DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Risk Assessment Flood Risk Assessment Project Proposed Replacement Dwelling Garside Street / Shelley Street | Worksop | Nottinghamshire | S81 7BH Location Chris Yorke Adi Krasniqi Lyndale | Harworth Road Managing Director Director Blyth | Worksop BSc(Hons) | MCIAT BSc(Hons) Nottinghamshire | S81 8HQ C.Build E | MCABE Tel: 01909 591871 E. [email protected] E. [email protected] www.yorkearchitecture.com M. 07828 789 651 M. 07929 456 125 Contents 0.0 Introduction 1.0 Development and Site Location 2.0 Sequential and Exceptions Test Statement 3.0 Definition of Flood Hazard 4.0 The Probability of Flooding 5.0 Climate Change Effect 6.0 Flood Risk Measures 7.0 Off Site Impacts 8.0 Residual Risks Appendices Appendix A – Site Location Appendix B – Site Plan Appendix C – Site Levels Appendix D – Environment Agency and SFRA Information Appendix E – Wastewater and Drains Map Appendix F – Evacuation Plan Appendix G – Glossary of Terms 1.0 Introduction The assessment has been undertaken in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). It uses information of the existing topography, existing surface water drainage systems, historical flood records and simulated flood maps. This Flood Risk Assessment has been prepared in support for a proposed development of a 1No replacement dwelling located / accessed from Garside Street, Worksop, S80 2DD. Relevant information was sought from the Environment Agency (EA) and the local flood authority (Nottinghamshire County Council). Possible sources of flooding will be evaluated to determine the risk they pose to the development site. The effect of climate change will also be considered, and any off-site impacts caused, by the development. Should the risk of flooding prove to be significant, the report will endeavour to minimise the impact on the development and the local area throughout its design life to protect against the threat to life. In summary, this report confirms the proposal can be developed safely, with negligible impact on flood risk off-site. In summary the finished floor level (FFL) of the proposed dwelling is to be a minimum of 30.96mAOD to protect the dwelling against flooding. Two bedrooms will be located on the first floor to provide a safe refuge for the occupants should evacuation not prove achievable, although evacuation from the development site is a quick and easy affair given the proximity to the flood zone 2/3. Any dwelling within 8m of the top bank of the River Ryton will require permission from the Environment Agency. 2.0. Development and Site Location 2.1 Site Location The site is in the township of Worksop, 0.70km southeast of the city centre. Worksop is the principal town in the Bassetlaw district, lying on the River Ryton at the northern edge of the Sherwood Forest. The site is bordered by residential dwellings with Priorswell Recreational Ground along its east and southern borders. There is a large Morrison’s supermarket 120m north, which is part of a large commercial/services park. Grid reference E459450, N379107. Refer to Appendix A for the site location. The nearest main watercourse, the River Ryton that runs adjacent to the sites southern border. The Chesterfield Canal runs a similar course to the River Ryton on its northern bank through Worksop. The canal passes over the River Ryton around 640m to the east where it continues to follow the river on its south bank for a distance before diverging at Ranby, 6.15km northeast. The site sits in between the River Ryton and the Chesterfield Canal as they flow east out of Worksop. 2.2 Site Description The proposed development is to demolish Rose Cottage and erect a new dwelling in approximately the same location. The new dwelling will benefit from the same large garden as the original. A rough site plan is attached in Appendix B. The gross site area is approximately 0.15Ha. The site ranges from 30.12 to 30.80 metres Above Ordnance Datum (mAOD). The topography is relatively level across the site, with a gentle gradient slope southeast towards the River Ryton. The site levels are provided by UK Map Centre, available in Appendix C. From BGS data the bedrock geology is noted as Lenton sandstone formation – sandstone with the potential for Alluvium superficial deposits - clay, silt, sand and gravel. Nearby BGS borehole data also indicates this and indicates the potential presence of groundwater at 3.00m below ground. 2.3 Classification of Vulnerability Table 2 of the Technical guidance to the NPPF, the classification of the proposed development is in the ‘More Vulnerable’ category. 2.4 Flood Zone Classification The Environment Agency’s flood map shows that the development site is located within a Flood Zone 2. This zone comprises land assessed as having between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of river flooding (1% – 0.1%), or between a 1 in 200 and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of sea flooding (0.5% – 0.1%) in any year. (Appendix D). 