DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright by Maria De Los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright by Maria De Los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez 2008 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UT Digital Repository Copyright by Maria de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Maria de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Who Sets the Media Agenda? News vs. Advertising Committee: Maxwell E. McCombs, Supervisor Dominic Lasorsa Chappell Lawson Paula Poindexter Joseph Straubhaar Who Sets the Media Agenda? News vs. Advertising by María de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2008 Dedication In the memory of my grandmother Doña Margarita Talamás Vázquez de Gutiérrez Treviño (1918-2008) Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my advisor, Maxwell E. McCombs, for his mentorship and encouragement throughout the process of this dissertation. Additionally, I want to thank my dissertation committee members—Dominic Lasorsa, Chappell Lawson, Paula Poindexter, and Joseph Straubhaar—for their advice and assistance. I extend my gratitude to Carol Adams Means for assisting me closely, especially in reviewing early versions of this research, and Dr. Herbert M. Levine for editing my dissertation. My appreciation is also extended to the Center of Communication Research at Monterrey Tech (CINCO) director José Carlos Lozano and his graduate students: Citlalli Sánchez Hernández, Esmeralda González Coronado, Eduardo García Reyes, Andrea Menchaca Trillo, and Paola Gabriela López Arnaut for their assistance with the coding conducted for this research. I would like to give a special acknowledgment to my son, Juan Gerardo Madero Flores, for giving me the inspiration and support to continue working when my strength and motivations seemed to fade away. Finally, I am grateful to my family and friends for their support and affection. v Who Sets the Media Agenda? News vs. Advertising Maria de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2008 Supervisor: Maxwell E. McCombs Grounded in the theory of intra-media agenda-setting, this research will analyze the dynamic process among the Mexican national television networks during the 2006 presidential election campaign period. Specifically, what were the intra-media agenda-setting effects between the Mexican television media Televisa and TV Azteca during the 2006 presidential election campaign? The television content analysis data set is from a systematic random sample of national Mexican prime time television news programs broadcast during the official Instituto Federal Electoral's (Federal Electoral Institute) presidential campaign period, which runs from January 19 to June 28, 2006. The Mexican television newscasts that were analyzed are Televisa's El Noticiero con Joaquín López Dóriga, and TV Azteca's Hechos de la Noche. Overall, the results indicated that television news strongly influences a presidential candidate’s television political spots. The flow of communication between television news and a candidate’s television political spots was scrutinized in several time frames in order to examine the influence from a general perspective (3 months, then 2 months) into a specific (month by month) perspective. The outcome at the 3-month scale indicated that television news strongly influenced a candidate’s vi political spots. The same pattern was observed at the two-month interval. Finally, the month-by- month outcome also indicated that television news influenced a candidate’s political spots. vii Table of Contents List of Tables ..........................................................................................................x List of Figures ....................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................1 Negative Television Spots ..............................................................................5 Election Results: The Starting Point of the Postelectoral Controversy ..........7 PAN's Political Marketing Techniques...........................................................7 Negative Campaigning Effect: What went Wrong? .....................................13 The Accusation of Fraud...............................................................................17 Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación Ruling ....................22 PRD vs. PAN: The Failure to Achieve Legislative Agreement....................26 The Regression to an Authoritarian Media Regimen ...................................29 Purpose of the Study .....................................................................................37 Chapter 2 Review of the Literature.......................................................................40 Agenda-Setting Theory.................................................................................40 Political Marketing as a Global Phenomenon...............................................51 Political Advewrtising and Voter Turnout....................................................59 Videocracia and Mediocracia .......................................................................70 Brief History of the Television Era and Its Electoral Coverage ...................75 2006 Election: Candidates and their Political Platforms …………………..86 Chapter 3 The 2007 Electoral Reform: The New Role of the Media ...................94 Talk Show ...................................................................................................106 The Senate Chamber...................................................................................110 The Right to Reply......................................................................................112 Chamber of Deputies ..................................................................................119 Electoral Reform Was Ratified in Mexico..................................................123 viii Chapter 4 Spots: The Candidates' Major Political Communication Strategy.....128 AMLO is Dangerous for Mexico................................................................133 Gordillo's Revenge Plan..............................................................................140 Vicente Fox's Revenge Strategy .................................................................144 IFE's Media Watch......................................................................................150 