Jodha: a Reality Or a Fable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jodha: a Reality Or a Fable The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention Volume1 issue 8 2014 page no.674-678 ISSN: 2349-2031 Available Online At: http://valleyinternational.net/index.php/our-jou/theijsshi Jodha: A Reality Or A Fable Dr.Satendra Kumar Mishra1, Ms.Shambhavi Tiwari2 1Assistant Professor Amity University, Lucknow & 2Research Scholar Amity University, Lucknow It was researched by many historians that the She gave birth to a son by the blessings of sufi imaginary name Jodha first appeared in the late saint Shaikh Salim Chisti. He was named Salim 19th century when Colonel Tod mentioned after him. The reality is still obscure. Jahangir in Jodhabai in his book named ‘Annals and his memoirs, The Tuzuknama or Jahangirnama, Antiquity of Rajasthan’. Colonel Tod was inspired never mentioned the name of his mother. by the folk literature of Rajputs. According to the Although he mentions the names of many of his director of Oriental Public Library in Patna, Mr. father’s wives. Imtiaz Ahmad records that "Akbarnama mentions Akbar marrying a princess of Amer but clearly her We find only one reference to her mother in his name is nowhere Jodhaa". She is named as Jahangirnama: ‘Mariam Uzamani’ which is not a name but a title. “When my mother came to the time of delivery, Further it is mentioned that Mariam Uzamani is a he (Akbar) sent her to Shaikh’s house and I might title given to the mother of Prince Salim. Jodha be born there.” has not been mentioned anywhere. It is also said that Jodha Bai was actually sister of As stated by some Rajput historians, Akbar was Raja Man Singh, but this too is in contradiction of married to Harkhabai alias Heer Kunwari, the Jahangirnama in which Jahangir speaks after elder daughter of the Bharmal, the maharaja of ascending the- Amer, in Fatehabad i.e. Fatehpur Sikri on 6 Feburary, 1562. Prince Salim was her son. As “Raja Man Singh was one of the trusted stated in the Rajputana records, Princess Jodhabai mansabdars of my father had obtained alliances was the daughter of Rana Udai Singh and in that with his illustrious family as much as his aunt had case she was only three years younger than Prince been introduced in the house of my father ( was Salim and so no way can she be his mother. his wife), and I then married his sister, and Professor Satish Chandra in the history book of Khusrau was also married to his sister Sultana-n- class eleven on medieval India of NCERT claims nisa Begam, the latter of which is my elder child. that Jodha was by no means Akbar's wife but in They were born of her before, ruler of the Bengal fact she was married to Salim, Akbar's son. As per province.” He clearly refers to Man Singh’s aunt the folk lures and legend, Akbar was married to as not as his mother but his father’s wife. Raja Bhagwan Das’s Sister and was Jodha Bai. 674 Cite as : Jodha: A Reality Or A Fable; Vol.1|Issue 08|Pg:674-678 2014 Alex-Rutherford, in the book ‘Ruler of the World’ mention his mother anywhere by name. If and in the historical fiction ‘Empire of the Jahangir would have been born to a Rajput Moghul,’ refers to Jahangir’s mother as being Hira princess of a great Rajput kingdom then for sure Bai of Amber. Jahangir writes about the birth of he would have mentioned it considering the fact his brothers and sister but refers to their mothers that the Mughals always tried to forge on strategic as concubines. It’s obvious that he felt, their status alliances with the brave Rajputs. was as concubines and title of wives did not merit. 'Ain-e-Akbari' and 'Akbarnama' of Abul Fazal's “Three months after my birth, Shahzada Khanam, also have no reference to any Jodha Bai. There is my sister, was born of a royal concubine. She was not a single mention of Jodha Bai in Abdul Kadir handed over to Maryam Makani, Akbar’s mother. Badauni's 'Muntakhib-al-Tawarikh'. There is After her then a son was again born to one of the mentioned Jodha Bai in the historical works of royal concubines, and was named Shah Murad. A.L. Shrivastav, K.L. Khurana and Munni Lal and On the night of Jumada-i-awwal 10th, A.H. 979 few other historians. In the book 'Kachchawon ka (September, 1572), one more child was born to Itihas', Jodha is mentioned as Harkha Bai. In other the royal concubine. As his birth took place at Rajputana history chronicles she is named Ajmer in the blessed shrine of the sufi saint Manmati and Shahi Bai. Khwaja Muinu-d-din Chishti. That child