DOCSLIB.ORG

Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update Final Report July 2015 47071849 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 January Draft report for client Ed Byers Jo Somerton Andrew Woodliffe 2015 comment Flood Risk Consultant Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Consultant Penelope Pickerin Flood Risk Consultant 2 July Final Report Ed Byers Jo Somerton Carl Pelling 2015 Flood Risk Consultant Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Consultant URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd Royal Court, Basil Close, Chesterfield, S41 7SL, United Kingdom. Phone: +44 (1246) 209221 Fax: +44 (1246) 209229 FINAL REPORT 47071849 July 2015 i Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Limitations AECOM and URS have now joined together as one company, and will be known as AECOM moving forward. Whilst the brand is AECOM and operate as one company, contracting entities (all of which are now wholly owned by AECOM) and lines of communication currently remain the same unless specifically agreed or communicated otherwise. URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Nottinghamshire County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (Proposal Number: 47065807, dated 21st August 2014). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between September 2014 and July 2015 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS’ attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward- looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Copyright © This Report is the copyright of URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. FINAL REPORT 47071849 July 2015 ii Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................... 1 1.2 Aims and Objectives........................................................ 2 1.3 SFRA Structure ................................................................ 3 2 STUDY AREA .................................................................... 5 2.1 General overview ............................................................. 5 2.2 Geology ............................................................................. 6 2.3 Current Minerals Extraction Situation ........................... 7 3 POLICY CONTEXT ......................................................... 10 3.2 Flood and Water Management Act ............................... 10 3.3 Amendments to policy on Sustainable Drainage Systems .......................................................................... 11 3.4 Flood Risk Regulations ................................................. 13 3.5 National Planning Policy ............................................... 14 3.6 Local Planning Policy .................................................... 17 3.7 The Water Framework Directive ................................... 20 4 LEVEL 1 SFRA METHODOLOGY .................................. 21 4.1 Overview ......................................................................... 21 4.2 Tasks ............................................................................... 21 4.3 Stakeholder Consultation ............................................. 21 4.4 Data/Information Requested ......................................... 23 4.5 Data Presentation .......................................................... 25 4.6 GIS Data Review ............................................................. 25 5 FLOOD RISK IN NOTTINGHAMSHIRE .......................... 42 5.1 Introduction .................................................................... 42 5.2 Requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework ...................................................................... 42 5.3 Historical Flooding ........................................................ 42 5.4 Fluvial Flooding ............................................................. 44 5.5 Surface Water Flooding................................................. 52 5.6 Groundwater Flooding .................................................. 53 5.7 Sewer Flooding .............................................................. 53 5.8 Artificial Sources – Canals and Reservoirs ................ 54 5.9 Existing Flood Risk Management in Nottinghamshire57 5.10 Flood Warning Areas ..................................................... 57 5.11 Emergency Planning and Flood Risk .......................... 59 5.12 Potential Future Minerals Sites and Flood Risk ......... 59 FINAL REPORT 47071849 July 2015 iii Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA 6 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT MEASURES .................. 62 6.1 Overview ......................................................................... 62 6.2 Residual Risk ................................................................. 62 6.3 Emergency Planning ..................................................... 63 6.4 Sustainable Flood Risk Management .......................... 63 6.5 Restoration of Minerals Sites ....................................... 64 7 NPPF SEQUENTIAL TEST GUIDANCE......................... 