Copyrighted Material

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyrighted Material 1 1 MM and MTM for Mobility One main purpose of this chapter is to introduce the hardware technology that delivers mobility. Before introducing the hardware technology, however, it is important to elaborate on the content and extent of mobility. Of course, mobility is not possible without communication networks, wired or the otherwise. Here we review the convergence of communications (wired with wireless, switched circuits with packeted circuits, voice with data, GERAN with UTRAN, wireless WAN with wireless LAN) first. The convergence of communications begins with a consolidation of circuit‐ and packet‐switched networks at low‐level physical layers (wired networks, including cop- per twisted pairs and optical fiber cables), then air interfaces with the wireless‐WAN (commonly known as 2G, 3G, and 4G) and wireless‐LAN (commony known as wifi). The tasks are done through 3GPP releases up to Rel 7 for 3G. Currently, 5G is under development, thus, 5G goals and key technologies to achieve the goals are discussed. Since mobility is actually achieved by combination of wired and wireless networks, we then review the key products employed in both networks. We found the communica- tion products encompass different industries; for example, optical fiber industry where silica glass is the main material used for optical links, cabling industry where copper and plastics are heavily used to form connectors and cables, and semiconductor and PCB (printed circuit board) industries where silicon and organic materials are employed for devices and components miniaturization. After reviewing the products employed in wired and wireless networks, it is time to take a look at hardware fabrication and integration technologies, from which commu- nication products are constructed. In this chapter, we discuss state‐of‐the‐art MM (more Moore approach) and MTM (more than Moore approach) processes. Both are planar processing technologies, and suitable for mass production, with MM employing semiconductors COPYRIGHTEDand MTM PCB (LTCC, too). MM MATERIAL takes place in wafer foundries and MTM in OSAT (outsourced semiconductor assembly and test) sites. MM and MTM are traditionally known as IC fabrication and packaging specialities. In Section 1.3, we review briefly the state of the art MM and MTM hardware tech- nologies in realizing transistors and a combo consisting of A‐series AP and its mobile memory, the most critical device and component in handheld mobiles. Transistor engineering is the most important achievement in MM in recent years, which can be represented by HKMG (high‐k metal gate) and TriGate developments. Figure 1.1 below shows device construction with HKMG. The combination of the high‐k 3D IC and RF SiPs: Advanced Stacking and Planar Solutions for 5G Mobility, First Edition. Lih-Tyng Hwang and Tzyy-Sheng Jason Horng. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd. Published 2018 by John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd. Companion website: www.wiley.com/go/hwangic 0003388903.INDD 1 3/12/2018 6:47:52 PM 2 3D IC and RF SiPs: Advanced Stacking and Planar Solutions for 5G Mobility High-k Metal gate Figure 1.1 HKMG, three sides are high‐k dielectric, and the gate is metalized at the top surface. D S Oxide Silicon TriGate Figure 1.2 A FinFET constructing from multiple TriGates; each ridge in a TriGate is covered on D three sides. Oxide S Silicon material (the darker layer) and metal gate gives the transistor much better performance (reduced leakage and enhanced transistor stability, respectively) than would be possible with a traditional silicon dioxide (dielectric) and polysilicon (non‐metal) gate. Figure 1.2 shows a 3D FinFET transistor constructed with multiple TriGates (triple- gates). It is named because each ridge in a TriGate is covered on three sides. The tech- nology, along with Intel’s gate last approach, extended Moore’s Law into 32 nm (technology node) and below; therefore, is considered an important MM contribution. In September of each year, the world, especially the electronics industry and business, are all watching the birth of a new iPhone, in which A‐series AP and its main mobile memory LPDDR are focused. It is because A‐series AP and its mobile memory are the heart, literally, of many Apple iPhones, and mass production of them (the A‐series AP device or the PoP combo of AP and the LPDDR memory) represents a yearly crowning achievement. A‐series AP (A4, A5, …) and its mobile memory, LPDDR, are packaged in an advanced package, the so‐called “PoP (packaged on a package),” shown in Figure 1.3. Note that the dual‐die memory in Figure 1.3 is not symmetrically placed with respect to the AP below. Wirebonding may be one of the factors. The dual‐LPDDR set is on the top, whereas the application processor is on the bottom. The configuration may enhance greatly the pro- cessor’s performance; however, heat dissipation by the AP is a concern. In later AP(A7)/ LPDDR3 PoP for iPhone 5S, there are three rows of TMVs (through molding vias, see Figures 3.24 and 3.25 in Chapter 3), whereas there are only two rows, as shown in Figure 1.3. The added row may be designed to assist heat removal. 