DOCSLIB.ORG

Gloucestershire Waste & Recycling Collections Benchmarking

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gloucestershire Waste & Recycling Collections Benchmarking Gloucestershire Waste & Recycling Collections Benchmarking Collection Schemes Cost of Dry Residual Food Garden garden Dry scheme Local Authority Container scheme waste waste waste waste type Card Cans Glass frequency frequency Paper frequency frequency service per year Plastic Bottles Mixed plastics Cotswold Box 35-60 litres, Multi-stream Fortnightly Fortnightly Y Y Y Y Y Y Weekly Weekly £30 District Council Reusable Sack Cheltenham Box 35-60 Litres, Multi-Stream Fortnightly Fortnightly Y Y Y Y Y Y Weekly Fortnightly £42 Borough Council Householder Provided Carrier Bag, Reusable Sack Forest of Dean Box 35-60 Litres, Multi-Stream Weekly Fortnightly Y Y Y Y N Y Weekly Fortnightly £30 District Council Householder Provided Carrier Bag, Reusable Sack Gloucester City Box 35-60 Litres, Multi-Stream Weekly Fortnightly Y Y Y Y Y Y Weekly Fortnightly £42 Council Reusable Sack Stroud District Box 35-60 Litres, Two Stream Fortnightly Fortnightly Y Y Y Y Y Y Weekly Fortnightly £39 Council Reusable Sack, (paper and Wheeled Bin 181- card separate) 240 Litres Tewkesbury Wheeled Bin 181- Co-mingled Fortnightly Fortnightly Y Y Y Y Y Y Weekly Fortnightly £45 Borough Council 240 Litres Kerbside Dry Recycling Yields 140.0 120.0 100.0 80.0 kg/hh/yr 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 Paper Card Mixed Paper and Card Glass Metals Plastics Cotswold District Council Cheltenham Borough Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Average Kerbside Dry Recycling Yields 250 200 150 kg/hh/yr 215.0 213.2 100 192.0 169.8 159.7 140.8 50 0 Cotswold District Cheltenham Borough Forest of Dean District Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Council Council Council Household Residual Waste (collected from kerbside) 500 450 400 350 300 250 438.1 200 374.2 kg/hh/yr 355.0 346.5 150 315.4 228.7 100 50 0 Cotswold District Cheltenham Borough Forest of Dean District Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Council Council Council Food Waste Yields 120 100 80 60 kg/hh/yr 109.7 92.3 40 74.3 76.6 59.3 58.9 20 0 Cotswold District Cheltenham Borough Forest of Dean District Gloucester City Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Council Council Council Council Garden Waste Yields 300 250 200 150 kg/hh/yr 254.0 100 195.5 153.9 50 96.9 103.7 56.7 0 Cotswold District Cheltenham Borough Forest of Dean Gloucester City Stroud District Tewkesbury Borough Council Council District Council Council Council Council Garden Waste Service Analysis Annual charge Number of Proportion of Tonnes Yield per for service subscribers households collected subscriber subscribing Cotswold District Council £30 23,645 10,572 447.1 43% Cheltenham Borough Council £42 16,848 5,298 314.4 41% Forest of Dean District Council £30 15,800 7,368 466.3 42% Gloucester City Council £42 19,000 5,818 306.2 34% Stroud District Council £39 10,350 2,951 285.1 20% Tewkesbury Borough Council £45 15,000 6,021 401.4 38% Garden Waste Yield per Subscriber 500 450 400 350 300 250 466.30 kg/mm/yr 447.10 200 401.40 314.40 150 306.20 285.10 100 50 0 Cotswold District Cheltenham Forest of Dean Gloucester City Stroud District Tewkesbury Borough Council Borough Council District Council Council Council Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
    GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National
    [Show full text]
  • Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Referendum Version October 2017
    Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Referendum Version October 2017 1 Neighbourhood Plan Area – designated 1st August 2013 Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan Referendum Version October 2017 2 FOREWORD. Welcome to the Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan. The Tetbury Neighbourhood Plan Working Group have carried out a huge amount of work to produce this Neighbourhood Plan which encompasses all the key planning issues that will affect the town in the future. Neighbourhood Plans are a new type of planning document following on from The Localism Act (2011) which introduced Neighbourhood Development Plans as policies that focus on local planning and give communities the opportunity to become involved in their future. For some years now Tetbury has been discussing what shape the town should take into the future, ‘Planning for Real’ was probably the first public consultation that gave townspeople the opportunity to describe their forward vision and following this there have been a number of public consultations and workshops that have contributed to the content of this plan. Discussions have also taken place with planning professionals, landowners, developers, local organisations, local health professionals, neighbouring parish councils and the District Council. The proposals that result from these discussions are in this document and they will determine the way that our town can develop into the future. The Tetbury community now has a chance to approve the plan in a referendum. Tetbury Town Council is very grateful for the huge amount of work carried out by the Neighbourhood Plan Working Group without their commitment and dedication we would not have such a quality document that reflects joint working between many local organisations and the community consultations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy In
