Space Insurance Law--With a Special Focus on Satellite Launch and In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Insurance Law--With a Special Focus on Satellite Launch and In Space Insurance Law-with a Special Focus on Satellite Launch and In-Orbit Policies -, By Pamela L. Meredith uring the first months of 2007, Space News reported satellite customers in the event Das follows: ofa launch failure. Satellite cus­ tomers have the option under Imaging satellite operator GeoEye expects to me a $40 mil­ such launch services agreements ofpaying a "premium" lion insurance claimfor whatis nowexpected to be the total loss ofits OrbView-3 satellite, whose main camera mal­ to the launch provider for a reflight or a refund guarantee. functioned without warning March 4, [2007] company The launch provider, in turn, may insure that risk. officials told fmancial analysts March 19. 1 Insurance is also available to cover third-party liability in the event ofinjury, loss, or damage to innocent bystanders The fIrst lalmch of2007 bySea Launch Company liC ended resulting from the launch.4 This insurance is generally taken in failure when the Zenit 3SL lalUlch vehicle carrying the SES out by the launch proVider and typically covers, as additional NewSkies NSS-8 telecommunications satellite was destroyed insureds, the satellite operator and manufacturer and other as it was lifting offfrom the company's mobile launch plat­ parties that are involved in lawlch operations. For U.S. 2 foml in the Pacific Ocean launch companies, such insurance coverage is mandated by s The two quotes illustrate the significance ofspace insur­ the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended. ance. GeoEye, ofDulles, Virginia, and SES New Skies, ofThe U.S. launch companies must obtain this insurance as a condi­ Hague, the Netherlands, are both satellite operators. Geo­ tion ofthe launch license granted by the Federal Aviation Eye's satellite failed in orbit after less than four years ofoper­ Administration (FAA).6 ation;3 SES New Skies' satellite was destroyed during launch. In a recent development, insurers are also being asked to The benefit ofinsurance is obvious in the face ofsuch respond to the needs for insurance ofprospective commer­ losses, and any loss suffered by the launch vehicle operator, cial hwnan spaceflight operators? Suborbital human space­ Sea Launch, ofLong Beach, California. flights have been licensed bythe FAA,8 and suchflights may Leaving aside these particular actors and their respec­ become commercially available in the nearfuture. These tive insurance an'angements, the purpose of this article is spaceflight operators, or "spacelines," will need insurance first, to explain what space insurance is and, second, solutions to protect against liability to passengers, refelTed focus on satellite launch and in-orbit insurance, explain to as "space flight participants," or their survivors or[man­ how such insurance is obtained and on what terms. cial sponsors, among other tisks and liabilities. Spaceflight operators should not rely solely on contractual waivers oflia­ Categories of space insurance bility9 or otherexculpatory clauses, 10 statutorily based Insurance is available to cover satellite loss or damage "informed consent,"ll or state-based legislative initiativesl2 during the following phases ofthe satellite project: manu­ to protectthemselves against liability. facturing and prelaunch activities, launch into space, and in-orbit life. Insurance duting the manufactuting and Obtaining satellite launch and in-orbit insurance prelaunch phase is generally taken out by the spacecraft Satellite launch and in-orbit insurance is provided by manufacturer. Launch and in-orbit insurance typically is the world insurance market. Because ofthe large insur­ obtained by the satellite operator, and the policy is ance amounts involved, no single insurer will provide the referred to as a "satellite launch and in-orbit policy." It is a insurance. Satellite insurance may cover the value ofthe first-party property insurance policy. The spacecraft man­ satellite, the launch, and the insurance premium, in all ufacturer, in addition, may have product liability coverage often in excess of $150-200 million for a geostationary on the satellite. communications satellite. Or it may cover only the value Insurance is also available to cover the expendable ofthe satellite or a portion ofit. launch vehicle and/or reflight or refund guarantees, Major space insurers include Mw1ich Re ofGermany; which the major launch providers routinely offer to their Swiss Re ofSwitzerland; Lloyds ofLondon; Belmuda-based XL Aerospace andACE Group (both with offices in the Pamela 1. Meredith is co-chair of the Zuckert Scoutt & Rasenberger, United States); Global Aerospace ofthe United Kingdom L.L.P., Space Law Practice Group and an adjunct professor of space (also with offices in the United States); La Reunion Spatiale, law at American University's Washington College of Law. Marshall M. Lammers, an associate of Ms. Meredith's firm, has greatly SCOR, and SpaceCo Group AGF ofFrance; andTokio Marine assisted in the preparation of this article. of]apan. These insurers may participate inforeign place- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IVo!ulne 21, No.4, 2008 The Air & Space Lawyer 13 ments through local orotherwise licensed subsidiaries and to assume the risk. It is, therefore, critical that the infor­ they may reinsure all orpalt ofthe lisk. Insurers, for exam­ mation be accurate, complete, and up-to-date. This is ple, in India and China, palticipate in especially important in satellite insurance because the their respective national markets. They statistical database is relatively small, compared, for exam­ in tum reinsure the lisk. ple, to life or home insurance. Moreover, key information Insurance is obtained through the on the palticular satellite is not otherwise available to use ofspecialized space insurance bro­ insurers, due to the proprietary nature ofthe information kers. The broker, in conjunction with and due to national export controls that restrict access to the satellite company and its counsel, technical data. 14 helps design the insurance coverage Ifthe insured fails to provide materially accurate or and draft the policy. The satellite insur­ complete information, IS it cannot recovet for the loss, ance policy thus is "broker manu­ pursuant to the misrepresentation clause in the policy. sclipted," although several ofthe pol­ The clause prohibits misrepresentationl6 01' concealment, icy clauses have become fairly in writing or otherwise, of material facts 01' citcumstances standardized. The precise language still telating to the policy or the insured satellite. 17 The mistep­ often varies from one policy to the tesentation must be material, which in some jurisdictions next, even for the standard clauses. means that the insurer would not have issued the exact The policy is usually preceded by a same policy had it known the truth. IS In some jurisdic­ "slip," a briefoutline ofthe risk and cer­ tions, fot example, NewYork, the misrepresentation may tain key terms, prepared by the broker. be innocent. 19 The broker requests premium quotes from prospective To ensure that the infOlTIlation provided by the insured insurers and negotiates policy terms on behalfofthe insured. remains up-to-date, satellite insurance policies contain a Once the terms are agreed, interested insurers subsclibe to so-called "material changes" clause. Keeping the inf01"ma­ the insurance placement bysigning on to separate, but usu­ tion current is impOltant because the policy is often ally virtually identical, policies. issued several months before the launch ofthe satellite, when risk attaches. The clause requires the insured to The satellite launch and in-orbit insurance policy inform insuters when it becomes aware ofa material change to the information pteviously provided to insur­ Scope ofthepolicy ers. The material change test is objective. The insurers A satellite lalillch and in-orbit insurance policy gener­ have the option to tenegotiate the policy ifthe change ally covers the risk ofloss of, or damage to, the satellite tesults in a material increase in risk. 20 If the insured fails during launch and the first year ofin-orbit life. 13 The telTIl to notify of a material change, it cannot latet recover may be longer than one year, depending on the particular for a related loss. The insuret does not need to show satellite, the insurance market at the time, and the insured's that it, in fact, would have renegotiated the policy had it needs and willingness to pay the premium. Otherwise, been informed. the policy is subject to renewal on an annual basis. While many otherinsurance policies issued today cover the insured even for its own negligence, this is not the case Keypolicy clauses with satellite launch and in-orbit insurance. The policy Following is a discussion ofsome ofthe key clauses in imposes a "due diligence" obligation on the insured satellite the satellite launch and in-orbit policy. The discussion is company requiring it to exercise due care with respect to the based on a typical policy; individual situations may vary. insured satellite. 21 There are several reasons f01" this require­ Risk attaches under the policy at launch or on inten­ ment: The satellite is a high-value asset; insurets do not have tional ignition ofthe launch vehicle engines. From that access to it and carmot inspect all the relevant technical doc­ moment on, the insurer assumes the risk under the policy umentation, which is proprietary and exportcontrolled; and, ofsatellite loss, damage, or defect and will indemnify the last but not least, once the satellite is launched, it cannot be satellite operator, subject to all ofthe policy terms, condi­ tetrieved for repair. Therefore, the insurer needs to be able tions, and exclusions. Risk terminates at the end ofthe to rely onits insured to take reasonable care ofthe insured policy period, as determined by the insurance policy, for property. Ifthe insured fails to complywith the due dili­ example, after two years, or when the satellite is declared gence requirement, it carmot recover for its loss. 22 a total loss or constructive total loss, or when paltialloss The policy requites that the loss occur between attach­ payments together equal the sum insured, whichever ment oflisk and telmination oflisk.
