G20090007/Oedo-2009-0007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

G20090007/Oedo-2009-0007 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com R Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 126 (2003) 11^30 www.elsevier.com/locate/jvolgeores Volcanic and seismic hazards at a proposed nuclear power site in central Java Alexander R. McBirney a;Ã, Leonello Serva b, M. Guerra b, Charles B. Connor c a Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA b APAT, Italian Agency for Environment Protection and Technical Services, Via Vitaliano Brancati, 48, 00144 Roma, Italy c Department of Geology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, SCA 528, Tampa, FL 33620-5201, USA Received 1 February 2003; accepted 16 March 2003 Abstract A nuclear power plant site has been proposed near the base of Mount Muria, a long-dormant volcano in Indonesia. Over a period of eight years the volcanic and seismic hazards were investigated, first by the contractor and later by a joint team of Indonesian geologists and consultants to the International Atomic Energy Agency. In order to assess the risk posed by a large volcano for which there is no record of historical eruptions, it was necessary to determine the age of the last activity by geological and geochronological means and to deduce from this whether the volcano posed a credible risk. Similarly, because there was no adequate record of seismic activity, the seismic hazards were investigated mainly by geological, geomorphological, and geophysical methods that identified and characterized potential seismogenic sources related to the volcano or tectonic movements (i.e. active/capable faults). Muria Volcano has not erupted since about two thousand years ago, but the last activity was sufficiently recent to rule out any assumption that the volcano is extinct. Detailed studies indicated that the proposed site may be vulnerable to the effects of air-borne tephra, pyroclastic flows and surges, debris flows, lahars, and opening of new vents. A more serious factor, however, was the poor geotechnical properties of the foundation material that required a careful analysis of the seismic hazards. Although the project was suspended, the study proved useful, because it provided an opportunity to develop procedures and techniques that could be applied in similar studies elsewhere. ß 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: volcanic hazards; nuclear power plants; Indonesia 1. Introduction evaluate safety studies for what was to be Indo- nesia’s ¢rst nuclear power plant. Because the site 1.1. Background of study is in a densely populated region on the north coast of Java near one of the world’s major chains In 1991 the Indonesian government invited the of active volcanoes (Fig. 1), the primary concern International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to of the safety studies was the potential hazards of * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (A.R. McBirney). 0377-0273 / 03 / $ ^ see front matter ß 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0377-0273(03)00114-8 VOLGEO 2620 1-7-03 12 A.R. McBirney et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 126 (2003) 11^30 volcanism and seismicity. A panel of geologists, adapted for use at other projects of this kind. volcanologists, geophysicists, and engineers re- The result was a set of guidelines laid out in the viewed the geological studies and found a number 1997 IAEA document ‘Volcanoes and associated of open issues critical to the acceptability of the topics in relation to nuclear power plant siting’ proposed site. Additional studies were recom- (McBirney and Godoy, 2003). The guidelines are mended to address these concerns, and with similar to others that had already been prepared time, the panel took on an increasing role in the for earthquakes, tsunamis, and other natural haz- investigation until it had a team of eleven experts ards. A preliminary version was distributed to all from various nations working in close coopera- appropriate members of the United Nations, and tion with Indonesian scientists. recommended changes and additions from experts Having no established precedent for assessing in several of these countries were incorporated volcanic hazards under these conditions, the into the ¢nal version. Our purpose here is to team developed a plan of study that could be show how this approach was followed in the Fig. 1. Satellite image showing the location of the proposed nuclear power plant (NPP) with respect to Muria Volcano. VOLGEO 2620 1-7-03 A.R. McBirney et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 126 (2003) 11^30 13 case of the proposed Indonesian nuclear power plant. The investigation was concerned with a variety of possible hazards, but only those associated with volcanism and seismicity are discussed here. The data we report are taken from unpublished documents produced by BATAN (the Atomic En- ergy Commission of Indonesia), NEWJEC (a con- Fig. 2. The