2.5 Local Development Plan The Bassetlaw Local Development Plan (BLDP) is intended to address the district’s housing and economic needs, taking into consideration other social and environmental policies, by 2037. The BLDP calls for 9087 homes by 2037, by making best use of available land. The local plan covers the whole of Bassetlaw (Figure 1). Paragraphs 3.23, 3.24 of the BLDP identify and need for additional housing in the district to meet the issues for an expanding population. Also identified is the regeneration and renewal that an increase in housing has spearheaded, acting as a catalyst for investment. By increasing housing in the district, it is the hope to attract new industry and national chains. Figure 1 - Bassetlaw District Worksop, where the development site is located is planned to grow in a sustainable manner, with new roads and infrastructure. It is an area where infill housing developments are actively encouraged, as the towns principal district. Paragraph 5.1.16 of the BLDP identifies Worksop as the most sustainable location for significant growth and the best location to deliver the goals of the spatial strategy. Worksop is a priority development site, due to its ability to expand. Worksop will deliver some 2180 new dwellings over the plan period. The other major towns for renewal are Retford and Harworth, although the approach to renewal is different to that of Worksop. Policy ST1 actively encourages the use of greenfield sites to bring change about as part of the spatial strategy. Although the development site is greenfield it is infill and does not increase the urban footprint. The settlement can be seen in Figure 2 below. Figure 2 - BLDP Settlement Hierarchy 3.0 Sequential and Exceptions Test In accordance with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency’s published guidance on the sequential and exceptions tests (developments that don’t need a sequential test) ‘You don’t need to do a sequential test if one has already been carried out for a development of the type you’re planning (eg a residential development) for your site’ A sequential test has already been carried out for this site on a previous application, however, more importantly, this is an application for a replacement dwelling and as such there is no increase in dwelling numbers and no increase in flood risk or the number of households at risk from flooding. 4.0 Definition of the Flood Hazard The sources of flooding that could potentially affect the site are the following: - • Flooding from water courses o River Ryton o Chesterfield Canal o Chesterfield Canal Feeder o Sandhill Lake • Flooding from land • Flooding from sewers • Flooding from ground water • Flooding from reservoirs A Main River Map is attached in Appendix D. 4.1 The River Ryton In the case of the River Ryton it is considered that fluvial flooding represents the worst- case scenario rather than tidal flooding, and therefore fluvial flooding is considered over tidal flooding. The development sites south border abuts the north bank of the River Ryton. The EA information includes modelled water level results for various defended storm events of the River Ryton. Table 1 below details a summary of the information most relevant to the site. Refer to Appendix D for EA data. The EA have not provided any floodplain heights or crest levels for this model. Table 1; - Defended modelled results of the River Ryton at the points closest to the site. From table 1 the levels for a 0.1% (1 in 1000 year event) from the relevant node points is 30.36mAOD. With a minimum finished floor level (FFL) of 30.96mAOD, 600mm above the 1 in 1000 year event, adequate protection against flooding is provided for the lifetime of the development. The 30.96mAOD FFL is 730mm above the predicted flood level for a 1 in 100 year event, with climate change taken into consideration. The Bassetlaw District Council 100 year with climate change flood depth (Appendix D) predicts the southern half of the site would be the worst affected, inundated with water to a maximum depth of 0.5m in such an event. Interpolating the flood depth against the ground levels from the UK Map Centre data (Appendix C), the flood depth is 30.80mAOD. The minimum FFL of 30.96mAOD is 160mm above the 1 in 100 year +CC event SFRA scenario. A source of flooding is identified as overtopping Priorswell Road that flows into Shelley Street during a 1 in 100 year storm event (Appendix D). This is confirmed in the Bassetlaw council Dynamic Map which shows the flow moving along Shelley Street from Priorswell Road (Appendix D). For a 1 in 100 year flood event the indicated flood heights are only 0.08m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021
    Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final June 2016 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager 7 June 2016 Local Flood Risk Management Derek
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
    River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Humberhead Levels Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Management Plan the Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan
