DOCSLIB.ORG

Unclassified SAID/Nouakchott Vegetable Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unclassified SAID/Nouakchott Vegetable Production -------,----- Unclassified CLASSIFICATION PROJECT EVALUATION SUMMARY (PES) - PART I Report -----Symbol U-447 1. PROJECT TITLE 2. PROJECT NUMBER ~~ MISSION/AIDIW OFFICE 682-0204 SAID/Nouakchott 4. eVALUATION NUMBER (enter the number meintsl_ned ~Y the Vegetable Production reporting unit 8.g., Country or AIDIW Admlnlstrlltlve COde, Flsca' Veer, Serial No. beginning with No. 1 each FV) FY 81-01 ~ REGULAR EVALUATION o SPECIAL EVALUATION 5. KEY PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION OATES 6. ESTIMATED PROJECT 7. PERIOD COVERED BY EVAl.UATION FUNDING A. First B. Final Co Flnel From (month/yr.) 5/78 PRO.AG or Obligation Input A. Toul S2,720,000 Equivalent expected Delivery To (month/yr.) 4/81 B. u.s. $2,370,000 FY-1.B FYB..2... FY8...3- ~:~?~ t:valuetlon 23 'z\n1"'; 1 1 OR 1 8. ACTION DECISIONS APPROVEO BY MISSION OR AID/W OFFICE DIRECTOR A. Lla1: decilioneend/ex unrelolved lauel; cite thOU Itllml needing further study. 9. NAME OF C. OATE ACTION OFFiCeR (NOTE: MIllion dllcillona which antlci~ta A10/W or raglonal offIce IICtlon .hould TO BE ReSPONSIBLE I, COMpLETEO Jl)IICHy tYpe of document, a.a., al"llram, SPAR, PIO,whlch will PreNnt detailed requnt.) FOR ACTION Extend proJect by 19 months, l.e., through July, 1983, to obtain results from an additional grow­ ing season which will provide more data and empirical evidence required to draw conclusions, to reinforce the demonstration aspects of the project and to initiate steps for institutional­ ization. This decision will require that the following actions be taken: 1. Amend the Project Paper. USAIDi PDE 6/30/81 J. Amend the Project Agreement. and RD 10/21/82. 3. Amend the PIO/T. bivisions 11/~/81 4. Amend the contract for technical services AID/W Con- , -,, with Frederickson, Kamine and Associates. r-racting OffcJf 12/24/82. 5. Organize and begin implementation of ~IRM, USAID/RIl>, participant training program. ~ID/W and !7/81 '- 9/81 ~ontractor I ...~.. -,, 9. INVENTORV OF DOCUMENTS TO BE REVISED peR ABOVE DECISIONS 10. ALTERNATIVE DECISIONS ON FUi'':-',E OF PROJECT Implementation Plan G Project PIpe, C a.a., Cpl Network EJ Other (Specify) I A. 0 Continue Prolect Without Changf' ~ Assista~~.e[J Change Project Desi;n and/or Flnenciel Plan WPiOIT Technical ~ Contract Change ImplementatiOn Plan D t..o;lCal F ramllWork GJ pIO/C O Other (Specify) [i] Project Agreement W1'10/1' Discontinue Project 11. PROJECT OFFICER AND HOST COUNTRV OR OTHER RANKING PARTICIPANTS AS APPROPRIATE (Nem.. and Titl••) James Hughes, Project Manager, USAID Anthony Wirtz, Chief of Rural Dev. Div.,USAID Bruno Quebedoux, COP, Frederickson,Kamine & Ass A. La~ Hamadi, Director of Agriculture, GIRM Thlam Youssef, Chlef of Veg. Production, GI&~ 25 June 1981 AID 1330.15 (3-78) • -2- PES - PART II 13. Summary. Despite the delay in fielding a technical advisory team, the Vegetable Production project has been eval­ uated as being on target in its progress toward achieving the proposed purpose and outputs, with the exception of the parti­ cipant training and institutionalization aspect. Overall pros­ pects for achieving the project purpose and contributing to the sector goal are regarded as good~ In negotiating the final contract, only two year's funding for the three-year scope of work was provided. Inflation and underestimation of the original T.A. costs were factors in this situation. It is recommended that the project be extended by 19 months in order to achieve the full purpose of the project as envis­ ioned in the PP. This will require provision of additional funds to the contract to fully finance the three-year scope of service, plus additional advisory services not originally envisioned. This change will require a revision of the PP, submission of the PP to AID/W for approval, and amending the PIO/T and contract. ­ Further information on the relationship of project design to pro­ ject execution is contained in section B of the evaluation syn­ thesis which follows. 14. Evaluation Methodology. This evaluation was conducted to measure the progress of project activities against stated pur­ pose and outputs in the PP and to make appropriate recommenda­ tions on each aspect of implementation procedures. Data for the evaluation was collected from field visits to project sites . in the three regions of the country affected by the project. Additional information was obtained from documents and reports supplied by the contractor, USAID and the GIRM. The study design was based on PPC/E/PES guidelines for project evaluation and followed the outline of the evaluation synthesis which is attached. Key individuals contacted and a list of project sites visited are listed in Annex A. 15. External Factors. No major changes have occurred in the project setting since the initia~ project design was approved. Assumptions made at the time of project design were determined to still be valid. 