DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 1: Inter-Testamental Period—The Silence of God Between Malachi and Matthew?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture 1: Inter-Testamental Period—The Silence of God Between Malachi and Matthew? LECTURE 1: INTER-TESTAMENTAL PERIOD—THE SILENCE OF GOD BETWEEN MALACHI AND MATTHEW? WHAT IS HISTORY? • History is linear: Isaiah 46:8-11. • History has a purpose: Isa 46:10. • Definition: God working out his plan for humanity. • The flow of history bares divine Sovereignty and Providence and reflects the Glory of God. • All written history is interpretation. • No purely objective history. • Filtered thru author’s social situation, political commitment, and religious views. • When we look at ancient history, much of it reflects the writings of victors. • War stories written by victors and record their accounts, many times embellished. • Biblical history is different-we believe it is inspired and thus accurate. • The HS authenticated the written history in Bible, thus it is accurate. • The Bible gives us a supernatural interpretation of the meaning of history. • Not just facts, but interpreted facts with supernatural meaning. • History is doxological-JC is at the center and God’s glory is the goal. • Creation, salvation, glorification all serve the purpose of glorifying God. • When we read the Bible, we see theology intertwined with history. • Sometimes it’s hard to separate the two but due to biblical inerrancy and inspiration, we can trust history and theology in the Bible. • There is a reason why so much of the bible is history. o 1 Cor 10:6,11 o OT is given to us so we would study the characters and the story of Israel and learn spiritual lessons from it o OT history is really a history of the working out of Deut 28:1-2, 15, 64 o The rest of the OT tells how God fulfilled this promise given thru Moses just before Israel entered the Promise Land • As we read these stories and fit the OT & the four centuries after the OT into the history of the empires that were sovereign over other nations, you will see that when Israel obeyed God, she was blessed but when she disobeyed God, as a nation she was judged. • This is the lesson God wants us to learn from our reading of the OT, in fact this is repeated in Hebrews 4 where the author appeals to his Jewish audience to not turn away from Christ as the first generation of the Exiting Israelites turned away from God in the wilderness. His appeal to be loyal to Christ is based on a historical OT example, reminding them of what happens to people who reject JC. • As you listen, don’t see the next few weeks as merely a history lesson, make these connections in your mind and reflect on where you are forfeiting God’s blessings because of your disobedience. INTER-TESTAMENTAL HISTORY • What happened in the Bible between Mal 4:6 and Matt 1:1? • Have you ever noticed that when you read the OT there are no Pharisees, no Sadducees, no Herod, no Romans, no Samaritans, nothing about the crucifixion, people do not attend synagogues but when you read the NT all these individuals, groups and institutions dominate the life of JC. Jesus deals with them almost on a daily basis. • Where did these institutions and groups come from? • You think about the OT and it only has the Ark of the Covenant, tabernacle, and a temple, but the NT has the ark, the temple, and synagogues? Well what are they for? Were they mini temples? • The very last verses of the OT is Mal 4:5-6 • Written from Persia (modern: Iran) 400BC • 100yrs after the 2nd temple is completed 516BC • 100yrs after many Jews returned (536BC) from Babylonian Exile • And they are back at doing the same sins they were exiled over • Divorce is rampant • Sacrifices are corrupt, worst animals are offered to God • They have stopped tithing biblically • Sorcery, adultery, financial corruption, social injustices like oppression of the orphans, foreigners, and poor is blatant • God is being openly mocked • People are actually saying it is vain to serve YHWH. What has God ever done for me? is the attitude dominating Israel (Malachi 3:14) • You know how God responds? Mal 4:2-3, 5-6 • Thru Malachi, the last prophet before the NT era, God promises a Messiah and a forerunner to the Messiah • But after God makes this promise, it’s as if he stopped interacting with his people, we don’t have any inspired words from God until Matt 1:1, which occurs 4-6BC. God is silent from 417BC-6BC • The period was dominated by constant warfare for the area known today as Israel • The Jews who lived in that area were slowly losing their OT Jewish identity because of a new language and new social ideals • The OT Jews and the NT Jews were very different OT SURVEY v Creation: Gen 1-11 =>Pre 2000BC o Catalogs origin of world, evil, sin, ethnicities, languages v Patriarchs: Gen 12-50 =2200-1800BC o Origin of people of God o Purpose of people of God: § Gen 12:3c o Through Abraham-Isaac-Jacob-12 sons, God continued his promise v Egyptian Slavery: 1800-1400BC o Famine forced the 12 sons to Egypt o They multiplied and fulfilled Gen 15:5 v Exodus & Entrance • Books: Exod-Deut • 1445-1405BC • Wandering in the wilderness o They followed moses for 16month before Num 13-14-spies report and grumbling o 40 yrs=40 days of spying the land (Num 14:34) o So at 1.5yrs out of Egypt, they scatter and do not gather back up until 40th year • Joshua 1405-1385BC (conquest/land division) v Judges • 1385-1050BC • Israel is tribal • Ruled by 12 Judges • Constantly at war with Mesopotamia, Philistines, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Canaanites, Midianites • Tragic Period o Cycle: Israel sins, judgment, repentance, deliverance o 17:6, 18:1, 19:1, 21:25 • Sets up the transition to monarchy v United Kingdom: Saul, David, Solomon • 1050-930BC • 1,2 Samuel, 1 Kings 1-11 • Israel is a Superpower of ANE: politically, religiously, socially, economically, militarily Saul’s reign: (1050-1010) was dominated by wars with the Philistines, Ammonites, Amalekites, Moabites, Edomites David’s reign: (1010-970) was not much different. The first (about 7yrs- 2 Sam 3) of his reign was a civil war with the house of Saul. Then he constantly fought the Philistines, Jebusites, Moabites, Syria, Edomites, Ammonites, king of Zobah. • But the low point of his reign was when Joab (the commanded of the army and his nephew) was fighting with Ammon and David committed adultery with Bathsheba, ordering the murder of her husband Uriah. • Shortly after that, his son Absalom lead a revolution against David. For 4 years Absalom was planning it, which shows David’s bad fathering skills since he had no idea what his son was doing and then experienced a family civil war. There was one more rebellion by the leader (Sheba 2 Sam 20) of the Benjamites but was quickly suppressed. • When David came to the end of his life, it seemed that the sword never left his hand. He fought the enemy on each side of Jerusalem, he fought the enemy within and he was successful. He established the first Empire of Israel and the nations surrounding Jerusalem paid taxes to Israel. • But one thing disturbed his heart, his biggest desire was to build a permanent building for the Ark of YHWH but God said he won’t have the privilege, instead his son will do it Solomon’s Reign: • When his son Solomon came to power, after much internal strife—fighting for the throne with his half brother Adonijah who was joined by Solomon’s cousin Joab (david’s top general, david’s nephew) and Abiathar the priest who followed David for decades after David rescued him from Saul’s murderous plan when he killed 85 priests at Nob, these three formed a triumvirate to develop a coup d'état. 2/3 were executed, abiathar was exiled since he was a priest from Eli’s lineage • Subsequently, Solomon took up construction and military reinforcement of the empire his father David left him. • Solomon instituted high taxes, mandatory military service, nearly enslaved people for his building projects, such as palaces (his-13yrs, 30,000sq ft, built after temple ), forts, and the temple (7yrs, 2500sq ft). His construction projects were international involving employees from various through the alliances he made through marriage. • The reason he married 700 women was to have political ties with the nations of those women, he married princesses and relatives of kings and rulers. His marriages were driven by politics not lust. He improved the economy, fortified the empire, and build the temple David wanted to build. • Solomon ruled the Empire of Israel during its Golden Age from 970-930BC. • 2 Chron 9:22-28 READ, 1 Kgs 11:3 o Horses, silver, gold, wives o Deut 17:14-17Read o Solomon did exactly what God told the king not to do • He oppressed the people and pained God • Well when he died people wanted a break, so they appealed to his son Rehoboam to ease up the burden of employment, taxation, and military service. Rehoboam wisely asked his counselors on what to do but unwisely listened to his friends rather than the elders of Israel (1 Kgs 12:6-11,16,19). • The end result, ten tribes rebelled against Rehoboam and formed Israel under the leadership of Jeroboam while two tribes remained loyal to Solomon’s son, Rehoboam. This happened in 930BC and from that point on, Judah and Israel never reunited. v Divided Kingdom: Ø Israel (10 tribes) (North) o Samaria is the capital o Jeroboam ->Hoshea 722BC, 19kings o Assyria, 40-50yrs after Jonah, came and destroyed Israel 1 Kgs 17:7-23 o 612BC Nineveh was destroyed by Babylon, according to Nahum Ø Judah (2 tribes) (South) o Jerusalem is the capital o Rehoboam->Zedekiah 586BC, 20 kings o Jerusalem, temple burned, many exiled Ø Israel worse than Judah and is destroyed first, but Judah exceeds Israel’s immorality and about 120 years later, God judges Judah for her sins Ø 1 Kings 12-22, 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles 10-36 Ø Civil war between the two, competition Ø Zech 7:8-14 (cf 2 Kgs 17) has some great insight into why God judged Israel and Judah.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Developments in New Testament Study
    Developments in New Testament Study Arthur Freeman Moravian Theological Seminary Bethlehem, PA February 2, 1994 These materials may be reproduced as long as credit is given. CONTENTS I NEW PERSPECTIVES ............................................................................................... 1 The Intertestamental Period ................................................................................ 2 Essenes .................................................................................................... 2 Pseudepigrapha ....................................................................................... 3 Nag Hammadi, etc................................................................................... 3 Wisdom ................................................................................................... 3 Apocalyptic ............................................................................................. 4 Gnosticism............................................................................................... 5 The New Testament Apocrypha.............................................................. 6 The Research on the Historical Jesus.................................................................. 6 Authorship and Sources of the Gospels .............................................................. 10 Changing Attitudes about the Historical-Critical Method. ................................. 12 Hermeneutical Approaches ................................................................................. 14 II
