚21’ 6.7 14’ Flying Unicorn 15 M71 GC Sge 19h55’ 18˚50’ 8.2 7’ 16 M27 PN Vul 20h00’ 22˚43’ 7.3 8’x6’ Dumbbell Nebula 17 M56 GC Lyr 19h17’ 30˚13 8.3 9’ 18 M57 PN Lyr 18h54’ 33˚03’ 8.8 1.4’x1.1’ Ring Nebula 19 M92 GC Her 17h18’ 43˚07’ 6.44 14’ 20 M72 GC Aqr 20h54’ -12˚32’ 9.2 6’ Facing West - 9 – 10 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Link Between the Formation Rates of Clusters and Stars In
    The Link Between the Formation Rates of Clusters and Stars in Galaxies Rupali Chandar,1 S. Michael Fall,2 and Bradley C. Whitmore2 ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to test whether the formation rate of star clusters is proportional to the star formation rate (SFR) in galaxies. As a first step, we present the mass functions of compact clusters younger than 10 Myr in seven star-forming galaxies of diverse masses, sizes, and morphologies: the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, NGC 4214, NGC 4449, M83, M51, and the Anten- nae. These cluster mass functions (CMFs) are well represented by power laws, dN/dM ∝ M β, with similar exponents β = −1.92 ± 0.27, but with amplitudes that differ by factors up to ∼103, corresponding to vast differences in the sizes of the cluster populations in these galaxies. We then normalize these CMFs by the SFRs in the galaxies, derived from dust-corrected Hα luminosities, and find that the spread in the amplitudes collapses, with a remaining rms deviation of only σ(log A)=0.2. This is close to the expected dispersion from random uncertain- ties in the CMFs and SFRs. Thus, the data presented here are consistent with exact proportionality between the formation rates of stars and clusters. However, the data also permit weak deviations from proportionality, at the factor of two level, within the statistical uncertainties. We find the same spread in amplitudes when we normalize the mass functions of much older clusters, with ages in the range 100 to 400 Myr, by the current SFR.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 2008 Index
    Astronomy Magazine Article Title Index 10 rising stars of astronomy, 8:60–8:63 1.5 million galaxies revealed, 3:41–3:43 185 million years before the dinosaurs’ demise, did an asteroid nearly end life on Earth?, 4:34–4:39 A Aligned aurorae, 8:27 All about the Veil Nebula, 6:56–6:61 Amateur astronomy’s greatest generation, 8:68–8:71 Amateurs see fireballs from U.S. satellite kill, 7:24 Another Earth, 6:13 Another super-Earth discovered, 9:21 Antares gang, The, 7:18 Antimatter traced, 5:23 Are big-planet systems uncommon?, 10:23 Are super-sized Earths the new frontier?, 11:26–11:31 Are these space rocks from Mercury?, 11:32–11:37 Are we done yet?, 4:14 Are we looking for life in the right places?, 7:28–7:33 Ask the aliens, 3:12 Asteroid sleuths find the dino killer, 1:20 Astro-humiliation, 10:14 Astroimaging over ancient Greece, 12:64–12:69 Astronaut rescue rocket revs up, 11:22 Astronomers spy a giant particle accelerator in the sky, 5:21 Astronomers unearth a star’s death secrets, 10:18 Astronomers witness alien star flip-out, 6:27 Astronomy magazine’s first 35 years, 8:supplement Astronomy’s guide to Go-to telescopes, 10:supplement Auroral storm trigger confirmed, 11:18 B Backstage at Astronomy, 8:76–8:82 Basking in the Sun, 5:16 Biggest planet’s 5 deepest mysteries, The, 1:38–1:43 Binary pulsar test affirms relativity, 10:21 Binocular Telescope snaps first image, 6:21 Black hole sets a record, 2:20 Black holes wind up galaxy arms, 9:19 Brightest starburst galaxy discovered, 12:23 C Calling all space probes, 10:64–10:65 Calling on Cassiopeia, 11:76 Canada to launch new asteroid hunter, 11:19 Canada’s handy robot, 1:24 Cannibal next door, The, 3:38 Capture images of our local star, 4:66–4:67 Cassini confirms Titan lakes, 12:27 Cassini scopes Saturn’s two-toned moon, 1:25 Cassini “tastes” Enceladus’ plumes, 7:26 Cepheus’ fall delights, 10:85 Choose the dome that’s right for you, 5:70–5:71 Clearing the air about seeing vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 108: 8-34, 1996 January
