DOCSLIB.ORG

WP3 England Rotherham Town Centre FMS MARE North Sea Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WP3 England Rotherham Town Centre FMS MARE North Sea Region Managing Adaptive REsponses to changing flood risk, Rotherham town centre flood risk management strategy development Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council in collaboration with the partners of the MARE project FV 130304 FV 130304 List of stakeholders Interest Knowledge Regulators Planning bodies development Ref. Stakeholder t No. Developers Long term ownership life Wild Heritage Environment Water quality Water quantity Emergency plannning Strategy planners Development control controlBuilding Road/Transpor Initiators Create state of the art knowledge knowledge maintenance Public authorities and water utility organisations A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D A D 1 National Government 2 Environment Agency 3 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Sheffield City Council Infrastructure owners : gas, electricity, telecom, 8 railway 9 Property owners 10 Interest groups - Consultants, architects 11 Knowledge institutions - University of Sheffield 12 Citizens, organisations and communities FV 130304 FV 130304 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Aims and objectives ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Regulations, procedures and standards .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 The European Union ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 UK Central Government ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 The Environment Agency ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.4 Local Authorities (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Summary and Way Forward .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Timeline and flow diagram ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 2 Details .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Analysis and assessment ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.1.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessments .......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Problem Definition ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Options Considered........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 2.4 Selected Option .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 2.5 Implementation ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 2.5.1 Rotherham Renaissance Flood Alleviation Scheme Phase One ............................................................................................................................. 19 2.5.2 Rotherham Renaissance Flood Alleviation Scheme Phase Two............................................................................................................................. 21 FV 130304 2.5.3 The Flood Risk Toolkit ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 2.5.4 External Advice – The Lower Don Valley and Yorkshire and Humberside Learning and Action Alliances ............................................................ 23 2.5.5 External Advice – MARE ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.6 Performance and Effects of the Selected Option .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.6.1 Overtopping ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.6.2 Breaching of Defences ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.6.3 Climate Change Adaptation ................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 3 Review .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Discussion ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Learning Points ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.4 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 FV 130304 background of catastrophic global economic application of the five individual work downturn, leading to a programme of packages and a thought process which entails: 1 Introduction swingeing public sector cuts. Over the past decade, Rotherham Considering whether flood defences need Metropolitan Borough Council (RMBC) has The legislative requirement are therefore to be provided in the first place; if so sought to develop a flood alleviation policy juxtaposed with increased Local Authority (LA) where and to what degree or extent. against a background of almost responsibility in the fields of climate change in Ensuring that flood defences are not unprecedented environmental and economic general and flood alleviation in particular, at a purely utilitarian and that they bring turmoil. time of vastly reduced funding and staff resources. environmental enhancement as well as In the United Kingdom (UK) a series of solving the need for flood alleviation. abnormally wet summer and autumn events, Moreover, this is a burgeoning discipline, Ensuring that climate change and the possibly linked to climate change has led to reversing a forty year trend of reducing local need to counter-act over-topping or flooding, in some part of the country in almost authority involvement in water management breaching are incorporated into flood every year between 2000 and 2012 with major in the UK. This national policy has reduced defence works. events occurring in 2000, 2007, 2009 and local authority experience and expertise in the field of flood risk management to minimal 2012. Application of the individual work packages levels. In order to redress the situation, RMBC contained within MARE has also proved These events,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021
    Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final June 2016 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager 7 June 2016 Local Flood Risk Management Derek
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
    River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Humberhead Levels Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Management Plan the Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan
    catchment management plan The Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan he catchment of the Rivers Idle and Torne The key objectives of the plan are therefore to: T covers an area of 1 307 km2 within north Nottinghamshire and south Humberside and has • Establish a balance between the demands of a resident population of about 625,000 people. irrigation and abstraction and the needs of the environment. Man has impacted on the catchment since early times and the area has a rich industrial and • Ensure that the quality of minewater archaeological heritage. The heavily urbanised discharged to the rivers is of a and industrial headwaters contrast sharply with standard appropriate to the needs of the very flat, open and rural lower reaches nearer downstream users. to the confluences with the River Trent. Man's influence is also apparent here though where • Initiate and promote proposals for the drains have been cut and rivers re-routed and improvement of habitats for fisheries straightened to produce highly productive and conservation. agricultural areas. • Ensure that the standard of flood protection The catchment is predominantly rural with the is appropriate to the needs of the adjacent exception of the headwaters, as described above. land use, consistent with the vision. The River Idle and its tributaries flow through the heavily industrialised towns of Mansfield and The achievement of this vision is dependant on Worksop, then through the rolling forested areas the committed and enthusiastic cooperation of of Sherwood Forest and the Dukeries. The River others. Some objectives are common goals, while Torne rises on the edge of Doncaster and others may require a degree of compromise flows through the flat areas of low land, between differing demands on the resources of characterised by the Isle of Axholme, Thorne the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ironworks and Iron Monuments Forges Et
    IRONWORKS AND IRON MONUMENTS FORGES ET MONUMENTS EN FER I( ICCROM i ~ IRONWORKS AND IRON MONUMENTS study, conservation and adaptive use etude, conservation et reutilisation de FORGES ET MONUMENTS EN FER Symposium lronbridge, 23-25 • X •1984 ICCROM rome 1985 Editing: Cynthia Rockwell 'Monica Garcia Layout: Azar Soheil Jokilehto Organization and coordination: Giorgio Torraca Daniela Ferragni Jef Malliet © ICCROM 1985 Via di San Michele 13 00153 Rome RM, Italy Printed in Italy Sintesi Informazione S.r.l. CONTENTS page Introduction CROSSLEY David W. The conservation of monuments connected with the iron and steel industry in the Sheffield region. 1 PETRIE Angus J. The No.1 Smithery, Chatham Dockyard, 1805-1984 : 'Let your eye be your guide and your money the last thing you part with'. 15 BJORKENSTAM Nils The Swedish iron industry and its industrial heritage. 37 MAGNUSSON Gert The medieval blast furnace at Lapphyttan. 51 NISSER Marie Documentation and preservation of Swedish historic ironworks. 67 HAMON Francoise Les monuments historiques et la politique de protection des anciennes forges. 89 BELHOSTE Jean Francois L'inventaire des forges francaises et ses applications. 95 LECHERBONNIER Yannick Les forges de Basse Normandie : Conservation et reutilisation. A propos de deux exemples. 111 RIGNAULT Bernard Forges et hauts fourneaux en Bourgogne du Nord : un patrimoine au service de l'identite regionale. 123 LAMY Yvon Approche ethnologique et technologique d'un site siderurgique : La forge de Savignac-Ledrier (Dordogne). 149 BALL Norman R. A Canadian perspective on archives and industrial archaeology. 169 DE VRIES Dirk J. Iron making in the Netherlands. 177 iii page FERRAGNI Daniela, MALLIET Jef, TORRACA Giorgio The blast furnaces of Capalbio and Canino in the Italian Maremma.
