DOCSLIB.ORG

Risk Assessment for Ship-Mediated Introductions of Aquatic Nonindigenous Species to the Canadian Arctic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Risk Assessment for Ship-Mediated Introductions of Aquatic Nonindigenous Species to the Canadian Arctic C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2011/105 Document de recherche 2011/105 Central and Arctic, and Québec Regions Région du Centre et de l’Arctique et du Québec Risk Assessment for ship-mediated Évaluation du risque d’introduction introductions of aquatic d’espèces aquatiques non indigènes par nonindigenous species to the les navires dans l’Arctique canadien Canadian Arctic F.T. Chan1, J.E. Bronnenhuber1,2, J.N. Bradie2, K.L. Howland3, N. Simard4 and S.A. Bailey2 1Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON 2Bayfield Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, ON 3Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, MB 4 Institut Maurice-Lamontagne, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Mont-Joli, QC This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2012 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 THE BIOLOGICAL INVASION PROCESS................................................................................1 THE ROLE OF SHIPPING AS A PATHWAY OF AQUATIC NIS INTRODUCTIONS ...............2 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS ...............................................................4 HISTORY OF AQUATIC NIS IN THE CANADIAN ARCTIC......................................................5 SPECIFIC ISSUES OF CONCERN TO THE CANADIAN ARCTIC..............................................6 BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS IN THE ARCTIC.............................................................................6 CLIMATE CHANGE ..................................................................................................................6 SHIP-MEDIATED INVASIONS VIA DOMESTIC SHIPPING ACTIVITIES ................................7 HULL FOULING IN THE ARCTIC .............................................................................................7 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................8 STUDY AREA ...........................................................................................................................8 DETERMINING HULL FOULING-MEDIATED INVASION RISK...............................................8 Step 1A: Estimating Probability of Arrival (Hull Fouling) ..................................................8 Step 1B: Estimating Probability of Survival (Hull Fouling)................................................9 Step 1C: Calculating Probability of Introduction (Hull Fouling).........................................9 Step 2: Estimating the Magnitude of Consequences (Hull Fouling) ...............................10 Step 3: Calculating Final Invasion Risk (Hull Fouling)....................................................10 ESTIMATING SHIP-MEDIATED SECONDARY SPREAD (HULL FOULING) ........................10 DETERMINING BALLAST-MEDIATED INVASION RISK .......................................................11 Step 1A: Estimating Probability of Arrival (Ballast Water) ..............................................11 Step 1B: Estimating Probability of Survival (Ballast Water)............................................13 Step 1C: Calculating Probability of Introduction (Ballast Water) ....................................14 Step 2: Estimating the Magnitude of Consequences (Ballast Water).............................14 Step 3: Calculating Final Invasion Risk (Ballast Water) .................................................14 ESTIMATING SHIP-MEDIATED SECONDARY SPREAD (BALLAST WATER).....................15 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................15 VESSEL ARRIVALS IN THE CANADIAN ARCTIC.................................................................15 Probability of Arrival (Hull Fouling) ......................................................................................16 International Merchant Vessels ......................................................................................16 Coastal Domestic Merchant Vessels..............................................................................16 International Non-merchant Vessel Arrivals ...................................................................16 Coastal Domestic Non-merchant Vessel Arrivals...........................................................17 iii Arctic Non-merchant Vessel Arrivals..............................................................................17 Probability of Survival (Hull Fouling)....................................................................................17 Probability of Introduction (Hull Fouling)..............................................................................17 Magnitude of Consequences (Hull Fouling).........................................................................18 Final Invasion Risk (Hull Fouling) ........................................................................................18 SECONDARY SPREAD BY HULL FOULING .....................................................................18 BALLAST WATER DISCHARGES IN THE CANADIAN ARCTIC ...........................................18 Probability of Arrival (Ballast Water) ....................................................................................19 International Merchant Vessels ......................................................................................19 Coastal Domestic Merchant Vessels..............................................................................19 Probability of Survival (Ballast Water) .................................................................................19 International Merchant Vessels ......................................................................................19 Coastal Domestic Merchant Vessels..............................................................................20 Probability of Introduction (Ballast Water) ...........................................................................20 Magnitude of Consequences (Ballast Water) ......................................................................20 Final Invasion Risk (Ballast Water)......................................................................................21 SECONDARY SPREAD BY BALLAST WATER..................................................................21 THE FUTURE OF SHIP-MEDIATED INVASIONS IN THE ARCTIC.......................................21 CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................................................22 REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................................22 TABLES ......................................................................................................................................32 FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................48 APPENDICES.............................................................................................................................60 iv Correct citation for this publication: Chan, F.T., Bronnenhuber, J.E., Bradie, J.N., Howland, K., Simard, N. and Bailey, S.A. 2012. Risk assessment for ship-mediated introductions of aquatic nonindigenous species to the Canadian Arctic. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2011/105. vi + 93 p. ABSTRACT Ballast water has historically been the predominant ship-mediated vector for aquatic non- indigenous species (NIS) introductions to Canada, while hull fouling is recognized as a leading sub-vector for the introduction of marine aquatic NIS worldwide. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no ship-mediated NIS established in the Canadian Arctic. However, if shipping activities increase as expected with a warming climate, propagule pressure will also increase and the Arctic will be more vulnerable to future invasions. The objective of this report was to conduct a relative risk assessment of shipping vectors (hull fouling and ballast water) to Canadian Arctic ports. First, the probability of introduction was estimated by combining the individual probabilities of successful transition through each stage of the invasion process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • C S a S S C C S
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2010/066 Document de recherche 2010/066 Ecosystem status and trends report: Rapport de l’état des écosystèmes et Arctic Marine Ecozones des tendances : écozones marines de l’Arctique Andrea Niemi, Joclyn Paulic and Don Cobb Fisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada Central & Arctic Region / Région du Centre et de l’Arctique 501 University Crescent / 501, University Crescent Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6 This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle the day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIÈRES ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Maps of Locations Mentioned in Global Review of The
    Regional Maps of Locations Mentioned in Global Review of the Conservation Status of Monodontid Stocks These maps provide the locations of the geographic features mentioned in the Global Review of the Conservation Status of Monodontid Stocks. Figure 1. Locations associated with beluga stocks of the Okhotsk Sea (beluga stocks 1-5). Numbered locations are: (1) Amur River, (2) Ul- bansky Bay, (3) Tugursky Bay, (4) Udskaya Bay, (5) Nikolaya Bay, (6) Ulban River, (7) Big Shantar Island, (8) Uda River, (9) Torom River. Figure 2. Locations associated with beluga stocks of the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska (beluga stocks 6-9). Numbered locations are: (1) Anadyr River Estuary, (2) Anadyr River, (3) Anadyr City, (4) Kresta Bay, (5) Cape Navarin, (6) Yakutat Bay, (7) Knik Arm, (8) Turnagain Arm, (9) Anchorage, (10) Nushagak Bay, (11) Kvichak Bay, (12) Yukon River, (13) Kuskokwim River, (14) Saint Matthew Island, (15) Round Island, (16) St. Lawrence Island. Figure 3. Locations associated with beluga stocks of the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, Canadian Arctic and West Greenland (beluga stocks 10-12 and 19). Numbered locations are: (1) St. Lawrence Island, (2) Kotzebue Sound, (3) Kasegaluk Lagoon, (4) Point Lay, (5) Wain- wright, (6) Mackenzie River, (7) Somerset Island, (8) Radstock Bay, (9) Maxwell Bay, (10) Croker Bay, (11) Devon Island, (12) Cunning- ham Inlet, (13) Creswell Bay, (14) Mary River Mine, (15) Elwin Bay, (16) Coningham Bay, (17) Prince of Wales Island, (18) Qeqertarsuat- siaat, (19) Nuuk, (20) Maniitsoq, (21) Godthåb Fjord, (22) Uummannaq, (23) Upernavik. Figure 4. Locations associated with beluga stocks of subarctic eastern Canada, Hudson Bay, Ungava Bay, Cumberland Sound and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Members' Absences from Sittings of the House
