DOCSLIB.ORG

Server I/O Networks Past, Present, and Future Renato John Recio Chief Architect, IBM Eserver I/O IBM Systems Group, Austin, Texas [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Server I/O Networks Past, Present, and Future Renato John Recio Chief Architect, IBM Eserver I/O IBM Systems Group, Austin, Texas Recio@Us.Ibm.Com Server I/O Networks Past, Present, and Future Renato John Recio Chief Architect, IBM eServer I/O IBM Systems Group, Austin, Texas [email protected] Abstract • Low latency - the total time required to transfer the first bit of a message from the local application to the remote appli- Enterprise and technical customers place a diverse set of cation, including the transit times spent in intermediate requirements on server I/O networks. In the past, no single switches and I/O adapters. network type has been able to satisfy all of these requirements. As • High throughput - the number of small block transactions a result several fabric types evolved and several interconnects performed per second. The size and rate of small block I/O emerged to satisfy a subset of the requirements. Recently several depends on the workload and fabric type. A first level technologies have emerged that enable a single interconnect to be approximation of the I/O block size and I/O throughput rates required for various I/O workloads can be found in used as more than one fabric type. This paper will describe the “I/O Workload Characteristics of Modern Servers” [4]. requirements customers place on server I/O networks; the various • High bandwidth - the number of bytes per second sup- fabric types and interconnects that have been used to satisfy those ported by the network. Typically, used to gauge perfor- requirements; the technologies that are enabling network mance for large block data transfers. Peek bandwidth convergence; and how these new technologies are being deployed describes the bandwidth provided by a given link; whereas on various network families. Sustained bandwidth describes the actual bandwidths pro- vided after taking application, operating system, I/O adapter, and protocol inefficiencies into account. Again, a General Terms first level approximation of the bandwidth required for var- Design, Experimentation, Performance, Standardization. ious I/O workloads can be found in “I/O Workload Charac- teristics of Modern Servers” [4] and ASCI Purple Statement of Work [1]. Keywords • Host Overhead (a.k.a. efficiency, utilization) - a measure 10 GigE, Cluster, Cluster Networks, Gigabit Ethernet, of the number of cycles expended by the host CPU to per- InfiniBand, I/O Expansion Network, IOEN, iONIC, iSER, form an I/O operation. iSCSI, LAN, PCI, PCI Express, RDMA, RNIC, SAN, Socket • Memory Overhead (a.k.a. efficiency, utilization) - a mea- Extensions, and TOE. sure of the number of times data must be moved through host memory, before it reaches the final consumer of the 1. INTRODUCTION TO SERVER I/O data. NETWORKS • Connectivity related requirements Server I/O networks are used by servers to connect to I/O • Scalability - ability to interconnect from a small number to devices, clients, and other servers. Servers use a wide range of a large number of endpoints. interconnects to attach I/O, from traditional buses (e.g. PCI) to • Distance - ability to interconnect endpoints that span a more complex general purpose networks that incorporate serial wide range (from short to long). links, packet-routing, and switches. • Performance Density - ability to package a larger number of computing resources in a limited space, and is typically 3 2. SERVER I/O REQUIREMENTS measured in performance/ft (/watt). The requirements placed on Server I/O networks are derived • Self-management related requirements from server requirements and include the following: • Self-healing (unscheduled outage protection) - ability to remain available despite the presence of failures. Unsched- • Performance related requirements uled outages can be caused by transient (short duration) or permanent (long duration) faults. For transient faults, server I/O interconnects typically use a combination of data redundancy (e.g. cyclical redundancy checks) and sig- Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this nal quality inspection to detect the fault and use operation work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee retries to recover from the fault. If a fault cannot be recov- provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or ered through temporal recovery, it is typically considered a commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the permanent fault. Server I/O interconnects typically recover full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, or republish, from permanent faults through the use of redundant paths to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior and path switchover that reroute traffic through faultless specific permission and/or a fee. paths. SIGCOMM'03, August 25-29, 2003, Karlsruhe, Germany. • Self-configuring (scheduled outage protection) - ability to Copyright 2003 remain available during the addition, modification, or dele- tion of server I/O interconnects resources (e.g. links, ACM 1-58113-735-4/03/0008...