67 7.1 Overview ......................................................................... 67 7.2 Using the SFRA Maps, Data and GIS Layers .............. 71 7.3 How to apply the Sequential Test where there are gaps in data ............................................................................. 73 7.4 The Exception Test ........................................................ 74 7.5 What is a Level 2 SFRA? ............................................... 75 8 SITE SPECIFIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE ......................................................................................... 76 8.1 Introduction .................................................................... 76 8.2 When is a Flood Risk Assessment required? ............. 76 8.3 Scope of a Site-Specific Flood Risk Assessment ...... 76 8.4 Sequential Approach within Development Sites ........ 79 8.5 Surface Water Management .......................................... 79 8.6 Residual Risk ................................................................. 80 8.7 Summary ......................................................................... 80 9 SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ......................... 82 9.2 What are SuDS? ............................................................. 82 9.3 Why use SuDS? ............................................................. 85 9.4 The SuDS hierarchy ....................................................... 85 9.5 Infiltration SuDS ............................................................. 85 FINAL REPORT 47071849 July 2015 iv Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Table of Tables Table 1-1: NCC Planning Context for the SFRA: Relevant past and future planning documents .................... 2 Table 2-1: Approximate Areas for the Individual LPAs within Nottinghamshire ................................................ 5 Table 4-1: SFRA Mapping Contents ................................................................................................................ 25 Table 4-2: Detailed Modelled Flood Studies provided for use in the SFRA .................................................... 29 Table 4-3: Recommended national precautionary sensitivity ranges for peak rainfall intensity and peak river flow* ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 Table 4-4 Potential Allocation Mineral Extraction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lincolnshire Flood Risk and Drainage Management Framework
    AGENDA ITEM NO: 6 BOSTON BOROUGH COUNCIL REPORT TO CABINET 2nd June 2010 SUBJECT: LINCOLNSHIRE FLOOD RISK AND DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK PORTFOLIO HOLDER: COUNCILLOR RICHARD DUNGWORTH – REGENERATION, PLANNING, SPORT AND CULTURAL SERVICES REPORT BY: HEAD OF PLANNING AND STRATEGY Reason For Report: Following the introduction of the Flood & Water Management Act the Council is being asked to adopt a Lincolnshire Flood Risk and Drainage Management Framework. This is required in order to enable the provisions and requirements of the new Act to be properly implemented and co-ordinated throughout Lincolnshire, building on the extensive partnerships and close working already carried out between all the various agencies and bodies responsible for flood response, management and planning. Summary: The report advises the Cabinet of the development of a new partnership framework to provide improved co-ordination of flood risk management in Lincolnshire and to meet the requirements of the Flood and Water Management Act which was granted Royal Assent on 8th April 2010. The Act will implement several key recommendations of Sir Michael Pitt’s Review of the Summer 2007 floods. The new governance framework, with Lincolnshire County Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority, will build on existing good practice established through existing local drainage groups, and increase the capacity of partners to provide a consistent and co-ordinated approach to flood risk management across Lincolnshire. Recommendation(s): That Cabinet: a) adopts the Lincolnshire Flood Risk and Drainage Management Framework as laid out and detailed in Appendix B of this report and in line with similar agreements being put in place by other Lincolnshire Councils and partner agencies b) allows for confirmation of details of representation on the partnership groupings by the framework Strategy Group Reasons for Recommendations: To prepare for the requirements set out in the Flood and Water Management Act 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Visit Rivers Meden and Maun, Thoresby Estate