0003388903.INDD 2 3/12/2018 6:47:53 PM MM and MTM for Mobility 3 Figure 1.3 A cross‐sectional view of AP(A4)/LPDDR combo in PoP for iPhone 4. Two rows of TMVs are conspicuous on each side. Source: Image courtesy of Chipworks Inc. A9 employs 14 nm and/or 16 nm, depending on the manufacturer Samsumg (14 nm) or TSMC (16 nm). Various sources have indicated A10, used by iPhone 7 and available in September 2016, may be still fabricated using TSMC’s 16 nm technology; neverthe- less, the most advanced 10 nm technology is likely to be used to produce Qualcom’s AP, Snapdragon 835 by Samsung.[1] Because both MM and MTM hardware are introduced in this chapter, it is important to understand the difference between them. Let’s use the following table to illustrate the differences (Table 1.1). Figures 1.50 and 1.51 (shown later in this chapter) are an important summary to this chapter. Figure 1.50 illustrates the state of the art packages empolyed; x‐axis indicates the level of integration, and y‐axis the level of monolithicity (versus hybrid approach). Figure 1.51 illustrates the business division between MM and MTM. MTM hardware technology will be important in meeting the demands of the future 5G mobility. The topic is discussed briefly at the end of the chapter; but, in Chapter 9 more details on future hardware technologies for 5G mobility are offered. Table 1.1 MM and MTM comparison. MM (Wafer foundry) MTM (OSAT) Processing Photo‐lithography, ion Molding, underfill, screen printing, electrolytic techniques implantation, CVD, sputtering, plating, electro‐less plating, wirebonding, etching flip‐chip bumping, reflow, SMT Substrates Silicon and GaAs (III‐V) MLO, MLC, Hi‐res silicon and glass Metallization W, Al, and Cu in Si; Au in III‐V Ti, Cr, W, Ni, Pd, Cu, Pb, Sn, Ag, etc.. 1.1 ­Convergence in Communications and the Future, 5G Here, we discuss the convergence of communications, which occurred during the development of 3G around 2000 to 2003, followed by later refinements (termed 3.5G, 3.9G, and B4G). Lastly, future wireless communications, 5G, for example, as well as its goals and the technologies needed to achieve the goals, will be discussed. 1.1.1 From 1980 (1G) to 2010 (4G) In the 1980s, the first cellular phones by Motorola were all analog ones. These analog phones used the AMPS (advanced mobile phone system) cellular system developed by 0003388903.INDD 3 3/12/2018 6:47:53 PM 4 3D IC and RF SiPs: Advanced Stacking and Planar Solutions for 5G Mobility AT&T; they consumed more power, had shorter utility hours, and thus, they could not compete with the later digital GSM phones developed by the European community, represented by Nokia. The GSM phones, being digital, consumed less power, and quickly dominated the market. Motorola had to alter their courses of phone develop- ment, and thus ditched analog phones, and soon after adopted GSM and UMTS stand- ards, later termed 2G and 3G, respectively. Motorola’s analog phones are considered as 1G, retrospectively. Key features of 1G include 1) being analog in nature, 2) having a bandwidth (BW) of 30 kHz; note that human voices have a highest pitch of 20 KHz; and 3) carrying voice only. The 2G devel- opment span lasted over the entire 1990s: first it added GPRS (2.5G) and then EDGE (2.75G) capability along the way. 2G is digital in nature, and it carries voice and data (e.g., short message service, SMS). It had a BW of 200 kHz (124 channels share 25 MHz); for example, GSM900 (band 8) downlink band is between 935 MHz and 960 MHz. The original 2G carries only voices over the circuit‐switched (CS) networks (e.g., PSTN and POTS). GPRS added packet capability, extending the circuit switched only 2G to 2.5G, which includes packet switched (PS) networks (e.g., ethernet). 2.5G had a digital data rate of 144 kbps. IMT‐2000 under ITU‐R began in 1999. It set out to integrate GSM and UTRA (UMTS terrestrial radio access) into one global standard, UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System). The tasks were accomplished by 3GPP (the Third Generation Partnership Project) in releases: Rel 99 and Rels 4, 5, 6, and 7 roughly cor- respond to the calendar years (e.g., Release 4 in 2004). Thus, Rel 99 on W‐CDMA (wideband CDMA, which employs 5 MHz bandwidth), development Release 4 on TDD, Release 5 on HSDPA, Release 6 on HSUPA, and Release 7 on HSPA+.