$5.00. switches, bridges, and other endpoints). • Self-optimizing (Service Level Agreement, Quality of Ser- proliferated. Figure1 shows a typical large server topology vice) - ability to provide a sustained level of service and the various Server I/O Fabric Types. despite increases in fabric or resource utilization. For Figure 1.Server I/O Networks server I/O interconnects, several key self-optimizing requirements are: uP, $ uP, $ uP, $ uP, $ uP, $ uP, $ uP, $ uP, $ Memory Memory Cluster Area Memory Memory Fabric congestion management - static or dynamic Controller Network Controller mechanisms used to manage fabric utilization peaks. I/O Expansion I/O Expansion Network Storage Area Network I/O Network Bridge I/O Service differentiation management - mechanisms Attachment Switch Attachment I/O I/O Virtual used to match the performance levels associated with Virtual Virtual AdapterVirtual Virtual Adapter VirtualAdapter . Adapter. Adapter VirtualAdapter Local Area Virtual Adapter a given service to the performance levels provided by VirtualAdapter Virtual I/O Adapter Network Adapter I/O the end point and fabric. I/O I/O Server Packaging Envelope Router, Server Packaging Envelope Router, Gateway Router, • Self-protecting (a.k.a. secure) - ability to protect against Gateway Gateway unauthorized access. WAN/MAN Access Access Gateway Gateway • Cost related requirements User Access User Networks User Devices Devices • Infrastructure build-up cost - amount of infrastructure change required to support a given interconnect. Includes development effort (costs) and customer effort (e.g. new management tools). 3.1 Fabric Types I/O Expansion Networks (IOENs) - These networks are used • Standardization - interconnect protocols and interfaces to connect the host processor complex to I/O adapters through defined by a specification that is widely accepted and the use of switches and/or bridges. IOENs allow large servers adhered to within the industry. Allows procurement of to attach a large number of I/O adapters, typically through a products from several (to many) different vendors. switched fabric. However, on a small server (esp. a server blade) the IOEN is typically a direct point-to-point • Total Cost of Ownership - Hardware, software, and man- agement costs associated with a given I/O interconnect. interconnect between the memory controller and the I/O Standards interacts with volumes to lower TCO. Bridge/Switch. • Today, IOENs are proprietary and include: IBM’s Remote • Fabric consolidation - ability to solve the needs of more I/O (RIO) network used on pSeries and iSeries servers[25]; than one fabric type, which reduces total cost of ownership. IBM’s Self-Timed Interface used on zSeries servers[12]; For example, fabric consolidation reduces the number of HP’s Superdome I/O network[26]; HP’s ServerNet[13]; and software management products and skills used to manage Silicon Graphics’ XIO[23]. Some of these, for example the system. IBM’s RIO, are switched, link identifier based networks. • Virtualization related requirements I/O Attachment - If the I/O adapter supports the link used by the I/O Expansion Network, then it can be attached directly to • Host virtualization - a mechanism that allows a single the IOEN. If the I/O adapter does not support the link used by physical host to run multiple, independent operating sys- the IOEN, then it is attached through an IOEN bridge tem images (a.k.a. partitions) concurrently and provides access protection between the operating system images. • Today, server I/O adapters primarily attach through a standard I/O bus (PCI family) and are used to either connect • Interconnect virtualization - a mechanism that allows a sin- other fabric types or directly attach storage (e.g. disk, gle physical interconnect to be segmented into multiple, optical, tape) devices. Storage I/O devices today typically virtual interconnects and provides access protection use parallel SCSI (Small Computer Systems Interface), between the virtual interconnects. parallel ATA (Advanced Technology Attachment), or Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL). Though the industry is • I/O virtualization - a mechanism that enables physical I/O migrating the parallel links to serial (Serial Attached SCSI unit’s resources to be aggregated and managed in shared and Serial ATA). resource pools. Each shared resource pool is associated to one or more host. Only hosts that are associated with a Cluster Area Networks (CAN) support message-passing shared resource pool are allowed to access the shared communications between servers in a cluster. Cluster Area resource pool. Networks can be built from low-bandwidth, high-latency standard interconnects to high-bandwidth, low-latency proprietary interconnects. Examples of standard CAN 3. SERVER I/O FABRICS AND interconnects include: Ethernet and, more recently, InfiniBand. INTERCONNECTS Examples of proprietary CAN interconnects include: IBM’s SP fabric [15]; IBM’s InterSystem Channel; Myricom’s Myrinet; Server I/O network requirements conflict to some degree. Quadrics’ QsNet; HP’s ServerNet, and HP’s Hyperfabric [14]. Fully satisfying all the requirements with a single network has Storage Area Networks (SAN) connect servers to storage not been possible in the past, so several “Fabric Types” (on servers (a.k.a.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OES 2 SP3: Novell CIFS for Linux Administration Guide 9.2.1 Mapping Drives from a Windows 2000 Or XP Client
