DOCSLIB.ORG

ESU National Schools Competitions for Debating and Public Speaking 2006-2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ESU National Schools Competitions for Debating and Public Speaking 2006-2007 The English-Speaking Union titleCentre for Speech and Debate ESU National Schools Competitions for Debating and Public Speaking 2006-2007 The ESU Public Speaking The ESU Schools Mace Competition for Schools The National Debating Championship • A Public Speaking competition for teams • A debating competition for teams of two of three students from Years 10 and 11 / students of any age (mostly 15-18). S3 and S4 only. What’s in this handbook? What’s in this handbook? • Welcome and Rules ......................... 22 • Welcome ............................................ 4 • How the competition is organised ... 24 • Rules .................................................. 4 • How a debate works ........................ 26 • Calendar for this year ........................ 4 • Defi nitions ........................................ 28 • Format ............................................... 5 • Rebuttal and summary speeches .... 29 • Guidelines for Chairpersons ............... 8 • Points of Information ....................... 30 • Guidelines for Speakers .................... 9 • Guidelines for debaters ................... 31 • Guidelines for Questioners .............. 12 • Guidelines for coaches .................... 35 • Guidelines for Coaches ................... 13 • Reporting competition ..................... 35 • Guidelines for Judges .......................14 • Guidelines for judges ....................... 36 • Judges’ mark sheet .......................... 16 • Hosting a round ............................... 44 • Timekeeper’s sheet .......................... 17 • Chairing and Timekeeping ............... 48 • Curriculum links ............................... 18 • Other debating formats ................... 52 • Winners ............................................ 19 • Cross-curricular debate ................... 54 • Meet the team .................................. 59 • Extra-curricular debate .................... 56 • Map of the competitions .......back page • Winners ............................................ 57 • About the ESU .................... back page • About the ESU / Map .......... back page Stay informed at www.britishdebate.com | © ESU, 2006 1956–2006The ESU Schools Mace is proud to be supported by the Department for Constitutional Affairs in our fi ftieth year ESU Public Speaking Competition for Schools Contents About the competition • Welcome ............................................ 4 What is it? • Rules .................................................. 4 • A competition featuring speeches on • Calendar for this year ........................ 4 topical themes chosen by competitors • Format ............................................... 5 from our lists of interesting topics. • Guidelines for Chairpersons ............... 8 • The Speaker is introduced by the • Guidelines for Speakers .................... 9 Chairperson and shows the ability to • Guidelines for Questioners .............. 12 think on their feet when interviewed by • Guidelines for Coaches ................... 13 the Questioner and the audience. • Guidelines for Judges .......................14 • In each 14-minute segment the • Judges’ mark sheet .......................... 16 Chairperson and Questioner come from • Timekeeper’s sheet .......................... 17 a different school from the Speaker. • Curriculum links ............................... 18 • Prizes and winners ........................... 19 Who’s it for? • Meet the team .................................. 49 • Teams of three students from Years 10 • Map of the competitions .......back page and 11 / S3 and S4 only. • About the ESU .................... back page • From England, Scotland and Wales ESU Public Speaking Competition for Schools Handbook 2006-7 | Introduction and Rules | Page 4 About the ESU Schools Public Speaking Competition Welcome from the National Organiser Rules about entry to the competition • The closing date for entry to the competition was 1 The ESU is delighted that you’ve chosen to take part in our Schools July, 2006. Late entries are at the discretion of the Public Speaking Competition for national, regional and branch organisers. 