DOCSLIB.ORG

Rotherham Local Flood Risk Management Strategy May 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rotherham Local Flood Risk Management Strategy May 2014 RRootthheerrhhaamm LLooccaall FFlloooodd RRiisskk MMaannaaggeemmeenntt SSttrraatteeggyy MMaayy 22001144 Produced by: Drainage Team, Streetpride, Environment & Development Services File: 17/187/46 Issued: May 2014 Edition: 1 Revision: 0 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Sources of Flooding 1 1.3 Introduction to the Area 2 2.0 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT 3 3.0 LINKS TO OTHER STRATEGIES 4 3.1 National Plans 6 3.2 Regional Plans 6 3.3 Rotherham Local Plans – (Flood related) 8 3.4 Rotherham Local Plans – (non flood related) 9 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL FLOOD RISK 11 4.1 Past flood events 11 4.2 Environment Agency Surface Water Flood Risk Modelling 11 5.0 GOVERNANCE AND PARTNERSHIP ARRANGEMENTS 12 6.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITIES 14 6.1 Definition 14 6.2 Lead Local Flood Authority – Rotherham MBC 14 6.3 The Environment Agency 17 6.4 Water Companies – Yorkshire Water Services Ltd and Severn Trent Water Ltd 18 6.5 Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs) 18 6.6 Highway Authority - Rotherham MBC & Highways Agency 18 6.7 Other Powers and Duties of Rotherham MBC 19 6.8 As a Category 1 Responder (Emergency Planning) 19 6.9 As Planning Authority 19 6.10 As Sustainable Drainage Systems Approving Body (SAB) 20 6.11 As a Riparian Owner 20 6.12 Other Partners 21 7.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE STRATEGY 22 8.0 ACTION PLAN 23 9.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FUNDING 23 10.0 THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE 24 10.1 Effects of Climate Change 24 10.2 The Evidence 24 10.3 Key Projections for Humber River Basin District 25 10.4 Implications for Flood Risk 25 10.5 Adapting to Change 25 May 2014 Edition: 1 File: 17/187/46 Revision: 0 10.6 Long Term Developments 26 11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 26 12.0 COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT 27 13.0 CIVIL CONTINGENCIES AND COMMUNITY RESILIENCE 27 14.0 THE ROLE OF THE PLANNING AUTHORITY 28 15.0 SUDS APPROVING BODY (SAB) 28 16.0 ADDRESSING THE SKILLS GAP 28 17.0 DATA MANAGEMENT 28 18.0 THE ROLE OF SCRUTINY AND OVERVIEW COMMITTEES 29 19.0 REVIEWING AND REVISING THE STRATEGY 30 APPENDICES Appendix A - Action Plan Appendix B - Drawings Appendix C - Policies May 2014 Edition: 1 File: 17/187/46 Revision: 0 GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS Assets Structures, or a system of structures, used to manage flood risk. Areas Susceptible to A method of surface water flood modelling Surface Water Flooding carried out by the Environment Agency to (AStSWF) indicate the broad areas likely to be at risk of surface water flooding. Now superseded by Risk of Flooding from Surface Water Map. See also FMfSW & RFfSW. Catchment An area that serves a watercourse with rainwater. Every part of land where the rainfall drains to a single watercourse is in the same catchment. Catchment Flood A strategic planning tool through which the Management Plan (CFMP) Environment Agency works with other key decision-makers on the large scale of a River Basin District to identify and agree overarching policies for sustainable flood risk management. Critical Infrastructure Infrastructure which is considered vital or indispensable to society, the economy, public health or the environment, and where the failure or destruction would have large impact. This would include emergency services such as hospitals, schools, communications, electricity sub-stations, water and waste water treatment works, transport infrastructure and reservoirs. Defence A structure that is used to reduce the probability of floodwater affecting a particular area, for example a raised embankment. Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. The government department with overall responsibility for flood risk management. FRM Flood Risk Management. FCERM Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management. Flood The temporary covering by water of land not normally covered with water. Flood Map for Surface Water A method of surface water flood modelling (FMfSW) carried out by the Environment Agency to indicate the broad areas likely to be at risk of surface water flooding, now superseded by Risk of Flooding From Surface Water Map. See also AStSWF & RFfSW. Flood Risk Area An area determined as having a significant risk of flooding in accordance with guidance published by Defra. Flood and Water The Flood and Water Management Act clarifies Management Act 2010 (FWM the legislative framework for managing surface Act) water flood risk in England. May 2014 Edition: 1 File: 17/187/46 Revision: 0 Fluvial flooding Flooding of main rivers. Floods Directive The EU Floods Directive came into force in November 2007 and is designed to help Member States prevent and limit the impact of floods on people, property and the environment. It was transposed into English law in December 2009 by the Flood Risk Regulations. Groundwater Water which is below the surface of the ground and in direct contact with the ground or subsoil. Hazard A potential source of harm. Hydrology The