DOCSLIB.ORG

3 Biodiversity in Marzahn-Hellersdorf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3 Biodiversity in Marzahn-Hellersdorf Countdown 2010 Saving Biodiversity Biodiversity Report 2008 District Marzahn-Hellersdorf in Berlin Biodiversity Report 2008: District Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin Prepared by: Department of Nature and Environment Marzahn-Hellersdorf Lower Administration of Nature Conservation Premnitzer Straße 4 12681 Berlin Germany Tel.: (030) 90293-6700 Fax: (030) 90293-6705 Internet: www.berlin.de/ba-marzahn-hellersdorf/verwaltung/natur/umweltamt.html Author: Ute Stenkewitz, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Supported by: Department Lower Administration of Nature Conservation Landscape planning Klaus Brockmann, Sven Behrend, Sylvia Sievert Nature conservation Liane Nabrowsky, Ilka Maria Menzel, Frank Sporzecki Department Green Spaces Sabine Phenn Front page pictures: Sven Behrend and Sylvia Sievert: Sequence left side, picture 2 Susanna Wilhelm: Sequence left side, pictures 1, 3, 5 Department of Nature and Environment: Sequence left side, picture 4 Angele and Bernhard Schonert: large picture (male sand lizard) Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 2 Content Page 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 THE DISTRICT MARZAHN-HELLERSDORF IN BERLIN 5 2.1 Geography 5 2.2 Climate 5 2.3 Macrochore 5 2.4 Land use 7 3 BIODIVERSITY IN MARZAHN-HELLERSDORF 9 3.1 Protected Areas and Objects 9 3.1.1 Protected Areas, Green Spaces and Natural Monuments 9 3.1.2 Habitat Network 9 3.2 Flora 10 3.3 Fauna 10 3.4 Countdown 2010 Target Species 12 4 COUNTDOWN 2010: GOALS AND ACTORS 13 4.1 Announcement of Countdown 2010 13 4.2 Involved Partners 13 4.3 Supporting Measures for Target Species 14 4.3.1 Protection of Amphibians 14 4.3.2 Protection of Bats 15 4.3.3 Contract Nature Conservation Scheme 16 4.3.4 Support Programmes 16 4.3.5 Urban Agriculture 16 4.4 Sustainable Management of District Areas 18 4.5 Public Relations 19 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 21 6 REFERENCES 22 Info Box The current species extinction rate since human dispersion is estimated to be 100 to 1,000 times greater than the original natural one. To date c. 15,500 species are endangered and human activity has lead to the extinc- tion of c. 840 species in the past 500 years. Example of animals: Today every fourth mammal, every eighth bird, every third amphibian and almost half of all tortoises and turtles are endangered. From 129 of all known extinct bird species, at least 100 died after 1800. And since 1996 the total number of endangered animal species increased from c. 5,000 to 7,260. Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 3 1 Introduction Biological diversity is the diversity of all 1. Countdown 2010 will be introduced to life and natural processes on earth, the district board. including both the diversity within as well as between species and the diversity of 2. Nature conservation aassociations ecosystems. The conservation of biodi- and the Local Agenda 21 group will versity, sustainable use of its compo- be involved in the projects. nents as well as fair compensation of its 3. Supporting measures for the target utilisation is the goal of many countries species and habitat network will be on earth. In 1992, these goals were first conducted (target species: Fire- defined on the UN Convention on Biologi- bellied toad and Noctule bat). cal Diversity (CBD) in Rio de Janeiro and approved by 190 countries. Since that 4. The 2010 biodiversity goal will be time, various meetings took place and integrated in the sustainable man- further countries affiliated to the biodi- agement of the district areas. versity goals and agreements. One of those agreements is Countdown 2010, in 5. The Countdown 2010 declaration and which countries all over the world made biodiversity goal will be accompanied it their business to find ways of saving by intensive public relations (PR). biodiversity until 2010. This is a great responsibility and challenge for all coun- In the following report, an update of the tries and many stakeholders are needed district’s progress in achieving the men- to reach that goal or get closer to it. tioned goals since its participation in May Countdown 2010 is a powerful network 2008 will be presented. of active partners working together towards