Animal Rights Terrorists: What Every Neuroscientist Should Know

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Animal Rights Terrorists: What Every Neuroscientist Should Know The Journal of Neuroscience, September 16, 2009 • 29(37):11419–11420 • 11419 Commentary Animal Rights Terrorists: What Every Neuroscientist Should Know Jeffrey H. Kordower Chairman, Committee for Use of Animals in Research, Society for Neuroscience Department of Neurological Sciences and Research Center for Brain Repair, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612 Introduction can be traced to the publication of Animal research using great apes (which, inciden- The disgraceful, illegal, and immoral tac- Liberation in 1975 by Philosophy Profes- tally, is the only genus that can be effec- tics used by animal rights activists to for- sor Peter Singer. Singer is now viewed as tively used to model human hepatitis C ward their agenda have led to the federal the father of the modern animal rights infection). These are just a few of the nu- government labeling them as domestic movement. In 1981, Alex Pacheco and merous activities of these groups over the terrorists, a very well deserved categorical Ingrid Newkirk formed People for the past three decades. name. The types of terrorism engendered Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) in So, with their widespread and danger- by these groups are varied, but most re- Washington, DC. These two events cata- ous activities, why has our membership cently their most violent and troublesome pulted animal rights activism into the been relatively silent on this matter? It is acts have occurred at the homes of neuro- popular public mindset. While their mis- difficult to say, but one theory is that these scientists. Drs. Ringach and Jentsch have guided message about the responsible use activities have been predominantly di- detailed many of these terrorist attacks in of animals in research was heard, their rected against researchers using nonhu- their accompanying commentary, and I methods of operation received less atten- man primates and companion animals, will not review them here. However, do tion. They fully support the burning the small minority of SfN members. The not let the preponderance of violent ani- down of laboratories. Indeed, Newkirk majority of members perform research on mal rights activity occurring in California has been quoted as saying so on numerous rodents, and they might conclude that this mislead you into thinking that Society for occasions (see http://www.activistcash. is “not my problem.” Wrong! The violent Neuroscience (SfN) members in other com/biography_quotes.cfm/bid/456). The activities of these animal rights activists states are immune to the situation. These Animal Liberation Front (ALF) sets fire to are no longer exclusive to researchers that violent acts occur across the country, with mink farms at Oregon State and Michigan work with unusual species: a number of researchers in Utah, Connecticut, Oregon, State Universities. Other groups, such as researchers who work with rodents have as well as numerous other locales having Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) recently been targeted and attacked with reported violent attacks at their homes, attacked the Huntingdon Life Sciences the same violence and vigor as their col- often in the presence of children. Let us and its shareholders. The company and its leagues. Now, everyone is at risk and a also be clear about the individuals whom shareholders were completely unaware of strong outcry by our membership is they are attacking. These scientists have the reason they were attacked (they pro- needed. not just been performing research on an- vided loans for companies performing an- So, what should researchers and SfN imals: all have been performing responsi- ble research on animals, using procedures imal research), and the company nearly members do? The first part is easy. Go to that have been approved by the National collapsed financially. In 2000, ALF stole http://www.ucla-pro-test.org/. This is a Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Insti- dozens of research animals from laborato- website created by University of Califor- tutional Animal Care and Use Commit- ries at the University of Minnesota, and in nia, Los Angeles (UCLA) faculty in a stand tees (IACUC) of their universities. 2004, they broke into University of Iowa against the animal rights terrorists. Sign While these activists’ strategy of terror- laboratories, causing hundreds of thou- the petition at www.raisingvoices.net, izing investigators and their families at sands of dollars in damages. These and take a stand against these violent crimi- their homes may be relatively new, these other groups also disrupt science by using nals, and take a stand for the responsible actions and their intent to terrorize are legal, but harassing, methods such as a use of animals in research. Second, down- not. The origin of animal rights activism continuous flurry of Freedom of Informa- load the Best Practices document from the tion Act (FOIA) requests and IACUC mis- SfN website. This is a document that has conduct claims, most of which have been created and vetted by the Committee Received Aug. 3, 2009; accepted Aug. 5, 2009. been found to be completely baseless af- for the Use of Animals in Research (CAR) Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Jeffrey H. Kordower, Depart- ter costly investigation. Other efforts in- at SfN, a committee I am honored to mentofNeurologicalSciences,RushUniversityMedicalCenter,1735WestHar- clude legal maneuvers to grant animals chair. This document is based upon the rison Street, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: [email protected]. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3764-09.2009 “personage,” or legal rights equal to hu- UCLA Task Force document that was cre- Copyright©2009SocietyforNeuroscience 0270-6474/09/2911419-02$15.00/0 mans, and combating even noninvasive ated following a series of violent attacks 11420 • J. Neurosci., September 16, 2009 • 29(37):11419–11420 Kordower • Commentary on their faculty. While the University of with affected researchers. It should ensure that we educate the public on the appro- California system might be properly criti- that these personnel are on call at all times priateness of responsible research using cized for initially moving slowly on this and have the ability to easily communi- animals, and on the health benefits they front, they have become welcome leaders cate with top administration officials. have provided both humans and nonhu- and champions for their embattled fac- The university should develop a plan mans. Talking points for these concepts ulty, and all SfN members should be with local law enforcement. The univer- can be found at the SfN website. grateful for their generosity in sharing sity should develop a formal process for Finally, I and many of my colleagues their taskforce findings with us. The doc- responding to threats against personal have been greatly disappointed by the fail- ument is meant for any researcher to take and physical safety. ure of NIH to take a stronger stand against to their university leadership to serve as a The university should establish an or- animal rights terrorists. Articles have been plan for protecting researchers under at- ganizational structure that anticipates and written by high-ranking NIH officials tack. It should be presented before any forestalls threats to a researcher. The uni- condemning their activities; e.g., http:// attack or threat of attack occurs. This versity should establish or strengthen se- www.nih.gov/about/director/02082008_ document is not specific for animal rights curity protocols. The university should issues and would prove valuable for re- ensure regular and effective communica- statement_UCLAresearcher.htm. That is searchers under attack for any reason tions between security personnel and good. However, it remains hard to imag- (e.g., use of human fetal tissue or human community law enforcement to avoid ine how words alone will have any mate- embryonic stem cells in research). The gaps in protection. rial impact on the behavior of these document is divided into three parts and a criminals. The leadership of SfN, includ- summary of its concepts are detailed Part 3: Communication and advocacy ing CAR members like myself, have solic- below: The university should actively pursue the ited NIH to mandate that all custodians of introduction and passage of federal, state, their research funds (i.e., virtually all uni- Part 1: Leadership and administration and local legislation and regulations that versities and other institutions perform- University leaders should provide regular, would protect research. They should urge ing research) have a protection plan in explicit public affirmation from the insti- lawmakers to ensure consistency of pro- place for their researchers. Common tutional leadership in support of aca- tective coverage across jurisdictions. They sense would seem to dictate that if NIH demic freedom and state the institutional should proactively build relationships with can mandate the existence of IACUC, In- commitment to ensuring the protection reporters to convey accurate information stitutional Review Board (IRB), and other of those individuals exercising it. In cases about responsible research, as well as spe- oversight committees to protect animals in which researchers are under attack, the cific research being conducted at the facility, and clinical trial patients before receiving university should pursue legal measures, and they should regularly examine student- NIH funding, a similar requirement can public declarations, statements of sup- university organizations, in keeping with be instituted for the protection of the in- port, and provisions of accurate informa- standards of protected activity. dividuals performing the research. The tion to the public and other forms of I have taken this document to my ad- Best Practices document described above sustaining moral and psychological sup- ministration, it was well received, and it can serve as a template for such a plan. This port. When illegal activities occur, univer- has been adopted. I and my colleagues are request has fallen on deaf ears. Hopefully, sity leadership should publicly support safer because of it. and encourage prosecution to the fullest The CAR committee at SfN as well as with the appointment of a new director of extent of the law.