study of the effects of water on and below the earth’s surface. Internal Drainage Board Drainage Board who are legally responsible to (Danvm IDB in Rotherham) ensure that flows are maintained in ordinary watercourses within their domain. Local Development Local Planning Authority documents which Framework (LDF) comprises of community involvement, local development scheme and the annual monitoring report. Lead Local Flood Authority Local Authority with Flood Risk Management (LLFA) Functions as defined in the Flood and Water Management Act. Local flood risk Flood risk from sources other than main rivers, the sea and reservoirs, principally meaning surface runoff, groundwater and ordinary watercourses. Main River A watercourse shown as such on the Main River Map and for which the Environment Agency has flood risk management responsibilities and powers. Ordinary watercourses A river, stream, ditch, cut, sluice, dike or non- public sewer that is not a designated Main River and for which the Lead Local Flood Authority has flood risk management responsibilities and powers. Pluvial flooding Pluvial flooding (or surface runoff flooding) is caused by rainfall and is that flooding which occurs due to water ponding on, or flowing over, the surface before it reaches a drain or watercourse. Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment of surface water flood risk in the Assessment (PFRA) area covered by a Lead Local Flood Authority (Rotherham PFRA submitted describing both the probability and harmful to Defra December 2011) consequences of past and predicted future flooding. Flood Risk Regulations UK legislation implementing the European Floods Directive 2009. May 2014 Edition: 1 File: 17/187/46 Revision: 0 Resilience The ability of the community, services, area or infrastructure to withstand the consequences of an incident. Riparian owner A riparian owner is someone who owns land or property adjacent to a watercourse. A riparian owner has a duty to maintain the watercourse and allow flow to pass through their land freely. Risk Measures the significance of a potential event in terms of likelihood and impact. Risk is the likelihood that a person may be harmed or suffers adverse health effects if exposed to a hazard. Risk assessment A structured and auditable process of identifying potentially significant events, assessing their likelihood and impacts, and then combining these to provide an overall assessment of risk, as a basis for further decisions and action. Risk of Flooding From A map showing results of surface water flood Surface Water Map (RFfSW) modelling carried out by the Environment Agency to indicate the broad areas likely to be at risk of surface water flooding. See also FMfSW & AStSWF. River basin district There are 11 river basin districts in England and Wales, each comprising a number of contiguous river basins or catchments. Strategic Flood Risk Documents prepared by local planning Assessment (SFRA) authorities assessing broad areas of flood risk to inform planning decisions. Surface runoff Rainwater (including snow and other precipitation) which is on the surface of the ground (whether or not it is moving), and has not entered a watercourse, drainage system or public sewer. Surface Water Flooding In this context, surface water flooding describes flooding from sewers, drains, groundwater, and runoff from land, small water courses and ditches that occurs as a result of heavy rainfall. Surface Water Management A plan which outlines the preferred surface Plan (SWMP) water management strategy in a given location. Sustainable Drainage A sequence of management practices and Systems (SuDS) control measures designed to mimic natural drainage processes by allowing rainfall to infiltrate and by attenuating and conveying surface water runoff slowly compared to conventional drainage. May 2014 Edition: 1 File: 17/187/46 Revision: 0 Water Framework Directive A European Community Directive (2000/60/EC) (WFD) of the European Parliament and Council designed to integrate the way water bodies are managed across Europe. It requires all inland and coastal waters to reach “good status” by 2015 through a catchment-based system of River Basin Management Plans. May 2014 Edition: 1 File: 17/187/46 Revision: 0 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview In June 2008, Sir Michael Pitt published his final report, Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods, which called for urgent and fundamental changes in the way the country is adapting to the increased risk of flooding, the need to provide consistent and co-ordinated management of flood risk, communication with communities, identification of those responsible in the local management of flood events, and adaptation to climate change. The report states that local authorities should play a major role in the management of local flood risk, taking the lead in tackling problems of local flooding and co-ordinating all relevant agencies. The Flood Risk Regulations 2009 and Flood and Water Management Act 2010 are an important part of the Government’s response to the Pitt Report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021
    Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final June 2016 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager 7 June 2016 Local Flood Risk Management Derek