    [Show full text]
  • 02/06/08 Cabinet Member for Regeneration And
    1ACABINET MEMBER FOR REGENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - 02/06/08 CABINET MEMBER FOR REGENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Monday, 2nd June, 2008 Present:- Councillor Smith (in the Chair); Councillor Walker (Senior Adviser) Also in attendance: Councillors Swift (Vice-Chair, Regeneration Scrutiny Panel), Pickering (Chair, Planning Board) and Dodson (Vice-Chair, Planning Board) An apology for absence was received from Councillors Boyes. 19. MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE TOWN CENTRE EVENTS GROUP HELD ON 19TH MAY, 2008 Consideration was given to theth minutes of the meeting of the Town Centre Events Group held on 19 May, 2008. Resolved:- That the minutes be noted. 20. REPRESENTATIVES ON OUTSIDE BODIES/MEMBERSHIP OF GROUPS/PANELS ETC - 2008/2009 MUNICIPAL YEAR Consideration was given to the appointment of representatives on outside bodies and membership of the Council’s Groups/Panels etc for the 2008/2009 Municipal Year. Resolved:- (1) That the following appointments to outside bodies be made:- ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION TRADES (Formerly Mr. R. Poundford, Head of RiDO) To propose:- Mr. Paul Woodcock, Director of Planning and Regeneration CHESTERFIELD CANAL PARTNERSHIP Councillor J. Whysall CYCLE ENGLAND – CYCLING CHAMPION Councillor Barron DEARNE AND DOVE INTERNAL DRAINAGE BOARD Councillor F. Hodgkiss HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE TRADES – CONSULTATION MEETINGS Cabinet Member and Senior Advisor from Regeneration and Development Services, plus the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Licensing Board (Councillors Smith, Walker, Wootton and F. Wright) KIVETON PARK MINERS’ WELFARE GROUNDS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CABINET MEMBER FOR REGENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - 02/06/08 2A Councillor Whysall NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH MARKET AUTHORITIES Councillor G. Smith PLANNING AID COMMUNITY CHAMPION Vice-Chair, Planning Board - Councillor Dodson ROTHERHAM ARTS CHARITY/ROTHERHAM ARTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (6 places available) Trustees:- currently Councillors Smith, Walker, (Cabinet Member and Senior Adviser); Councillor Swift (from Regeneration Scrutiny Panel) and St.
    [Show full text]
  • 151207 402-05891-00001 Licensed Abstractions.Xlsx
    IGas Energy Appendix 9/2: December 2015 Tinkers Lane 1 Licensed Abstractions SLR Ref: 402-05891-00001 Distance from Ref No Licence Number Licence Holder Grid Reference Type Source Purpose Annual Quanity (m3) Site (km) A1 Mineral Products - General Use (Medium Loss) 44825 03/28/77/0048/2/R01 The Rotherham, Sand & Gravel Co Ltd SK 65120 889 3.6 Groundwater Lagoon A2 Mineral Products - Mineral Washing 273900 Borehole - Sherwood A3 MD/028/0075/008 F L Green and Sons Ltd SK 62309 820 4.3 Groundwater Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 126000 Sandstone A4 03/28/77/0041 Bawtry Farms Limited SK 64720 884 3.1 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 72133 A5 36067 03/28/77/0033 D Skelton & Sons SK 64720 884 3.1 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct A6 32433 A7 SK 6660 8872 3.7 03/28/77/0031 H W Smith& Sons Groundwater Gravel Pit Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 9092 A8 SK 6715 8884 4.1 A9 90920 03/28/77/0028 Grange Farm (Barnby Moor) SK 66123 847 1.2 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct A10 55690 A11 03/28/77/0025 W Moore & Son SK 6479 8687 1.5 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 45461 A12 03/28/77/0020 Mattersey Rifle & Pistol Club SK 684 878 4.2 Groundwater Borehole Extractive Mineral Washing 32731.2 A13 03/28/77/0001 W Moore & Son SK 627 863 2.5 Groundwater Borehole Agricultural - Spray Irrigation - Direct 68190 A14 Agriculture - Spray Irrigation - Direct 54553 03/28/76/0023 Peter Taylor (Oldcotes) Ltd SK 6060 8720 4.8 Groundwater Borehole
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1
    Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1 June 2008 (Final) Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Civic Building Walker Place ROTHERHAM Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (SFRA) Level 1 (this page intentionally left blank) June 2008 (Final) Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (SFRA) Level 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 1. The Borough of Rotherham is situated in South Yorkshire spanning the valleys of the River Don, the River Rother, and the River Dearne. Historically development has concentrated around the river and canal network, providing critical water supplies and transport linkages to support the coal mining and steel industries. Decline in these industries since the 1980s has resulted in a need for economic activity to be restored within the Borough. An overview of the Borough is provided in Figure A. 2. It is important to recognise that some of those areas that are at risk of flooding from rivers within the Borough are under pressure from future development. It is essential therefore that the Council are in a position to take informed decisions, providing a careful balance between the risk of flooding and other unrelated planning constraints that may place pressure upon ‘at risk’ areas. The Rotherham SFRA endeavours to provide specific advice to assist the Council in this regard. 3. This report (and the supporting mapping) represents the Level 1 SFRA1, and should be used by the Council to inform the application of the Sequential Test. Following the application of the Sequential Test, it may be necessary to develop a Level 2 SFRA2 should it be shown that proposed allocations fall within a flood affected area of the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Worksop – November 2019
    APPENDIX J SECTION 19 REPORT – WORKSOP – NOVEMBER 2019 Introduction Section 19 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 states: 1. On becoming aware of a flood in its area, a lead local flood authority must, to the extent that it considers it necessary or appropriate, investigate: (a) Which Risk Management Authorities (RMAs) have relevant flood risk management functions. (b) Whether each of those Risk Management Authorities has exercised, or is proposing to exercise, those functions in response to the flood. 2. Where an authority carries out an investigation under subsection (1) of Section 19 it must:- (a) Publish the results of its investigation. (b) Notify any relevant Risk Management Authorities. 3. The objective of this report is to investigate which Risk Management Authority had relevant flood risk management functions during the flooding in November 2019 and whether the relevant RMAs have exercised, or propose to exercise, their risk management functions (as per section 19(1) of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010). 4. The Risk Management Authorities with a duty to respond to this flooding incident are, Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC) as Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA), Nottinghamshire County Council as Highways Authority (Via East Midlands Ltd.), the Environment Agency (EA), Nottinghamshire Police, Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue, Severn Trent Water (STW) and Bassetlaw District Council (BDC). 5. It should be noted that this duty to investigate does not guarantee that flooding problems will be resolved and cannot force others into action. Background 6. On the 7th November 2019, parts of the East Midlands experienced a month’s worth of rainfall in just 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Cycling Map
    6 A 6 N V T O 4 W 3 E B Bentley Moor E A R N H 2 E 8 L O Wood N R M E 2 C TH OA R D A OR D M N L IN W E I D E V S A N P L I V E BO E L EADO F T N IV O A M W IE S U R R N F H E E D T E H F V E L U R BE T E AR I Dunscroft M A R S L O UM EN O LO M L W V N O W C PA A NT A UTTERW R E RK G O L E N Y ORT T R W E Barnby Dun O R AV H UT U S Adwick D U D O A T EN L B Y R B U R AD A E M E WIC S IV A E K LA Common V T E C T NE E F N T A 9 H E U H V C PO 1 E S E A H N E C E R A AVE D I GTON I K T ENNIN R YN IN O K C L N U GSLE A I Y V Adwick Pk E T R E E B V L O N N D A A A A U LA Jun Sch A W D O C E K E L R K Barnby Dun Frickley OOD N E A R U V B E L W A A R T A E N E E S R E V T N A S N N A Common H V E R E C E H A Park Hill N U T A N F T A B D Playing Fields O SB U IN W D U E Almholme Hooton R Y SW Outwood IC A Grange AVENUE ADWICK K R 49 50 51 52 53 W54 55 56 57 Shaftholme 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 