2006-7. • There is an entry fee of £30 which should be in the form of a cheque made payable to The English- The purpose of the competition is Speaking Union and sent to Dartmouth House. (A to give competitors the opportunity £10 discount is available for entries to both the to demonstrate and develop Public Speaking competition and the Schools Mace fundamental skills in public speaking. Competitors completed online at www.britishdebate.com). should be encouraged to believe that entering the • Entry fees are payable once a paper or online competition is an achievement in itself, and that application has been submitted to the ESU. Teams their public dialogue is a genuine contribution to the community and to free speech. that withdraw from the competition prior to the fi rst round are still required to pay the entry fee. The Schools Public Speaking Competition was • However, once a school has sent in an entry started by the Brighton & Hove Branch of the form, it should regard itself as fi rmly committed ESU in 1960, and has since grown to be a major to the contest. Last minute withdrawals cause stimulus of effective spoken English in British enormous diffi culties and schools are urged to schools. include a reserve in their team to minimise the It is intended to support the National Curriculum possibility of needing to withdraw. Inexperienced in English, which requires that students ‘speak teams have an excellent chance of success and and listen confi dently in a wide variety of contexts schools should not be discouraged because they ... adapting what they say and how they say it are new to the competition. Overpreparation is as to different situations and people’. The roles much of a danger as under-preparation. of Chairperson and Questioner in particular complement this demand, while all speakers are of course fulfi lling many other requirements of the Rules about eligibility of your team oral curriculum (see page 18 for more details on • Teams consist of three students, who must be how public speaking complements the curriculum preparing for GCSEs in years 10 or 11 (England in England, Wales and Scotland). and Wales) or for Standard Grades in S3 or S4 This handbook should answer most of your (Scotland). They must all be full-time students at questions about the competition. But if you the same school or college. have any questions or suggestions regarding the • Students cannot be changed between rounds competition, you can address them to me at: except in the case of illness or by written application to the Organiser of the round. Meriel Talbot National Organiser Public Speaking Competition for Schools Rules about the composition of teams The English-Speaking Union Dartmouth House • Teams consist of three speakers: 37 Charles Street - The Chairperson London W1J 5ED - The Speaker - The Questioner Telephone: 020 7529 1550 • In the competition, the Speaker contributes to the Fax: 020 7495 6108 presentation of the Chairperson and Questioner E-mail: [email protected] from another school, thus suggesting the reality I hope you enjoy the competition. that faces a visiting public speaker. • There is more information about the participants’ roles on page 6 and pages 8-12. Meriel Talbot National Organiser Stay informed at www.britishdebate.com | © ESU, 2006 ESU Public Speaking Competition for Schools Handbook 2006-7 | Introduction and Rules | Page 5 Rules about topics for the speeches • At Regional Finals and at the National Final the Chairperson and Questioner will be given the • In the branch and regional rounds of the competition, Speaker’s topic 30 minutes before the start of the speakers can choose a topic from a list issued by competition. the ESU. The speaker may speak for or against the topic as it is phrased in the programme. • For the national final, the ESU will assign a topic to About the structure of Branch, Regional and each school. The speaker may speak for or against National Organisers the topic as it is phrased by the ESU. • In the branch rounds, the Chairperson and • For administrative purposes, England, Wales Questioner may (at the Branch Organiser’s and Scotland are divided into regions which are discretion) be informed of the list of topics chosen subdivided and allocated to ESU branches. by all the participating teams. The actual topic for • Where possible, those schools outside existing ESU each presentation will be revealed by the Organiser branch areas will be allocated to an appropriate 30 minutes before the competition begins. This will ESU branch. of course depend on the cooperation of the schools taking part. A calendar for this year’s competition The competition consists of three or four rounds: • Regional Finals (normally involving no more than 8 schools) are organised by our Regional Public • One or two branch rounds are organised by your Speaking Organisers. local branch organiser who will contact you at • One team from each region goes to the UK Final, some point during the autumn term. organised by the ESU in London. 2006 2007 June to Continuation of 1 Deadline for entries to this September branch rounds. JUL year’s competition. Time for JAN your school to prepare a team for entry to the February to March competition. AUG FEB Regional Finals may Consider be held at any time having an during these months. in-school competition to select SEP September to your team MAR February (see p. 13). Branch rounds may
Load more

Recommended publications
  • College Historical Society
    COLLEGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY LAWS OF THE SOCIETY Chapter I Fundamental Regulations The following shall be considered the fundamental regulations of the College Historical Society and no Law or resolution in anywise contradicting, suspending or repealing them, or any part of them, shall be valid without the consent of the Board. 1. All persons paying the capital levy shall be eligible for the ordinary Membership of the Society. 2. Topics of religious controversy and present party politics shall be prohibited at the meetings of the Society. 3. Every meeting of the Society shall terminate not later than twelve o’clock by College time. 4. No person can be elected an Officer of the Historical Society without the sanction of the Board unless he be either officially connected with the University or be a member of the Society. This law shall not apply to the election of Vice-Presidents. Chapter II Annual Members 1. The amount of the annual subscription shall be determined by the General Committee in advance of the first of October of each session. 2. All persons who are eligible shall become Annual Members immediately upon paying their annual subscription. 3. The membership of every Annual Member shall lapse at the end of the sixth week of Michaelmas Term in the session following that in which his annual subscription was last paid. Every person whose membership shall have so lapsed shall be re-admissible on payment of the annual subscription. 4. Any member who is neither indebted to the Society in any amount, nor has in his possession any book from the Society’s Library, nor has any key belonging to the Society may resign from membership of the Society on notifying in writing the Record Secretary of his wish to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Academy Guide
    Debate Academy Guide 29 July to 3 August 2019, Uppingham School Introduction from the Course Director Debate Academy is an annual, week-long summer school in the United Kingdom dedicated to improving young people’s debating skills. It is held each year in late July to early August at Uppingham School in Rutland. Students aged 14-18 receive tuition from expert debating mentors in a variety of competitive debating formats. Whether you have little or no experience, or are getting ready for trials for your national debating team, Debate Academy will offer a tailored experience to suit you. This document is designed to provide additional information and hopefully to answer any questions you may have about Debate Academy. For the most up to date information on this year’s Debate Academy or to sign up for a place, please visit our website: http://www.esu.org/programmes/debate-academy If you have any further questions or queries about Debate Academy feel free to get in touch with me at [email protected]. I look forward to seeing you there! Bob Saull Debating Programmes Officer English-Speaking Union 1 Contents Learning at Debate Academy 3 Which ‘Track’ is for Me? 4 Which ‘Stream’ is for Me? 5 Living at Debate Academy 6 Applying to Debate Academy 9 2 Learning at Debate Academy At Debate Academy you will receive expert tuition on debating from some of the best debaters in the country. You will get the chance to discuss world issues, sharpen your analytical, reasoning and public speaking skills, and spar with other students from all over the world in competitive debates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Newsletter
    2018-2019 Newsletter The YDA by the Numbers: Another Outstanding Year The Yale Debate Association continued to dominate both at 1 home and abroad this year. The The YDA’s US team snagged its tenth consecutive Ranking Club of the Year Award and broke three teams and five judges at the World Universities Debating Championships among a long list 10 of its other stellar accomplishments Years in a Row from this year. as Top US Team The team excelled once more at APDA Nationals, with one team reaching semifinals, and one team reaching quarterfinals. By stay- ing on top of the ranks throughout the season, Yale also keep its COTY status for the tenth year in a row, leading second place team 8 Harvard by over 40 points. Tournaments Won Yale also performed strongly at WUDC. Three of five teams broke to elimination rounds, with Yale B reaching quarterfinals, and Yale A and Yale C both reaching double-octafinals. All five Yale-affiliat- 5 ed judges also judge broke. Top Speaker Awards The YDA had another oustanding year, and is looking forward to the next! Excellence at APDA Nationals The YDA had another incredible year at APDA Nationals. Eleven 11 team members qualified, and five Debaters teams competed at Nationals, Qualified to including two novices. Yale's Nationals competitors performed very well. Three debaters earned top twenty speaker awards: Will Arnesen ('20), also 10th Speaker of the Year, was 2nd speaker, Ellie Singer ('21) was 6th speaker, and Jack Kelly ('21) was 16th speaker. Two teams also broke to elimination rounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking 200 Years of Legal Education: Traditions of Change, Reasoned Debate, and Finding Differences and Commonalities