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF (77.1
    Index Abraham, K.S. 133 Beck, Ulrich 129 absorbing risk 133 behavioral anomalies 6, 84–9, 243–4 actuarial estimation 109–10 behavior-control functions 106 ad hoc Beijing Normal University 90, 189, assistance 196 235 compensation tool 45 Ben-Shahar, Omri 134 direct payment 40, 169, 207 Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance institutions 30 Reform Act of 2012 69, 152 relief 71, 97 Bruggeman, Véronique 95 adaptation 253 business interruption 104 and climate change 103, 164 adverse selection 5, 13, 47, 54, 66–8, California Earthquake Authority 55, 75, 81–2, 97, 99, 111, 127, 140, 142 162, 246 capacity (of insurers) 6–8, 11, 19, 30, AES v Steadfast 116–19 53, 63–6, 82–4, 89–91, 96, 113, agricultural insurance 122–3, 126, 136, 152, 161–2 173, government-subsidized 50 176, 179–80, 217, 222, 225, 227–8, pilot projects 49 242–3, 249–52 policies 49, 50 and reinsurance 199, 206–8, 215 Regulation on Agriculture Insurance capacity gap 82, 228, 242, 252 50, 94 capital markets 11, 53, 54, 59, 64–5, aircraft insurance 110 212, 217–8, 221, 226–40 all-hazard insurance policy 245 Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Alternative Risk Transfers (ARTs) 217, Facility 60 221, 236 catastrophe (cat) bonds 3, 113, 182, ambiguity of risk 112–13 212 217–40 see also uncertainty see also insurance-linked securities, American International Group (AIG) insurance securitization 1, 104 catastrophe derivatives 182, 221–2 “appetite” of insurers 84 catastrophe disasters 5, 8, 12–6, 72, 74, Arrow, Kenneth 35 92, 102, 155, 171–3, 255–6 asbestos claims 108–9 see also natural catastrophes assessment insurance 110 catastrophe fund 142, 210–12, 254 asset-backed securitization 237 catastrophe insurance 6, 8–11, 13–4, Association of British Insurers (ABI) 44, 73, 80, 89–99, 103, 105, 108, 148, 149 112–14, 121–8, 129–175, 208–9, authoritarian regime 7, 33 212–5, 216 availability crisis 52 affordability 63, 66, 69–70, 125, 127–8 174, 206, 250, 256 Baker, Tom 133, 134 demand 84–9, 92–3 Barry, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Incentives and Barriers of the Cyber Insurance Market in Europe June 2012
    Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe June 2012 Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe I Acknowledgements This Study was commissioned and managed by ENISA with specialist services provided by RAND Europe. ENISA would like to thank Mr. Neil Robinson for his professionalism and dedication to this project. In addition, ENISA wishes to acknowledge and thank Prof. Robin Bloomfield of City University of London, Mr. Andrea Renda of CEPS, Mr. Michael Mainelli of Z/Yen, Mrs. Simona Cavallini and Mr. Fabio Bisogni of Formit Foundation for their prompt support, valuable input and material provided for the compilation of this Study. II Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe About ENISA The European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) is a centre of network and information security expertise for the EU, its member states, the private sector and Europe’s citizens. ENISA works with these groups to develop advice and recommendations on good practice in information security. It assists EU member states in implementing relevant EU legislation and works to improve the resilience of Europe’s critical information infrastructure and networks. ENISA seeks to enhance existing expertise in EU member states by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU. More information about ENISA and its work can be found at www.enisa.europa.eu Contact details For contacting ENISA or for general enquiries on this Study on cyber insurance market in Europe please contact Nicole Falessi and Dr. Konstantinos Moulinos and use the following details: Resilience and CIIP Program Technical Department Email: [email protected] Incentives and barriers of the cyber insurance market in Europe III Legal notice Notice must be taken that this publication represents the views and interpretations of the authors and editors, unless stated otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Covering the Increased Liability of New Launch Markets
    32nd Space Symposium, Technical Track, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America Presented on April 11-12, 2016 COVERING THE INCREASED LIABILITY OF NEW LAUNCH MARKETS Robert Williams, [email protected] Kevin Walsh, [email protected] ABSTRACT The next generation space race prize is the integration of space dependent technology reliably in modern society. This paper is offered as an examination of an expanding diverse space launch industry as well as the necessity for increased capacity of resources in the underwriting space. Consumers are already space application dependent. There are 1 billion GPS receivers already deployed and expected to grow to 7 billion by 2022. As an example, satellites transformed 800 analogue channels in 1991 to more than 25,000 digital channels today. Without GPS, money isn’t accessible from an ATM. Space plays a greater role in day-to-day life and liability coverage will become more important. If a satellite fails for example, businesses relying on satellite services to function may want to claim for lost income or expenses incurred. Growth of space business has been characterized by a shift away from military and the public over to the private sector. Space activity was largely funded through government bodies such as NASA, the European Space Agency or the Japanese Space Agency. With recent estimates by the Satellite Industry Association placing cumulative satellite industry revenues at over $195.2 billion, a number of private companies are successfully entering the space industry and space application world. Governments and space agencies, which were ordering and building space hardware themselves, are now shifting towards buying services from private companies.