    Advisory Visit Rivers Meden and Maun, Thoresby Estate, Nottinghamshire January 2018 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit undertaken by Tim Jacklin of the Wild Trout Trust to the Rivers Meden and Maun on the Thoresby Estate, Nottinghamshire on 4th January, 2018. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Andrew Dobson (River Warden, Thoresby Estate) and Ryan Taylor (Environment Agency). Normal convention is applied throughout the report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left hand bank (LHB) or right hand bank (RHB) whilst looking downstream. 2.0 Catchment / Fishery Overview The River Meden rises to the north of Mansfield and flows east-north- eastwards through a largely rural catchment. The River Maun rises in the conurbation of Mansfield and flows north-eastwards past Ollerton to join the River Meden at Conjure Alders (SK6589872033). The rivers then separate again and re-join approximately 6km downstream near West Drayton (SK7027875118) to form the River Idle (a Trent tributary with its confluence at West Stockwith SK7896894718). Both rivers flow over a geology comprising sandstone with underlying coal measures and there is a history of extensive deep coal mining in the area. Table 1 gives a summary of data collected by the Environment Agency to assess the quality of the rivers for the Water Framework Directive. Both rivers appear to have a similar ecological quality and closer inspection of the categories which make up this assessment reveal that fish and invertebrates were both ‘high’ and ‘good’ for the Meden and Maun respectively in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021
    Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final June 2016 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager 7 June 2016 Local Flood Risk Management Derek
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire County Council Sherwood Living Legend Geo-Environmental Desk Study Report
    Nottinghamshire County Council Sherwood Living Legend Geo-environmental Desk Study Report This report is prepared by Atkins Limited for the sole and exclusive use of Nottinghamshire County Council in response to their particular instructions. No liability is accepted for any costs claims or losses arising from the use of this report or any part thereof for any purpose other than that for which it was specifically prepared or by any party other than Nottingham County Council. Nottinghamshire County Council Sherwood Forest Living Legend Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Nottinghamshire County Council Sherwood Living Legend Desk Study Report JOB NUMBER: 5048377 DOCUMENT REF: Sherwood Living Legend Desk Study v2.doc - Draft for Client approval TJC JPB MP NAW Dec-06 1 Final TJC JPB MP NAW Jan-06 Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Revision Purpose Description Nottinghamshire County Council Sherwood Living Legend Geo-environmental Desk Study Report CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Information Reviewed 1-1 1.3 Scope of Works 1-2 2. SITE AREA 2-1 2.1 Site Location 2-1 2.2 Site Description 2-1 2.3 Adjacent Areas 2-1 2.4 Historical Development 2-2 2.5 Archaeology 2-4 2.6 National Monument Records 2-4 3. PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION 3-1 3.1 Solid and Drift Geology 3-1 3.2 BGS Borehole Logs 3-2 3.3 Hydrology 3-2 3.4 Hydrogeology 3-2 3.5 Mining 3-3 3.6 Radon 3-4 3.7 Additional Geo-environmental Information. 3-4 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham City Council
    Greater Nottingham and Ashfield Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report February 2010 Creating the environment for business Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by Entec (© Entec UK Limited 2010) save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Entec under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Entec. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third-party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by Entec at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third-party who is able to access it by any means. Entec excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or death resulting from our negligence, for fraud or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally exclude liability.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire Further electoral review December 2005 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 15 2 Current electoral arrangements 19 3 Submissions received 23 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 25 Electorate figures 26 Council size 26 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 28 a Clipstone, Edwinstowe and Ollerton wards 29 b Bilsthorpe, Blidworth, Farnsfield and Rainworth wards 30 c Boughton, Caunton and Sutton-on-Trent wards 32 d Collingham & Meering, Muskham and Winthorpe wards 32 e Newark-on-Trent (five wards) 33 f Southwell town (three wards) 35 g Balderton North, Balderton West and Farndon wards 36 h Lowdham and Trent wards 38 Conclusions 39 Parish electoral arrangements 39 5 What happens next? 43 6 Mapping 45 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 47 B Code of practice on written consultation 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification of Seismic Surveys – INEOS Upstream Ltd Derbyshire County Council