Recommended publications
  • MOVR Mobile Overview Report April – June 2017
    MOVR Mobile Overview Report April – June 2017 The first step in a great mobile experience TBD 2 The first step in a great mobile experience TBD 3 The first step in a great mobile experience Q1 2017 to Q2 2017 Comparisons Top Smartphones Top Smartphones Africa Asia Europe N. America Oceania S. America • New to the list this Apple iPhone 5S 1.3% 2.9% 4.1% 3.5% 3.9% 3.1% quarter are the Apple Apple iPhone 6 2.2% 4.8% 5.6% 9.3% 10.1% 4.5% iPhone SE and the Apple iPhone 6 Plus 0.8% 2.4% 0.9% 3.7% 3.2% 1.0% Samsung J7 Prime. Apple iPhone 6S 1.7% 4.4% 6.3% 11.0% 13.9% 3.1% Apple iPhone 6S Plus 0.7% 2.6% 1.1% 6.1% 4.6% 0.9% • Dropping off the list Apple iPhone 7 1.2% 2.9% 4.0% 7.6% 9.3% 2.2% are the Motorola Moto Apple iPhone 7 Plus 0.7% 3.1% 1.3% 6.9% 6.2% 1.1% G4, Samsung Galaxy J2 Apple iPhone SE 0.3% 0.6% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 1.0% (2015), and the Huawei P8 Lite 2.2% 0.3% 2.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% Vodafone Smart Kicka. Motorola Moto G 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 2.1% Motorola Moto G (2nd Gen) 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 2.6% • North America and Motorola MotoG3 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 3.1% Oceania continue to be Samsung Galaxy A3 1.2% 0.9% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5% concentrated markets Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo 1.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% for brands, with the Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 0.9% 0.1% 3.5% top smartphones Samsung Galaxy J1 1.8% 0.6% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.8% accounting for 63.7% and 74.4% Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace 2.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Open APPLE THESIS FINAL__1 .Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY CHAIN AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPLY CHAIN AS A SWORD AND A SHIELD: LESSONS FROM APPLE LAUREN E. STERN SPRING 2013 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Supply Chain and Information Systems with honors in Supply Chain and Information Systems Reviewed and approved* by the following: Felisa Preciado Clinical Associate Professor of Supply Chain and Information Systems Thesis Supervisor John C. Spychalski Professor Emeritus of Supply Chain Management Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT In the past few decades, Apple has gone from being an incredible startup success story, to a company on the very brink of failure, to its current status as one of the most valuable and emulated companies in the world. It originally got its start through technological innovations, laser-like focus and a sometimes uncanny understanding for what consumers would want, and those things have certainly been constant themes during its periods of success. But one of the biggest reasons for its outstanding success in the past decade has been the way Apple has leveraged its supply chain both to control costs and to give it a competitive advantage unmatched by any of its competitors. This paper analyzes the Apple supply chain to try to identify the way in which Apple has taken advantage of its supply chain, adapted it to changes in the market, and used it as both a defensive and offensive competitive weapon to become one of the most successful and influential companies in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • H1 2015-2016 Results
    H1 2015-2016 Results November 2015 Safe Harbour Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbour provisions of the Private Securities litigation reform Act of 1995. By nature, forward looking statement represent the judgment regarding future events and are based on currently available information. Although the Company cannot guarantee their accuracy, actual results may differ materially from those the company anticipated due to a number of uncertainties, many of which the Company is not aware. For additional information concerning these and other important factors that may cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from