the 2010 biodiversity target. Each partner commits additional efforts to tackle the causes of biodiversity loss. The secretariat – hosted by the IUCN – facilitates and encourages action, pro- motes the importance of the 2010 biodi- versity target and assesses progress towards 2010. Saving biodiversity begins on the smallest level; first at an individ- ual’s own behaviour, then on a local scale. Marzahn-Hellersdorf and other districts in Berlin signed the Countdown 2010 declaration. The district decided to work on the 2010 biodiversity goal in collaboration with honorary nature con- servationists, clubs and so-called em- ployment projects. The 2010 biodiversity goals of the district are: Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 4 2 The District Marzahn-Hellersdorf in Berlin 2.1 Geography The district Marzahn-Hellersdorf is situ- ated in the Eastern part of Berlin. Its neighbouring districts in the South and Berlin West are Lichtenberg and Treptow- Köpenick. In the North and East it ad- joins to the federal state Brandenburg (counties Barnim and Märkisch- Oderland). It covers an area of 61.8 km² equalling about one eighth of Berlin. The maximum East West extension is c. 9 km and North South extension 12 km. There are five subdivions in Marzahn- Hellersdorf: Marzahn, Hellersdorf, Bies- dorf, Kaulsdorf und Mahlsdorf. The dis- trict has c. 250,000 inhabitants with a Berlin district Marzahn-Hellersdorf and its subdivi- population density of 4,000 people per sions km². 2.2 Climate In general, the climate of urban centres climatic changes compared to those from in comparison to the surrounding areas uninfluenced open land. The mean air is affected by changes in heat balance temperature in Marzahn-Hellersdorf due to strong housing, sealing, lack of between 1961 and 1990 was between vegetation covered areas, etc. Marzahn- 7.6 and 10.1°C. Especially in zone 3, Hellersdorf is located in the city climate there were amongst others less frost zones 1 to 3. That means, there are days and increased mean temperatures moderate (close to city centre, zone 3) compared to the surrounding areas of to very low (close to periphery, zone 1) Berlin. 2.3 Macrochore The northern part of Marzahn-Hellersdorf Barnim plateau and glacial valley of c. 20 is part of a wavy plane on a ground m. Between these two zones, along the moraine being remnants of the last overlap slope (Barnim slope) is the so glacial drift called the Barnim plateau. called “Berlin Balcony”, a well-known The southern part is situated in the attraction for inhabitants as well as depression of the Berlin glacial valley. tourists. There is an altitude difference between Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 5 The Green City Map of the district Marzahn-Hellersdorf in Berlin. Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 6 2.4 Land use Today, the Barnim plateau consists of The landscape of the Barnim plateau is the densely populated large suburban formed by the Wuhle River – the so housing estate in the North of Marzahn- called green middle of the district – Hellersdorf - the largest of its kind in various puddles and remnants of sewage Germany. Two thirds of the district’s fields, while it is the Kaulsdorfer lakes inhabitants live there. This high density and the Barnim slope in the glacial val- housing area encompassing more than ley. The Barnim slope and Wuhle valley 100,000 flats and was built between are significant areas for both local rec- 1977 and 1990 to solve the housing reation as well as the formation of cool- problem in the former German Democ- ing air zones, which are important for the ratic Republic (GDR). It covers about one inner city climate, habitat and species third of the district. Beside flats, also conservation. social facilities such as schools or kinder- The largest part beside living and traffic gartens were created there. Opposite, areas and industrial real estates are the southern part of Marzahn-Hellersdorf recreational areas such as gardens, consists of small house estates, which green spaces and parks. In total, 15 % cover about two-thirds of the district. of the district comprises green and open spaces putting Marzahn-Hellersdorf on the third place of all Berlin districts. Various sights offer attractive and all- round activities for inhabitants as well as visitors. Just to mention a few: 3 the recreational park Gardens of the world 3 the windmill Marzahn 3 the castle Biesdorf 3 the manor Mahlsdorf with museum from the period of promoterism 3 the ORWO house 3 the animal farmyard Alt-Marzahn 3 the tower museum in the Kaulsdorf church 3 the hiking trails through the district (e. g. Wuhle-Hönow-Trail, Wuhletal- Hiking Trail, Barnim Slope or New Ur- Map section from the area of former sewage banity) fields in Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin. Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 7 Details from the large suburban housing estate in the North. The small housing estates in the South of Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin. (Pictures by Behrend und Sievert) Biodiversity Report l Marzahn-Hellersdorf, Berlin l 2008 8 3 Biodiversity in Marzahn-Hellersdorf 3.1 Protected Areas and Objects 3.1.1 Protected Areas, Green Spaces and Natural Monuments The most important areas for flora and nature reserve, two landscape conserva- fauna in the Marzahn-Hellersdorf are tion areas, three protected landscape urban waste land and horticulturally components and many protected bio- formed biotopes that open the housing topes, green spaces and natural monu- structures and offer space for recreation ments. and nature protection.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Approaches to the Conservation of Rare Arable Plants in Germany
    26. Deutsche Arbeitsbesprechung über Fragen der Unkrautbiologie und -bekämpfung, 11.-13. März 2014 in Braunschweig New approaches to the conservation of rare arable plants in Germany Neue Ansätze zum Artenschutz gefährdeter Ackerwildpflanzen in Deutschland Harald Albrecht1*, Julia Prestele2, Sara Altenfelder1, Klaus Wiesinger2 and Johannes Kollmann1 1Lehrstuhl für Renaturierungsökologie, Emil-Ramann-Str. 6, Technische Universität München, 85354 Freising, Deutschland 2Institut für Ökologischen Landbau, Bodenkultur und Ressourcenschutz, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL), Lange Point 12, 85354 Freising, Deutschland *Korrespondierender Autor, [email protected] DOI 10.5073/jka.2014.443.021 Zusammenfassung Der rasante technische Fortschritt der Landwirtschaft während der letzten Jahrzehnte hat einen dramatischen Rückgang seltener Ackerwildpflanzen verursacht. Um diesem Rückgang Einhalt zu gebieten, wurden verschiedene Artenschutzkonzepte wie das Ackerrandstreifenprogramm oder das aktuelle Programm ‘100 Äcker für die Vielfalt’ entwickelt. Für Sand- und Kalkäcker sind geeignete Bewirtschaftungsmethoden zur Erhaltung seltener Arten inzwischen gut erforscht. Für saisonal vernässte Ackerflächen, die ebenfalls viele seltene Arten aufweisen können, ist dagegen wenig über naturschutzfachlich geeignet Standortfaktoren und Bewirtschaftungsmethoden bekannt. Untersuchungen an sieben zeitweise überstauten Ackersenken bei Parstein (Brandenburg) zeigten, dass das Überstauungsregime und insbesondere die Dauer der Überstauung die Artenzusammensetzung
    [Show full text]
  • 15 International Symposium on Ostracoda
    Berliner paläobiologische Abhandlungen 1-160 6 Berlin 2005 15th International Symposium on Ostracoda In Memory of Friedrich-Franz Helmdach (1935-1994) Freie Universität Berlin September 12-15, 2005 Abstract Volume (edited by Rolf Kohring and Benjamin Sames) 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preface The 15th International Symposium on Ostracoda takes place in Berlin in September 2005, hosted by the Institute of Geological Sciences of the Freie Universität Berlin. This is the second time that the International Symposium on Ostracoda has been held in Germany, following the 5th International Symposium in Hamburg in 1974. The relative importance of Ostracodology - the science that studies Ostracoda - in Germany is further highlighted by well-known names such as G.W. Müller, Klie, Triebel and Helmdach, and others who stand for the long tradition of research on Ostracoda in Germany. During our symposium in Berlin more than 150 participants from 36 countries will meet to discuss all aspects of living and fossil Ostracoda. We hope that the scientific communities working on the biology and palaeontology of Ostracoda will benefit from interesting talks and inspiring discussions - in accordance with the symposium's theme: Ostracodology - linking bio- and geosciences We wish every participant a successful symposium and a pleasant stay in Berlin Berlin, July 27th 2005 Michael Schudack and Steffen Mischke CONTENT Schudack, M. and Mischke, S.: Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin - Wikipedia
