DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk Review - Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk Review - Final Report Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk Review - Final Report IBE0600-Rp0001-F02/Dec 2011 rpsgroup.com/ireland Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk Review Final Report DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title Eastern CFRAM Study Document Title Flood Risk Review – Final Report Document No. IBE0600Rp0001 DCS TOC Text List of Tables List of Figures No. of This Document Appendices Comprises 1 3 43 1 1 5 Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date D01 Draft M Wilson M Brian Belfast 02-09-2011 D02 Draft Final M Wilson M Brian G Glasgow Belfast 30-09-2011 F01 Final M Wilson M Brian G Glasgow Belfast 04-11-2011 F02 Final M Wilson M Brian G Glasgow Belfast 22-12-2011 rpsgroup.com/ireland Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk Review – FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 DATA REVIEW & SITE INSPECTION PREPARATION ................................................................ 4 2.3 DATA COLLECTION............................................................................................................ 6 2.3.1 Local Authority Consultation............................................................................. 6 2.3.2 Site Inspections ................................................................................................ 7 2.3.3 Consultation with OPW Regional Drainage Maintenance Staff ..................... 10 2.3.4 Vulnerability of Environmental Receptors ...................................................... 10 2.3.5 Flood Risk Review.......................................................................................... 13 3 RESULTS OF THE FLOOD RISK REVIEW............................................................................ 15 3.1 CAVAN .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Mullagh ........................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Virginia............................................................................................................ 15 3.2 DUBLIN CITY.................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Clontarf ........................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2 Dublin City ...................................................................................................... 16 3.2.3 Raheny ........................................................................................................... 16 3.2.4 Santry ............................................................................................................. 16 3.3 DUNLAOGHAIRE-RATHDOWN ........................................................................................... 17 3.3.1 ESB Blackrock................................................................................................ 17 3.3.2 Loughlinstown................................................................................................. 17 3.3.3 Old Connaught/Wilford ................................................................................... 17 3.3.4 Shankill (Crinken) ........................................................................................... 18 3.4 FINGAL .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.4.1 Balrothery ....................................................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Bloody Stream (Howth) .................................................................................. 18 3.4.3 NUR Luttrells .................................................................................................. 19 3.4.4 Santry Demesne............................................................................................. 19 3.4.5 Sutton & Baldoyle........................................................................................... 19 3.4.6 Sutton & Howth North..................................................................................... 19 3.5 KILDARE ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.5.1 Ballymore Eustace ......................................................................................... 20 3.5.2 Blacktrench..................................................................................................... 20 3.5.3 Carragh........................................................................................................... 20 IBE0600Rp0001 i Rev F01 Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk Review – FINAL 3.5.4 Celbridge ........................................................................................................ 21 3.5.5 Clane .............................................................................................................. 21 3.5.6 Grange............................................................................................................ 21 3.5.7 Johnstown Bridge........................................................................................... 22 3.5.8 Johnstown ...................................................................................................... 22 3.5.9 Kilcock ............................................................................................................ 22 3.5.10 Kilcullen .......................................................................................................... 23 3.5.11 Kill................................................................................................................... 23 3.5.12 Leixlip ............................................................................................................. 23 3.5.13 ESB Longstone............................................................................................... 24 3.5.14 Maynooth........................................................................................................ 24 3.5.15 Naas ............................................................................................................... 24 3.5.16 Newbridge ...................................................................................................... 24 3.5.17 Roestown........................................................................................................ 25 3.5.18 Sallins ............................................................................................................. 25 3.5.19 Straffan ........................................................................................................... 25 3.5.20 Turnings.......................................................................................................... 25 3.6 LOUTH ........................................................................................................................... 