    [Show full text]
  • DB MF PW RCSTD 0314.Pdf
    DB/MF/PW/RCSTD/0314 10 things to do before you go Important 1. Check the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) travel Under the new travel directive from the European Union (EU), advice online at www.gov.uk/knowbeforeyougo. you are entitled to claim compensation from your airline if any of the following happen. 2. Get travel insurance and check that the cover is appropriate. 1. You are not allowed to board or your flight is cancelled. If you check-in on time but you are not allowed to board 3. Get a good guidebook and get to know the place you are because there are too many passengers for the number of going to. Find out about local laws and customs. seats available or your flight is cancelled, the airline operating the flight must offer you financial compensation. 4. Make sure you have a valid passport and any visas you need. 2. There are long delays. If you are delayed for two hours or more, the airline must 5. Check what vaccinations you need at least six weeks before offer you meals and refreshments, hotel accommodation you go. and communication facilities. If you are delayed for more than five hours, the airline must also offer to refund your 6. Check to see if you need to take extra health precautions ticket. (visit www.nhs.uk/travelhealth) 3. Your baggage is damaged, lost or delayed. 7. Make sure whoever you book your trip through is a If your checked-in baggage is damaged or lost by an EU member of the Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) airline, you must make a claim to the airline within seven or the Air Travel Organisers' Licensing scheme (ATOL).
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering Opens up All These ­Opportunities, and This Book Has All the Advice You Need to Get You There
    Are you looking for a more meaningful travel experience? Do you want to give back to the communities you visit, make a genuine connection with locals, meet like-minded travellers and build your skills? International volunteering opens up all these opportunities, and this book has all the advice you need to get you there. Much more than just a resource directory, Volunteer is packed with invaluable information and full-colour inspiration to get you planning your perfect short- or long-term volunteer A Traveller’s Guide to Making a Difference Around the World experience anywhere in the world – whether it’s monitoring sea turtles in Greece, helping set up handicraft businesses in Ghana or building community centres in Guatemala! Features: ~ Unique, user-friendly structure arranged by type of volunteering programme World the Around a Difference A Traveller’s Guide to Making ~ Over 170 organisations listed and reviewed ~ Dozens of seasoned volunteers share their experiences and top tips ~ Written by passionate, well-travelled Lonely Planet authors advised by a team of experts in the field ~ Fully illustrated with colour photographs of volunteers in action www.lonelyplanet.com US $19.99 UK £12.99 2nd Edition A Traveller’s Guide to Making a Difference Around the World Contents 01: INTERNATIONAL VOLUNTEERING: Taxation & National Insurance 83 06: STRUCTURED & SELF-FUNDING Choosing a Mutually Beneficial AN OvERviEW 8 House 83 VOLUNTEER PROGRAMMES 148 Placement 224 Why Volunteer? 9 Vehicle 86 How Do They Work? 149 Further Preparation 224 Kinds of
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance As a Risk Management Instrument for Energy Infrastructure Security and Resilience
    INSURANCE AS A RISK MANAGEMENT INSTRUMENT FOR ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AND RESILIENCE U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Insurance as a Risk Management Instrument for Energy Infrastructure Security and Resilience This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Department of Energy March 2013 Page ii of viii Insurance as a Risk Management Instrument for Energy Infrastructure Security and Resilience Preface This study examines key risks that the Nation‘s critical energy infrastructure is confronting and the ways in which the insurance industry can help manage these risks, including how it identifies, assesses, and manages them and their potential impacts. Today, weather-related incidents account for the majority of economic losses in the insurance industry as well as in the critical infrastructure sectors. In addition to the traditionally-recognized natural hazards, critical energy infrastructure faces significant emerging threats, including cybersecurity and space weather risks. While the United States has a large, mature insurance market, developing insurance mechanisms for protecting critical infrastructure from these emerging risks remains a significant challenge. The lack of historical data on the frequency and severity of these events, the changing nature of technologies impacted by them, as well as the inherent uncertainties posed by these risks make it difficult