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
    River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Humberhead Levels Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Management Plan the Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan
    catchment management plan The Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan he catchment of the Rivers Idle and Torne The key objectives of the plan are therefore to: T covers an area of 1 307 km2 within north Nottinghamshire and south Humberside and has • Establish a balance between the demands of a resident population of about 625,000 people. irrigation and abstraction and the needs of the environment. Man has impacted on the catchment since early times and the area has a rich industrial and • Ensure that the quality of minewater archaeological heritage. The heavily urbanised discharged to the rivers is of a and industrial headwaters contrast sharply with standard appropriate to the needs of the very flat, open and rural lower reaches nearer downstream users. to the confluences with the River Trent. Man's influence is also apparent here though where • Initiate and promote proposals for the drains have been cut and rivers re-routed and improvement of habitats for fisheries straightened to produce highly productive and conservation. agricultural areas. • Ensure that the standard of flood protection The catchment is predominantly rural with the is appropriate to the needs of the adjacent exception of the headwaters, as described above. land use, consistent with the vision. The River Idle and its tributaries flow through the heavily industrialised towns of Mansfield and The achievement of this vision is dependant on Worksop, then through the rolling forested areas the committed and enthusiastic cooperation of of Sherwood Forest and the Dukeries. The River others. Some objectives are common goals, while Torne rises on the edge of Doncaster and others may require a degree of compromise flows through the flat areas of low land, between differing demands on the resources of characterised by the Isle of Axholme, Thorne the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • 151207 402-05891-00001 Licensed Abstractions.Xlsx
    IGas Energy Appendix 9/2: December 2015 Tinkers Lane 1 Licensed Abstractions SLR Ref: 402-05891-00001 Distance from Ref No Licence Number Licence Holder Grid Reference Type Source Purpose Annual Quanity (m3) Site (km) A1 Mineral Products - General Use (Medium Loss) 44825 03/28/77/0048/2/R01 The Rotherham, Sand & Gravel Co Ltd SK 65120 889 3.6 Groundwater Lagoon A2 Mineral Products - Mineral Washing 273900 Borehole - Sherwood A3 MD/028/0075/008 F L Green and Sons Ltd SK 62309 820 4.3 Groundwater Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 126000 Sandstone A4 03/28/77/0041 Bawtry Farms Limited SK 64720 884 3.1 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 72133 A5 36067 03/28/77/0033 D Skelton & Sons SK 64720 884 3.1 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct A6 32433 A7 SK 6660 8872 3.7 03/28/77/0031 H W Smith& Sons Groundwater Gravel Pit Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 9092 A8 SK 6715 8884 4.1 A9 90920 03/28/77/0028 Grange Farm (Barnby Moor) SK 66123 847 1.2 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct A10 55690 A11 03/28/77/0025 W Moore & Son SK 6479 8687 1.5 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 45461 A12 03/28/77/0020 Mattersey Rifle & Pistol Club SK 684 878 4.2 Groundwater Borehole Extractive Mineral Washing 32731.2 A13 03/28/77/0001 W Moore & Son SK 627 863 2.5 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 68190 A14 Agriculture - Spray Irrigation - Direct 54553 03/28/76/0023 Peter Taylor (Oldcotes) Ltd SK 6060 8720 4.8 Groundwater Borehole
    [Show full text]
  • Worksop – November 2019
    APPENDIX J SECTION 19 REPORT – WORKSOP – NOVEMBER 2019 Introduction Section 19 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 states: 1. On becoming aware of a flood in its area, a lead local flood authority must, to the extent that it considers it necessary or appropriate, investigate: (a) Which Risk Management Authorities (RMAs) have relevant flood risk management functions. (b) Whether each of those Risk Management Authorities has exercised, or is proposing to exercise, those functions in response to the flood. 2. Where an authority carries out an investigation under subsection (1) of Section 19 it must:- (a) Publish the results of its investigation. (b) Notify any relevant Risk Management Authorities. 3. The objective of this report is to investigate which Risk Management Authority had relevant flood risk management functions during the flooding in November 2019 and whether the relevant RMAs have exercised, or propose to exercise, their risk management functions (as per section 19(1) of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010). 4. The Risk Management Authorities with a duty to respond to this flooding incident are, Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC) as Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA), Nottinghamshire County Council as Highways Authority (Via East Midlands Ltd.), the Environment Agency (EA), Nottinghamshire Police, Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue, Severn Trent Water (STW) and Bassetlaw District Council (BDC). 5. It should be noted that this duty to investigate does not guarantee that flooding problems will be resolved and cannot force others into action. Background 6. On the 7th November 2019, parts of the East Midlands experienced a month’s worth of rainfall in just 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • English Fords Statistics (Dec19)