    MARKING 200 YEARS OF LEGAL EDUCATION: TRADITIONS OF CHANGE, REASONED DEBATE, AND FINDING DIFFERENCES AND COMMONALITIES Martha Minow∗ What is the significance of legal education? “Plato tells us that, of all kinds of knowledge, the knowledge of good laws may do most for the learner. A deep study of the science of law, he adds, may do more than all other writing to give soundness to our judgment and stability to the state.”1 So explained Dean Roscoe Pound of Harvard Law School in 1923,2 and his words resonate nearly a century later. But missing are three other possibilities regarding the value of legal education: To assess, critique, and improve laws and legal institutions; To train those who pursue careers based on legal training, which may mean work as lawyers and judges; leaders of businesses, civic institutions, and political bodies; legal academics; or entre- preneurs, writers, and social critics; and To advance the practice in and study of reasoned arguments used to express and resolve disputes, to identify commonalities and dif- ferences, to build institutions of governance within and between communities, and to model alternatives to violence in the inevi- table differences that people, groups, and nations see and feel with one another. The bicentennial of Harvard Law School prompts this brief explo- ration of the past, present, and future of legal education and scholarship, with what I hope readers will not begrudge is a special focus on one particular law school in Cambridge, Massachusetts. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ Carter Professor of General Jurisprudence; until July 1, 2017, Morgan and Helen Chu Dean and Professor, Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrutinised Long Manifestos - Tt20 (2Nd Election)
    SCRUTINISED LONG MANIFESTOS - TT20 (2ND ELECTION) CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT-ELECT Amy Gregg (Ex-Treasurer, Exeter College ) - Candidate for President-Elect - Long Manifesto The Union has had significant setbacks in the last few years. I did not intend to run this term, but it is clear that the Union needs a President who has the experience and the capability to set it back on the right course. The Union can do so much better, and the Union must do so much better. As an undergraduate, I was President of the Cambridge Union. During this time I ran a record-setting membership drive, managed a £100,000 budget, and hosted over thirty speakers including Stephen Fry, Quentin Blake and Moazzam Begg. After leaving Cambridge I was a trainee solicitor at a Magic Circle Law firm, and I now hold an offer for a pupillage to be a barrister. I have real world experience which I can use to improve our Union as well. I previously served on committee for 7 terms. In this time I arranged 5 debates, including confirming 5/6 speakers for the Comedy debate. I ran Debates, Panels and Speaker events, confirmed multiple speakers and chaired the Union’s largest committee. I also spent over 50 days of vacation working for the Union and made 3 winning paper speeches. As Treasurer I secured 29 debate Floor Prizes, 12 New Treasurer’s Treats and coordinated sponsorship from a major Scholarship fund - ensuring transparency by publishing the audited accounts on the app. This demonstrates that I have the ability to run the Union, but it also made me realise: the Union needs real change - change only an experienced President can bring.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Association & Debate Speech National ©
    © National SpeechDebate & Association DEBATE 101 Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Bill Smelko & Will Smelko DEBATE 101 Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Bill Smelko & Will Smelko © NATIONAL SPEECH & DEBATE ASSOCIATION DEBATE 101: Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Copyright © 2013 by the National Speech & Debate Association All rights reserved. Published by National Speech & Debate Association 125 Watson Street, PO Box 38, Ripon, WI 54971-0038 USA Phone: (920) 748-6206 Fax: (920) 748-9478 [email protected] No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, information storage and retrieval, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. The National Speech & Debate Association does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, gender identity, gender expression, affectional or sexual orientation, or disability in any of its policies, programs, and services. Printed and bound in the United States of America Contents Chapter 1: Debate Tournaments . .1 . Chapter 2: The Rudiments of Rhetoric . 5. Chapter 3: The Debate Process . .11 . Chapter 4: Debating, Negative Options and Approaches, or, THE BIG 6 . .13 . Chapter 5: Step By Step, Or, It’s My Turn & What Do I Do Now? . .41 . Chapter 6: Ten Helpful Little Hints . 63. Chapter 7: Public Speaking Made Easy .