acceptable hazard varies greatly depending on sulting company) and NTT (a team of Indonesian the application. Critical facilities like nuclear power plants scientists from universities and public institutions require the largest margin of safety. formed with the speci¢c goal of de¢ning the seis- mic and volcanic hazards at the Muria site). ments in hazardous areas to monitor volcanoes, 1.2. Volcanic and seismic hazards at nuclear because the possibility of losing them is usually facilities acceptable. Nuclear facilities occupy the opposite end of the spectrum (Fig. 2). The probabilities of Evaluations of seismic and volcanic hazards af- volcanic eruptions or earthquakes resulting in loss fecting nuclear facilities di¡er in several ways of control of a nuclear plant, or in a release of from other types of hazard assessments. The radionuclides into the environment, must, of most important di¡erence is that they are focused course, be very low, on the order of 1038 to on hazards at a speci¢c locality, in this case a 1036 per year, depending on the longevity of the proposed nuclear power plant site, rather than facility. Note that at such low probabilities, un- on a general region near a particular volcano or certainties in assigning values to certain parame- fault. In addition, one must consider volcanic and ters, such as the frequency of volcanic eruptions, seismic hazards together, rather than indepen- are very high. Estimates of hazards and risk based dently, because they are closely linked. Seismicity on a small number of events, either because these is associated with most volcanic terrains and can events are very infrequent or because they have induce mass movement on the slopes of the vol- not been recognized as such, are highly uncertain cano, even without renewed magmatism. Because (Von Mises, 1957). Conversely, because the geo- the assessment must consider the total hazard and logic record is usually incomplete, the small frac- risk, it must span both of these disciplines. tion of volcanic and seismic events that have been The success of volcanic hazard assessments de- preserved in the geologic record may drive most pends on the quality of basic geologic research, of the risk analysis. numerical modelling of volcanic processes, and In its study of the Indonesian site, the team was the investigators’ experience with a great diversity not able to deal successfully with all of these is- of eruptive activities. Similarly, seismic hazard as- sues. Nevertheless, the lessons learned there are sessment requires a basic understanding of the worth considering, in the hope that future assess- regional tectonics, local fault characteristics, and ments will avoid some of the pitfalls we encoun- site conditions. In our case, the team was faced tered. with using information gathered by other groups, often with di¡ering objectives. This inevitably 1.3. Plan of investigation complicated the task of providing adequate as- sessment of long-term geologic hazard rates. Hazards were considered on all scales ranging Such complications manifest themselves in the from the broad regional tectonic setting to condi- analysis as increased uncertainty. tions in the immediate vicinity of the site. As out- The level of acceptable risk depends, of course, lined in McBirney and Godoy, 2003, the goal of on the nature of the exposed facilities. For exam- the regional studies was to identify all Quaternary ple, one does not hesitate to place scienti¢c instru- volcanic and seismic phenomena within a radius VOLGEO 2620 1-7-03 14 A.R. McBirney et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 126 (2003) 11^30 of at least 150 km from the site on Muria Pen- motectonic model for interpreting the seismicity insula. near the site; (3) compile a record of activity for Because of its great geological interest, the In- all active volcanoes and faults within a radius of donesian Arc has been the subject of countless 150 km from the site; and (4) identify time-strati- volcanological and seismological studies the re- graphic units and determine the ages of the Plio- sults of which are available in publications dating cene and Quaternary volcanic deposits having a back more than a century. With so much infor- regional extent of 100 km2 or more. mation already compiled, much of the research These regional studies were followed by inves- required on the regional scale could be accom- tigations on a more detailed scale of conditions in plished by a review of the existing literature. Un- the vicinity of the proposed site. The potential fortunately, however, these resources are mainly hazards were grouped into two categories depend- of a general nature and are not adequate for ing on whether or not they could be mitigated by many aspects of a detailed study of the present economically feasible design measures: (A) vol- kind. It was necessary, therefore, to acquire addi- canic or seismic hazards that adversely a¡ect the tional information directly related to the project.