expectations and underlying assumptions, please refer to the reports filed by the Company with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF). Soitec – H1 2015-2016 Results – November 2015 2 Agenda 1 Highlights 2 H1 2015-2016 Financial results 3 Outlook 4 Q&A Appendix: Electronics core business Soitec – H1 2015-2016 Results – November 2015 3 H1 2015-2016 - Core Business highlights Communication and Power – Demand remains robust for RF-SOI products in mobile applications; SOI content continues to grow within smartphones due to increased complexity (number of bands and performance) – Bernin 200mm-diameter wafer capacity is almost sold out for CY 2016 – Simgui (Chinese foundry) produced its first 200mm wafers in October 2015 and is now starting customers qualifications – Customers developing successfully 300mm wafers for RF - at least one major fabless and one foundry
    [Show full text]
  • Multiprocessing Contents
    Multiprocessing Contents 1 Multiprocessing 1 1.1 Pre-history .............................................. 1 1.2 Key topics ............................................... 1 1.2.1 Processor symmetry ...................................... 1 1.2.2 Instruction and data streams ................................. 1 1.2.3 Processor coupling ...................................... 2 1.2.4 Multiprocessor Communication Architecture ......................... 2 1.3 Flynn’s taxonomy ........................................... 2 1.3.1 SISD multiprocessing ..................................... 2 1.3.2 SIMD multiprocessing .................................... 2 1.3.3 MISD multiprocessing .................................... 3 1.3.4 MIMD multiprocessing .................................... 3 1.4 See also ................................................ 3 1.5 References ............................................... 3 2 Computer multitasking 5 2.1 Multiprogramming .......................................... 5 2.2 Cooperative multitasking ....................................... 6 2.3 Preemptive multitasking ....................................... 6 2.4 Real time ............................................... 7 2.5 Multithreading ............................................ 7 2.6 Memory protection .......................................... 7 2.7 Memory swapping .......................................... 7 2.8 Programming ............................................. 7 2.9 See also ................................................ 8 2.10 References .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • HEP Computing Trends
    HEP Computing Trends Andrew Washbrook University of Edinburgh ATLAS Software & Computing Tutorials 19th January 2015 UTFSM, Chile Introduction • I will cover future computing trends for High Energy Physics with a leaning towards the ATLAS experiment • Some examples of non-LHC experiments where appropriate • This is a broad subject area (distributed computing, storage, I/O) so here I will focus on the readiness of HEP experiments to changing trends in computing architectures • Also some shameless promotion of work I have been involved in.. Many thanks to all the people providing me with material for this talk! LHC Context Run 2 • Increase in centre of mass energy 13TeV • Increase in pile up from ~20 to ~50 • Increase in Trigger rate up to 1 KHz RAW to ESD • More computing resources required to Reconstruction reconstruct events Time High Luminosity LHC • HL-LHC starts after LS3 (~2022) • Aim to provide 300[-1 per year • Pileup of 150 expected • 200 PB/year of extra storage HL-LHC Timeline CPU Evolution • Die shrink getting smaller • Research down to 5nm depending on lithography and materials • Clock speed improvement has slowed • More cores per socket • Server at the Grid computing centre has at least 16 cores, typically more • Extrapolation from 2013 predicts 25% server performance improvement per year Processor scaling trends 1e+06 Transistors ● Clock Power ● Performance ● Performance/W ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ●●● ●● ●●●●● ● ● ●●●●● ●●●●●●●●● ●●●● ● ● ●●●● ●●●●●●●● ●●●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Cmos Finfet Structure On
    CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CMOS FINFET STRUCTURE ON SINGLE-EVENT EFFECTS { BASIC CHARGE COLLECTION MECHANISMS AND SOFT ERROR MODES By Patrick Nsengiyumva Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Electrical Engineering May 11, 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Lloyd W. Massengill, Ph.D. Michael L. Alles, Ph.D. Bharat B. Bhuva, Ph.D. W. Timothy Holman, Ph.D. Alexander M. Powell, Ph.D. © Copyright by Patrick Nsengiyumva 2018 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION In loving memory of my parents (Boniface Bimuwiha and Anne-Marie Mwavita), my uncle (Dr. Faustin Nubaha), and my grandmother (Verediana Bikamenshi). iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation work would not have been possible without the support and help of many people. First of all, I would like to express my deepest appreciation and thanks to my advisor Dr. Lloyd Massengill for his continual support, wisdom, and mentoring throughout my graduate program at Vanderbilt University. He has pushed me to look critically at my work and become a better research scholar. I would also like to thank Dr. Michael Alles and Dr. Bharat Bhuva, who have helped me identify new paths in my research and have been a constant source of ideas. I am also very grateful to Dr. W. T. Holman and Dr. Alexander Powell for serving on my committee and for their constructive comments. Special thanks go to Dr. Jeff Kauppila, Jeff Maharrey, Rachel Harrington, and Tim Haeffner for their support with test IC designs and experiments. I would also like to thank Dennis Ball (Scooter) for his tremendous help with TCAD models.
    [Show full text]
  • NC Sizemore,President
    Key articles..... A Clean Mac— Simple ways to banish grunge, dirt and dust bunnies from Next Monthly Meeting - Feb. 14, 2012, 7 PM your computer and peripherals— Using a Mac to Trace Your Family History, page 3. Bobby Adams, OMUG Member January 2012 Life After iWeb— What do you do now. What alternative website software is available— page 5. Everything you ever wanted to know about using the App Store presented in step-by-step style— page 6. February 2012 Hi All..... org/workshops/workshop_12.html and here: to learning about some new research tools (hope- The Christmas decorations are http://ocalamug.org/wp3/?page_id=181. fully free ones) myself. put away and dozens (it seems) One of the topics was “Using Text Edit as your As for me, I’m currently working my way of spring projects are upon me. primary word processor”. That is exactly what I am through “Steve Jobs” by Walter Isaacson. It is 571 I assume on you also. If you were in doing now as I write this message, and it is work- pages plus notes and references. I’m less than half the January meeting you no doubt ing great. TextEdit is doing everything I want it to way through and have found it to be a fascinating added to your spring “to do” list and it is easy to use. I save and transmit my files in story — almost stranger than fiction. I recommend with all the house cleaning and .rtf (rich text format) and have never had anyone it. You will find out a lot about Steve and about organizing tips Phil gave us.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carroll News
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected The aC rroll News Student 11-1-2012 The aC rroll News- Vol. 89, No. 8 John Carroll University Follow this and additional works at: http://collected.jcu.edu/carrollnews Recommended Citation John Carroll University, "The aC rroll News- Vol. 89, No. 8" (2012). The Carroll News. 998. http://collected.jcu.edu/carrollnews/998 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in The aC rroll News by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2012 election: The CN voter’s guide p. 10 – 11 THE Thursday,C NovemberARROLL 1, 2012 The Student Voice of John Carroll University N Since 1925 EWSVol. 89, No. 8 JCU feels effects of Sandy Grasselli grows up Ryllie Danylko whole inside wall, there are water spots, and Updates planned for the library Campus Editor [water is] dripping from the ceiling,” she said. Abigail Rings She and her roommate also found puddles of Staff Reporter Over the past few days, Superstorm Sandy water on top of their armoires. Grasselli Library and Breen Learning Center may be seeing has been wreaking havoc along the East Coast, Other Campion residents, sophomores Marie some updates to policies to make the library more accessible causing damage to vital infrastructures, school Bshara and Rachel Distler, had water leaking and useful to students. The updates will include everything from cancellations, widespread power outages and through their window during the storm. “Rachel whiteboards in the study rooms to a 24-hour room for student use.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 402 Evan Cheng Sr
