DOCSLIB.ORG

Telling Time for Archaeologists George L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 29 Article 2 2000 Telling Time for Archaeologists George L. Miller Patricia Samford Ellen Shlasko Andrew Madsen Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Miller, George L.; Samford, Patricia; Shlasko, Ellen; and Madsen, Andrew (2000) "Telling Time for Archaeologists," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 29 29, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol29/iss1/2 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol29/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Telling Time for Archaeologists Cover Page Footnote I would like to thank Robert H. Hunter Jr. and The hipsC tone Foundation of Milwaukee, Wisconsin for providing color photographs from their journal Ceramics in America to illustrate this article. The first issue of Ceramics in America was published during the summer of 2001. I would also like to thank Anthony J. McNichol for the glass drawings he did for this publication. I began compiling this list of dates while employed at Parks Canada and much of the information came from my former colleagues in Ottawa. This article is available in Northeast Historical Archaeology: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol29/iss1/2 Northeast Historical ArchaeologyNol. 29, 2000 1 Telling Time for Archaeologists George L. Miller, with contributions by Patricia Samford, Ellen Shlasko, and Andrew Madsen This essay presents an accumulation of data on the dates for common types of artifacts found on archaeo­ logical sites from the historical period. These dates come from a variety of sources and include a mix of types of dates. These dates are based on such things as patents, pattern registrations, dates when commercial pro­ duction began, estimates of when production stopped, and the popularity ranges for various styles of wares based on makers' marks. The introductory essay discusses some of the problems in the sources of the dates presented. Ce texte presente une accumulation de donnees sur les dates de types d'artefacts communs trouves sur des sites archeologiques de Ia periode historique. Ces dates proviennent de diverses sources et sont de plusieurs natures. Elles se basent sur divers indicateurs tels brevets, enregistrements de modeles, dates de debut de production commerciale, estimations du moment ou a cesse Ia production et periodes de popularite de divers styles d'articles d'apres les marques des fabricants. Le texte evoque certains des problemes que posent les sources des dates presentees. Introduction Sources for Dating Artifacts Publication of Ivor Noel Hume's A Guide to Not all dates are created equal. Dates for Artifacts of Colonial America in 1970 provided artifacts used to interpret archaeological con­ historical archaeologists with their major texts come from a variety of sources that source for identification and dating of histor­ should be taken into account during the inter­ ical artifacts. This text became the standard pretation process. For example, consider the reference for dating 17th- and 18th-century following types of sources for artifact dates. artifacts and to some extent artifacts from the early 19th century. As such, it is the most Group 1: Dated objects cited work by historical archaeologists. In this seminal work, Noel Hume presented in clear Coins, silver touch mark dates, armorial and simple terms the importance of and use of decorated wares, presentation pieces and the concept of terminus post quem dates for dated ceramics and glass, manufacturers' date dating archaeological contexts. The latest­ codes such as those used by Wedgwood, made artifact in an archaeological context rep­ Worcester, Owens-Illinois Glass, and others resents the earliest date that the context could (FIG. 1). One obvious question is what does the have been deposited (Noel Hume 1969: 11). date represent? Is it the date the object was Unfortunately, the dating of contexts by their made, or does the date commemorate some terminus post quem artifact is an under-utilized event or relate to a presentation of the object? concept in historical archaeology. For some, the mean ceramic date seems to be the focus of Group 2: Known introduction dates analysis. Knowing the mid-date of a context Patented objects, design registrations, and not knowing if it was for an assemblage makers' marks, model years, known date of that represents ten years or 100 years seems introduction, dates of changes in technology, rather short sighted. It is hoped that the dates dates of changes in style, marks for institution­ provided here will help archaeologists become ally owned wares such as used by military more familiar with artifacts and their regiments, hospitals, hotels, schools, etc (FIGS. chronologies. 