Agenda Item 5.1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agenda Item 5.1 AGENDA ITEM 5.1 DR/01/17 committee DEVELOPMENT & REGULATION date 27 January 2017 MINERALS AND WASTE DEVELOPMENT Proposal: For the northern quarry void and plant site including the restoration of the northern quarry void using inert materials to agriculture and nature conservation interest with new public rights of way, the installation and operation of an inert waste recycling facility in the plant site for the production of secondary aggregate followed by the restoration of the plant site to nature conservation interest and the creation of an area of biodiversity compensation habitat Location: Land at Sandon Quarry Molrams Lane, Sandon Ref: ESS/08/16/CHL Applicant: Brett Aggregates Limited Report by Acting Head of County Planning Enquiries to: Terry Burns Tel: 03330 136440 The full application can be viewed at www.essex.gov.uk/viewplanning Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Crown Copyright reserved Essex County Council, Chelmsford Licence L000 19602 1. BACKGROUND & SITE Sandon Quarry is a former sand and gravel site situated South East of Sandon Village and separated from it by the A12T. Access to the quarry complex is taken off a junction with Church Street and Molrams Lane, these being a slip road onto the A1114. The A1114 itself is some 650 metres north west of its own access with the A12 (T) and A130. From the junction entrance an internal haul road runs eastwards for some 650 metres, crossing both formerly worked mineral land (part agriculture and part now designed to accommodate an area of biodiversity compensation habitat associated with the southern void workings referred to below) and the A12 (T) to then access the site areas identified above. The Sandon Quarry complex can be considered to comprise a number of discrete areas these being referred to as: • Northern quarry void – the subject of this application, and situated between the A12 (T) and Sandon Brook. This area is a former quarry extraction void that was then used for some silt disposal and is now partially filled with water. There is a 2 metre high soil bund extending around the north western perimeter of the void and a 5 metre high stockpile located adjacent the voids north eastern perimeter. Adjacent the A12 (T) the void perimeter is at about 27 – 28m Above Ordnance Datum (AOD) with water level maintained at around 10 m AOD. The base of the void is between 4 – 8 m AOD. Side slopes are described as generally between 1 vertical (v) and 2-4 horizontal (h). Steeper slopes are located predominantly on the north, northeast and south. The applicant confirms that there have been signs of historic instability of the slopes and that during construction of the A12 (T) slope failure resulted in extensive slope remediation works and underdrainage provision. The applicant confirms that records from the Resident Engineer for the road construction indicated drainage measures being constructed from a bench about 19m AOD to below the base of the quarry floor which is anticipated has been partially filled to below -3m AOD and water levels of between -2m AOD to +2m AOD. • This void is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LoWS) due to its invertebrate interest and associated habitats established post mineral extraction. Land immediately to the north of the void and within the application boundary comprises grassland that was previously worked and restored. Within this grassland area, some ponds have previously been created for nature conservation translocation associated with the southern void permission. Water levels within the northern void are maintained, given proximity of the A12 (T), by pumping from the southern void into the eastern arm of the Sandon Brook that flows through the complex. • Southern Void – A former quarry void separated from the northern void by the main site haul road. This area is subject to an extant permission for the infilling with inert materials under ESS/30/11/CHL with restoration scheduled to be completed by December 2017. The restored land would then accommodate agriculture and woodland together with public rights of way. • Former processing plant and stockpiling area. Situated east of Sandon Brook and accessed via a bridge on the site access road. This area comprises some redundant plant, hardstandings two ponds formerly used for water management and the site security caravan. The land previously accommodated mineral stockpiling, silt lagoons as well as a concrete batching plant. The above three areas are located within a generally agricultural landscape of hedgerows, fields and mature trees. The Sandon Brook which flows south to north approaches the Sandon complex from the south and at this point comprises an eastern and western arm. The eastern arm of the Sandon Brook