Recommended publications
  • Source to Surface Model of Monogenetic Volcanism: a Critical Review
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Source to surface model of monogenetic volcanism: a critical review I. E. M. SMITH1 &K.NE´ METH2* 1School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Small-scale volcanic systems are the most widespread type of volcanism on Earth and occur in all of the main tectonic settings. Most commonly, these systems erupt basaltic magmas within a wide compositional range from strongly silica undersaturated to saturated and oversatu- rated; less commonly, the spectrum includes more siliceous compositions. Small-scale volcanic systems are commonly monogenetic in the sense that they are represented at the Earth’s surface by fields of small volcanoes, each the product of a temporally restricted eruption of a composition- ally distinct batch of magma, and this is in contrast to polygenetic systems characterized by rela- tively large edifices built by multiple eruptions over longer periods of time involving magmas with diverse origins. Eruption styles of small-scale volcanoes range from pyroclastic to effusive, and are strongly controlled by the relative influence of the characteristics of the magmatic system and the surface environment. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. Small-scale basaltic magmatic systems characteris- hazards associated with eruptions, and this is tically occur at the Earth’s surface as fields of small particularly true where volcanic fields are in close monogenetic volcanoes. These volcanoes are the proximity to population centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Rocks Rocks Formed from Lava That Crystallizes at the Surface Vulcan – God of Fire
    http://coloradogeologicalsurvey.org /colorado-geology/timescale/ Concrete Aggregates- Criteria Igneous Rocks Adapted from Brunkel (2012) Two Types of Igneous Rocks Extrusive, or Volcanic rocks Rocks formed from lava that crystallizes at the surface Vulcan – god of fire Intrusive, or Plutonic rocks Rocks formed from magma that crystallizes at depth Pluto – god of the underworld Types of Lava Rhyolite Felsic lava 800°-1000°C Lower temp and higher silica = more viscous Types of Lava Types of Basalt Mafic Magma Flood Pahoehoe Aa Pillow Types of Lava Andesitic Intermediate between basalt and rhyolite Felsic or Sialic Intermediate Mafic Magma Magma Magma Igneous Textures Factors affecting crystal size & texture: Rate of cooling Fast rate forms many small crystals Very fast rate forms glass Amount of silica (SiO2) present Amount of dissolved gases (volatiles) Types of Igneous Texture Definite Extrusive textures: Glassy Aphanitic – Fine Grained Vesicular - Holey Pyroclastic – Fragments Porphyritic – Fine & Coarse Grained Definite Intrusive textures: Phaneritic – Coarse Grained Pegmatitic – Very Coarse Grained Porphyritic – Fine & Coarse Grained Divergent Boundaries Newest crust material being formed Continent-Ocean convergence Global Pattern of Volcanism Extrusive Igneous Volcanic Erupts at the surface of the Earth Magma/lava cools very RAPIDLY, crystals do not have time to form, very fine grained crystal structure Aphanitic texture (Fine Grained) Rapid rate of cooling of lava or shallow magma Very small crystals May contain
    [Show full text]
  • Western Aleutian Islands -Alaska I
    Geologic Reconnaissance of Semisopochnoi Island 'Western Aleutian Islands -Alaska i By ROBERT R. COATS ..INVESTIGATIONS OF ALASKAN VOLCANOES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1028-O > Prepared in cooperation with the Office, t Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. Price $1.25 (paper cover) PREFACE In October 1945 the War Department (now Department of the Army) requested the Geological Survey to undertake a program of volcano investigations in the Aleutian Islands-Alaska Penin­ sula area. The first field studies, under the general direction of G. D. Robinson, were made during the years 1946-48. The re­ sults of the first year's field, laboratory, and library work were hastily assembled as two administrative reports, and most of these data have been revised for publication in Geological Sur­ vey Bulletin 1028. Part of the early work was published in 1950 in Bulletin 974-B, "Volcanic Activity in the Aleutian Arc," and in 1951 in Bulletin 989-A, "Geology of Buldir Island, Aleutian Islands, Alaska," both by Robert R. Coats. During the years 1949-54 additional fieldwork was carried out under the direction of H. A. Powers. Unpublished results of the early work and all of the later studies are being incorporated as parts of Bulletin 1028. The geological investigations covered by this report were re­ connaissance. The factual information presented is believed to be accurate, but many of the tentative interpretations and conclu­ sions will be modified as the investigations continue and knowl­ edge grows.