    Notification of Seismic Surveys – INEOS Upstream Ltd Derbyshire County Council May 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Justification for Permitted Development 6 3. Environment of the Survey Area 11 4. Survey Methodology 20 5. Summary and Requirements for Proposed Seismic Survey 38 Appendix 1: List of Designations and Sensitivities Appendix 2: Seismic Source Safe Operating Distances and PPV Monitoring Appendix 3: Preliminary Environmental Method Statement Contact Matthew Sheppard [email protected] May 2017 1. Introduction 1.1 Summary 1.1 This report is submitted to Derbyshire County Council to outline INEOS Upstream Ltd.’s (hereafter INEOS) proposed geophysical (seismic) survey operations in the area shown in Map 1. In total the survey area covers 250.7 km2 (approximately 25,000 ha). Derbyshire County Council is the Mineral Planning Authority (MPA) for 90.8 km2 of the whole survey area. 1.2 This report should be read with the accompanying document “INEOS Shale Seismic Surveying Methodology: East Midlands Seismic Survey 2017” – hereafter termed the Method Statement, which outlines the survey methods to be used and embedded environmental operative measures in place. Environmental operative measures for site specific environmental considerations are outlined in Section 4.6 and Appendices 1-3 of this report. The 3D seismic survey that INEOS proposed is described in Section 4.2 of this report. Map 1: Boundary and Location of Seismic Survey Area 1.3 The proposed survey area is located within INEOS’s Petroleum Exploration and Development Licence areas (PEDLs) 299, 300, 304, 307, 308 and 309 which were awarded to INEOS in July 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Idle Catchment Partnership Newsletter June 2019
    Catchment Partnership Newsletter June 2019 Firstly, a very big thank you to everyone who responded so promptly and enthusiastically to our request for confirmation of your continued support for Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust to continue as Catchment Hosts for 2019/20. We have submitted our application and are confident that we will soon have our agreement confirmed. It is fantastic to have such a great response reflecting the value of the River Idle Catchment Partnership to the organisations and individuals involved. Run-off; spotting the A spotlight on……Soil signs and reporting Did you know that soil holds 3 times as much carbon as the atmosphere, reduces the risk of the problem... flooding by absorbing water, is a wildlife habitat, A sunny May has given way to a wet and delivers 95% of global food supplies1? Keeping June providing plenty of soils on the land where they belong and not in our opportunity to get out and about in river systems is a key issue for the catchment your local patch to see if you can partnership and good soil health can be vital in spot signs of run off which could achieving this. We are fortunate to have number of impact our watercourses where farming advisors working in our region to sediment and other pollutants are champion good soil health which depends on a involved. If you are particularly range of chemical, physical and biological factors. concerned, we would encourage A recent EA report outlines current and future you to take photos and report any pressures on soil health and highlights that the incidents to the EA’s hotline on government's 25 Year Environment Plan states that 0800 80 70 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Annual Report 1996/97
    1aA' AiO Cf E n v ir o n m e n t ' » . « / Ag e n c y Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Annual Report 1996/97 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 THE FOLLOWING REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE WATER RESOURCES ACT 1991 Ron Linfield Front Cover Illustration Area Manager (Northern) Aerial View of Mablethorpe North End Showing the 1996/97 Kidding Scheme May 1997 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 136076 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 CONTENTS Item No Page 1. Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Members 1 2. Officers Serving the Committee 3 3. Map of Catchment Area and Flood Defence Data 4 - 5 4. Staff Structure - Northern Area 6 5. Area Manager’s Introduction 7 6. Operations Report a) Capital Works 10 b) Maintenance Works 20 c) Rainfall, River Flows and Flooding and Flood Warning 22 7. Conservation and Flood Defence 30 8. Flood Defence and Operations Revenue Account 31 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE R J EPTON Esq - Chairman Northolme Hall, Wainfleet, Skegness, Lincolnshire Appointed bv the Regional Flood Defence Committee R H TUNNARD Esq - Vice Chairman Witham Cottage, Boston West, Boston, Lincolnshire D C HOYES Esq The Old Vicarage, Stixwould, Lincoln R N HERRING Esq College Farm, Wrawby, Brigg, South Humberside P W PRIDGEON Esq Willow Farm, Bradshaws Lane, Hogsthorpe, Skegness Lincolnshire M CRICK Esq Lincolnshire Trust for Nature Conservation Banovallum House, Manor House Street, Homcastle Lincolnshire PROF. J S PETHICK - Director Cambs Coastal Research
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire. 59