16. Inputs. As originally designed, the project requires the financing of the third year of technical services to achieve its designed purpose. Additional tech services not envisioned in the original design are required as well, so that the full benefits of the project as designed may be realized. These inputs include the services of an additional agronomist/ horticulturalist (12 months - possibly to be supplied by Peace Corps), and a water management specialist (12 months). -3- Related increases in the quantity of commodities available to the project will also be required (see Section D of the Evaluation Synthesis). 17. Outputs. Four major outputs were designed: (1) data collection to test the feasibility of vegetable production, (2) establishment of pilot demonstration and field trial areas to carry out agronomic research, (3) analysis of the nutritional impact of proj ect interventions and the training of loc:~l popu­ lations in vegetable preparation, and (4) training of GI~~ personnel in vegetable production technologies. Assessment indicates that satisfactory progress is being made in the pro­ duction of all outputs with the exception of the training com­ ponent. Despite the noted progress, analysis also indicates that the objective of training 3,000 families in food preparation techniques is overly ambitions, given the allotted technical assistance. It is recommended that this output be scaled down to 1,500 families. 18. Puryose. "To determine the feasibility of expanded vegetable product~on among sedentary rural groups in the 3rd, 5th and 6th regions of Mauritania through an applied research and vegetable crop demonstration program". EOPS conditions include: (1) a body of data collected and analyzed concerning vegetable production in Mauritania, (2) 3,000 farmers instructed in improved production, seed preservation and marketing methods, (3) 3,000 families trained in optimum food preparation techniques. The development of research methodologies. is regarded as well advanced. These methodologies are now being utlized to begin the process of collecting the required agronomic, nutritional and economic data. At least 600 farm families are participating di­ rectly in vegetable garden demonstration activities, although a considerably fewer number, between 200 and 300, have been involved in food preparation demonstrations. Informal on-the-job training has taken place for some nine host country participants, but little progress has been made in the preparation of formal trai­ ning programs for the participants. The EOPS conditions are still regarded as good indicators of the status which the proj ec." will achieve at its completion (with the exception of the pre­ viously discussed food preparation demonstration) provided that a third year of contract technical assistance is supplied to th2 project. 19. Goal. "To promote the development and welfare of the rura}" population in Mauritania by increasing small farmer income, fooe productivity and contributing to family food security." Proper analysis of progress toward this goal will require further data collection in the field, which is now in progress. -4- 20. Beneficiaries. It is expected that with a four-year technical assistance effort, this project is capable of reaching 3,000 small farm families who may benefit from improved nutrition, a reduction in underemploYment and an increase in income. Since this project is research oriented, these potential benefits remain hypothetical and will be verified by analyzing data col­ lected over the life of the project by the contract technical assistance team and associated Peace Corps Volunteers. 21. Unplanned Effects. Project activities have had the effect of stimulating production of vegetables to a greater degree than had been anticipated. In many areas, demonstration plots have promoted the development of satellite garden areas not directly under the tutelage of the project. This outcome is regarded as nutritionally and economically beneficial to the local populatior­ involved. However, the long-term viability of this production activity has not yet been thoroughly analyzed. 22. Lessons Learned. The evidence collected for this evaluation indicates that the project is moving toward the achievement of its designed purpose. Howeyer, the inability to synchronize the 1 arrival of key inputs (Peace Corps Volunteers, technical assista~ce i team and commodities) created a situation which ultimately incre­ ased costs and led to misunderstandings between various groups i::..