DOCSLIB.ORG

X-Rays and Neutrons: Essential Tools for Nanoscience Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
X-Rays and Neutrons: Essential Tools for Nanoscience Research X-RAYS AND NEUTRONS: ESSENTIAL TOOLS FOR NANOSCIENCE RESEARCH NNI WORKSHOP National Science and Technology Council X-RAYS AND NEUTRONS Committee on Technology Essential Tools for Nanoscience Research Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop National Nanotechnology Coordination Office June 16-18, 2005 4201 Wilson Blvd. Stafford II, Rm. 405 Arlington, VA 22230 X-RAYS AND NEUTRONS: 703-292-8626 phone ESSENTIAL TOOLS FOR 703-292-9312 fax NANOSCIENCE RESEARCH www.nano.gov Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop June 16-18, 2005, Washington, D.C. About the National Nanotechnology Initiative The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) is a coordinated Federal research and development program that brings together the expertise from twenty-five Federal agencies to guide and support advancement across the field of nanotechnology. The vision of the NNI is a future in which the ability to understand and control matter at the nanoscale leads to a revolution in technology and industry that benefits society. NNI agencies share goals, priorities, and strategies toward achieving this vision. The initiative is coordinated through the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee of the Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, with the administrative and technical support of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO). For more information on the NNI, the NSET Subcommittee, and the NNCO, see www.nano.gov. About this document This document is the report of a workshop held June 16-18, 2005 in Washington, DC. The workshop was organized by the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, with assistance from the NNCO and the endorsement of the NSET Subcommittee. The workshop sought input from the research community on the use of x-ray and neutron techniques to advance nanoscale science, engineering, and technology. The workshop and this report are intended to further the research agenda of the sponsoring agencies and fulfill the goals of the National Nanotechnology Initiative by identifying research opportunities, stimulating interactions between academic, industrial, and government scientists, and identifying improvements to our national research infrastructure needed to best support research and development activities at the nanoscale in coming decades. Cover and book design Book design and layout by NNCO and Argonne National Laboratory staff members. Cover design by Nicolle Rager Fuller of Sayo-Art. Front cover: When confined inside carbon nanotubes, water can self-assemble into nano-ice with a double helical structure similar to DNA. The helical form of nano-ice was discovered by Dr. Cheng Zeng of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s (UNL), who used UNL’s PraireFire supercomputer to perform molecular dynamics simulations over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. Oxygen atoms are depicted as blue in the inner helix, purple in the outer helix. Hydrogen atoms are depicted as white and light blue. (Courtesy of the National Academy of Sciences, PNAS 103:19664 (2006). doi:10.1073/pnas.0608401104) Copyright information This document is a work of the United States Government and is in the public domain (see 17 USC §105). Subject to stipulations below, it may be distributed and copied., with acknowledgment to the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO). Copyrights to portions of this report (including graphics) contributed by workshop participants and others are reserved by original copyright holders or their assignees, and are used here under the Government’s license or by permission. Requests to use any images must be made to the provider identified in the image credits, or to the NNCO if no provider is identified. Printed in the United States of America. 2008. X-rays and Neutrons: Essential Tools for Nanoscience Research Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop June 16-18, 2005, Washington, D.C. Workshop Chairs Ian S. Anderson Oak Ridge National Laboratory Linda Horton Oak Ridge National Laboratory Eric Isaacs Argonne National Laboratory and University of Chicago Mark A. Ratner Northwestern University Sponsored by U. S. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Center for Neutron Research National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research Acknowledgments The principal sponsors of this workshop were the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The sponsors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the workshop organizers and session leaders, who are also the principal authors of this report. They also thank all workshop attendees for thoughtful presentations and for participating in the discussions that provide the scientific content and motivation for the report. Overall guidance for the workshop and report was provided by Kristin Bennett of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, and Philip Lippel of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office. Thanks are also due to the National Science Foundation Divisions of Materials Research and Chemistry and the Joint Institute for Neutron Sciences for supporting the Early Career Poster Competition. The efforts of the organizing committee and administrative staff were essential in the planning and execution of the workshop. The sponsors wish to acknowledge special administrative assistance from: Linda Cerrone, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Karen Talamini, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Athena Jones, National Science Foundation (intern), Division of Materials Research Victor Turner, National Nanotechnology Coordination Office and the efforts of the organizing committee: Patrick Gallagher, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Center for Neutron Research Stephen Gould, National Nanotechnology Coordination Office Geoff Holdridge, National Nanotechnology Coordination Office Allen Ekkebus, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Spallation Neutron Source Helen Kerch, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Celia Merzbacher, Office of Science and Technology Policy Guebre X. Tessema, National Science Foundation, Division of Materials Research The workshop chairs would like to acknowledge writing and editorial assistance from Charlie Horak and the graphic illustration contributions from Renee Manning, both from the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The chairs would also like to acknowledge editorial and production assistance from Derrick Mancini from the Center for Nanoscale Materials; Richard Fenner and Marlene Nowotarski from the Advanced Photon Source; and Lorenza Salinas and Vicki Skonicki from the Technical Services Division, all at Argonne National Laboratory, and from Jacqueline Ruttimann for WTEC. Finally, the sponsors would like to thank the members of the National Science and Technology Council’s Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology for endorsing the workshop. This workshop was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and endorsed by the National Science and Technology Council’s Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Government or the authors’ parent institutions. Preface In order to advance knowledge and improve understanding in the fields of nanoscale science, engineering, and technology, and to promote their application for the benefit of the nation, the Government of the United States supports an interdisciplinary program in nanoscience, nanoengineering, and nanotechnology coordinated across several agencies. The President’s 2006 budget provided over $1 billion for this multidisciplinary National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). The goals of the NNI are as follows: • advance a world-class nanotechnology research and development (R&D) program • foster the transfer of new technologies into products for commercial and public benefit • develop and sustain educational resources, a skilled workforce, and the supporting research infrastructure and tools to advance nanotechnology • support responsible development of nanotechnology This document, reporting on the NNI workshop X-rays and Neutrons: Essential Tools for Nanoscience Research, attempts to help the NNI community meet these goals, especially by contributing to the multiagency effort to strengthen the nation’s infrastructure for nanoscience research. The concept for the workshop was developed by the meeting sponsors—the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in consultation with all members of the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council—to support long-range planning efforts for the NNI. Stimulated in part by an earlier NNI workshop, Instrumentation and Metrology for Nanotechnology, the sponsors identified a need to better articulate the relationship between ongoing U.S. efforts in x-ray and neutron science and the research and development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neutron Interactions and Dosimetry Outline Introduction Tissue
