DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 20 Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment – Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm Prepared by RPS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 20 Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment – Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm Prepared by RPS Environmental Impact Statement - VOLUME 3 Appendix 20 Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment – Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm Prepared by RPS PR100246 / R72894; Volume 3 Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS AUSTRALIA EAST PTY LTD TRANSFIELD SERVICES PTY LTD 135 Abbott Street Level 4, 52 Merivale Street PO Box 1949 South Brisbane QLD 4101 CAIRNS QLD 4870 T: +61 7 3248 8765 T: +61 4031 1336 F: +61 7 3248 8790 F: +61 4031 2942 W: www.transfieldservices.com E: [email protected] Report Number: PR100246/R69701 Version / Date: 1/August 2011 rpsgroup.com.au Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm IMPORTANT NOTE Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. All enquiries should be directed to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of Transfield Services Pty Ltd (“Client”) for the specific purpose of only for which it is supplied (“Purpose”). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate. Where an assumption has been made, we have not made any independent investigations with respect to the matters the subject of that assumption. We are not aware of any reason why any of the assumptions are incorrect. This report is presented without the assumption of a duty of care to any other person (other than the Client) (“Third Party”). The report may not contain sufficient information for the purposes of a Third Party or for other uses. Without the prior written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd: (a) this report may not be relied on by a Third Party; and (b) RPS Australia East Pty Ltd will not be liable to a Third Party for any loss, damage, liability or claim arising out of or incidental to a Third Party publishing, using or relying on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report. If a Third Party uses or relies on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report with or without the consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd, RPS Australia East Pty Ltd disclaims all risk and the Third Party assumes all risk and releases and indemnifies and agrees to keep indemnified RPS Australia East Pty Ltd from any loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this report. In this note, a reference to loss and damage includes past and prospective economic loss, loss of profits, damage to property, injury to any person (including death) costs and expenses incurred in taking measures to prevent, mitigate or rectify any harm, loss of opportunity, legal costs, compensation, interest and any other direct, indirect, consequential or financial or other loss. Document Status RPS QA Issue Version Purpose of Document Orig Review Review Date Release Review Date Approval 1 Prelim Assessment SG & JM DF 09/08/11 09/08/11 09/08/11 09/08/11 PR100246/R69701; 1/August 2011 Page ii Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Site Description 8 PART 1 – FAUNA ASSESSMENT 10 2.0 SOURCES OF INFORMATION – FAUNA ASSESSMENT 11 2.1 Existing Information 11 3.0 FIELD METHODOLOGY 12 3.1 Survey Timing 12 3.2 Survey Methodology 12 3.2.1 Pitfall Trapping (May 2010 only) 14 3.2.2 Elliott Trapping (May 2010 only) 14 3.2.3 Funnel Trapping (May 2010 only) 14 3.2.4 Harp Trapping (May 2010 only) 14 3.2.5 Microchiropteran Bat Call Detection (May 2010, March-April 2011, June-July 2011) 14 3.2.6 Diurnal Bird Surveys (May 2010 & March-April 2011) 15 3.2.7 Spotlighting (May 2010 & March-April 2011) 15 3.2.8 Owl Call Playback (March-April 2011) 16 3.2.9 Active Searches 16 3.2.10 Raptor Searches (March-April 2011) 16 3.2.11 Opportunistic Observations 16 3.2.12 Camera Trapping (Targeted Northern Quoll Survey) 17 4.0 RESULTS 18 4.1 Habitat Assessment 18 4.2 Fauna Species Occurrence 18 4.2.1 Mammals 20 4.2.2 Birds 23 4.2.3 Reptiles 23 4.2.4 Amphibians 23 4.3 Potential Faunal Movement through the Landscape 24 5.0 POTENTIAL FAUNAL IMPACTS 25 5.1 Turbine Collisions and Barotrauma 25 5.1.1 Bird & Bat Collisions 25 5.1.2 Barotrauma 26 5.2 Habitat Alienation due to Turbine Avoidance 27 5.3 Habitat Modification 28 PR100246/R69701; 1/August 2011 Page iii Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm 5.4 Increased Predation Risk Adjacent to Access Tracks 29 5.5 Potential Impacts on the Endangered Northern Quoll 29 6.0 POTENTIAL MITIGATION OPTIONS AND FURTHER WORK 31 6.1 Rotor Strike/Barotrauma 31 6.2 Habitat Modification 31 6.3 Increased Predation Pressure 33 7.0 CONCLUSION 34 PART 2 – VEGETATION & FLORA ASSESSMENT 38 8.0 METHODS – VEGETATION & FLORA ASSESSMENT 39 8.1 Desktop Review 39 8.1.1 Flora and Vegetation Survey Methods 40 9.0 RESULTS OF DESKTOP REVIEW - VEGETATION 41 9.1 Regional Ecosystem Mapping 41 9.1.1 Amendment to Regional Ecosystem Mapping 43 9.2 Essential Habitat 44 9.3 Wildlife Online Database Search - Flora 45 9.4 Protected Matters Database Search - Flora 46 9.5 HERBRECS – Queensland Herbarium Records 47 9.6 Regional Vegetation Management Codes 48 9.7 Watercourses 48 9.8 Wetlands 49 10.