·­ 1 volved in project implementation. Most of the delay was beyond 1 the direct control of project management (discussion with the 1 host country government regarding the rights and privileges of Americans working in Mauritania retarded contract execution for many months). It is apparent, however, that the ultimate interests of the project would have been served by attempting to reschedule the entire implementation effort until all parties were capable of arriving simultaneously in Mauritania. This situation is discussed further in Section B of the evaluation synthesis. ---~..-._--- ~_.- -------_._-~------ -5- EVALUATION SYNTHESIS A. ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN PROJECT SETTING 1. Economic Situation and Governmental Priorities During the years 1970-1978, encompassing the period of project design in 1976, the Mauritanian economy was stagnant, having experienced less than 2% real growth since 1970.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project: Rosso Bridge Construction Project Country: Multinational Senegal-Mauritania Summary of the Full Resettlement Plan (Frp)
    Rosso Bridge Construction Project FRP SUMMARY AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT: ROSSO BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COUNTRY: MULTINATIONAL SENEGAL-MAURITANIA SUMMARY OF THE FULL RESETTLEMENT PLAN (FRP) Project Team A.I. MOHAMED, Principal Transport Economist, OITC.1/SNFO M. A. WADE, Infrastructure Expert, OITC/SNFO P-M. NDONG, Transport Engineer, OITC.2 / MAFO L. EHOUMAN, Principal Socio-Economist, OITC.1 L.C. KINANE, Principal Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Project S. BAIOD, Consultant Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Team Sector Director A. OUMAROU Regional Director: A. BERNOUSSI Resident Representative: M. NDONGO Division Manager: J.K. KABANGUKA 1 Rosso Bridge Construction Project FRP SUMMARY Project Title : ROSSO BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Country : MULTINATIONAL SENEGAL-MAURITANIA Project Number : P-Z1-D00-020 Department : OITC Division: OITC.1 INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the Full Resettlement Plan (FRP). In accordance with the national procedures of Senegal and Mauritania and those of the Bank, a full resettlement plan was developed. This FRP covers the compensation and resettlement of project-affected persons (PAPs). Its objectives are to: (i) limit involuntary displacement to the extent possible; (ii) reduce property destruction to the extent possible; and (iii) compensate PAPs for the loss of homes, farms, built-up structures and facilities, and income. 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT LOCATION 1.1 Project Description The construction of a bridge over the Senegal River in Rosso and the implementation of transport facilitation measures will provide a permanent crossing facility over the river, and play a decisive role in developing the interconnection of regional road networks. It will be an important link that promotes integration and trade development between the countries of the Arab Maghreb Union, West Africa and probably beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Assessment of Meteorological Drought by Different Methods in Trarza Region, Mauritania
    Water Resour Manage (2017) 31:825–845 DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1510-8 Evaluation and Assessment of Meteorological Drought by Different Methods in Trarza Region, Mauritania Ely Yacoub1 & Gokmen Tayfur1 Received: 6 June 2016 /Accepted: 20 September 2016 / Published online: 10 October 2016 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract Drought Indexes (DIs) are commonly used for assessing the effect of drought such as the duration and severity. In this study, long term precipitation records (monthly recorded for 44 years) in three stations (Boutilimit (station 1), Nouakchott (station 2), and Rosso (station 3)) are employed to investigate the drought characteristics in Trarza region in Mauritania. Six DI methods, namely normal Standardized Precipitation Index (normal-SPI), log normal Standardized Precipitation Index (log-SPI), Standardized Precipitation Index using Gamma distribution (Gamma-SPI), Percent of Normal (PN), the China-Z index (CZI), and Deciles are used for this purpose. The DI methods are based on 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12 month time periods. The results showed that DIs produce almost the same results for the Trarza region. The droughts are detected in the seventies and eighties more than the 1990s. Twelve drought years might be experienced in station 2 and six in stations 1 and 3 in every 44 years, according to reoccurrence probability of the gamma-SPI and log-SPI results. Stations 1 and 3 might experience fewer drought years than station 2, which is located right on the coast. In station 1, which is located inland, when the annual rainfall is less than 123 mm, it is likely that severe drought would occur.
