DOCSLIB.ORG

Correlates of Texas Standard Ap Charter Campuses and How They

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Correlates of Texas Standard Ap Charter Campuses and How They CORRELATES OF TEXAS STANDARD AP CHARTER CAMPUSES AND HOW THEY COMPARE WITH STANDARD AP TRADITIONAL PUBLIC CAMPUSES Jason Diego Gomez, B.S., M.S. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2009 APPROVED: Richard Fossey, Major Professor James D. Laney, Co-Major Professor John C. Brooks, Committee Member Carol D. Wickstrom, Interim Chair of the Department of Teacher Education and Administration Jerry R. Thomas, Dean of the College of Education Michael Monticino, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Gomez, Jason Diego. Correlates of Texas Standard AP Charter Campuses and How They Compare with Standard AP Traditional Public Campuses. Doctor of Education (Educational Administration), August 2009, 133 pp., 18 tables, 13 figures, references, 60 titles. The research sought to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of Texas standard AP open- enrollment charter school campuses and to discover independent variables that may be utilized to predict effective charter school campuses. The data items used in the analyses were downloaded from the 2007-2008 Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS), which contains a variety of data from all Texas public schools. Multiple statistical analyses were utilized including chi- square, ANOVA, multiple regression and discriminate analysis. In order to evaluate Texas standard AP open enrollment charter campuses, their accountability ratings were compared with those of standard AP traditional public school campuses. The research evaluated twelve independent variables for charter schools to determine their relationship to accountability ratings, thereby providing charter operators indicators or predictors of accountability ratings to facilitate better academic quality. By analyzing the same variables for traditional public schools as charter schools, a baseline model was developed to compare the similarities and differences with the results of the charter school analyses. Copyright 2009 by Jason Diego Gomez ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I want to say thank you to my wife Kelly and my children Abigail, Jason and Isabel for sacrificing time with their dad while I completed my doctoral coursework and dissertation. Second, I have a debt of gratitude to Marilyn Muscanere for her multiple edits, attention to detail and encouragement to finish, as well as to all my family and friends for their encouragement and prayers, including Jim Anglea and Susanne Garner. Next, I am extremely grateful to Dr. Richard Fossey, Dr. Jim Laney and Dr. John Brooks for their sagacious advice, insights and direction on this research. Finally, I am exceedingly grateful to God for the direction to start the doctoral program and the strength to complete it. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 School Choice ......................................................................................................................... 2 Politics ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Growth .................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose and Rationale ................................................................................................................ 6 Problem Statement ...................................................................................................................... 7 Research Questions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Overview of Methodology .......................................................................................................... 9 Limitations and Assumptions ................................................................................................... 10 Definition of Terms .................................................................................................................. 11 Organization of the Study ......................................................................................................... 13 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ...................................................................................................14 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 14 History of Charter Schools ....................................................................................................... 14 Ray Budde ............................................................................................................................. 14 Albert Shanker ...................................................................................................................... 16 The Beginning ....................................................................................................................... 18 What is a Charter School? ........................................................................................................ 19 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 19 Founders or Sponsors ............................................................................................................ 21 Types of Texas Charter Schools ........................................................................................... 21 Home Rule School District Charter .................................................................................. 21 Campus Charter ................................................................................................................ 22 Open-enrollment Charter .................................................................................................. 22 iv University Charter ............................................................................................................. 22 Funding ................................................................................................................................. 23 Who Can Attend? .................................................................................................................. 24 Laws ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Pros and Cons of Charter Schools ............................................................................................ 26 National Charter Schools .......................................................................................................... 29 Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 29 Teachers ................................................................................................................................ 32 NAEP 2003 Pilot Study ........................................................................................................ 