    Reconciliation of Geograph Photographs versus English Fords and Wetroads as at 20th June 2021 Id Name Grid Ref WR County Submitter Hits 3020116 Radwell Causeway TL0056 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 40 3069286 Ford and Packhorse Bridge at Sutton TL2247 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 98 3264116 Gated former Ford at North Crawley SP9344 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 61 3020108 Ford at Farndish SP9364 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 57 3020123 Felmersham Causeway SP9957 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 40 3020133 Ford at Clapham TL0352 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 95 3020073 Upper Dean Ford TL0467 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 154 5206262 Ford at Priory Country ParK TL0748 B Bedfordshire John Walton 87 3515781 Border Ford at Headley SU5263 ü Berkshire John Walton 103 3515770 Ford at Bagnor SU5469 ü Berkshire John Walton 48 3515707 Ford at Bucklebury SU5471 ü Berkshire John Walton 88 3515679 Ford and Riders at Bucklebury SU5470 ü Berkshire John Walton 127 3515650 Byway Ford at Stanford Dingley SU5671 ü Berkshire John Walton 52 3515644 Byway Ford at Stanford Dingley SU5671 ü Berkshire John Walton 55 3492617 Byway Ford at Hurst SU7874 ü Berkshire John Walton 82 3492594 Ford ar Burghfield Common SU6567 ü Berkshire John Walton 101 3492543 Ford at Jouldings Farm SU7563 ü Berkshire John Walton 74 3492407 Byway Ford at Arborfield Cross SU7667 ü Berkshire John Walton 168 3492425 Byway Ford at Arborfield Cross SU7667 ü Berkshire John Walton 177 3492446 Ford at Carter's Hill Farm SU7668 ü Berkshire John Walton 84 3492349 Ford at Gardners Green SU8266 ü Berkshire John Walton
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Physical and Economic Factors That Influenced the Building of the Chesterfield Canal and Its Subsequent History
    1 An Analysis of the Physical and Economic Factors that Influenced the Building of the Chesterfield Canal and its Subsequent History By John Alan Taylor, BA, Dip Ed Contents List of Illustrations, p2 Preface, p3 Chapter 1 - THE GEOLOGY OF THE CHESTERFIELD CANAL, p11 Chapter 2 - THE LANDFORMS AND DRAINAGE OF THE AREA, p21 Chapter 3 - HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL FACTORS, p25 Chapter 4 - THE CHESTERFIELD CANAL, p29 Conclusion – p44 Appendix 1 - Chesterfield Canal; list of locks and mileages, p46 Appendix 2 - Part of the summit pound on the eastern section of the canal, p47 Appendix 3 - Generalised vertical sections, p48 Acknowledgements, p 52 2 Illustrations A starvationer boat, p3 A cuckoo boat in 1906, p6 Dawn Rose, p6 Figure 1, Course of the canal, p8 First paragraphs of the Act of Parliament authorising the canal, p 8 Figure 2, Section along the Chesterfield Canal, p9 Figure 3, Geological Timescale, Cambrian to present day, p10 Figure 4, Cross-section showing Paleozoic and later rocks at Ingleborough, p12 Figure 5, Relief of the Pennines and the position of the relevant blocks, p14 Figure 6, Rocks of the Pennines and adjacent areas, p15 Figure 7, Cross- section of the Upper and Middle Coal Measures, p17 Figure 8, Anticlines and synclines in the Chesterfield area, p18 Figure 9, Geology along the route of the canal between the Rother Valley and Thorpe Locks, p20 Figure 10, Land forms (principal escarpments) of the area around the route of the canal, p21 Figure 11, The Matlock area, geology and former lead mines, p22 Figure 12, Horizon - Contour Map of the Don Monocline p,23 Figure 13, Geology of the route of the canal through the Worksop area, p24 West Stockwith, p24 Figure 14, Sites of the principal coal mines, p30 Figure 15, The principal waterways and towns before 1794, p32 Figure 16, Waterways in the North Midlands area, p33 Figure 17, Canal, tunnel and feeder reservoirs, p35 Figure 18, Geology of fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Study
    Bassetlaw District Council Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Study Scoping Report July 2009 Prepared for: Bassetlaw District Council Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study- Scoping Study Revision Schedule Bassetlaw Water Cycle Study Scoping Report July 2009 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2009 Draft Scoping Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Damon O'Brien Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Technical Director Specialist Specialist Helen Burton Assistant Flood Risk Specialist 02 May 2009 Final Scoping Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Damon O’Brien Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Technical Director Specialist Specialist 03 July 2009 Final Scoping Gemma Costin Neil Mackenzie Jon Robinson Report Assistant Flood Risk Senior Water Specialist Associate Director Specialist Scott Wilson Mansfield i-Centre Hamilton Way Mansfield This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's Nottinghamshire appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson NG18 5BR accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Tel 01623 600660 written permi ssion of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the Fax 01623 600661 context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Closure Report Idle and Torne Priority Catchment 2019 - March 2021