approaches the quarry complex from the south east and forms the eastern boundary of the southern void then crosses through the application land dividing the northern void area from the processing plant area. The brook then continues north forming the north eastern boundary of the northern void area before exiting the application land and joining the western arm of the brook just before Woodhill Road. The western arm of Sandon Brook first encounters the Sandon Complex when if flows beneath the haul road near the site entrance onto Molram's Lane then flows north east to flow beneath the A12(T) emerging the other side to form the north western boundary of the northern void. The brook then continues north to join with its eastern arm. At its closest point the eastern arm of the Sandon Brook lies 30 metres from the eastern edge of the northern void. Between the two void areas is situated the site weighbridge and portacabin style site office and car parking area. Further north framing the complex beyond the nature conservation ponds and some fields is Woodhall Road linking Sandon Village with Danbury. Immediately east of the processing plant area lies a small industrial estate that separates the plant area from Mayes Road that provides a link between Woodhall Road and Butts Green located south east of the quarry complex. A number of residential properties lie either side of Mayes Road separated by fields and hedgerows from the quarry complex. Sandon Hall (c 250 m south of southern void) set in its own grounds forms the quarry complex’s southern boundary. Nearest properties are some 120 metres to the north west beyond the A12 in Sandon. Sandon Lodge (c180 m) and Bridge Farm (c200 m) are located north and north east off Woodhall Road. Bridge Cottage (20 m to south) and Brookside Diary (c40 m north) are located adjacent the site entrance on Molrams Lane. The complex is affected by a number of public rights of way: Right of Way 232_7 passes through the site following the western bank of the eastern arm of the Sandon Brook crossing the haul road and continuing southwards to the east of the southern void and past Sandon Hall. Public Right of Way 232_5 approaches the Sandon complex from the west follows part of the site haul road before linking at the A12(T) overbridge with Right of Way 232_26 which follows the western boundary line of the A12(T) northwards to link with Sandon Village. Public Right of Way 232_5 continues over the bridge before turning southwards before skirting around Sandon Hall. Planning History The Sandon Quarry complex has a long mineral and waste planning history. Still of relevance is an Interim Development Order (ref no: IDO/GHL/2/92A) known as an IDO. This Order covered most of the worked out site and also extended over the land identified as the plant processing area. The IDO permits mineral extraction until 2042 with restoration through infilling with inert materials to restore the land back to a grazing and amenity afteruse. The status of the land affected by the IDO is referred to in planning terms as currently being dormant. Of the two void areas the applicant confirms that the northern void has no restoration commitment and therefore there is a necessity, given the proximity of the A12 (T), for continual dewatering to maintain water levels below natural ground levels. Currently water levels in the northern void are maintained by pumping from the southern void (so allowing natural flow through the intervening strata) and discharging into the eastern arm of the Sandon Brook. Planning approval for infilling the southern void with restoration to agriculture and woodland under ESS/21/92/CHL was subsequently varied by ESS/30/11/CHL which extended the restoration date until 31 st December 2017. Traffic associated with the southern void development are subject to a HGV routeing agreement such that vehicles approaching from the south on the A1114 “ uses the northbound off slip and turns right into Southend Road to cross over the A1114 before travelling south down Molrams Lane and turning left into Sandon Quarry. Traffic arriving at Sandon Quarry from the north on the A1114 leaves on the southbound off slip before turning right onto Molrams Lane and immediately left into the site. All traffic leaving the site turns left onto the southbound slip road to the A1114. Vehicles leaving the site and needing to travel north use the A1114/A12(T)/A130 junction to turn around and travel north on the A111 4”. There are a number of ancillary permissions related to site fencing as well as the siting of a security caravan within the complex. The Essex and Southend Waste Local Plan Adopted September 2001 identifies the Sandon quarry as Site LNI.2 and WM6 these designations encompass the whole of the complex east of the A12 (T) (the present application footprint plus the southern void).
