Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time Mark R. Krumholz1;2, Christopher F. McKee3, and Joss Bland-Hawthorn2;4;5 1Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia; email: [email protected] 2Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in Three Dimensions (ASTRO-3D), Australia 3Departments of Astronomy and of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics A28, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 5Miller Professor, Miller Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA arXiv:1812.01615v2 [astro-ph.GA] 13 Dec 2018 1 Xxxx. Xxx. Xxx. Xxx. 2019. 59:1{76 Keywords This article's doi: star clusters, star formation, globular clusters, open clusters and 10.1146/((please add article doi)) associations, stellar abundances Copyright c 2019 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Abstract Star clusters stand at the intersection of much of modern astrophysics: the interstellar medium, gravitational dynamics, stellar evolution, and cosmology. Here we review observations and theoretical models for the formation, evolution, and eventual disruption of star clusters. Current literature suggests a picture of this life cycle with several phases: • Clusters form in hierarchically-structured, accreting molecular clouds that convert gas into stars at a low rate per dynamical time until feedback disperses the gas. • The densest parts of the hierarchy resist gas removal long enough to reach high star formation efficiency, becoming dynamically- relaxed and well-mixed. These remain bound after gas removal. • In the first ∼ 100 Myr after gas removal, clusters disperse mod- erately fast, through a combination of mass loss and tidal shocks by dense molecular structures in the star-forming environment. • After ∼ 100 Myr, clusters lose mass via two-body relaxation and shocks by giant molecular clouds, processes that preferentially affect low-mass clusters and cause a turnover in the cluster mass function to appear on ∼ 1 − 10 Gyr timescales. • Even after dispersal, some clusters remain coherent and thus de- tectable in chemical or action space for multiple galactic orbits. In the next decade a new generation of space- and AO-assisted ground-based telescopes will enable us to test and refine this picture. 2 Krumholz, McKee, & Bland-Hawthorn Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................3 1.1. Historical background and motivation ..................................................................3 1.2. Prelude: what is a star cluster?.........................................................................5 2. DEMOGRAPHICS: OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ...................................................7 2.1. Methods.................................................................................................7 2.2. Mass distribution ........................................................................................ 11 2.3. Age distribution ......................................................................................... 13 2.4. Bound mass fraction .................................................................................... 15 2.5. Size and density ......................................................................................... 18 2.6. Elemental abundances .................................................................................. 20 2.7. The limits of demography at young ages ............................................................... 21 3. BIRTH........................................................................................................ 22 3.1. Initial conditions for star cluster formation ............................................................. 22 3.2. Conversion of gas to stars .............................................................................. 26 3.3. Feedback and the termination of star formation ....................................................... 31 3.4. Star formation histories and timescales ................................................................. 37 3.5. Emergence of the gas-free cluster population .......................................................... 42 3.6. Elemental abundance distributions ..................................................................... 46 4. LIFE AND DEATH........................................................................................... 47 4.1. Star cluster structure and tides ......................................................................... 47 4.2. Internal evolutionary processes.......................................................................... 49 4.3. External and environmental processes .................................................................. 52 4.4. Models of the full cluster population ................................................................... 55 5. AFTERLIFE .................................................................................................. 58 5.1. Kinematics .............................................................................................. 59 5.2. Action-angle space ...................................................................................... 59 5.3. Chemical tagging ........................................................................................ 61 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS ............................................................. 62 1. INTRODUCTION The galaxy is in fact nothing but a congeries of innumerable stars grouped together in clusters. Siderius Nuncius (Sidereal Messenger), Galileo Galilei, 1610 1.1. Historical background and motivation After four centuries since Galileo's first observations, star clusters remain mysterious. What are the uni- fying principles that govern the formation of globular and open clusters, groups, associations and super- associations? As illustrated in Figure 11, clusters cover a huge range of mass, size, and density scales. The 2 6 clusters shown span ages from ∼ 1 Myr to > 10 Gyr, and masses from ∼ 10 − 10 M . Some are so 1The source code and data tabulations used to produce all the figures in this review are available at https: //bitbucket.org/krumholz/cluster_review/, and also are provided as Supplementary Materials. We make use of the following software packages: scipy (Oliphant 2007; Millman & Aivazis 2011), matplotlib (Hunter 2007), astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013), and SLUG (da Silva, Fumagalli & Krumholz 2012; Krumholz et al. 2015b). www.annualreviews.org Star clusters 3 • ONC, T < 3 Myr Arches, T 2 3 Myr NGC 265, T 250 Myr Hyades, T 625 Myr ≈ − ≈ ≈ 0.68 pc 0.40 pc 0.29 pc 0.41 pc 0.1◦ 1000 100 0.5◦ Coll 261, T 7 Gyr NGC 6535, T > 10 Gyr 47 Tuc, T > 10 Gyr NGC 1252: Fake News ≈ 0.39 pc 0.32 pc 0.43 pc 0.38 pc 3000 1000 2000 20 Figure 1 Images of a range of star clusters, along with NGC 1252, an object previously classified as a cluster but now known to be an asterism. The field of view in all frames is 3 pc 3 pc, and North is up; angular sizes are indicated by × scale bars. Image sources are: Orion Nebular Cluster (ONC) { Robberto et al.(2013); Arches cluster { NASA & ESA; NGC 265 { NASA & ESA; Davide De Martin (ESA/Hubble) and Edward W. Olszewski (University of Arizona, USA); Hyades { NASA, ESA, & STScI; Collinder 261 { ESO/Digitized Sky Survey; NGC 6535 { ESA/Hubble & NASA, Gilles Chapdelaine; 47 Tuc { NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)-ESA/Hubble Collaboration; J. Mack (STScI) and G. Piotto (University of Padova, Italy); NGC 1252 { WEBDA database, https://www.univie.ac.at/webda/. compact and rich that stars become lost in confusion in the 3 pc-frames shown, others are so sparse and extended that most cluster members are outside the frame. Some are classified as open clusters (Arches, NGC 265, Hyades, Coll 261), some as globular clusters (NGC 6535, 47 Tuc). The Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC) is still forming and, depending on the author, might not even be classified as a cluster at all. NGC 1252 had been classified as an open cluster since 1888, but in 2018 was shown to be merely an asterism (Kos et al. 2018b). Cluster formation is central to the star formation process. Conceivably, all stars formed in groups, clusters, or hierarchies, although, for this to be true, most clusters must have dissolved into the Galactic background soon after formation. However, our understanding of when, how, and why stars cluster remains primitive (see reviews by Krumholz et al. 2014, Renaud 2018, and Adamo & Bastian 2018). A review of clusters is timely for several reasons. One is the emerging overlap between the traditionally separate communities focused on globular clusters and modern-day star clusters and star formation. These have been separate in the past because star clusters in the disk of the Milky Way, generally classified as open clusters (OCs), and those in the halo, generally classified as globular clusters (GCs), appear to occupy distinct loci in the parameter space of mass, age, and metallicity. New data have begun to blur this distinction: even in the Milky Way there is substantial overlap in both metallicity and density between OCs 4 Krumholz, McKee, & Bland-Hawthorn and GCs, and in rapidly star-forming local galaxies such as the Antennae (Zhang & Fall 1999) and M82 Surveys referenced (McCrady & Graham 2007) there is overlap in mass as well. While there is still a bimodality in the star in this review: cluster age and spatial distribution, this may simply reflect the combined