was named Shaikh Daaniyal.” In many of the Rajputana records the Rajputs have clearly objected to the matrimonial alliance of In the case of the two daughters of Akbar, Jodha Bai with Akbar. The sub altern historians Jahangir names the wife as Bibi Daulat Shad and have also written that Jodhabai was in fact one of she was of noble lineage. the wives of Jahangir and not of Akbar. It is just a myth of Jodha Bai being wife of Emperor Akbar “After birth of Daniyal, Bibi Daulat-Shad gave and was spread by the local Muslims, especially, birth to a girl whom they named Shakaru-n-nisa those guides who tell stories to the foreign visitors Begam.” to Fatepur Sikri. Inside of the magnificent halls of “After some time passed one more girl was born Fatehpur Sikri, there are many structures which to Bibi Daulat-Shad, and he i.e.Akbar called her resemble Hindu Temples and their pillars adorned Aram Banu Begam.” with pictures of Hindu God and Goddesses. The Muslim guides tell that one Jodha Bai was the The historian of Aligarh Muslim University wife of Akbar and he allowed her to continue her (AMU), Prof Shirin Moosvi, writes that neither own practice of Hinduism. The presence of there is any mention of Jodhabai in the buildings like Jodha Bai Ka Rauza in the campus ‘Akbarnama’, nor in any of the Mughal of Fatehpur Sikri signifies the importance of documents of that period. Prof Shirin says Jodha Bai in Akbar’s life. This is still an issue of that“Akbar did marry a princess of the the debate in the historians. Many Rajput Kachhawa Rajput, Bhar Mal’s daughter, but she organisations have taken stand against the then was also not Jodhabai”. Prof Moosvi concludes royal families of Jaipur and also Kishangarh on that the name Jodha Bai first appeared in the mid exactly which of their princess married to the of 18th and 19th centuries in folk lures and Mughal and also which Mughal emperor. gradually got place in historical writings. It is really surprising that why did Jahangir not Original manuscripts like Ain - i Akbari and 675 Cite as : Jodha: A Reality Or A Fable; Vol.1|Issue 08|Pg:674-678 2014 Rajput history of the Amber kings actually isn't mentioned anywhere. And she was certainly confirm that Akbar married Raja Bharmal's not Jahangir's mother. Even Jahangir in his daughter in 1562 at Sambhar which is 100 kms memoirs (Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri) doesn't mention from modern Jaipur but the name of the anything about his mother's side." He also said ‘daughter’ was not mentioned. In an interview that in any record there is no mention of Akbar's with BBC, Maharaja Brajraj Singh of Kishangarh wife from Rajputana anywhere in any of the once said, “In our recorded genealogy, the Mughal text. Be it Abul Fazal, in his 'Akbarnama' documents of the royal family are still the most or Jahangir, in his autobiography, 'Tuzk-e- authentic and trusted records, and in our records Jahangiri', no one mentioned Jodha Bai as his wife no Jodhabai exists. Jodha was actually Hira of Akbar. Irfan Habib says that the myth of Jodha Kunwari or Harkha Bai. I still don’t know why Bai of being Akbar's wife most probably got some historians call her Jodha.” The myth got credence in the first half of 19th century when the popular belief when historians like Col Todd historical tour guides at Fatehpur Sikri presented called Akbar's wife as Jodha and this was her Akbar's wife and unfortunately this perception projected in the films like K.Asif's classic is prevalent today also. ‘Mughal-e-azam’ and Gowarikar’s ‘Jodha-Akbar’ followed by many TV serials. The Rajput N.R.Farooqi says that Jodha Bai was in fact not community says that now it’s time to set the Akbar's wife but actually the name of Jahangir's record correct. They claim by their authenticated wife. The original name of Jodha bai was Jagat records that Jodha was no doubt from Jodhpur but Gosain. As she was from the royal family of she was married to Jahangir and not to Jodhpur so she was commonly referred as Jodha Akbar. Prof Khangarot, a renowned historian and Bai. Farooqi writes that she received important also the spokesperson for the Rajputana Sabha place amoung the woman in the royal heram. said, ''No one has got the right to manipulate with Jodha bai was the mother of Khurram, Shah history in the name of creativity or change it. Jahan. Jodha Bai was actually the daughter of Maharaja The historians have reservations over ‘name’ of of Jodhpur who was married to Salim and she was the Rajput princess but not the ‘person’.