    [Show full text]
  • African Development Bank Group Project : Mauritania
    Language: English Original: French AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT : MAURITANIA – AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION SUPPORT PROJECT (PATAM) COUNTRY : ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF MAURITANIA PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Main Report Date: November 2018 Team Leader: Rafâa MAROUKI, Chief Agro-economist, RDGN.2 Team Members: Driss KHIATI, Agricultural Sector Specialist, COMA Beya BCHIR, Environmentalist, RDGN.3 Sarra ACHEK, Financial Management Specialist, SNFI.2 Saida BENCHOUK, Procurement Specialist, SNFI.1-CODZ Elsa LE GROUMELLEC, Principal Legal Officer, PGCL.1 Amel HAMZA, Gender Specialist, RDGN.3 Ibrahima DIALLO, Disbursements Expert, FIFC.3 Project Selima GHARBI, Disbursements Officer, RDGN/FIFC.3 Team Hamadi LAM, Agronomist (Consultant), AHAI Director General: Mohamed EL AZIZI, RDGN Deputy Director General: Ms Yacine FAL, RDGN Sector Director: Martin FREGENE, AHAI Division Manager: Vincent CASTEL, RDGN.2 Division Manager: Edward MABAYA, AHAI.1 Khaled LAAJILI, Principal Agricultural Economist, RDGC; Aminata SOW, Rural Peer Engineering Specialist, RDGW.2; Laouali GARBA, Chief Climate Change Specialist, Review: AHAI.2; Osama BEN ABDELKARIM, Socio-economist, RDGN.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS Equivalents, Fiscal Year, Weights and Measures, Acronyms and Abbreviations, Project Information Sheet, Executive Summary, Project Matrix ……….…………………...………..……... i - v I – Strategic Thrust and Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Linkage with Country Strategy and
    [Show full text]
  • It. S.A.I.D./O.M.V.S. Integrated Development Project Project No
    IT. S.A.I.D./O.M.V.S. INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. 6M-0621 VOLUME III SECTION 3.3. ANALYSIS OF THE IDP TRAINING COMPONENT USAID/RBDO OCTOBER 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3.3. ANALYSIS OF THE IDP TRAINING COMPONENT 3.3.1. Objectives ............................ 1 3.3.1.1. General Objectives ..... ..................I... 1 3.3.1.2. Specific Objectives ...... .. ................ 2 3.3.1.2.1. Long-term Objectives 2.........2 3.3.1.2.2. Short-term Objectives .... ......... 2 3.3.2. Perceived Problems ...... .... ..................... 3 3.3.2.1. Farmer Training ..... .... ................. 3 3.3.2.2. Common Institutional and Implementation Problems 3 3.3.3. Overview of the Proposed IDP Training Strategies ... ....... 4 3.3.3.1. Introduction ...... ..... .................. 4 3.3.3.2. Strategy at the Village Level ..... ........... 6 3.3.3.2.1. The Farmers' Associations 6.......6 3.3.3.2.2. The Farmers ..... .. .............. 7 3.3.3.3. Strategy at the RDA Level ...... ............. 