DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Cleveland County, North Carolina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Cleveland County, North Carolina United States In cooperation with Department of North Carolina Department Agriculture of Environment and Soil Survey of Natural Resources, North Carolina Agricultural Cleveland County, Research Service, North Carolina Natural Cooperative Extension North Carolina Resources Service, Cleveland Soil Conservation and Water Conservation Service District, and Cleveland County Board of Commissioners 3 How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in May 1999. Soil names and descriptions were approved in September 1998. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1998. This soil survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, the Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Cleveland County Board of Commissioners. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District. The Cleveland County Board of Commissioners provided financial assistance for the survey. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Cotton is a common crop on upland soils in Cleveland County, such as Appling and Cecil soils. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service home page on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 5 Contents Cover ....................................................................... 1 GrD—Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 How to Use This Soil Survey .................................. 3 percent slopes, rocky ................................... 49 Contents .................................................................. 5 GvE—Grover gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 60 Foreword ................................................................. 9 percent slopes, very stony ........................... 51 General Nature of the County ................................. 11 HeB—Helena-Worsham complex, 1 to 6 How This Survey Was Made ................................... 14 percent slopes ............................................. 52 General Soil Map Units ........................................ 17 HhB—Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 1. Uwharrie-Montonia-Tatum............................ 17 percent slopes ............................................. 54 2. Hulett-Madison-Grover................................. 18 HtC—Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 3. Madison-Bethlehem ..................................... 20 percent slopes, stony ................................... 55 4. Cecil-Pacolet ................................................ 21 HuC—Hulett-Saw complex, 4 to 15 percent 5. Pacolet-Bethlehem ....................................... 23 slopes, very rocky ........................................ 57 6. Pacolet-Saw ................................................. 25 HwB—Hulett-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 7. Evard-Cowee ............................................... 26 percent slopes ............................................. 59 8. Cliffield-Pigeonroost ..................................... 27 MaB2—Madison gravelly sandy clay loam, Detailed Soil Map Units ........................................ 29 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded .... 60 ApB—Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent MaC2—Madison gravelly sandy clay loam, slopes .......................................................... 30 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded .. 62 ApC—Appling sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent MbB2—Madison-Bethlehem complex, 2 to 8 slopes .......................................................... 31 percent slopes, stony, moderately eroded .... 63 BuB—Buncombe loamy sand, 1 to 5 percent McC2—Madison-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15 slopes, rarely flooded ................................... 32 percent slopes, very stony, moderately CaB2—Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent eroded ......................................................... 65 slopes, moderately eroded ........................... 34 MnB—Madison-Bethlehem-Urban land CeB—Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes .................... 67 slopes .......................................................... 36 MoE—Montonia very channery silt loam, ChA—Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony ............. 69 occasionally flooded..................................... 37 PaC2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 CpD—Cliffield-Pigeonroost complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, moderately eroded .............. 70 percent slopes, very stony ........................... 39 PaD2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 CpE—Cliffield-Pigeonroost complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, moderately eroded .............. 72 percent slopes, very stony ........................... 40 PbB2—Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 2 to 8 CrF—Cliffield-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, moderately eroded .............. 73 percent slopes ............................................. 42 PbC2—Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15 DAM—Dam ........................................................ 