    www.novell.com/documentation Novell CIFS Administration Guide Open Enterprise Server 2 SP3 May 03, 2013 Legal Notices Novell, Inc., makes no representations or warranties with respect to the contents or use of this documentation, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc., reserves the right to revise this publication and to make changes to its content, at any time, without obligation to notify any person or entity of such revisions or changes. Further, Novell, Inc., makes no representations or warranties with respect to any software, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc., reserves the right to make changes to any and all parts of Novell software, at any time, without any obligation to notify any person or entity of such changes. Any products or technical information provided under this Agreement may be subject to U.S. export controls and the trade laws of other countries. You agree to comply with all export control regulations and to obtain any required licenses or classification to export, re-export or import deliverables. You agree not to export or re-export to entities on the current U.S. export exclusion lists or to any embargoed or terrorist countries as specified in the U.S. export laws. You agree to not use deliverables for prohibited nuclear, missile, or chemical biological weaponry end uses. See the Novell International Trade Service Web page (http://www.novell.com/info/exports/) for more information on exporting Novell software.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Resource Matrix Methodology: an Approach to Identifying Storage and Timing Channels
    Shared Resource Matrix Methodology: An Approach to Identifying Storage and Timing Channels RICHARD A. KEMMERER University of California, Santa Barbara Recognizing and dealing with storage and timing channels when performing the security analysis of a computer system is an elusive task. Methods for discovering and dealing with these channels have mostly been informal, and formal methods have been restricted to a particular specification language. A methodology for discovering storage and timing channels that can be used through all phases of the software life cycle to increase confidence that all channels have been identified is presented. The methodology is presented and applied to an example system having three different descriptions: English, formal specification, and high-order language implementation. Categories and Subject Descriptors: C.2.0 [Computer-Communication Networks]: General--se- curity and protection; D.4.6 ]Operating Systems]: Security and Protection--information flow controls General Terms: Security Additional Key Words and Phrases: Protection, confinement, flow analysis, covert channels, storage channels, timing channels, validation 1. INTRODUCTION When performing a security analysis of a system, both overt and covert channels of the system must be considered. Overt channels use the system's protected data objects to transfer information. That is, one subject writes into a data object and another subject reads from the object. Subjects in this context are not only active users, but are also processes and procedures acting on behalf of the user. The channels, such as buffers, files, and I/O devices, are overt because the entity used to hold the information is a data object; that is, it is an object that is normally viewed as a data container.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Resource
    Shared resource In computing, a shared resource, or network share, is a computer resource made available from one host to other hosts on a computer network.[1][2] It is a device or piece of information on a computer that can be remotely accessed from another computer transparently as if it were a resource in the local machine. Network sharing is made possible by inter-process communication over the network.[2][3] Some examples of shareable resources are computer programs, data, storage devices, and printers. E.g. shared file access (also known as disk sharing and folder sharing), shared printer access, shared scanner access, etc. The shared resource is called a shared disk, shared folder or shared document The term file sharing traditionally means shared file access, especially in the context of operating systems and LAN and Intranet services, for example in Microsoft Windows documentation.[4] Though, as BitTorrent and similar applications became available in the early 2000s, the term file sharing increasingly has become associated with peer-to-peer file sharing over the Internet. Contents Common file systems and protocols Naming convention and mapping Security issues Workgroup topology or centralized server Comparison to file transfer Comparison to file synchronization See also References Common file systems and protocols Shared file and printer access require an operating system on the client that supports access to resources on a server, an operating system on the server that supports access to its resources from a client, and an application layer (in the four or five layer TCP/IP reference model) file sharing protocol and transport layer protocol to provide that shared access.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Management in Multimedia Networked Systems