2-4). Many of these dates have been estab- 2 Telling Time for Archaeologists/Miller Figure 1. The base to a bottle with an Owens-Illinois Figure 3. Continuous-Thread Finish. This finish on Glass Company mark. The bottle has an Owens suc­ glass containers had one continuous line that over­ tion scar to the left and top right of the parison mold laps itself for a quick and easy opening lid. The line. This from the knife that cuts the glass off once glass industry came together to set the first stan­ it has been sucked up from the glass tank. Owens dards for the Continuous-Thread Finish in 1919 (Lief scars are very distinct, and sometimes are carried up 1965: 27-29). The closure became very popular and onto the heel of the container, especially on small basically replaced the cork for most containers. bottles. The Owens Automatic Bottle Blowing Drawing by Anthony J. McNichol. machine was patented in 1904. Suction scars are common on bottles made from 1903 until around 1940. Drawing by Anthony J. McNichol. • Figure 2. Lug top finish to a machine-made bottle. Figure 4. Bail and yoke "Lighting Stopper" stopper. This type of closure was almost impossible to make Lief lists this stopper as being patented in 1882, but a on mouth-blown bottles. Lug top closures were patent date on the hard rubber cork on a Lighting introduced on machine-made bottles in 1906. There stopper in Miller's collection has the date "Jan. 5, are many styles of lug top closures and they are still 1875." These closures were common on beer bottles in common use today. Drawing by Anthony J. and to a lesser extent on pop bottles until ca. 1910. McNichol. They lost their market position to the crown stopper which was patented in 1892. Drawing by Anthony J. McNichol. Northeast Historical ArchaeologyIV ol. 29, 2000 3 Tablel. Chronology for shell-edged earthenware, after Miller and Hunter1990, keyed to Figure 5. Figure Style Rim Mean beginning Mean end date date 5A,B Rococo Impressed curved lines 1784 1812 Impressed curved lines Even scalloped 1802 1832 5D Impressed straight lines Even scalloped 1809 1831 5C Impressed bud motif Even scalloped 1813 1834 5E,F Embossed patterns Patterned scalloping 1823 1835 5G,H Impressed repetitive patterns Unscalloped 1841 1857 Unmolded Unscalloped 1874 1884 D H Figure 5. Bisque fited shell-edged waster sherds from Staffordshire. The chronological information on these rim types is presented in Table 1. 4 Telling Time for Archaeologists/Miller lished from documents such as patent office beginning and end dates for the seven major records, research in city directories, published decorative types (TAB. 1; FIG. 5). histories, and other such sources. Taken at face value, the above series would suggest that shell-edged wares were not being Group 3: Dates by association produced between 1835 and 1840 and between 1858 and 1873. Throughout the 1830s, shell In most cases artifacts date the sites and edge was the most common type of plate contexts in which they are found. In some being sold in the American market. A close cases, such as shipwrecks, sites destroyed by look at Samford's data may reveal similar time catastrophic events, sites occupied for very gaps. short time periods, or activities such as mili­ Andrew Madsen's data are based on Chi­ tary battles, the site often provides better dates nese porcelain decorated with English armo­ for the objects found than our established arti­ rial designs. The British East India Company fact chronologies. In these cases, the dates are controlled the importation of Chinese porce­ for a period when the artifacts were in use and lain to England. Because of a dispute with the deposited and generally do not represent the London merchants who sold the Chinese beginning or end date of the artifacts recov­ porcelain imported by the Company, the Com­ ered. pany stopped importing these wares in 1791 (Godden 1980: 28). This put an end to English Group 4: Artifact dates generated by accu­ armorials on Chinese porcelain at a time when mulated data the American trade in Chinese porcelain was The earliest example of this for historical taking off. Thus the dates that Madsen gener­ archaeology is the Binford clay pipe stem for­ ated for the later patterns may have lasted mula dates based on the research by Pinky longer in the American market (FIGS. 6-8). Harrington (Binford 1978). Later examples Anyone using the dates and chronologies in include Stanley South's mean ceramic date for­ this paper should take into consideration how mula, based on data provided by Ivor Noel the dates were generated and what the limita­ Hume (South 1978). Others have used accu­ tions might be on their accuracy. mulated dates from artifacts to generate Many of the dates from the following list ranges of popularity.
Recommended publications
  • 001. Outstanding Double Stamped John Bell Sitting Molded Spaniel Dog W/ Collar & Chain, 8 ½” Tall