Recommended publications
  • Mughal Paintings of Hunt with Their Aristocracy
    Arts and Humanities Open Access Journal Research Article Open Access Mughal paintings of hunt with their aristocracy Abstract Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2019 Mughal emperor from Babur to Dara Shikoh there was a long period of animal hunting. Ashraful Kabir The founder of Mughal dynasty emperor Babur (1526-1530) killed one-horned Department of Biology, Saidpur Cantonment Public College, rhinoceros and wild ass. Then Akbar (1556-1605) in his period, he hunted wild ass Nilphamari, Bangladesh and tiger. He trained not less than 1000 Cheetah for other animal hunting especially bovid animals. Emperor Jahangir (1606-1627) killed total 17167 animals in his period. Correspondence: Ashraful Kabir, Department of Biology, He killed 1672 Antelope-Deer-Mountain Goats, 889 Bluebulls, 86 Lions, 64 Rhinos, Saidpur Cantonment Public College, Nilphamari, Bangladesh, 10348 Pigeons, 3473 Crows, and 10 Crocodiles. Shahjahan (1627-1658) who lived 74 Email years and Dara Shikoh (1657-1658) only killed Bluebull and Nur Jahan killed a tiger only. After study, the Mughal paintings there were Butterfly, Fish, Bird, and Mammal. Received: December 30, 2018 | Published: February 22, 2019 Out of 34 animal paintings, birds and mammals were each 16. In Mughal pastime there were some renowned artists who involved with these paintings. Abdus Samad, Mir Sayid Ali, Basawan, Lal, Miskin, Kesu Das, Daswanth, Govardhan, Mushfiq, Kamal, Fazl, Dalchand, Hindu community and some Mughal females all were habituated to draw paintings. In observed animals, 12 were found in hunting section (Rhino, Wild Ass, Tiger, Cheetah, Antelope, Spotted Deer, Mountain Goat, Bluebull, Lion, Pigeon, Crow, Crocodile), 35 in paintings (Butterfly, Fish, Falcon, Pigeon, Crane, Peacock, Fowl, Dodo, Duck, Bustard, Turkey, Parrot, Kingfisher, Finch, Oriole, Hornbill, Partridge, Vulture, Elephant, Lion, Cow, Horse, Squirrel, Jackal, Cheetah, Spotted Deer, Zebra, Buffalo, Bengal Tiger, Camel, Goat, Sheep, Antelope, Rabbit, Oryx) and 6 in aristocracy (Elephant, Horse, Cheetah, Falcon, Peacock, Parrot.
