DOCSLIB.ORG

SSMO Shetland Inshore Brown & Velvet Crab and Scallop Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SSMO Shetland Inshore Brown & Velvet Crab and Scallop Fishery MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION On-Site Surveillance Visit - Report for SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery 4th Surveillance Audit September 2016 Certificate Code F-ACO-0086, -87, -88 Prepared For: The Shetland Shellfish Management Organisation Prepared By: Acoura Marine Authors: Rod Cappell, Bert Keus and Julian Addison BH (21/10/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery Assessment Data Sheet Fishery name SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery Species and Stock Shetland Inshore King Scallop (Pecten maximus), Velvet Crab (Necora puber) & Brown crab (Cancer pagurus) Date certified 14th March 2012 Date of expiry 13th March 2017 Surveillance level and type Normal Surveillance – On-site Date of surveillance audit W/C 26th September 2016 Surveillance stage (tick one) 1st Surveillance 2nd Surveillance 3rd Surveillance 4th Surveillance Other (expedited etc) Surveillance team Lead assessor: Rod Cappell Assessor(s): Bert Keus, Julian Addison CAB name Acoura Marine CAB contact details Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ Phone/Fax 0131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Billy Hynes Client contact details Address SSMO, Stewart Building, Lerwick, Shetland ZE2 9RW Phone/Fax 01595 693197 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Carole Laignel Page 2 of 22 PK (16/12/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Scope of Surveillance ............................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Aims of the Surveillance ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Certificate Holder Details ....................................................................................................... 5 2 Surveillance Process .................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Findings of the original assessment ...................................................................................... 6 2.2 Surveillance Activity ............................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Surveillance team details ................................................................................................ 8 2.2.2 Date & Location of surveillance audit .............................................................................. 9 2.2.3 Stakeholder consultation & meetings .............................................................................. 9 2.2.4 What was inspected ........................................................................................................ 9 2.2.5 Stakeholder Consultation ................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Surveillance Standards .......................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 MSC Standards, Requirements and Guidance used ...................................................... 9 2.3.2 Confirmation that destructive fishing practices or controversial unilateral exemptions have not been introduced ................................................................................................................ 9 3 Updated Fishery Background .................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Changes in the management system .................................................................................. 10 3.2 Changes in relevant regulations .......................................................................................... 10 3.3 Changes to personnel involved in science, management or industry ................................. 10 3.4 Changes to scientific base of information including stock assessments ............................. 10 3.5 Any developments or changes within the fishery which impact traceability or the ability to segregate between fish from the Unit of Certification (UoC) and fish from outside the UoC (non- certified fish) ...................................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 TAC and catch data ............................................................................................................. 12 3.7 Summary of Assessment Conditions ................................................................................... 13 4 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Condition 1 ........................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Condition 2 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.3 Condition 3 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.4 Condition 4 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.5 Condition 5 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.6 Condition 6 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.7 Condition 7 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.8 Condition 8 ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.9 Condition 9 ............................................................................................................................. 