34 4th Grade Reading Results ................................................................................................. 35 4th Grade Math Results ..................................................................................................... 36 Hierarchical Linear Modeling ........................................................................................... 37 Summary ............................................................................................................................... 38 Texas Charter Schools .............................................................................................................. 38 Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 42 Enrollment ............................................................................................................................. 43 Staff ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Principal and Parent Survey .................................................................................................. 46 Academics ............................................................................................................................. 48 Summary ............................................................................................................................... 51 3. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................53 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 53 Research Questions and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clifton Higher Education Finance Corporation
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED AUGUST 25, 2016 NEW ISSUE — BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: SEE “RATINGS” HEREIN The delivery of the Bonds (as defined below) is subject to the opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, assuming compliance with certain covenants and based on certain representations, interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under existing law and is not includable in the alternative minimum taxable income of individuals. See “TAX MATTERS” herein for a discussion of the opinion of Bond Counsel, including the alternative minimum tax consequences for corporations. CLIFTON HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE CORPORATION $18,170,000* EDUCATION REVENUE BONDS (IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS) SERIES 2016B Dated: October 1, 2016 – Interest accrues from date of delivery Due: as shown on inside cover The Clifton Higher Education Finance Corporation (the “Issuer”), a non-profit corporation created and existing under Chapter 53 and 53A of the Texas Education Code, as amended from time to time (the “Act”), is issuing its $18,170,000* Education Revenue Bonds (IDEA Public Schools) Series 2016B (the “Bonds”). The Bonds will be dated October 1, 2016, will be in authorized denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof, and will mature on August 15 of the years as shown on the inside cover page. The Bonds will accrue interest from their date of delivery payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing February 15, 2017, until maturity or earlier redemption. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to a Trust Indenture and Security Agreement dated as of October 1, 2016 (the “Bond Indenture”) between the Issuer and Regions Bank, as trustee (the “Bond Trustee”).
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Households, Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) 2021-2022
    Letter to Households, Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) 2021-2022 July 1, 2021 Dear IDEA Parent/Guardian: We are pleased to inform you that the Child Nutrition Program at IDEA Public Schools will be implementing the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) under the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs for the 2021-2022 school year. In CEP schools, applications are no longer required. Through the CEP, parents/guardians, who have students at qualifying CEP schools, will not be required to submit a meal application for free, reduced, and full priced meals for the upcoming school year. However, the Student Information System of IDEA Public Schools will obtain income surveys as per state compliance to obtain social economic data for some students not currently directly certified through CEP. Income surveys are only to obtain data and will not affect students from CEP schools to qualify for free breakfast and lunch. Schools that participate in CEP provide healthy breakfasts and lunches each day at no charge for ALL students enrolled in that CEP school during the 2021-2022 school year. The IDEA school sites that qualify for the CEP for the 2021-2022 school year include: Rio Grande Valley San Antonio Austin El Paso Tarrant Houston County IDEA Donna IDEA Carver IDEA Montopolis IDEA Rio Vista IDEA Rise IDEA Hardy IDEA Edinburg IDEA Eastside IDEA Bluff Springs IDEA Edgemere IDEA Achieve IDEA Spears IDEA McAllen IDEA Judson IDEA Rundberg IDEA Mesa Hills IDEA Edgecliff IDEA Mission IDEA Mays IDEA Kyle IDEA Horizon Vista IDEA North
    [Show full text]
  • Join Our Team & Family!
    We’reAmerica’s Fastest Growing, Highest AchievingIDEA Charter School Network Join our Team & Family! We’re IDEA From the first day students set foot on an IDEA Public Schools campus, we begin preparing them for success in college and in life. We achieve our record of 100% college acceptance through a focus on personalized learning, character development and challenging coursework. And we believe that the most effective way to achieve our mission of College For All is by hiring the right people into the right roles at the right time. We’re glad you’re here. PROVING WHAT’S POSSIBLE IDEA employees aren’t just educators; we’re innovators. We are giving 100% every day to create a unique educational landscape that provides college opportunities for children everywhere. When you join our team, you become part of a community of dedicated team members motivated by an environment of high expectations and limitless success. With the help of our exceptional future team members—like yourself—we intend to become an even more highly desirable talent destination. We’re building a nationwide team with a joyful culture of high performance that allows everyone—from educators to students to leaders—to matter and achieve more than they ever thought possible. OUR RESULTS Since our first graduating class in 2007, IDEA students have achieved amazing results, including 100% COLLEGE ACCEPTANCE for fourteen consecutive years. Creating a positive work culture is something we take seriously, and we’re proud of the outstanding ratings IDEA Team & Family members gave us in the 2019 Great Place To Work survey.