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Angelology Angelology
    Christian Angelology Angelology Introduction Why study Angels? They teach us about God As part of God’s creation, to study them is to study why God created the way he did. In looking at angels we can see God’s designs for his creation, which tells us something about God himself. They teach us about ourselves We share many similar qualities to the angels. We also have several differences due to them being spiritual beings. In looking at these similarities and differences we can learn more about the ways God created humanity. In looking at angels we can avoid “angelic fallacies” which attempt to turn men into angels. They are fascinating! Humans tend to be drawn to the supernatural. Spiritual beings such as angels hit something inside of us that desires to “return to Eden” in the sense of wanting to reconnect ourselves to the spiritual world. They are different, and different is interesting to us. Fr. J. Wesley Evans 1 Christian Angelology Angels in the Christian Worldview Traditional Societies/World of the Bible Post-Enlightenment Worldview Higher Reality God, gods, ultimate forces like karma and God (sometimes a “blind watchmaker”) fate [Religion - Private] Middle World Lesser spirits (Angels/Demons), [none] demigods, magic Earthly Reality Human social order and community, the Humanity, Animals, Birds, Plants, as natural world as a relational concept of individuals and as technical animals, plants, ect. classifications [Science - Public] -Adapted from Heibert, “The Flaw of the Excluded Middle” Existence of Angels Revelation: God has revealed their creation to us in scripture. Experience: People from across cultures and specifically Christians, have attested to the reality of spirits both good and bad.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle
    The W.E.L.L. Stoneybrooke Christian Schools Sherry L. Worel www.sherryworel.com 2012.UTB.12 Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle I. An overview There are nearly 470 verses in our bible used to describe the form and furnishings of the Tabernacle and Temple. The bible gives a very specific plan for the building of the tabernacle. However, the temple is not outlined in detail. I Chron. 28:11‐19 does seem to indicate that the Lord gave David some sort of plan or model. The tabernacle was an ornate tent shrine that served the people of Israel for approximately 200 years until it was replaced by Solomon’s temple. This temple served as God’s home for approximately 400 years until the Babylonians destroyed it in 586 BC. When the Israelites returned from Babylon, Zerubbabel over saw the rebuilding of a much inferior temple in 520 BC. This building was damaged and repaired many times until Herod built his “renovation” in 19 BC. The Roman General, Titus destroyed this temple in 70AD. II. The Tabernacle (The Tent of Meeting or Place of Dwelling) A. Consider the New Testament perspective: Hebrews 9:9‐11, 10:1, Col. 2:17 and Revelation 15:5, 21:3 B. Moses was given a model of this meeting house by God Himself (Ex. 25:40) C. The craftsmen Bezalel and Oholiab built this ornate tent. See Ex. 25‐27, 35‐40 for all the details. 1. There was a linen fence that formed an outer courtyard. In that courtyard were two furnishings: a.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Bible Study 2 Chronicles 18-22
    THROUGH THE BIBLE STUDY 2 CHRONICLES 18-22 The children’s series VeggieTales has sold over 52 million DVD and VHS copies. Bob the Tomato and Larry the Cucumber teach biblical values to kids. The series became so popular it was sold to NBC and added to its Saturday morning kids programming. But it didn’t take long for NBC editors to go to work. Non-historical references to God and the Bible were sliced - even Bob and Larry’s trademark ending - “Remember kids, God made you special, and loves you very much…” - is gone. The vitamins were cooked out of VeggieTales. The series’ creator, Phil Vischer confessed, had he known how much the shows would change he wouldn’t have signed on to the network deal. Vischer sums it up this way, “VeggieTales is religious – NBC is not.” It’s a classic case of what the Bible calls being “unequally yoked.” 2 Corinthians 6:14 says it best, “Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers.” This is a farming analogy… Different species of animals, with diverse natures, harnessed together will struggle to cooperate. They’ll pull in opposite directions. And when a Christian becomes entangled with a non- Christian in a legally binding relationship some kind of compromise is the inevitable outcome. !1 It happens when a believer and an unbeliever go into business. It happens when a believer and an unbeliever get married. It happens when NBC and VeggieTales partner together. And it happened when Jehoshaphat joined forces with Israel. 2 Chronicles 18, “Jehoshaphat had riches and honor in abundance; and by marriage he allied himself with Ahab.” Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, married the daughter of his northern rival, King Ahab.