2 5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 5 5.1 Summary of findings .............................................................................................................. 5 6 References ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Page 3 of 22 PK (16/12/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Surveillance This report outlines the findings of the 4th Annual Surveillance of the SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery. The scope of the certified fishery and therefore of this surveillance is specified in the Units of Certification set out below: UoC 1 Species: King scallop (Pecten maximus) Stock: Shetland Inshore King scallop Geographical area: FAO Statistical Area 27, in EU waters - ICES Area IVa which is within 6nm of Shetland Harvest method: Scallop dredge (mobile gear) Client Group: The Shetland Shellfish Management Organisation (SSMO) UoC2 Species: Velvet crab (Necora puber) Stock: Shetland Inshore Velvet crab Geographical area: FAO Statistical Area 27, in EU waters - ICES Area IVa which is within 6nm of Shetland. Harvest method: Creel/pots (static gear) Client Group: The Shetland Shellfish Management Organisation (SSMO) UoC 3: Species: Brown crab (Cancer pagurus) Stock: Shetland Inshore Brown crab Geographical area: FAO Statistical Area 27, in EU waters - ICES Area IVa which is within 6nm of Shetland. Harvest method: Creel/pots (static gear) Client Group: The Shetland Shellfish Management Organisation (SSMO) 1.2 Aims of the Surveillance The purpose of the annual Surveillance Report is fourfold: 1. to establish and report on whether or not there have been any material changes to the circumstances and practices affecting the original complying assessment of the fishery; 2. to monitor the progress made to improve those practices that have been scored as below “good practice” (a score of 80 or above) but above “minimum acceptable practice” (a score of 60 or above) – as captured in any “conditions” raised and described in the Public Report and in the corresponding Action Plan drawn up by the client; 3. to monitor any actions taken in response to any (non-binding) “recommendations” made in the Public Report; 4. to re-score any Performance Indicators (PIs) where practice or circumstances have materially changed during the intervening year, focusing on those PIs that form the basis of any “conditions” raised. Please note: The primary focus of this surveillance audit is assess changes made in the previous year. For a complete picture, this report should be read in conjunction with the Public Certification Report for this fishery assessment which can be found here: Page 4 of 22 PK (16/12/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report SSMO Shetland inshore brown & velvet crab and scallop fishery https://www.msc.org/track-a-fishery/fisheries-in-the-program/certified/north-east-atlantic/shetland- inshore-crab-lobster-and-scallop/assessment-downloads-1/Public_Certification_Report_-_Final_- _ShetIS.pdf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Front Page Graphics.Cdr
    Ecological effects of the Lundy No-take Zone: The first five years (2003-2007) MG Hoskin, RA Coleman & L von Carlshausen March 2009 Final Report to Natural England, DEFRA & WWF-UK This report should be cited as: Hoskin, M.G., R.A Coleman, & L. von Carlshausen (2009). Ecological effects of the Lundy No-Take Zone: the first five years (2003-2007). Report to Natural England, DEFRA and WWF-UK. © Hoskin, M.G 1., R.A Coleman 2, & L. von Carlshausen 1 2009 1 Dr Miles Hoskin BSc (Hons), PhD, MIEEM Liz von Carlshausen BSc (Hons) Coastal & Marine Environmental Research (CMER) 2 Raleigh Place Falmouth Cornwall England Tel: +44 (0)1326 219 498 E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] 2 Professor Ross Coleman Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities (EICC) Marine Ecology Laboratories (A11) University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Tel: +61(0)2 9351 2039 Fax: +61(0)2 9351 6713 E-mail: [email protected] Web page: http://www.eicc.bio.usyd.edu.au Ecological effects of the Lundy NTZ: 2003 to 2007 Hoskin et al., 2009 Acknowledgements This work was made possible by funds from Natural England and match-funding from the ‘Financial Instruments for Fisheries Guidance’ (FIFG) grant scheme administered by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Additional funding or contributions in-kind were provided by the World Wildlife Fund (UK), the Esmée Fairburn Foundation, the Marine Biological Association of the UK, the University of Plymouth, the University of Sydney and Coastal & Marine Environmental Research (CMER).