Recommended publications
  • Internship at Peta, Berlin: a Perfect Experience for Anyone Interested in Animal Protection
    INTERNSHIP AT PETA, BERLIN: A PERFECT EXPERIENCE FOR ANYONE INTERESTED IN ANIMAL PROTECTION In this chronicle, I will describe Scandinavia and Southern Europe, many areas in which the organization my curricular internship at PETA’s PETA Germany covers animal rights works. Germany office in Berlin, realized issues all over Eastern Europe. The under Krishna Singh1 ’s tutorship organization also has other affiliates: Communication from May 22nd till June 8th of. PETA France, PETA Netherlands, According to the country’s context or This document first describes the the issue at stake, PETA deals with organization itself and its areas of the question of how to communicate work (1) as well as its welcoming and about animal rights issue. To this end, friendly office in Berlin (2) and goes it builds relations with politicians, on describing the different tasks lobbies, journalists, scientists, vegan and projects I participated in and start-ups, celebrities (vegans and the experience I gained through this non-vegans). Among other things, amazing internship (3). PETA tries to inform politicians about 1. PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL difficult situations concerning non- human animals and incite them to TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA)’s PETA Switzerland, PETA Asia/Pacific PRESENTATION and PETA Australia. ‘People for the Ethical Treatment of PETA’s goal is ‘to uncover animal Animals ‘(PETA) was first founded in abuse, educate the public, and the USA in 1980 by Ingrid Newkirk encourage people to make lifestyle and Alex Pacheco. With more than changes so that animals can live 6.5 million members and supporters, their lives free from exploitation2’ PETA USA is now the largest animal .
    [Show full text]
  • WHEN PETA COMES to CAMPUS: a STUDY of ISSUES MANAGEMENT at a LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITY by MICHELLE HAMILTON Bachelor of Science In
    WHEN PETA COMES TO CAMPUS: A STUDY OF ISSUES MANAGEMENT AT A LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITY By MICHELLE HAMILTON Bachelor of Science in Animal Science Murray State University Murray, Kentucky 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 WHEN PETA COMES TO CAMPUS: A STUDY OF ISSUES MANAGEMENT AT A LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITY Thesis Approved: Dr. Traci L. Naile Thesis Adviser Dr. D. Dwayne Cartmell II Dr. Angel N. Riggs ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The pursuit of education has always been a top priority for me and with it the goal of a graduate degree. Here is to all of the people who made it possible: To my mother and father for instilling the insatiable appetite for education in me from an early age, for the courage to chase my dreams – no matter how far they take me from home, and for believing in me every step of the way. To Jackie, my sister and best friend, thank you for the encouragement to always follow my heart and be true to myself. McCauley, thank you for always looking at me through the rose-colored glasses only a baby sister has for a big sister. It’s that look that always reminds to be the best I can. To the AQHA Marketing gals, thanks for all the laughs when I was ready to meltdown in the midst of this adventure. C.J.B, thank you for going on late-night Diet Coke and ice cream runs and for not strangling me when I did have those meltdowns.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    PERSPECTIVES several organizations that were set up to SCIENCE AND SOCIETY continue the campaign. In both the United States and Europe, the debate about animal experimentation waned Animal experimentation: with the advent of the First World War, only to re-emerge during the 1970s, when anti- the continuing debate vivisection and animal-welfare organizations joined forces to campaign for new legislation to regulate animal research and testing. In the Mark Matfield United States, the public debate re-emerged in a more dramatic fashion in 1980, when an The use of animals in research and there was considerable protest from some activist infiltrated the laboratory of Dr Edward development has remained a subject of members of the audience and that, after one Taub of the Institute of Behavioural Research public debate for over a century. Although animal had been injected, an eminent med- at Silver Spring, Maryland (BOX 1). This attack there is good evidence from opinion surveys ical figure summoned the magistrates to on Taub’s research was organized by a tiny that the public accepts the use of animals in prevent the demonstration from continuing. animal-rights group called People for the research, they are poorly informed about the The Royal Society for the Prevention of Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which way in which it is regulated, and are Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) brought a pros- has since grown to dominate the campaign in increasingly concerned about laboratory- ecution for cruelty, and several of the doctors the United States. animal welfare. This article will review how present at the demonstration gave evidence public concerns about animal against Magnan, who returned to France to The anatomy of the campaign experimentation developed, the recent avoid answering the charges.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-04-20-Pawpac-Letter-Animal-Markets.Pdf
