DOCSLIB.ORG

Year 2014 Gulfwide Emissions Inventory Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Year 2014 Gulfwide Emissions Inventory Study OCS Study BOEM 2017-044 Year 2014 Gulfwide Emissions Inventory Study U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2017-044 Year 2014 Gulfwide Emissions Inventory Study Authors D. Wilson R. Billings R. Chang S. Enoch B. Do H. Perez J. Sellers Prepared under BOEM Contract M13PC00005 by Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 200 Morrisville, NC 27560 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior New Orleans, LA Bureau of Ocean Energy Management June 2017 Gulf of Mexico OCS Region DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Eastern Research Group, Inc. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this Environmental Studies Program report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program Information System website and search on OCS Study BOEM 2017-044. This report can be viewed at select Federal Depository Libraries. It can also be obtained from the National Technical Information Service; the contact information is below. US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Rd. Springfield, Virginia 22312 Phone: (703) 605-6000, 1 (800) 553-6847 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Website: http://www.ntis.gov/ CITATION Wilson, D., R. Billings, R. Chang, S. Enoch, B. Do, H. Perez, and J. Sellers. 2017. Year 2014 gulfwide emissions inventory study. US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA. OCS Study BOEM 2017-044. 275 pp. ABOUT THE COVER The graphic on the cover depicts the calendar year 2014 estimated oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions for all sources in the Gulf of Mexico region, including all platform and non-platform sources, oil and gas related and otherwise. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have been possible without the contributions of the following staff at Eastern Research Group, Inc.: Karla Faught, Steve Mendenhall, Regi Oommen, and Jody Tisano. Assistance was also provided by the staff of COMM Engineering: Stephanie Myers and Rachelle Suir, and Brian Boyer with BTGap, LLC. ii ABSTRACT This report presents the results of a calendar year 2014 air pollutant emissions inventory for Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil and gas production sources in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) west of 87.5 degrees longitude, as well as other sources that are not associated with oil and gas production. Pollutants covered in the inventory are the criteria air pollutants—carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter-10 (PM10), particulate matter-2.5 (PM2.5), PM precursor ammonia (NH3), ozone precursor volatile organic compounds, and major GHGs—carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). This is the first inventory cycle to include Pb and NH3. Details are provided on the emission estimation methods for all sources. This report is the fifth in a series of GOM OCS emissions inventories developed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). Past emissions inventories include emissions estimates for calendar years 2000, 2005, 2008, and 2011. The 2014 inventory results indicate that OCS oil and gas production platforms and production- related vessels and helicopters account for 99% of total methane emissions, 72% of carbon monoxide emissions, 56% of volatile organic compound emissions, 36% of nitrogen oxide emissions, 30% of particulate matter emissions, and 12% of sulfur dioxide emissions in the GOM inventory. Comparisons of the emission estimates between the BOEM calendar year 2011 inventory and the 2014 inventory show a decrease in all emission estimates for 2014. The emission estimates for some sources that are not associated with oil and gas production increased, particularly commercial marine vessels. This is due to a more complete assessment of the vessels transiting the GOM using the automatic identification system (AIS). The 2014 emission estimates for oil and natural gas production platform and non-platform oil and gas- related sources show a decrease in all emission estimates between 2011 and 2014 with a 73% decrease in SO2, a 68% decrease in PM, a 60% decrease in NOx, and a 17% decrease in CH4 emissions. This report also presents the results of a detailed emission trends analysis that analyzed BOEM inventories prepared for calendar years 2000 through 2014. The findings indicate that overall, emissions are largely affected by three factors: activity and production levels, changes in inventory methodologies, and improvements in the emission factors used to estimate emissions. The total production trend to emissions does not hold true for 2014, as higher production was paired with decreased emissions and number of platforms. Deepwater platforms account for an increasing portion of the emissions, despite only minor changes in the number of these platforms. At the conclusion of this report, the limitations associated with the development of the 2014 inventory, and recommendations for future improvements are presented. iii CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... ii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Contents ......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xii Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................... xvi Equation Unit Definitions .......................................................................................................... xviii Overview ...................................................................................................................................... xix 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope and Purpose of This Study ................................................................................... 3 1.3 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Report Organization ....................................................................................................... 