DOCSLIB.ORG

Iec Report Format V2.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iec Report Format V2.1 IEc ECONOMIC ANALYSES OF ENDANGERED SPECIES REGULATIONS BY U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE REGION Region 1 Gulf sturgeon (NOAA & USFWS) Bull trout (Columbia, Klamath River, St. Flatwoods salamander Mary-Belly River, Coastal Puget Florida beach mice (3) Sound, & Jarbridge populations) Florida butterflies (2) Cook's lomatium & Woolly Florida manatee meadowfoam Florida mussels (7) Klamath suckers Georgia pigtoe mussel, Interrupted Lost River and Shortnose Suckers rocksnail & Rough hornsnail Marbled murrelet Golden sedge Northern spotted owl Gulf Coast mussels (8) Oregon chub Kentucky gladecress Oregon spotted frog Louisiana black bear Puget Trough species (3) Mississippi gopher frog Rockfish Mobile River Basin mussels (11) Selkirk Mountain caribou Piping plover (North Carolina Slickspot peppergrass wintering population) Wenatchee Mts. checkermallow Red knot White sturgeon (Kootenai River Southeast fishes (5) population) Southeastern plants (3) Willamette species (3) Spring pygmy sunfish Woodland caribou Spruce-Fir Moss spider Region 2 Region 5 Arizona plants (3) Atlantic Salmon Region 8 continued Hawaii Big Island Species (3) Arizona springsnails (2) Diamond darter Hidden Lake bluecurls Blackburn's sphinx moth Arkansas River shiner Loggerhead sea turtles (FWS & NOAA) Keck's checkermallow Hawaii Damselflies (4) Bexar County invertebrates (9) Kneeland Prairie pennycress Brazos River fish (2) La Graciosa thistle Hawaii picture-wing flies (11) Region 6 Cactus ferruginous pygmy owl Laguna Mountains skipper Hawai'i plants (47) Canada lynx Chiricahua Leopard frog Lane Mountain milk-vetch Kaua'i cave amphipod and Kaua'i cave Colorado butterfly plant Chupadera springsnail Lyon's pentachaeta wolf spider Colorado plants (3) Comal Springs invertebrates (3) Mexican flannelbush Kaua'i & Ni'ihau plants (83) Desert Yellowhead Devils River minnow Monterey spineflower Lana'i plants (32) Gunnison sage grouse Gila chub Morro shoulderband snail Mau'i & Kaho'olawe plants (61) Holmgren & Shivwits milk-vetches Jaguar Mountain yellow-legged frog Maui Nui species (136) New Mexico jumping mouse Jemez mountain salamander Munz's onion Moloka'i plants (46) Piping plover (Great Plains population) Mexican spotted owl Nevin's barberry Monk Seal Preble's meadow jumping mouse Mexican wolf Otay tarplant Newcomb's snail Salt Creek tiger beetle Pecos sunflower Pebble plains plants Northwestern Hawaiian Islands plants (5) Topeka shiner Piping plover (wintering Texas pop.) Peirson's milk-vetch O'ahu plants (99) Rio Grande silvery minnow Peninsular bighorn sheep Region 7, Alaska Guam & Northern Mariana Islands Southwestern invertebrates (4) Purple amole Guam species (6) Southwestern willow flycatcher Northern sea otter Quino checkerspot butterfly Rota bridled white-eye Spikedace and loach minnow Polar bear Riverside fairy shrimp Texas plants (2) Spectacled eider Robust spineflower Puerto Rico and US Virgin Islands Texas salamanders (4) Steller's eider San Bernardino kangaroo rat Catesbaea melanocarpa West Texas invertebrates San Diego ambrosia Guajon Yellow-billed cuckoo Region 8 San Diego fairy shrimp Zapata bladderpod Alameda whipsnake San Diego thornmint Marine Species Arroyo toad Zuni bluehead sucker San Jacinto Valley crownscale Atlantic Salmon (NOAA) Baker's and yellow larkspurs Santa Ana sucker Eulachon (NOAA) Bay checkerspot butterfly Region 3 Santa Cruz tarplant False killer whales (NOAA) Bi-State DPS greater sage grouse Scotts Valley polygonum Hine's emerald dragonfly Fin whale (NOAA) Big Bear Valley sandwort Scotts Valley spineflower Grotto sculpin Green sturgeon (NOAA) Braunton's milk-vetch Sierra amphibians (3) Piping plover (breeding population) Humpback whale (NOAA) Brodiaea filifolia Tumbling Creek cavesnail Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep Killer whale (NOAA) Buena Vista Lake shrew Sierra plants (2) North Atlantic right whale (NOAA) California coastal plants (3) Spreading navarretia Pacific salmon and steelhead (NOAA) Region 4 California gnatcatcher Suisun thistle & soft bird's-beak Alabama beach mouse California red-legged frog Thread-leaved brodiaea Canada Alabama sturgeon California taraxacum and San Tidewater goby Lake Sturgeon (Oceans/Fisheries Canada) Altamaha spinymussel Bernardino bluegrass Vail Lake ceanothus Appalachian elktoe California tiger salamander (Central, Ventura marsh milk-vetch Arkansas mussels (2) Species are listed under the lead Region, and habitat may Santa Barbara, and Sonoma Vernal pool species (15) include other areas outside of that region. In many cases, Braun's rockcress populations) Western snowy plover critical habitat designations were remanded voluntarily by Black warrior waterdog the Service in response to litigation or under court-order, Carbonate plants (5) Willowy monardella Cape Sable seaside sparrow requiring two or more rule packages and supporting Casey's june beetle Yadon's piperia Carolina heelsplitter economic analyses for single species. In such cases, the Coachella Valley milk-vetch Zayante band-winged grasshopper Caribbean plants (3) species is listed here only once. Fish Slough milk-vetch Cumberlandian mussels (5) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Division of Law Enforcement
