Dietary Variation in the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat <Italic>(Tadarida

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dietary Variation in the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat <Italic>(Tadarida Above, some California grcivers are in- stalling bat houses on their farms to try to attract bats for pest control. Below, Mexican free-tailed bats, a common species in the Sacramento Valley, the underside of a bat box. Tzung-Su Ding o Steve Heydon Food habits of Mexican free-tailed Bats are predators of night-time flying pests, and a number of California bats and Yuma myotis bats were insects, including many that are agri- growers are installing bat houses on examined in the Sacramento Val- cultural pests (Tuttle 1988). For ex- their farms to try to attract bats for ley. Analyses of guano samples ample, big brown bats in the Midwest pest control (Tuttle and Hensley indicated that Mexican free-tailed favor cucumber beetles, June bugs, 1993). Nonetheless, there are few data on and Yuma myotis bats fed on stinkbugs and leafhoppers (Whitaker the food habits of bats in California; moths, water boatmen, beetles, 1995). Other species of bats primarily therefore, we do not knuw their poten- flies, midges, mosquitoes and feed on moths, the larvae of which tend to be crop pests. For example, tial impact on pests in our area. We plant bugs. The diet of Yuma McCracken (1996) found that Mexican need to assess the diet of bats on a lo- myotis bats tended to be diverse free-tailed bats feed extensively on mi- cal level, to understand their role as early in the season, but more grating populations of corn earworm predators in agricultural systems, be- uniform later on when they ate moths, a major pest of corn, tomatoes cause food habits vary with locality, more moths. In contrast, Mexican and beans. time of year, species of bat, time of free-tailed bats primarily fed on In terms of numbers of insects con- feeding and available insect prey. midges, flies and mosquitoes sumed, a typical colony of 150 bats The purpose of our research was to early in the season, then became will eat more than a million insects determine the food habits of Mexican more generalized feeders later each season (Whitaker 1995) and the free-tailed bats, Tadarida brasiliensis on. These data demonstrate that 20 million bats in Bracken Cave, Texas, and Yuma myotis bats, Myotis bats are beneficial as they feed eat about 250 tons of insects nightly. It yumanensis, in the Sacramento Valley. on insects that can be pests of seems clear that bats potentially can These two species commonly form agriculture. help protect growers from agricultural colonies in our area. e 8 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, VOLUME 52, NUMBER 1 Guano sampling moths (Lepidoptera),and a We determined food habits of few brown lacewings Mexican free-tailed-and Yuma myotis (Hemerobiidae). Early in the season 0 Brown lacewings bats in Yo10 County in 1995 by exam- 0 Plant bugs ining their fecal pellets. This method is from April to June, Beetles 0 Water boatmen a reliable way to assess what bats are Yuma myotis bats fed Moths 0 Flies, midges, feeding on, as all flying insects contain on a diversity of insects mosquitoes chitin, a substance mostly indigestible including water boat- to bats. As a result, insect parts such as men, moths, flies, mos- legs, wings and antennae can usually quitoes, midges, beetles, B o( I I I I I be identified to order, family and plant bugs, moths and a April May June July Aug. Sept. sometimes species. This technique is few brown lacewings much less destructive than earlier (fig. 2). By July, they Fig. 1. Mexican free-tailed bat diet, as determined by methods that involved killing bats and started feeding on more the percent volume of insects found in guano pellets. looking at stomach contents. The dis- moths, which accounted a,00 0 advantage to this method is that a few for 70% of their diet by 90 aE soft-bodied insects may be too di- September. 80 gested to identify in the samples. The frequency of in- g 70 0 Brown lacewings A colony of Mexican free-tailed bats sects found in the Mexi- 5 60 Plant bugs Beetles currently inhabits expansion joints in a can free-tailed and Yuma ,: 50 0 Water boatmen 40 0 Flies, midges, freeway overpass located directly myotis bat diets show -5 mosquitoes above a perennial stream that is sur- that they often select 30 Moths rounded by irrigated farmland. This is similar prey (figs. 3 and 2L 20 a large maternity colony with several 4). One exception is with 1 lo Lo thousand individuals. The Yuma water boatmen; Yuma April May June July Aug. Sept. myotis bats live in the folds of burlap myotis bats primarily fed sacks that hang in a rancher's barn, on these insects in April Fig. 2. Yuma myotis bat diet, as determined by the near irrigated and dryland farms. This whereas Mexican free- percent volume of insects found in guano pellets. colony is also a maternity colony, in- tailed bats fed on them in cluding several hundred individuals. July. This difference in We collected approximately 20 fecal feeding habits is probably due to the The Shannon-Weaver diversity pellets from drop cloths placed below temporal availability of these insects. index was used to measure and each colony about every 2 weeks from Water boatmen are strong flyers and compare the variability of prey April, when the bats arrived, until begin to disperse from water holes as found in the Mexican free-tailed September when they migrated out of they dry. This occurred earlier in the and Yuma myotis bat