4 2. DATA COLLECTION FOR PLATFORM SOURCES ........................................................ 7 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Improvement of the GOADS Data Collection Software ................................................ 7 2.3 Working with Users ........................................................................................................ 7 2.4 GOADS Quality Assurance/Quality Control ................................................................. 7 3. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL .............................................................. 9 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Checking File Integrity ................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Equipment Summary Checks ....................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 User-Level Summary ...................................................................................... 11 3.3.2 Structure-Level Summary ............................................................................... 11 3.3.3 Equipment-Level Summary ............................................................................ 12 3.4 QA/QC CHECKS ......................................................................................................... 12 3.4.1 Pre-Processing................................................................................................. 12 3.4.2 Equipment Survey Consistency ...................................................................... 14 3.4.3 Data Range Checks ......................................................................................... 14 3.4.4 Stream Analysis Between Certain Equipment ................................................ 15 3.4.5 Application of Surrogate Values ..................................................................... 15 3.4.6 Post-Processing of Surrogates......................................................................... 15 3.4.7 Revisions by Equipment Type ........................................................................ 18 3.4.8 Incorporation of Draft
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States District Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division
    Case 4:10-md-02185 Document 113 Filed in TXSD on 02/14/11 Page 1 of 182 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re BP plc Securities Litigation No. 4:10-md-02185 Honorable Keith P. Ellison LEAD PLAINTIFFS NEW YORK AND OHIO’S CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR ALL PURCHASERS OF BP SECURITIES FROM JANUARY 16, 2007 THROUGH MAY 28, 2010 Case 4:10-md-02185 Document 113 Filed in TXSD on 02/14/11 Page 2 of 182 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ........................................................................................11 III. THE PARTIES ..................................................................................................................11 A. Plaintiffs .................................................................................................................11 B. Defendants .............................................................................................................12 C. Non-Party ...............................................................................................................17 IV. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................17 A. BP’s Relevant Operations ......................................................................................17 B. BP’s Process Safety Controls Were Deficient Prior to the Class Period ...............18
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Observations at Hydrocarbon Drilling Locations: Contributions from the SERPENT Project After 120 Field Visits Andrew Gates University of Southampton
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2017 Deep-sea observations at hydrocarbon drilling locations: contributions from the SERPENT Project after 120 field visits Andrew Gates University of Southampton Mark Benfield Louisiana State University David Booth University of Technology Sydney Ashley Fowler University of Technology Sydney Danielle Skropeta University of Wollongong, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Publication Details Gates, A. R., Benfield, M. C., Booth, D. J., Fowler, A. M., Skropeta, D. & Jones, D. O.B.. (2017). Deep-sea observations at hydrocarbon drilling locations: contributions from the SERPENT Project after 120 field visits. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 137 463-479. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Deep-sea observations at hydrocarbon drilling locations: contributions from the SERPENT Project after 120 field visits Abstract The ERS PENT Project has been running for over ten years. In this time scientists from universities and research institutions have made more than 120 visits to oil rigs, drill ships and survey vessels operated by 16 oil companies, in order to work with the industry's Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV). Visits have taken place in Europe, North and South America, Africa and Australasia at water depths from 100 m to nearly 3000 m. The project has directly produced >40 peer reviewed publications and data from the project's >2600 entry online image and video archive have been used in many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231)
    UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT August 5, 2019 MEMORANDUM To: Public Information (MS 5030) From: Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231) Subj ect: Public Information copy of plan Control # S-07968 Type Supplemental Exploration Plan Lease(s) OCS-G36134 Elock - 629 Mississippi Canyon Area Operator LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. Description Subsea Well C and C-ALT Rig Type Not Found Attached is a copy of the subject plan. It has been deemed submitted as of this date and is under review for approval Leslie Wilson Plan Coordinator Site Type/Name Botm Lse/Area/Blk Surface Location Surf Lse/Area/Blk WELL/C G36134/MC/629 6100 FNL, 5062 FEL G36134/MC/629 WELL/C-ALT G36134/MC/629 6100 FNL, 5112 FEL G36134/MC/629 LLOG EXPLORATION OFFSHORE, L.L.C. 1001 Ochsner Boulevard, Suite 100 Covington, Louisiana 70433 SUPPLEMENTAL EXPLORATION PLAN OCS-G 36134 LEASE MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLOCK 629 Prepared By: Sue Sachitana Regulatory Specialist LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. 985-801-4300-Office 985-801-4716-Direct [email protected] Date: July 10, 2019 LLOG EXPLORATION OFFSHORE, L.L.C. SUPPLEMENTAL EXPLORATION PLAN OCS-G 36134 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLOCK 629 APPENDIX A Plan Contents APPENDIX B General Information APPENDIX C Geological, Geophysical Information APPENDIX D H2S Information APPENDIX E Biological, Physical and Socioeconomic Information APPENDIX F Waste and Discharge Information APPENDIX G Air Emissions Information APPENDIX H Oil Spill Information APPENDIX I Environmental Monitoring Information APPENDIX J Lease Stipulation Information APPENDIX K Environmental Mitigation Measures Information APPENDIX L Related Facilities and Operations Information APPENDIX M Support Vessels and Aircraft Information APPENDIX N Onshore Support Facilities Information APPENDIX O Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Information APPENDIX P Environmental Impact Analysis APPENDIX Q Administrative Information Mississippi Canyon Block 629, OCS-G-36134 Supplemental Exploration Plan APPENDIX A PLAN CONTENTS (30 CFR Part 550.211 and 550.241) A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Vortex-Induced Vibration and Its Suppression Devices
    An Overview of Vortex-Induced Vibration and Its Suppression Devices Don Allen VIV Solutions LLC Houston, Texas, USA What is VIV? • VIV is a concern for marine riser systems and offshore structures • Caused when ocean currents flow past a blunt object • Shedding vortices impart forces onto the object • “Lock in” occurs when the frequency of eddy shedding current matches the natural frequency of the tubular • Can cause accelerated fatigue damage subsea tubular Video of Riser Clashing Caused by VIV Advantages of Tail Fairings™ • Capable of reducing VIV by a full order of magnitude, even when fairings are present only near the top of a riser string • Improve riser fatigue life • Reduce risk of experiencing higher harmonics • Limit wellhead fatigue • Reduce top and bottom angles • Lower drag (Cd ~0.6) • Allow for drilling operations to continue in high currents (less rig downtime) • Most common type of suppression device in use today for drilling risers VIV Solutions can assist with analysis efforts related to fairing coverage length, CONFIDENTIAL joint layout, etc. Project Experience Vessel Client Location Atwood Advantage Atwood Oceanics Gulf of Mexico Eirik Raude Ocean Rig South Africa Stena IceMAX Shell French Guiana Deepsea Metro 1 BG Group Tanzania Deepsea Stavanger Ophir Energy Tanzania Ocean Confidence* Diamond Offshore Brazil Ocean Courage Trinidad Ocean Endeavor* Gulf of Mexico Ocean Voyager* Ocean Star* Ocean Valiant* Ocean Whittington Ocean Worker* West Sirius* Seadrill Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Discovery* Devon Energy Gulf of Mexico Discoverer Clear Leader* Transocean Gulf of Mexico Discoverer Inspiration* Chikyu* Cosmos Shoji Japan Cajun Express* Chevron Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Nautilus* Shell Gulf of Mexico CONFIDENTIAL (*) Indicates project performed through Shell Global Solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernic Agent Search Results
    Copernic Agent Search Results Search: Oil Spill Deep Ocean Danger (All the words) Found: 1503 result(s) on _Full.Search Date: 7/17/2010 6:33:28 AM 1. Gulf Oil Spill Environmental Damage Could Get Much Worse Jul 6, 2010 ... McKinney points out that this deep underwater region is largely ... zone in the Gulf and that pose a long-term threat to ocean life. ... Studies of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska show that ... Be aware of toxic chemicals in house http://environment.about.com/b/2010/07/06/gulf-oil-spill-environmental- damage-could-get-much-worse.htm 99% 2. 6 lessons from the BP oil spill 2010/07/12 For years to come, the United States and the oil industry will be absorbing the lessons of the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Regulators will toughen inspections. Oil companies will adopt ... http://www.wfmj.com/Global/story.asp?S=12792031 93% 3. 2 scientists tell presidential oil spill commission fear of dispersants is mostly unfounded 2010/07/13 An update from the second public hearing of the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling Commission. You can watch the hearing live. Eliot Kamenitz, The Times-PicayuneMathy Stanislaus of the Environmental Protection Agency, Charlie Henry of the http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil- spill/index.ssf/2010/07/scientists_tell_presidential_o.html 92% 4. Gulf of Mexico oil 2010/06/28 The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is not yet an environmental catastrophe - but could worsen as the hurricane season gets under way, scientists said today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Redacted Contains Names F