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Division of Law Enforcement Annual Report FY 2000 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, working with others, conserves, protects, and enhances fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. As part of this mission, the Service is responsible for enforcing U.S. and international laws, regulations, and treaties that protect wildlife resources. Cover photo by J & K Hollingsworth/USFWS I. Overview ..................................................................................................................1 Program Evolution and Priorities......................................................................2 Major Program Components ..............................................................................2 FY 2000 Investigations Statistical Summary (chart) ....................................3 FY 1999-2000 Wildlife Inspection Activity (chart) ..........................................6 Table of Laws Enforced ......................................................................................................7 Contents II. Organizational Structure ........................................................................................9 III. Regional Highlights ..............................................................................................14 Region One ..........................................................................................................14 Region Two ..........................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Fws–R4–Es–2014–N167; Fxes11130400000c2–145–Ff04e00000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/06/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-26362, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4310–55 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R4–ES–2014–N167; FXES11130400000C2–145–FF04E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Recovery Plan for Georgia Pigtoe Mussel, Interrupted Rocksnail, and Rough Hornsnail AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the availability of the final recovery plan for the endangered Georgia pigtoe mussel, interrupted rocksnail, and rough hornsnail. The final recovery plan includes specific recovery objectives and criteria the interrupted rocksnail and rough hornsnail would have to meet in order for us to downlist them to threatened status under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Recovery criteria for the Georgia pigtoe will be developed after we complete critical recovery actions and gain a greater understanding of the species. ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the recovery plan by contacting Jeff Powell at the Alabama Field Office, by U.S. mail at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alabama Field Office, 1208–B Main Street, Daphne, AL 36526, or by telephone at (251) 441–5858; or by visiting our recovery plan website at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Powell (see ADDRESSES above). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction We listed the Georgia pigtoe mussel (Pleurobema hanleyianum), interrupted rocksnail (Leptoxis foremani), and rough hornsnail (Pleurocera foremani) as endangered species under the Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Federal Register, 75 FR 6613; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 6613 This document does not contain the Commission’s Secretary, Office of availability of the draft economic proposed information collection the Secretary, Federal Communications analysis for the proposed designation of requirements subject to the Paperwork Commission. critical habitat for 3 mollusks, Georgia Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– • The Commission’s contractor will pigtoe mussel (Pleurobema 13. In addition, therefore, it does not receive hand–delivered or messenger– hanleyianum), interrupted rocksnail contain any proposed information delivered paper filings for the (Leptoxis foremani), and rough collection burden ’’for small business Commission’s Secretary at 236 hornsnail (Pleurocera foremani), under concerns with fewer than 25 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, Suite 110, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours amended (Act). We also announce the Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. availability of a draft economic analysis Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. All hand deliveries must be held (DEA) and an amended required 3506(c)(4). together with rubber bands or fasteners. determinations section of the proposal. Provisions of the Regulatory Any envelope must be disposed of We are reopening the comment period Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply before entering the building. for an additional 30 days to allow all to this proceeding. • Commercial overnight mail (other interested parties an opportunity to Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 than U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Permitting Update in Potential Rough Hornsnail Habitat
    Permitting Update in Potential Rough Hornsnail Habitat on Lake Mitchell & Lay Lake The rough hornsnail (Pleurocera foremani) What does this mean? The sensitive area (RHS) is a species of snail that is federally of Lay Lake has not changed. However, listed under the Endangered Species Act additional shoreline on Lake Mitchell has been (ESA). It was identified by federal authorities designated as sensitive and subject to the during the relicensing of the Coosa River measures that are protective of the RHS. If it Hydroelectric Project and is located along is determined that the proposed activity could certain stretches of the Coosa River and impact the RHS or its habitat, the applicant its tributaries. Specifically, the species is will be required to conduct a survey & found in the upper reaches of Lay Lake and relocation of the RHS by a qualified contractor significant portions of Lake Mitchell. In 2016, prior to beginning any project work. Alabama Power Company (APC) and the U. Applicants can expect a lengthier process for S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) came permit approval and additional expense for to an agreement on measures that must be the survey and relocation. No permits will taken to protect the snail. These measures be issued by APC’s Shoreline Management apply to certain lakeshore activities such in sensitive areas on Lake Mitchell or Lay as dredging; construction of sea walls; Lake for activities potentially impacting the installation of rip rap; and construction RHS without the appropriate review and and maintenance of piers, boathouses, and USACE authorization. If the applicant decides boat ramps where they pose a risk to the to proceed without a permit, the shoreline snail and/or its habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING PERMITS Valid: One Year from Date of Issuance Resident - Nonresident
    SCP – Page 1 SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING PERMITS Valid: one year from date of issuance Resident - Nonresident Alabama Game, Fish and Wildlife Law; Article 12; beginning with 9-11-231 PRIVILEGE: • An INDIVIDUAL, EDUCATIONAL OR AGENCY SCP authorizes permit holder to collect any wild invertebrate or vertebrate species or their eggs in this state for propagation or scientific purposes. • A FEDERAL / STATE PROTECTED SCP authorizes permit holder to collect endangered / protected species (copy of USFWS permit must be submitted if required by federal law). PERMITS TYPES: • INDIVIDUAL SCP: for an individual collector. • EDUCATIONAL SCP: for a professor/teacher and their current students. • AGENCY MEMBER SCP: for an agency and their current members. • FEDERAL / STATE PROTECTED SCP: Issued in addition to an Individual, Educational or Agency SCP. STUDENTS / AGENCY MEMBERS: • Each student / agency member must complete the Educational & Agency SCP Dependent Information Form and be approved to work under an Educational or Agency SCP. (See The SCP section online at https://www.outdooralabama.com/licenses/commercial-licenses-permits) COLLECTIONS: • A SCP Collection Data Form must be completed and faxed for approval prior to any scheduled collection. (See The SCP section online at https://www.outdooralabama.com/licenses/commercial-licenses-permits) • Annual reports required. Must be submitted prior to renewal requests. RESTRICTIONS: • Must have a SCP to obtain a Federal / State Protected Species permit. • Federal / State Protected permit must meet strict guidelines prior to issuance. • No species collected are to be sold. NOTE: • Electronic system processes all applications and reports. • For areas under Marine Resources jurisdiction, call (251) 861-2882. • Applicant should allow 3 weeks for processing and issuance.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Business Owners from Widely Varied Industries