diet, based the valley for the winter. Insofar as season near the Yuma myotis bat on percent volume (fig. 5). The possible, we identified each food item roost, as this colony is located in a higher the diversity index, the and visually estimated its percentage dryland farming area. more general their diet becomes. volume in each pellet. Data were sum- marized by calculating the average percent volume of each insect group for each sample date. The frequency that bats fed on each insect group was determined by the number of pellets that contained a particular insect di- vided by the total number of pellets. Seasonal diet changes In April and May, about 85% of the 50 Mexican free-tailed bat's diet consisted of flies, mosquitoes (Cyclicidae) and 50- midges (Chironornidae) (fig. 1). From I 1 100 ' July until September, they became Flies, / more generalized in their feeding hab- 50 midges. its as they fed on plant bugs including 01 I I 1 0 ' mosquitoes I leafhoppers (Hemiptera), beetles in- cluding a few ground beetles Fig. 3. Frequency of insects found in the Fig. 4. Frequency of insects found in the (Carabidae), water boatmen (Corixidae), Mexican free-tailed bat diet. Yuma myotis bat diet. CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1998 9 tion and abundance of available prey posed to pulsed sounds. This may be (Kunz et al. 1995; Whitaker 1996). why some researchers saw a 50% re- However, assessment of prey available duction in damage to corn plots by to Mexican free-tailed bats is difficult corn borers when they broadcast bat- as these bats can forage up to 30 miles like ultrasound over test plots. These from their roosts and at altitudes up- moths are sensitive to bat echolocation wards of 2,400 feet. calls, and probably began to avoid the Yuma myotis bats usually roost and plots. forage near flowing water, and prima- Although bats are beneficial, they rily feed on aquatic insects such as are often maligned. In some cases, im- caddisflies, Trichoptera, and mayflies, portant roosting habitat has been de- Ephemeroptera (Brigham et al. 1992). stroyed and whole colonies elimi- They have also been shown to feed on nated. Bats are slow to reproduce, Dipterans and moths as we found in with most California species having our samples. We probably didn’t find only one young per year; they are also any caddisflies or mayflies in our vulnerable as many form colonies that samples as this colony is located about can be easily disturbed or destroyed. 8 miles from the nearest stream, pre- As a result, we need to protect current sumably beyond the colony’s normal colonies and develop ways to attract foraging range. more bats to farms. Although bats alone Both species of bats also fed on will not control agricultural pests, they brown lacewings and ground beetles, should be encouraged along with other indicating they will feed on beneficial naturally occurring predators, such as There are 26 bat species in California. Dif- insects. However, these insects made owls, raptors, and beneficial insects, to ferent species of bats have different feed- help diversify ecosystems and improve ing preferences. up a small percentage of their diet. Many beneficial insects are diurnal or biocontrol of pests. they have evolved ways to avoid pre- The diet of Mexican free-tailed bats dation by bats. For example, some R.F. Long is UC Cooperative Extension was more specific during April and adult green lacewings, Chrysopidae, Farm Advisor, Yolo and Solano counties; May, then became more general by which are most active at night, have T. Simpson is graduate student, Entomol- June. Conversely, the Yuma myotis bat ”bat-detectors” on their wings and ogy, UC Davis, T. Ding is graduate stu- diet tended to be more general early in drop to the ground when they detect dent, Agronomy, UC Davis, S. Heydon is the season, then more specific later in bat echolocations. They also emit a Senior Museum Scientist, Bokart Mu- the season. All the insects that these noxious odor, which makes them dis- seum, Entomology, UC Davis, and W.
Recommended publications
  • Mexican Free-Tailed Bat Tadarida Brasiliensis
    General Info MEXICAN FREE-TAILED BAT Also known as the Brazilian free- TADARIDA BRASILIENSIS tailed bat, it’s native to America especially Southern California. They move and migrate in huge numbers, only to a few locations. They are vulnerable to destroying habitats in spite of their species being low in abundance. They are in declining population in California which makes it a species of concern in the state. Fun Fact Area Where The They have the fastest This Bats Live: horizontal bats live year round speed of any in the areas of animal south west Unites reaching top States. ground speed of 160 km/h. Physical Features Nutrition On average they grow to 9 cm in They are insectivores and length and weight about 12.3 g. The they hunt their prey using average wingspan is 23 cm, their tail echolocation. Their diet accounts for most of their length. consists of moths, beetles, Their ears are close to their muzzle dragonflies, true bugs, and and eyes which are wide and set apart ants. Their pollination of which helps them find prey using sugarcane and their echolocation. Their wings are consumption of insects elongated with pointed tips, which that damage that sugar make them quick for straight flight canes are the reason some patterns. Their fur can be from dark alcohol companies have brown to gray. the bats as their icon in http://www.batcon.org/resources/media-education/bats- magazine/bat_article/656 Nicholas Roman Biology 12 Dr. Joanna their labels. .