Recommended publications
  • Draft Site Allocations & Development Management Plan
    Braintree District Council Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Plan Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report – Non Technical Summary January 2013 Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Plan ........................................ 1 1.3 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment .................................... 1 1.4 Progress to Date ................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Methodology........................................................................................................................ 3 1.6 The Aim and Structure of this Report .................................................................................. 3 2 Sustainability Context, Baseline and Objectives.............................................................. 4 2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Plans & Programmes .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Fire & Rescue Service
    Essex County Fire & Rescue Service Our Values: Respect, Accountability, Openness and Involvement Strategic Risk Assessment of the Medium to Longer-Term Service Operating Environment 2009 – 2010 2 Countywide Review 2009 Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................................................................................4 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................5 3. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................6 4. Climate Change in East of England ................................................................................10 5. Demographics of Essex ......................................................................................................22 6. Diversity .......................................................................................................................................26 7. Older People in Essex ...........................................................................................................32 8. County Development and Transport Infrastructure ...............................................40 9. The Changing Face of Technology ................................................................................57 10. Terrorism .....................................................................................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council 10 Year Plan for Essex Schools Places
    Braiswick Primary School, Colchester 10 Year Plan Meeting the demand for school places in Essex 2019-2028 For more information go to www.essex.gov.uk/schoolorganisation Contents 1. Executive Summary 2 1.1 Purpose and scope 2 1.2 School Organisation 2 1.3 Areas of growth and additional places planned 3 1.4 Funding and Delivery 5 2. Introduction – Planning for school places 6 2.1 Statutory duty and available funding 6 2.2 Forecasting methodology 6 2.3 Academies and Free Schools 8 2.4 Factors that influence planning for school places 8 2.5 New Housing, S106 and Community Infrastructure Levy 9 3. Forecasts and Plans 12 3.1 Mid Essex 13 3.1.1 Braintree 14 3.1.2 Chelmsford 21 3.1.3 Maldon 28 3.2 North East Essex 32 3.2.1 Colchester 33 3.2.2 Tendring 39 3.3 South Essex 44 3.3.1 Basildon 45 3.3.2 Brentwood 49 3.3.3 Castle Point 52 3.3.4 Rochford 55 3.4 West Essex 59 3.4.1 Epping Forest 60 3.4.2 Harlow 66 3.4.3 Uttlesford 69 1 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose and scope The purpose of the 10 year plan is to set out: The demand for school places in the next 10 years (from academic year 19/20 to academic year 28/29) for each of the districts and the authority’s plans to address this demand. Solutions already in the pipeline that will meet the forecast demand for school places.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife Site Review 2016 Appendix 1
    APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY TABLE OF 2016 LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES Sites retain their original numbers, as identified in 2004, so any gaps within numbers 1-150 are where Sites have been dropped from the LoWS register. Sites 151-186 are new LoWS. Site Reference No. and Name Area (hectares) Grid Reference Ch1 Horsfrithpark Wood, Radley Green 6.22 TL 61610434 Ch2 Bushey-hays Spring, Roxwell 0.49 TL 61710847 Ch3 River Can Floodplain, Good Easter 7.85 TL 61811208 Ch4 Skreens Wood, Roxwell 3.3 TL 62060920 Ch5 Sandpit Wood, Roxwell 2.32 TL 62180745 Ch6 Parson’s Spring, Loves Green 27.48 TL 62290271 Ch7 Barrow Wood/Birch Spring, Loves Green 78.64 TL 62820236 Ch9 Engine Spring/Ring Grove, Roxwell 2.25 TL 63320768 Ch10 Hopgarden Spring, Roxwell 1.44 TL 63520787 Ch11 Cooley Spring, Roxwell 1.79 TL 63630903 Ch12 Chalybeate Spring Meadows, Good Easter 2.84 TL 63611159 Ch13 Road Verge 9, Roxwell 0.05 TL 63650997 Ch14 Writtle High Woods, Loves Green 49.64 TL 64010257 Ch16 Boyton Cross Verges, Roxwell 0.75 TL 64440973 Ch17 Nightingale Wood, Mashbury 4.86 TL 65211065 Ch18 Lady Grove, Writtle 5.19 TL 65530540 Ch19 Writtlepark Woods, Margaretting 48.91 TL 65650294 Ch20 Bushey Wood, Margaretting 3.04 TL 65700146 Ch21 James’s Spring, Margaretting 2.3 TL 65840242 Ch22 Great/Little Edney Woods, Edney Common 25.36 TL 65810385 Ch23 Lee Wood, Writtle 3.24 TL 65870474 Ch24 Osbourne’s Wood, Margaretting 1.89 TL 66000112 Ch26 Cow Watering Lane Verge, Writtle 0.05 TL 66540703 Ch28 Pleshey Castle, Pleshey 3.15 TL 66531441 Ch29 Rook Wood, Margaretting 4.19 TQ 66749985 Ch30 King