    15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS employees and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.5 and 15.d.6 are identical and have been combined into one document) INFORMATION REDACTED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The information redacted contains names for each employee holding a position identified in Sections 15.d.5 (““CAMS Employees”) and 15.d.6 (““CAP Employees”) of the Consent Decree as of the date of submission, January 2014. 15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (redacted) 15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS employees and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.5 and 15.d.6 are identical and have been combined into one document) Last Name First Name Current Assignment Position Discoverer Enterprise Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Driller GSF Development Driller I Driller Discoverer India Dynamic Pos Oper II Deepwater Pathfinder Subsea Spvr GSF Development Driller I Dynamic Pos Oper II Discoverer Clear Leader Dynamic Pos Oper III GSF Development Driller II Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer Spirit Subsea Spvr Discoverer Spirit Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Sr Subsea Spvr (MUX) NAM Development Driller III Driller Discoverer Inspiration Driller Discoverer Inspiration Dynamic Pos Oper II Discoverer India Dynamic Pos Oper II GSF C. R. Luigs Driller Development Driller III Sr Subsea Spvr (MUX) NAM Deepwater Pathfinder Subsea Spvr INFORMATION Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Well Containment Company
    Marine Well Containment Company Dan Smallwood, Chief Operations Officer February 2, 2012 Agenda Company Overview Interim Containment System Expanded Containment System Deployment Example 2012 Priorities 2 MWCC – Confidential Agenda Company Overview Interim Containment System Expanded Containment System Deployment Example 2012 Priorities 3 MWCC – Confidential Our Commitment Continuously ready to respond to a well control incident in the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico Continuously advancing deepwater well containment in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Recognized and respected leader in deepwater well containment in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico 4 MWCC – Confidential About Our Company Leading deepwater well containment system and technology provider for U.S. Gulf of Mexico Expertise in subsea containment and incident response training Independent, not‐for‐profit company 10 members, representing 70% of the deepwater wells drilled from 2007‐2009 Each member has an equal share and an equal vote Investment of over $1 billion in system System available to all operators in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as a member or as a non‐member (per well basis) 5 MWCC – Confidential Agenda Company Overview Interim Containment System Expanded Containment System Deployment Example 2012 Priorities 6 MWCC – Confidential MWCC Containment System Roles MWCC Covered Entity (Responsible Party - RP) Maintain containment system in ready Direct and manage containment state response (with Unified Command) Deliver capping stack and subsea Remove debris components
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Redacted Contains Names F
    15.d.1(CD) List of Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.1 and 15.d.3 Are identical and have been combined into one document) INFORMATION REDACTED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The information redacted contains names for each employee holding a position identified in Sections 15.d.1 (“Well Control Personnel”) and 15.d.3 (“Designated Employees”) of the Consent Decree as of the date of submission, January 2014. VERSION REDACTED 15.d.1(CD) Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (redacted) 15.d.1(CD) List of Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.1 and 15.d.3 are identical and have been combined into one document) Last Name First Name Current Assignment Position Discoverer Deep Seas Toolpusher Discoverer Enterprise Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Driller GSF Development Driller I Driller Deepwater Champion Toolpusher Discoverer Spirit Toolpusher Development Driller III Sr Toolpusher Deepwater Pathfinder Toolpusher Deepwater Pathfinder Toolpusher GSF Development Driller II Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer Spirit Driller Development Driller III Driller Discoverer Inspiration Toolpusher Discoverer Inspiration Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Sr Toolpusher GSF C. R. Luigs Driller Deepwater Nautilus Toolpusher Discoverer Enterprise OIM Offshore Inst Mgr Discoverer Clear Leader VERSIONDriller INFORMATION GSF C. R. Luigs
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Yuen , Et Al. V. Transocean Ltd., Et Al. 10-CV-01467
    Case 2:10-cv-01467-JCZ-SS Document 1 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THOMAS YUEN and SUMNI AHN, ) Civil Action No. Individually and on Behalf of All Others ) Similarly Situated, ) COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) TRANSOCEAN LTD. and STEVEN L. ) NEWMAN, ) Defendants. ) ) )DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Case 2:10-cv-01467-JCZ-SS Document 1 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 22 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1. This is a securities fraud class action on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Transocean Ltd. (“Transocean” or the “Company”) between August 5, 2009 and May 7, 2010, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This action is brought against Transocean and one of its senior officers and/or directors for violations of § § 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder in connection with the dissemination of false and misleading statements about the Company’s deficient safety protocols, recurring blowout preventer (“BOP”) problems, and its operating and safety record. 2. Transocean is an owner and/or operator of approximately 140 mobile offshore drilling units. During the Class Period, defendants falsely represented that Transocean had remedied its past safety problems and was closely monitoring the Company’s operating and equipment, while omitting to disclose material information concerning Transocean’s repeated safety failures and recurring BOP issues. Defendants falsely represented that the Company’s BOP problems “have all been resolved,” and that BOP issues were “anomalies,” concealing that the Company had not eliminated BOP issues nor rectified the prior BOP failures.