26 3.6.1 Baltray ............................................................................................................ 26 3.6.2 Drogheda........................................................................................................ 26 3.6.3 Tullyallen ........................................................................................................ 26 3.7 MEATH........................................................................................................................... 27 3.7.1 Athboy ............................................................................................................ 27 3.7.2 Ballivor............................................................................................................ 27 3.7.3 N2 Balrath....................................................................................................... 28 3.7.4 ESB Grangeageeth ........................................................................................ 28 3.7.5 SCH Kilbride ................................................................................................... 28 3.7.6 Kildalkey ......................................................................................................... 28 3.7.7 Kilmessan....................................................................................................... 29 3.7.8 Longwood ....................................................................................................... 29 3.7.9 Mornington...................................................................................................... 29 3.7.10 Navan ............................................................................................................. 29 3.7.11 ESB Randalstown .......................................................................................... 30 3.7.12 Slane Bridge ................................................................................................... 30 3.7.13 WT Stalleen ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redaction Version Schedule 2.3 (Deployment Requirements) 2.3
    Redaction Version Schedule 2.3 (Deployment Requirements) 2.3 DEPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS MHC-22673847-3 Redaction Version Schedule 2.3 (Deployment Requirements) 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Schedule sets out the deployment requirements. Its purpose is to set out the minimum requirements with which NBPco must comply with respect to the deployment of the Network. 2 SERVICE REQUIREMENTS 2.1 NBPco is required throughout the Contract Period to satisfy and comply with all the requirements and descriptions set out in, and all other aspects of, this Schedule. 3 GENERAL NBPCO OBLIGATIONS 3.1 Without limiting or affecting any other provision of this Agreement, in addition to its obligations set out in Clause 14 (Network Deployment, Operation and Maintenance) and the requirements for Network Deployment set out in Paragraph 8 (Network Deployment – Requirements) of this Schedule and elsewhere in this Agreement, NBPco shall: 3.1.1 perform Network Deployment in accordance with the Implementation Programme, the Wholesale Product Launch Project Plan, the Network Deployment Plan, the Operational Environment Project Plan and the Service Provider Engagement Framework Project Plan so as to Achieve each Milestone by the associated Milestone Date; 3.1.2 perform such activities, tasks, functions, works and services as are necessary to perform Network Deployment in accordance with the Implementation Programme, the Wholesale Product Launch Project Plan, the Network Deployment Plan, the Operational Environment Project Plan and the Service Provider Engagement Framework Project
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix II – Ornithological Assessment 2017 Ecological Study
    Appendix II – Ornithological Assessment 2017 Ecological Study of Visitor Movement Areas ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYING AND MONITORING FOR THE WILD ATLANTIC WAY OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME for: Fáilte Ireland 88-95 Amiens Street Dublin 1 by: CAAS 1st Floor, 24-26 Ormond Quay, Dublin 7 February 2018 Appendix II - Ornithological Assessment for the 2017 Ecological Study of Visitor Movement Areas Environmental Surveying and Monitoring for the Wild Atlantic Way Operational Programme Table of Contents Section 1 Methodology & Rationale ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1. General Approach .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Timing..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Survey methods ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Sites Visited on the Wild Atlantic Way, 2017 ......................................................................... 2 Section 2 Galley Head, Co. Cork .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Site Description ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Survey ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Savills.Ie
    Development savills.ie Expressions of Interest Former N2 Road, Kilshane, Co. Dublin 13.47 hectares (33.28 acres) approximately FINGLAS M50 DUBLIN AIRPORT ROADSTONE LOGISTICS PARK The Subject Property N2/M2 For identification purposes only • Strategic location fronting on to former N2, adjacent M2 Motorway and within easy reach of M50 Motorway. • Level parcel of lands comprising 14.07 Hectares (34.77 Acres) approx. which has been partially developed with roads and services. • These lands have a positive planning history for a Recycling and Waste Management Facility. A Section 175 Development Consent was granted to Fingal County Council by An Bord Pleanala and the Environmental Protection Agency has issued a Waste Licence. Savills Ireland 32 Molesworth Street, Dublin 2 Jonathan Preston (01 618 1445) [email protected] Jill Horan (01 618 1350) [email protected] +353 (0) 1 618 1300 Robert Coakley (01 618 1411) [email protected] Dublin Airport Finglas Dublin Airport Logistics Park M50 Roadstone The Subject Property N2/M2 Approximate outline only Location Zoning This land bank is strategically located at the junction of the Under the Fingal Development Plan 2011-2017, the property former N2/M2 Motorway, the lands are within easy reach is zoned Objective “HI” Heavy Industry. The purpose of this of the M50 Motorway (Junction 5) providing easy access zoning is to facilitate opportunities for industrial uses, activity to Motorway network, Dublin Airport, Dublin City and and processes which may give rise to land use conflict other Tunnel. Nearby large commercial users include Roadstone’s zonings. “HI” zoned areas provide suitable and accessible Huntstown complex and the nearby Dublin Airport Logistics locations specifically for heavy industry and shall be reserved Park, where DHL and Easons have distribution centres.