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Technical Reports (CIS) Department of Computer & Information Science May 1994 Resource Management in Multimedia Networked Systems Klara Nahrstedt University of Pennsylvania Ralf Steinmetz University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports Recommended Citation Klara Nahrstedt and Ralf Steinmetz, "Resource Management in Multimedia Networked Systems ", . May 1994. University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science Technical Report No. MS-CIS-94-29. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/331 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Resource Management in Multimedia Networked Systems Abstract Error-free multimedia data processing and communication includes providing guaranteed services such as the colloquial telephone. A set of problems have to be solved and handled in the control-management level of the host and underlying network architectures. We discuss in this paper 'resource management' at the host and network level, and their cooperation to achieve global guaranteed transmission and presentation services, which means end-to-end guarantees. The emphasize is on 'network resources' (e.g., bandwidth, buffer space) and 'host resources' (e.g., CPU processing time) which need to be controlled in order to satisfy the Quality of Service (QoS) requirements set by the users of the multimedia networked system. The control of the specified esourr ces involves three actions: (1) properly allocate resources (end-to-end) during the multimedia call establishment, so that traffic can flow according to the QoS specification; (2) control resource allocation during the multimedia transmission; (3) adapt to changes when degradation of system components occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Novell Cluster Services,. for Linux. and Netware
    Novell Cluster Services,. for Linux. and NetWare. ROB BASTIAANSEN SANDER VAN VUGT Novell PRESS. Novell. Published by Pearson Education, Inc. 800 East 96th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 USA Table of Contents Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1: Introduction to Clustering and High Availability 5 Novell Cluster Services Defined 5 Shared Disk Access 6 Secondary IP Addresses 7 Clustering Terminology 8 High-Availability Solutions Overview 12 Novell Cluster Services 12 Business Continuity Clustering 13 PolyServe Matrix Server 15 Heartbeat Subsystem for High-Availability Linux 16 When Not to Cluster Applications 16 Availability Defined 18 High Availability Defined 18 Calculating Average Downtime 21 Avoiding Downtime 22 Hardware 22 Environment 23 Software 23 Procedures 24 Novell Cluster Services Requirements 24 Hardware Requirements 24 Software Requirements 26 CHAPTER 2: Examining Novell Cluster Services Architecture 27 Novell Cluster Services Objects and Modules 27 Cluster eDirectory Objects 28 Cluster Modules 31 IH Novell Cluster Services for Linux and NetWare Heartbeats, Epoch Numbers, and the Split Brain Detector 35 Removing a Failing Slave Node 36 Removing a Failed Master Node 37 Summary 37 CHAPTER 3: Clustering Design 39 Cluster Design Guidelines 39 How Many Nodes to Choose 39 Using a Heartbeat LAN or Not 40 Use NIC Teaming 41 Choosing Storage Methods 42 Mirror the Split Brain Detector Partition 48 Selecting Applications to Run in a Cluster 48 eDirectory Cluster Guidelines 50 Creating a Failover Matrix 52 Application-Specific Design Guidelines
    [Show full text]
  • Novell® Platespin® Recon 3.7.4 User Guide 5.6.4 Printing and Exporting Reports
    www.novell.com/documentation User Guide Novell® PlateSpin® Recon 3.7.4 September 2012 Legal Notices Novell, Inc., makes no representations or warranties with respect to the contents or use of this documentation, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc., reserves the right to revise this publication and to make changes to its content, at any time, without obligation to notify any person or entity of such revisions or changes. Further, Novell, Inc., makes no representations or warranties with respect to any software, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc., reserves the right to make changes to any and all parts of Novell software, at any time, without any obligation to notify any person or entity of such changes. Any products or technical information provided under this Agreement may be subject to U.S. export controls and the trade laws of other countries. You agree to comply with all export control regulations and to obtain any required licenses or classification to export, re-export or import deliverables. You agree not to export or re-export to entities on the current U.S. export exclusion lists or to any embargoed or terrorist countries as specified in the U.S. export laws. You agree to not use deliverables for prohibited nuclear, missile, or chemical biological weaponry end uses. See the Novell International Trade Services Web page (http://www.novell.com/info/exports/) for more information on exporting Novell software.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Peer-Level Performance of Bittorrent