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION – VEGETATION & FLORA 50 10.1 Flora and Vegetation Assessment 50 10.1.1 Vegetation Overview and Condition 50 10.1.2 Effects of Fire 52 10.1.3 Flowering and Fruiting Phenology 52 10.1.4 Regional Ecosystem Mapping Amendment 53 10.2 Description of Vegetation Survey Sites 54 10.2.1 Vegetation Survey Site 1 (Land surrounding Granite Creek) 55 10.2.2 Vegetation Survey Site 2 56 10.2.3 Vegetation Survey Site 3 56 10.2.4 Vegetation Survey Site 4 57 10.2.5 Vegetation Survey Site 5 57 10.2.6 Vegetation Survey Site 6 58 10.2.7 Vegetation Survey Site 7 58 10.2.8 Vegetation Survey Site 8 58 10.2.9 Vegetation Survey Site 9 59 10.2.10 Vegetation Survey Site 10 59 PR100246/R69701; 1/August 2011 Page iv Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm 10.2.11 Vegetation Survey Site 11 60 10.2.12 Vegetation Survey Site 12 60 10.2.13 Vegetation Survey Site 13 61 10.2.14 Vegetation Survey Site 14 61 10.2.15 Vegetation Survey Site 15 61 10.2.16 Vegetation Survey Site 16 62 10.2.17 Vegetation Survey Site 17 62 10.2.18 Vegetation Survey Site 18 63 10.2.19 Vegetation Survey Site 19 63 10.2.20 Vegetation Survey Site 20 64 10.2.21 Vegetation Survey Site 21 64 10.2.22 Vegetation Survey Site 22 65 10.2.23 Vegetation Survey Site 23 66 10.2.24 Vegetation Survey Site 24 66 10.2.25 Vegetation Survey Site 25 67 10.2.26 Vegetation Survey Site 26 67 10.3 Important Vegetation Communities and Habitats 68 10.3.1 Summary of Habitat Types 69 10.3.2 Significant Flora 70 11.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO VEGETATION AND FLORA 72 11.1 Vegetation & Flora Impacts 72 12.0 IMPACT MITIGATION – VEGETATION & FLORA 75 12.1 Vegetation Clearing 75 12.2 Weed Management 75 12.3 Vegetation Mapping 76 12.4 Vegetation Connectivity 77 12.5 Vegetation Integrity 77 12.6 Rare and Threatened Plants 77 12.7 Landscape Rehabilitation 77 12.8 Fire Management 78 13.0 CONCLUSION – VEGETATION & FLORA 79 14.0 REFERENCES & BIBLIOGRAPHY 81 PR100246/R69701; 1/August 2011 Page v Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm Tables Fauna Assessment Table 1 List of fauna species of conservation significance recorded or predicted to occur on the site 19 Vegetation & Flora Assessment Table 1 Description of regional ecosystems mapped in the project area 43 Table 2 Descriptions of RE 7.12.30 and 7.12.65 from the Regional Ecosystem Description Database 44 Table 3 Plant species shown to have essential habitat in the study area. 45 Table 4 Regional ecosystems corresponding with essential habitat 46 Table 5 Conservation significant flora as listed in the Wildlife Online database 46 Table 6 Conservation significant flora as listed in the EPBC Act’s Protected Matters database 47 Table 7 Summary of HERBRECS data for conservation significant flora 48 Figures Figure 1 Site Location 9 Figure 2 Fauna Survey Site Locations 13 Figure 3 Targeted Northern Quoll Camera Trap Survey 21 Plates Fauna Assessment Plate 1 One of the many Northern Quolls 22 Vegetation & Flora Assessment Plate 1 Grevillea glossadenia. 72 Plate 2 Homoranthus porteri 72 Appendices FAUNA ASSESSMENT Appendix A1: LOCATION OF FAUNA SURVEY SITES AND SURVEY METHODOLOGY USED Appendix B1: LIST OF FAUNA SPECIES RECORDED OR PREDICTED TO OCCUR ON THE SITE Appendix C1: QLD WILDLIFE ONLINE SEARCH RESULTS (FAUNA ONLY) Appendix D1: EPBC PROTECTED MATTERS SEARCH TOOL RESULTS Appendix E1: MICROCHIROPTERAN BAT ANALYSIS REPORTS VEGETION & FLORA ASSESSMENT Appendix A2: VEGETATION SURVEY SITES Appendix B2: CURRENT REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM MAPPING Appendix C2: REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS Appendix D2: AMENDED REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM MAPPING Appendix E2: DERM WILDLIFE ONLINE DATABASE SEARCH Appendix F2: HERBRECS - LOCATION OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANT FLORA Appendix G2: ADDRESS TO REGIONAL VEGETATION MANAGEMENT CODES Appendix H2: WATERCOURSES (DERM) Appendix I2: PROVISIONAL CHECKLIST OF FLORA Appendix J2: VEGETATION STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS – VEGETATION SURVEY SITES PR100246/R69701; 1/August 2011 Page vi Fauna, Vegetation & Flora Assessment - Proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Mt Emerald wind farm at completion is proposed to include up to 75 turbines on land described as Lot 7 on Plan SP235244 located approximately 5 km west of the township of Walkamin at the northernmost extension of the Herberton Range, which forms part of the Great Dividing Range.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay)