43 percent slopes, moderately eroded .............. 75 DoB—Dogue sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent PbD2—Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 15 to 25 slopes, rarely flooded ................................... 43 percent slopes, moderately eroded .............. 78 EvD—Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent PeD—Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 15 to 25 slopes, stony ................................................ 44 percent slopes, stony ................................... 80 EvE—Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent PrB—Pacolet-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, slopes, stony ................................................ 46 2 to 8 percent slopes.................................... 82 EwF—Evard-Cowee complex, 50 to 85 percent PrC—Pacolet-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, slopes, rocky ................................................ 48 8 to 15 percent slopes.................................. 84 6 PsB2—Pacolet-Saw complex, 2 to 8 percent Recreation ........................................................ 128 slopes, moderately eroded ........................... 86 Wildlife Habitat ................................................. 129 PsC2—Pacolet-Saw complex, 8 to 15 percent Engineering ...................................................... 131 slopes, moderately eroded ........................... 87 Soil Properties .................................................... 137 PtD—Pacolet-Saw complex, 15 to 25 percent Engineering Index Properties ........................... 137 slopes, stony ................................................ 89 Physical and Chemical Properties .................... 138 PuC—Pacolet-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 Water Features ................................................. 139 percent slopes ............................................. 91 Soil Features
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Ings Mountain NATIONAL MILITARY PA'rk
    /(ings Mountain NATIONAL MILITARY PA'RK SOUTH CAROLINA Kings Mountain NATIONAL MILITARY PARK United States Department of the Interior, J. A. Krug, Secretary National Park Service, Newton B. Drury, Director Climax of a victorious rising of American frontiersmen against British and Tories in the Carolina foothills in 1780 which foreshadowed the British military defeats of 178I Kings Mountain, the fierce attack of American Unimpeded by effective resistance, the British frontiersmen on October 7, 1780, against Corn- Southern Campaign swept unchecked through wallis' scouting force under Ferguson, was an Georgia and part of South Carolina during unexpected onslaught carried out in the foothills 1778-79. The surrender of Gen. Benjamin Lin- of northwestern South Carolina. This sudden up- coln's American army at Charleston, in May rising of the stalwart Alleghany mountaineers, 1780, greatly strengthened the British position. for the protection of their homes and people Soon most of South Carolina, except a few dis- from the threat of Tory invasion under British tricts in the Piedmont, was overrun by British leadership, was relatively isolated in conception and Royalist forces directed by Lord Cornwallis. and execution from the main course of the His plans for an immediate invasion of North Revolutionary War in the South. Carolina were upset temporarily by the advance Clearly unforeseen in the grand British plan of a new American army under Gates. At Cam- to subjugate the South in a final effort to end den, on August 16, 1780, Gates suffered a disas- the Revolution, this accidental encounter in the trous defeat, again leaving South Carolina and Southern Piedmont delayed incidentally, but did the route northward open to the British.
    [Show full text]
  • William Campbell of King's Mountain David George Malgee
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 8-1983 A Frontier Biography: William Campbell of King's Mountain David George Malgee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Malgee, David George, "A Frontier Biography: William Campbell of King's Mountain" (1983). Master's Theses. 1296. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses/1296 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Frontier Biography: William Campbell of King's Mountain by David George Malgee A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Richmond In Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in History August, 1983 A Frontier Biography: William Campbell of King's Mountain Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the Graduate School of the University of Richmond by David George Malgee Approved: Introduction . l Chapter I: The Early Years ........................................ 3 Chapter II: Captain Campbell ...................................... 22 Chapter III: The Outbreak of the American Revolution .............. 39 Chapter IV: The Quiet Years, 1777 - 1778 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 56 Chapter V: The Critical Months, April 1779 - June 1780 ............ 75 Chapter VI: Prelude to Fame . 97 Chapter VII: William Campbell of King's Mountain .................. 119 Chapter VIII: Between Campaigns, November - December 1780 ......... 179 Chapter IX: The Guilford Courthouse Campaign ...................... 196 Chapter X: General William Campbell, April - August 1781 .........