    001. Outstanding Double Stamped John Bell Sitting Molded Spaniel Dog W/ Collar & Chain, 8 ½” Tall

    Pa. OnSite Auction Saturday Nov. 17, 2018 Charles & Elizabeth Roby Auction Sale Catalog 001. Outstanding double stamped John Bell sitting molded Spaniel dog w/ collar & chain, 8 ½” tall. 002. Very good splint basket w/ green paint & wooden handle. 003. “White Utica” bulbous stoneware jug w/ blue decoration. 004. Blue & white granite coffee boiler. 005. Early oblong wooden trencher maintaining some original bark. 006. Signed “H.W. Hayden pat. Dec. 16, 1851 brass bucket. 007. Early iron grappling hook w/ loop top. 008. Cornucopia & eagle w/ shield dark green glass flask. 009. 1994 Book w/ dust cover: “The Pottery Of The Shenandoah Valley Region” by H.E. Comstock, signed “To Charles Roby Good Luck In Collecting J. Bell Pottery H.E. Comstock 11/10/95”. 010. Very good olive green glass nice form demijohn. 011. Early 3 legged iron hearth frypan w/ wrought iron handle. 012. “Wm. Radam’s Microbe Killer No. 1” stoneware jug. 013. Very good oak splint flower gathering basket w/ full wooden handle & rest stops on base. 014. Very good wooden dry measure w/ iron bands. 015. Large pair tailors scissors signed “R. Heinisch Inventor Newark N.J.” 016. Large green glass bottle “Clarke’s Vegetable Sherry Wine Bitters Sharon Mass.”\ 017. 4 pc. Kitchen Tool Set: wrought iron fork, brass spatula w/ wrought iron handle, brass bowl ladle & strainer both w/ wrought iron handles, all pcs. signed “F.B.S. Canton O. Pat. Jan 26, 1886”. 018. Sheet iron cow or goat bell. 019. Signed “J.T. 1978” wrought iron adjustable candle lamp. 020. 12 count candle mold.
  • Pekin Japan – a Pattern with a Long Run

    Pekin Japan – a Pattern with a Long Run

    Pekin Japan – a Pattern with a Long Run By Connie Rogers n our work in the TCC Database, we cessful Ashworth firm continued Ifind that some patterns are short- from 1860-1968 when it was re- lived. Others were popular enough named ‘Mason’s Ironstone China that when the pottery that pro- Ltd.’ This paper will discuss and duced them went out of busi- illustrate some of the Pekin Ja- ness, another pottery bought pan pattern variations of the the copper plates and continued two firms that helped to keep the pattern for many years un- it popular for nearly a century. der different marks – and occa- Now, the name: Pekin Ja- sionally a new name. In the case pan. Where did that come of Pekin Japan, the pattern and from? Pekin surely relates to its name were found in a pattern the city of Peking in China. Ja- book, dated c. 1825-30 from the C. pan is a totally different country. J. Mason & Co. In Mason Porcelain Was this Mason’s way of choos- & Ironstone 1796-1853, the authors, ing a name for an Oriental land- Reginald Haggar & Elizabeth Adams, scape that was not directly copied illustrate a page from the pattern book Figure 1. from a Chinese Export pattern? By 1825- in Plate 101, and a 10 inch plate with 30 when this pattern came out, there were Pekin Japan, c. 1825-30 in Plate 102. The pat- thousands of pieces of Chinese Export tern was first produced by the Masons in an porcelain in Britain, and many of the pat- underglaze blue transfer print as seen here terns were known in general as “Chinese in Figure 1 with its mark (1a).
  • The Perils of Periodization: Roman Ceramics in Britain After 400 CE KEITH J

    The Perils of Periodization: Roman Ceramics in Britain After 400 CE KEITH J

    The Perils of Periodization: Roman Ceramics in Britain after 400 CE KEITH J. FITZPATRICK-MATTHEWS North Hertfordshire Museum [email protected] ROBIN FLEMING Boston College [email protected] Abstract: The post-Roman Britons of the fifth century are a good example of people invisible to archaeologists and historians, who have not recognized a distinctive material culture for them. We propose that this material does indeed exist, but has been wrongly characterized as ‘Late Roman’ or, worse, “Anglo-Saxon.” This pottery copied late-Roman forms, often poorly or in miniature, and these pots became increasingly odd over time; local production took over, often by poorly trained potters. Occasionally, potters made pots of “Anglo-Saxon” form using techniques inherited from Romano-British traditions. It is the effect of labeling the material “Anglo-Saxon” that has rendered it, its makers, and its users invisible. Key words: pottery, Romano-British, early medieval, fifth-century, sub-Roman Archaeologists rely on the well-dated, durable material culture of past populations to “see” them. When a society exists without such a mate- rial culture or when no artifacts are dateable to a period, its population effectively vanishes. This is what happens to the indigenous people of fifth-century, lowland Britain.1 Previously detectable through their build- ings, metalwork, coinage, and especially their ceramics, these people disappear from the archaeological record c. 400 CE. Historians, for their part, depend on texts to see people in the past. Unfortunately, the texts describing Britain in the fifth-century were largely written two, three, or even four hundred years after the fact.
  • Collecting Vintage & Antique Milk Glass