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 13
    THE ESSEX FIELD CLUB HEADQUARTERS: THE PASSMORE EDWARDS MUSEUM, ROMFORD ROAD, STRATFORD, LONDON, E15 4LZ NEWSLETTER NO. 13 March 1995 THE THAMES GATEWAY - THE EAST THAMES CORRIDOR I am grateful to Ken Hill in bringing to my notice the Thames Gateway Planning Framework Consultation Draft. This sets out a framework for a sustained programme of regeneration and development in the East Thames Corridor, extending from Docklands in London to Tilbury in Essex and the Isle of Sheppey in Kent. The intention seems to be to encourage major development of this area, "an area of opportunity which is at the threshold of Europe's largest city and the expanding continental marketplace." This does not bode well for the remaining sites of wildlife importance in the area. The Thames grazing marshes have long been recognised as of national importance for many plants, birds and invertebrates and there is increasing evidence that south Essex contains other sites of great importance for wildlife eg on terrace gravels and chalk. Many areas of importance for nature conservation in South Essex and North Kent are therefore encompassed by this report which only recognises those designated as SSSIs (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) or SPAs (Special Protection Areas) and although the document advises a new approach of greater care for the environment, nature conservation seems to be only a small part of this consideration. The various development opportunities mapped out give little cause for optimism on the future of existing SSSIs such as Erith, Crayford and Dartford Marshes whose existence does not even seem to be recognised.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0Ааlandscape Character of Braintree District
    3.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF BRAINTREE DISTRICT 33 3.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF BRAINTREE DISTRICT 3.1 General 3.1.1 This section of the report provides the detailed ‘profiles’ of Landscape Character Areas within Braintree District, structured as follows: Location of character area (map) Boundaries of character area (map) Photograph Key characteristics Overall character description Visual characteristics Historic land use Ecological features Key planning and land management issues Sensitivities to change Proposed landscape strategy objectives Suggested landscape planning guidelines Suggested land management guidelines The profiles should be read as a whole when used to inform decision making. Where Landscape Character Areas fall within two or more adjacent District/Borough areas included in the Study report, the same profile has been included within the respective section. In such instances, a cross­reference is noted in the respective Character Area profile(s). Reference should also be made to other studies for neighbouring authority areas including: Colchester Borough Landscape Character Assessment. Suffolk Landscape Character Assessment (in preparation). 3.1.2 The following Landscape Character Types and Areas have been identified within Braintree District (see Figure 3.1), and are described in the following sections: A ­ River Valley Landscapes A2 ­ Stour River Valley A4 ­ Colne River Valley A5 ­ Pant River Valley A9 ­ Blackwater River Valley A10 ­ Brain River Valley A12 ­ Pods Brook River Valley B ­ Farmland Plateau Landscapes B2 ­ Hempstead
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife Site Review 2016 Appendix 2 Sites 1-90
    APPENDIX 2 Part 1, Sites 1-90 REGISTER OF CHELMSFORD LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES KEY Highlighted LoWS Adjacent Chelmsford LoWS Adjacent LoWS (other local authority) Potential Chelmsford LoWS Sites of Special Scientific Interest EECOS, April 2016 Chelmsford City Council Local Wildlife Sites Review 2016 Ch1 Horsfrithpark Wood, Radley Green (6.22 ha) TL 61610434 Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey® mapping by permission of Ordnance Survey® on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Licence number AL 100020327 The majority of this woodland is dominated by Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) coppice and forms the high canopy. Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) and Field Maple (Acer campestre) are generally found at sub-canopy level. Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) and Elder (Sambucus nigra) form part of a well-developed shrub layer, though open areas allow light to penetrate to ground level. The ground flora has Dog’s Mercury (Mercurialis perennis) and Lesser Celandine (Ficaria verna) in abundance. Other recorded species include Bluebell (Hyacinthoides non-scripta), Three-nerved Sandwort (Moehringia trinervia) and Wood Speedwell (Veronica montana). Ownership and Access Thought to be in private ownership, with no public access. The wood can be viewed from a public right of way that runs along the eastern and southern boundaries. Habitats of Principal Importance in England Lowland Mixed Deciduous Woodland Selection Criterion HC1 Ancient Woodland Sites EECOS, April 2016 Chelmsford City Council Local Wildlife Sites Review 2016 Rationale The structure and composition of this wood supports documentary evidence that this is an ancient woodland site. Condition Statement Neglected. Management Issues As with all old coppice woodlands, a resumption of coppicing is usually beneficial to maintain the high biodiversity of such sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating a Wild Year in Essex Essex Wildlife
    Essex Wildlife Trust Annual Review 2017 Celebrating a wild year in Essex Protecting Wildlife for the Future and for the People of Essex From the Chairman I am delighted to welcome you to the 2017 Annual Review for Essex Wildlife Trust, my second year as your Chair of Trustees. I am very pleased to report that the Trust continues to strengthen and to grow in so many positive ways. We now have more than 37,000 members across Essex, more than ever before – so, a huge thanks to each and every one of you for supporting our work. The footfall across our 11 visitor centres topped the 1,000,000 mark for the first time, showing that there is an ever- increasing interest in the wildlife and natural landscapes of our beautiful county. As a result, the tills in our shops and cafés rang like never before, generating much needed additional income for the conservation work across our network of reserves. We delivered record numbers of education sessions and children’s birthday parties, engaging with thousands of young people. At a time when the Brexit process continues to offer an uncertain picture for the long-term future for some of our key sources of income, it is heartening to see our core activities go from strength to strength, building firm foundations for the years ahead. Of course, none of this would be possible without the input of our dedicated and inspirational staff team, together with the exceptional contribution and commitment of our army of volunteers, who support the organisation in so many different ways – river and coastal wardens, kitchen helpers, visitor centres ‘meeters and greeters’, reserves work party members, magazine deliverers and so many more.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Regulation Committee
    Development and Regulation Committee Committee Room 1, Friday, 27 January 10:30 County Hall, 2017 Chelmsford, Essex Quorum: 3 Membership: Councillor R Boyce Chairman Councillor J Abbott Councillor K Bobbin Councillor M Ellis Councillor A Erskine Councillor C Guglielmi Councillor J Jowers Councillor S Lissimore Councillor J Lodge Councillor M Mackrory Councillor Lady P Newton Councillor J Reeves For information about the meeting please ask for: Matthew Waldie, Committee Officer Telephone: 033301 34583 Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 176 Essex County Council and Committees Information All Council and Committee Meetings are held in public unless the business is exempt in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1972. Most meetings are held at County Hall, Chelmsford, CM1 1LX. A map and directions to County Hall can be found at the following address on the Council’s website: http://www.essex.gov.uk/Your-Council/Local-Government-Essex/Pages/Visit-County- Hall.aspx There is ramped access to the building for wheelchair users and people with mobility disabilities. The Council Chamber and Committee Rooms are accessible by lift and are located on the first and second floors of County Hall. If you have a need for documents in the following formats, large print, Braille, on disk or in alternative languages and easy read please contact the Committee Officer before the meeting takes place. If you have specific access requirements such as access to induction loops, a signer, level access or information in Braille please inform the Committee Officer before the meeting takes place. For any further information contact the Committee Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT POLICY COMMITTEE 16 February 2017