    The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire March 2019 the gloucestershire agrifood and rural economy final report.docx March 2019 The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 Gloucestershire’s Agriculture and Food Sector .......................................................................... 6 UK & Global Context .............................................................................................................. 6 The Scale of Gloucestershire Agriculture and pre Consumer Food Chain .............................. 8 The Consumer End of the Gloucestershire Food Chain .........................................................15 Non Farming Enterprises and diversification..........................................................................16 Major Companies in the Gloucestershire Agricultural, Food & Drink Sector ...........................18 The ‘End to End’ Food Chain .................................................................................................19 Gloucestershire’s Rural Economy .............................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    FOREST OF DEAN DISTRICT COUNCIL 2011 Air Quality Progress Report for Forest of Dean District 2011 In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management Chris J Ball Local Authority Officer Environmental Protection & Licensing Officer Department Environmental Protection & Licensing Forest of Dean District Council Address Council Offices High Street Coleford Gloucestershire GL16 8HG Telephone 01594 812429 E-mail [email protected] Report Reference number 2011AQPR Date May 2011 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Forest of Dean District Council Air Quality Progress Report 2011 Executive Summary The 2011 Progress Report provides an update on the air quality issues affecting Forest of Dean district, including results of pollutant monitoring and information on new residential, industrial and transport developments that might affect air quality in the district. In 1995, the Environment Act provided for a National Air Quality Strategy requiring local authorities to carry out Reviews and Assessments of the air quality in their area for seven specific pollutants. These are; carbon monoxide (CO), benzene, 1, 3-butadiene, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), lead, sulphur dioxide (SO2) and PM10 (Particles under 10μm in diameter). This Air Quality Progress Report concluded the following: Five sites in the town of Lydney exceeded the nitrogen dioxide annual mean objective of 40μg/m3. These sites are within the Lydney Air Quality Management Area, which was declared in July 2010. No other pollutants exceeded their respective annual mean concentrations. There are no other road traffic sources of concern within Forest of Dean District Council‟s administrative area. There are no other transport sources of concern within Forest of Dean District Council‟s administrative area.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotswold District Council Business Delivery Plan August 2017
    Cotswold District Council Cotswold District Council Business Delivery Plan August 2017 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Economic Evidence and policy ....................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Cotswold District – Economic overview .......................................................................................... 4 Cotswold Site and Employment Land Analysis ............................................................................... 8 Main Conclusions from the Stakeholder Consultation ................................................................. 17 3. Achieving the growth ambitions – key themes............................................................................. 22 Achieving the growth ambitions – Key Themes ............................................................................ 23 4. Priorities and delivery options for the economic strategy ........................................................... 28 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 29 Strategic Priorities ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Spending Plans 2021 to 2022
    FOREST OF DEAN DISTRICT COUNCIL SPENDING PLANS 2021-22 The level of council tax Council tax is the main source of locally-raised income for this authority and is used to meet the difference between the amount a local authority wishes to spend and the amount it receives from other sources such as business rates and government grants. In determining the level of council tax payable, the Cabinet has borne in mind the difficult economic and financial climate that many of our residents face, although our funding from Central Government has declined sharply during the period 2010 to 2021 (although there has been increased funding in 2020-2021 to help with the impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic), with uncertainty over future funding levels after March 2022. With this in mind, the Council has to consider what level of increase in council tax is sustainable, without creating an increased risk of service cuts and/or larger tax increases in the future. The average council tax you will pay for services provided by the District Council is £189.03 for a Band D taxpayer equating to £3.64 per week. This is an increase of £5.00 over last year, equating to less than 10 pence per week. Service delivery The Council aims to maintain the delivery and high standard of its services to residents, protecting front line services within the reduced funding available. The Council has no funding gap in 2021-22 although we have increased costs, the continued impact of low interest rates on investment income, impact of Covid-19 Pandemic as well as additional government support throughout the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Interest How to Use This Map Key Why Cycle?