8 3.3.4. Organization of Training at the RDA's Level: Training 9 and Monitoring Personnel 3.3.4.1. Training Personnel: Role and Functions of the 9 TA Staff 3.3.4.2. Training of the RDA Extension Personnel ......... 10 3.3.4.2.1. Need for Training .......... 10 3.3.4.2.2. Personnel: Categories and Type of 11 Training Needed 3.3.4.2.3. Contents, Methodology and Sources Needed 12 3.3.4.3. The Mobile Training Unit (fTU) .. .......... ... 16 3.3.4.3.1. Organization cf the MTU ........ 16 3.3,4.3.2. Tasks of the fU ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalization of Research in West and Central Africa a Synthesis of Workshop Findings and Recommendations
    SD Publication Series Office of Sustainable Development Bureau for Africa Regionalization of Research in West and Central Africa A Synthesis of Workshop Findings and Recommendations Banjul, The Gambia March 14–16, 1994 Technical Paper No.4 November 1994 Regionalization of Research in West and Central Africa A Synthesis of Workshop Findings and Recommendations Banjul, The Gambia March 14–16, 1994 Publication services provided by AMEX International, Inc. pursuant to the following USAID contract: Project Title: Policy, Analysis, Research, and Technical Support Project Project Number: 698-0478 Contract Number: AOT-0478-C-00-3168-00 CORAF Conférence des Responsables Special Program for African U.S. Agency for International de Recherche Agronomique Agricultural Research Development Africaine Bureau for Africa i ii Contents Foreword v Executive Summary vi Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations ix 1. Introduction 1 A. The Workshop 1 B. Objectives 1 2. Background 2 A. Regionalization of Research 2 B. The Framework for Action for the Humid and Sub Humid Zones of Central 3 and Western Africa C. Coordination of Regional Research Programs 3 D. Impacts from Agricultural Research 4 E. Future Challenges: Trade and Technology 5 3. Recommendations 6 A. Governance and Coordination 6 B. Institutional Mechanisms to Fund and Implement Programs 6 C. Strategic Planning and Priority Setting 7 D. Technical Forum and Information Exchange 7 4. Follow-up Actions 9 Annexes A. List of Documents/Liste des Documents 10 B. List of Participants/Liste des Participants 13 C. Agenda 24 D. Regional Programs Synopsis 30 iii iv Foreword In Africa and within the international commu- tional, regional, and international activities in nity, a shared vision of an Africa on the path to West and Central Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritania 20°0'0"N Mali 20°0'0"N Akjoujt ! U479 ATLANTIC OCEAN U Uu435