    [Show full text]
  • School Name a W BROWN-FELLOWSHIP CHARTER
    Texas Department of Agriculture - Food & Nutrition Division Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Site Eligibility Report - Annual Notification of Schools Program Year: 2013 - 2014 School Name A W BROWN-FELLOWSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL 3-8 A.W. BROWN-FELLOWSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL NORTH Pre-K - 2 ABERNATHY EL ABERNATHY J H ABILENE H S AUSTIN EL BASSETTI EL BONHAM EL BOWIE EL BYRON CRAIG MIDDLE CLACK MIDDLE JACKSON EL JEFFERSON OPPORTUNITY CENTER JOHNSTON EL LEE EL LOCUST PRE-K LONG EL MADISON MIDDLE MANN MIDDLE Myra P. Martinez Elementary ORTIZ EL REAGAN EL SAM HOUSTON TAYLOR EL THOMAS EL WOODSON CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE WOODSON PRE-K ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED LEARNING ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED LEARNING ACADEMY OF DALLAS ACADEMY OF CAREERS AND TECHNOLOGIES CHARTER SCHOOL ACCELERATED INTERDISCIPLINARY ACADEMY ADVANTAGE ACADEMY AGUA DULCE EL AGUA DULCE H S ALBA-GOLDEN EL NANCY SMITH EL A.W. JONES EARLY CHILDHOOD/PRE-K CTR A.W. JONES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALDINE H S ALDINE MIDDLE ALDINE NINTH GRADE ANDERSON FIFTH GR SCH Bejamin O Davis High BENJAMIN DAVIS 9TH GRADE SCHOOL BETHUNE 4TH & 5TH GR SCH BLACK EL CALVERT EL CARAWAY INT CARMICHAEL EL CARROLL EL CARTER CARVER CONT ED CTR CHESTER W NIMITZ H S COMPASS ALTERNATIVE CONLEY EL DE SANTIAGO EC/PRE-K CENTER DOUG BUSSEY ELEMENTARY DREW MIDDLE DUNN EL EARL & HAZEL HARRIS ELEMENTARY ECKERT INT EISENHOWER H S EISENHOWER NINTH GRADE ERMEL EL ESCAMILLA INT EVELYN S THOMPSON EL FRANCIS EL GARCIA-LEZA EC/PRE-K CENTER GRAY EL HAMBRICK MIDDLE HILL INTERMEDIATE HINOJOSA EC/PRE-K CENTER HOFFMAN MIDDLE J RUTH SMITH ACADEMY JEWEL SIMPSON HOUSTON INTERMEDIATE JOHNSON EL KEEBLE EC/PRE-K CENTER KITTY AND RICHARD SPENCE ELIMENTARY KUJAWA EL LANE SCH MACARTHUR 9TH MACARTHUR H S MAGRILL EL MARCELLA INTER MENDEL EL NADINE KUJAWA EARLY CHILDHOOD/PRE-K CTR.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEA-Press-Kit-2019 2020.Pdf
    2019-2020 www.ideapublicschools.org Press Kit Our Story WHO WE ARE IDEA Public Schools believes that each and every child can go to college. Since 2000, IDEA Public Schools has grown from a small school with 150 students to the fastest-growing network of tuition-free, Pre-K-12 public charter schools in the United States. IDEA boasts national rankings on U.S. News & World Report’s annual list and the Jay Matthews Challenge Index High School Rankings formerly known as The Washington Post Rankings. IDEA serves nearly 53,000 college-bound students in 96 schools across six regions and is on-track to maintain its legacy of sending 100% of its graduates to college. We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that thrives on the engagement of our alumni and community members as well as the financial support of individual donors, foundations, and friends of IDEA. OUR MISSION IDEA Public Schools prepares students from underserved communities for success in college and citizenship. OUR VISION To ensure students reach their potential, IDEA Public Schools will become the region’s largest creator of college graduates. ES TABLISHED GRADES STUDENT S COLLEGE-BOUND 2000 PRE-K - 12 53,000 100% IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS | PRESS KIT 2017 | 2 The Road to and Through College COLLEGE FOR ALL CHILDREN From the first day students set foot on an IDEA Public Schools campus - whether Academy or College Prep - we instill in them the expectation that they will go to college. This expectation is woven in the fabric of everything we say and do.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEA Public Schools Narrative