    Outline • Neutron dosimetry Neutron Interactions and – Thermal neutrons Dosimetry – Intermediate-energy neutrons – Fast neutrons Chapter 16 • Sources of neutrons • Mixed field dosimetry, paired dosimeters F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological • Rem meters Physics and Radiation Dosimetry Introduction Tissue composition • Consider neutron interactions with the majority tissue elements H, O, C, and N, and the resulting absorbed dose • Because of the short ranges of the secondary charged particles that are produced in such interactions, CPE is usually well approximated • Since no bremsstrahlung x-rays are generated, the • The ICRU composition for muscle has been assumed in absorbed dose can be assumed to be equal to the most cases for neutron-dose calculations, lumping the kerma at any point in neutron fields at least up to 1.1% of “other” minor elements together with oxygen to an energy E ~ 20 MeV make a simple four-element (H, O, C, N) composition Neutron kinetic energy Neutron kinetic energy • Neutron fields are divided into three • Thermal neutrons, by definition, have the most probable categories based on their kinetic energy: kinetic energy E=kT=0.025eV at T=20C – Thermal (E<0.5 eV) • Neutrons up to 0.5eV are considered “thermal” due to simplicity of experimental test after they emerge from – Intermediate-energy (0.5 eV<E<10 keV) moderator material – Fast (E>10 keV) • Cadmium ratio test: • Differ by their primary interactions in tissue – Gold foil can be activated through 197Au(n,)198Au interaction and resulting biological effects
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Instrumentation
    Neutron Instrumentation Oxford School on Neutron Scattering 5th September 2019 Ken Andersen Summary • Neutron instrument concepts – time-of-flight – Bragg’s law • Neutron Instrumentation – guides – monochromators – shielding – detectors – choppers – sample environment – collimation • Neutron diffractometers • Neutron spectrometers 2 The time-of-flight (TOF) method distance Δt time Diffraction: Bragg’s Law Diffraction: Bragg’s Law Diffraction: Bragg’s Law Diffraction: Bragg’s Law Diffraction: Bragg’s Law Diffraction: Bragg’s Law λ = 2d sinθ Diffraction: Bragg’s Law λ = 2d sinθ 2θ Reflection: Snell’s Law incident reflected n=1 θ θ’ refracted n’<1 Reflection: Snell’s Law incident reflected n=1 θ θ’ refracted θ’=0: critical angle of total n’<1 reflection θc Reflection: Snell’s Law incident reflected n=1 θ θ’ refracted θ’=0: critical angle of total n’<1 reflection θc cosθc = n' n = n' Nλ2b n' = 1− ⇒ θc = λ Nb/π 2π ≈ − 2 cosθc 1 θc 2 Reflection: Snell’s Law incident reflected n=1 θ θ’ refracted θ’=0: critical angle of total n’<1 reflection θc cosθc = n' n = n' 2 for natural Ni, Nλ b n' = 1− ⇒ θc = λ Nb/π 2π θc = λ[Å]×0.1° cosθ ≈ 1− θ2 2 c c -1 Qc = 0.0218 Å Neutron Supermirrors Courtesy of J. Stahn, PSI Neutron Supermirrors Courtesy of J. Stahn, PSI Neutron Supermirrors Courtesy of J. Stahn, PSI Neutron Supermirrors λ Reflection: θc(Ni) = λ[Å] × 0.10° c λ 1 Multilayer: θc(SM) = m × λ[Å] × 0.10° λ 2 λ 3 λ 4 } d 1 } d 2 } d3 } d4 18 Neutron Supermirrors λ Reflection: θc(Ni) = λ[Å] × 0.10° c λ 1 Multilayer: θc(SM) = m × λ[Å] × 0.10° λ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
    Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy Peter Fouquet [email protected] Institut Laue-Langevin Grenoble, France Oxford Neutron School 2017 What you are supposed to learn in this tutorial 1. The length and time scales that can be studied using NSE spectroscopy 2. The measurement principle of NSE spectroscopy 3. Discrimination techniques for coherent, incoherent and magnetic dynamics 4. To which scientific problems can I apply NSE spectroscopy? NSE-Tutorial Mind Map Quantum Mechanical Model Resonance Spin-Echo Classical Model Measurement principle “4-point Echo” NSE spectroscopy Instrument Frustrated Components Magnets Bio- molecules Time/Space Map NSE around Surface the globe Diffusion Science Cases Paramagnetic Spin Echo Experiment planning and Interpretation Diffusion Glasses Polymers Models Coherent and Incoherent Scattering Data Treatment The measurement principle of neutron spin echo spectroscopy (quantum mechanical model) • The neutron wave function is split by magnetic fields • The 2 wave packets arrive at magnetic coil 1 magnetic coil 2 polarised sample the sample with a time neutron difference t • If the molecules move between the arrival of the first and second wave packet then coherence is lost • The intermediate scattering t λ3 Bdl function I(Q,t) reflects this ∝ loss in coherence strong wavelength field integral dependence Return The measurement principle of neutron spin echo spectroscopy Dynamic Scattering NSE spectra for diffusive motion Function S(Q,ω) G(R,ω) I(Q,t) = e-t/τ Fourier Transforms temperature up ⇒ τ down Intermediate VanHove
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Activation and Prompt Gamma Intensity in Ar/CO $ {2} $-Filled Neutron Detectors at the European Spallation Source