Penalties……………………………………………………………………153 Spotgate……………………………………………………………………155 Chapter 5 Political Campaigns as Entertainment: The Commodification of the Presidential Candidates...................................................................................................159 2000 Election Phenomenon ........................................................................161 ¡Qué Madre, tan Padre!...............................................................................163 El Privilegio de Mandar..............................................................................164 The Other Campaign...................................................................................172 Summary.....................................................................................................181 Chapter 6 Electoral Law: From 1824 to 2000 ....................................................185 1976 Election ..............................................................................................192 1988 Election ..............................................................................................195 1994 Election ..............................................................................................204 2000 Election ..............................................................................................206 Chapter 7 Methodology ......................................................................................220 Research Hypotheses ..................................................................................221 Method ........................................................................................................221 Hypotheses 1...............................................................................................225 Hypotheses 2...............................................................................................227 Hypotheses 3...............................................................................................229 Hypotheses 4...............................................................................................231 Hypotheses 5...............................................................................................234 Hypotheses 6 ..............................................................................................235 Chapter 8 Television News vs. Television Political Advertising .......................237 Hypotheses 1...............................................................................................237 ix Hypotheses 2...............................................................................................242 Hypotheses 3...............................................................................................262 Hypotheses 4...............................................................................................270
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyright by Maria De Los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez 2008
    Copyright by Maria de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Maria de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Who Sets the Media Agenda? News vs. Advertising Committee: Maxwell E. McCombs, Supervisor Dominic Lasorsa Chappell Lawson Paula Poindexter Joseph Straubhaar Who Sets the Media Agenda? News vs. Advertising by María de los Ángeles Flores Gutiérrez, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2008 Dedication In the memory of my grandmother Doña Margarita Talamás Vázquez de Gutiérrez Treviño (1918-2008) Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my advisor, Maxwell E. McCombs, for his mentorship and encouragement throughout the process of this dissertation. Additionally, I want to thank my dissertation committee members—Dominic Lasorsa, Chappell Lawson, Paula Poindexter, and Joseph Straubhaar—for their advice and assistance. I extend my gratitude to Carol Adams Means for assisting me closely, especially in reviewing early versions of this research, and Dr. Herbert M. Levine for editing my dissertation. My appreciation is also extended to the Center of Communication Research at Monterrey Tech (CINCO) director José Carlos Lozano and his graduate students: Citlalli Sánchez Hernández, Esmeralda González Coronado, Eduardo García Reyes, Andrea Menchaca Trillo, and Paola Gabriela López Arnaut for their assistance with the coding conducted for this research. I would like to give a special acknowledgment to my son, Juan Gerardo Madero Flores, for giving me the inspiration and support to continue working when my strength and motivations seemed to fade away.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlos Ahumada Kurtz
    Cnrlo8 Ahumada Kurtz nació en - 1963, en Argentina; es mexicano por naturalizaci6n. Hlzo estudios en el Colegio de Ciencias y Humanidades y en la Facultad de Ciencias de la uw. En 1983 obtuvo el Premio Nacional de la Juventud. Su Ércüvidad empresarial se ha desplegado en diversos campos: agricultura, minerfa, industria restaurantera, futbol profesional, construcci6n, entre otros. En 2003 fundd el peiidico El Independiente. Actualmente radica en Argentina Derecho de réplica es su primer libro. DERECHO DE RÉPLICA Revelaciones de la más grande pantalla política en México CARLOS AHUMADA KURTZ DERECHO DE RÉPLICA Revelaciones de la más grande pantalla política en México Grijalbo Derecho de riplica Revelaciones de la más grande pantalla poI/tica en México Primera edición: abril, 2009 Primera reimpresión: abril, 2009 D. R. (:)2009, Carlos Ahumada Kurtz D. R O 2009, derechos de edición mundiales en lengua castellana: Random House Mondadori, S.A. de C.v. Av. Hornero núm. 544, col. Cbapultepec Morales, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11570, México, DF www.rhmx.com.mx Comentarios sobre la edición y el contenido de este libro a: [email protected] Queda rigurosamente prohibida, sin autorización escrita de los titu- lares del copyright, bajo las sanciones establecidas por las leyes, la reproducción total o parcial de esta obra por cualquier medio o pro- . cedimiento, comprendidos la reprografla, el tratamiento informático, asi como la distribución de ejemplares de la misma mediante alquiler o préstamo públicos. ISBN 978~607-429-437-8 Impreso en México / Printed in Mexico Dedico este libro a quienes más me inspiraron y motivaron a escribirlo. Con ellos tengo una deuda de gratitud eterna.