    REPORT OF MEMBERS' ABSENCES FROM SITTINGS OF THE HOUSE AND MEETINGS OF COMMITTEES AND CAUCUSES TO THE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NUNAVUT For the period: July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 ` Pursuant to section 36 of the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act Legislative Assembly of Nunavut Report of Members' Absences from Sittings of the House Members of the 5th Legislative Assembly July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 Sitting Official Constituency Member Medical Other Total Days Business Absent ~ Total Days Absent ~ Aggu Quassa Paul 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 Aivilik Netser Patterk 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Amittuq Kaernerk Joelie 6.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 Arviat North - Whale Cove Main John 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Arviat South Savikataaq Joe 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Baker Lake Mikkungwak Simeon 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cambridge Bay Ehaloak Jeannie 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gjoa Haven Akoak Tony 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Hudson Bay Rumbolt Allan 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iqaluit - Manirajak Arreak-Lightstone Adam 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Iqaluit - Niaqunnguu Angnakak Pat 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iqaluit - Sinaa Sheutiapik Elisapee 16.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.0 Iqaluit -Tasiluk Hickes George 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kugluktuk Kamingoak Mila 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 Netsilik Qirngnuq Emiliano 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pangnirtung Nakashuk Margaret 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Quttiktuq Akeeagok David 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rankin Inlet North - Chesterfield Inlet Towtongie Cathy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rankin Inlet South Kusugak Lorne 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South Baffin Joanasie David 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tununiq Qamaniq David 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Uqqummiut Keyootak Pauloosie 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Notes: Management and Services Board (MSB), Regular Members' Caucus (RMC) and Full Caucus (FC) are held on Sessional and Committee Meeting Days.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Environment– Wildlife Division
    Department of Environment– Wildlife Division Wildlife Research Section Department of Environment Box 209 Igloolik, NU X0A 0L0 Tel: (867) 934-2179 Fax: (867) 934-2190 Email: [email protected] Frequently Asked Questions Government of Nunavut 1. What is the role of the GN in issuing wildlife research permits? On June 1, 1999, Nunavut became Canada’s newest territory. Since its creation, interest in studying its natural resources has steadily risen. Human demands on animals and plants can leave them vulnerable, and wildlife research permits allow the Department to keep records of what, and how much research is going on in Nunavut, and to use this as a tool to assist in the conservation of its resources. The four primary purposes of research in Nunavut are: a. To help ensure that communities are informed of scientific research in and around their communities; b. To maintain a centralized knowledgebase of research activities in Nunavut; c. To ensure that there are no conflicting or competing research activities in Nunavut; and d. To ensure that wildlife research activities abide by various laws and regulations governing the treatment and management of wildlife and wildlife habitat in Nunavut. 2. How is this process supported by the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement? Conservation: Article 5.1.5 The principles of conservation are: a. the maintenance of the natural balance of ecological systems within the Nunavut Settlement Area; b. the protection of wildlife habitat; c. the maintenance of vital, healthy, wildlife populations capable of sustaining harvesting needs as defined in this article; and d. the restoration and revitalization of depleted populations of wildlife and wildlife habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • 023810 Rangifer Spec Issue