    What's New in the LLVM Compiler Session 402 Evan Cheng Sr. Manager, Compilation Technologies These are confidential sessions—please refrain from streaming, blogging, or taking pictures Focused on Providing Best-in-Class Tools Focused on Providing Best-in-Class Tools Support for latest hardware Focused on Providing Best-in-Class Tools Support for latest hardware Improving performance Focused on Providing Best-in-Class Tools Support for latest hardware Improving performance Improving developer productivity Support for Latest Hardware armv7s Architecture • Architecture for Apple A6 processor ■ iPhone 5 and new iPads • Extensive tuning and optimization in the compiler ■ Uses instructions only available in armv7s armv7s Architecture • Architecture for Apple A6 processor ■ iPhone 5 and new iPads • Extensive tuning and optimization in the compiler ■ Uses instructions only available in armv7s Important for achieving max performance! armv7s Architecture • Already part of the standard architectures for iOS apps Intel AVX • 256-bit floating-point vector computation ■ Twice as wide as SSE vectors ■ Supported in Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge processors • Good for loops with operations that can be performed in parallel ■ Floating-point intensive ■ High ratio of computation to memory bandwidth Intel AVX2 • Supported in “Haswell” processors ■ Extend the AVX instruction set to integers ■ Adds fused multiply-accumulate for increased floating point throughput ■ More extensive set of vector shuffle instructions Using AVX2 with Fallback to AVX / SSE • Check
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Moore's Law and Faster General Purpose Computing, and A
    The End of Moore’s Law & Faster General Purpose Computing, and a Road Forward John Hennessy Stanford University March 2019 The End of an Era • 40 years of stunning progress in microprocessor design • 1.4x annual performance improvement for 40+ years ≈ 106 x faster (throughput)! • Three architectural innovations: • Width: 8->16->64 bit (~4x) • Instruction level parallelism: • 4-10 cycles per instruction to 4+ instructions per cycle (~10-20x) • Multicore: one processor to 32 cores (~32x) • Clock rate: 3 MHz to 4 GHz (through technology & architecture) • Made possible by IC technology: • Moore’s Law: growth in transistor count • Dennard Scaling: power/transistor shrinks as speed & density increase • Power = frequency x CV2 • Energy expended per computation was reducing Future processors 1 THREE CHANGES CONVERGE • Technology • End of Dennard scaling: power becomes the key constraint • Slowdown in Moore’s Law: transistors cost (even unused) • Architectural • Limitation and inefficiencies in exploiting instruction level parallelism end the uniprocessor era. • Amdahl’s Law and its implications end the “easy” multicore era • Application focus shifts • From desktop to individual, mobile devices and ultrascale cloud computing, IoT: new constraints. Future processors 2 UNIPROCESSOR PERFORMANCE (SINGLE CORE) Performance = highest SPECInt by year; from Hennessy & Patterson [2018]. Future processors 3 MOORE’S LAW IN DRAMS 4 THE TECHNOLOGY SHIFTS MOORE’S LAW SLOWDOWN IN INTEL PROCESSORS 10X Cost/transisto r slowing down faster, due to fab costs. Future processors 5 TECHNOLOGY, POWER, AND DENNARD SCALING 200 4.5 180 4 Technology (nm) 160 3.5 Energy/nm^2 140 3 120 2.5 100 2 80 1.5 60 Namometers 1 40 20 0.5 nm^2 per Power Relative 0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Power consumption Energy scaling for fixed task is better, since more & faster xistors.