    Berlin - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin Coordinates: 52°30′26″N 13°8′45″E Berlin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Berlin (/bɜːrˈlɪn, ˌbɜːr-/, German: [bɛɐ̯ˈliːn]) is the capital and the largest city of Germany as well as one of its 16 Berlin constituent states, Berlin-Brandenburg. With a State of Germany population of approximately 3.7 million,[4] Berlin is the most populous city proper in the European Union and the sixth most populous urban area in the European Union.[5] Located in northeastern Germany on the banks of the rivers Spree and Havel, it is the centre of the Berlin- Brandenburg Metropolitan Region, which has roughly 6 million residents from more than 180 nations[6][7][8][9], making it the sixth most populous urban area in the European Union.[5] Due to its location in the European Plain, Berlin is influenced by a temperate seasonal climate. Around one- third of the city's area is composed of forests, parks, gardens, rivers, canals and lakes.[10] First documented in the 13th century and situated at the crossing of two important historic trade routes,[11] Berlin became the capital of the Margraviate of Brandenburg (1417–1701), the Kingdom of Prussia (1701–1918), the German Empire (1871–1918), the Weimar Republic (1919–1933) and the Third Reich (1933–1945).[12] Berlin in the 1920s was the third largest municipality in the world.[13] After World War II and its subsequent occupation by the victorious countries, the city was divided; East Berlin was declared capital of East Germany, while West Berlin became a de facto West German exclave, surrounded by the Berlin Wall [14] (1961–1989) and East German territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateglacial and Early Holocene Environments and Human Occupation in Brandenburg, Eastern Germany
    Franziska Kobe1, Martin K. Bittner1, Christian Leipe1,2, Philipp Hoelzmann3, Tengwen Long4, Mayke Wagner5, Romy Zibulski1, Pavel E. Tarasov1* 1 Institute of Geological Sciences, Paleontology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany 2 Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research (ISEE), Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan 3 Institute of Geographical Sciences, Physical Geography, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany 4 School of Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China 5 Eurasia Department and Beijing Branch Office, German Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany *Corresponding author: [email protected] LATEGLACIAL AND EARLY HOLOCENE ENVIRONMENTS AND HUMAN OCCUPATION IN BRANDENBURG, EASTERN GERMANY ABSTRACT. The paper reports on the results of the pollen, plant macrofossil and geochemical analyses and the AMS 14C-based chronology of the «Rüdersdorf» outcrop situated east of Berlin in Brandenburg (Germany). The postglacial landscape changed from an open one to generally forested by ca. 14 cal. kyr BP. Woody plants (mainly birch and pine) contributed up to 85% to the pollen assemblages ca. 13.4–12.5 cal. kyr BP. The subsequent Younger Dryas (YD) interval is characterized by a decrease in arboreal pollen (AP) to 75% but led neither to substantial deforestation nor spread of tundra vegetation. This supports the concept that the YD cooling was mainly limited to the winter months, while summers remained comparably warm and allowed much broader (than initially believed) spread of cold-tolerant boreal trees. Further support for this theory comes from the fact that the relatively low AP values persisted until ca. 10.6 cal. kyr BP, when the «hazel phase» of the regional vegetation succession began.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry) (Edition 2004)