    No. 17-71 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, ET AL., Respondents. ________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ________________ BRIEF OF SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS ________________ Kevin J. Lynch J. Carl Cecere UNIVERSITY OF DENVER Counsel of Record STURM COLLEGE OF LAW CECERE PC ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 6035 McCommas Blvd. CLINIC Dallas, TX 75206 2255 E. Evans Ave. (469) 600-9455 Denver, CO 80208 [email protected] (303) 871-6039 Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................. i Table of Authorities ............................................................. ii Interest of Amici Curiae ..................................................... 1 Introduction and Summary of the Argument .................. 1 Argument ............................................................................. 4 I. Protecting endangered species provides signif- icant economic benefits to small businesses. ............ 4 A. ESA regulations provide small-business opportunities. ....................................................... 4 B. The Service’s experts are an economic asset for many small-businesses. ..................... 16 C. Protection of biodiversity is also essential for the economy as a whole. .............................. 19 II. The Service’s broad, flexible authority to designate
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofauna Communities and Habitat Conditions in Temporary Wetlands of Upland and Floodplain Forests on Public Lands in North-Central Mississippi
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2007 Herpetofauna Communities and Habitat Conditions in Temporary Wetlands of Upland and Floodplain Forests on Public Lands in North-Central Mississippi Katherine E. Edwards Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Edwards, Katherine E., "Herpetofauna Communities and Habitat Conditions in Temporary Wetlands of Upland and Floodplain Forests on Public Lands in North-Central Mississippi" (2007). Theses and Dissertations. 2484. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/2484 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HERPETOFAUNA COMMUNITIES AND HABITAT CONDITIONS IN TEMPORARY WETLANDS OF UPLAND AND FLOODPLAIN FORESTS ON PUBLIC LANDS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI By Katherine Elise Edwards A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Science in the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2007 HERPETOFAUNA COMMUNITIES AND HABITAT CONDITIONS IN TEMPORARY WETLANDS OF UPLAND AND FLOODPLAIN FORESTS ON PUBLIC LANDS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI By Katherine Elise Edwards Approved: Jeanne C. Jones Kristina C. Godwin Associate Professor of Wildlife and State Director, USDA APHIS Fisheries Wildlife Services (Director of Thesis) Adjunct Faculty of Wildlife and Fisheries (Committee Member) W. Daryl Jones Bruce D. Leopold Assistant Extension Professor of Professor and Head Wildlife and Fisheries Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (Committee Member) (Committee Member) Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Freshwater Gastropods of Canada and the United States Paul D
    This article was downloaded by: [69.144.7.122] On: 24 July 2013, At: 12:35 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Fisheries Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufsh20 Conservation Status of Freshwater Gastropods of Canada and the United States Paul D. Johnson a , Arthur E. Bogan b , Kenneth M. Brown c , Noel M. Burkhead d , James R. Cordeiro e o , Jeffrey T. Garner f , Paul D. Hartfield g , Dwayne A. W. Lepitzki h , Gerry L. Mackie i , Eva Pip j , Thomas A. Tarpley k , Jeremy S. Tiemann l , Nathan V. Whelan m & Ellen E. Strong n a Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (ADCNR) , 2200 Highway 175, Marion , AL , 36756-5769 E-mail: b North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences , Raleigh , NC c Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge , LA d United States Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center , Gainesville , FL e University of Massachusetts at Boston , Boston , Massachusetts f Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , Florence , AL g U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , Jackson , MS h Wildlife Systems Research , Banff , Alberta , Canada i University of Guelph, Water Systems Analysts , Guelph , Ontario , Canada j University of Winnipeg , Winnipeg , Manitoba , Canada k Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , Marion , AL l Illinois Natural History Survey , Champaign , IL m University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL n Smithsonian Institution, Department of Invertebrate Zoology , Washington , DC o Nature-Serve , Boston , MA Published online: 14 Jun 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 112:9-16