    [Show full text]
  • En — 24.03.1999 — 003.001 — 1
    1985L0350 — EN — 24.03.1999 — 003.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 27 June 1985 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/ 268/EEC (Ireland) (85/350/EEC) (OJ L 187, 19.7.1985, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Council Directive 91/466/EEC of 22 July 1991 L 251 10 7.9.1991 ►M2 Council Directive 96/52/EC of 23 July 1996 L 194 5 6.8.1996 ►M3 Commission Decision 1999/251/EC of 23 March 1999 L 96 29 10.4.1999 Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 266, 9.10.1985, p. 18 (85/350/EEC) ►C2 Corrigendum, OJ L 281, 23.10.1985, p. 17 (85/350/EEC) ►C3 Corrigendum, OJ L 74, 19.3.1986, p. 36 (85/350/EEC) 1985L0350 — EN — 24.03.1999 — 003.001 — 2 ▼B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 27 June 1985 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Ireland) (85/350/EEC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Directive 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas( 1), aslastamended by Directive 82/786/EEC ( 2), and in particular Article 2 (2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3), WhereasCouncil Directive 75/272/EEC of 28 April 1975 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within
    [Show full text]
  • NASCO Rivers Database Report by Jurisdiction
    NASCO Rivers Database Report By Jurisdiction Photos courtesy of: Lars Petter Hansen, Peter Hutchinson, Sergey Prusov and Gerald Chaput Printed: 17 Jan 2018 - 16:24 Jurisdiction: Canada Region/Province: Labrador Conservation Requirements (# fish) Catchment Length Flow Latitude Longitude Category Area (km2) (km) (m3/s) Total 1SW MSW Adlatok (Ugjoktok and Adlatok Bay) 550218 604120 W N Not Threatened With Loss 4952 River Adlavik Brook 545235 585811 W U Unknown 73 Aerial Pond Brook 542811 573415 W U Unknown Alexis River 523605 563140 W N Not Threatened With Loss 611 0.4808 Alkami Brook 545853 593401 W U Unknown Barge Bay Brook 514835 561242 W U Unknown Barry Barns Brook 520124 555641 W U Unknown Beaver Brook 544712 594742 W U Unknown Beaver River 534409 605640 W U Unknown 853 Berry Brook 540423 581210 W U Unknown Big Bight Brook 545937 590133 W U Unknown Big Brook 535502 571325 W U Unknown Big Brook (Double Mer) 540820 585508 W U Unknown Big Brook (Michaels River) 544109 574730 W N Not Threatened With Loss 427 Big Island Brook 550454 591205 W U Unknown NASCO Rivers Database Report Page 1 of 247 Jurisdiction: Canada Region/Province: Labrador Conservation Requirements (# fish) Catchment Length Flow Latitude Longitude Category Area (km2) (km) (m3/s) Total 1SW MSW Big River 545014 585613 W N Not Threatened With Loss Big River 533127 593958 W U Unknown Bills Brook 533004 561015 W U Unknown Birchy Narrows Brook (St. Michael's Bay) 524317 560325 W U Unknown Black Bay Brook 514644 562054 W U Unknown Black Bear River 531800 555525 W N Not Threatened
    [Show full text]
  • Sallins Parish Church
    Newsletter spread 10/08/05 12:58 pm Page 1 SUMMER 2005 Welcome to Sallins Parish A Brief History of Sallins Parish Previous to 1972 the canal formed the boundary between When change came to the parish in the mid 1990’s it Everyone living in Sallins is very Naas and Kill parishes.This left Sallins Church and school came in a dramatic way. New housing estates suddenly conscious that it is growing rapidly: in Naas parish while all of the houses north of the canal and sprung up, the railway station re-opened after over thirty so rapidly that it is hard to keep in the surrounding area were in Kill parish. In response to pace with the changes. Often, it years closure and suddenly Sallins was no longer a village. the wishes of many people in Sallins and in order to ratio- In 1993 