    [Show full text]
  • JOASH SAVED / JEHOIADA, FAITHFUL PRIEST Story Notes File No
    2 KINGS 11:1–21 2 Kings 8:16–18, 25, 26; 2 Chronicles 22: 10 — 23:21 JOASH SAVED / JEHOIADA, FAITHFUL PRIEST Story Notes File no. 82 Athaliah became queen mother in the South. Her parents were King Ahab and Jezebel of the northern tribes but she alone was left of all her royal family. Jehu had killed her son, the king. Here in the South, she sought to grasp a throne for herself and Ahab’s family by killing all her remaining sons who could inherit the throne in David’s name. That is, she thought she had killed them all. God had promised to bless the world through David’s line. One of her stepdaughters had married the priest Jehoiada, and they rescued one son. God’s promise was kept (2 Sam. 7:11; Ps. 89:36) and Solomon’s prayer was heard (1 Kings 8:25). The lamp of David was not extinguished (1 Kings 11:36; Ps. 132:17). When the son was old enough to be presented to the nation, Jehoiada staged a coup de etat. Surprise was gained by off duty soldiers joining those on duty, and coming to the temple unarmed as if to worship, and then being armed from an arsenal within the temple. Joash was crowned and given a copy of the covenant and proclaimed king to the acclaim of the nation. It appears that army commanders and priesthood, together with the people welcomed the restoration of covenant loyalty to Yahweh. Athaliah and the house of Ahab were finished and Baalism had suffered a crushing blow.
    [Show full text]
  • High Priests Garments and History
    THE HIGH PRIEST - GARMENTS AND HISTORY Historical Significance and Symbolism Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE HIGH PRIEST • Brief Introduction • Appearance in the VSL • Garments – Biblical Explanations – Use in Royal Arch • Observations Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM TRIVIA • Master of the Chapter – in United States – Excellent High Priest, King, and Scribe • In United Kingdom – First, Second, Third Principal • In Ireland – Excellent King, High Priest and Chief Scribe Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM TRIVIA • In United Kingdom – First, Second, Third Principal – Most Excellent Zerubbabel Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE HIGH PRIEST • Master of a Chapter • Member of the Grand Council • Past High Priest – Wears a distinctive Symbol Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM ROYAL ARCH - HIGH PRIEST SYMBOL • Is the Breastplate of the High Priest of Israel • Described in Exodus 28 • Created in Exodus 39 • Worn by Aaron in Leviticus 8 Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE HIGH PRIEST OF ISRAEL • Aaron was the first – Exodus 28 • Was to be successive through Aaron’s line – Aaron Eleazar Phinehas Abishua Bukki Uzzi – Ithamar Eli Ahitub Ahijah Ahimelech Abiathar • Solomon – Abiathar Zadok (High Priest at completion of the First Temple) Joseph Martinez Manassas Chapter #81, RAM THE FIRST TEMPLE • David – Abiathar and Zadok were High Priests in tandem • Solomon – When Adonijah tries to claim power and kingship • Abiathar sides with Adonijah’s camp – David near death proclaims Solomon
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus Writings Outline
    THE WARS OF THE JEWS OR THE HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM – BOOK I CONTAINING FROM THE TAKING OF JERUSALEM BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES TO THE DEATH OF HEROD THE GREAT. (THE INTERVAL OF 177 YEARS) CHAPTER 1: HOW THE CITY JERUSALEM WAS TAKEN, AND THE TEMPLE PILLAGED [BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES]; AS ALSO CONCERNING THE ACTIONS OF THE MACCABEES, MATTHIAS AND JUDAS; AND CONCERNING THE DEATH OF JUDAS. CHAPTER 2: CONCERNING THE SUCCESSORS OF JUDAS; WHO WERE JONATHAN AND SIMON, AND JOHN HYRCANUS? CHAPTER 3: HOW ARISTOBULUS WAS THE FIRST THAT PUT A DIADEM ABOUT HIS HEAD; AND AFTER HE HAD PUT HIS MOTHER AND BROTHER TO DEATH, DIED HIMSELF, WHEN HE HAD REIGNED NO MORE THAN A YEAR. CHAPTER 4: WHAT ACTIONS WERE DONE BY ALEXANDER JANNEUS, WHO REIGNED TWENTY- SEVEN YEARS. CHAPTER 5: ALEXANDRA REIGNS NINE