    [Show full text]
  • Yuma Myotis Myotis Yumanensis
    Wyoming Species Account Yuma Myotis Myotis yumanensis REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: No special status USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Nongame Wildlife CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Cb), Tier III WYNDD: G5, S1 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS Yuma Myotis (Myotis yumanensis) has no additional regulatory status or conservation rank considerations beyond those listed above. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: There are six recognized subspecies of Yuma Myotis 1. Because of distributional uncertainties, it is unclear which subspecies occur in Wyoming. In general, the subspecies M. y. yumanensis occurs in the southern Rocky Mountains, while M. y. sociabilis occurs in the northern Rocky Mountains 1, 2. Description: Yuma Myotis may be difficult to identify in the field, even by skilled observers. The species is a small vespertilionid bat, but medium in size among bats in the genus Myotis. Pelage color is variable across the species’ range. Dorsal fur is short, dull, and varies from gray and brown to pale tan in color. Ventral fur is lighter in color, white or buffy. The ears, wing, and tail membranes are pale brown to gray 1. Males and females are identical in appearance, but females may be significantly larger than males in some populations 1. Juveniles are similar in appearance but can be differentiated from adults by the lack of ossified joints in the phalanges for the first summer 3, 4. Yuma Myotis is similar in appearance to other co-occurring Myotis species. Yuma Myotis can be distinguished from Long-legged Myotis (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Tadarida Fulminans – Malagasy Free-Tailed Bat
    Tadarida fulminans – Malagasy Free-tailed Bat T. fulminans are recognised (Skinner & Chimimba 2005). The three large Tadarida species are easily distinguished from other large Molossid species by their unwrinkled upper lips (Monadjem et al. 2010). Assessment Rationale Although the species has a very restricted range within the assessment region, being recorded only from the Pafuri region of Kruger National Park, it is widespread (although patchily distributed) elsewhere in Zimbabwe and East Africa. Because it occurs exclusively in a protected area, and there are no plausible threats within the assessment region or throughout its range, it does not qualify for Vulnerable D2. Its population size is unknown but is Ara Monadjem assumed to be stable inside Kruger National Park. Thus we list this species as Least Concern. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Regional population effects: It has a high wing loading National Red List status (2004) Not Evaluated (Monadjem et al. 2010), and thus we assume dispersal and rescue effects are possible. Reasons for change Non-genuine change: New information Distribution Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern This species ranges through East Africa, southern Africa TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None and a few localities on the island of Madagascar CITES listing None (Monadjem et al. 2016). It has been recorded from a number of regions in eastern and southeastern Africa, Endemic Edge of range along the border of Kenya and Uganda, as far south as Zimbabwe, central and northern Mozambique, southern The high-flying molossid Malagasy Free-tailed Malawi, the very northern reaches of South Africa, with an Bat (Tadarida fulminans) is unique amongst isolated record in northeast Zambia (Monadjem et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Bats: Brazilian Free-Tailed Bat1
    WEC379 Florida’s Bats: Brazilian Free-tailed Bat1 Holly K. Ober, Terry J. Doonan, and Emily H. Evans2 The Brazilian free-tailed bat (Figure 1) is found throughout Florida and is the state’s most common bat. With a wingspan of 12 inches (31 cm), it is a medium-sized bat. Fur color varies from dark brown to gray-brown. Brazilian free-tailed bats have long tails and wrinkled cheeks. Figure 2. Brazilian free-tailed bats can be found in every county throughout Florida. Figure 1. Brazilian free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis). Credits: Emily Evans Credits: Merlin Tuttle, Merlin Tuttle’s Bat Conservation http://www. merlintuttle.com/ In Florida, these bats roost (sleep during the day) primarily in man-made structures. They have been found roosting in Found throughout the southern United States, the species attics and sheds, under bridges (e.g., highway overpasses), has been seen throughout the entire state of Florida with under barrel roof tiles, and in bat houses. Less commonly the exception of the Florida Keys (Figure 2). They are they can be found roosting in palm trees. highly gregarious, living in large congregations. 1. This document is WEC379, one of a series of the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2016. Reviewed October 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. 2. Holly K. Ober, associate professor and wildlife Extension specialist, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Terry Doonan, mammal conservation coordinator, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; and Emily Evans, mammal conservation biologist, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Ecology of Bat Cave, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona
    R.B. Pape – Biology and ecology of Bat Cave, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. XX, no. X, p. 000–000. DOI: 10.4311/2012LSC0266 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF BAT CAVE, GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK, ARIZONA ROBERT B. PAPE Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, [email protected] Abstract: A study of the biology and ecology of Bat Cave, Grand Canyon National Park, was conducted during a series of four expeditions to the cave between 1994 and 2001. A total of 27 taxa, including 5 vertebrate and 22 macro-invertebrate species, were identified as elements of the ecology of the cave. Bat Cave is the type locality for Eschatomoxys pholeter Thomas and Pape (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and an undescribed genus of tineid moth, both of which were discovered during this study. Bat Cave has the most species-rich macro-invertebrate ecology currently known in a cave in the park. INTRODUCTION Cave. A review of cave-invertebrate studies in the park, which included 9 reports addressing 16 caves, was prepared This paper documents the results of a biological and by Wynne et al. (2007). Their compilation resulted in a list ecological analysis of Bat Cave on the Colorado River of approximately 37 species of cave macro-invertebrates within Grand Canyon National Park conducted during currently known from caves there. Wynne and others have four expeditions to the cave between 1994 and 2001. The recently performed invertebrate surveys in caves in the study focused on the macro-invertebrate elements present Grand Canyon–Parashant National Monument, and have in the cave and did not include any microbiological already encountered several undescribed cave-inhabiting sampling, identification, or analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita Kenneth T
    CURRICULUM VITA KENNETH T. WILKINS Personal Faculty office: Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798-7388 (254) 710-2911, FAX: (254) 710-2969 Administrative office: Graduate School, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798-7264 (254) 710-3588, FAX: (254) 710-3870 e-mail: [email protected] Education B.S., Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, 1974 M.S., Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1977 Ph.D., Zoology, University of Florida, 1982 Professional Experience Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, June 2006-present. Courses taught: Mammalogy, Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Biology, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured) and Interim Graduate Program Director (Biology), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, September 2003-May 2006. Courses taught: Mammalogy, Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Natural History, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, September 2000-2003. Courses taught: Mammalogy (taught in Waco and at Chapala Ecology Station in Mexico), Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Natural History, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of the Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, June 1998-2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants Will Be Assessed on Their Knowledge of Bats, With
    Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants will be assessed on their knowledge of bats, with an emphasis on North American Bats, South American Microbats, and African MegaBats. A TEAM OF UP TO: 2 APPROXIMATE TIME: 50 minutes 2. EVENT PARAMETERS: a. Each team may bring one 2” or smaller three-ring binder, as measured by the interior diameter of the rings, containing information in any form and from any source. Sheet protectors, lamination, tabs and labels are permitted in the binder. b. If the event features a rotation through a series of stations where the participants interact with samples, specimens or displays; no material may be removed from the binder throughout the event. c. In addition to the binder, each team may bring one unmodified and unannotated copy of either the National Bat List or an Official State Bat list which does not have to be secured in the binder. 3. THE COMPETITION: a. The competition may be run as timed stations and/or as timed slides/PowerPoint presentation. b. Specimens/Pictures will be lettered or numbered at each station. The event may include preserved specimens, skeletal material, and slides or pictures of specimens. c. Each team will be given an answer sheet on which they will record answers to each question. d. No more than 50% of the competition will require giving common or scientific names. e. Participants should be able to do a basic identification to the level indicated on the Official List. States may have a modified or regional list. See your state website.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Island Characteristics on Community Structure and Species
    ANABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATIONOF Winifred F. Frick for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science presented on February 16, 2007 . Title: Influences of Island Characteristics on Community Structure and Species Incidence of Desert Bats in a Near-shore Archipelago, Baja California, Mexico. Abstract approved: John P. Hayes Island biogeography has strongly influenced the study of biodiversity because archipelagos provide natural model systems for investigating patterns of diversity and the processes that shape ecological communities. I investigated the influence of area and isolation of islands (n = 32) in the Gulf of California, Mexico on patterns of richness, nestedness, and incidence of desert bats to determine factors important in shaping community structure and patterns of occurrence of bats in a naturally insular landscape. Species richness of bats was positively influenced by island size and declined with isolation from the Baja peninsula in two distinct subarchipelagos. Southern islands, which are associated with greater density of vegetation from summer rainfall, supported more species than dry, barren islands in the northern subarchipelago, suggesting that both area and habitat characteristics contribute to species richness of bats. Community composition of bats was nested by area and isolation, such that species found on smaller and more isolated islands were subsets of communities found on large, less isolated islands that harbored higher richness. The influences of area and isolation on community nestedness suggest species differ in immigration and persistence rates on islands. Bat communities were also nested at 27 sites in coastal habitat on the Baja peninsula, indicating that nestedness may occur in contiguous habitats that lack immigration and extinction filters.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tadarida Brasiliensis) Colony by Night Herons
    PREDATION AT AN URBAN FREE-TAILED BAT (TADARIDA BRASILIENSIS) COLONY BY NIGHT HERONS Authors: McSweeny, Timothy, and Brooks, Daniel M. Source: The Southwestern Naturalist, 64(1) : 60-63 Published By: Southwestern Association of Naturalists URL: https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909-64-1-60 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-Southwestern-Naturalist on 21 Feb 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Southwestern Association of Naturalists THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 64(1): 60–63 PREDATION AT AN URBAN FREE-TAILED BAT (TADARIDA BRASILIENSIS) COLONY BY NIGHT HERONS TIMOTHY MCSWEENY* AND DANIEL M. BROOKS Houston Museum of Natural Science, 5555 Hermann Park Drive, Houston, TX 77030-1799 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT—Harris County, Texas, is home to both species of North American night herons, black-crowned (Nycticorax nycticorax) and yellow-crowned (Nycticorax violacea).
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Yuma Myotis
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group YUMA MYOTIS Myotis yumanensis Family: VESPERTILIONIDAE Order: CHIROPTERA Class: MAMMALIA M023 Written by: J. Harris Reviewed by: P. Brown Edited by: S. Granhom, R. Duke DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The Yuma myotis is common and widespread in California. It is uncommon in the Mojave and Colorado Desert regions, except for the mountain ranges bordering the Colorado River Valley. Found in a wide variety of habitats ranging from sea level to 3300 m (11,000 ft), but it is uncommon to rare above 2560 m (8000 ft). Optimal habitats are open forests and woodlands with sources of water over which to feed. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUlREMENTS Feeding: Feeds on a wide variety of small flying insects found by echolocation. This species usually feeds over water sources such as ponds, streams, and stock tanks. Prey includes moths, midges, flies, termites, ants, homopterans, and caddisflies (Easterla and Whitaker 1972, Black 1974, Whitaker et al. 1977, 1981). The Yuma myotis is an efficient forager, sometimes returning to the roost with a full stomach 15 min after dusk (Barbour and Davis 1969). These bats respond to temporary patches of prey, such as ant swarms (Vaughan 1980), although many authors report that regular foraging routes are followed. Cover: The Yuma myotis roosts in buildings, mines, caves, or crevices. The species also has been seen roosting in abandoned swallow nests and under bridges. Separate, often more open, night roosts may be used. Reproduction: Maternity colonies of several thousand females and young may be found in buildings, caves, mines, and under bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • African Bat Conservation Species Guide to Bats of Malawi P a G E | 1
    African Bat Conservation Species Guide to Bats of Malawi P a g e | 1 Molossidae Free-tailed bats Chaerephon pumilus Little free-tailed bat Genus: Chaerephon Family: Molossidae Description Chaerophon pumilus is a small bat with a greyish-brown to dark brown pelage. The underparts are slightly paler than the upper parts. The wings are long, narrow and light brown coloured. A narrow white or cream band is usually present on the inner flanks where the wings join the body. Typical of the family Molossidae, the tail is not completely enclosed within the tail membrane and the upper lip is wrinkled, giving a bulldog appearance. Mature males have an erectile crest on the top of the head whilst the ears on both sexes are joined by a flap of skin. The interaural and muzzle area contains sebaceous glands secrete odours used in sexual discrimination. Distribution Chaerophon pumilus is a widespread and abundant in the eastern parts of the region, where is has been recorded from KwaZulu-Natal and Swaziland, through the Kruger National Park to Zimbabwe, northern Botswana, Zambia, Malawi, DRC and Mozambique. A geographically isolated population is restricted to Angola and the DRC west of the escarpment. Ecology Diet C. pumilus is an open-air forager. They feed on Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera and Blattodea. Reproduction After a 60-day gestation, a single young is born. There is a post-partum oestrus, which allow three births per year in the subregion. A third parturition event in May occurs in Malawi, and it can breed up to five times within a year in equatorial forest habitat.
    [Show full text]