DOCSLIB.ORG

Forge River Watershed Sewer Project Environmental Assessment Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forge River Watershed Sewer Project Environmental Assessment Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County, New York Forge River Watershed Sewer Project Environmental Assessment Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County, New York FEMA-DR-4085-NY October 2018 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278 Environmental Assessment Forge River Watershed Sewer Project, Town of Brookhaven, NY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 SUFFOLK COUNTY COASTAL RESILIENCY INITIATIVE ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 FORGE RIVER WATERSHED SEWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS .............................................................. 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ....................................................................................................... 2 3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 2 4.0 ALTERNATIVES................................................................................................................ 4 4.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: NO ACTION .................................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 ALTERNATIVE 2: PROPOSED ACTION: MASTIC-SHIRLEY SEWER DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT .................................................. 4 4.2.1 Combination of Gravity and Low-Pressure Sewers Collection System ................................................... 4 4.2.2 Exclusively Low-Pressure Sewers Collection System .............................................................................. 6 4.2.3 Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility............................................................................................. 6 4.2.4 Implementation and Construction ......................................................................................................... 6 4.3 ALTERNATIVE 3: ON-SITE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL—REPLACING EXISTING ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS WITH INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (I/A OWTS ALTERNATIVE) ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.3.1 Treatment Methods ............................................................................................................................... 7 4.3.2 Implementation and Construction ......................................................................................................... 7 4.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT DISMISSED .............................................................................................................. 8 4.4.1 Centralized System with Different Wastewater Treatment Technology ................................................ 8 4.4.2 Centralized System with Different Collection System Infrastructure ..................................................... 8 4.4.3 Centralized System with Alternative Location(s) for the AWTF ............................................................. 8 4.5 SUMMARY EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................ 9 5.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ........................................ 9 5.1 RESOURCE TOPICS DISMISSED FROM DETAILED ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 10 5.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS ..................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 10 5.2.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 11 5.3 AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GASES .................................................................................................................. 12 5.3.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 12 5.3.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 13 5.4 WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................................................ 16 5.4.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 16 5.4.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 19 5.5 WETLANDS AND COASTAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 21 5.5.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 21 5.5.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 23 5.6 FLOODPLAINS, STORMS, AND SEA LEVEL RISE .......................................................................................................... 25 5.6.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 25 5.6.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 26 5.7 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 5.7.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 28 5.7.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 29 i Environmental Assessment Forge River Watershed Sewer Project, Town of Brookhaven, NY 5.8 WILDLIFE AND FISH ............................................................................................................................................. 31 5.8.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 31 5.8.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 33 5.9 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITATS ............................................................................... 36 5.9.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 36 5.9.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 39 5.10 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................ 41 5.10.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 41 5.10.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 44 5.11 AESTHETIC RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................ 45 5.11.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 45 5.11.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 46 5.12 LAND USE AND PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 47 5.12.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 47 5.12.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 49 5.13 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE .................................................................................................................................... 51 5.13.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 51 5.13.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ........................................................................................ 54 5.14 NOISE .............................................................................................................................................................. 55 5.14.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 55 5.14.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. Appendix D
    Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York February 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County, NY New York District APPENDIX D APPENDIX D Duck Farm Industry and Impacts Report prepared by Suffolk County Department of Planning H. Lee Dennison Building - 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, New York 11788 DeWitt S. Davies, Ph.D. Chief Environmental Analyst Duck Farm Industry Impacts on the Environment Introduction As documented in the historical overview section, the duck farm industry in Suffolk County was an extremely intensive land use along stream and bay shorelines. Inventory work by the Department of Planning indicates that approximately 2,000 acres of upland property and almost 20 miles of shoreline along freshwater creeks/rivers and estuary tributaries – primarily in the Towns of Brookhaven, Riverhead and Southampton – were utilized during the last century in Suffolk County for duck production. The impacts of duck farming were dramatic, both on-site and off-site. Extensive landform alterations were made to construct animal pens, feed lots and swim ponds, which were often located in or directly adjacent to streams/coves of the bays. Waste effluent discharges from the farms created thick organic matter deposits, degraded water quality and altered phytoplankton and benthic population in near-by surface waters. Duck Farms – An Intensive Land Use The significance of the impacts is reflected by the magnitude of the industry and the waste load generated. Effluent waste loadings from the farms in the form of suspended solids, nutrients and coliform bacteria were huge, especially prior to the required use of treatment technology under water pollution control laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Tallmadge Trail Guide.P65