    catchment management plan The Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan he catchment of the Rivers Idle and Torne The key objectives of the plan are therefore to: T covers an area of 1 307 km2 within north Nottinghamshire and south Humberside and has • Establish a balance between the demands of a resident population of about 625,000 people. irrigation and abstraction and the needs of the environment. Man has impacted on the catchment since early times and the area has a rich industrial and • Ensure that the quality of minewater archaeological heritage. The heavily urbanised discharged to the rivers is of a and industrial headwaters contrast sharply with standard appropriate to the needs of the very flat, open and rural lower reaches nearer downstream users. to the confluences with the River Trent. Man's influence is also apparent here though where • Initiate and promote proposals for the drains have been cut and rivers re-routed and improvement of habitats for fisheries straightened to produce highly productive and conservation. agricultural areas. • Ensure that the standard of flood protection The catchment is predominantly rural with the is appropriate to the needs of the adjacent exception of the headwaters, as described above. land use, consistent with the vision. The River Idle and its tributaries flow through the heavily industrialised towns of Mansfield and The achievement of this vision is dependant on Worksop, then through the rolling forested areas the committed and enthusiastic cooperation of of Sherwood Forest and the Dukeries. The River others. Some objectives are common goals, while Torne rises on the edge of Doncaster and others may require a degree of compromise flows through the flat areas of low land, between differing demands on the resources of characterised by the Isle of Axholme, Thorne the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • 151207 402-05891-00001 Licensed Abstractions.Xlsx
    IGas Energy Appendix 9/2: December 2015 Tinkers Lane 1 Licensed Abstractions SLR Ref: 402-05891-00001 Distance from Ref No Licence Number Licence Holder Grid Reference Type Source Purpose Annual Quanity (m3) Site (km) A1 Mineral Products - General Use (Medium Loss) 44825 03/28/77/0048/2/R01 The Rotherham, Sand & Gravel Co Ltd SK 65120 889 3.6 Groundwater Lagoon A2 Mineral Products - Mineral Washing 273900 Borehole - Sherwood A3 MD/028/0075/008 F L Green and Sons Ltd SK 62309 820 4.3 Groundwater Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 126000 Sandstone A4 03/28/77/0041 Bawtry Farms Limited SK 64720 884 3.1 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 72133 A5 36067 03/28/77/0033 D Skelton & Sons SK 64720 884 3.1 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct A6 32433 A7 SK 6660 8872 3.7 03/28/77/0031 H W Smith& Sons Groundwater Gravel Pit Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 9092 A8 SK 6715 8884 4.1 A9 90920 03/28/77/0028 Grange Farm (Barnby Moor) SK 66123 847 1.2 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct A10 55690 A11 03/28/77/0025 W Moore & Son SK 6479 8687 1.5 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 45461 A12 03/28/77/0020 Mattersey Rifle & Pistol Club SK 684 878 4.2 Groundwater Borehole Extractive Mineral Washing 32731.2 A13 03/28/77/0001 W Moore & Son SK 627 863 2.5 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 68190 A14 Agriculture - Spray Irrigation - Direct 54553 03/28/76/0023 Peter Taylor (Oldcotes) Ltd SK 6060 8720 4.8 Groundwater Borehole
    [Show full text]
  • Worksop – November 2019
    APPENDIX J SECTION 19 REPORT – WORKSOP – NOVEMBER 2019 Introduction Section 19 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 states: 1. On becoming aware of a flood in its area, a lead local flood authority must, to the extent that it considers it necessary or appropriate, investigate: (a) Which Risk Management Authorities (RMAs) have relevant flood risk management functions. (b) Whether each of those Risk Management Authorities has exercised, or is proposing to exercise, those functions in response to the flood. 2. Where an authority carries out an investigation under subsection (1) of Section 19 it must:- (a) Publish the results of its investigation. (b) Notify any relevant Risk Management Authorities. 3. The objective of this report is to investigate which Risk Management Authority had relevant flood risk management functions during the flooding in November 2019 and whether the relevant RMAs have exercised, or propose to exercise, their risk management functions (as per section 19(1) of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010). 4. The Risk Management Authorities with a duty to respond to this flooding incident are, Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC) as Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA), Nottinghamshire County Council as Highways Authority (Via East Midlands Ltd.), the Environment Agency (EA), Nottinghamshire Police, Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue, Severn Trent Water (STW) and Bassetlaw District Council (BDC). 5. It should be noted that this duty to investigate does not guarantee that flooding problems will be resolved and cannot force others into action. Background 6. On the 7th November 2019, parts of the East Midlands experienced a month’s worth of rainfall in just 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • English Fords Statistics (Dec19)