    DEVELOPMENT POLICY COMMITTEE 16 February 2017 AGENDA ITEM 6 Subject GREEN WEDGES AND GREEN CORRIDORS: DEFINING CHELMSFORD’S RIVER VALLEYS Report by DIRECTOR OF SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES Enquiries contact: Claire Stuckey, Principal Planning Officer, [email protected], (01245) 606475 Purpose To present the Green Wedges and Green Corridors: Defining Chelmsford’s River Valleys report and to seek approval to publish it as part of the new Local Plan evidence base. Recommendations 1 That the Committee notes this report. 2 That the Committee approves the Green Wedges and Green Corridors: Defining Chelmsford’s River Valleys report to be published as part of the Chelmsford City Council Local Plan evidence base. Corporate Implications Legal: The report will support the implementation of current adopted policies and underpin the Council’s future Local Plan, by providing a robust and credible evidence base document. Financial: None. Budgetary provision has been made for the report costs. Personnel: None. Risk Management: Risk of evidence base not being endorsed, which could delay the timetable for preparing the new Local Plan. Equalities and Diversity: The report will help inform decisions on future development proposals within Green Wedges and Green Corridors across the City Council area. This will have an impact upon equality/diversity. The report itself is an evidence base document which is not subject to an equalities impact assessment. 1 Health and Safety: None. IT: None. Other: None. Consultees CCC – Sustainable Communities Directorate
    [Show full text]
  • Chelmsford City Council Local Wildlife Site Review 2016
    CHELMSFORD CITY COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2016 CHELMSFORD CITY COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2016 April 2016 Prepared by Essex Ecology Services Ltd. EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 Chelmsford City Council Civic Centre Client Duke Street Chelmsford CM1 1JE Client Representative Claire Stuckey, Senior Planning Officer Author Adrian Knowles BSc FRES MIEEM, Senior Ecologist Approved By Neil Harvey BSc MIEEM, Manager of EECOS Report Status Final Date of Issue 7th April 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EECOS, April 2016 Chelmsford City Council Local Wildlife Sites Review 2016 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature and Definitions The very first report to identify a standardised suite of important wildlife sites within what was then Chelmsford Borough, produced in 1992, coined the term “Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation” (SINC). This was followed, in 2004, by a review of these sites under the term “Wildlife Site”. The current, generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS) has now been adopted throughout Essex. Where a building, other property or location is used in the name of a LoWS it is not being implied that ownership of that LoWS is associated with the property named. It is merely a descriptive use for ease of locating a piece of land that might have no publicly recognised name or other obvious geographical location. The Local Wildlife Sites Partnership for Essex would be pleased to receive details of more widely recognised names where they exist. In the report, when a location is referred to as a Site (with a capital S) this is an abbreviation that means it is a Local Wildlife Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Bradwell
    Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Bradwell EN-6: Revised draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation Planning for new energy infrastructure October 2010 Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report For Bradwell Appraisal of Sustainability of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement The Appraisal of Sustainability (AoS), incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment, of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement (Nuclear NPS) has been undertaken at a strategic level. It considers the effects of the proposed policy at a national level and the sites to be assessed for their suitability for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025. These strategic appraisals are part of an ongoing assessment process that started in March 2008 and, following completion of this AoS, will continue with project level assessments when developers make applications for development consent in relation to specific projects. Applications for development consents to the Infrastructure Planning Commission will need to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement having been the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment. The AoS/SEA Reports are presented in the following documents: AoS Non-Technical Summary Main AoS Report of revised draft Nuclear NPS Introduction Approach and Methods Alternatives Radioactive Waste Findings Summary of Sites Technical Appendices Annexes to Main AoS Report: Reports on Sites Site AoS Reports Technical Appendices All documents are available on the website of the Department of Energy and Climate Change at http://www.energynpsconsultation.decc.gov.uk This document is the Appendices to the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Bradwell. These appendices have been prepared by the Department of Energy and Climate Change with expert input from a team of specialist planning and environmental consultancies led by MWH UK Ltd with Enfusion Ltd, Nicholas Pearsons Associates Ltd, Studsvik UK Ltd and Metoc plc.
    [Show full text]