    76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 How to use this map Key The purpose of this map is to help you plan your route Cycleability gradations, in increasing difficulty 16 according to your own cycling ability. Traffic-free paths and pavements are shown in dark green. Roads are 1 2 3 4 5 graded from ‘quieter/easier’ to ‘busier/more difficult’ Designated traffic-free cycle paths: off road, along a green, to yellow, to orange, to pink, to red shared-used pavements, canal towpaths (generally hard surfaced). Note: cycle lanes spectrum. If you are a beginner, you might want to plan marked on the actual road surface are not 15 your journey along mainly green and yellow roads. With shown; the road grading takes into account the existence and quality of a cycle lane confidence and increasing experience, you should be able to tackle the orange roads, and then the busier Canal towpath, usually good surface pinky red and darker red roads. Canal towpath, variable surface Riding the pink roads: a reflective jacket Our area is pretty hilly and, within the Stroud District can help you to be seen in traffic 14 Useful paths, may be poorly surfaced boundaries, we have used height shading to show the lie of the land. We have also used arrows > and >> Motorway 71 (pointing downhill) to mark hills that cyclists are going to find fairly steep and very steep. Pedestrian street 70 13 We hope you will be able to use the map to plan One-way street Very steep cycling routes from your home to school, college and Steep (more than 15%) workplace.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Lca Report Chap1-4.Qxp
    GLOSSARY 9.0 Key Landscape Character Assessment Terms Metalworking technology and new types of flint tool and pottery design were introduced at the start of this period. Changes in Analysis: The process of dividing up the landscape into its society were reflected in the emergence of new burial techniques, component parts to gain a better understanding of it. particularly round barrows. In the Middle Bronze Age cremation replaced inhumations and in the late Bronze Age social and Approach: The step-wise process by which landscape assessment economic changes led to the abandonment of old funerary rights in is undertaken. favour of less traceable rites. Assessment: Term to describe all the various ways of looking at, Combe: A topographic term used in place names which in the analysing, evaluating and describing the landscape. chalklands of southern England, refers to the head of a dry valley Character: A distinct, recognisable and consistent pattern of which terminates in a steep sided amphitheatre. It is also elements in the landscape that makes one landscape different from applicable to the limestone topography of the Cotswolds another, rather than better or worse. Cornbrash: Name applied to the uppermost member of the Characteristics: Elements or combinations of elements, which Bathonian stage of the Middle Jurassic formation in England. It is make a particular contribution to distinctive character. an old English agricultural name applied in Wiltshire to a variety of loose rubble or 'brash' which, in that part of the country, forms a Characterisation: The process of identifying areas of similar good soil for growing corn. The name was adopted by William character, classifying and mapping them and describing their Smith for a thin band of shelly stone which, in the south of character.
    [Show full text]
  • Coopers Edge Boundary Information
    This area comes under Hucclecote Parish This area Council and comes under Tewkesbury Brockworth Borough Parish Council Council and Tewkesbury Borough Council This area comes under Upton St Leonards Parish Council and Stroud District Council The Coopers Edge development is shared between 3 parish councils and 2 district councils. The map above shows how the parish boundaries intersect through the development, and 2 of the parishes fall into the Tewkesbury Borough Council authority, and 1 parish falls into Stroud District Council authority. Your parish council is responsible for things like parks and play areas, burial grounds, community facilities, allotments and comments on planning applications and is consulted on policies that the Borough and County Councils implement. The district or borough councils deal with things like bins, planning, benefits and much more. Gloucestershire County Council covers the whole of Coopers Edge and they are responsible for roads, transport, public rights of way, education, and so on. Contacts: Brockworth Parish Council Community Centre Tewkesbury Borough Council Court Road Council Offices Brockworth Gloucester Road Gloucester GL3 4ET Tewkesbury GL20 5TT Email: [email protected] Website: www.brockworth-pc.gov.uk Tel: 01684 295010 Tel: 01452 863123 Website: www.tewkesbury.gov.uk Hucclecote Parish Council Stroud District Council Pineholt Village Hall, Bird Road, Ebley Mill Hucclecote Stroud GL3 3SN GL5 4UB Website: www.hucclecotepc.gov.uk Tel: 01453 766321 Tel: 01452 612485 Website: www.stroud.gov.uk Upton St Leonards Parish Council 11 Broadstone Close Barnwood Gloucester GL4 3TX Email: [email protected] Website: www.uptonstleonards-pc.gov.uk Tel: 01452 621688 .