to accurately assess these emerging risks and develop proper insurance products. Insurance instruments can be a useful risk mitigation tool for critical infrastructure by encouraging resilience-enhancing investments and facilitating recovery after a disaster. However, due to the increased interdependencies across various critical infrastructure systems and sectors as well as the growing dependence of today‘s society on the critical infrastructure functions and advanced technologies, the question of insurability of critical infrastructure against emerging risks faces new challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • ARGO GROUP INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Toggle SGML Header (+) Section 1: 10-K (10-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 1-15259 ARGO GROUP INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda 98-0214719 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 110 Pitts Bay Road P.O. Box HM 1282 Pembroke HM08 Hamilton HM FX Bermuda Bermuda (Address of principal executive offices) (Mailing address) (441) 296-5858 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Security Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value of $1.00 per share NASDAQ Global Select Market Guarantee of Argo Group US, Inc. 6.500% Senior Notes due 2042 NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space and Launch Insurance: Current Market and Future Outlook
    Fourth Quarter 2002 Quarterly Launch Report 8 Commercial Space and Launch Insurance: Current Market and Future Outlook INTRODUCTION Third-party liability and government property insurances protect launch service providers and Since our last review of the space and launch their customers in the event of public injury or insurance industry (see "Update of the Space government property damage, respectively, and Launch Insurance Industry," 4th quarter, caused by launch or mission failure. In the 1998 Quarterly Launch Report), many changes United States, Federal Aviation Administration have occurred in the market. This report regulations require that commercial launch endeavors to examine the current market situa- licensees carry insurance to cover third-party tion and to explore what causes insurance mar- and government property damage claims that ket changes. We also examine how and why might result from launch activity. Because this market moves over time and discuss the these insurances are obtained from a different future outlook for space insurance. pool than the previous types of coverage, these insurances are beyond the scope of this report. For more information on licensee financial responsibility requirements, liability, and U.S. OVERVIEW OF SPACE INSURANCE liability risk-sharing regime, please see U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation The insurance market for the commercial Administration, Liability Risk-Sharing Regime space transportation industry is a global one, for U.S. Commercial Space Transportation: with satellite owners, satellite manufacturers, Study and Analysis, April 2002. launch services providers, insurance brokers, underwriters, financial institutions, reinsurers, Re-launch guarantees are a form of launch and government agents worldwide cooperating insurance in which a launch company acts as in order to coordinate an insurance package for an insurance provider to its customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Risk. Seeing the Opportunity. Annual Report & Accounts 2019 Report Annual
    Lancashire Holdings Limited Holdings Lancashire Holdings Limited Understanding risk. Seeing the opportunity. Annual Report 2019 & Accounts Annual Report & Accounts 2019 OUR PURPOSE IS TO… • Deliver bespoke risk solutions that protect our clients and support economies, businesses and communities in the face of uncertain loss events; • Manage our risk exposures and capital resources to generate returns for our investors; and • Support our people and work with our stakeholders; fostering a positive, sustainable and open business culture to the benefit of society. STRATEGIC REPORT Overview 1 Lancashire Group at a glance 8 Chairman’s statement 10 Business model Strategy GOVERNANCE 12 Chief Executive’s review 48 Chairman’s introduction 14 Our strategy 50 Board of Directors Performance 52 Principles for Sustainable Insurance 16 Financial review 55 Corporate governance report 18 Key performance indicators 59 Committee reports 20 Underwriting review 74 Directors’ Remuneration Report 24 Business review 96 Directors’ report 30 Enterprise risk management 100 Statement of Directors’ 33 Principal risks responsibilities 40 Engagement and sustainability FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 101 Independent auditor’s report 170 Shareholder information 107 Consolidated primary statements 171 Glossary 111 Accounting policies 176 Alternative performance measures 118 Risk disclosures 177 Contact information 143 Notes to the accounts FROM OUR BEGINNING 2012: Focusing our core portfolio In a year of flat demand and ample industry capacity, Lancashire optimised its 2009: Listing on the LSE portfolio, in order to better balance our exposure and Our listing on the main focus on more profitable market of the LSE was areas. We launched the built on four years of client-facing third-party strong performance capital reinsurance facility, and the indication of Saltire, and issued $130m of 2005: Inception pricing improvements senior debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Present Status and Future Plan on Vietnam's Optical Earth