    Collecting Vintage & Antique Milk Glass

    COLLECTING MARCH 9, 2020 ADIRONDACK GIRL @ HEART MILK GLASS Some History Venetian glass makers devel- oped milky white glass some- time in the the 16th century and called it opal glass. The term we use today, milk glass, may have first been used by the Victorians who fell in love with it, due in part to its similarity to porcelain, which only the very wealthiest families could afford. After falling out of favor in the early 20th century, companies like Fenton, Westmoreland, and Indiana Glass ushered in a "golden age" of milk glass that extended After another serious down-turn, this simple white from about 1940 to 1970. glass entered our decorating consciousness again in the 2000's and it remains popular even now, in Victorian milk glass is often 2020. rather ornate and somewhat Interestingly enough, milk glass comes in a variety translucent, while newer pieces of colors, including, pink, yellow, blue, brown, and tend to be simpler and opaque. black. [You can see some examples in the blog post on this topic.] Quality milk glass has no mold marks and has a smooth, glossy Helpful Hints: finish. Florist grade glass is often I find milk glass most cheaply at garage sales, textured and contains unsightly sometimes for as little as a quarter and at thrift mold marks. stores, usually for $2-3/piece. Buy it only if you love it because you are unlikely to Fenton & Westmoreland Marks make a lot of profit on it if you try to sell it(!). If you want to sell it, colored milk glass sells better for me than plain white.
  • Part 5: Exploration & Excavation

    Part 5: Exploration & Excavation

    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar C.S.S. Alabama: An Illustrated History Library Special Collections Fall 10-11-2017 Part 5: Exploration & Excavation Jack L. Dickinson Marshall University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/css_al Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dickinson, Jack L., "Part 5: Exploration & Excavation" (2017). C.S.S. Alabama: An Illustrated History. 4. http://mds.marshall.edu/css_al/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Special Collections at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in C.S.S. Alabama: An Illustrated History by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CSS Alabama : An Illustrated History In Six Parts: You are here Part 1: Building of Ship 290 Part 2: Officers and Crew Part 3: Cruise of the Alabama Part 4: Battle with USS Kearsarge ---> Part 5: Exploration & Excavation Part 6: Miscellaneous and Bibliography (the Alabama Claims, poems, music, sword of Raphael Semmes) To read any of the other parts, return to the menu and select that part to be downloaded. Designed and Assembled by Jack L. Dickinson Marshall University Special Collections 2017 Investigation of the Confederate Commerce Raider CSS Alabama 2001 CSS Alabama Association P. O. Box 2744 Mobile, Alabama 36652-2744 Association CSS Alabama 34 Avenue de New York 75116 Paris Investigation of the Confederate Commerce Raider CSS Alabama 2001 Submitted to: Joint French American Scientific Committee for the CSS Alabama Submitted by: Gordon P.
  • 2019-2020 Year in Review

    2019-2020 Year in Review

    Table of Contents 3 Director’s Welcome 7 Objects in Space: A Conversation with Barry Bergdoll and Charlotte Vignon 17 Glorious Excess: Dr. Susan Weber on Victorian Majolica 23 Object Lessons: Inside the Lab for Teen Thinkers 33 Teaching 43 Faculty Year in Review 50 Internships, Admissions, and Student Travel and Research 55 Research and Exhibitions 69 Gallery 82 Publications 83 Digital Media Lab 85 Library 87 Public Programs 97 Fundraising and Special Events Eileen Gray. Transat chair owned by the Maharaja of Indore, from the Manik Bagh Palace, 1930. Lacquered wood, nickel-plated brass, leather, canvas. Private collection. Copyright 2014 Phillips Auctioneers LLC. All Rights Reserved. Director’s Welcome For me, Bard Graduate Center’s Quarter-Century Celebration this year was, at its heart, a tribute to our alumni. From our first, astonishing incoming class to our most recent one (which, in a first for BGC, I met over Zoom), our students are what I am most proud of. That first class put their trust in a fledgling institution that burst upon the academic art world to rectify an as-yet-undiagnosed need for a place to train the next generation of professional students of objects. Those beginning their journey this fall now put their trust in an established leader who they expect will prepare them to join a vital field of study, whether in the university, museum, or market. What a difference a generation makes! I am also intensely proud of how seriously BGC takes its obligation to develop next-generation scholarship in decorative arts, design his- tory, and material culture.
  • WHITE IRONSTONE NOTES VOLUME 3 No