L M Town and country maps with hundreds of miles of routes E A A N Academy S N E T E N Grumble Hurst H Pagnell R H LA O I A O G N L R B LE STREET L M R G I OO P L S O T V O North Ridge L O E S O L R L E CLAYT U LAN V N A NE AN L ON L ALK H LA E E A ANE N GE B Community E R TPT SHAFT ME G PO ID E N HOL H C N R D R C D N O Q C E A E L E E A E Lound Hill L L X R S U E N A School T O S U K R RT E N 'S O D N L O T N M D G E A N O E A A S E B N ECT R V R Plantation R E O O N V S L V R ND U O O U L O R O A R A I I Toll Bar R E T A N L A V R O D ENT N M L R T A ESC D Almholme Field I E I G E A V R E D A EW E E O E C N V V T D IV E D I V I T G N S E E R R Prim Sch
    [Show full text]
  • North Eastern Railway Civil Engineering Drawings List
    North Eastern Railway Civil Engineering Drawings List Description: The collection includes a minority of architectural plans, along with drawings of structures such as bridges and viaducts, maps of permanent way routes and alterations, signalling plans and diagrams, with a variety of miscellaneous components for structures and infrastructure. The collection comprises approximately 3500 plans, diagrams and maps on paper, wax linen and linen- backed cartridge paper. System of arrangement: The original arrangement of the drawings has been lost and they derive from a wide variety of applications within the architectural and civil engineering genres. The drawings have therefore been listed in the rolls in which they were found, and every effort made to record the variety of numbering systems used at different times by the railway company departments involved in creating and storing the drawings, representative of the different types of drawing. There is no one single and consistent numbering arrangement. Physical Characteristics: The drawings survive in a variety of formats and sizes – there are wax linen tracings, colour washed linenbacked original office drawings, drawings on cartridge paper, blueprints and other copying processes. Administrative/Biographical History: The North Eastern Railway Company was formed in 1854 as an amalgamation of the York & North Midland Railway, the Leeds Northern Railway and the York, Newcastle & Berwick Railway. It continued to absorb other companies in the north eastern region of England over subsequent decades, including the Stockton & Darlington Railway, South Durham and Lancashire Union Railway and the West Hartlepool Railway. In 1923 the various railway companies of the United Kingdom were grouped into four large amalgamations.
    [Show full text]
  • English Fords Statistics (Dec19)
    Reconciliation of Geograph Photographs versus English Fords and Wetroads as at 20th June 2021 Id Name Grid Ref WR County Submitter Hits 3020116 Radwell Causeway TL0056 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 40 3069286 Ford and Packhorse Bridge at Sutton TL2247 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 98 3264116 Gated former Ford at North Crawley SP9344 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 61 3020108 Ford at Farndish SP9364 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 57 3020123 Felmersham Causeway SP9957 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 40 3020133 Ford at Clapham TL0352 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 95 3020073 Upper Dean Ford TL0467 ü Bedfordshire John Walton 154 5206262 Ford at Priory Country ParK TL0748 B Bedfordshire John Walton 87 3515781 Border Ford at Headley SU5263 ü Berkshire John Walton 103 3515770 Ford at Bagnor SU5469 ü Berkshire John Walton 48 3515707 Ford at Bucklebury SU5471 ü Berkshire John Walton 88 3515679 Ford and Riders at Bucklebury SU5470 ü Berkshire John Walton 127 3515650 Byway Ford at Stanford Dingley SU5671 ü Berkshire John Walton 52 3515644 Byway Ford at Stanford Dingley SU5671 ü Berkshire John Walton 55 3492617 Byway Ford at Hurst SU7874 ü Berkshire John Walton 82 3492594 Ford ar Burghfield Common SU6567 ü Berkshire John Walton 101 3492543 Ford at Jouldings Farm SU7563 ü Berkshire John Walton 74 3492407 Byway Ford at Arborfield Cross SU7667 ü Berkshire John Walton 168 3492425 Byway Ford at Arborfield Cross SU7667 ü Berkshire John Walton 177 3492446 Ford at Carter's Hill Farm SU7668 ü Berkshire John Walton 84 3492349 Ford at Gardners Green SU8266 ü Berkshire John Walton
    [Show full text]