    [Show full text]
  • Eruption Patterns of Parasitic Volcanoes Izumi Yokoyama
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 58, 3, 2015, S0327; doi:10.4401/ag-6557 Eruption patterns of parasitic volcanoes Izumi Yokoyama The Japan Academy, Ueno Park, Tokyo, Japan Article history Received April 28, 2014; accepted May 28, 2015. Subject classification: Parasitic vents, Parasitic eruptions, Shear fracture model, Twin parasitic vents, Various patterns of parasitic eruptions. ABSTRACT both presently and in the historical record, necessarily Eruption patterns of parasitic volcanoes are discussed in order to study have not been recorded in detail. Therefore, the pres- their correlation to the activities of their parental polygenetic volcanoes. ent author’s discussion is inevitably limited to exempli- The distribution density of parasitic vents on polygenetic volcanoes is di- fication of specific active volcanoes. There are examples versified, probably corresponding to the age and structure of parental vol- of exceptionally large magnitude parasitic eruptions canoes. Describing existing parasitic cones contextually in relation to emanating from small parasitic vents. In the 1914 erup- parental volcanoes is as indispensable as collecting observational data of tion of Sakurajima volcano, Japan, the two parasitic their actual formations. In the present paper, spatial distributions of par- vents were extraordinarily vigorous and ejected lava asitic cones are classified tentatively into the following three categories: in- over a volume of about 2 km3 for about 25 days. dividually radial, directionally radial and annular determined according Empirically we know that parasitic vents are usu- to feature’s placement around the central axes of the parental volcanoes. ally monogenetic i.e. they would no more erupt after The formations of parasitic vents are discussed from the standpoint of their cycles of activity though the observation ages are material mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Volcanic Hazards
    Volcanic Hazards - Overview I. REVIEW OF VOLCANIC PROCESSES A. Basic Terminology 1. Igneous Rocks- a rock (or agglomeration of one or more minerals) that results from the cooling of magma, or molten rock. As the magma cools, minerals crystallize from the molten rock. 2. Magma - molten or hot liquid rock, originates beneath the earth's surface (up to 120 miles beneath), composed of elements found in silicate minerals, water vapor, and gases. 3. Lava - magma that is extruded onto the earth's surface via volcanic eruptions (hot magma is confined at depth beneath surface, relatively lighter than confining rock, rises upward, may eventually erupt onto earth surface). 4. Extrusive Igneous Rocks or Volcanic Ig. Rocks - rocks which solidify from lava (or were extruded onto earth's surface) 5. Intrusive Igneous Rocks or Plutonic Ig. Rocks - rocks which solidify from magma beneath the earth's surface. B. Volcanism 1. Volcanism- process by which magma, gas, and water are released from the interior of the earth. Volcanic processes and eruptions often result in the spewing and build up of volcanic material about a volcanic center, constructing a volcanic edifice commonly referred to as a volcano. a. Status of Volcanic History (1) Active: volcano observed in eruption during historic time (2) Dormant: volcano with no historic record however show evidence of geologically recent activity (a) volcanic deposits (b) hydrothermal activity (3) Extinct: no historic record and no evidence of geologically recent activity 2. Nature of Volcanic Activity a. Style of volcanism; i.e. Explosive vs. Quiescent is determined by the composition of the magma, its temperature, and amount of dissolved gases contained within.