    [Show full text]
  • Miskina, Sarwan and Bhura, C1590-95 Akabarnama; Mines Exploding During the Siege of Chitor, (Mughal)
    Miskina, Sarwan and Bhura, c1590-95 Akabarnama; Mines exploding during the siege of Chitor, (Mughal) Key facts: Artists: Composition by Miskina, colours and details painted by Sarwan and Bhura. Date: circa 1590-95 Medium: opaque watercolour and gold on paper Dimensions: 33 x 18.8 cm Source: this belongs to a presentation copy of the Akbarnama, the history of the reign of the Mughal emperor Akbar (1542-1605). The Persian text of this copy has 116 paintings done by Akbar’s artists. Location: Victoria and Albert Museum, London (IS.2:66-1896 and IS.2:67-1896) 1. ART HISTORICAL TERMS AND CONCEPTS Subject matter: The four-month siege to capture the fort of Chitor began in October 1567. It was a key part of Akbar’s campaign against the Hindu ruler of the province of Mewar in Rajasthan, who had refused to make friendly alliances with the emperor through marriage, unlike his Rajput neighbours. The fort was seen as impregnable, and a Mughal victory here would deter future resistance. In this painting, Mughal sappers prepare covered paths and lay mines to protect the advancing army. Akbar directs their work. He is identifiable by the feather in his turban: this is an emblem of royalty, as is the flywhisk held by the attendant behind him. The text explains that the placing of the mines had been done against his advice. These exploded when the invading Mughal army rode over them, and some of Akbar’s best generals were blown up. Composition: The scene is shown in a stylised, not realistic, manner.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Building and the Management of Diversity in India (Thirteenth to Seventeenth Centuries) Corinne Lefèvre
    State-building and the Management of Diversity in India (Thirteenth to Seventeenth Centuries) Corinne Lefèvre To cite this version: Corinne Lefèvre. State-building and the Management of Diversity in India (Thirteenth to Sev- enteenth Centuries). Medieval History Journal, SAGE Publications, 2014, 16 (2), pp.425-447. 10.1177/0971945813514907. halshs-01955988 HAL Id: halshs-01955988 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01955988 Submitted on 7 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Medieval History Journal http://mhj.sagepub.com/ State-building and the Management of Diversity in India (Thirteenth to Seventeenth Centuries) Corinne Lefèvre The Medieval History Journal 2013 16: 425 DOI: 10.1177/0971945813514907 The online version of this article can be found at: http://mhj.sagepub.com/content/16/2/425 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for The Medieval History Journal can be found at: Email Alerts: http://mhj.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://mhj.sagepub.com/subscriptions
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Veil:An Analytical Study of Political Domination of Mughal Women Dr
    11 Behind The Veil:An Analytical study of political Domination of Mughal women Dr. Rukhsana Iftikhar * Abstract In fifteen and sixteen centuries Indian women were usually banished from public or political activity due to the patriarchal structure of Indian society. But it was evident through non government arenas that women managed the state affairs like male sovereigns. This paper explores the construction of bourgeois ideology as an alternate voice with in patriarchy, the inscription of subaltern female body as a metonymic text of conspiracy and treachery. The narratives suggested the complicity between public and private subaltern conduct and inclination – the only difference in the case of harem or Zannaha, being a great degree of oppression and feminine self –censure. The gradual discarding of the veil (in the case of Razia Sultana and Nur Jahan in Middle Ages it was equivalents to a great achievement in harem of Eastern society). Although a little part, a pinch of salt in flour but this political interest of Mughal women indicates the start of destroying the patriarchy imposed distinction of public and private upon which western proto feminism constructed itself. Mughal rule in India had blessed with many brilliant and important aspects that still are shining in the history. They left great personalities that strengthen the history of Hindustan as compare to the histories of other nations. In these great personalities there is a class who indirectly or sometime directly influenced the Mughal politics. This class is related to the Mughal Harem. The ladies of Royalty enjoyed an exalted position in the Mughal court and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • 388 22 - 28 February 2008 16 Pages Rs 30