    April 20, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom, California State Governor 1303 10th Street, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Dr. Nadine Burke Harris, California Surgeon General California Health and Human Services 1600 Ninth Street, Room 460 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom and Dr. Burke Harris, We urge you to end the commercial wildlife 1 trade and sale for human consumption in California, including a ban on the import of nonnative birds, reptiles and amphibians. We also earnestly ask you to establish—with all the legal power vested in you—the rigorous enforcement of such bans and existing laws against the illegal trade of wild animals. With public health now teetering on the threat of the next pandemic, swift action is needed. _________________________________ 1 For this document, the term ‘wildlife’ means wild animals in the wild or bred in captivity. 2 The latest figures from Johns Hopkins University show that COVID-19 is responsible for 2.4 million cases and 165,000 deaths worldwide, including nearly 1,200 in California. Prohibitions and absolute strict enforcement against illegal wildlife trade and wildlife markets will help to prevent future zoonotic pandemics. We are grateful for your leadership in California and the nation during this crisis. We urge you now to put the prevention of future pandemics at the top of your priority list, even as you, your team and our state, city and county officials and industry professionals struggle in real time to save lives. Surgeon General Dr. Burke Harris and Governor Newsom, we ask you now to take swift action to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Species
    1 BETWEEN THE SPECIES Reflections on Tom Regan and the Animal Rights Movement That Once Was Gary L. Francione Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of Law and Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Scholar of Law and Philosophy Rutgers University School of Law New Jersey, U.S.A. Honorary Professor (Philosophy) School of Politics, Philosophy, and Language and Communication Studies University of East Anglia Norwich, U.K. Volume 21, Issue 1 Spring 2018 http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/ 2 Gary L. Francione The Beginning of a Real Rights Movement Let me set the scene: On July 15, 1985, a group of approxi- mately 100 animal rights activists, one of whom is Tom Regan, have taken over a building at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland. They are protesting head-injury experiments that are being conducted on baboons at the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania (Penn) Medical School. The protesters have announced that they will occupy the building unless and until the government agrees to at least suspend funding for the lab pending a full investigation. The government is threatening to arrest the protesters if they do not leave. As a large group of exhausted, unwashed, and nervous pro- testors crowded around him in rapt attention in a large but cramped NIH office, fearing their apparently inevitable arrest, Tom calmed and refocused them by recounting the history of nonviolent protest in various social movements and by reas- suring them about how such protest had been crucial to those struggles. Tom was a terrific storyteller, and his tales and his knowledge of social justice movements engaged and energized this group day after day for almost four days straight, helping the protestors regain their courage and understand how what they were doing was important, both as a matter of our opposi- tion to the experiments we were protesting and as part of our greater goal to achieve justice for nonhuman animals.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ought We to Live with Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singerâ•Žs Answer: Animal Liberation Part I
    BETWEEN THE SPECIES Issue IX August 2009 http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ How Ought We To Live With Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singer’s Answer: Animal Liberation Parts I & II (two papers) PART I Lesley McLean University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia Email address: [email protected] Between the Species, IX, August 2009, http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ Abstract In this paper and the next I discuss Peter Singer’s approach to answering the question of how one ought to live with nonhuman animals. In the first paper I situate Singer’s work within the larger historical context of moral concern for animals, looking at previous public consensus on the issue, its breakdown and its re-emergence with Singer in the 1970s. In the second paper, I take a closer look at Singer’s highly influential book, Animal Liberation (1975), and argue that as activist literature, his chapter on animal experimentation for example can be seen as morally persuasive in ways other than simply as an example of (the consequences) of speciesism. How I do this is to place Singer’s work side by side that of 19th century activist Francis Power Cobbe’s, in particular her pamphlet Light in Dark Places (1883), and examine their work against the criticisms from scientists defending the practice of animal experimentation. Between the Species, IX, August 2009, http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/ Peter Singer played a key role in bringing a particular moral problem to light; he came to name this problem in a now famous philosophical treatise. Animal Liberation was first published as a review essay in The New York Review of Books (NYRB) and two years later, in 1975, as a full-length book published by the New York Review.
