Energy Arbitration in Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2018 Published by Global Arbitration Review in association with Ashurst Dubai International Arbitration Centre Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Cairo Regional Centre for International FTI Consulting Commercial Arbitration Lazareff Le Bars Cos¸ar Avukatlık Bürosu Matouk Bassiouny DIFC Arbitration Institute Udo Udoma & Belo-Osagie DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP DLA Piper www.globalarbitrationreview.com arg © Law Business Research Energy Arbitration in Africa Steven P Finizio Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP The energy sector is a critical element in Africa’s economic devel- in arbitration is growing across the continent; many jurisdictions opment. It includes traditional resources such as oil, gas and coal have taken the key steps of ratifying the New York Convention as well as a growing emphasis on renewable sources of energy.1 and adopting modern arbitration legislation, and several are devel- Historically and today, the African energy sector has been domi- oping arbitral institutions.10 Disputes involving large-scale energy nated by the petroleum industry. Africa has a number of the projects in Africa have typically been resolved through interna- world’s top oil-producing countries, with an estimated 57 per cent tional commercial and investor-state arbitration. This article pro- of Africa’s export earnings derived from hydrocarbon revenues.2 vides an overview of these arbitrations, and some of the recent Africa accounts for over 11 per cent of global oil production over trends in commercial and treaty cases. the past decade and, according to 2016 figures, holds 7.5 per cent of the world’s proven oil reserves and 7.6 per cent of the world’s Government control of natural resources and the proven gas reserves.3 In addition, Africa has accounted for one- contractual model fifth of the growth in total energy demand in the last five years Because of the wide variety of projects and participants, African and this demand is expected to increase to 20 per cent of the energy projects involve a broad and diverse range of commer- global energy consumption by 2035–2040.4 As discussed below, cial agreements. Natural resources are usually owned by the state, the energy sector has generated a significant number of disputes which means that energy projects often involve a licence from that have been resolved through international arbitration, and this the government (for example, for access to a defined geographic number appears to be increasing. block) and require contractual arrangements between a govern- Energy resources and developments vary by region in Africa. ment (or a state-owned entity, such as a national petroleum com- Oil and gas reserves are concentrated in north and west Africa pany) and a private company (or a group of companies). Many (Nigeria, Angola and Algeria are the continent’s largest oil and projects also involve the creation of joint ventures to share the gas producers).5 A number of countries export natural gas by ship risks and costs associated with such large-scale endeavours, or to in liquefied form (LNG) or by pipeline.6 Coal reserves are mostly meet regulatory requirements. found in the southern part of the continent (South Africa holds For oil and gas projects, many governments initially entered 94 per cent of the proven reserves and accounts for virtually all of into concession agreements with international oil companies the continent’s production).7 While Africa has abundant poten- (IOCs).11 These agreements typically granted the IOC long-term tial for renewable energies, these resources are not yet developed. exploration and development rights over large areas with com- To date, major hydropower projects have been concentrated in plete control over the management of development and no obli- Malawi, Zambia and Lesotho; there have been large-scale wind gation to produce. Today, the most common contractual form is a generation projects in Morocco, Egypt and South Africa; and geo- production sharing agreement (PSA). A PSA typically outlines the thermal power projects in the East African Great Rift Valley in exploration and production rights and obligations between the Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia and Tanzania. parties and how the resource will be shared if discovered in com- Historically, political instability, challenging environmental mercial quantities. Host states prefer PSAs because they usually conditions and economic volatility have meant that fewer explo- afford the government lower financial risk exposure and enable it ration projects have taken place in Africa than in other resource- to participate in the management of the project.12 rich places. That has been changing, however, and increased global In the PSA model, the IOC may be acting on behalf of a competition has brought new participants and investments into the consortium of companies that will enter into a joint operating African energy sector. Significant resource discoveries are giving agreement (JOA) to define their respective rights and obligations rise to complicated, costly and risky energy investment projects. in the project. Consortium members may be party to study and For example, oil discoveries in the Gulf of Guinea have created bid agreements and a number of other agreements with respect investment opportunities with new producer states such as Sierra to the evaluation and acquisition phases of the project. Depending Leone and Liberia.8 Exploration companies are also moving into on how a project develops, there may be additional contracts for countries such as Somalia, which were until recently considered exploration, drilling, transportation and marketing of the oil or too risky due to conflict and political instability. Although the oil gas. Such arrangements may also involve farm-in and farm-out and gas industry continues to attract the most foreign investment, agreements, under which third parties acquire an interest under there have been increased investments in renewable energy. a JOA in return for financial compensation or the provision of Investment in renewables is expected to continue to increase exploration, drilling or other services. Most large projects neces- given the amount of currently untapped renewable resources and sarily involve other contracts as well. For example, there may be its potential to help solve the energy crisis in sub-Saharan Africa, contracts with local and foreign companies to act as consultants, where nearly 600 million people are without access to electricity.9 for the supply of goods and services, and the construction or It is impossible to generalise about arbitration trends in Africa, use of facilities and equipment (including surveying and drilling even by region. However, along with foreign investment, interest equipment). 44 The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2018 © Law Business Research Energy Arbitration in Africa Given the variety of agreements and parties involved in these enforceability of foreign arbitral awards in many African jurisdic- projects, and their scale and complexity, a wide range of issues tions. Only 36 out of 54 African states are signatories to the United can arise between some or all of the parties. The likelihood of Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of disputes is often also increased by the existence of political, envi- Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention). Moreover, ronmental and security issues.13 Some of the many disputes that many African countries do not have modern arbitration laws.16 have arisen include: This means that in almost half of African jurisdictions a party • issues concerning non-payment of invoices and royalty fees; seeking to enforce a foreign arbitral award must depend on pro- • delays, disruptions and cancellations (including force visions of national law that may not be as favourable as in those majeure claims); countries that have ratified and implemented the New York • shareholder and joint venture disputes; Convention. Moreover, even in countries that have signed the • disputes about the scope and transfer of rights; and New York Convention, there may be issues with regard to the • issues about price as well as price adjustment claims in long- implementing legislation, and the local courts may be inexpe- term supply contracts. rienced and unreliable (particularly where a party may be seek- ing to enforce an award against a state or state-owned entity). Many contracts include stabilisation clauses to address potential Nonetheless, international arbitration remains the only choice for legislative or regulatory changes, and disputes also arise regarding most foreign investors in the African energy sector. the application of those clauses. There have also been disputes involving allegations of corrup- Investment treaty arbitration related to African tion, including as a defence to payment claims under consulting energy projects agreements relating to licence agreements or PSAs. A number of disputes relating to energy projects have also been subject to arbitrations arising under investment treaties. African The use of international commercial arbitration in African states are currently party to more than 500 bilateral investment energy contracts treaties (BITs)17 that include protection for the investments of Some disputes relating to energy contracts may be decided in foreign investors and offer arbitration for resolution of disputes local courts. However, when foreign