    ! ! 20°0'0"W 15°0'0"W 10°0'0"W 5°0'0"W Laayoune / El Aaiun .! !(Smara ! ! Cabo Bu Craa Bojador!( Western Sahara 25°0'0"N ! 25°0'0"N Guelta Zemmur Distances shown in the table and the map are indicative. They have been calculated following the shortest route on main roads. Tracks have not been considered as a main road. Ad Dakhla (! Tiris Zemmour Algeria !( Zouerate ! Bir Gandus Nouadhibou Adrar !( Dakhlet Nouadhibou Uad Guenifa (! ! Atar Chinguetti Inchiri Mauritania 20°0'0"N Mali 20°0'0"N Akjoujt ! u479 ATLANTIC OCEAN u uu435 Tagant Tidjikja ! Nouakchott uu9 Hodh Ech Chargui (! Nbeika Nouakchott Trarza ! uu157 Boutilimit Magta` Lahjar uu202 ! ! uu346 uu101 Aleg ! Mal (! ! u165 Brakna u !Guerou Bourem uu6 Bogue Kiffa 'Ayoun el 'Atrous Nema Tombouctou! uu66 Rosso ! (! Assaba (! 210 (! (! uu 276 (!!( Tekane ! uu Goundam ! Richard-Toll !uu107 Lekseiba Timbedgha Gao Bababe ! Tintane ! !( ! Hodh El Gharbi ( uu116 !Mbout !( Kaedi uu188 Bassikounou Saint-Louis uu183 Bou Gadoum !( Gorgol (! Guidimaka !Hamoud !(Louga uu107 Bousteile! !( Kersani 'Adel Bagrou Tanal ! ! Niminiama (! Nioro Nara 15°0'0"N Thies Touba Gouraye Diadji ! 15°0'0"N Senegal ! Selibabi du Sahel Sandigui Burkina (! !( Douentza !( ! Sandare !( Mbake Khabou Guidimaka Salmossi Dakar .!Rufisque Faso 20°0'0"W Diourbel 15°0'0"W 10°0'0"W 5°0'0"W !( !( !( Mopti Bandiagara ! Sikire Gorom-Gorom Mbour Kayes Niono! !( Linking Roads Road Network Date Created: ! 05 - DEC -2012 ! (! Reference Town National Boundar!y Map Num: LogCluster-MRT-007-A2 ! Primary Road ! Coord.System/Datum: Geographic/WGS84
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritania 20°0'0"N Mali 20°0'0"N
    !ho o Õ o !ho !h h !o ! o! o 20°0'0"W 15°0'0"W 10°0'0"W 5°0'0"W 0°0'0" Laayoune / El Aaiun HASSAN I LAAYOUNE !h.!(!o SMARAÕ !(Smara !o ! Cabo Bu Craa Algeria Bojador!( o Western Sahara BIR MOGHREIN 25°0'0"N ! 25°0'0"N Guelta Zemmur Ad Dakhla h (!o DAKHLA Tiris Zemmour DAJLA !(! ZOUERAT o o!( FDERIK AIRPORT Zouerate ! Bir Gandus o Nouadhibou NOUADHIBOU (!!o Adrar ! ( Dakhlet Nouadhibou Uad Guenifa !h NOUADHIBOU ! Atar (!o ! ATAR Chinguetti Inchiri Mauritania 20°0'0"N Mali 20°0'0"N AKJOUJT o ! ATLANTIC OCEAN Akjoujt Tagant TIDJIKJA ! o o o Tidjikja TICHITT Nouakchott Nouakchott Hodh Ech Chargui (!o NOUAKCHOTT Nbeika !h.! Trarza ! ! NOUAKCHOTT MOUDJERIA o Moudjeria o !Boutilimit BOUTILIMIT ! Magta` Lahjar o Mal ! TAMCHAKETT Aleg! ! Brakna AIOUN EL ATROUSS !Guerou Bourem PODOR AIRPORTo NEMA Tombouctou! o ABBAYE 'Ayoun el 'Atrous TOMBOUCTOU Kiffa o! (!o o Rosso ! !( !( ! !( o Assaba o KIFFA Nema !( Tekane Bogue Bababe o ! o Goundam! ! Timbedgha Gao Richard-Toll RICHARD TOLL KAEDI o ! Tintane ! DAHARA GOUNDAM !( SAINT LOUIS o!( Lekseiba Hodh El Gharbi TIMBEDRA (!o Mbout o !( Gorgol ! NIAFUNKE o Kaedi ! Kankossa Bassikounou KOROGOUSSOU Saint-Louis o Bou Gadoum !( ! o Guidimaka !( !Hamoud BASSIKOUNOU ! Bousteile! Louga OURO SOGUI AIRPORT o ! DODJI o Maghama Ould !( Kersani ! Yenje ! o 'Adel Bagrou Tanal o !o NIORO DU SAHEL SELIBABY YELIMANE ! NARA Niminiama! o! o ! Nioro 15°0'0"N Nara ! 15°0'0"N Selibabi Diadji ! DOUTENZA LEOPOLD SEDAR SENGHOR INTL Thies Touba Senegal Gouraye! du Sahel Sandigui (! Douentza Burkina (! !( o ! (!o !( Mbake Sandare!