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines Final report August 2015 Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 978-1-76010-260-9 Secretariat Ms Jeanette Radcliffe (Committee Secretary) Ms Jackie Morris (Acting Secretary) Dr Richard Grant (Principal Research Officer) Ms Kate Gauthier (Principal Research Officer) Ms Trish Carling (Senior Research Officer) Mr Tasman Larnach (Senior Research Officer) Dr Joshua Forkert (Senior Research Officer) Ms Carol Stewart (Administrative Officer) Ms Kimberley Balaga (Administrative Officer) Ms Sarah Batts (Administrative Officer) PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3241 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/select_windturbines This document was produced by the Senate Select Wind Turbines Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ ii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE 44th Parliament Members Senator John Madigan, Chair Victoria, IND Senator Bob Day AO, Deputy Chair South Australia, FFP Senator Chris Back Western Australia, LP Senator Matthew Canavan Queensland, NATS Senator David Leyonhjelm New South Wales, LDP Senator Anne Urquhart Tasmania, ALP Substitute members Senator Gavin Marshall Victoria, ALP for Senator Anne Urquhart (from 18 May to 18 May 2015) Participating members for this inquiry Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND Senator the Hon Doug Cameron New South Wales, ALP iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of the Committee ........................................................................ iii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Tilt Renewables Target Company Statement
    26 September 2018 The Tilt Renewables Independent Adviser Report is overly optimistic and not supported by market benchmarks On 17 September 2018, Tilt Renewables Limited ("Tilt Renewables") released its Target Company Statement and Independent Adviser Report. These documents included a valuation range for Tilt Renewables shares of between NZ$2.56 and NZ$3.01 per share. Infratil believes there are a number of areas where the independent adviser's assumptions are significantly more favourable than market comparatives. As such, Infratil has commissioned an independent report from Grant Thornton Corporate Finance Pty Ltd ("Grant Thornton") to review the assumptions underlying the Northington Partners ("Northington") valuation. Grant Thornton has extensive experience in preparing independent expert reports with strong credentials in valuing renewable energy businesses. Grant Thornton has concluded that a number of assumptions adopted by Northington are overly optimistic and do not fully allow for the risks of the Tilt Renewables operating portfolio, leading to a valuation range that is higher than fair market value. The assumptions that Grant Thornton considered overly optimistic include: • The market required rate of return, or weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"), assumed by Northington for Tilt Renewables’ operating wind farms is too low. The current uncertainty in the Australian political environment and energy market is not adequately reflected in the Northington assessment of WACC, nor is the future exposure to merchant energy prices that Tilt Renewables faces following the expiry of its existing revenue contracts (revenue contracts in respect of approximately 10% of annual output are expected to expire from December 2018). Northington’s assumption is also materially lower than the WACC Tilt Renewables itself used to test the fair value of its operating wind farms for impairment in its 2018 annual report and the WACCs used by all independent research analysts who publish analysis on Tilt Renewables.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Across Queensland's Regions
    Renewable Energy across Queensland’s Regions July 2018 Enlightening environmental markets Green Energy Markets Pty Ltd ABN 92 127 062 864 2 Domville Avenue Hawthorn VIC 3122 Australia T +61 3 9805 0777 F +61 3 9815 1066 [email protected] greenmarkets.com.au Part of the Green Energy Group Green Energy Markets 1 Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................6 2 Overview of Renewable Energy across Queensland .....................................................8 2.1 Large-scale projects ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Rooftop solar photovoltaics ........................................................................................................ 13 2.3 Batteries-Energy Storage ........................................................................................................... 16 2.4 The renewable energy resource ................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Transmission .............................................................................................................................. 26 3 The renewable energy supply chain ............................................................................. 31 3.1 Construction activity .................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Equipment manufacture