    Characterizing Peer-level Performance of BitTorrent DRP Report Amir H. Rasti ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION BitTorrent is one of the most popular Peer-to-Peer During the past few years, peer-to-peer appli- (P2P) content distribution applications over the cations have become very popular on the In- Internet that significantly contributes in network ternet. BitTorrent in one of the most popu- traffic. lar peer-to-peer applications providing scalable peer-to-peer content distribution over the In- In BitTorrent, a file is divided into segments ternet. Some recent studies [8] have shown that and participating peers contribute their outgoing BitTorrent is accountable for approximately bandwidth by providing their available segments 35% of the Internet traffic. BitTorrent is a to other peers while obtaining their missing peers scalable peer-to-peer content distribution sys- from others. Characterization of BitTorrent is use- tem that enables one-to-many distribution of ful in determining its performance bottlenecks as large files without requiring a large access link well as its impact on the network. bandwidth at the source. Similar to other peer- In this study, we try to address the following two to-peer systems, it uses resources of participat- key questions through measurement: (i) What are ing peers to increase the capacity of the system. the main factors that affect observed performance The main shared resource in BitTorrent is the by individual peers in BitTorrent?, and (ii) What up-link bandwidth of individual peers. The file are the contributions of these factors on the per- being distributed is divided into a large number formance of individual peers? To address these of segments.
    [Show full text]
  • NFS Gateway for Netware 6 Administration Guide October 22, 2003
    Novell Confidential Manual (99a) 11 September 2003 Novell * NFS Gateway for NetWare® 6 www.novell.com ADMINISTRATION GUIDE October 22, 2003 Novell Confidential Manual (99a) 11 September 2003 Legal Notices Novell, Inc. makes no representations or warranties with respect to the contents or use of this documentation, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc. reserves the right to revise this publication and to make changes to its content, at any time, without obligation to notify any person or entity of such revisions or changes. Further, Novell, Inc. makes no representations or warranties with respect to any software, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Further, Novell, Inc. reserves the right to make changes to any and all parts of Novell software, at any time, without any obligation to notify any person or entity of such changes. You may not export or re-export this product in violation of any applicable laws or regulations including, without limitation, U.S. export regulations or the laws of the country in which you reside. Copyright © 2003 Novell, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, photocopied, stored on a retrieval system, or transmitted without the express written consent of the publisher. U.S. Patent No. 5,157,663; 5,349,642; 5,455,932; 5,553,139; 5,553,143; 5,572,528; 5,594,863; 5,608,903;5,633,931; 5,652,859; 5,671,414;
    [Show full text]
  • Casual Resource Sharing with Shared Virtual Folders
    MASTER THESIS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE Casual Resource Sharing with Shared Virtual Folders Siri Birgitte Uldal June 15th, 2007 FACULTY OF SCIENCE Department of Computer Science University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø Casual Resource Sharing with Shared Virtual Folders Siri Birgitte Uldal June 15th, 2007 ___________________ University of Tromsø 2007 Abstract Proliferation of wireless networks has been a major trigger behind increased mobility of computing devices. Along with increased mobility come requests for ad-hoc exchange of resources between computing devices as an extension of humans interacting. We termed it casual resource sharing where resources in this thesis have been narrowed down to files only. We have named our casual resource sharing model for shared virtual folders (SVF). SVFs can be looked upon as a common repository much in the same way as the tuplespace model. The SVF members perceive the repository similarly to a common file directory on a server, while in reality all participating devices stores their own contribution of files. All types of files could be added to the repository and shared. To become a SVF member one needs to be invited by another member or initiate a SVF oneself. All members are free to withdraw their SVF membership whenever they wish. They are also free to log on to the SVF and log out as they please. The SVF cease to exist when the last member has drawn his membership. The SVF implements a simple versioning detection system to alert members when a file has been modified by another member. Feasibility of the model is demonstrated in a prototype implementation based on Java and the JXTA middleware, a peer-to-peer (P2P) infrastructure middleware supporting the Internet protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education Through Cloud Computing