    Suffolk County Council, BSA The Benjamin Tallmadge Historic Trail Suffolk County Council, BSA Brookhaven, New York The starting point of this Trail is the Town of Brookhaven parking lot at Cedar Beach just off Harbor Beach Road in Mount Sinai, NY. Hikers can be safely dropped off at this loca- tion. 90% of this trail follows Town roadways which closely approximate the original route that Benjamin Tallmadge and his contingent of Light Dragoons took from Mount Sinai to the Manor of St. George in Mastic. Extreme CAUTION needs to be observed on certain heavily traveled roads. Some Town roads have little or no shoulders at all. Most roads do not have sidewalks. Scouts should hike in a single line fashion facing the oncoming traffic. They should be dressed in their Field Uniforms or brightly colored Class “B” shirt. This Trail should only be hiked in the daytime hours. Since this 21 mile long Trail is designed to be hiked over a two day period, certain pre- arrangements must be made. The overnight camping stay can be done at Cathedral Pines County Park in Middle Island. Applications must be obtained and submitted to the Suffolk County Parks Department. On Day 2, the trail veers off Smith Road in Shirley onto a ser- vice access road inside the Wertheim National Wildlife Refuge for about a mile before returning to the neighborhood roads. As a courtesy, the Wertheim Refuge would like a letter three weeks in advance informing them that you will be hiking on their property. There are no water sources along this hike so make sure you pack enough.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of ENACTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board Of
    NOTICE OF ENACTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Trustees of the Village of East Hampton, on January 15, 2021 adopted Introductory #7-2020 as LOCAL LAW TWO of 2021, hereby amending the Code of the Village of East Hampton, Chapter 267; Vehicles & Traffic - §267-4 (Parking prohibited in designated locations), §267-7 (Parking time limited in designated locations) and § 267-11 (U-turns and left turns prohibited in designated locations) to address a number of parking and safety concerns within the Village. BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Trustees of the Village of East Hampton as follows: SECTION I. Purpose. The Board of Trustees have determined a need to address a number of parking concerns within the Village. Some areas that restrict parking to a certain time period should be extended or shortened. Also, in order to address certain safety concerns brought forth by the Village Police Chief, the Board of Trustees feel its necessary to create some new “no parking zones” along with addressing the “no left turn” provisions when emerging from Pleasant Lane onto Newtown Lane. SECTION II. The provisions of Chapter 267 of the Code of the Village of East Hampton are hereby amended as follows (added material is underlined & highlighted): LOCAL LAW # TWO – 2021 (INTRO. #7-2020) § 267-4 Parking prohibited in designated locations. A. The parking of vehicles in any of the following locations is hereby prohibited: (1) through (77) NO CHANGE (78) On both sides of Middle Lane from the intersection of Cross Highway to the intersection of Egypt Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Self Contained Appraisal Report Prepared
    SELF CONTAINED APPRAISAL REPORT BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK - TOBACCO WAREHOUSE (CONVERSION PROPERTY) Part of 51 Water Street N/E/C Water Street & New Dock Street Brooklyn, New York BLOCK 26, PART OF LOT 1 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Charles R. Kamps Executive Director NYC Department of Citywide Administrative Services 1CentreStreet, 20th Floor North New York, NY 10007 PREPARED BY: Mr. Matthew J. Guzowski - Principal, Ms. Kathleen Rairden – Senior Vice President Ms. Tonia Vailas – Senior Vice President Goodman-Marks Associates, Inc. 420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 456 New York, NY 10017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Certificate of Appraisal ....................................................................................................5 Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions ....................................................................7 Appraisal Definitions .......................................................................................................9 Hypothetical Conditions, Extraordinary Assumptions, Limiting Conditions & Jurisdictional Exception..............................................................................................12 Valuation Date/Purpose, Intended Use & Users of the Appraisal/Subject Property Identification & Ownership History..............................................................................14 Survey of Subject Property...........................................................................................16 Site Map of Brooklyn Bridge Park................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Forge River, Problem Identification
    The Forge River, Problem Identification A report prepared for the Town of Brookhaven Long Island, New York by R.L. Swanson, B. Brownawell, and C. O’Connell School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Stony Brook University September 2009 The Forge River, Problem Identification The Problem The Forge River is a small, partially mixed estuary discharging into Moriches Bay, a part of the Long Island south shore lagoonal system. The tidal portion of the river is 4 K (3.2 nautical mile) long that ends abruptly at Montauk Highway which serves as a dam. Two freshwater ponds (East Pond and West Pond) continuously discharge to the tidal Forge at this location. The surface watershed of the river is 43.06 km2 (10.641 acres). About 20 percent of the watershed is in the deep groundwater recharge zone (Zone III). During the summer months, the water in the Forge has experienced polluted1 conditions as evidenced by fish and crab kills, foul odors, rotting algal debris in the water, and sections of the river have sporadically turned milky white. These symptoms were especially severe during the summer of 2005 and the river has remained in a deteriorated state ever since. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Suffolk County, and the Town of Brookhaven have set an agenda to determine the causes of pollution and to identify potential remediation measures in the Forge River. Investigators at Stony Brook University’s School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (SoMAS) were initially charged with ________________________________________________ 1 Marine pollution – “the introduction by man, directly or indirectly, of substances or energy to the marine environment resulting in deleterious effects such as: hazards to humans, health; hindrance of marine activities, including fishing, .