ten children were baptised in Sallins, in 2004 the seems, we do not have the time or nalise the situation, Bishop Lennon established the new number was eighty nine. The sudden surge in population opportunity to say welcome to parish of Sallins in December 1972. The townslands of put pressure on the school. An extension of seven rooms people as they move in. Osberstown and Monread North were taken from Naas parish, the townsland of Waterstown from Caragh and the was approved in 1999 but by the time building began in Accordingly I am delighted to townslands of Sallins, Castlesize, Bodenstown, Lady Hill, 2004 it was no longer sufficient. Approval has now been introduce this welcome and infor- Little Rath, Daars North, Shortwood, Daars South, given for a further eight classrooms.The parish will eventu- mation newsletter on Sallins Prospect, Sherlockstown, Sherlockstown Common to the ally have a twenty four classroom school with 720 pupils.
    [Show full text]
  • 309/R309405.Pdf, .PDF Format 246KB
    Inspector’s Report ABP-309405-21 Development Construction of a 30 metre lattice tower enclosed within a 2.4 metre high palisade fence compound. Location Corgullion Townland, Carrick on Shannon, Co Roscommon. Planning Authority Roscommon County Council Planning Authority Reg. Ref. PD/20/473 Applicant(s) Cignal Infrastructure Limited Type of Application Permission Planning Authority Decision Refuse Type of Appeal First-Party Appellant(s) Cignal Infrastructure Limited Observer(s) None Date of Site Inspection 13th April 2021 Inspector Stephen Ward ABP-309405-21 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 19 1.0 Site Location and Description The appeal site is located is the rural townland of Corgullion, Co. Roscommon, at a distance of c. 4km southeast of Carrick-On-Shannon and c. 4km southwest of Drumsna. The Sligo – Dublin Railway line runs east to west at c. 100m to the north of the site. Further north of this is the River Shannon, which forms part of the Leitrim – Roscommon county border. The Flagford – Arva – Louth 220kv power lines also sun in an east-west direction at a distance of c. 250 metres south of the site. The wider surrounding area is otherwise characterised by undulating agricultural land interspersed by one-off houses. The site comprises a relatively flat linear section which is to be annexed along the northern boundary of a larger agricultural holding. It has a stated area of 1,104m2, with an overall length of c. 310m and a width of 3m for the vast majority of that length. The northern and western site boundaries adjoin the existing field boundaries, which are comprised of trees and hedgerows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rivers of Borris County Carlow from the Blackstairs to the Barrow
    streamscapes | catchments The Rivers of Borris County Carlow From the Blackstairs to the Barrow A COMMUNITY PROJECT 2019 www.streamscapes.ie SAFETY FIRST!!! The ‘StreamScapes’ programme involves a hands-on survey of your local landscape and waterways...safety must always be the underlying concern. If WELCOME to THE DININ & you are undertaking aquatic survey, BORRIS COMMUNITY GROUP remember that all bodies of water are THE RIVERS potentially dangerous places. MOUNTAIN RIVERS... OF BORRIS, County CARLow As part of the Borris Rivers Project, we participated in a StreamScapes-led Field Trip along the Slippery stones and banks, broken glass Dinin River where we learned about the River’s Biodiversity, before returning to the Community and other rubbish, polluted water courses which may host disease, poisonous The key ambitions for Borris as set out by the community in the Borris Hall for further discussion on issues and initiatives in our Catchment, followed