    Senate Department for Urban Development 02.01 Water Quality (Chemistry) (Edition 2004) Overview / Statistical Base Berlin is located between the two major river basins of the Elbe and the Oder. The Spree and the Havel are the most important natural watercourses in the Berlin area. Additional natural watercourses include the Dahme, Fredersdorf Creek, the Straussberg Mill Stream, the Neuenhagen Mill Stream, the Wuhle, the Panke and Tegel Creek. Besides these natural bodies of water, there are a number of artificial bodies of water within the municipal area of Berlin, the canals. These include prominently the Teltow Canal, the Landwehr Canal and the Berlin Shipping Canal, with the Hohenzollern Canal. The Spree is of special significance for the quality condition of Berlin streams. The canals in Berlin are predominantly fed by Spree water, so that their quality is influenced by the quality of that water. Since its effluent quantities are considerably higher than those in the upper Havel, the condition of the Spree water also decisively affects the quality of the Havel below the mouth of the Spree. In turn, the water condition of the Spree in the city is determined by numerous smaller tributaries within the municipal area. Among Germany’s rivers, the Spree ranks only in the lower medium range. In comparison with the Oder (long-term mean flow at Hohensaaten-Finow: 543 cu.m./sec.) or the Elbe (long-term mean flow at Barby: 558 cu.m./sec.), the Spree and Havel, even when combined in the lower Havel, have only about one tenth the flow. A quality measurement network is operated to monitor the quality of Berlin’s surface bodies of water; it concentrates as a matter of priority on ascertaining the impact of the numerous point-sources and diffuse water pollution sources along the course of the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Forstbotanische Garten Eberswalde Und Sein Umland Sowie Die 40. Brandenburgische Botanikertagung
    251 Verh. Bot. Ver. Berlin Brandenburg 143: 251-269, Berlin 2010 Der Forstbotanische Garten Eberswalde und sein Umland sowie die 40. Brandenburgische Botanikertagung Die 40. Brandenburgische Botanikertagung fand vom 26. bis 29. Juni 2009 in Eberswalde statt, das 1859 Gründungsort des Botanischen Vereins war. Am 26. Juni leitete ENDTMANN von 14:00 bis 17:00 Uhr die Exkursion durch das Solitär- arboretum des Forstbotanischen Gartens Eberswalde (FBG), Teile des Kleinbe- standsarboretums sowie die unweit entfernte Echowiese (Klingelbeutelwiese) und deren Umgebung. Von 19:00 bis 20:00 Uhr schloss sich sein Einführungsvortrag "Landschaft und Vegetation um Eberswalde“ an. Über obige Themen kann nur sehr kurz und zusammenfassend berichtet werden. Daher sei speziell auf vertiefende Literatur und die darin zitierten Arbeiten verwiesen. 1. Exkursionen im Solitärarboretum 1.1 Kurzbemerkungen zur Geschichte des Forstbotanischen Gartens Der "Forstgarten“ Eberswalde wurde 1830 durch WILHELM PFEIL und insbesondere THEODOR RATZEBURG gegründet. Ab 1868 erfolgte die Verlegung von diesem "Pfeilsgarten“ auf die heutige Fläche. Die Entwicklung des Forstbotanischen Gar- tens wurde unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten mehrfach erläutert, vor allem durch SEELIGER (1968, 1975, 1980) und ENDTMANN (1988, 1994, 1997). Halb- schematische Karten zur Lage und Größe der Teilflächen des FBG in den Jahren 1831, 1872, 1945, 1988 finden sich bei ENDTMANN (1988, Karte 1). Hier werden auch Nachzeichnungen alter Gartenpläne des heutigen Solitärarboretums gegeben (Karten 2-8; um 1872, 1900, 1930 und 1988), weiterhin Pläne vom Kleinbestands- arboretum sowie zum DENGLER-Garten mit seinen Kreuzungs- und Provenienz- Versuchen (= Versuchen zur geographischen Herkunft). Neben schrittweisen Flächenvergrößerungen und Erhöhungen der Artenzahl wies der FBG auch tiefe Entwicklungseinschnitte auf (Stagnationen und Rück- schläge).
    [Show full text]
  • Landschaftsrahmenplan LRP+ Landkreis Barnim
    Landschaftsrahmenplan LRP+ Landkreis Barnim Teil II Bestand und Entwicklungsziele Landschaftsrahmenplan LRP+ Landkreis Barnim Teil II Bestand und Entwicklungsziele Dezember 2018 Landkreis Barnim Amt für Kataster- und Vermessungswesen, Natur- und Denkmalschutz Untere Naturschutzbehörde Paul-Wunderlich-Haus Am Markt 1 16225 Eberswalde Bearbeitung: Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management Alfred-Möller-Str. 1 16225 Eberswalde Autoren und Autorinnen: Anja Krause, Angela Dichte, Judith Kloiber, Antonia Diel, Jürgen Peters, Annemarie Wilitzki, Steffen Kriewald, Stephan Thies, Jeanette S. Blumröder, Maritta Wolf, Katharina Luttmann, Norman Hess & Pierre L. Ibisch Mit thematischen Karten von Monika Hoffmann und Kevin Beiler Der Landschaftsrahmenplan entstand im Rahmen des Projekts ‘Partizipative und ökosystembasierte Anpassung an den Klimawandel – Landschaftsrahmenplanung als Kommunikations- und Gestaltungsprozess‘ (Anpass.Bar). Gefördert vom Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit aufgrund eines Beschlusses des Deutschen Bundestages. Förderkennzeichen 03DAS062 [Der Landschaftsrahmenplan ist gemäß § 6 (2) BbgNatSchG vom Ministerium für Ländliche Entwicklung, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz des Landes Brandenburg genehmigt. Diese Genehmigung gilt als erteilt am … 2019 und ergeht in Verbindung mit dem Genehmigungsbescheid.] Aufbau des Dokuments Die Inhalte des Landschaftsrahmenplanes werden in vier Teilen dargestellt. • Teil 1 - Einleitung und Methodik • Teil 2 - Diagnostik