    Study on Present Status and Future Plan on Vietnam’s Optical Earth Observation Satellite for Disaster and Climate Change Countermeasure Final Report February 2018 METI Study Team PADECO Co., Ltd Remote Sensing Technology Center of Japan Japan Space Systems NEC Corporation Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc. Japan Space Forum Study on Present Status and Future Plan on Vietnam’s Optical Earth Observation Satellite for Disaster and Climate Change Countermeasure Final Report Table of Contents Chapter 1 Study Background, Objectives and Scope 1.1 Background and Objectives ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Content and Method of Study ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.1 Present Status and Agenda on Vietnam’s Disaster and Climate Change .................... 1-3 1.2.2 Actual Utilization Status of Optical and Radar Satellite in Vietnam. ......................... 1-3 1.2.3 Preparation of Long Range Master Plan for Vietnam’s Satellite Remote Sensing ..... 1-3 1.2.4 Study on Next Generation Optical Satellite for Vietnam ............................................ 1-3 1.2.5 Study on Japan’s Investment and Loan Scheme. .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government Indemnification of the Commercial Space Launch Industry
    September 2009 RFF DP 09-38 More than a Wing and a Prayer: Government Indemnification of the Commercial Space Launch Industry Timothy J. Brennan, Carolyn Kousky, and Molly Macauley 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org DISCUSSION PAPER More Than a Wing and a Prayer: Government Indemnification of the Commercial Space Launch Industry Timothy J. Brennan, Carolyn Kousky, and Molly Macauley Abstract Using rockets to launch communications satellites and other spacecraft poses risks to the uninvolved public, including persons and property under the flight path of the launch vehicle. The federal government plays a pivotal technical role during the actual launch by carrying out certain risk-related procedures, thus causing third-party risk to be jointly produced by the company and the government. In addition, under the Commercial Space Launch Act, the government partially indemnifies commercial launch companies for third-party damages. We compare the indemnification policy to optimal liability rules under public-private co-production of risk. Under modest assumptions, shared liability created by the indemnification rules decreases the incentive of both parties to take care relative to the optimum. If care were observable, it would be preferable for the government to fully indemnify companies that take due care. The role of the government as an agent for third parties may qualify these findings. Key Words: government indemnification, liability, insurance, space transportation JEL Classification Numbers: L51, L98 © 2009 Resources for the Future. All rights reserved. No portion of this paper may be reproduced without permission of the authors. Discussion papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Liability Risk-Sharing Regime for U.S. Commercial Space Transportation
    April 2002 Liability Risk-Sharing Regime For U.S. Commercial Space Transportation: F TRA T O NS N P E O M R T T R A U.S. Department of T A I P O E N Transportation D Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transp ortation • Fed eral Avi atio n A dm ini str at ion • A ss oc ia te A dm i ni st ra to r fo r C o m m e r c ia l S p a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................ES-1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Study....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background of U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Risk Allocation ................................................. 1-3 1.2.1 Pre-1988 Liability Risk Management for Commercial Space Transportation........................... 1-3 1.2.2 1988 Congressional Hearings.................................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.2.1 Bases for the 1988 Commercial Space Launch Act Amendments............................. 1-4 1.2.2.2 State of the Insurance Market .................................................................................... 1-8 1.2.2.3 1988 Amendments to the Commercial Space Launch Act........................................
    [Show full text]