    Table of Contents Introduction and Applicant Background .....................................................................................1 Absolute Priority 2: Low‐income Demographic ..........................................................................2 Competitive Preference Priority 1: IDEA Promotes Diversity ......................................................2 Competitive Preference Priority 2: IDEA will reopen poor‐performing public schools as charter schools ........................................................................................................................................7 (i) IDEA demonstrates past success working with poor‐performing schools ...................................... 7 (ii) IDEA will reopen poor performing public schools as charter schools............................................ 8 Competitive Preference Priority 3—IDEA Serves High School Students ......................................9 (i) IDEA serves educationally disadvantaged high school students .................................................... 9 (ii) IDEA prepares all students for enrollment in postsecondary education ..................................... 10 (iii) IDEA provides support for educationally disadvantaged students to persist in and attain a college degree .................................................................................................................................. 15 (iv) IDEA’s project‐specific performance measures..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 00005 Palestine Isd 0101 Northside
    ESC Pct CEID CEName SiteID SiteName Region FRP 00005 PALESTINE ISD 0101 NORTHSIDE PRI 7 80% 00005 PALESTINE ISD 0102 WASHINGTON EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER 7 100% 00006 WESTWOOD ISD 0101 WESTWOOD EL 7 93% 00006 WESTWOOD ISD 0102 WESTWOOD PRI 7 93% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0003 ALTERNATIVE SCH 7 87% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0120 ANDERSON EL 7 85% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0122 BROOKHOLLOW EL 7 86% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0123 COSTON EL 7 91% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0125 GARRETT PRIMARY 7 95% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0126 HACKNEY PRIMARY 7 94% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0127 HERTY EL 7 89% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0128 KURTH EL 7 81% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0129 SLACK EL 7 84% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0130 TROUT EL 7 90% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0131 ECOMET BURLEY SR PRI 7 82% 00011 LUFKIN ISD 0201 JUVENILE DETENT CTR 7 100% 00013 DIBOLL ISD 0102 DIBOLL PRI 7 100% 00016 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD 0001 ROCKPORT-FULTON H S 2 100% 00016 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD 0041 ROCKPORT-FULTON MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 100% 00016 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD 0101 FULTON EL 2 100% 00016 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD 0102 DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER 2 100% 00016 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD 0103 LIVEOAK EL 2 100% 00023 LYTLE ISD 0103 LYTLE PRIMARY SCHOOL 20 80% 00025 POTEET ISD 0101 POTEET ELEMENTARY 20 86% 00025 POTEET ISD 0102 POTEET INTERMEDIATE 20 82% 00028 BRAZOS ISD 0103 PRAIRIE HARBOR ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 6 100% 00029 MULESHOE ISD 0001 MULESHOE H S 17 83% 00029 MULESHOE ISD 0002 PEP CAMPUS 17 100% 00029 MULESHOE ISD 0041 WATSON J H 17 87% 00029 MULESHOE ISD 0101 MARY DESHAZO EL 17 88% 00029 MULESHOE ISD 0103 DILLMAN EL 17 89% 00032 BASTROP ISD 0022 GENESIS H S 13 86% 00032 BASTROP ISD 0101 EMILE ELEMENTARY 13 94% 00032 BASTROP ISD 0103 CEDAR CREEK ELEMENTARY 13 94% 00032 BASTROP ISD 0107 RED ROCK ELEMENTARY 13 94% 00032 BASTROP ISD 0109 BLUEBONNET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 13 94% 00032 BASTROP ISD 0110 LOST PINES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 13 94% 00033 ELGIN ISD 0101 BOOKER T.