by a superb slide plants, barbed wire in riparian zones, fast - Our Vision report include ‘Keep it Special’ and to make it ‘A Good show from Fintan Ryan, and presentation on the Blackstairs Farming Futures Project from Owen moving currents, misjudging the depth of Place to Grow Up and Grow Old’. The Mountain and Dinin Rivers flow Carton. A big part of our engagement with the River involves hearing the stories of the past and water, cold temperatures...all of these are hazards to be minded! through Borris and into the River Barrow at Bún na hAbhann and the determining our vision and aspirations for the future. community recognises the importance of cherishing these local rivers If you and your group are planning a visit to a stream, river, canal, or lake for and the role they can play in achieving those ambitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Locks and Bridges on Ireland's Inland Waterways an Abundance of Fixed
    ack eachers Resource P ways – Primary School T All About Water Locks and Bridges on Ireland’s Inland Waterways Ireland’s inland waterways boast an abundance of fixed and moveable bridges as well as offering a variety of locks to experience as you journey along the different waterways. Did you know? Did you know? The locks on the Shannon Navigation and the Shannon- Locks vary in size and depth Erne Waterway are hydraulically e.g. the length of the lock on operated while the locks along the Erne System is 36mtrs and the other navigations are 1.2mtrs deep. The length of a manually operated. lock on the Shannon Navigation is 29.2mtrs and 1.35mtrs deep. Ballinamore Lock im aterway this Lock . Leitr Located on the Shannon-Erne W n in Co ck raulic lock operated by boat users gh Alle ulic lo lock is a hyd Drumshanbon Lou ydra ugh the use of a smart card cated o ock is a h thro Lo anbo L eeper rumsh ock-K D ed by a L operat The Grand Canal 30th Lock Did you know? Located on the Grand Canal the 30th Lock is operated manually through the use of a lock A lock is a device for raising key and lowering boats between stretches of water of different levels on rivers and canals. Activity Arrange a visit to your nearest lock and find out the following information: a. The name of the lock? b. Is it a manual or automated lock? c. How old is the lock? d.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Infrastructure
    Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 CHAPTER 7: INFRASTRUCTURE SECTIONS IN THIS CHAPTER 7.1 Transportation-Introduction 7.2 Goals 7.3 Roads 7.4 Pedestrians and Cyclists 7.5 Public Transport 7.6 Park & Ride, Parking, Loading & Taxi Ranks 7.7 Street Furniture & Lighting 7.8 Keeping the Street Clean 7.9 Water Supply & Sewerage Treatment & Disposal 7.10 Flooding 7.11 Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems 7.12 Telecommunications 7.13 Broadband 7.14 Solid Waste Collection & Disposal 7.15 Energy 161 Navan Development Plan 2009-2015 November 2009 7.1 Transportation-Introduction The context for this chapter is provided in Chapter Two of this Development Plan. The key to Navan’s sustainable growth is the development of an integrated land use and transportation system which provides for a development pattern that protects Navan’s architectural and natural heritage while providing for growth and economic development. The integration of land use and transportation policies, both in the town centre and outer suburban areas underpins the transportation strategy as outlined below. 7.2 Goals It is the goal of Navan Town Council and Meath County Council to create vibrant urban areas with good provision of public transport, reduced traffic congestion and an attractive urban centre, which is not dominated by the car. It is the main objective of the Planning Authorities to create an integrated and environmentally sound system, with particular emphasis on: Accessibility and choice of transport for all; Strong integration between transportation planning