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Mountain
    Kings Mountain: OBJECTIVES “The Turn of the Tide” The student will be able to: The Battle of Kings Mountain (October 7, 1780) was one of the 1) describe the mission of most dramatic and hotly contested battles of the Revolutionary War. Major Patrick Ferguson in On an isolated ridge top in the Carolina backcountry, nearly 1000 the Carolinas during the American Patriots surrounded and overwhelmed an approximately 1780 campaign; equal number of American Loyalists. The only Briton on the field was Major Patrick Ferguson, commander of the Loyalist force. The 2) discuss the treatment of Loyalists fought in close-order ranks with volley fire and bayonet the Loyalists after the battle charges, while the Patriots fought frontier-style from behind trees and why they were treated in and rocks. The rout of the Loyalists at Kings Mountain was the first such a manner; major setback for Britain’s southern strategy and started a chain of events that culminated in Cornwallis’s surrender at Yorktown. 3) list three reasons why the Battle of Kings The Key to British Victory - The Carolinas Mountain was significant The rout of the Patriot army under General Gates at the Battle to the Southern Campaign; of Camden on August 16, 1780, and Tarleton’s defeat of militia Colonel Thomas Sumter at Fishing Creek two days later 4) recognize critical encouraged the British and temporarily stunned the Patriot cause. errors in judgment made After Camden, Cornwallis by Major Patrick Ferguson. faced no sizable Patriot army in the Carolinas, but partisan attacks on his detachments, wagon trains, and messengers continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Parks Is Not Recognized on the List of Casualties on the 1909 Monument at Kings Mountain
    Henry Parks is not recognized on the list of casualties on the 1909 monument at Kings Mountain. He was wounded by a pewter ball through the arm. Tory doctor Uzal Johnson treated the wound the next day. Henry’s uncle, George Parks, was assigned by Colonel Benjamin Cleveland to escort him home. It took two months for Henry to recover. Henry lived on Parks Creek adjoining the Surry/Wilkes County line near Gabriel Loving and William Loving, near Little Elkin River. George is the probable bearer of the news of the Lewis and Biecknell wounds to their neighborhoods. Henry Parks’ Georgia certificate 30.615 was issued 04May1836 for a federal pension at $40/annum in Franklin County. The pension was suspended 15Oct1839. The archives do not explain administration from 1839 to his 1845 death. Parks was granted 287.5 acres of bounty land in Franklin County, Georgia Federal pension application files: Henry Parks http://www.revwarapps.org/s31898.pdf George Parks http://revwarapps.org/w27457.pdf John Stonecypher http://www.revwarapps.org/s16539.pdf From Henry’s deposition: That he entered the service of the United States in the Militia of North Carolina in Wilkes County in 1774 or 1775 under Captain Guest [Moses Guest] as a volunteer & was placed under command of General Rutherford [Griffith Rutherford], was marched to the Valley Towns in the Cherokee Nation, were on scouting parties & took some prisoners served at that time two months and was discharged by Col Armstrong. He afterwards enlisted in the Militia for six months as a Minute Man under Lieutenant Benjamin Cleveland and Captain Walton, was marched against the Tories & Scotch to Cross Creek (now Fayetteville), served out the six months and was discharged by Captain Walton.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob Martin
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Jacob Martin S7172 fn26NC Transcribed by Will Graves rev'd 4/11/09 & 6/10/16 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather than
    [Show full text]
  • WGS Bulletin Subject Index by Keyword
    WGS Bulletin Subject Index By Keyword Keyword Issue Vol:Num:Pg Article Title Absher Fall 1980 14:3:(14) Absher Family Bible Bible record of the family of William M and Nancy J. Reynolds Absher and some of their descendants, beginning in 1871. Abshire Summer 1987 21:2:(7-8) Family Records Some family records with the Absher surname found in the book of Family Records that belonged to Susanna Vannoy, dating from the late 1800s into the 1900s. Academy May 1975 9:2:(2-3) Cover Picture A picture and a short history of the 1934 Sulphur Springs Academy Building. Adams May 1968 2:2:(8) Daniel Adams Former Wilkes native A brief history of Judge Daniel Adams, a Wilkes Co., NC native, from a Johnson County Missouri History in 1881. Aug. 1969 3:3:(1) Jesse Adams Bible Record The Bible record of the Jesse Adams family, beginning in the late 1700s. Feb. 1970 4:1:(1) Jesse Adams Bible Continued A continued record of the Jesse Adams Bible from mid 1800s. Spring 1976 10:1:(6) Revolutionary War Pension Abstracts A brief statement pertaining to the affidavits and letters involving Henry Adams Rev. War Application by his wife, Susanna. Fall 1987 21:3:(22) From the Patriot A brief death announcement on 20 June 1907 for J. W. Adams, Sr. Spring 1988 22:1:(14) Bible Records A list of translated Bible Records for John Adams, born 1776, and some of his descendants. Spring 1989 23:1:(9) The Rev. John Adams' Bible The Bible Records of Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of King's Mountain