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Aquaculture
    Urban Aquaculture Water-sensitive transformation of cityscapes via blue-green infrastructures vorgelegt von Dipl.-Ing. Grit Bürgow geb. in Berlin von der Fakultät VI Planen Bauen Umwelt der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr.-Ing. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzende: Prof. Undine Gisecke Gutachter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Stefan Heiland Gutachterin: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Angela Million (Uttke) Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Ranka Junge Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 25. November 2013 Berlin 2014 Schriftenreihe der Reiner Lemoine-Stiftung Grit Bürgow Urban Aquaculture Water-sensitive transformation of cityscapes via blue-green infrastructures D 83 (Diss. TU Berlin) Shaker Verlag Aachen 2014 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Zugl.: Berlin, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2013 Titelfoto: (c) Rayko Huß Copyright Shaker Verlag 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. Printed in Germany. ISBN 978-3-8440-3262-8 ISSN 2193-7575 Shaker Verlag GmbH • P.O. BOX 101818 • D-52018 Aachen Phone: 0049/2407/9596-0 • Telefax: 0049/2407/9596-9 Internet: www.shaker.de
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Jahresbericht 2013
    Annual Report Jahresbericht 2013 Jahresbericht 2013 Annual Report 2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis Content 7 ZALF – Porträt ZALF – Portrait 9 Vorwort Foreword 12 Die Kernthemen des ZALF ZALF‘s Research Domains 14 ZALF Querschnittsprojekte ZALF cross sector projects 15 Hämatophage Arthropoden – Blutsauger Haematophagous arthropods 18 Grünland Grasslands 20 WatEff WatEff 21 LandStructure LandStructure 22 CarboZALF CarboZALF 23 Biodiversität Biodiversity 24 Historische Ökologie – HIS_ECO Historical Ecology – HIS_ECO 25 Impact ZALF Impact ZALF 26 Leuchtturmprojekte Lighthouse projects 28 Forensische Hydrologie Forensic hydrology 36 Das Orchester der Simulationsmodelle The orchestra of simulation models 44 Die Biodiversitäts-Exploratorien Biodiversity Exploratories 56 smallFOREST – Ökosystemleistungen kleiner Wald- fragmente in europäischen Landschaften smallFOREST – Biodiversity and ecosystem services of small forest fragments in European landscapes 64 ZALF in der Welt: Netzwerk LIAISE ZALF in the world: Network LIAISE 72 Forschungstransfer in Partnerschaft Research transfer in partnership 76 Personalia und Kommunikation Particulars and Communication 78 Nachwuchs Young researchers 96 Qualifikationen Qualifications 100 Nachwuchsförderung Promotion of young researchers 102 Ämter und Funktionen Offices and tasks 106 Medien- und Pressearbeit Media and press relations 107 Veranstaltungen Events 112 Gäste mit Forschungsaufenthalt Guests with research sojourn 113 Forschungsaufenthalt im Ausland Research sojourn abroad 114 Fakten und Daten Facts and Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Beitrag Des BUND Landesarbeitskreises Wasser Berlin-Brandenburg Zur Stellungnahme Der Berliner Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Natursc