    WHITE IRONSTONE NOTES VOLUME 3 No

    WHITE IRONSTONE NOTES VOLUME 3 No. 2 FALL 1996 By Bev & Ernie Dieringer three sons, probably Joseph, The famous architect Mies van was the master designer of the der Rohe said, “God is in the superb body shapes that won a details.” God must have been in prize at the Crystal Palace rare form in the guise of the Exhibition in 1851. master carver who designed the Jewett said in his 1883 book handles and finials for the The Ceramic Art of Great Mayer Brothers’ Classic Gothic Britain, “Joseph died prema- registered in 1847. On page 44 turely through excessive study in Wetherbee’s collector’s guide, and application of his art. He there is an overview of the and his brothers introduced Mayer’s Gothic. However, we many improvements in the man- are going to indulge ourselves ufacture of pottery, including a and perhaps explain in words stoneware of highly vitreous and pictures, why we lovingly quality. This stoneware was collect this shape. capable of whithstanding varia- On this page, photos show tions of temperature which details of handles on the under- occurred in the brewing of tea.” trays of three T. J. & J. Mayer For this profile we couldn’t soup tureens. Top: Classic find enough of any one T. J. & J. Octagon. Middle: Mayer’s Mayer body shape, so we chose Long Octagon. Bottom: Prize a group of four shapes, includ- Bloom. ing the two beautiful octagon Elijah Mayer, patriarch of a dinner set shapes, the Classic famous family of master potters, Gothic tea and bath sets and worked in the last quarter of the Prize Bloom.
  • Pêcheurs, Pâturages, Et Petit Jardins: a Nineteenth-Century Gardien Homestead in the Petit Nord, Newfoundland

    Pêcheurs, Pâturages, Et Petit Jardins: a Nineteenth-Century Gardien Homestead in the Petit Nord, Newfoundland

    NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI* Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57435-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57435-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis.
  • Material Culture from the Wilson Farm Tenancy: Artifact Analysis

    Material Culture from the Wilson Farm Tenancy: Artifact Analysis

    AT THE ROAD’S EDGE: FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE WILSON FARM TENANCY SITE 7 Material Culture from the Wilson Farm Tenancy: Artifact Analysis LABORATORY AND ANALYTICAL METHODS The URS laboratory in Burlington, New Jersey, processed the artifacts recovered from Site 7NC- F-94. All artifacts were initially cleaned, labeled, and bagged (throughout, technicians maintained the excavation provenience integrity of each artifact). Stable artifacts were washed in water with Orvis soap using a soft bristle brush, then air-dried; in some cases, on an individual basis, artifacts deemed too delicate to wash were dry brushed—this is often the case with badly deteriorated iron and bone objects considered noteworthy. Technicians then labeled items such as prehistoric lithics, historic ceramics, bone, glass, and some metal artifacts. Labeling was conducted using an acid free, conservation grade, .25mm Staedtler marking pen applied over a base coat of Acyloid B72 resin; once the ink dried, the label was sealed with a second layer of Acyloid B72. The information marked on the artifacts consisted of the provenience catalog number. Once the artifacts were processed, they were then inventoried in a Microsoft Access database. The artifacts were sorted according to functional groups and material composition in this inventory. Separate analyses were conducted on the artifacts and inventory data to answer site spatial and temporal questions. Outside consultants analyzed the floral and faunal materials. URS conducted soil flotation. In order to examine the spatial distributions of artifacts in the plowzone, we entered the data for certain artifact types into the Surfer 8.06.39 contouring and surface-mapping program.
  • Ceramics Monthly Jun90 Cei069

