The Current Status and Control of Horseweed (Conyza Canadensis) in Ohio Soybean (Glycine Max) Production
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Current Status and Control of Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Ohio Soybean (Glycine max) Production Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alyssa Irene Lamb Graduate Program in Horticulture and Crop Science The Ohio State University 2018 Thesis Committee Dr. Mark Loux, Advisor Dr. Alex Lindsey Dr. Emilie Regnier 1 Copyrighted by Alyssa Irene Lamb 2018 2 Abstract Studies were conducted from 2013 through 2017 with the objectives of: 1) optimizing a cereal rye cover crop program for the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in soybean production; and 2) determining the frequency, infestation level, and distribution of some of the most common and troublesome weeds in Ohio soybean fields as well as the spatial and temporal distribution of horseweed populations. Two studies were conducted simultaneously from fall of 2016 to fall of 2017 to evaluate how the planting date and seeding rate of a cereal rye cover crop affect horseweed population density, and the utility of cereal rye to aid or replace control from spring preplant residual (Study I) or fall herbicides (Study II). There was no difference in horseweed population density as a result of rye planting date in either study. The rye seeding rate affected horseweed density throughout the season in both studies. Horseweed density was greater in the absence of rye compared to either seeding rate. In Study I, the flumioxazin + metribuzin spring preplant residual reduced horseweed density in June compared with no or low level residual. In July, the flumioxazin + metribuzin treatments had a reduced horseweed density compared to the nontreated, but the flumioxazin alone was not different than the mixture or nontreated. In Study II, the fall herbicide treatment reduced horseweed density until July compared with the absence of a fall treatment. These results suggest that cereal rye used as a cover crop before no-till iii soybeans can reduce GR horseweed plant density, but that fall herbicide treatments and comprehensive spring residual programs are still important to ensure effective GR horseweed control into the growing season. A survey was conducted annually from 2013 through 2017 in 49 to 52 counties in Ohio soybean fields to assess the frequency, infestation level, and distribution of horseweed, giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), and three Amaranthus or ‘pigweed’ species. Horseweed was the most frequently encountered species in all years, followed by giant ragweed, pigweeds, and common ragweed, respectively. Horseweed also had the greatest number of infestations (highest density) each year, followed by giant ragweed, common ragweed, and pigweed species, respectively. Spatial cores of interest, or counties identified as having significant levels of horseweed infestations or lack thereof, relative to surrounding counties, were identified in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, but not 2017. However, the lowest total frequency of horseweed occurred in 2017, which coincided with second highest frequency of infestations among years. There was no distinct distribution or pattern of horseweed movement within the state from year to year, but there did seem to be an increase in counties with one to three infested fields over time compared to the early years of the survey where many counties had one or no infested fields. These results suggest that horseweed persists as a common and troublesome threat to Ohio soybean producers, and that growers should still consider making horseweed management a priority when developing weed control programs. iv Vita May 2011 .................................................... Westfall High School December 2015 ........................................... B.S. Agricultural Business and Applied Economics, The Ohio State University January 2016 ............................................... Graduate Research Associate, The Ohio State University August 2016 ................................................ Graduate Research Fellow, The Ohio State University August 2017 ................................................ Graduate Research Associate, The Ohio State University January 2018 to present ............................... Graduate Teaching Associate, The Ohio State University Field of Study Major Field: Horticulture and Crop Science v Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... iii Vita ................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables ............................................................................................................... vii List of Figures ................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1. Literature Review ........................................................................................... 1 Bibliography .............................................................................................................. 19 Chapter 2. Optimizing a Cereal Rye Cover Crop Program for the Control of Glyphosate- Resistant Horseweed in No-Till Soybeans ..................................................................... 26 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 26 Objectives.................................................................................................................. 28 Materials & Methods ................................................................................................. 28 Results & Discussion ................................................................................................. 33 Bibliography .............................................................................................................. 41 Chapter 3. The Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Horseweed in Ohio Soybean Production Fields from 2013 to 2017 ............................................................................. 57 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 57 Objectives.................................................................................................................. 59 Materials & Methods ................................................................................................. 59 Results & Discussion ................................................................................................. 62 Bibliography ............................................................................................................ 107 Thesis Bibliography..................................................................................................... 109 vi List of Tables Table 2.1 ANOVA results of horseweed density measurements from Study I examining planting date and seeding rate of a rye cover crop and spring residual treatments. .......... 44 Table 2.2 ANOVA results of horseweed density measurements from Study II examining rye planting date and seeding rate of a rye cover crop and fall herbicide treatments. ...... 45 Table 2.3 Effect of rye seeding rate on horseweed density in Study I, averaged over rye planting date and spring residual herbicide level. ........................................................... 46 Table 2.4 Effect of rye seeding rate on horseweed density in Study II, averaged over planting date and fall herbicide treatments. .................................................................... 47 Table 2.5 Effect of spring preplant residual herbicide on horseweed density in Study I, averaged over rye planting date and seeding rate. .......................................................... 48 Table 2.6 Effect of fall herbicide treatment on horseweed density in Study II, averaged over rye planting date and seeding rate. ......................................................................... 49 Table 2.7 Effect of interaction between rye planting date and fall herbicide treatment on horseweed density in Study II, averaged over rye seeding rate. ...................................... 50 Table 2.8 ANOVA results of rye planting date, seeding rate, and date by rate interaction on rye biomass in both studies. ...................................................................................... 51 Table 2.9 Effect of rye planting date on fall and spring rye biomass averaged over seeding rate and herbicide treatment in both studies. ...................................................... 52 vii Table 2.10 Effect of rye seeding rate on fall and spring rye biomass averaged over planting date and herbicide treatment in both studies. .................................................... 53 Table 2.11 Effect of the planting date by seeding rate interaction on fall and spring rye biomass averaged over herbicide treatment in both studies............................................. 54 Table 3.1 Weed species with reported cases of resistance to herbicides and multiple herbicide sites of action in Ohio. .................................................................................... 68 Table 3.2 Overall frequency of weeds (all ratings) in soybean fields just prior to harvest – 2013 to 2017. ................................................................................................................