    Neutron activation and prompt gamma intensity in Ar/CO2-filled neutron detectors at the European Spallation Source E. Diana,b,c,∗, K. Kanakib, R. J. Hall-Wiltonb,d, P. Zagyvaia,c, Sz. Czifrusc aHungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Energy Research, 1525 Budapest 114., P.O. Box 49., Hungary bEuropean Spallation Source ESS ERIC, P.O Box 176, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden cBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Nuclear Techniques, 1111 Budapest, M}uegyetem rakpart 9. dMid-Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden Abstract Monte Carlo simulations using MCNP6.1 were performed to study the effect of neutron activation in Ar/CO2 neutron detector counting gas. A general MCNP model was built and validated with simple analytical calculations. Simulations and calculations agree that only the 40Ar activation can have a considerable effect. It was shown that neither the prompt gamma intensity from the 40Ar neutron capture nor the produced 41Ar activity have an impact in terms of gamma dose rate around the detector and background level. Keywords: ESS, neutron detector, B4C, neutron activation, 41Ar, MCNP, Monte Carlo simulation 1. Introduction Ar/CO2 is a widely applied detector counting gas, with long history in ra- diation detection. Nowadays, the application of Ar/CO2-filled detectors is ex- tended in the field of neutron detection as well. However, the exposure of arXiv:1701.08117v2 [physics.ins-det] 16 Jun 2017 Ar/CO2 counting gas to neutron radiation carries the risk of neutron activa- tion. Therefore, detailed consideration of the effect and amount of neutron ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (E.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Spectroscopy with the Neutron Resonance Spin Echo Method
    High Resolution Spectroscopy with the Neutron Resonance Spin Echo Method vorgelegt von Diplom-Physiker Felix Groitl aus Erlangen von der Fakultät II - Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Dr. rer. nat. genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. M. Kneissl Gutachter: Prof. Dr. D. A. Tennant Gutachter: Prof. Dr. P. Böni Gutachter: Dr. K. Habicht Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 18.12.2012 Berlin 2013 D 83 Abstract The first part of this thesis is dedicated to explore new territory for high resolution Neu- tron Resonance Spin Echo (NRSE) spectroscopy beyond measuring lifetimes of elementary excitations. The data analysis of such experiments requires a detailed model for the echo amplitude as a function of correlation time. The model also offers guidance for planning NRSE experiments in terms of a sensible choice of parameters and allows predicting quan- titatively the information content of NRSE spectroscopy for line shape analysis or energy level separation. Major generalizations of the existing formalism, developed in this thesis, allow for violated spin echo conditions, arbitrary local gradient components of the dispersion surface and detuned parameters of the background triple axis spectrometer (TAS) giving rise to important additional depolarizing effects, which have been neglected before. Fur- thermore, the formalism can now be applied to any crystal symmetry class. The model was successfully tested by experiments on phonons in a high quality single crystal of Pb and the results demonstrate the stringent necessity to consider second order depolarization effects. The formalism was subsequently extended to analyze mode doublets. As a major step for- ward, detuning effects for both modes are taken into account here.
    [Show full text]
  • TUTORIAL on NEUTRON PHYSICS in DOSIMETRY S. Pomp1
    TUTORIAL ON NEUTRON PHYSICS IN DOSIMETRY S. Pomp1,* 1 Department of physics and astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden. *Corresponding author. E‐mail address: [email protected] (S.Pomp) Abstract: Almost since the time of the discovery of the neutron more than 70 years ago, efforts have been made to understand the effects of neutron radiation on tissue and, eventually, to use neutrons for cancer treatment. In contrast to charged particle or photon radiations which directly lead to release of electrons, neutrons interact with the nucleus and induce emission of several different types of charged particles such as protons, alpha particles or heavier ions. Therefore, a fundamental understanding of the neutron‐nucleus interaction is necessary for dose calculations and treatment planning with the needed accuracy. We will discuss the concepts of dose and kerma, neutron‐nucleus interactions and have a brief look at nuclear data needs and experimental facilities and set‐ups where such data are measured. Keywords: Neutron physics; nuclear reactions; kerma coefficients; neutron beams; Introduction Dosimetry is concerned with the ability to determine the absorbed dose in matter and tissue resulting from exposure to directly and indirectly ionizing radiation. The absorbed dose is a measure of the energy deposited per unit mass in the medium by ionizing radiation and is measured in Gray, Gy, where 1 Gy = 1 J/kg. Radiobiology then uses information about dose to assess the risks and gains. A risk is increased probability to develop cancer due to exposure to a certain dose. A gain is exposure of a cancer tumour to a certain dose in order to cure it.