    Beitrag des BUND Landesarbeitskreises Wasser Berlin-Brandenburg zur Stellungnahme der Berliner Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Naturschutz (BLN) betreffend die Anhörung zu den wichtigen Wasserbewirtschaftungsfragen für die Aufstellung des Bewirtschaftungsplans WRRL für den dritten Bewirtschaftungszeitraum in der Flussgebietsgemeinschaft (FGG) Elbe1- hier: Berliner Gewässer Berlin, 19.06.2020 1 FGG Elbe (o.A.J.): Anhörung zu den wichtigen Wasserbewirtschaftungsfragen für die Aufstellung des Bewirtschaftungsplans WRRL für den dritten Bewirtschaftungszeitraum in der Flussgebietsgemeinschaft (FGG) Elbe. Abrufbar über folgenden Weblink: https://www.fgg-elbe.de/anhoerung/wichtige-wasserbewirtschaftungsfragen- 2020.html 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................................................ 3 1. Eine aktive Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung fördern und Risiken durch Akzeptanzdefizite abwenden .. 5 2. Biodiversitätsverlust aufhalten - alle Gewässerlebensräume schützen und verbinden .................... 7 3. Personalmangel und weitere institutionelle Ressourcenfragen thematisieren und klären ............... 9 4. Aufgaben und Pflichten verbindlich zuweisen............................................................................... 10 5. zu Anlage I - I (Verbesserung der Gewässerstruktur und Durchgängigkeit): Zentrale Probleme auch hinsichtlich der Flächenverfügbarkeit, Unterhaltung und Zuständigkeiten lösen ..................... 11 6. zu Anlage I-II (Reduktion der
    [Show full text]
  • 02.07 Depth to the Water Table (Edition 2007)
    Senate Department for Urban Development 02.07 Depth to the Water Table (Edition 2007) Overview Groundwater levels in a metropolitan area like Berlin are subject not only to such natural factors as precipitation, evaporation and subterranean outflows, but are also strongly influenced by such human factors as water withdrawal, construction, surface permeability, drainage facilities, and recharge. The main factors of withdrawal include the groundwater demands of public water suppliers, private water discharge (cf. Map 02.11), and the lowering of groundwater levels at construction sites. Groundwater recharge is accomplished by precipitation (cf. Map 02.13.5), shore filtration, artificial recharge with surface water, and return of groundwater at construction sites. In Berlin, there are two potentiometric surfaces (groundwater layers). The deeper level carries salt water and is separated from the upper potentiometric surface by an approx. 80 meter thick layer of clay, except at occasional fault points in the clay. The upper level carries fresh water and has an average thickness of 150 meters. It is the source of Berlin’s drinking (potable) and process (non- potable) water supplies. It consists of a variable combination of permeable and cohesive loose sediments. Sand and gravel (permeable layers) combine to form the groundwater aquifer, while the clay, silt and organic silt (cohesive layers) constitute the aquitard. The potentiometric surface is dependent on the (usually slight) gradient of groundwater and the terrain morphology (cf. Fig. 1). Fig. 1: Terminological definition of depth to the water table at unconfined and confined groundwater 1 The depth to the water table is defined as the perpendicular distance between the upper edge of the surface and the upper edge of the groundwater surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Berlin Groundwater Levels
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 6 8 0 2 4 8 0 4 6 2 2 8 0 4 3 7 0 4 7 0 6 0 6 9 3 1 4 8 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 38800 4 38800 ! ! ! ! 5 8 5 ! 9 ! ! 57 ! 6 1 ! 6 !! ! 0 ! ! ! ! 5 ! 7 ! ! Hennigsdorf 6 ! ! 56 7 6 6 5 9 6 6 8 5 " 6 " Stolpe 6 6 ! 5 ! 5 ! 5 4 6 ! 5 Zepernick 6 ! 3 36400 ! 36400 ! 2 5 ! ! 54 4 ! ! 3 6 6 1 5 " 0 1 3 3 8 53 5 32 9 52 5 8 ! 52 ! ! 3 ! 1 ! 5 ! 1 ! Geologic Atlas ! 3 ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! 5 ! 0 ! 51 ! ! ! of Berlin ! ! 34000 3 34000 6 4 9 3 50 5 " Werneuchen 5 8 3 4 4 9 5 7 5 6 5 48 5 5 4 3 3 8 4 l 31600 31600 3 2 5 3 47 a Groundwater Levels 46 5 5 9 31 t 2 of Berlin 43 45 31 e 44 51 29200 5 29200 0 ! 4 ! 3 4 ! 4 9 of the Main Aquifer and 2 k ! 58 ! 4 ! 2 4 8 ! ! ! 0 4 ! 3 ! 1 ! n 4 ! 7 ! ! Panke Valley Aquifer ! 5 ! 7 4 ! 0 ! a ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! 3 ! ! Tegel P 9 ! 9 ! ! 41 5 ! ! " 6 2 ! ! ! ! ! 3 in May 2010 ! ! ! 3 3 ! 3 3 8 ! ! 5 6 5 ! 4 7 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! 4 ! ! 0 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 ! 3 4 ! ! 3 3 ! ! ! 9 26800 ! ! 26800 ! ! ! 4 53 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! 0 ! 3 ! ! ! ! 4 ! 4 ! ! ! 2 ! 3 5 ! 3 2 9 ! 0 ! 0 ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! 2 2 2 ! ! ! 9 ! ! 7 ! 8 2 !! ! ! 8 ! ! 4 51 a ! 6 ! ! ! ! Barnim-Hochfläche 5 ! ! 4 3 0 Spandau ! ! 5 ! 4 4 ! 4 2 9 !
    [Show full text]