YEARS, DURING WHICH TIME THE PHARISEES WERE THE REAL RULERS OF THE NATION. CHAPTER 6: WHEN HYRCANUS WHO WAS ALEXANDER'S HEIR, RECEDED FROM HIS CLAIM TO THE CROWN ARISTOBULUS IS MADE KING; AND AFTERWARD THE SAME HYRCANUS BY THE MEANS OF ANTIPATER; IS BROUGHT BACK BY ABETAS. AT LAST POMPEY IS MADE THE ARBITRATOR OF THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE BROTHERS. CHAPTER 7: HOW POMPEY HAD THE CITY OF JERUSALEM DELIVERED UP TO HIM BUT TOOK THE TEMPLE BY FORCE. HOW HE WENT INTO THE HOLY OF HOLIES; AS ALSO WHAT WERE HIS OTHER EXPLOITS IN JUDEA. CHAPTER 8: ALEXANDER, THE SON OF ARISTOBULUS, WHO RAN AWAY FROM POMPEY, MAKES AN EXPEDITION AGAINST HYRCANUS; BUT BEING OVERCOME BY GABINIUS HE DELIVERS UP THE FORTRESSES TO HIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Intertestamental and Early Rabbinic Literature: an Annotated Bibliographic Resource Updated (Part 1)
    JETS 55/2 (2012) 235–72 JEWISH INTERTESTAMENTAL AND EARLY RABBINIC LITERATURE: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIC RESOURCE UPDATED (PART 1) DAVID W. CHAPMAN AND ANDREAS J. KÖSTENBERGER* Twelve years ago we published a bibliography that is now due for a substantial update. 1 The field of Jewish literature can be mystifying to the non- specialist. The initial obstacle often is where to go for texts, translations, concordances, and bibliography. Even many researchers more familiar with these materials often fail to take advantage of the best critical texts, translations, and helps currently available. The goal of this article is to summarize in a single location the principal texts, translations, and foundational resources for the examination of the central Jewish literature potentially pertinent to the background study of early Christianity. Generally, the procedure followed for each Jewish writing is to list the most important works in the categories of: bibliography, critical text, translation, concordance/index, lexical or grammatical aides, introduction, and commentary. Where deemed helpful, more than one work may be included. English translations, introductions, and helps are generally preferred. Most entries are listed alphabetically by author, but bibliographies and texts are typically listed in reverse chronological order from date of publication. Also provided in many instances are the language(s) of extant manuscripts and the likely dates of composition reflecting the current scholarly consensus. While the emphasis is on printed editions, some computer-based resources are noted. Many older printed texts have been scanned and are now available online; we will note when these appear on http://archive.org (often links can also be found through http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu or http://books.google.com).
    [Show full text]
  • The Aaronic Priesthood Exodus 28:1
    THE AARONIC PRIESTHOOD EXODUS 28:1 Man has an inherent knowledge of God (Rom. 1:18-32) and sinfulness (Rom. 2:14-15) and it seems every religion has some sort of priesthood to repre- sent man to God. In the case of Judaism, it was the Aaronic Priesthood. Romans 1:18–19 18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteous- ness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. Romans 2:14–15 14For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, 15in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bear- ing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, In Exodus 27:21, we noted the first hint of the appointment of Aaron and his sons to be the priests of Yahweh. In Exodus 28:1, the appointment was offi- cially proclaimed. Exodus 28:1 1“Then bring near to yourself Aaron your brother, and his sons with ,to Me—Aaron [כָּהַן] him, from among the sons of Israel, to minister as priest Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, Aaron’s sons. and it refers to the כֹּהֵן is not the word for priest; that word is כָּהַן The word means to ,כָּהַן ,position of priest as mediator between God and man. This word act or to serve as a priest, hence, the NASB translates it to “minister as priest.” One is the noun and one is the verb.
    [Show full text]