    The Ninth North American Caribou Workshop, S7 Kuujjuaq, Québec, Canada, 23-27 April, 2001. Status, population fluctuations and ecological relationships of Peary caribou on the Queen Elizabeth Islands: Implications for their survival Frank L. Miller1 & Anne Gunn2 1 Canadian Wildlife Service, Prairie & Northern Region, Room 200, 4999 - 98th. Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3 Canada ([email protected]). 2 Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Government of the Northwest Territories, Box 1320, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 3S8 Canada. Abstract: The Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) was recognized as 'Threatened' by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada in 1979 and 'Endangered' in 1991. It is the only member of the deer family (Cervidae) found on the Queen Elizabeth Islands (QEI) of the Canadian High Arctic. The Peary caribou is a significant part of the region's biodiversity and a socially important and economically valuable part of Arctic Canada's natural heritage. Recent microsatellite DNA findings indicate that Peary caribou on the QEI are distinct from caribou on the other Arctic Islands beyond the QEI, including Banks Island. This fact must be kept in mind if any translocation of caribou to the QEI is pro• posed. The subspecies is too gross a level at which to recognize the considerable diversity that exists between Peary cari¬ bou on the QEI and divergent caribou on other Canadian Arctic Islands. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada should take this considerable diversity among these caribou at below the subspecies classification to mind when assigning conservation divisions (units) to caribou on the Canadian Arctic Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Demande De La CNER Faisant L'objet D'un Examen Préalable
    Demande de la CNER faisant l’objet d’un examen préalable #125472 One Ocean Expeditions - Arctic 2019 cruise season Type de demande : New Type de projet: Tourisme Date de la demande : 5/30/2019 5:47:04 PM Period of operation: from 0001-01-01 to 0001-01-01 Autorisations proposées: from 0001-01-01 to 0001-01-01 Promoteur du projet: Aaron Lawton One Ocean Expeditions 38141 2nd Ave Squamish British Columbia V8B 0A6 Canada Téléphone :: 6043904900, Télécopieur :: DÉTAILS Description non technique de la proposition de projet Anglais: Expedition cruise tourism in the Canadian Arctic with a maximum of 146 passengers and 25 staff from around the world. We plan to operate 5 voyages in Nunavut on the RCGS Resolute from July 2019 through to September 2019. Ship visits are concentrated in ice-free zones and in arctic communities. Visits ashore last generally no longer than three hours.Our ship, the RCGS Resolute will drift or drop anchor while passengers disembark into small inflatable zodiacs. Passengers will cruise in zodiacs or will land on shore where appropriate. Français: Description du Projet :Nos opérons un vaisseau de tourisme style expédition capable de transporter un maximum de 146 passagers et 25 employés que nous employons de partout dans le monde. Nous planifions opérer 5 voyages dans le Nunavut en 2019 abord le RCGS Resolute à partir du mois de juillets jusqu’au mois de septembre. Les visites à bateau sont concentrées dans les zones d’eau libre ou se trouve la plupart des communautés de L’arctique. Nos visites ne durent pas plus que trois heures.
    [Show full text]
  • Demande De La CNER Faisant L'objet D'un Examen Préalable
    Demande de la CNER faisant l’objet d’un examen préalable #125330 MS SILVER CLOUD Arctic and Greenland Expedition Cruise (Voyage 1819, 18 August-03 September 2018) and Canada and New England Expedition Cruise (Voyage 1820, 03-18 September 2018) Type de demande : New Type de projet: Tourisme Date de la demande : 4/9/2018 1:41:37 PM Period of operation: from 0001-01-01 to 0001-01-01 Autorisations proposées: from 0001-01-01 to 0001-01-01 Promoteur du projet: Conrad Combrink Silversea Cruises Ltd Wells Fargo Center, 333 Southeast 2nd Avenue, Suite 2600 Miami Florida 33131 USA Téléphone :: 001 954 225 2567, Télécopieur :: 001 954 522 4499 DÉTAILS Description non technique de la proposition de projet Anglais: See attached Non-technical Project Proposal in English Français: See attached Non-technical Project Proposal in French Inuktitut: See attached Non-technical Project Proposal in Inuktitut Personnel Personnel on site: 960 Days on site: 12 Total Person days: 11520 Operations Phase: from 2018-08-16 to 2018-09-08 Activités Emplacement Type Statut des Historique du site Site à valeur Proximité des d’activité terres archéologique ou collectivités les paléontologique plus proches et de toute zone protégée Iqaluit Tourism Crown Capital of Nunavut Capital of Nunavut Capital of Activities Nunavut Pond Inlet Tourism Crown A small, N/A N/A Activities predominantly Inuit community in the Qikiqtaaluk Region of Nunavut, and is located in northern Baffin Island. Buchan Gulf Marine Based Marine N/A N/A Pond Inlet Activities Bylot Island Tourism Inuit Owned Unknown Unknown Pond Inlet we Activities Surface Lands believe is the nearest community.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Greenland Bulletin 185, 67-93