    [Show full text]
  • G-GLO2 Section 106 Legal Agreements.Pdf
    Rural-Urban Outlooks: Unlocking Synergies (ROBUST) ROBUST receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 727988.* September 2018 Gloucestershire County Council Carey Stevens, Simon Excell [email protected] and [email protected] Rural-Urban Governance Arrangements and Planning Instruments Section 106 Legal Agreements Gloucestershire, UK 1. Overview District councils in Gloucestershire deal with nearly all planning applications for development including new homes, offices, factories and shops. However, Gloucestershire County Council is responsible for much of the infrastructure and services needed to make the built environment function properly. Section 106 (S106) Legal Agreements are agreements made between a planning authority (county and/or district council) and a developer/owner. These agreements contain obligations linked to a strategic development site which are required to mitigate the impact of the development. For example, if a development is likely to create more traffic, there may be obligations, either financial or non-financial, to carry out highways improvement works, or, to ensure that a proportion of houses within the development are available as ‘affordable housing’. As Gloucestershire is a ‘two-tier’ authority these agreements can be between the strategic authority, Gloucestershire County Council (GCC) and the developer or, between GCC, the district authority and the developer. Currently S106 contributions received in Gloucestershire are used to support highways, transportation, libraries and education infrastructure. 2. Main Challenges There are two main challenges in Gloucestershire: ˃ The delay between a Section 106 Legal agreement being drawn up, the development being commenced and the contributions being received from the developer.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents
    Helping older people in Gloucestershire feel more independent, secure, and have a better quality of life May 2014 Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group www.villageagents.org.uk Helping older people in Gloucestershire feel more independent, secure, and have a better quality of life Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Gloucestershire Village and Key objectives: To give older people easy Community Agents is aimed 3 access to a wide range of primarily at the over 50s but also To help older people in information that will enable them offers assistance to vulnerable 1 Gloucestershire feel more to make informed choices about people in the county. independent, secure, cared for, their present and future needs. and have a better quality of life. The agents provide information To engage older people to To promote local services and support to help people stay 4 enable them to influence and groups, enabling the independent, expand their social 2 future planning and provision. Agent to provide a client with a activities, gain access to a wide community-based solution To provide support to range of services and keep where appropriate. people over the age of 18 involved with their local 5 who are affected by cancer. communities. Partner agencies ² Gloucestershire County Council’s Adult Social Care Helpdesk ² Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group ² Gloucestershire Rural Community
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on Further Post Submission Proposed Changes
    Meeting: Planning Policy Sub-Committee Date: 17th September 2015 Subject: Stroud District Local Plan Consultation on Further Post Submission Proposed Changes (including further potential main modifications) Report Of: Anthony Wilson, Head of Planning Wards Affected: No Key Decision: No Budget/Policy Framework: No Contact Officer: Philip Bylo, Interim Planning Policy Manager [email protected] 01452 396854 Appendices: 1 – Hunts Grove Plan 1.0 Purpose of Report 1.1 To provide an overview of the further post submission proposed changes and further potential main modifications (July 2015) and endorsement of Paragraph 4.3 as the Council’s formal response to this consultation. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 Planning Policy Sub-Committee is asked to ENDORSE Paragraph 4.3 as the Council’s response to the Stroud District Local Plan consultation on further post submission proposed changes. 3.0 Background 3.1 Stroud District Council has prepared a Local Plan and Policies Map which it submitted to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in December 2013. The Local Plan relates to the whole District and provides a strategy for delivering growth up to 2031. The document provides the vision, objectives and strategic policies for delivering new homes, jobs, facilities and infrastructure. 3.2 The Plan has now been examined by an independent Inspector to ensure it is legally compliant and meets the test of soundness. Stage 1 of the examination began in April 2014 and resumed in May 2015. Stage 2 hearings were held in June 2015. 3.3 Following the hearings the Inspector has recommended that the Council undertake public consultation on further Post Submission Proposed Changes (“Further Proposed Changes”).
    [Show full text]