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Arrêté N°R2089/06/MIPT/DGCL/ Du 24 Août 2006 Fixant Le Nombre De Conseillers Au Niveau De Chaque Commune
    2. Arrêté n°R2089/06/MIPT/DGCL/ du 24 août 2006 fixant le nombre de conseillers au niveau de chaque commune Article Premier: Le nombre de conseillers municipaux des deux cent seize (216) Communes de Mauritanie est fixé conformément aux indications du tableau en annexe. Article 2 : Sont abrogées toutes dispositions antérieures contraires, notamment celles relatives à l’arrêté n° 1011 du 06 Septembre 1990 fixant le nombre des conseillers des communes. Article 3 : Les Walis et les Hakems sont chargés, chacun en ce qui le concerne, de l’exécution du présent arrêté qui sera publié au Journal Officiel. Annexe N° dénomination nombre de conseillers H.Chargui 101 Nema 10101 Nema 19 10102 Achemim 15 10103 Jreif 15 10104 Bangou 17 10105 Hassi Atile 17 10106 Oum Avnadech 19 10107 Mabrouk 15 10108 Beribavat 15 10109 Noual 11 10110 Agoueinit 17 102 Amourj 10201 Amourj 17 10202 Adel Bagrou 21 10203 Bougadoum 21 103 Bassiknou 10301 Bassiknou 17 10302 El Megve 17 10303 Fassala - Nere 19 10304 Dhar 17 104 Djigueni 10401 Djiguenni 19 10402 MBROUK 2 17 10403 Feireni 17 10404 Beneamane 15 10405 Aoueinat Zbel 17 10406 Ghlig Ehel Boye 15 Recueil des Textes 2017/DGCT avec l’appui de la Coopération française 81 10407 Ksar El Barka 17 105 Timbedra 10501 Timbedra 19 10502 Twil 19 10503 Koumbi Saleh 17 10504 Bousteila 19 10505 Hassi M'Hadi 19 106 Oualata 10601 Oualata 19 2 H.Gharbi 201 Aioun 20101 Aioun 19 20102 Oum Lahyadh 17 20103 Doueirare 17 20104 Ten Hemad 11 20105 N'saveni 17 20106 Beneamane 15 20107 Egjert 17 202 Tamchekett 20201 Tamchekett 11 20202 Radhi
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritania MODERATE ADVANCEMENT
    Mauritania MODERATE ADVANCEMENT In 2015, Mauritania made a moderate advancement in efforts to eliminate the worst forms of child labor. The Government amended the Anti-Slavery Law to increase the penalties for slavery offenses and criminalize other slavery-like practices, including debt bondage. The Government also adopted the National Action Plan to Eliminate Child Labor, which aims to strengthen child labor laws and mobilize funds for social programs to withdraw children from child labor. In addition, the Government funded and participated in multiple programs that include the goal of eliminating or preventing child labor, including its worst forms. However, children in Mauritania are engaged in child labor, including in herding cattle and goats, and in the worst forms of child labor, including in indentured and hereditary slavery. Mauritania’s legal framework does not prohibit hazardous occupations and activities in all relevant child labor sectors, including agriculture; it also does not prohibit children from being used, procured, or offered for the production and trafficking of drugs. Limited resources for the systematic enforcement of child labor laws impede government efforts to protect children from the worst forms of child labor. Additionally, the Government continued to imprison anti-slavery protestors. I. PREVALENCE AND SECTORAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD LABOR Children in Mauritania are engaged in child labor, including in agriculture and particularly in herding cattle and goats.(1-6) Children are also engaged in the worst forms of child labor, including in indentured and hereditary slavery.(5-11) Table 1 provides key indicators on children’s work and education in Mauritania. Table 1. Statistics on Children’s Work and Education Children Age Percent Working (% and population) 5-14 yrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritania 2020 OSAC Crime & Safety Report
    Mauritania 2020 OSAC Crime & Safety Report This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Embassy in Nouakchott. OSAC encourages travelers to use this report to gain baseline knowledge of security conditions in Mauritania. For more in-depth information, review OSAC’s Mauritania country page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. Travel Advisory The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Mauritania at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution in Mauritania due to crime and terrorism. Do not travel to areas designated as off limits by the Mauritanian military due to crime and terrorism. Review OSAC’s report, Understanding the Consular Travel Advisory