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1997 North Carolina Revolutionaries in Arms: The Battle of King's Mountain David Scott Dildy College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dildy, David Scott, "North Carolina Revolutionaries in Arms: The Battle of King's Mountain" (1997). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626131. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-engq-4p81 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORTH CAROLINA REVOLUTIONARIES IN ARMS: THE BATTLE OF KING'S MOUNTAIN A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by David Dildy 1997 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is presented in partial fulfillment the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Approved, June 1997 James Axtell Michael McGiffSrt L 'ames P. Whittenburgo ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to Professors James Axtell, James Whittenburg, and Michael McGiffert for their guidance and criticism throughout the course of my research and writing. I am also deeply indebted to my father and, most especially, to my mother, who did not live to see this work completed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Known Patriots at the Battle of Kings Mountain October 7, 1780
    The Known Patriots at the Battle of Kings Mountain October 7, 1780 Image Courtesy of National Park Planner at www.npplan.com © 2015 – J.D. Lewis www.carolana.com Note #1 Most who study the Battle of Kings Mountain are certainly aware that the Patriot leaders made a smart choice in leaving the “infantry” behind, and for only “able horsemen” to ride on. What they intuitively “know” – but seem to fail to thoroughly “embrace” is: Almost all “officers” had good horses. Therefore…. Many Patriot “Captains” had few men, sometimes no men, under their command during the actual battle at Kings Mountain. Most historians refuse to accept that at this important event, there were almost more Patriot officers engaged than militiamen, and that this is significant. Majors led as few as two (2) Captains, and many who had no men, or only one to five. It was rare, but some Captains did have more than ten men. Few had their original companies at full strength. It will soon be shown that the companies averaged only 5 men. 2 Note #2 Although the British seized Charlestown and many officers, and they once again devastated both the SC and NC militia at the Battle of Camden, the Patriots constantly kept rebuilding their militia in both states, and they retained their “semblance of order” by continuing the well-known “regiments” and recognized the leaders of all established militia units. Leaders of these well-established and well-known militia regiments agreed to “work with each other” for the common good of all. Ever since the start of the war, Captains attached themselves to other regiments when it was convenient.
    [Show full text]
  • Elisha Reynolds W4060
    Southern Campaign American Revolution Pension Statements Pension application of Elisha Reynolds W4060 Judith fn71NC Transcribed by Will Graves rev'd 1/1/10 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Also, the handwriting of the original scribes often lends itself to varying interpretations. Users of this database are urged to view the original and to make their own decision as to how to decipher what the original scribe actually wrote. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. Folks are free to make non- commercial use this transcript in any manner they may see fit, but please extend the courtesy of acknowledging the transcriber—besides, if it turns out the transcript contains mistakes, the resulting embarrassment will fall on the transcriber.] State of North Carolina, Wilkes County: Court of Pleas & Quarter Sessions October Term 1832. On this the 30th of October A.D. 1832 personally appeared before the Court of Pleas & Quarter Sessions of said County Elijah Reynolds a resident in the County of Wilkes & State of North Carolina aged 78 years who being duly sworn according to Law doth make the following declaration in order to obtain the benefit of the provisions made by the act of Congress passed June 7th, 1832. In the spring of the year 1776 I resided in what was then called Surry County, now Wilkes [County], on the Yadkin River State of North Carolina and have resided in the same part of the Country ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Joseph D. Turrentine Why Neighbor Fought Neighbor: A