    Project Closure Report Idle and Torne Priority Catchment 2019 - March 2021 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 Reason for the Action Plan.............................................................................................. 2 Catchment Group............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Group................................................................................................................. 3 CaBa partnerships ........................................................................................................... 4 Opportunity/Trials............................................................................................................. 4 Next Steps ........................................................................................................................ 9 Future projects ................................................................................................................. 9 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix B ..................................................................................................................... 15 File Links and Locations (Sharepoint) .......................................................................... 20 Introduction The abstraction plan published in December 2017 sets out
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Profile Report As an Evidence-Based Document and As a Source for Additional Details Regarding Individual Street and Photographic Examples
    BLYTH NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER PROFILE 1 Neighbourhood Character Profile Blyth Neighbourhood Plan January 2019 This page is intentionally left blank 1 Neighbourhood Character Profile BLYTH NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER PROFILE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2. How to use this Report ........................................................................................ 1 3. Neighbourhood Profiles ....................................................................................... 4 3.1. Neighbourhood Area 1 - North ...................................................................... 4 3.2. Neighbourhood Area 2 - North-West ........................................................... 17 3.3. Neighbourhood Area 3 - Conservation Area ............................................... 25 3.4. Neighbourhood Area 4 - East...................................................................... 40 3.5. Neighbourhood Area 5 - South ................................................................... 54 4. Key Recommendations for Neighbourhood Plan Policies .................................. 65 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Neighbourhood Areas Map of Blyth ........................................................... 4 Figure 2: Neighbourhood Area Map 1 - North ........................................................... 5 Figure 3: Neighbourhood Area Map 2 - North-West ................................................ 17 Figure 4: Neighbourhood Area
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Visit Anston Brook, South Yorkshire September 2011
    Advisory Visit Anston Brook, South Yorkshire September 2011 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit undertaken by Tim Jacklin of the Wild Trout Trust to the Anston Brook, Anston, near Worksop on 29th September, 2011. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with David Newborough, Environment Officer, Environment Agency (EA). Normal convention is applied throughout the report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left hand bank (LHB) or right hand bank (RHB) whilst looking downstream. 2.0 Overview The Anston Brook is a headwater of the River Ryton, a tributary of the River Idle located in the catchment of the River Trent. The section visited was in and upstream of Anston Stones Wood, a Site of Special Scientific Interest (for limestone woodland habitat) and Local Nature Reserve (LNR). A local management committee of volunteers looks after the LNR and carries out maintenance work. The section of the brook inspected lies between approximate grid references SK 51551 84330 (upstream) and SK 52550 83722 (downstream). The visit was at the request of David Newborough of the Environment Agency to discuss options for river habitat improvement within the context of Water Framework Directive (WFD) targets. The WFD waterbody ID is GB104028058210 (Anston Brook from Source to River Ryton). The current overall status is poor (very certain); ecological status is poor because of poor invertebrate status which is attributed to poor water quality (high levels of ammonia, phosphate and poor dissolved oxygen). Anston sewage works has recently been closed and a pumping station now operates to take effluent to another plant for treatment.
    [Show full text]