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York
    Long Island Duck Farm History and Ecosystem Restoration Opportunities Suffolk County, Long Island, New York February 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County, NY New York District Table of Contents Section Page Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ 1 List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Purpose..................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 History of Duck Farming on Long Island................................................................................ 1 4.0 Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Duck Waste Statistics ....................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Off-site Impacts of Duck Farm Operation........................................................................ 3 4.2.1 Duck Sludge Deposits.................................................................................................... 4 4.3 On-site Impacts of Duck Farm Operation......................................................................... 5 5.0
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7 Acre Industrial Site in Red Hook Available for Lease Featuring 15,000 Sq
    EXCLUSIVE LISTING 3.7 Acre Industrial Site in Red Hook Available For Lease Featuring 15,000 Sq. Ft. Warehouse Ideal for Fleet Parking | Rare Last Mile Distribution 688 Court Street For Lease Brooklyn, NY 11231 2Q ’22 Delivery All information is from sources deemed reliable and is submitted subject to errors, omission, changes of price or other conditions, prior sale, rent and withdrawal without notice. Property Overview 688 Court Street is a 3.7 acre (160,000 sq. ft.) industrial-zoned lot located in the Red Hook sub-market of Brooklyn, NY. This is a rare opportunity for tenants with fleet parking requirements, especially those interested in establishing critical mass in Brooklyn or the boroughs. The gated, paved site is improved with a 15,000 sq. ft. warehouse that contains five (5) roll up doors, and 30 ft. - 40 ft. ceiling heights. The Property features 605 linear feet of combined, unobstructed frontage with multiple points of access including two (2) automatic gates on Court Street and Clinton Street. The site is powered by 3,000 amps of electric service that is sufficient to accommodate electric vehicle charging requirements. Red Hook is strategically located at the intersection of the Gowanus Expressway / Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (I-278), Hugh L. Carey Tunnel (I-478), and New York State Route 27, which connect 688 Court Street to the boroughs, New Jersey, Long Island, and all major NYC area airports. Proposed Parking Plan * Proposed Parking Plan shows 277 vehicles * Proposed charging station median pinnaclereny.com pinnaclereny.com 718–784–8282 718–784–8282 688courtstreet.com 688courtstreet.com All information is from sources deemed reliable and is submitted subject to errors, omission, changes of price or other conditions, prior sale, rent and withdrawal without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Fdlal LAND USE PLAN
    FDlAL COU~~ROAD 5 1COruuDOR LAND USE PLAN I'n:JWW lor roWi\ (W ORCX )I-.IIA Vt.. " Ju~ 2007 Cashn ~ iales, P.C. EJoO"".~"O ·., u~~ M ~UC'O~ ..... Of .. !.' Acknowledgement The Town Of Brookhaven wishes to acknowledge and thank all those citizens who participated in the formulation of the County Road 51 Corridor Land Use Plan through attendance at Public Information Meetings, Public Hearings, and Working Group Meetings. Town of Brookhaven Final CR 51 Corridor Land Use Plan July 2007 2.1.3 Housing 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.2 Land Use 15 2.2.1 Agricultural Land 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 2.2.3 Vacant Land 15 2.2.3 Residential Uses 17 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.2.4 Commercial/Industrial Uses 17 1.1 Need and Purpose 1 2.2.5 Airports 17 1.2 Planning Area Location 2 2.3 Zoning 18 1.3 Land Use Plan Background 2 2.4 Environmental Conditions 21 1.4 Guiding Principles 4 2.4.1 Geology 21 1.5 Methodology 5 2.4.2 SoilslFarmland 21 