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2017 A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education through Cloud Computing Jorge Edison Lascano Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Lascano, Jorge Edison, "A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education through Cloud Computing" (2017). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 6547. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6547 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PATTERN LANGUAGE FOR DESIGNING APPLICATION-LEVEL COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS AND THE IMPROVEMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION THROUGH CLOUD COMPUTING by Jorge Edison Lascano A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Computer Science Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Stephen W. Clyde, Ph.D. Curtis Dyreson, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Haitao Wang, Ph.D. Young-Woo Kwon, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Luis Gordillo, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2017 ii Copyright © Jorge Edison Lascano 2017 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education through Cloud Computing by Jorge Edison Lascano, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2017 Major Professor: Stephen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Layers Document
    CTMS/CTIS INTEGRATION Contract Routing No. 04 HAA 00063 Architecture Layers Version 1.1 Approved By Robert Wycoff CDOT ITS Office Signature: ___________________________ Date: _______________________________ John Williams CDOT ITS Office Signature: ___________________________ Date: _______________________________ Prepared By: CTMS/CTIS Version: 1.1 Architecture Layers Date: 08 Mar 2004 Revision History Date Version Description Author 08-Mar-2004 0.1 First Draft Jason Westra Sachin Saindane 27-Apr-04 0.2 Scheduler and Communications are Jason Westra services, not layers. Added Delegate Layer. 11-May-04 0.3 Added Notifications service and Services Jason Westra Catalog 21-May-04 0.4 Added New Architecture Drawing Sachin Saindane 07-March-05 1.1 Added more depth around layers and Jason Westra guidelines Confidential ©EnRoute Traffic Systems, Inc. Page 2 of 17 CTMS/CTIS Version: 1.1 Architecture Layers Date: 08 Mar 2004 Table of Contents i. Executive Summary 5 1.Introduction 6 1.1 Purpose 6 1.2 Scope 6 1.3 Audience 6 1.4 References 6 2. Logical Architecture Reference Model 7 2.1 Architectural Layers 7 3. Application Layer 9 3.1 Client Layer 10 3.2 Delegate Layer 11 3.3 Messaging Layer 11 3.4 Services Layer 12 4. Application Support Layer 13 5. External Services Layer 14 6. Platform Services Layer 15 7. Tiers 16 7.1 Client Tier 16 7.2 Presentation Tier 16 7.3 Business Tier 16 7.4 Integration Tier 17 7.5 Resource Tier 17 7.6 Achieving Deployment Agility 17 Confidential ©EnRoute Traffic Systems, Inc. Page 3 of 17 CTMS/CTIS Version: 1.1 Architecture
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Resource Sharing in an Nt Environment
    84-10-51 DATA SECURITY MANAGEMENT SECURITY AND RESOURCE SHARING IN AN NT ENVIRONMENT Gilbert Held INSIDE Overview; Share Creation; Setting Permissions; Multiple Identities; Considering Subfolders; Operational Control Because an understanding of the method by which shares are created fa- cilitates an understanding of different levels of data security associated with resource sharing, this article examines in detail the creation of a shared folder on one computer and its access via another computer. In doing so, this article references a series of screen images that illustrate the actual use of the Windows NT operating system to create shares and discusses and describes methods that control access to shared resources, providing different levels of security concerning the ability of network users to access shared resources and, once accessed, their ability to ma- nipulate data. PAYOFF IDEA OVERVIEW The ability to enable remote users to share re- Windows NT provides users with the sources on NT workstations and servers repre- ability to share access to the contents sents one of the major benefits of the use of this of an entire drive or folder over a operating system. By enabling employees in an organization to share access to drives, folders, network. Although shares only oper- and files, one obtains the ability to significantly ate at the drive and folder level, the enhance productivity. However, one also pro- operating system provides several vides the potential for other persons with access methods to control access down to to the organization’s network to either intention- individual files. ally or unintentionally read or modify existing data as well as store new files whose contents could Because sharing is integrated with have an adverse effect on the operation of the or- the operating system’s database of ganization.
    [Show full text]