    [Show full text]
  • Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk 2009- Contemporary Mexican Politics
    CONTEMPORARY MEXICAN POLITICS EMILY EDMONDS-POLI and DAVID A. SHIRK ContempMexPolPBK.indd 1 10/16/08 12:23:29 PM #/.4%-0/2!29 -%8)#!.0/,)4)#3 CONTEMPORARY MEXIC AN POLITICS Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright © 2009 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Edmonds, Emily. Contemporary Mexican politics / Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-7425-4048-4 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7425-4048-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-7425-4049-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7425-4049-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Mexico--Politics and government--2000- I. Shirk, David A., 1971- II. Title. F1236.7.E36 2009 320.972--dc22 2008031594 Printed in the United States of America ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPÍTULO 4 RESULTADOS 4.1 Descripción Del Trabajo De Campo
    CAPÍTULO 4 RESULTADOS 4.1 Descripción del trabajo de campo El trabajo de campo realizado para efectuar el análisis de recepción del programa El Privilegio de mandar se llevó a cabo en un periodo que comprende desde el 11 de julio hasta el 27 de septiembre de 2006. A pesar de que en un principio se había considerado que el trabajo de campo se realizaría antes del 9 de julio, fecha en la que se transmitió el último capítulo del programa, esta extensión de tiempo resultó favorable debido a la polémica surgida sobre la emisión final de El Privilegio de mandar. Dicho capítulo fue mencionado por los informantes durante los grupos focales así como en las entrevistas a profundidad y generó opiniones las cuales son de gran utilidad para analizar tanto la percepción del programa como la recepción de los mensajes emitidos por El Privilegio de mandar según la postura política de los informantes. La extensión del tiempo del trabajo de campo se dio sin intención alguna. Más que nada, fue el resultado de la dificultad de encontrar informantes con las características requeridas para esta investigación. El Privilegio de mandar: Análisis de la recepción de la comedia política mexicana 117 Resultados Aunque las informantes son residentes de la ciudad de Puebla, la investigación etnográfica fue realizada tanto en Cholula como en Puebla, según las peticiones de los informantes así como su localización ya que se buscaba un lugar que les acomodara a los participantes de los grupos. Los grupos focales se realizaron en lugares públicos, en cafeterías para ser más preciso el dato.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance to the Censorship of Historical Thought in the Twentieth
    Published as: Antoon De Baets, “Resistance to the Censorship of Historical Thought in the Twentieth Century,” in: Sølvi Sogner, ed., Making Sense of Global History: The 19th International Congress of Historical Sciences, Oslo 2000, Commemorative Volume (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2001), 389–409. RESISTANCE TO THE CENSORSHIP OF HISTORICAL THOUGHT IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY1 Antoon De Baets University of Groningen, the Netherlands Abstract—This paper attempts to demonstrate that many historians have resisted the censorship of historical thought, either inside or outside tyrannical regimes, throughout the twentieth century. Those who actively struggled against persecution were either directly threatened and resisted the threat, or less personally involved but fighting for the cause of history, academic freedom and human rights. A third group, frequently in the background, consisted of all the outsiders who attempted to maintain solidarity with their persecuted colleagues. In addition, historians, in a unique professional reflex, are able to supplement contemporary resistance with retroactive resistan- ce. They possess the power to reopen cases and challenge the rulers' amnesia and falsification of history. The first group of historians were those directly affected by repression. Historians in prison taught history to their fellow inmates or were able to do some historical research. Outside prison, some historians engaged in clandestine activities such as publishing their work in the samizdat circuit, teaching at flying universities, or illegally gaining access to closed archives. Others defied likely censorship by refuting the cherished historical myths that supported the powers that be, or by uttering the unmentionable with historical metaphors. A minority adopted methods of open resistance. Some bravely refused to take loyalty oaths, and were dismissed.