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of the Cambridge Union Society
    The Constitution of the Cambridge Union Society THE LAWS 0) Definitions 1) The Laws and Rules The Structure of The Cambridge Union 2) Membership 3) The Standing Committee 4) Officers 5) The Responsibilities of the Officers 6) The Review Committee Elections and Appointments 7) Elections Procedure 8) Charitable Points for Elections 9) Electoral Rules 10) Electoral Investigations 11) Appointments Procedure Codes and Policies 12) Code of Conduct 13) Code of Conduct Investigation 14) Principles of the Union 15) Restrictions on Invitations 16) Expenses Policy 17) Procedure for Main Debates 18) Policy on Reciprocal Membership Page 1 of 67 THE RULES Events Policies 1) Duty Officer 2) House Rules 3) Guest Policy Competitive Debating 4) Debating Team Selection and Reimbursement 5) Management of Debating Budget 6) Convenors 7) Convenors Positions and Responsibilities Organisational Committees 8) Full Committee 9) Full Committee Departments and Responsibilities 10) Sub-Committees 11) Budget Committee 12) Competitive Debating Committee 13) Vacation Committee 14) Executive Committee Miscellaneous 15) Handover 16) Social Events Planning Procedure Page 2 of 67 Definitions THE LAWS Definitions In these Laws and Rules the following expressions have the following means unless inconsistent with the context: 1) Accounts Manager means the individual hired by the Society to run its accounts. 2) Appeals Panel means the panel appointed in accordance with Law 13 which handles disciplinary appeals. 3) Appellant means a member of the Society who is seeking an appeal to a disciplinary decision. 4) Appointee means a member of the Society appointed to a formal position. 5) Board of Trustee-Directors means the group of individual trustee directors who have ultimate responsibility for directing the affairs of the charity from time to time in accordance with the Charities Act 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • ESU Schools Mace Handbook
    YEARS 7-13 ESU SCHOOLS’ MACE Debating competition for secondary school students DISCOVER YOUR VOICE ONGOING SUPPORT FOR TEACHERS CONTENTS The ESU Discover Your Voice programme helps students to express and critically evaluate ideas and share them The ESU support the hundreds of teachers who make this Welcome from the Oracy Team 4 with others. Classroom workshops are delivered by trained competition possible in two ways. ESU Mentors – university students who are experts in their field. We tailor workshops to suit all age ranges, abilities 1. We offer all our teaching resources for free on our TEACHER GUIDE 5 and experience, and work with schools to tailor each website at www.esu.org/resources. Anyone can search session to their individual needs. for exercises that help train the four assessment areas Curriculum Links 6 of the Schools’ Mace. We also upload a new motion Discover Your Voice helps students to engage with their resource every Monday via Twitter (@ESUdebate) and Equity Policy 9 curriculum learning in a new, exciting and fun way. via the website. The motion includes prompt questions. Glossary 10 Whether your students are beginners or whether you are 2. We also offer training days that help teachers coach their interested in developing particular skills, we can provide students to improve their performance at competitions. Rules 12 a teaching package that will work for you. We also offer training for whole school oracy. Our mentors can also give students and teachers advice Contact [email protected] for more information on CPD Finding Judges 13 about entering our competitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees' Annual Report & Accounts
    TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2016 For the year ended 31st December 2016 Scottish Charity Number: SC000653 SCOTTISH NATIONAL COMMITTEE The members of the Scottish National Committee (SNC), who are the Trustees of the charity for the purposes of charity law, have pleasure in submitting the charity’s Annual Report for the year ended 31st December 2016. Chairman Deputy Chairmen Lord Duncan of Springbank Alex Orr and Greg Murray Hon. Treasurer Hon. Secretary Lawrence Edwards FCA Cllr. Iain Whyte (re-elected 28 October 2016) Committee members Wendy Bellars (appointed 28 October 2016) Nick Bibby (resigned 3 July 2017) Helen Fowler (resigned 31 March 2016) Jane Kennedy (appointed 28 October 2016, resigned 27 August 2017) Douglas Lowe Melvyn Roffe Dr. Helen Wright STAFF Administration Simon Christie Head of Education Suzanne Ensom Speech and Debates Officer Alex Don (September 2015 – July 2016) Jess Anderson (appointed August 2016) Gallery 23 Director Dr. Julie Hansen (appointed August 2016) Independent Reviewer Principal Bankers Alan Livesey ACA Unity Trust Bank 1 Coates Place 11 Brindlay Place Edinburgh EH3 7AA Birmingham B1 2HB Investment Managers Principal Address Brewin Dolphin 23 Atholl Crescent 7 Drumsheugh Gardens Edinburgh EH3 8HQ Edinburgh EH3 7QH Charity Name: English-Speaking Union Scottish Branches Education Fund Scottish Charity Number: SC000653 Constitution The English-Speaking Union Scotland is an unincorporated charity established by a Resolution dated 17th December 1952 of the Board of Governors of the English-Speaking Union of the Commonwealth. This resolution was reconfirmed on 1st February 1975. It registered as a Scottish charity (No. SC000653) under the name of English-Speaking Union Scottish Branches Education Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 Projected Availability of and Demand for Primary and Secondary School Places Projection and Forecasting Methodology C