1.6 Prior Plans and Studies 6 2.4.3 Topography 21 1.6.1 CR 51 Corridor Based Land Use Study (2006) 2.4.4 Groundwater 22 6 2.4.5 Wetlands and Surface Waters 26 1.6.2 Open Space Committee Recommendations 8 2.4.6 Flood Hazard 27 1.6.3 Long Island South Shore Estuary Reserve 2.4.7 Ecology 27 Comprehensive Management Plan (2001) 8 2.4.8 Critical Environmental Areas (CEAs) 32 1.6.4 Spadaro Airport Master Plan (1997) 9 2.5 Aesthetic Qualities and Scenic Vistas 34 1.6.5 Central Pine Barrens Comprehensive Land Use 2.6 Town Target Preservation! Acquisition Areas 34 Plan (1996) 9 2.7 Transportation 35 1.6.6 Moriches Four~Hamlet Comprehensive Plan
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE That
    NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Article 9 of the New York State Constitution, the provisions of the Town Law and Municipal Home Rule of the State of New York, both as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Town Meeting Pavilion, Hempstead Town Hall, 1 Washington Street, Hempstead, New York, on the 25th day of April, 2017, at 10:30 o'clock in the forenoon of that day to consider the enactment of a local law to amend Chapter 202 of the code of the Town of Hempstead to INCLUDE "REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS " to limit parking at the following locations: BELLMORE OAK STREET (TH 73/17) South Side - TWO HOUR PARKING Section 202-15 11 AM - 2 PM EXCEPT SATURDAY, SUNDAY and HOLIDAYS - starting at a point 195 feet west of a point opposite the west curbline of Oak Court, west for a distance of 53 feet. WOODMERE LAFAYETTE PLACE (TH 81/17) East Side - NO PARKING Section 202-17 SUNDAYS 11 AM - 2 PM and MONDAY THRU THURSDAY 5 PM - 7 PM - starting at a point 30 feet north of the north curbline of Central Ave., north for a distance of 180 feet. LAFAYETTE PLACE (TH 81/17) East Side - TWO HOUR PARKING 7 AM - 7 PM EXCEPT SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS and HOLIDAYS - starting at a point 295 feet north of the north curbline of Central Ave., north to the south curbline of Cedar Lane ALSO, to REPEAL from Chapter 202 "REGULATIONS & RESTRICTIONS" to limit parking at the following locations: HEWLETT PROSPECT AVENUE - NORTH SIDE (TH 548/67) NO Section 202-16 PARKING 8 AM to 4 PM EXCEPT SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS and HOLIDAYS - starting at a point opposite a point 28 feet east of the east curbline of Slocum Street, west for a distance of 92 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT LONG ISLAND a Train-To-Plane Connectivity Study Cover Illustration by Alex J
    TRANSPORT LONG ISLAND A Train-to-Plane Connectivity Study Cover Illustration by Alex J. Wallach, Suolk County EDP County Suolk Wallach, Alex J. by Illustration Cover May 2018 Appendices Transport Long Island: A Train-to-Plane Connectivity Study May 2018 Appendix A. Mode Book Appendix B. Existing Conditions and Connection Modes Identification Memo Appendix C. Project Screening Criteria Memo Appendix D. High-Level Implementation Plans Memo Appendix E. Public Information Session Materials Appendix F. Cost Estimate Classification and General Assumptions Appendix G. Key Reference Documents Appendix H. Environmental Review Effort Assessment References 57 Appendix A. Mode Book Upgraded Taxis Overview Upgraded fleet for-hire vehicles offer rides for individual passengers or small groups. Rides are summoned by hailing a taxi parked at a stand or driving by. Precedents Many airports around the country advertise taxi services that connect terminals with rail stations. Examples include Trenton-Mercer, Long Beach, Harrisburg, and New Haven. At MacArthur Airport Orientation to pick-up areas would be facilitated by signage at Ronkonkoma Station. Service awareness and convenience of transaction would be improved with updated LIRR ticket vending machines and app. New York City Hybrid Taxi, New York, NY (Image source: Karthik T J, Wikimedia) Upgraded Taxis Delivery Time Frame Taxis are the current mode of user selection of Ronkonkoma connection between Ronkonkoma as a destination. At Ronkonkoma < 2 years 2-5 years 5 years + Station and MacArthur Airport. Station, wayfinding and ease of Village Taxi drives LI MacArthur- orientation would be improved with Costs bound passengers from more conspicuous signage guiding Capital Expenditures Ronkonkoma Station for a flat fare to the taxi stand.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVY GYM PROPERTY ADJOINING the MITCHEL FIELD VETERAN HOUSING COMMUNITY (“NAVY GYM”) RFEI# MF1019-01 Issue Date: October 15, 2019
    REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT ON THE MITCHEL NAVY GYM PROPERTY ADJOINING THE MITCHEL FIELD VETERAN HOUSING COMMUNITY (“NAVY GYM”) RFEI# MF1019-01 Issue Date: October 15, 2019 The Site TABLE OF CONTENTS This RFEI contains the following sections: A. Introduction B. Project Objectives C. Site Description About the Site Ownership and Legal Structure Zoning Utilities Transportation Neighborhood and County Environs C. Anticipated RFEI Schedule E. RFEI Submission Instructions Organization of Proposal RFEI Inquiries Site Visit F. Submission Requirements G. Terms and Conditions Appendices: Appendix A – Mitchel Navy Gym Property Development Site Appendix B – Mitchel Navy Gym Property Parking 2 A. INTRODUCTION Smith & DeGroat Real Estate (“the Agent”), as agents for Nassau County, New York (the “County”) seeks proposals (“Proposals”) from qualified not-for-profit organizations to enter into a long term lease of the Mitchel Navy Gym Property (the “Navy Gym”) to develop the site (“Site”) shown in Appendix A. The County’s vision is for an athletic facility that will serve the youth of Nassau County and veteran community contiguous to the Site. The total available developable space is approximately 2.31 acres, including the existing gym. The goal of this RFEI is to solicit ideas that will advance economic development and public policy goals while maximizing economic benefits to the County with the least economic and environmental risk. The County intends to use responses and recommendations generated by this RFEI as potential guidelines for the Scope of Services in any future Requests for Proposals (“RFP”). In particular, the RFEI proposal process might include: (i) the proposed use of the Site; (ii) the proposed plan of development including capital investment; (iii) parking requirements; (iv) suggested lease terms; (v) benefits to County residents (vi) benefits to the veteran community; B.
    [Show full text]
  • 05/10/2019 Review of the Proposed Capital Program 2020-2022 Capital Budget 2020
    SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE Robert Lipp BUDGET REVIEW OFFICE Director May 10, 2019 DuWayne Gregory, Presiding Officer and Members of the Suffolk County Legislature Dear Legislators: Accompanying this letter is the Budget Review Office Review of the Proposed 2020-2022 Capital Program and 2020 Capital Budget. On a personal note, I would like to thank the entire staff of the Budget Review Office for their hard work and long hours in preparation of this report. I am confident you will find the quality of this report up to Budget Review Office standards. The credit for our work effort goes to each and every member of the Budget Review Office. My staff and I remain ready to provide whatever assistance the Legislature may require during the capital program and budget evaluation and amending process. Sincerely, Robert Lipp, Director Mailing Address: P. O. Box 6100, Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 (631) 853-4100 FAX: (631) 853-5496 e-mail: [email protected] SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE DuWayne Gregory, Presiding Officer Robert Calarco, Deputy Presiding Officer District 1 Al Krupski 2 Bridget Fleming 3 Rudy A. Sunderman 4 Thomas Muratore 5 Kara Hahn 6 Sarah S. Anker 7 Robert Calarco 8 William J. Lindsay, III 9 Samuel Gonzalez 10 Thomas Cilmi 11 Steven J. Flotteron 12 Leslie Kennedy 13 Robert Trotta 14 Kevin J. McCaffrey 15 DuWayne Gregory 16 Susan A. Berland 17 Tom Donnelly 18 William Spencer Clerk of the Legislature Jason Richberg Counsel to the Legislature Sarah Simpson SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE The Budget Review Office Robert Lipp, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]