    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 108: 8-34, 1996 January Invited Review Paper Astrophysics in 1995 Virginia Trimble Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-2421 and Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, California 92717-4575 Peter J. T. Leonard Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-2421 Received 1995 October 26; accepted 1995 October 27 ABSTRACT. Ap95 differs from Ap91 to Ap94 primarily in Ap number. That is, it once again attempts to highlight some areas of our mutual science where a major event has occurred during the year (a possible solution of the Type II supernova problem, the faintness of quasar host galaxies, the collision of Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter), but also to focus on some topics where dogged determination is producing more gradual advances (dense star clusters, the second-parameter problem, inventories of nearby objects, and dark-matter candidates). In moderate departure from the rules of Ap92-94, there has been some deliberate up-dating of topics discussed previously. The topics are only partly ordered from nearby to far away. 1. INTRODUCTION Journal. Another, less publicized, change of editors has "For crying out loud," we can hear you saying, "is it modified the journal so much that Vinod Krishan's Bulletin them again!" Well, yes. This is the fifth annual mustering of of the Astronomical Society of India (BASI in the references) the sheep and goats of astronomical/astrophysical research, has been added to the list of journals to be scanned regularly. based on journals that reached library shelves between 1 Oc- Last year, we worried a bit about paying too much atten- tober 1994 and 30 September 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Astroph0807.3345 Ful
    Draft version July 22, 2008 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 08/13/06 THE INVISIBLES: A DETECTION ALGORITHM TO TRACE THE FAINTEST MILKY WAY SATELLITES S. M. Walsh1, B. Willman2, H. Jerjen1 Draft version July 22, 2008 ABSTRACT A specialized data mining algorithm has been developed using wide-field photometry catalogues, en- abling systematic and efficient searches for resolved, extremely low surface brightness satellite galaxies in the halo of the Milky Way (MW). Tested and calibrated with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6 (SDSS-DR6) we recover all fifteen MW satellites recently detected in SDSS, six known MW/Local Group dSphs in the SDSS footprint, and 19 previously known globular and open clusters. In addition, 30 point source overdensities have been found that correspond to no cataloged objects. The detection efficiencies of the algorithm have been carefully quantified by simulating more than three million model satellites embedded in star fields typical of those observed in SDSS, covering a wide range of parameters including galaxy distance, scale-length, luminosity, and Galactic latitude. We present several parameterizations of these detection limits to facilitate comparison between the observed Milky Way satellite population and predictions. We find that all known satellites would be detected with > 90% efficiency over all latitudes spanned by DR6 and that the MW satellite census within DR6 is complete to a magnitude limit of MV ≈−6.5 and a distance of 300 kpc. Assuming all existing MW satellites contain an appreciable old stellar population and have sizes and luminosities comparable to currently known companions, we predict a lower limit total of 52 Milky Way dwarf satellites within ∼ 260 kpc if they are uniformly distributed across the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Milky Way; Not Just a Delicious Candy Anymore…
    Chapter 11: Milky Way; Not Just a Delicious Candy Anymore… See that band of light stretching across this 360o panoramic image? That’s us. Key Points: 1. Our Sun is a part of the Milky Way galaxy. 2. Our Sun is just one of approximately 325 Billion stars that make the Milky Way galaxy (MW). 3. Every one of those 325 Billion stars orbit around the center of the MW. 4. MW is about 100,000 light years wide; we are about 35,000 ly from the center. 5. There is a supermassive BH at the center of the MW; about 4 Million Mo. 6. It wasn’t till 1925 that we realized the Universe was more than our MW! Chapter 11 P a g e | 1 So, did you ever look up on a clear dark night and see a long streak of fuzzy cloudy looking stuff that stretched all the way from horizon to horizon? That is our MW galaxy. Seen from here on Earth, we are looking into the dense central disc of the MW. First, what the heck is a “galaxy” anyway? Galaxies in General These are simply large groups of stars that have all been formed at the same time and are held together by their mutual gravity. One of the current unsolved mysteries in cosmology is just how galaxies formed. Yes, we have two basic theories on the origin of galaxies. Here’s the main theory: Start with a hugely huge gas cloud of almost all hydrogen and helium similar to the one that started our own little solar system without the heavy elements, but really REALLY REALLY huge; a Million light years wide perhaps! This gas cloud clumps together to form many stars that are then all attracted to each other via gravity.
    [Show full text]