    DIRECTORY.) NOTTINGHAMSHIRE. EDWINSTOWE • 59 • of the Bishop of Manchester, and held since 1884 by the Sexton, George Markham. Rev. William John Sparrow H.A. of University College, Durham, who resides at Gamston. Lieut.-Col. Henry Letters through Retford, which is the nearest telegraph office, arrive at 8 a.m.; the nearest money order office is Denison R.E., J".P. of Eaton Hall, is lord of the manor and principal landowner. The soil is clayey and sandy loam ; London road, Retford. Wall Letter Box cleared at 5.3() subsoil, marl and limestone. The land is chiefly arable, p.m. on week days only principally growing wheat and barley. The area is 1,519 Public Elementary School, built by the late H. Bridgeman­ acres of land and 7 of water ; assessable value, £2,961 ; the Simpson esq. for 60 children; average attendance, 50; population in 1901 was 144. Mrs. Whitesmith. mistress Denison Lieut.-Col. Henry R.E., ;r.P. Andersen Charles, farmer Spooner William, farmer Eaton hall Booth John, farmer • Tinker Charles, farmer, Eaton grange COMMERCIAL. Cole William, farmer Wheeldon Robert, farmer Allen Henry 'Villiam, cowkeeper Curtis Edwin & John, fanners EDINGLEY is a pleasant village and parish, near the chapel, erected in 1838, was re-seated and a new porch river Greet, on the road between Southwell and Mans- added in 1898, and affords sittings for 80 persons. The field, with a station called Kirklington and Edingley on charities amount to £7 8s. yearly. The Manor House is. the Mansfield and Newark line of the Midland railway, one an old building, now occupied as a farmhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • A Topographic Earthwork Survey of Thynghowe. Hanger Hill, Nottinghamshire
    A topographic earthwork survey of Thynghowe. Hanger Hill, Nottinghamshire. NCA-016 Andy Gaunt Nottinghamshire Community Archaeology Nottinghamshire County Council Contributors The survey was undertaken by Andy Gaunt, Emily Gillott and Lorraine Horsley of Nottinghamshire County Council Community Archaeology along with members of the Friends of Thynghowe group. The surveyors: Stuart Reddish, Lynda Mallett, Steve Horne and Paul Walsh The Friends of Thynghowe group: http://www.thynghowe.org.uk/ Acknowledgements • Andy Norman and the Forestry Commission for access to the site. • Nottinghamshire County Council Local Improvement Scheme for funding the project • The Friends of Thynghowe group Photograph front cover: Nottinghamshire Community Archaeologists surveying the top of Thynghowe reproduced with permission from Lynda Mallett ©. From http://www.flickr.com/photos/lyndamallett/ (at time of report). Archive Location Nottinghamshire Historic Environment Record, Nottinghamshire County Council, Trent Bridge House, Fox Road, West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, NG29BJ. Contact Details Nottinghamshire Community Archaeology, Nottinghamshire County Council, Trent Bridge House, Fox Road, West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, NG29BJ. [email protected] 2 Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Site location, geology and topography 5 3. Historical background 5 4. Aims and purposes of the evaluation 6 5. Methodology 7 5.1. Topographic survey methodology 7 5.1.1. Equipment 7 5.1.2. Control of survey 8 5.1.3. Topographic survey methodology 8 5.1.4. Objective survey 8 5.1.5. Subjective Survey 9 5.1.6. Data preparation and analysis 9 5.2. Level 1 walkover survey methodology 10 6. Results 10 6.1. Topographic survey 10 6.1.1. Hachure Plan 10 6.1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Nether Langwith Parish Council
    NETHER LANGWITH PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES of the Meeting of the Parish Council held at the Village Hall on Thursday 8 October 2015 Present : Cllr M Middleton in the chair, Cllr W Bryan, Cllr L Malkan, Cllr G Staniforth, Cllr A Stevenson, Cllr R Stockton and Cllr J Ogle. 1. Apologies Apologies were received from Cllr K Dukes. 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 10 September 2015. The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on the 10 September 2015 were taken as read and accepted as a true record. The Chair signed them accordingly. 3. Matters Arising From the Minutes The roof of the village hall is still leaking into the toilet. Cllr Bryan will take a look at it. The problem with the Stagecoach service 82 has now eased. 4. Correspondence 4.1 BDC - notice of disposal of several electricity sub-station sites by Eon, including the one in Fairfield Close – noted.. 5. County Councillor’s Report Cllr Ogle reported that although the Site Allocations Plan had not been adopted, there was a new 3 year plan. 6. District Councillor’s Report. In the absence of Cllr Dukes there was no report. 7. Accounts for Payment. The Clerk reported that the following payments had been made or were due for payment by direct bank transfer or by cheque since the last meeting. It was resolved to approve the payments. mins-oct-15.doc / 1 Payee Reason Amount £ R Busby Aug/Sep Wages 87.32 Eon Electricity 16.01 Eon Gas 8.44 Acer Grounds Maint. Grass Cutting 2015 1976.00 B Woodcock Sal Sept 2015 201.12 HMRC Tax Jul/Sep 15 174.80 Mrs D Wakeling Wages Sept 15 65.00 8.
    [Show full text]