    [Show full text]
  • Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE AGONISTIC BEHAVIOUR OF THE VELVET SWIMMING CRAB, LIOCARCINUS PUBER (L.) (BRACHYURA, PORTUNIDAE) Ian Philip Smith BSc (Wales) Department of Zoology, The University, Glasgow, G12 8QQ and University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, KA28 OEG A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Faculty of Science at the University of Glasgow, November 1990. ProQuest Number: 11007588 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007588 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Severn Estuary Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority
    FOOD CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL LTD Findhorn House, Dochfour Business Centre, Dochgarroch, Inverness, IV3 8GY, Scotland, UK Tel: +44 (0) 1463 223 039 Fax: +44 (0) 1463 246 380 www.foodcertint.com Severn Estuary Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority Final Report May 2011 Prepared For: Defra Prepared By: Food Certification International Ltd FOOD CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL LTD Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aim of this report .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Context and boundary areas ................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 IFCA responsibilities and objectives................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Local Authority boundaries .............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Report structure ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Consultation ............................................................................................................................ 4 2 Commercial fisheries ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Overview of landings and ports ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the British Stalk-Eyed Crustacea
    Go ygle Acerca de este libro Esta es una copia digital de un libro que, durante generaciones, se ha conservado en las estanterias de una biblioteca, hasta que Google ha decidido escanearlo como parte de un proyecto que pretende que sea posible descubrir en linea libros de todo el mundo. Ha sobrevivido tantos anos como para que los derechos de autor hayan expirado y el libro pase a ser de dominio publico. El que un libro sea de dominio publico significa que nunca ha estado protegido por derechos de autor, o bien que el periodo legal de estos derechos ya ha expirado. Es posible que una misma obra sea de dominio publico en unos paises y, sin embargo, no lo sea en otros. Los libros de dominio publico son nuestras puertas hacia el pasado, suponen un patrimonio historico, cultural y de conocimientos que, a menudo, resulta dificil de descubrir. Todas las anotaciones, marcas y otras senales en los margenes que esten presentes en el volumen original apareceran tambien en este archivo como testimonio del largo viaje que el libro ha recorrido desde el editor hasta la biblioteca y, finalmente, hasta usted. Normas de uso Google se enorgullece de poder colaborar con distintas bibliotecas para digitalizar los materiales de dominio publico a fin de hacerlos accesibles a todo el mundo. Los libros de dominio publico son patrimonio de todos, nosotros somos sus humildes guardianes. No obstante, se trata de un trabajo caro. Por este motivo, y para poder ofrecer este recurso, hemos tornado medidas para evitar que se produzca un abuso por parte de terceros con fines comerciales, y hemos incluido restricciones tecnicas sobre las solicitudes automatizadas.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Independent Approaches To
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Summer 8-1-2019 Comparing Independent Approaches to Estimate Age at Size of the Jonah Crab (Cancer borealis): Corroborating Gastric Mill Band Counts as a Direct Aging Method Carlton Huntsberger University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Huntsberger, Carlton, "Comparing Independent Approaches to Estimate Age at Size of the Jonah Crab (Cancer borealis): Corroborating Gastric Mill Band Counts as a Direct Aging Method" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3057. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3057 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARING INDEPENDENT APPROACHES TO ESTIMATE AGE AT SIZE OF THE JONAH CRAB (CANCER BOREALIS): CORROBORATING GASTRIC MILL BAND COUNTS AS A DIRECT AGING METHOD By Carlton Huntsberger B.S. Roger Williams University, 2012 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Marine Biology) The Graduate School The University of Maine August 2019 Advisory Committee: Richard Wahle, Research Professor, School of Marine Science, Advisor Yong Chen, Professor, School of Marine Science Raouf Kilada, Chief Research Officer, OceAge Copyright 2019 Carlton Huntsberger All Rights Reserved ii COMPARING INDEPENDENT APPROACHES TO ESTIMATE AGE AT SIZE OF THE JONAH CRAB (CANCER BOREALIS): CORROBORATING GASTRIC MILL BAND COUNTS AS A DIRECT AGING METHOD By Carlton Huntsberger Thesis Advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Shellfish Facts