    #388 22 - 28 February 2008 16 pages Rs 30 Weekly Internet Poll # 388 Q. How would you describe the Madhes general strike? Total votes: 4,735 Dark Ages hronic shortages of electricity, fuel, water and now food have brought about a serious dislocation of Weekly Internet Poll # 389. To vote go to: www.nepalitimes.com C businesses, trade and livelihoods throughout the country. Q. Given the crisis in the Madhes should the elections be: The shortages come at a time of deepening political crisis in the Madhes in the run-up to elections. They feed the public’s perception of government incompetence. What is surprising is that people are still queuing up for fuel, gas and water without complaining. But public patience is running thin, and relatively minor incidents can spiral out of control as seen last week in Bhaktapur. Photo essay: p 8-9. SAM KANG LI 2 EDITORIAL 22 - 28 FEBRUARY 2008 #388 Published by Himalmedia Pvt Ltd, Editor: Kunda Dixit Design: Kiran Maharjan Director Sales and Marketing: Sunaina Shah marketing(at)himalmedia.com Circulation Manager: Samir Maharjan sales(at)himalmedia.com Subscription: subscription(at)himalmedia.com,5542525/535 Hatiban, Godavari Road, Lalitpur editors(at)nepalitimes.com GPO Box 7251, Kathmandu 5250333/845, Fax: 5251013 www.nepalitimes.com Printed at Jagadamba Press, Hatiban: 5250017-19 A War on Tolerance When the people feel abandoned... AMSTERDAM — When ‘tolerance’ He thinks that Europe is in peril hostile to capital cities. Brussels, becomes a term of abuse in a place of being ‘Islamized’. “There will the capital of the European Union, POWER TO THE PEOPLE like the Netherlands, you know soon be more mosques than stands for everything that Not even if someone wanted to deliberately sabotage the country that something has gone seriously churches,” he says, if true populists, whether left or right, would they be as successful as the Seven Minus One party wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Baburnama Bangla Pdf
    Baburnama bangla pdf Continue literally: The Story of Babur or Letters of Babur; as ,' ;ﻧﺎﻣ :Supported by WBEIDC Ltd., supported by SSTIS Technologies Pvt Ltd Memoirs Babur, founder of the Mughal Empire Awards Ceremony at the court of Sultan Ibraham, before being sent on an expedition to Sambhal Beburnama (Chagatai /Persian an alternative known as Tuzk-e-Babri) - a memoir of the Ẓahīr-ud-Dev Muhammad Babur (1483-1530), the empire of the founder of the Great Moguls and great-grandson Timur. It is written in Chagatai language, known to Baburu as Turks (meaning Turkic), the colloquial language of asijan-timurids. During the reign of Emperor Akbar, the work was fully translated into Persian, the usual literary language at the court of the Mughals, the court of the Mughals, Abdul Rahim, in 998 AD (1589-1590). Translations into many other languages followed, mostly from the 19th century. Babur was educated by Prince Timurid, and his observations and comments in his memoirs reflect an interest in nature, society, politics and economics. His vivid account of events covers not only his own life, but also the history and geography of the areas in which he lived, as well as the people with whom he came into contact. The book covers such diverse topics as astronomy, geography, state craft, military issues, weapons and battles, plants and animals, biographies and family chronicles, courtiers and artists, poetry, music and paintings, wine parties, historical monuments tours, and reflections on human nature. Although Babur himself did not appear to have ordered any illustrated versions, his grandson began as soon as he was presented with a finished Persian translation in November 1589.