    ABSTRACT Joseph D. Turrentine Why Neighbor Fought Neighbor: A Study of Western North Carolina’s Internal Conflict During the Revolutionary and Civil Wars. (Under the Direction of Dr. John Inscoe) During the Revolutionary War, western North Carolina maintained one of the highest loyalist populations of any region in the thirteen colonies. Nearly one hundred years later, this same region contained widespread unionist sentiment during the Civil War. In a region just tame enough to settle yet too wild to firmly control, the ruling class chose repression to maintain their grip on the region. In both centuries, conditions were ripe for internal conflict, but for different reasons. Eventually, in both conflicts neighbor executed neighbor and western North Carolina populations descended into anarchy. In Wilkes Country during the Revolutionary War, Benjamin Cleveland personified the western ruling class, their overall impact on the outcome of the American Revolution, and Cleveland’s story represents a good starting point for comparison. By comparing and contrasting these two internal conflicts, I hope to more fully expose the societal parallels that led to total breakdown, and to detect what impacts, if any, that the first struggle had on the second. INDEX WORDS: Internal War, Revolutionary War, Civil War, Loyalist, Unionist, Ruling Class, Western North Carolina, Repression WHY NEIGHBOR FOUGHT NEIGHBOR: A STUDY OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA’S INTERNAL CONFLICTS DURING THE REVOLUTIONARY AND CIVIL WARS by Joseph D. Turrentine A Thesis Submitted to the Honors Council of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree BACHELOR OF ARTS in HISTORY with HONORS Athens, Georgia 2009 WHY NEIGHBOR FOUGHT NEIGHBOR: A STUDY OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA’S INTERNAL CONFLICTS DURING THE REVOLUTIONARY AND CIVIL WARS by JOSEPH D.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Byways
    n c s c e n i c b y w a y s a h c rol rt in o a n fourth edition s c s en ay ic byw North Carolina Department of Transportation Table of ConTenTs Click on Byway. Introduction Legend NCDOT Programs Rules of the Road Cultural Resources Blue Ridge Parkway Scenic Byways State Map MOuntains Waterfall Byway Nantahala Byway Cherohala Skyway Indian Lakes Scenic Byway Whitewater Way Forest Heritage Scenic Byway appalachian Medley French Broad Overview Historic Flat Rock Scenic Byway Drovers Road Black Mountain Rag Pacolet River Byway South Mountain Scenery Mission Crossing Little Parkway New River Valley Byway I-26 Scenic Highway u.S. 421 Scenic Byway Pisgah Loop Scenic Byway upper Yadkin Way Yadkin Valley Scenic Byway Smoky Mountain Scenic Byway Mt. Mitchell Scenic Drive PIedmont Hanging Rock Scenic Byway Colonial Heritage Byway Football Road Crowders Mountain Drive Mill Bridge Scenic Byway 2 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP Table of ConTenTs uwharrie Scenic Road Rolling Kansas Byway Pee Dee Valley Drive Grassy Island Crossing Sandhills Scenic Drive Birkhead Wilderness Route Flint Hill Ramble Indian Heritage Trail Pottery Road Devil’s Stompin’ Ground Road North Durham Country Byway averasboro Battlefield Scenic Byway Clayton Bypass Scenic Byway Scots-Welsh Heritage Byway COastaL PLain Blue-Gray Scenic Byway Meteor Lakes Byway Green Swamp Byway Brunswick Town Road Cape Fear Historic Byway Lafayette’s Tour Tar Heel Trace edenton-Windsor Loop Perquimans Crossing Pamlico Scenic Byway alligator River Route Roanoke Voyages Corridor Outer Banks Scenic Byway State Parks & Recreation areas Historic Sites For More Information Bibliography 3 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP inTroduction The N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019
    Bethabara Chapter of Winston-Salem North Carolina State Society Sons of the American Revolution The Bethabara Bugler Volume 1, Issue 13 October 1, 2019 Chartered 29 October 1994 Re-Organized 08 November 2014 The Bethabara Bugler is the Newsletter of the Bethabara Chapter of Winston-Salem. It is published monthly (except during the months of June, July, and August when there will only be one summer edition). It will be distributed by email, usually at the first of the month. Articles, suggestions, and ideas are welcome – please send them to: Allen Mollere, 3721 Stancliff Road, Clemmons, NC 27012, or email: [email protected]. Bethabara Chapter September Meeting (Meeting minutes submitted by Recording Secretary Andy Kelly) The Bethabara Chapter, NCSSAR met September 12, 2019 at Pizza 66. 13 members and 3 guests were present. Chapter President Ed Hosmer called the meeting to order at 12:30 PM and reported/acted upon the following: • Toast to George Washington was well attended • Past President Fred Learned was presented a certificate of appreciation • Compatriots Nathaniel Eliason and Daniel Parsons were sworn in as new members • Nathaniel Eliason gave a presentation on his Patriot Samuel Kinsey JR • Daniel Parsons gave a presentation on his Patriot Benjamin Grier • A report was given on the National BOM meeting Page 1 of 12 • Orin Sadler volunteered to be a liaison for the JROTC programs • Chapter Officers made their reports New Business: • Orin Sadler agreed to Chair a committee to update the Chapter Constitution and By-Laws. The goal is to have the updates complete by January 2020 • It was agreed to hold an evening holiday party at Ed’s house December 12, 2019 • Plans were reviewed for the 92nd State Convention to be held in Winston-Salem April 3-5, 2020.
    [Show full text]