    FISH AND SHELLFISH FACTS Haddock In the North Sea, haddock occur mainly in the northern and central areas, but can be found as far south as the Humber 1 Estuary. At the beginning of the 20th century they were also abundant in the southern North Sea. Young haddock spend the first few months of life in the upper water layers before moving to the seabed. Results from early genetic studies on haddock have suggested there could be different populations within the North Sea. Haddock feed mainly on worms, small molluscs, sea urchins, brittle stars with Norway pout being the most common fish eaten in the more northerly areas, whereas sandeels are more important in the central North Sea. Cod Cod occur mainly in the northern and central areas. New born cod are distributed over a large part of this area, with high 2concentrations off the Jutland coast. By the time they reach five years, all cod are mature. Cod do not usually browse for food on the bottom but are active feeders. By weight, around three quarters of the food of all sizes of cod consists of fish and crustaceans. The rest is made up of small quantities of molluscs and worms. As they grow, cod eat an increasing amount of fish, Sandeel, Norway pout, whiting, herring, dab and cod themselves. Herring During daytime, herring shoals remain close to the sea bottom or in deep water. At dusk they move towards the surface and 3 disperse over a wide area. Some herring mature and spawn at two years of age, but most are three or four before they spawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision Draft
    Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments WESTERN ASTURIAS OCTOPUS TRAPS FISHERY OF ARTISANAL COFRADÍAS Public domain illustration from: Comingio Merculiano (1845-1915) PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT REPORT 15th June 2021 Bureau Veritas Certification Holding SAS Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) Contact: [email protected] Assessment team in the PCDR Angel F. González González, Gonzalo Macho Rivero, Gemma Quílez Asociación de armadores de la pesquería de pulpo con certificado Fishery client de sostenibilidad (ARPESOS) Assessment Type First Reassessment 1 Contents 1 Contents __________________________________________________________________________ 2 2 Glossary ___________________________________________________________________________ 4 3 Executive summary __________________________________________________________________ 5 4 Report details ______________________________________________________________________ 8 4.1 Authorship and peer review details ________________________________________________________ 8 4.2 Version details ________________________________________________________________________ 10 5 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview _______________________________ 11 5.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ____________________________________________ 11 5.1.1 Unit(s) of Assessment __________________________________________________________________________ 11 5.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification __________________________________________________________________________ 12 5.2 Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 22C - Sizewell Benthic Ecology Characterisation
    The Sizewell C Project 6.3 Volume 2 Main Development Site Chapter 22 Marine Ecology and Fisheries Appendix 22C - Sizewell Benthic Ecology Characterisation Revision: 1.0 Applicable Regulation: Regulation 5(2)(a) PINS Reference Number: EN010012 May 2020 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Sizewell benthic ecology characterisation TR348 Sizewell benthic ecology NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page 1 of 122 characterisation TR348 Sizewell benthic ecology NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page 2 of 122 characterisation Table of contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 10 1 Context ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Purpose of the report................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Thematic coverage ................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Geographic coverage ............................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Data and information sources ................................................................................................... 17 1.4.1 BEEMS intertidal survey .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Marine Ecology and Fisheries
    Carlingford Ferry 7 MARINE ECOLOGY AND FISHERIES 7.1 Benthic Ecology This chapter assesses the potential impacts on bethnic ecology in addition to providing recommendations for mitigation measures related to the proposed ferry development connecting Greenore Point Co. Louth in the Republic of Ireland with Greencastle in County Down, Northern Ireland. The development consists of the construction of ferry berthing installations at Greenore and Greencastle, mainly within the intertidal and shallow sub-tidal areas at both locations. In addition, a hardstand vehicle queuing area would be located above the high-tide mark at each site. 7.1.1 Sensitivities within the benthic study area 7.1.1.1 Greenore Site On behalf of RPS, Aquatic Services Unit (ASU) undertook a survey of the benthos and marine mammals in the area of a proposed ferry development at Carlingford Lough Co. Down. The proposed landfall at Greenore, Co. Louth is located on the eastern side of Greenore Point, in Co. Louth. This location is within two protected areas – Carlingford Lough proposed NHA (IE000452) and Carlingford Shore SAC (IE002306). The Carlingford Shore SAC and Carlingford Lough pNHA comprise the entire southern shoreline of Carlingford Lough and continue to the southern part of the Carlingford Peninsula. Although the principal conservation interests of the area lie in the shingle and sandy shoreline habitats, the site also includes intertidal sand and mudflats and saltmarsh communities. The area has very good examples of annual driftline vegetation and perennial vegetation of stony banks and shingle, which could potentially extend across the location of the proposed development as these are known to occur between Greenore and Cooley Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioural and Physiological Studies of Fighting in the Velvet Swimming Crab, Necora Puber (L.) (Brachyura, Portunidae)