    [Show full text]
  • One Person's Efforts
    ONE PERSON'S EFFORTS II\JGRID I\JEWKIRK People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals When I was fourteen, I was sitting in my dining room enjoying lW1ch when I saw an ox cart stop in front of the window. The ox, or to save enough money to go back to my beach­ bullock, was emaciated, weak, and exhausted. combing days on the Costa del Sol. He faltered W1der the heavy yoke of the cart, no longer able to move, despite the blows Living in an old Maryland river settle­ striking his back. As I watched, my heart in ment called "Seneca," my neighbors were a my mouth, the ox driver dismoW1ted, raised rowdy bW1ch who ate squirrel pie and occa­ the bullock I s tail, and thrust the driving sionally shot over the fence when they'd had stick--a heavy wooden pole~-deep into the one too many jiggers of rye. When the father animal's rectum. The bullock bellowed, stum­ of the family died, his brood moved to the bled, and collapsed. As I rushed out, big city, leaving behind an interesting col­ screaming at the driver to stop, I promised lection of auto parts and nineteen cats. myself that when I grew up I would come back to India to help animals escape such treat­ 'Ihe cats had long been in the habit of ment. dropping their litters in my Volkswagen bus, seeking shelter in my basement, and eating my Each winter I returned to New Delhi from cats' food, but such a large, permanent addi­ my boarding school in the snowcaps of the tion to my family of cats, chickens, dogs, Himalayas.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2016 Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement Elan L. Abrell Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1345 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SAVING ANIMALS: EVERYDAY PRACTICES OF CARE AND RESCUE IN THE US ANIMAL SANCTUARY MOVEMENT by ELAN LOUIS ABRELL A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 ELAN LOUIS ABRELL All Rights Reserved ii Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Jeff Maskovsky Chair of Examining Committee _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Gerald Creed Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Katherine Verdery Melissa Checker THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell Advisor: Jeff Maskovsky This multi-sited ethnography of the US animal sanctuary movement is based on 24 months of research at a range of animal rescue facilities, including a companion animal shelter in Texas, exotic animal sanctuaries in Florida and Hawaii, and a farm animal sanctuary in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • 52 REPORT REPORT Conference, Regional Regional Planning Planning Conference, for Co-Sponsored Co-Sponsored by by Action
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@CalPoly 52 E&A 111/2111/2 REPORT�REPORT campaign, and the effort to convince major food chains to pt'ovide alterna­ tive vegetarian options; a report by Regional Planning Conference,�Conference, Daryl Elliot on the current status of co-sponsored by Action for�for the ARM coalition; an account by Life, Animal Rights�Rights Sheila Schwartz of the humane educa­ Mobilization, and Animal�Animal tion task force's college outreach Rights Network�Network effort; a report by George P. Cave on March 12-14, 1982�1982 Trans-Species Unlimited's campaign to Washington, D.C.�D.C. ban the decompression chamber in Pennsylvania; an account by Lia Albo of the Fund for Animals' effort to halt The principal purpose of the rabbit clubbing in Idaho; an update Regional Planning Conference held by Ingrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco March 12-14 at George Washington of PETA on the status of seventeen University in Washington, D. C. was to monkeys removed last September from · give participants in the various task the Institute of Behavioral Research forces formed at the Action for Life under Maryland cruelty laws; and a Conference last July (see E&A 11/3) report by Holly Jensen of the effort and the Mobilization for Animal Rights to outlaw pound seizure in Florida. Conference last October (see E&A 11/4) the opportunity to get together The .conference also included a to discuss progress to date, compare "Personal Development and Public Per­ notes, and plan further strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF – JCAS Volume 13, Issue 1, December 2015