    [Show full text]
  • Achievement Report
    Achievement Report { 2016 } Since 2007, NMSI has supported 1.5 million students at more than 1,000 high schools and 45 universities from coast to coast with effective programs that are created for teachers, by teachers. By working to ensure all students thrive in advanced coursework, we’re proud to help prepare them for college and career. We believe that with great schools and great teachers, every student can thrive. Reducing equity gaps in our country begins with ensuring every student has access to a high-quality education and graduates ready for college and career. That is why the National Math and Science Initiative (NMSI) is dedicated to improving student achievement with proven, effective programs that can be replicated and scaled nationwide. Since our founding, we’ve partnered with schools in 530 districts to support more than 1.5 million students from coast to coast. This year, NMSI has seen unprecedented growth. Our results have been recognized nationally, inspiring further expansion of NMSI’s three core programs: the College Readiness Program, Laying the Foundation Teacher Training Program and UTeach Expansion Program. Building upon successes in 2015-16, the 2016-17 school year promises to be our most exciting and productive year to date. Thanks to a $20 million Scale-Up grant from the U.S. Department of Education’s Investing in Innovation program, NMSI’s College Readiness Program – which dramatically increases the number of students taking and earning qualifying scores on Advanced Placement® (AP®) math, science and English exams – will reach 60,000 additional students at 42 schools serving a high proportion of traditionally underrepresented students.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Texas High School Rankings
    2019 Texas High School Rankings STATE RANK CAMPUS DISTRICT COUNTY C@R GRADE 1 IRMA LERMA RANGEL YOUNG WOMEN'S LE DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 2 SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 3 DEBAKEY H S FOR HEALTH PROF HOUSTON ISD HARRIS A+ 4 SCHOOL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 5 TRINIDAD GARZA EARLY COLLEGE AT MT DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 6 YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY SAN ANTONIO ISD BEXAR A+ 7 KERR H S ALIEF ISD HARRIS A+ 8 EASTWOOD ACADEMY HOUSTON ISD HARRIS A+ 9 JUDSON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY JUDSON ISD BEXAR A+ 10 JUDGE BAREFOOT SANDERS LAW MAGNET DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 11 EARLY COLLEGE H S LAREDO ISD WEBB A+ 12 CARNEGIE VANGUARD H S HOUSTON ISD HARRIS A+ 13 DR WRIGHT L LASSITER JR EARLY COLL DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 14 HEALTH CAREERS H S NORTHSIDE ISD BEXAR A+ 15 ACHIEVE EARLY COLLEGE H S MCALLEN ISD HIDALGO A+ 16 ALIEF EARLY COLLEGE H S ALIEF ISD HARRIS A+ 17 YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FORT WORTH ISD TARRANT A+ 18 GRAND PRAIRIE FINE ARTS ACADEMY GRAND PRAIRIE ISD DALLAS A+ 19 SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 20 TRANSMOUNTAIN EARLY COLLEGE H S EL PASO ISD EL PASO A+ 2019 Texas High School Rankings STATE RANK CAMPUS DISTRICT COUNTY C@R GRADE 21 EAST EARLY COLLEGE H S HOUSTON ISD HARRIS A+ 22 ROSIE SORRELLS EDUCATION AND SOCIA DALLAS ISD DALLAS A+ 23 LASA H S AUSTIN ISD TRAVIS A+ 24 SILVA HEALTH MAGNET EL PASO ISD EL PASO A+ 25 TEXAS ACADEMY OF BIOMEDICAL FORT WORTH ISD TARRANT A+ 26 TALKINGTON SCHOOL FOR YOUNG WOMEN LUBBOCK ISD LUBBOCK A+ 27 JIMMY CARTER EARLY COLLEGE H S LA JOYA ISD HIDALGO A+
    [Show full text]
  • Ratings by Charter
    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1 PERFORMANCE REPORTING DIVISION FINAL 2018 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS CHARTERS BY DISTRICT AND CAMPUS District/ 2018 Domains* Distinctions Campus Accountability Student School Closing Read/ Social Academic Post Num Met of District/Campus Name Number Rating Note Achievement Progress the Gaps ELA Math Science Studies Growth Gap Secondary Num Eval A W BROWN LEADERSHIP ACADE 057816 C F B F 0 of 0 AW BROWN-F L A INT CAMPUS 101 Met Standard I M M ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ○ ○ 1 of 7 A W BROWN - F L A EARLY CH 102 Met Standard I M M ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 0 of 6 A+ ACADEMY 057829 C C C C 0 of 0 A+ ACADEMY EL 001 Improvement Required I I I ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 0 of 6 A+ SECONDARY SCHOOL 002 Met Standard M M M ● ● ○ ○ ● ○ ○ 3 of 7 A+ UNLIMITED POTENTIAL 101871 F F F F 0 of 0 A+ UNLIMITED POTENTIAL 041 Improvement Required I I ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 0 of 6 A+UP UNIVERSITY 102 Improvement Required I I I ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 0 of 7 ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC EXCEL 057814 Not Rated 0 of 0 DALLAS COUNTY JUVENILE JUS 001 Not Rated 0 of 0 DRC CAMPUS 002 Not Rated 0 of 0 MEDLOCK YOUTH VILLAGE 003 Not Rated 0 of 0 SAU CAMPUS 004 Not Rated 0 of 0 LETOT CAMPUS 005 Not Rated 0 of 0 ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED LEA 101810 Met Standard M M M 0 of 0 ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED LEA 002 Met Standard M M M ○ ● ○ ○ ○ ○ 1 of 6 ACADEMY OF DALLAS 057810 Met Standard I M M 0 of 0 ACADEMY OF DALLAS 101 Met Standard I M M ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 0 of 7 ACCELERATED INTERMEDIATE A 101849 A B A A 0 of 0 ACCELERATED INTERDISCIPLIN 101 Met Standard M M M ● ○ ○ ○ ● ● 3 of 6 AIA LANCASTER EL 105 Not Rated 0 of 0 ADVANTAGE ACADEMY 057806
    [Show full text]
  • Christ College Alumni Compendium
    CHRIST COLLEGE LIVES: FAITH AND WORK, LOVE AND LIFE FREDRICK BARTON ‘70, EDITOR CHAIR, CHRIST COLLEGE NATIONAL COUNCIL Christ College Lives: Faith and Work, Love and Life Introductory Remarks: CC Homecoming Celebration Saturday, September 30, 2017, 5:30 pm Fredrick Barton ‘70 I find it fitting to be stepping in front of this audience after being introduced by Dean Margaret Franson. It was she, after all, who assigned me the task of standing here at this moment. And that is fitting, too, because, as everyone who graduated from Christ College since 1991 knows first hand, Dean Franson is the engine that pulls the C.C. train. Our esteemed deans may have provided the broad vision, but Margaret Franson supervised the details. And this Golden Anniversary celebration of our founding, like so much about Christ College, has been a Margaret Franson project. I stand here now as one of her details. I frankly don’t recall whose idea it was as part of our anniversary celebration to solicit short biographies from our alumni. But once the idea was agreed to, Margaret volunteered me to edit the submissions into a compendium, which I hope you have had the chance to peruse or will take the chance to read through once the final edition is available. My own reading of these biographies has proven an exquisite pleasure. We C.C. alums have been up to some stuff the last half century, and our compendium is a forthright indication of outstanding individual achievement indicative of amazing programmatic success. I am incredibly pleased to have my own biography nestled among all of these others.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Examination Results in Texas 2009-10
    Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Examination Results in Texas 2009-10 Division of Accountability Research Department of Assessment, Accountability, and Data Quality Texas Education Agency June 2011 Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Examination Results in Texas 2009-10 Project Staff Amanda Callinan Shawn P. Thomas Tunu Loponi Editorial Staff Anthony Grasso Richard Kallus Christine Whalen Division of Accountability Research Department of Assessment, Accountability, and Data Quality Texas Education Agency June 2011 Texas Education Agency Robert Scott, Commissioner of Education Lizzette Reynolds, Deputy Commissioner for Statewide Policy and Programs Department of Assessment, Accountability, and Data Quality Criss Cloudt, Associate Commissioner Office of Data Development, Analysis, and Research Patricia Sullivan, Deputy Associate Commissioner Division of Accountability Research Linda Roska, Director Additional Acknowledgments Special thanks to Rosemary Reshetar, Andrew Wiley, and Kay Wilson with the College Board for reviewing this report. Citation. Texas Education Agency. (2011). Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate examination results in Texas, 2009-10 (Document No. GE11 601 07). Austin, TX: Author. Abstract. This report reviews Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) examination participation and performance in Texas during the 2009-10 school year. Campus-, district-, and state-level examination results for students in Texas public schools are presented, as well as state-level examination results for students in Texas public and nonpublic schools combined. The report discusses the use of AP and IB examination results in college admissions and the Academic Excellence Indicator System. It also provides descriptions and brief histories of the AP and IB programs, along with a brief history of state policy and funding related to the AP and IB programs in Texas.
    [Show full text]