    [Show full text]
  • DRILLING TECHNOLOGY a New Rotary Steerable System, with Through-Motor Telemetry, Delivers Superior Performance
    APRIL 2015 / DEFINING CONVENTIONAL, SHALE AND OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY FOR OIL AND GAS / WorldOil.com DRILLING TECHNOLOGY A new rotary steerable system, with through-motor telemetry, delivers superior performance OFFSHORE E&C An integrated drillship design, with dual multi-purpose tower, cuts drilling costs more than 20%. OTC 2015 Offshore Technology Conference preview and Spotlight on Technology winners REGIONAL REPORT: GULF OF MEXICO Even as oil teeters around $50/bbl, Gulf of Mexico is on brink of a production boom ® Originally appeared in World Oil APRIL 2015 issue, pgs 98-107. Posted with permission. REGIONAL REPORT GULF OF MEXICO Future deepwater GOM projects are less vulnerable to low oil prices. Even as the price of oil teeters around $50, the Gulf of Mexico is poised on the brink of a production boom. Repercussions of the price collapse in this o shore market depend less on how low prices go, than how long they stay there. MIKE SLATON, Contributing Editor Much of the current crude oil pricing storm ends at the dom says that the long-term outlook for deepwater projects is a water’s edgeat least in the short term. The Gulf of Mexico bulwark against immediate catastrophe. However, while short- (GOM) market is relatively sheltered from price volatility in term crude price volatility may have minimal impact on big off- fundamental ways, from the reservoirs to project size, and op- shore projects, there is no immunity from this marketplace. erator staying power. But with a drop from $107.95/bbl on June 20, 2014, to an MARKET PERSPECTIVES early-March 2015 price of $49.59, everybody’s boat is taking on While U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    No. 10-30585 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit HORNBECK OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, and MICHAEL R. BROMWICH, in his official capacity as Director of that Bureau, Defendants-Appellants. __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-CV-1663(F)(2) (Hon. Martin Feldman) __________________________________________________________________ AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF SEN. MARY LANDRIEU OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUISIANA OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION, GREATER HOUSTON PARTNERSHIP, IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ MOTION FOR STAY R. Ted Cruz Brady Edwards Allyson N. Ho MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 Houston, Texas 77002 713.890.5000 Telephone 713.890.5001 Facsimile Attorneys for Amici Curiae (list of amici continues on inside cover) No. 10-30585 (list of amici, continued from front cover) Louisiana Association of Business & Industry, Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce, Greater Shreveport Chamber of Commerce, Ruston Lincoln (LA) Chamber of Commerce, Natchitoches Area (LA) Chamber of Commerce, Baton Rouge Area Chamber of Commerce, Southern Crop Production Association, New Orleans Chamber of Commerce, Mississippi
    [Show full text]
  • Dsme Offshore Products &
    PUBLISHED IN FEBRUARY 2015 World leader World leader in ocean Technology in ocean Technology DSME OFFSHORE PRODUCTS & PLANTS DSME OFFSHORE PRODUCTS & PLANTS www.dsme.co.kr WORLD LEADER 02_03 PROLOGUE PRODUCTS APPENDIX IN OCEAN TECHNOLOGY DSME OFFSHORE PRODUCTS & PLANTS PROLOGUE HISTORY EPCIC CONTRACTOR HSE / QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS PORTFOLIO WORLD LEADER 04_05 PROLOGUE PRODUCTS APPENDIX IN OCEAN TECHNOLOGY HISTORY 1973 - Groundbreaking for Okpo Shipyard 2000 - DHI’s Shipbuilding Division became independent 2008 - Received Korea IT Innovation Award and acquired ISO - CLOV FPSO : Received 2013 Contractor Safety award 1978 - Established Daewoo Shipbuilding & Heavy Machinery company 27001 Certification from TOTAL / Achieved 15.6 million man-hours Co., Ltd. (DSHM) 2001 - Awarded most LNGC orders in the world and acquired - Achieved safety result of 10 million man-hours with IIF without LTIs 1981 - Held topping out ceremony for completion of Okpo OHSAS 18001 Certification for first time in Korean in Qatar LNGC project - Awarded largest number of drillship newbuilding Shipyard shipbuilding industry 2009 - Received USD 10 billion Export Tower Award and contracts (7 drillships) 1982 - Delivered first chemical carrier, ‘Bow Pioneer’ 2002 - Changed official corporate title to DSME and adopted world’s largest floating dock debuted at DSME - Awarded contract for high-spec Jack-Up Rig from 1983 - Delivered Korea’s first Drilling Rig, ‘Doo Sung’ corporate core values, ‘Trust’ and ‘Passion’ shipyard Maersk Drilling 1994 - Merged with Daewoo Heavy
    [Show full text]