    Volume 13, Issue 1, 2015 Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X Journal for Critical Animal Studies Editorial Executive Board _____________________________________________________________________________ Interim Editor Dr. Sean Parson [email protected] Editorial Board For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Board please see the JCAS link on the Institute for Critical Animal Studies website: http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/?page_id=393 Cover Art Photograph from by John Lupinacci with permission. Volume 13, Issue 1, December 2015 i Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X JCAS Volume 13, Issue 1, October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Issue Introduction………………………………………………….………………………………...1-4 ESSAYS Animals within the Rousseauian Republic Parker Schill………………… ………………………………………………………………..6-32 Tensions between Multicultural Rights and the Rights of Domesticated and Liminal Animals: An Analysis of Will Kymlicka and Sue Donaldson’s Philosophy Luis Cordeiro-Rodrigues……………………………………………………….…………….33-65 Home is Where the Food Is: Barriers to Vegetarianism and Veganism in the Domestic Sphere Kathryn Asher and Elizabeth Cherry…………………………………………...…………….66-91 Challenging Sexism while Supporting Speciesism: The Views of Estonian Feminist on Animal Liberation and Its Links to Feminism Kadri Aavik and Dagmar Kase …………………………..…………………………………92-127 FILM REVIEWS Review: Interstellar (2014) Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues ………………………………….………………………………128-135 Review: This is Hope: Green Vegans and the New Human Ecology (2013) by Will Anderson
    [Show full text]
  • Join Us in Saving 55,000 Children and 600 Million Homeless Dogs, and Then Homeless Cats!
    Join us in saving 55,000 children and 600 million homeless dogs, and then homeless cats! Every 10 minutes: A child dies from rabies ... according to the World Health Organization. Every 10 minutes: 200 people suffer from painful rabies injections. Every 10 minutes: 11,000 homeless puppies are born. Every year 55,000 people, mostly children, die from rabies. Almost all are infected by stray dogs. Rabies is a painful way to die, involving convulsions so violent, that many infected children must be literally tied down by their hands and feet, and they are kept tied down ... until they die. Another disturbing fact: By the time any symptoms appear in humans, it’s too late, and death is guaranteed. Yes, you read that correctly: by the time symptoms appear, it is 100% fatal ... and there is no cure. So what can be done? Right now the primary action being taken is to: Kill the stray dogs ... or attempt to carry out the labor-intensive process of physically capturing each dog one at a time, and then manually vaccinating each dog one at a time. There are an estimated 600 million stray dogs worldwide, who give birth each year to an estimated one billion homeless puppies - who continue to reproduce uncontrolled, repeating the cycle. Many live in a constant state of hunger, and suffer from painful diseases which are never treated. Most die in pain before the age of three. We have a better way. Spay and Neuter Cookies are being developed to end this suffering. Once completed, a single edible Cookie will safely sterilize a stray - without surgery - and pave the way to ending the stray dog overpopulation problem, and preventing the deaths of the 55,000 children who currently die each year due to rabies from stray dogs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Research Controversy 1994 APPENDIX I 183
    APPENDIX I A. LISTING OF ANIMAL PROTECTION ORGANIZATIONS For the sake of brevity, the terms "animal rights," "animal welfare" and "animal protection" are used as follows. "Animal rights" refers to individuals or groups who have fundamental objections to both animal killing and animal suffering. "Animal welfare" refers to individuals or groups who have fundamental objections to causing animal suffering but who are prepared to accept the painless killing of animals for "necessary" human ends. "Animal protection" is a more general, collective term for all groups (including the two just described) inter­ ested in promoting the well being of animals. This is not a complete list of all animal protection groups, or even all that address animal research issues in some form. However, most of those that contribute to the public debate in a significant way are included. American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) Suite 204, Noble Plaza, 801 Old York Road, Jenkintown, PA 19046 (215/887-0816) 1992 budget - $988,000; assets - $5.8 million The AAVS was the first anti-vivisection (AV) society in the U.S. (fow1ded in 1883). It formed a loose partnership with the National and New England AV Societies in the J 970s and 1980s when all three became more active in the debate after a long period of relative dormancy (other than mailings to their own supporters). Under former executive director Bernard Unti (a historian and bibliophile), the organization started to develop more detailed (i.e. scientific) criticisms of animal research and contracted with Dr. Robert Sharpe, a British chemist and antivivisectionist, to prepare material for brochures and pamphlets.
    [Show full text]