    Reconciliation of Geograph Photographs versus English Fords and Wetroads as at 20th June 2021 Id Name Grid Ref WR County Submitter Hits 3020116 Radwell Causeway TL0056 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 40 3069286 Ford and Packhorse Bridge at Sutton TL2247 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 98 3264116 Gated former Ford at North Crawley SP9344 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 61 3020108 Ford at Farndish SP9364 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 57 3020123 Felmersham Causeway SP9957 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 40 3020133 Ford at Clapham TL0352 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 95 3020073 Upper Dean Ford TL0467 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 154 5206262 Ford at Priory Country ParK TL0748 B Bedfordshire John Walton 87 3515781 Border Ford at Headley SU5263 ü Berkshire John Walton 103 3515770 Ford at Bagnor SU5469 ü Berkshire John Walton 48 3515707 Ford at Bucklebury SU5471 ü Berkshire John Walton 88 3515679 Ford and Riders at Bucklebury SU5470 ü Berkshire John Walton 127 3515650 Byway Ford at Stanford Dingley SU5671 ü Berkshire John Walton 52 3515644 Byway Ford at Stanford Dingley SU5671 ü Berkshire John Walton 55 3492617 Byway Ford at Hurst SU7874 ü Berkshire John Walton 82 3492594 Ford ar Burghfield Common SU6567 ü Berkshire John Walton 101 3492543 Ford at Jouldings Farm SU7563 ü Berkshire John Walton 74 3492407 Byway Ford at Arborfield Cross SU7667 ü Berkshire John Walton 168 3492425 Byway Ford at Arborfield Cross SU7667 ü Berkshire John Walton 177 3492446 Ford at Carter's Hill Farm SU7668 ü Berkshire John Walton 84 3492349 Ford at Gardners Green SU8266 ü Berkshire John Walton
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Local Flood Risk Management Strategy May 2014
    RRootthheerrhhaamm LLooccaall FFlloooodd RRiisskk MMaannaaggeemmeenntt SSttrraatteeggyy MMaayy 22001144 Produced by: Drainage Team, Streetpride, Environment & Development Services File: 17/187/46 Issued: May 2014 Edition: 1 Revision: 0 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Sources of Flooding 1 1.3 Introduction to the Area 2 2.0 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT 3 3.0 LINKS TO OTHER STRATEGIES 4 3.1 National Plans 6 3.2 Regional Plans 6 3.3 Rotherham Local Plans – (Flood related) 8 3.4 Rotherham Local Plans – (non flood related) 9 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL FLOOD RISK 11 4.1 Past flood events 11 4.2 Environment Agency Surface Water Flood Risk Modelling 11 5.0 GOVERNANCE AND PARTNERSHIP ARRANGEMENTS 12 6.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITIES 14 6.1 Definition 14 6.2 Lead Local Flood Authority – Rotherham MBC 14 6.3 The Environment Agency 17 6.4 Water Companies – Yorkshire Water Services Ltd and Severn Trent Water Ltd 18 6.5 Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs) 18 6.6 Highway Authority - Rotherham MBC & Highways Agency 18 6.7 Other Powers and Duties of Rotherham MBC 19 6.8 As a Category 1 Responder (Emergency Planning) 19 6.9 As Planning Authority 19 6.10 As Sustainable Drainage Systems Approving Body (SAB) 20 6.11 As a Riparian Owner 20 6.12 Other Partners 21 7.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE STRATEGY 22 8.0 ACTION PLAN 23 9.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FUNDING 23 10.0 THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE 24 10.1 Effects of Climate Change 24 10.2 The Evidence 24 10.3 Key Projections for Humber River Basin District 25 10.4 Implications for Flood Risk 25 10.5 Adapting
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Physical and Economic Factors That Influenced the Building of the Chesterfield Canal and Its Subsequent History
    1 An Analysis of the Physical and Economic Factors that Influenced the Building of the Chesterfield Canal and its Subsequent History By John Alan Taylor, BA, Dip Ed Contents List of Illustrations, p2 Preface, p3 Chapter 1 - THE GEOLOGY OF THE CHESTERFIELD CANAL, p11 Chapter 2 - THE LANDFORMS AND DRAINAGE OF THE AREA, p21 Chapter 3 - HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL FACTORS, p25 Chapter 4 - THE CHESTERFIELD CANAL, p29 Conclusion – p44 Appendix 1 - Chesterfield Canal; list of locks and mileages, p46 Appendix 2 - Part of the summit pound on the eastern section of the canal, p47 Appendix 3 - Generalised vertical sections, p48 Acknowledgements, p 52 2 Illustrations A starvationer boat, p3 A cuckoo boat in 1906, p6 Dawn Rose, p6 Figure 1, Course of the canal, p8 First paragraphs of the Act of Parliament authorising the canal, p 8 Figure 2, Section along the Chesterfield Canal, p9 Figure 3, Geological Timescale, Cambrian to present day, p10 Figure 4, Cross-section showing Paleozoic and later rocks at Ingleborough, p12 Figure 5, Relief of the Pennines and the position of the relevant blocks, p14 Figure 6, Rocks of the Pennines and adjacent areas, p15 Figure 7, Cross- section of the Upper and Middle Coal Measures, p17 Figure 8, Anticlines and synclines in the Chesterfield area, p18 Figure 9, Geology along the route of the canal between the Rother Valley and Thorpe Locks, p20 Figure 10, Land forms (principal escarpments) of the area around the route of the canal, p21 Figure 11, The Matlock area, geology and former lead mines, p22 Figure 12, Horizon - Contour Map of the Don Monocline p,23 Figure 13, Geology of the route of the canal through the Worksop area, p24 West Stockwith, p24 Figure 14, Sites of the principal coal mines, p30 Figure 15, The principal waterways and towns before 1794, p32 Figure 16, Waterways in the North Midlands area, p33 Figure 17, Canal, tunnel and feeder reservoirs, p35 Figure 18, Geology of fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Study