    [Show full text]
  • Mughal Period: Akbar
    MUGHAL PERIOD: AKBAR (1556 -1605 CE) Mughal Shield This magnificent shield belongs to Emperor Akbar. It bears the inscription ‘Buland Ikbal Shahanshah Akbar Year A.H. 1002’. The decorations on the shield run in three circular bands around the sun in the centre .The outer band around the centre has a bold meandering pattern. The next band has representations of the twelve Zodiac signs. The name of each sign is mentioned in the oval panel next to it. This shield is only one of its kind and displayed in Chhatrapati Shivaji Vastu Sanghralaya, Mumbai. Jalal – ud- din Akbar, also known as Akbar ‘The Great’ was the third Mughal emperor after Babur and Humayun. Akbar was 13 years old when he ascended the throne. At that time Delhi was the capital which he later shifted to Fatehpur Sikri. Akbar proclaimed the throne in the midst of a war against Sikander Shah of the Sur dynasty. Akbar was a commander of the stature who built the largest army in the history of the Mughal Empire. The Mughal army resembled a city on the move. TWO FAMOUS BATTLES FOUGHT BY AKBAR 1. Second Battle of Panipat 2. Battle of Haldighati Battle of Panipat During his early reign Akbar fought the battle of Panipat to reclaim his capital when he had been away to subdue the forces of Sher Shah‟s dynasty who were the biggest threats at that time. Akbar defeated Sikander Shah Suri easily but when he was away, Hemu defeated the Mughal forces in Delhi. Akbar‟s army met Hemu‟s forces in Panipat and hence started the second battle of Panipat between Akbar and Hemu.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiography of Mughal Period-An Analytical Study
    Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Vol-2, Issue-6, 2016 ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in Historiography of Mughal Period-An Analytical Study Dr. Shahina Bano Department Of History, Assistant Professor, Maharni’s Arts College For Women-Bangalore-1 Abstract: In the Mughal period an innovative class Moghul Empire and great grandson of Timur. It is of historiography- that of official histories or an autobiographical work.It was originally written namah- came in to vogue in india under Persian in the Chagatai language, known to baburas influence.Akbar introduced the practice of “Turk”(meaning Turkic), the spoken language of commissioning officials or others to write the the Andijan-Timurids. Babur’s prose is highly history of his new empire giving them access for Persianised in its sentences structure, morphology, this purpose to state records.This practice and language. It is also contains many pharases and continued down to the reign of Aurangzeb who, smaller poems in Persian.During the Emperor’s however, stopped it in his eleventh regnal reign, the work was completely translated to year.Besides,, such official histories, biographical Persian by a Moghul courtier, Abdul Rahim, in works great historical interst were also produced (1589-90) during the period under survey. And we not entirely dependent upon chroniclers; we have in some Baburnamah can be divided into three Parts. The instances contemporary, independent historians. first part begins with his accession to the throne of The historians of the Mughal Period did not Fargana and ends with his driving out from his develop any philosophy of history from which flight to his last invasion of lndia.
    [Show full text]
  • Francesca Galloway
    FRANCESCA GALLOWAY INDIAN PAINTINGS 1450 -1850 Catalogue by JP Losty 11th June - 20th July 2018 It is our great pleasure to introduce this group, rich in the coming year is to be decided by God. It is per- in early Mughal and pre-Mughal paintings, many of haps telling that so much of the energy of the Mughal which come from an important private collection. art of this period (the mid-18th century), when the Among this group are three folios from the first il- empire is beginning to decentralize and to decline lustrated Baburnama (cat. 5 – 7) (also known as the politically and economically, can be seen to go into V&A Baburnama), an extraordinary memoir de- the lavish detailing of courtly celebration. This is tailing the nomadic life of the Central Asian prince reflected here in the sumptuous display of conspicu- Babur, displaced from his home and in search of ous wealth, with intricately illustrated fireworks and a kingdom fit for his Timurid ancestry – an ambi- hanging lakeside lanterns, a gaudy elephant-shaped tion realised at last with his conquest of Delhi and candelabra and attending musicians, in a scene full of founding of the Mughal empire. This particular copy opulent costumes, jewels and sweetmeats. was an important event in itself, commissioned by Babur’s grandson Akbar and translated into Persian There are several fine and characterful Pahari paint- for the first time in the 1580s. In a sense this was a ings. Cat. 20 sees Raja Mahendra Pal of Basohli political act, an illustrated manuscript to enact the setting out for an expedition with his man ladies.