    Ceramics Monthly Jun90 Cei069

    William C. Hunt........................................Editor Ruth C. Buder.......................... Associate Editor Robert L. Creager........................... Art Director Kim Schomburg....................Editorial Assistant Mary Rushley................... Circulation Manager Mary E. Beaver.................Circulation Assistant Jayne Lx>hr.......................Circulation Assistant Connie Belcher.................Advertising Manager Spencer L. Davis.................................Publisher Editorial, Advertising and Circulation Offices 1609 Northwest Boulevard Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio43212 (614) 488-8236 FAX (614) 488-4561 Ceramics Monthly (ISSN 0009-0328) is pub­ lished monthly except July and August by Professional Publications, Inc., 1609 North­ west Blvd., Columbus, Ohio 43212. Second Class postage paid at Columbus, Ohio. Subscription Rates: One year $20, two years $36, three years $50. Add $8 per year for subscriptions outside the U.S.A. Change of Address: Please give us four weeks advance notice. Send both the magazine address label and your new ad­ dress to: Ceramics Monthly, Circulation Of­ fices, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Contributors: Manuscripts, photographs, color separations, color transparencies (including 35mm slides), graphic illustra­ tions, announcements and news releases about ceramics are welcome and will be considered for publication. A booklet de­ scribing standards and procedures for the preparation and submission of a manu­ script is available upon request. Mail sub­ missions to: The Editor, Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Infor­ mation may also be sent by fax: (614) 488- 4561; or submitted on 3.5-inch microdisk- ettes readable with an Apple Macintosh™ computer system. Indexing: An index of each year’s articles appears in the December issue. Addition­ ally, articles in each issue ofCeramics Monthly are indexed in the Art Index; on-line (com­ puter) indexing is available through Wilson- line, 950 University Avenue, Bronx, New York 10452.
  • The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications

    The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications

    The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications By Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels: a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications by Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife with contributions from J.R.L. Allen, Nigel G. Cameron, Alan J. Clapham, Rowena Gale, and Mark Robinson with an introduction by Julie Gardiner Wessex Archaeology Internet Reports Published 2010 by Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, SP4 6EB http://www.wessexarch.co.uk/ Copyright © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2010 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Contents List of Figures List of Plates List of Tables Editor’s Introduction, by Julie Gardiner .......................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION The Severn Levels ............................................................................................................................ 5 The Wentlooge Formation ............................................................................................................... 5 The Avon Levels .............................................................................................................................. 6 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 7 THE INVESTIGATIONS The research/fieldwork: methods of investigation ..........................................................................
  • Antiques-February-1990-Victorian-Majolica.Pdf

    Antiques-February-1990-Victorian-Majolica.Pdf

    if It1ud!!&/ ';"(* ./J1!11L. /,0t£~ltldtiJlR~~~rf;t;t r{/'~dff;z, f!71/#/~i' 4 . !(Jf~f{ltiJ(/dwc.e. dJ /¥ C\-Cit!Ja? /Hc a4 ~- t1 . I. le/. {./ ,...."".. //,; J.(f)':J{"&Tf ,4.~'.£1//,/1;"~._L~ • ~. ~~f tn.~! .....•. ... PL IL Baseball and Soccer pitcher made by Griffen, Smith and Company, PllOeni;'Cville,Pennsylvania. c.1884. Impressed "GSH "in nlOnogram on the bottom. Height 8 inches. The Wedgwood pattern book illustration of the same design is shown in PL Ila. Karmason/Stacke collection; White photograph. PL /la. Design from one of the pattern books of Josiah Wedgwood and Sons, Barlaston, Stoke-on-Trent, England. Wedgwood Museum, Barlaston, Stoke-on-Trent, England. and Company, Josiah Wedgwood and Sons, and majolica.! New designs for majolica ceased to be made George Jones and Sons. From these books one be• in the early 1890's, and production of majolica ceased comes familiar with the style of the maker and comes early in this century. to appreciate the deliberate choice of details that gives The Minton shape books are valuable not only be• each piece its unity. cause they help date the first production of a piece but By 1836 Herbert Minton (1792- 1858) had succeed• also because they show the development of the eclectic ed his father, Thomas (1765-1836), the founder of the and revivalist styles used by Minton artists. The earli• prestigious Minton firm. In 1848 Joseph Leon Fran• est style used by the firm was inspired by Renaissance ~ois Arnoux (1816-1902) became Minton's art direc• majolica wares.Z Large cache pots, urns, and platters tor, chief chemist, and Herbert Minton's close col• were decorated with flower festoons, oak leaves, car• league.