    Bassetlaw District Council Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Study Scoping Report July 2009 Prepared for: Bassetlaw District Council Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study- Scoping Study Revision Schedule Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Report July 2009 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2009 Draft Scoping Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Damon O'Brien Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Technical Director Specialist Specialist Helen Burton Assistant Flood Risk Specialist 02 May 2009 Final Scoping Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Damon O’Brien Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Technical Director Specialist Specialist 03 July 2009 Final Scoping Gemma Costin Neil Mackenzie Jon Robinson Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Water Specialist Associate Director Specialist Scott Wilson Mansfield i-Centre Hamilton Way Mansfield This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's Nottinghamshire appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson NG18 5BR accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Tel 01623 600660 written permi ssion of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the Fax 01623 600661 context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Closure Report Idle and Torne Priority Catchment 2019 - March 2021
    Project Closure Report Idle and Torne Priority Catchment 2019 - March 2021 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 Reason for the Action Plan.............................................................................................. 2 Catchment Group............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Group................................................................................................................. 3 CaBa partnerships ........................................................................................................... 4 Opportunity/Trials............................................................................................................. 4 Next Steps ........................................................................................................................ 9 Future projects ................................................................................................................. 9 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix B ..................................................................................................................... 15 File Links and Locations (Sharepoint) .......................................................................... 20 Introduction The abstraction plan published in December 2017 sets out
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Profile Report As an Evidence-Based Document and As a Source for Additional Details Regarding Individual Street and Photographic Examples
    BLYTH NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER PROFILE 1 Neighbourhood Character Profile Blyth Neighbourhood Plan January 2019 This page is intentionally left blank 1 Neighbourhood Character Profile BLYTH NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER PROFILE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2. How to use this Report ........................................................................................ 1 3. Neighbourhood Profiles ....................................................................................... 4 3.1. Neighbourhood Area 1 - North ...................................................................... 4 3.2. Neighbourhood Area 2 - North-West ........................................................... 17 3.3. Neighbourhood Area 3 - Conservation Area ............................................... 25 3.4. Neighbourhood Area 4 - East...................................................................... 40 3.5. Neighbourhood Area 5 - South ................................................................... 54 4. Key Recommendations for Neighbourhood Plan Policies .................................. 65 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Neighbourhood Areas Map of Blyth ........................................................... 4 Figure 2: Neighbourhood Area Map 1 - North ........................................................... 5 Figure 3: Neighbourhood Area Map 2 - North-West ................................................ 17 Figure 4: Neighbourhood Area
    [Show full text]