    [Show full text]
  • LCLS: the First Experiments
    LCLS THE FIRST EXPERIMENTS September 2000 ii Table of Contents First Scientific Experiments for the LCLS .....................................................v Atomic Physics Experiments ..........................................................................1 Plasma and Warm Dense Matter Studies......................................................13 Structural Studies on Single Particles and Biomolecules .............................35 Femtochemistry.............................................................................................63 Studies of Nanoscale Dynamics in Condensed Matter Physics....................85 X-ray Laser Physics ....................................................................................101 Appendix 1: Committee Members..............................................................113 iii iv First Scientific Experiments for the LCLS The Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) for the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) has selected six scientific experiments for the early phase of the project. The LCLS, with proposed construction in the 2003-2006 time frame, has been designed to utilize the last third of the existing Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) linac. The linac produces a high-current 5- 15 GeV electron beam that is bunched into 230 fs slices with a 120 Hz repetition rate. When traveling through a sufficiently long (of order of 100 m) undulator, the electron bunches will lead to self amplification of the emitted x-ray intensity constituting an x-ray free electron laser (XFEL). If funded as proposed, the LCLS will be the first XFEL in the world, operating in the 800-8,000 eV energy range. The emitted coherent x-rays will have unprecedented brightness with 1012-1013 photons/pulse in a 0.2-0.4% energy bandpass and an unprecedented time structure with a design pulse length of 230 fs. Studies are under way to reduce the pulse length to tens of femtoseconds. This document presents descriptions of the early scientific experiments selected by SAC in the spring of 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
    Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy Catherine Pappas TU Delft uncluding slides and animations from R. Gähler, R. Cywinski, W. Bouwman Berlin Neutron School - 30.3.09 from the source to the detector sample and source moderator PSΕ ΙΝ sample environment PSE OUT detector Neutron flux φ = Φ η dE dΩ / 4π source flux intensity field of neutron distribution losses instrumentation definition of the beam : Q, E and polarisation Berlin Neutron School - 30.3.09 Neutron Spin Echo why ? very high resolution how ? using the transverse components of beam polarization Larmor precession Berlin Neutron School - 30.3.09 Neutron Spin Echo I: polarized neutrons - Larmor precession II: NSE : Larmor precession III: NSE : semi-classical description IV: movies V: quantum mechanical approach VI: examples VII: NSE and structure Berlin Neutron School - 30.3.09 Neutron Spin Echo I: polarized neutrons - Larmor precession II: NSE : classical description III: NSE : quantum mechanical description IV: movies V: NSE and coherence VI: exemples VII: NSE and structure Berlin Neutron School - 30.3.09 Polarized Neutrons ๏ polarizer ๏ analyzer magnetic field (guide - precession) magnetic field Neutron Neutron source polarizer B P analyzer detector flipper sample Berlin Neutron School - 30.3.09 Longitudinal polarization analysis Why longitudinal ???? after F. Tasset because we apply a magnetic field and measure the Berlinprojection Neutron School of - 30.3.09 the polarization vector along this field Larmor Precession Motion of the polarization of a neutron beam in a magnetic field dµ = γ (µ
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Report Jülich High
    General Allgemeines ual Design Report ual Design Report Concept Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source Source Jülich High Brilliance Neutron 8 Conceptual Design Report Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) J. Baggemann, S. Böhm, P. Doege, J. Fenske, M. Feygenson, A. Glavic, O. Holderer, S. Jaksch, M. Jentschel, S. Kleefisch, H. Kleines, J. Li, K. Lieutenant,P . Mastinu, E. Mauerhofer, O. Meusel, S. Pasini, H. Podlech, M. Rimmler, U. Rücker, T. Schrader, W. Schweika, M. Strobl, E. Vezhlev, J. Voigt, P. Zakalek, O. Zimmer Allgemeines / General Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 Band / Volume 8 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 ISBN 978-3-95806-501-7 T. Brückel, T. Gutberlet (Eds.) Gutberlet T. Brückel, T. Jülich High Brilliance Neutron Source (HBS) 1 100 mA proton ion source 2 70 MeV linear accelerator 5 3 Proton beam multiplexer system 5 4 Individual neutron target stations 4 5 Various instruments in the experimental halls 3 5 4 2 1 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 4 5 5 Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Allgemeines / General Band / Volume 8 CONTENT I. Executive summary 7 II. Foreword 11 III. Rationale 13 1. Neutron provision 13 1.1 Reactor based fission neutron sources 14 1.2 Spallation neutron sources 15 1.3 Accelerator driven neutron sources 15 2. Neutron landscape 16 3. Baseline design 18 3.1 Comparison to existing sources 19 IV. Science case 21 1. Chemistry 24 2. Geoscience 25 3. Environment 26 4. Engineering 27 5. Information and quantum technologies 28 6. Nanotechnology 29 7. Energy technology 30 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonie Applications of Fast Neutron Activation Analysis of Oxygen