    Behavioural and Physiological Studies of Fighting in the Velvet Swimming Crab, Necora puber (L.) (Brachyura, Portunidae) by Kathleen Elaine Thorpe B.Sc. (Leicester) Department of Zoology University of Glasgow A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Science at the University of Glasgow © K. E. Thorpe August 1994 ProQuest Number: 13834084 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13834084 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 'ft-M 113 ^ i P -I Irsssssr UNIVERSITY C( I I { library _ Dedicated to the memory of my Dad, Ian Grenville Thorpe. THAT'S THE WHOLE PROBLEM WITH SCIENCE. 'fCU'VE GOT A BUNCH OF EMPIRICISTS TRT1NG TO DESCRIBE THINGS OF UNIMAGINABLE WONDER. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, sincere thanks and great respect are due to my supervisors, Felicity Huntingford and Alan Taylor, for their help, advice and enthusiastic encouragement throughout the course of this work. Special thanks go to Felicity for constructive criticism, discussion and guidance during the preparation of this thesis, and also for a welcomed source of pocket money.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Pagurus) and Production Potential for Passive Fisheries in Dutch Offshore Windfarms
    Ecology of the brown crab (Cancer pagurus) and production potential for passive fisheries in Dutch offshore windfarms Author(s): L. Tonk and M.J.C. Rozemeijer Wageningen University & Research report C064/19A Ecology of the brown crab (Cancer pagurus) and production potential for passive fisheries in Dutch offshore wind farms Author(s): L. Tonk and M.J.C. Rozemeijer Publication date: 10/07/2019 Wageningen Marine Research Yerseke, July 2019 CONFIDENTIAL NO Wageningen Marine Research report number C064/19A TKI Project Win-Wind: making offshore wind farms winning for society, project number: TEWZ118012 Tonk, L. and Rozemeijer, M.J.C. 2019. Ecology of the brown crab (Cancer pagurus) and production potential for passive fisheries in Dutch offshore wind farms. Wageningen, Wageningen Marine Research (University & Research centre), Wageningen Marine Research report number C064/19A, 49 pp.; 3 tab.; 86 ref. Keywords: Cancer pagurus, offshore windfarm, passive fisheries. Client: TKI Wind op Zee T.a.v.: De Directie Postbus 24100 3502 MC Utrecht The Netherlands BAS code (applied to projects funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs (EZ, previously known as EL&I) Dit rapport is gratis te downloaden van https://doi.org/10.18174/496176 Wageningen Marine Research verstrekt geen gedrukte exemplaren van rapporten. Wageningen Marine Research is ISO 9001:2015 certified. Photo cover: Image from http://www.dutchcrownseafood.com. © 2016 Wageningen Marine Research Wageningen UR Wageningen Marine Research The Management of Wageningen Marine Research is not responsible for resulting institute of Stichting Wageningen damage, as well as for damage resulting from the application of results or Research is registered in the Dutch research obtained by Wageningen Marine Research, its clients or any claims traderecord nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Asturias Octopus Traps Fishery of Artisanal Cofradías
    Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments WESTERN ASTURIAS OCTOPUS TRAPS FISHERY OF ARTISANAL COFRADÍAS Public domain illustration from: Comingio Merculiano (1845-1915) ANNOUNCEMENT COMMENT DRAFT REPORT NOVEMBER 2020 Bureau Veritas Certification Holding SAS Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) Contact: [email protected] ; macarena.garcia@ bureauveritas.com Angel F. González González, Gonzalo Macho Rivero , José Assessment team in the ACDR Ríos and Macarena García Asociación de armadores de la pesquería de pulpo con Fishery client certificado de sostenibilidad (ARPESOS) Assessment Type First Reassessment 1 Contents 1 Contents __________________________________________________________________________ 2 2 Glossary ___________________________________________________________________________ 4 3 Executive summary __________________________________________________________________ 5 4 Report details ______________________________________________________________________ 7 4.1 Authorship and peer review details ________________________________________________________ 7 4.2 Version details _________________________________________________________________________ 9 5 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview _______________________________ 10 5.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ____________________________________________ 10 5.1.1 Unit(s) of Assessment __________________________________________________________________________ 10 5.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification __________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]