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION on the TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and Plants
    BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ON THE TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and plants Report prepared by John Woinarski, Kym Brennan, Ian Cowie, Raelee Kerrigan and Craig Hempel. Darwin, August 2003 Cover photo: Tall forests dominated by Darwin stringybark Eucalyptus tetrodonta, Darwin woollybutt E. miniata and Melville Island Bloodwood Corymbia nesophila are the principal landscape element across the Tiwi islands (photo: Craig Hempel). i SUMMARY The Tiwi Islands comprise two of Australia’s largest offshore islands - Bathurst (with an area of 1693 km 2) and Melville (5788 km 2) Islands. These are Aboriginal lands lying about 20 km to the north of Darwin, Northern Territory. The islands are of generally low relief with relatively simple geological patterning. They have the highest rainfall in the Northern Territory (to about 2000 mm annual average rainfall in the far north-west of Melville and north of Bathurst). The human population of about 2000 people lives mainly in the three towns of Nguiu, Milakapati and Pirlangimpi. Tall forests dominated by Eucalyptus miniata, E. tetrodonta, and Corymbia nesophila cover about 75% of the island area. These include the best developed eucalypt forests in the Northern Territory. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 1300 rainforest patches, with floristic composition in many of these patches distinct from that of the Northern Territory mainland. Although the total extent of rainforest on the Tiwi Islands is small (around 160 km 2 ), at an NT level this makes up an unusually high proportion of the landscape and comprises between 6 and 15% of the total NT rainforest extent. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 200 km 2 of “treeless plains”, a vegetation type largely restricted to these islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Impact Assessment
    Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Impact Assessment RATCH-AUSTRALIA CORPORATION Final 30 October 2014 Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Baseline Project no: QE06742.001 Document title: Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment Document no: R02 Revision: Final R2 Date: 30 October 2014 Client name: RATCH-AUSTRALIA Corporation Project manager: Annete Armstrong Author: David Cotterill, Paul Nidras, Ngcebo Gwebu File name: I:\QENV2\Projects\QE06742\Deliverables\Revised Report for submission 30 October 2014\MEWF Economic Impact Assessment Final_R2 with tracks.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Brisbane (Cordelia St) PO Box 3848 South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia T +61 8 8424 3800 F +61 8 8424 3810 www.jacobs.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved Draft Rev 1 17/09/2014 Technical Review Darron Cook 18/09/2014 DCook Draft Rev 1 18/09/2014 Project Manager Review Annete 18/09/2014 AArmstrong Armstrong Draft Rev1 19/09/2014 Project Director Review Hunter 19/09/2014 HBrownscombe Brownscombe Final 15/10/14 Technical Review Sophie Rolls 15/10/2014 SRolls Final 16/10/14 Project Manager Review Annete 16/10/2014 AArmstrong Armstrong Revised 28/10/14 Technical Review David Cotterill 28/10/2014 DCotterill Revised 29/10/14 Project Manager Review Annete 29/10/2014 AArmstrong Armstrong Final R2 30/10/2014 Technical Review David Cotterill 30/10/2014 DCotterill i Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Financing 2016 Year in Review
    2016 YEAR IN REVIEW Capital Financing This document was published on 15 December 2016. Steve Lambert, EGM Capital Financing A LOOK BACK OVER THE YEAR 2016 saw the theme of volatility and innovation continue, the importance of Asian investors and the growing power of self-managed superannuation for non-institutional investors in the domestic bond market. Last year in our Year in Review 2015 overview I spoke a capital account surplus. The importance of Asian about two common themes being innovation and investors in funding Australia has been consistent since volatility. Volatility saw markets closed at various times the Global Financial Crisis, be it through loans and/or due to many factors, often global in nature. In respect bonds. The importance of the offshore market cannot to innovation there was a strong move in how people be underestimated. Every year the percentage of the needed to find solutions to overcome this volatility and domestic market that is purchased from Asian investors other challenges. grows and the number and the variety of the investors from Asia are becoming more diverse both geographically In some respect those two themes continued in 2016. The and from the type of institution. We are also seeing more first few months of 2016 saw the low point of commodity activity from the Asian offices of a number of European or prices and a lot of uncertainty over global growth US fund managers. I don’t see this changing in 2017. generally and Chinese growth specifically. The market rebounded in March and we broadly saw a more friendly The other big theme is the power of self-managed issuing environment through the remainder of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Energy Dynamics Q3 2018