System. Overall Crime and Safety Situation Crime Threats The U.S. Department of State has assessed Nouakchott as being a CRITICAL-threat location for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests. The Mauritanian government reports an increase in violent (e.g. murder, assault, battery, robbery, occupied burglary, kidnapping, carjacking) and non-violent (e.g. theft, vehicle burglary, vandalism, unoccupied burglary) crimes since 2015, all of which predominately affects Mauritanians; criminals tend to not target Westerners specifically, although U.S. nationals and other western expatriates have been the victim of crime in Nouakchott in recent years, including robbery and sexual assault. Criminal gangs are active in the main cities. The Mauritanian government has taken small measures to mitigate crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Etudes Techniques Du Reseau Cible
    ETUDES TECHNIQUES DU RESEAU CIBLE Mauritanie: Plan directeur de production et transport de l'énergie électrique en Mauritanie entre 2011 et 2030 - Rapport final Table des Matières Page 7. Etude technique du réseau cible 1 7.1 Contexte 1 7.2 Objectifs 1 7.3 Contexte actuel, contexte engagé (moyen terme) du système de transport et choix techniques en vigueur 1 7.3.1 Objectifs et critères d’analyse 1 7.3.1.1 Objectifs 1 7.3.1.2 Critères 2 7.3.2 Analyse de la situation existante 2 7.3.2.1 Lignes 3 7.3.2.2 Calculs de répartition à la pointe de charge 6 7.3.2.3 Calculs de court-circuit 9 7.3.2.4 Calculs de stabilité transitoire 10 7.3.2.5 Situation au creux de charge 14 7.3.2.6 Conclusion 15 7.4 Projets annoncés (projets SOMELEC et OMVS) 15 7.4.1 Projets supposés engagés 15 7.4.1.1 Projets d’extension de réseau 15 7.4.1.2 Projets de production d’électricité 16 7.4.2 Projets moins certains 16 7.5 Rappels du contexte futur: Prévisions de la demande et plan de production long terme 17 7.5.1 Prévisions de la demande 17 7.5.1.1 Charge des localités des Réseaux Autonomes (RA ou "Réseaux Araignées") 17 7.5.1.2 Charge des localités du Réseau Interconnecté (RI) 18 7.5.1.3 Charge de Nouakchott et Nouadhibou 18 7.5.2 Année de raccordement des autres grandes localités 19 7.5.3 Plan de production 19 7.6 Projets "Plan Directeur" : calculs de répartition 20 7.6.1 Variantes envisageables 20 7.6.2 Plan de tension et compensation de la puissance réactive 22 7.6.3 Niveau de charge des lignes et transformateurs 25 7.6.4 Pertes à la pointe en 2030 25 7.6.5 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Desert Locust Bulletin 192 (English)
    page 1 / 7 FAO EMERGENCY CENTRE FOR LOCUST OPERATIONS DESERT LOCUST BULLETIN No. 192 GENERAL SITUATION DURING AUGUST 1994 FORECAST UNTIL MID-OCTOBER 1994 No significant Desert Locust populations have been reported during August and the overall situation whilst still requiring vigilance, appears calm, with no major chance to develop during the forecast period. In West Africa, only scattered adults and hoppers were reported limited primarily to southern Mauritania. This would indicate that swarms from northern Mauritania dispersed earlier in the year before the onset of the rainy season and, as a result, breeding in the south was limited. No other significant locust activity has been reported from Mali, Niger and Chad. In South- West Asia, a few patches of hoppers have been treated in Rajasthan over a small area, and low density adults persisting in several locations of the summer breeding areas of India and Pakistan are likely to continue to breed; however, no major developments are expected during the forecast period. A few mature adults have been reported in the extreme south-eastern desert of Egypt and some isolated adults were present on the northern coastal plains of Somalia in late July. No locusts were reported from Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen or Oman. Conditions were reported as dry in Algeria and no locust activity was reported; a similar situation is expected to prevail in Morocco. Although the overall situation does not appear to be critical and may decline in the next few months, FAO recommends continued monitoring in the summer breeding areas. The FAO Desert Locust Bulletin is issued monthly, supplemented by Updates during periods of increased Desert Locust activity, and is distributed by fax, telex, e-mail, FAO pouch and airmail by the Emergency Centre for Locust Operations, AGP Division, FAO, 00100 Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]