    [Show full text]
  • CID Working Paper No. 075 :: Presidential Leadership And
    Presidential Leadership and Decision-Making in Policy Reforms: The First 150 Days of Vicente Fox Rocío Ramos de Villarreal CID Working Paper No. 75 September 2001 Copyright 2001 Rocio Ramos de Villarreal and the President and Fellows of Harvard College Working Papers Center for International Development at Harvard University Presidential Leadership and Decision-Making in Policy Reforms. The First 150 Days of Vicente Fox Rocío Ramos de Villarreal Abstract At the beginning of the twenty-first century, Mexico, the twelfth-largest economy in the world and the second-largest trading partner of the US, finds itself undergoing profound transformations. After more than seven decades with a hegemonic party exercising presidential power, the country is now immersed in a full-fledged democratic process, after a ‘silk transition’. Politically, there has been a fundamental transformation in the scope of presidential rule and the relationship between the president and Congress. Whereas the legislative branch was subordinate to the executive for over half a century, Mexico’s new democracy has ushered in a Congress that is more powerful and independent, and the president now needs to lobby and negotiate with it. In this context, the ability to pass reform measures requires not only expertise in technical design or instrumental consistency but, foremost, skillfultactical management in the political arena. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of Mexico’s evolution toward electoral democracy and to analyze President Fox’s leadership and the decision-making process he employed in his efforts to attain two major policy reforms in his first 150 days as president: the tax reform and the Indigenous bill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nazi-Instigated National Synarchist Union of Mexico: What It
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 31, Number 28, July 16, 2004 EIRSynarchy WHAT IT MEANS FOR TODAY The Nazi-Instigated National Synarchist Union ofMexico Part 2, by William F. Wertz, Jr. Part 1, which appeared in last week’s EIR, traced the origins D. Roosevelt had spoken in December 1932, and then again in of Synarchism in Mexico, including the founding of the Na- his Inaugural Address on March 1, 1933. The most important tional Synarchist Union (UNS) by the Nazis and the Spanish aspect of the agreement was that the United States officially Falangists, and its wartime role in support of the Axis cause. recognized Mexico’s sovereign ownership of its subsoil Here, a new chapter begins, after Pearl Harbor and the Mexi- wealth. The agreement contained six points: 1) an evaluation can declaration of war against the Axis powers: An anti- of the expropriated oil properties; 2) Mexico agreed to satisfy Roosevelt Anglo-American imperialist faction, acting all outstanding claims of U.S. citizens for revolutionary dam- through the Dulles-Buckley networks associated with Cardi- age and expropriated properties, through the payment of $40 nal Spellman and Bishop Fulton Sheen of the United States, million over 14 years; 3) negotiation of a reciprocal trade moved in to control the UNS. These networks remain active agreement; 4) the U.S. Treasury would stabilize currency to this day, including notably against the LaRouche forces in through the purchase of Mexican pesos, and would buy Mexi- Ibero-America. Two former LaRouche associates, Marivilia can silver at the fixed rate of 35¢ an ounce, renewing the Carrasco and Fernando Quijano, went over to the syn- arrangement it had prior to the oil expropriations; and 6) the archist camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Unbundling Path Dependence: a Case Study Of
    UNBUNDLING PATH DEPENDENCE: A CASE STUDY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM IN MEXICO (1990-2006) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF LAW AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF THE SCIENCE OF LAW Beatriz Adriana Camarena Osorno September 2007 © Copyright by Beatriz Adriana Camarena Osorno 2007 All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law. ________________________________ (Thomas C. Heller), Principal Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law. ________________________________ (Alberto Díaz-Cayeros) I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law. ________________________________ (Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar) Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies. iii ABSTRACT This is a case study of the telecommunications reform in Mexico, which transformed the state telephone monopoly, through privatization (1990-1996) and liberalization (1996-2006), into a multi-competitor telecommunications market. Reform results show (1) growth, but primarily through a concentrated market and the economic output of the dominant privatized incumbents, and (2) improvements in sector development, but with insufficient levels of competition and investment, and underdevelopment in infrastructure, service diversity, pricing, technology deployment, and universal access.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 2007O| VOLUME XXXVIII Rum| ISSUE 2 in THIS ISSUE