    [Show full text]
  • Slieve Bloom Walks Broc 2020 Proof
    Tullamore 2020 Slieve Bloom Walking Festival N52 Day Name of Walk Meeting Point Time Grade Distance Duration Leader N80 Sat02-May Capard Woodlands Clonaslee Community Centre 10:30 B 10k 4 hrs Martin Broughan Kilcormac R421 d n Sat Two Rivers/Glendinoregan Clonaslee Community Centre 10:45 A 10k 4 hrs John Scully R422 Clonaslee e N52 Rosenallis Sat Brittas Lake and Woodlands Clonaslee Community Centre 10:30 C 8k 3 hrs Gerry Hanlon Cadamstown Glenbarrow Car Park eek P Sat Spink Mountain Clonaslee Community Centre 11:00 B 8k 4 hrs Richard Jack R440 W Mountmellick Ridge of Cappard Sun03-May Pauls Lane/Silver River Kinnity Community Centre 11:00 C 8k 2 hrs Gerry Hanlon Birr Kinnitty Car Park P N80 Walks 2020 Sun Cumber Hill Kinnity Community Centre 10:30 A 10k 4 hrs John Scully R440 Ballyfin Sun Clear Lake Kinnitty Community Centre 10:45 B 7k 3 hrs Sonja Cadogan R421 Slieve Blm www.fb.com/SlieveBloomOutdoors N62 Camross Portlaoise Sun Kinnitty Woodlands Kinnitty Community Centre 12:30 B 9k 3-4 hrs Richard Jack Muntins N7 Mountrath May Holiday Mon04-May Kinnitty at Dawn Kinnitty Community Centre 06:00 C 6k 2-3 hrs Richard Jack Mon Fearbreague Kinnitty Community Centre 11:00 A 10k 4 hrs Gerry Hanlon Roscrea N7 Borris-in-Ossory BELFAST Eco Walking Weekend 4th-5th July 2020 KNOCK The Slieve Bloom Mountains Day Name of Walk Meeting Point Time Grade Distance Duration Leader DUBLIN - in the Heart of Ireland- SHANNON Sat04-Jul Clonaslee Woodlands Clonaslee Community Centre 11:00 B 12k 4 hrs John Scully ROSSLARE y l WALKERS PLEASE NOTE CORK Ju Sun05-Jul Sillver River Cadamstown Car Park 11:00 B 10k 4 hrs John Scully • Registration takes place prior to start of each walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Auths Issued and Not Revoked
    Authorisations to Construct issued Report Generated on: 02 July 2014 Type Company Name Address Ref Auth Power Station Address Size (MW) Issue Date Biomass Kerry County Council Aras an Chontae Rathass Tralee Co. Kerry Auth 2001/11-15 North Kerry Landfill, Kerry 1.0 26/07/2002 Muingnaminnane, Tralee Wexford County Council County Hall Spawell Road Co. Wexford Auth 2001/11-12 Killurin Landfill, Crossabeg Wexford 1.0 12/08/2002 Irish Softfoods Limited SWS Group, Shinagh House, Bandon, Co. Cork Auth 2003/04-32 Derrigra, Enniskeane Cork 1.8 14/10/2003 (Independent Biomass Systems) CCGT Dublin Bay Power 26 Upper Pembroke Street Dublin 2 Auth 2000/01-01 Pigeon House Road, Dublin 408.0 24/04/2000 Ringsend Huntstown Power Mill House Ashtown Gate Navan Road Dublin 15 Auth 2000/06-07 Huntstown & Johnstown, Dublin 343.0 23/08/2000 Company Ltd Finglas, Dublin 11 Tynagh Energy Limited The Crescent Building, Northwood Park, Santry, Dublin 9 Auth 2003/10-01 Derryfranch, Tynagh, Galway 404.0 11/12/2003 (Homemount Limited) Viridian Power Limited Mill House Ashtown Gate Navan Road Dublin 15 Auth 2003/09-01 Mill House, Ashtown Gate, Dublin 396.7 16/07/2004 Navan Road Electricity Supply Board 27 Lower Fitzwilliam Street Dublin 2 Auth 2006/01-02 Ballincarroonig, Whitegate, Cork 431.6 29/03/2007 Midleton Bord Gáis Eireann PO Box 51 Gasworks Road Co. Cork Auth 2007/07-01 ConocoPhillips Oil Refinery, Cork 445.0 27/08/2007 Corkbeg, Whitegate SSE Generation Ireland 3 Grand Canal Plaza 5th Grand Canal St Upr D4 Auth 2010/08-02 Great Island, Camplie, New Wexford 469.0 22/10/2010 Limited Floor Ross CCP Johnson & Johnson Vision Janssen Pharmaceuticals Little Island Co.
    [Show full text]