    [Show full text]
  • King of the Birds
    KING OF THE BIRDS Print of a peacock. Catherine Hettler. SPRING 2020 50 KRISTEN HICKEY KING OF THE BIRDS: MAKING SYMBOL, SUBJECT, AND SCIENCE IN THE SKIES OF HINDUSTAN When the Mughals founded an empire in Hindustan, they sought to legitimize their budding dynasty through diverse sources of power. In the texts and art produced by emperors and their courts during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, these performances of power constantly featured birds. Birds, enfleshed and imagined, were used as motifs that positioned the Mughals as the cultural descendants of a long Islamic tradition of storytelling and spirituality. Wild and captive birds became an extension of the imperial court as emperors strove to model the legendary rule of King Solomon, who was renowned for his just power over all creatures. During this age of scientist-kings, avians also became catalysts for experimentation and the production of knowledge. This intricate relationship between birds and power reveals a Mughal conception of empire, defined by fluid boundaries between the human and animal kingdoms. Kristen Hickey Written for Ruling Hindustan (HIST 494) Dr. Lisa Balabanlilar In the Hindustani empire of the Mughals, birds were companions, partners in the hunt, playthings, and sources of great entertainment. They were fascinating airborne creatures, worthy of great scientific attention. The subject of unimaginable hours of artistic labor, they appeared in countless folios, with their feathers adorning the jeweled turbans of only the most powerful emperors.1 The presence of birds illuminated and defined the seat of the Mughal emperor as a ruler in an ancient tradition of powerful kingships.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences and Significance of Second Battle of Panipat
    International Journal of Advanced Research and Development International Journal of Advanced Research and Development ISSN: 2455-4030 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.advancedjournal.com Volume 3; Issue 2; March 2018; Page No. 19-21 Consequences and significance of second battle of Panipat Karmvir Department of History, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India Abstract The Second Battle of Panipat was fought between the forces of Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya, popularly called Hemu, the Hindu king who was ruling North India from Delhi, and the army of Akbar, on November 5, 1556. It was a decisive victory for Akbar's generals Khan Zaman I and Bairam Khan. Background On January 24, 1556, the Mughal ruler Humanyun died in Delhi and was succeeded by his son, Akbarat Kalanaur, who was only thirteen years old. Keywords: Panipat, battle, war, second, causes, results etc. Introduction to free their nation, yet Bairam Khan ruled for war. Akbar's On February 14, 1556, Akbar was enthroned as the king. At armed force walked towards Delhi. On November 5, the two the time of his accession to the throne, the Mughal rule was armed forces met at the memorable combat zone of Panipat, confined to Kabul, Kandahar, parts of Delhi and Punjab. where, thirty years sooner, Akbar's granddad Babur had Akbar was then battling in Kabul with his watchman, Bairam crushed Ibrahim Lodi in what is presently known as the First Khan. Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya or Hemu was a Battle of Panipat. H.G.Keen expresses; "Akbar and his Hindu head in Delhi by ethicalness of vanquishing watchman Bairam Khan did not take an interest in the fight Akbar/Humanyun's armed force in Battle for Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Akbar and His Religious Policy Akbar Is Often Considered As National King
    Akbar and his religious policy Akbar is often considered as national king who united all sections of the people and he is also said to have been secular ruler who kept his personal religious ideas from framing state policies and adopted policy of religious tolerance. There are two questions which primarily arises before the historiens in regard to Akbar’s religious policy: 1. To what extent Akbar’s personal believes had influenced in his state policies? And 2. What was the response of his subjects to his state policies? There are few reasons why Akbar became secular king. 1. He was influenced by teachings of his broad-minded mother, teacher and his relatives. 2. He was influenced by the prominent cultural ethos of timurid polity-YasaE-Chingesi(treating all the religions alike) 3. The increasing presence of Irani nobles at Humayun’s had created an atmosphere for Akbar to learn religious tolerance. 4. His childhood psychology fearing about god shaped his religious outlook. For instance, abul- fazl states, as akbar says” if he had displeased God in any manner, 'may that elephant finish us for we cannot support the burden of life under God's displeasure.'” 5. His personal engagement in Islamized version of greek philosophy through Shaikh Mubaraq and his sons faizi and abul-fazl shaped his religious world outlook through Ibadatkana debates from 1575- 1578. Akbar was, in his early part of reign, following intolerant policies towards non-muslims as the following statements testify: One knows from unimpeachable evidence, including some of Akbar's own sayings recorded after 1581 that in his early years he was not only a practising Muslim but also had a very intolerant attitude htowards Hindus.
    [Show full text]