    Sedimentary basins concealed by Acknowledgements volcanic rocks The map sheet was compiled by J.C. Escher (onshore) In two areas, one off East Greenland between latitudes and T.C.R. Pulvertaft (offshore), with final compilation 72° and 75°N and the other between 68° and 73°N off and legend design by J.C. Escher (see also map sheet West Greenland, there are extensive Tertiary volcanic legend). In addition to the authors’ contributions to the rocks which are known in places to overlie thick sedi- text (see Preface), drafts for parts of various sections mentary successions. It is difficult on the basis of exist- were provided by: L. Melchior Larsen (Gardar in South ing seismic data to learn much about these underlying Greenland, Tertiary volcanism of East and West Green- sediments, but extrapolation from neighbouring onshore land); G. Dam (Cretaceous–Tertiary sediments of cen- areas suggests that oil source rocks are present. tral West Greenland); M. Larsen (Cretaceous–Tertiary Seismic data acquired west of Disko in 1995 have sediments in southern East Greenland); J.C. Escher (map revealed an extensive direct hydrocarbon indicator in of dykes); S. Funder (Quaternary geology); N. Reeh the form of a ‘bright spot’ with a strong AVO (Amplitute (glaciology); B. Thomassen (mineral deposits); F.G. Versus Offset) anomaly, which occurs in the sediments Christiansen (petroleum potential). Valuable comments above the basalts in this area. If hydrocarbons are indeed and suggestions from other colleagues at the Survey are present here, they could either have been generated gratefully acknowledged. below the basalts and have migrated through the frac- Finally, the bulletin benefitted from thorough reviews tured lavas into their present position (Skaarup & by John Korstgård and Hans P.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 36, No. 4 Winter 2013
    Volume 36, No. 4 Winter 2013 Journal of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, Canadian Region Regional Executive Committee, CPA (December 5, 2013) PRESIDENT REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVES Gene Zwozdesky, Alberta Russ Hiebert, Federal Branch Ross Wiseman, Newfoundland and Labrador FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT Gene Zwozdesky, Alberta Dale Graham, New Brunswick CHAIR OF THE CWP, CANADIAN SECTION SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT (Commonwealth Women Parliamentarians) Linda Reid, British Columbia Myrna Driedger, Manitoba PAST PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY-TREASURER Jacques Chagnon, Québec Blair Armitage Members of the Regional Council (December 5, 2013) HOUSE OF COMMONS SENATE Andrew Scheer, Speaker Noël Kinsella, Speaker Audrey O’Brien, Clerk Gary O’Brien, Clerk ALBERTA NOVA SCOTIA Gene Zwozdesky, Speaker Kevin Murphy, Speaker David McNeil, Secretary Neil Ferguson, Secretary BRITISH COLUMBIA ONTARIO Linda Reid, Speaker Dave Levac, Speaker Craig James, Secretary Deborah Deller, Secretary CANADIAN FEDERAL BRANCH PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Joe Preston, Chair Carolyn Bertram, Speaker Elizabeth Kingston, Secretary Charles MacKay, Secretary MANITOBA QUÉBEC Daryl Reid, Speaker Jacques Chagnon, Speaker Patricia Chaychuk, Secretary Catherine Durepos, Secretary NEW BRUNSWICK SASKATCHEWAN Dale Graham, Speaker Dan D’Autremont, Speaker Donald Forestell, Secretary Gregory Putz, Secretary NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Ross Wiseman, Speaker Jackie Jacobson, Speaker Sandra Barnes, Secretary Tim Mercer, Secretary NUNAVUT YUKON George Qulaut, Speaker David Laxton, Speaker John Quirke, Secretary Floyd McCormick, Secretary The Canadian Parliamentary Review was founded in 1978 to inform Canadian legislators about activities of the federal, provincial and territorial branches of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and to promote the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions. Contributions from legislators, former members, staff and all other persons interested in the Historic postcard image showing objectives of the Review are welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names Working in Greenland
    Methodology in collecting geographical names in Greenland Lisathe Møller • Specialized consultant at Oqaasileriffik, the Greenland Language Secretariat. • Secretary for the Geographical Names Authority, and Project Manager for collecting information about existing names and reporting to the Place Names Authority. Overview of my presentation/ Saqqummiussassama tulleriinneri • Place Names Authority Act in Greenland • Geographical naming methods in Greenland • Geographical names collection in Greenland Law on Greenland Geographical Names Authority • The Goverment set up the Greenland Geographical Names Authority in order to ensure the registration of, and authoritative advice and information on the naming of the geographical names. • The Greenland Geographical Names Authority’s objectives are: • to collect, register and authorize geographical names in Greenland, excluding local road and places inside municipal borders. • The Greenland Geographical Names Authority consists of 5 members, appointed by the Minister. • The Greenland Geographical Names Authority's competence cannot be wholly or partly transferred to the other. Geographical naming methods in Greenland • There are two main different methods of naming places in Greenland – Greenlanders naming of places and foreigners naming of places are different. Geographical naming methods in Greenland Greenlanders often named places according to their characteristics which resembles something. For example The island name is Uummannaq which means resemble a heart. Geographical naming methods in Greenland Greenlanders often named places according to its function • Nasittarfik is called that because sealers used to use the site as a lookout place. Nasittarfik means a lookout point. • The headland is called Pituffik. Because hunters used to catch a whale from a beach on site, and tethered the whale on a stone.
    [Show full text]