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Death in the Shadow of Vesuvius
    Life and death in the shadow of Vesuvius The following Educator’s Guide for A Day in Pompeii was designed to promote personalized learning and reinforce classroom curriculum. The worksheets and classroom activities are appropriate for various grade levels and apply to proficiency standards in social studies, language arts, reading, math, science and the arts. Students are encouraged to use their investigation skills to describe, explain, analyze, summarize, record and evaluate the information presented in the exhibit. The information gathered can then be used as background research for the various Classroom Connections that relate to grade level academic content standards. In order to best suit you and your classroom needs, this Educator’s Guide has been broken up into the following areas: A. Pre-visit Information Background Information i. Vocabulary ii. Volcanism 1. Types of Volcanoes 2. Advantages of Volcanoes iii. Mt. Vesuvius iv. Pompeii Classroom Connections B. Museum Visit Information Exhibit Walk-through Exhibit Student Worksheet C. Post-visit Information Classroom Connections i. Language Arts/Social Studies ii. Science iii. Fine Arts Further Readings Ohio and National Standards PRE-VISIT INFORMATION Vocabulary Archaeologist – A scientist who studies artifacts of the near and distant past in order to develop a picture of how people lived in earlier cultures and societies. These artifacts include physical remains, such as graves, tools and pottery. Artifact – A hand-made object or the remains of an object that is characteristic of an earlier time or culture, such as an object found at an archaeological excavation. Caldera – A cauldron-like depression in the ground created by the collapse of land after a volcanic eruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitkin Island Alaska
    Geology of Great Sitkin Island Alaska By FRANK S. SIMON$ adDONALD E. MTHEWSON INVESTIGATIONS OF ALASKAN VOLCANOES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1028-B Prepared in coofieratio7s with the Ofice, Chief of Engineers, U.S. Amy !yqr,:' '~~pfi,~~~1: "i 1' r :+ Sx 'ejt12 S'T U.j-jOh 4:; l. .r<, k.iIY OFFICE: 'BOX 653 -'j,.,i:.. t. b-L.4:K& - -- UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON I t 955 UMTED 'STATESDEPARTMENT OF -011 Mc~Y*s.etstarJI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. L. Wrrtber* mectm PREFACE In Wber 1945 the War Departmmt (now Deparbent of the &my) requwtd the *logical Survey to undertrike a program of volcano inwatiigattions in the Aleutian Islands-Alaska Peninda area. The fht field gtudiw, under general direction of G.D. Robinson, were begun ae soon as weather permitted in the spring of 1946. The reaalta of the ii& ydsfield, labratmy, and library work mw mrnbled hastily as two administrative reporb. Part of the data was published in 1950 in Geologicad SmeyBulletin 974-B, Volcanic activity in the Aleutian arc, by Robert R. Coats. The remahder of the data hm been revised for publication in Bullatin 1028. The geologic and gsophysid invwtigationa oo~dby this report were reconnaissance. The factual information presented is believed to be accurate, but many of the tentative interpretations and conch- sions will be modified as the inv&igstions continue and howledga Pm The inadgations of 1948 were supported almost entirely by the Militmy Intelligence Division of the Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army, The Geological Smey is indebted to the Office, Chief of Engineers, for its early mgnition of the value of gsolagie studies in the Aleutian region, which made this mport possible, and for it9 continuing aapport.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Chalcophile Element Processing Beneath
    University of Birmingham Chalcophile element processing beneath a continental arc stratovolcano Cox, Daniel; Watt, Sebastian F.L.; Jenner, Frances E.; Hastie, Alan R.; Hammond, Samantha J. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.017 License: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Cox, D, Watt, SFL, Jenner, FE, Hastie, AR & Hammond, SJ 2019, 'Chalcophile element processing beneath a continental arc stratovolcano', Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 522, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.017 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 01/07/2019 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcano Load Control on Dyke Propagation and Vent Distribution: Insights from Analogue Modeling M
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, B03401, doi:10.1029/2008JB005653, 2009 Volcano load control on dyke propagation and vent distribution: Insights from analogue modeling M. Kervyn,1 G. G. J. Ernst,1 B. van Wyk de Vries,2 L. Mathieu,2,3 and P. Jacobs1 Received 25 February 2008; revised 17 December 2008; accepted 9 January 2009; published 3 March 2009. [1] The spatial distribution of eruptive vents around volcanoes can be complex and evolve as a volcano grows. Observations of vent distribution at contrasting volcanoes, from scoria cones to large shields, show that peripheral eruptive vents concentrate close to the volcano base. We use analogue experiments to explore the control of volcano load on magma ascent and on vent location. Results show that the local loading stress field favors eruption of rising magma away from the volcano summit if a central conduit is not established or is blocked. Two sets of scaled experiments are developed with contrasting rheological properties to analyze similarities and differences in simulated magma rise below a volcano: (1) Golden syrup (magma analogue) is injected into a sand-plaster mixed layer (crust analogue) under a cone; (2) water or air (magma analogues) is injected into gelatin under a sand cone. Rising dykes approaching the cone stress field are stopped by the load compressive stress. With continued intrusion, dyke overpressure builds up; dykes extend laterally until their tips are able to rise vertically again and to erupt in the flank or at the base of the volcano. Lateral offset of the extrusion point relative to the edifice summit depends on substratum thickness, volcano slope, and dyke overpressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanological Observations in East Africa
    VOLCANOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS IN EAST AFRICA. II.-KILIMANJARO: KIBO'S FUMAROLIC ACTIVITY IN 1942-43. By J. J. RICHARD. Contents. 1. Introduction. 2. The Caldera of K!bo and its Eruption Cone in the Past, according to the Literature. 3. Kibo's Fumarolic Activity in 1942-43. 4. Conclusion .. 5. Literature. 1. INTRODUCTION. Kibo, the highest, the youngest and best preserved volcanic cone of Kilimanjaro (Fig. 1) of which Shira and Mawensi (Fig. 2) represent the older main vents, contains, sunk in its white shining glaciers, a two• kilometre-wide caldera caused by subsidence, inside which is a secondary eruption cone, with its own small crater. While in the past, attempts to conquer the summit of Kibo, Kaiser Wilhelm Point, about 5,950 m. high (Klute's figure) were numerous, mountaineers rarely tried to descend into the caldera and visit the crater. Mostertz (1930), in his list of ascents of Kibo, records, since R. Meyer with L. Purtscheller first reached the top in 1889, up to 1928, 47, of which 15 were successful, but does not mention any visit to the crater itself. The amount of energy and the time required to climb the highest point, form the main reasons for this apparent forgetfulness. From the summit, only a faint black line, situated in the northern part of the caldera, the crater rim, about 500 m. wide and the northern upward inner slopes, are seen above a rather flatshaped broad cone, just below the great northern ice barrier or eastern extension leading to the Credner, Drygalski and Penck glaciers (Fig. 3 and map).
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 4: Volcanoes Factsheet for Teachers
    Lesson 4: Volcanoes Factsheet for teachers Purpose of Lesson There are approximately 500 active volcanoes in the world; on average 25 of these erupt each year. In this lesson pupils will learn that volcanoes are another type of mountain, and just like other mountains, they come in different shapes and sizes. While fold mountains, fault block mountains and dome mountains are located within the body of a tectonic plate, volcanoes are primarily (but not exclusively) located on the boundary between two tectonic plates. In its simplest terms a volcano is formed when magma penetrates the Earth’s crust. This magma then cools and hardens to form solid rock, creating a mountain. This lesson will examine different types of plate boundary. It will also name the key features of a composite volcano in cross section. Vocabulary This lesson uses the following geographical terms. These should be used and explained to pupils as the lesson is taught. Some of these terms have already been taught in Lesson 3. Core, mantle, crust These are the main layers of the Earth. Molten rock Rocks that are in a liquid form. Viscous Viscosity is a measure of how thick or thin a liquid is. The higher the viscosity, the thicker the liquid; the lower the viscosity, the thinner the liquid. If a liquid is described as viscous it is thick. The mantle is viscous. Magma Magma is molten rock from the mantle. Magma is within the surface of the Earth. Magma becomes lava only once it flows out over the surface land, for example with a volcano.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies of Taapaca and Parinacota Volcanoes, Northern Chile
    Differentiation regimes in the Central Andean magma systems: case studies of Taapaca and Parinacota volcanoes, Northern Chile DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades "Doctor rerum naturalium" der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen im Promotionsprogramm Geowissenschaften / Geographie der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Magdalena Banaszak aus Poznań/Polen Göttingen 2014 Betreuungsausschuss: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Wörner Abteilung Geochemie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universität Göttingen Prof. Dr. François Holtz Institut für Mineralogie, Leibniz Universität Hannover Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission Referent: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Wörner Abteilung Geochemie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universität Göttingen Korreferent: Prof. Dr. François Holtz Institut für Mineralogie, Leibniz Universität Hannover weitere Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission: Prof. Dr. Sharon Webb Abteilung Experimentelle und Angewandte Mineralogie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universität Göttingen Prof. Dr. Andreas Pack Abteilung Isotopengeologie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universität Göttingen Dr. Andreas Kronz Abteilung Geochemie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universität Göttingen Dr. Klaus Simon Abteilung Geochemie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum, Universität Göttingen Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 23. April 2014 II DEDICATION TO HANNAH AND NILS. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This PhD thesis would not have been possible without the never-ending support and patience of my Doctor Father Gerhard Wörner.
    [Show full text]