    [Show full text]
  • Tmobile Device Matrix
    Device Portfolio Apple iPhone 5C Apple iPhone 5S Apple iPhone 6 Apple iPhone 6 Device Name 8 GB 16 GB 16GB Plus 16GB Image Up-Front Purchase Price: $449.76 $549.84 $649.92 $749.91 Monthly EIP Price: $18.74 $22.91 $27.08 $31.25 Device Size 2.33" x 4.90" x 0.35" 2.31" x 4.87" x 0.30" 2.64" x 5.44" x 0.27" 3.06" x 6.22" x 0.28" Display Size 4.0" 4.0" 4.7" 5.5" Weight 4.65 ounces 3.95 ounces 4.55 ounces 6.07 ounces Talk Time Up to 10 hours Up to 10 hours Up to 14 hours Up to 24 hours Standby Time Up to 10 days Up to 10 days Up to 10 days Up to 16 days Built-in, rechargeable, Built-in, rechargeable, Built-in, rechargeable, Built-in, rechargeable, Included Battery lithium-ion lithium-ion lithium-ion lithium-ion Charger Type Lightning Lightning Lightning Lightning Network Technology 2G, 3G, 4G, LTE 2G, 3G, 4G, LTE 2G, 3G, 4G, LTE 2G, 3G, 4G, LTE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, 17, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, 17, Operating Band 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 19, 20, 25 19, 20, 25 28, 29 28, 29 Part Number N/A N/A N/A N/A Operating System iOS 7 iOS 7 iOS 8 iOS 8 Apple A7 Dual Apple A6 Dual A8 processor with M8 A8 processor with M8 Processor Processor with M7 Processor co-processor co-processor motion co-processor Memory 8 GB Storage 16 GB Storage 16 GB Storage 16 GB Storage Micro SD Card Not supported Not supported Not supported Not supported Keyboard Type Touch Touch Touch Touch Wi-Fi Yes Yes Yes Yes Wi-Fi Calling Yes with iOS 8 update Yes with iOS 8 update Yes Yes Bluetooth Yes Yes Yes Yes Tethering Yes Yes Yes Yes Camera F: 1.2; R: 8.0 F: 1.2; R: 8.0 F: 1.2; R: 8.0 F: 1.2; R: 8.0 Media Player Yes Yes Yes Yes Text, IM & Email Yes Yes Yes Yes SIM Type Nano GBA Nano GBA Nano GBA Nano GBA CMAS, HD Voice, CMAS, HD Voice, CMAS, HD Voice, CMAS, HD Voice, Notes HAC M3/T4 HAC M3/T4 HAC M3/T4, VoLTE HAC M3/T4, VoLTE http://support.t- http://support.t- http://support.t- http://support.t- Full Specs List mobile.com/docs/DOC- mobile.com/docs/DOC- mobile.com/docs/DOC- mobile.com/docs/DOC- 9041 9042 16498 16500 SP - iOS Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Drive for Better Vision
    Drive for better vision 2011 Annual Report Dear Shareholders, 2011 was a year of transition for Himax as we made significant progress in expanding our sales and customer base for our small and medium-sized driver IC and non-driver businesses. The small-medium driver segment has become our single largest revenue contributor, overtaking the large panel driver business. Revenues from the non-driver businesses exceeded 10% of total revenues in 2011, also the first time in our history. Seeing strong fundamentals across many of our product lines, we are confident that we are in a position to deliver positive revenue and earnings growth in 2012. Our 2011 revenues totaled $633 million, representing a slight 1.5% decline from the previous year due to the drop-off in the large-panel driver category. This was mainly because of our loss of market share in one of our major customers who decided to diversify their driver IC supply base. However, we see significant growth opportunities in China, where panel manufacturers are aggressively expanding their large panel capacity. Small and medium-sized drivers grew strongly in 2011, thanks mainly to phenomenal demand in smartphones, which tend to require better displays and thus higher end driver ICs. We enjoy a strong position in the smartphone sector as a result of our leading technologies, competitive products and solid customer base. We expect the strong growth momentum for small and medium-sized drivers to continue into 2012, driven by growing markets such as smartphones, tablets and displays used in the automotive industry. Non-driver product sales increased even further in 2011 with several product segments experiencing significant shipment and revenue growth from last year.
    [Show full text]