    S E03000182 CTH-RF- 16-5 Sonie Applications of Fast Neutron Activation Analysis of Oxygen Farshid Owrang )52 Akadenmisk uppsats roir avliiggande~ av ilosofie ficentiatexamen i Reaktorf'ysik vid Chalmer's tekniska hiigskola Examinator: Prof. Imre PiAst Handledare: Dr. Anders Nordlund Granskare: Bitr. prof. G~iran Nyrnan Department of Reactor Physics Chalmers University of Technology G6teborg 2003 ISSN 0281-9775 SOME APPLICATIONS OF FAST NEUTRON ACTIVATION OF OXYGE~'N F~arshid Owrang Chalmers University of Technology Departmlent of Reactor Physics SEP-1-412 96 G~iteborg ABSTRACT In this thesis we focus on applications of neutron activation of oxygen for several purposes: A) measuring the water level in a laboratory tank, B) measuring the water flow in a pipe system set-up, C) analysing the oxygen in combustion products formed in a modern gasoline S engine, and D) measuring on-line the amount of oxygen in bulk liquids. A) Water level measurements. The purpose of this work was to perform radiation based water level measurements, aimed at nuclear reactor vessels, on a laboratory scale. A laboratory water tank was irradiated by fast neutrons from a neutron enerator. The water was activated at different water levels and the water level was decreased. The produced gamma radiation was measured using two detectors at different heights. The results showed that the method is suitable for measurement of water level and that a relatively small experimental set-up can be used for developing methods for water level measurements in real boiling water reactors based on activated oxygen in the water. B) Water flows in pipe.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Spectroscopy Study of the Diffusivity of Hydrogen in Mos2
    PCCP View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue Neutron spectroscopy study of the diffusivity of hydrogen in MoS2 Cite this: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, 23, 7961 Vitalii Kuznetsov, ab Wiebke Lohstroh,c Detlef Rogalla,d Hans-Werner Becker,d Thomas Strunskus,e Alexei Nefedov, f Eva Kovacevic,g Franziska Traegerb and Peter Fouquet *a The diffusion of hydrogen adsorbed inside layered MoS2 crystals has been studied by means of quasi- elastic neutron scattering, neutron spin-echo spectroscopy, nuclear reaction analysis, and X-ray Received 29th September 2020, photoelectron spectroscopy. The neutron time-of-flight and neutron spin-echo measurements Accepted 18th December 2020 demonstrate fast diffusion of hydrogen molecules parallel to the basal planes of the two dimensional DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05136e crystal planes. At room temperature and above, this intra-layer diffusion is of a similar speed to the surface diffusion that has been observed in earlier studies for hydrogen atoms on Pt surfaces. A significantly rsc.li/pccp slower hydrogen diffusion was observed perpendicular to the basal planes using nuclear reaction analysis. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. 1 Introduction in order to replace the expensive platinum, which is widely used today. Diffusion of molecules on surfaces is crucial for a range of Molybdenum disulphide, MoS2, has shown promising beha- chemical processes, such as catalysis or sensing, but it remains viour as a catalyst in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER),6–10 extremely difficult to observe experimentally on atomic length which is completely in line with its known activity for hydro- scales. This is particularly true for the case of light molecules genation reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • (ATR–FTIR) Spectroscopy, Micro–Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier
    Organic and Medicinal Chemistry International Journal ISSN 2474-7610 Image Article Organic & Medicinal Chem IJ Volume 6 Issue 1 - March 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Alireza Heidari DOI: 10.19080/OMCIJ.2018.06.555677 Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR–FTIR) Spectroscopy, Micro–Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (Micro–ATR–FTIR) Spectroscopy, Macro–Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (Macro–ATR–FTIR) Spectroscopy, Two–Dimensional Infrared Correlation Spectroscopy, Linear Two–Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy, Non–Linear Two– Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy Based Infrared (AFM–IR) Spectroscopy, Infrared Photodissociation Spectroscopy, Infrared Correlation Table Spectroscopy, Near– Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), Mid–Infrared Spectroscopy (MIRS), Nuclear Resonance Vibrational Spectroscopy, Thermal Infrared Spectroscopy and Photothermal Infrared Spectroscopy Comparative Study on Malignant and Benign Human Cancer Cells and Tissues under Synchrotron Radiation with the Passage of Time Alireza Heidari* Faculty of Chemistry, California South University, USA Submission: February 26, 2018; Published: March 29, 2018 *Corresponding author: Alireza Heidari, Faculty of Chemistry, California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA, Email: Abbreviations: FTIR : Fourier Transform Infrared; ATR-FTIR: Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared; Micro-ATR-FTIR: Micro- Attenuated
    [Show full text]