    Latin American Studies Association fSPRING 2007o| VOLUME XXXVIII rum| ISSUE 2 IN THIS ISSUE On the Profession What LASA Can Do For Political Scientists by EVELYNE S. HUBER A Survey of Political Scientists’ Views on LASA by RAÚL MADRID El incierto rumbo de LASA by ARIEL C. ARMONY What Might LASA Do to Best Meet the Needs and Serve the Interests of Those in the Political Sciences? by SUSAN C. STOKES Debates Immigration Matters Don’t Panic, We are Hispanic! Migración y resistencia social by JOSÉ MANUEL VALENZUELA ARCE Crossing-back Methodologies Transnational Feminist Research on Incest in Mexico by GLORIA GONZÁLEZ-LÓPEZ Why the Immigrant Rights Struggle Compels Us to Reconceptualize Both Latin American and Latino/a Studies by WILLIAM I. ROBINSON Political Commentary Situación social y política de México y de Oaxaca al final del gobierno de Vicente Fox y principios del gobierno de Felipe Calderón. by SALOMÓN NAHMAD President Charles R. Hale, University of Texas, Austin [email protected] Vice President Eric Hershberg, Simon Fraser University [email protected] Past President Sonia E. Alvarez, University of Massachusetts, Amherst [email protected] Table of Contents Treasurer Kevin Middlebrook, University of London [email protected] EXECUTIVE COUNCIL 1 From the President | by CHARLES R. HALE For term ending October 2007 4 From the Associate Editor | by ARTURO ARIAS José Antonio Aguilar Rivera, Centro de Docencia e Investigación Económica ON THE PROFESSION Elizabeth Jelin, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas 6 What LASA Can Do For Political Scientists | by EVELYNE S. HUBER Lynn Stephen, University of Oregon 8 A Survey of Political Scientists’ Views on LASA | by RAÚL MADRID For term ending April 2009 Alcida Rita Ramos, Universidade de Brasília 11 El incierto rumbo de LASA | by ARIEL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of William STINNAFORD
    Stinneford Family of Wells, Maine First Generation 1. William STINNAFORD was born about 1779 in , , England and died after Jun 1860 in Wells, York, ME. Possibly the William Staniford/Stanford born 26 March 1777 in Ipswich MA to Capt. Jeremiah who md Mary Potter, but that William died 2 months later. See also notes for William Jr 1809. See also 1850 census note below. Name is spelled Stinford on his mar-rec p125/135; all children are spelled Stinnaford on his family register in Wells VR p232; Stenford or Steneford on his ch d-recs. Daughter Eleanor Stinnaford d at age 1 p286. 1850 Wells census York 165: William Staniford 70 born England caulker (boats), Hannah 69 b Wells ME. He died on the poor farm in Wells on Rt 109. 1860 Wells census lists him in the Wells Alms House as William Stinaford 81 pauper b Mass. Wells Hist Soc says there are no marked graves or record of who is buried there. William Stinford m Hannah Cain at the First Church of Wells Congregational, by Rev Moses Hemenway. We need a Y-DNA test of a Stinneford male to see who he matches and what other family names. Various possible parents of Hannah Cain: see Wells VR. Sources besides those stated, ME & MA VR, ME brides/grooms index, ME death index, census, and MOCA cemetery records. William married Hannah CAIN, daughter of CAIN and Ann PERKINS, 9 Dec 1802 in Wells, York, ME. Hannah was born in 1781 in Wells, York, ME and died 1851-1859 in Wells, York, ME.
    [Show full text]
  • Cómo Citar El Artículo Número Completo Más Información Del
    Espacio Abierto ISSN: 1315-0006 [email protected] Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Fernández Poncela, Anna María El humor en las elecciones o las elecciones del humor Espacio Abierto, vol. 29, núm. 2, 2020, -Junio, pp. 205-237 Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12264379011 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Volumen 29 Nº 2 (Abril - Junio 2020): 205- 236 El humor en las elecciones o las elecciones del humor. Anna María Fernández Poncela. Resumen. El objetivo de este texto es un análisis del humor en el proceso elec- toral presidencial de México, 2018. Se centra en las teorías, tipos y funciones del humor en general, aplicadas de manera particular en este estudio de caso. Esto se hace a través de la revisión de memes, caricaturas, chistes, videos, canciones y bromas que circularon en los discursos políticos, los medios de comunicación y las redes sociales digitales. Como resultado decir que predominó un humor hostil, de defensa o de ataque. Palabras clave: elecciones, humor, chistes, memes, candidatos, México. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco. Coyoacán DF, Méxic0. E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Recibido: 17/12/2019 - Aceptado: 21/02/2020 El humor en las elecciones o las elecciones del humor. Anna María Fernández Poncela. /206 The humor in the elections or the elections of humor.
    [Show full text]
  • Quijano Dossier’ and the National Security Threat to the United States
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 31, Number 30, July 30, 2004 Party, by Hitler’s order, in Mexico and other countries, and the entirety of the fascist phenomenon in Europe, and the wars reintroduced to Mexico by William F. Buckley, senior and of that period. Entirely, including Japan. Entirely. son, in the postwar period, as a CIA office agent in Mexico. “These were financier interests who were protected by the That kind of stuff. Truman Administration at the end of the war. They are intact. To find what creates these kinds of things, LaRouche elab- They exist today. These are the guys, these banking circles, orated, people must know something about history. “The top which run government from above, which have a separate power in the world is not people in governments. The top ability, a separate capability, to use even facilities of govern- power in the world is represented by international, financier ment, to get access to everything, and to run such an operation. oligarchical cartel interests, typified by the Synarchist Inter- Who could run 9/11? These guys. They are the ones who can national of the period 1918-1945, which was responsible for run such an operation.” The ‘Quijano Dossier’ and the National Security Threat to the United States The LaRouche in 2004 campaign committee released this terrorist potential embedded in this right-wing Synarchist ap- chronology and fact-sheet on July 23 in connection with Lyn- paratus. Fiore fled to Great Britain in the early 1980s to avoid don LaRouche’s July 15 webcast statement on the terrorist prosecution for membership in an illegal association, after he threat.
    [Show full text]