    This authors' personal copy may not be publicly or systematically copied or distributed, or posted on the Open Web, except with written permission of the copyright holder(s). It may be distributed to interested individuals on request. Vol. 112: 9–16, 2014 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published November 13 doi: 10.3354/dao02792 Dis Aquat Org High susceptibility of the endangered dusky gopher frog to ranavirus William B. Sutton1,2,*, Matthew J. Gray1, Rebecca H. Hardman1, Rebecca P. Wilkes3, Andrew J. Kouba4, Debra L. Miller1,3 1Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA 3Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee Center of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 4Memphis Zoo, Conservation and Research Department, Memphis, TN 38112, USA ABSTRACT: Amphibians are one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups, with pathogens playing a role in the decline of some species. Rare species are particularly vulnerable to extinction be - cause populations are often isolated and exist at low abundance. The potential impact of patho- gens on rare amphibian species has seldom been investigated. The dusky gopher frog Lithobates sevosus is one of the most endangered amphibian species in North America, with 100−200 indi- viduals remaining in the wild. Our goal was to determine whether adult L. sevosus were suscep- tible to ranavirus, a pathogen responsible for amphibian die-offs worldwide. We tested the rela- tive susceptibility of adult L. sevosus to ranavirus (103 plaque-forming units) isolated from a morbid bullfrog via 3 routes of exposure: intra-coelomic (IC) injection, oral (OR) inoculation, and water bath (WB) exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment and Recommended Disease Screening
    A Manual For Control of Infectious Diseases in Amphibian Survival Assurance Colonies and Reintroduction Programs Version 2.0: updated 2017 Based on: Proceedings from a Workshop: 16–18 February 2009 San Diego Zoo Cover photos courtesy of Allan Pessier and Ron Holt. A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group in collaboration with Amphibian Ark, San Diego Zoo, and Zoo Atlanta IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. © Copyright CBSG 2017 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Pessier, A.P. and J.R. Mendelson III (eds.). 2017. A Manual for Control of Infectious Diseases in Amphibian Survival Assurance Colonies and Reintroduction Programs, Ver. 2.0. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. An electronic version of this report can be downloaded at www.cbsg.org <http://www.cbsg.org/> . This project was supported by grant LG-25-08-0066 from the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Any views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Gopher Frog (Rana Capito Sevosa) Dusky Gopher Frog
    Originally listed as: Mississippi Gopher Frog (Rana capito sevosa) Formally now recognized by the USFWS (2012) as: Dusky Gopher Frog (Rana sevosa) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation (Photograph by John Tupy, Western Carolina University, used with permission) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office Jackson, Mississippi 5-YEAR REVIEW Dusky gopher frog (Rana sevosa) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review: In conducting this 5-year review, we relied on the best available information pertaining to historical and current distributions, life history, threats to, and habitats of this species. Our sources included the final rule listing this species under the Endangered Species Act (Act); peer reviewed scientific publications; unpublished field observations by Service, State and other experienced biologists; unpublished survey reports; and notes and communications from other qualified biologists or experts. We announced initiation of this review and requested information in a published Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period on July 6, 2009 (74 FR 31972). The completed draft review was sent to affected Service Field Offices and peer reviewers for their review. Comments were evaluated and incorporated where appropriate into this final document (see Appendix A). We received one public comment during the open comment period. No part of this review was contracted to an outside party. This review was completed by the Service’s lead Recovery biologist in the Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office, Jackson, Mississippi. B. Reviewers Lead Region – Southeast Region: Kelly Bibb, 404-679-7132 Lead Field Office – Jackson, Mississippi, Ecological Services Field Office: Linda LaClaire, 601-321-1126 Cooperating Field Office – Daphne, Alabama, Ecological Services Field Office: Matthias Laschet, 251-441-5842, Lafayette, Louisiana, Ecological Services Field Office: Deborah Fuller, 337-291-3124 C.
    [Show full text]