    Appendix 2 Projected availability of and demand for primary and secondary school places Projection and forecasting methodology Cardiff employs a robust projection methodology for planning school places which takes account of NHS GP registration data and school census data submitted by and verified by all Cardiff schools. As projections can only take account of historic and current information the Council also identifies trends within projections, and analyses school preference data and other contextual information to produce forecasts on a city wide basis and in each locality. Data analysis allows projections to be prepared based on localised patterns at primary school catchment area level, by secondary school catchment and on a city-wide basis. Each of these provide differing contextual information to inform the forecasting on the number of places that may be needed to meet the requirements of each area and of Cardiff as a whole. The geographical units that are most suitable to analyse the recent and future demand for primary school places in each area are primary school catchment areas. A wider range of geographical information including aggregated primary school catchment areas, secondary school catchment areas, city-wide information and outflow to other admissions authorities informs planning for meeting the demand for secondary school places. School catchment areas in Cardiff are not coterminous with ward boundaries and often serve all or part of several ward areas. The geographical unit that is most suitable to analyse the demand for English-medium secondary school places serving Adamsdown and Splott is the Willows High School catchment area. Separate to forecasts for existing housing in Cardiff, projections are prepared for new housing planned on large scale housing developments, including the strategic Greenfield and Brownfield housing sites identified in the Local Development Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiff County Council Planning Applications
    CARDIFF COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATIONS RECEIVED DURING WEEK ENDING 01 JULY 2021 The attached list shows those planning applications received by the Council during the stated week. These applications can be inspected during normal working hours at the address below: PLANNING, TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT COUNTY HALL CARDIFF CF10 4UW Any enquiries or representations should be addressed to the CHIEF STRATEGIC PLANNING, HIGHWAYS, TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION OFFICER at the above address. In view of the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985, such representations will normally be available for public inspection. Future Planning Committee Dates are as follows: 21 July 2021 18 August 2021 Total Count of Applications: 76 ADAMSDOWN 21/01570/MNR Non Material Amendment Expected Decision Level: DEL Received: 28/06/2021 Ward: ADAMSDOWN Case Officer: David Davies Applicant: Cardiff Council Housing Development , c/o Agent, , Agents: LRM Planning Ltd., 22 Cathedral Road, Cardiff, , , CF11 9LJ Proposal: REMOVE CONDITION 5 AND FOR A NEW CONDITION IN LINE WITH COMMENTS REGARDING NOISE TO REPLACE IT - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED UNDER 21/00053/MJR At: FORMER CITADEL SITE, SPLOTT ROAD CHURCH, SPLOTT ROAD, SPLOTT 21/01595/MJR Full Planning Permission Expected Decision Level: DEL Received: 24/06/2021 Ward: ADAMSDOWN Case Officer: James Hansel Applicant: Messrs Bullock and Malick Garrison Barclay Ltd and Iqra Solutions Ltd, , , Agents: Philippa Cole. Planning Consultant, 14 Ty Gwyn Crescent, Penylan, Cardiff, , CF23 5JL Proposal: DEVELOPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Dec 2016
    Brynmawr Foundation School DecemberBrynmawr 2016 Newsletter Foundation School Ysgol Sylfaenol Brynmawr December 2016 Newsletter Dear Parent, Time this year has flown by but the year so far has been packed full of achievements born from the efforts of our students, staff and school community. Every day I continue to be inspired by the students and my colleagues and all that they do together to make Brynmawr Foundation School special, unique and outstanding. All the activities and achievements since September continue to highlight how impressive our students are and the energy, talent, enthusiasm and commitment they bring to our school, Dates for your Diary illustrating the continued dedication of all our staff I am proud of the commitment our students have shown in December representing their school when on trips and also at events in 15th – End of Term the school. 16th – INSET Day For some families, of course, Christmas does not bring the joy January and happiness with which others are so blessed. With this in 3rd – Start of Spring Term mind I am extremely proud of our pupils and their efforts in 19th – Year 9/10 Options Evening raising money for charity including, once again, a significant th amount of money to buy presents for the Barnardo’s appeal. 25 – 6pm Year 11 Prom Catwalk Show Our focus in January continues to be student progress and ensuring that students are positively engaged with their February learnin g. We have had over 200 applicants for a maximum 151 7th – 9th School Production entry in September 2017. Staff have maintained incredibly 15th – Year 11 Parents Evening high standards as a team, so that all functions of the school 16th – 20th Florida Trip are focused on supporting the students’ learning and progress.
    [Show full text]