    Quarterly Energy Dynamics Q3 2018 Author: Market Insights | Markets Important notice PURPOSE AEMO has prepared this report to provide energy market participants and governments with information on the market dynamics, trends and outcomes during Q3 2018 (1 July to 30 September 2018). This quarterly report compares results for the quarter against other recent quarters, focussing on Q2 2018 and Q3 2017. Geographically, the report covers: • The National Electricity Market – which includes Queensland, New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. • The Wholesale Electricity Market operating in Western Australia. • The gas markets operating in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. DISCLAIMER This document or the information in it may be subsequently updated or amended. This document does not constitute legal or business advice, and should not be relied on as a substitute for obtaining detailed advice about the National Electricity Law, the National Electricity Rules, the Wholesale Electricity Market Rules, the National Gas Law, the National Gas Rules, the Gas Services Information Regulations or any other applicable laws, procedures or policies. AEMO has made every effort to ensure the quality of the information in this document but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by law, AEMO and its officers, employees and consultants involved in the preparation of this document: • make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this document; and • are not liable (whether by reason of negligence or otherwise) for any statements or representations in this document, or any omissions from it, or for any use or reliance on the information in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest News Kelsey Creek Solar Farm in the Local Newspaper Whitsunday Guardian
    KCSF l(l:l..81:Y CAEIE.K tlCl..A.A J'"A.RM ~ Image Refere nce: BayWa r.e. Solar Projects GmbH; Sola r Farm Project Example, SOMW ..!:... ..... """"' .. """' ...... ~ ~ Click here to read the full article (http://www.whitsundaycoastguardian comau/news/prossie-powers-up-solar-farm-is-a-win-win-project/3027583/) Latest News Kelsey Creek Solar Farm in the local newspaper Whitsunday Guardian: WELCOME TO KELSEY CREEK SOLAR FARM Kelsey Creek Solar Farm is a project initiated by local land owners and busin esses fr om wit hin the l oca l comm unity . The project Consortium (KCSFC) envisages to bring a large-scale renewable energy generator io the Whitsunday region . Kelsey Creek Solar Farm - up io dare the largest solar farm in Queensland and the third largest in Australia. Community support and local sourcing are the cornerstones for Kelsey Creek Solar Farm. Benefn s created for the Whitsunday region will be employment opportunities, local investment, and nationwide promotion as a sustainable region supplied by renewable energy Major project development tasks are undertaken by specialist companies from within the Whitsunday region. The plant design and Engineering know-how is provided by an Australian engineering consultancy specialising in solar photovoltaic systems. Global best-practice in Construction & Operat ion will come from international project partners who have a wealth of experience in the deployment of large-scale solar PV around the world. Copyri ght © Kelsey Creek Solar Farm 2016 I All Rights Reserveo Website designed by Lightbox
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Australia 2020
    CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA REPORT 2020 AUSTRALIA CLEAN ENERGY REPORT 2020 CONTENTS 4 Introduction 6 2019 snapshot 12 Jobs and investment in renewable energy by state 15 Project tracker 16 Renewable Energy Target a reminder of what good policy looks like 18 Industry outlook: small-scale renewable energy 22 Industry outlook: large-scale renewable energy 24 State policies 26 Australian Capital Territory 28 New South Wales 30 Northern Territory 32 Queensland 34 South Australia 36 Tasmania 38 Victoria 40 Western Australia 42 Employment 44 Renewables for business 48 International update 50 Electricity prices 52 Transmission 54 Energy reliability 56 Technology profiles 58 Battery storage 60 Hydro and pumped hydro 62 Hydrogen 64 Solar: Household and commercial systems up to 100 kW 72 Solar: Medium-scale systems between 100 kW and 5 MW 74 Solar: Large-scale systems larger than 5 MW 78 Wind Cover image: Lake Bonney Battery Energy Storage System, South Australia INTRODUCTION Kane Thornton Chief Executive, Clean Energy Council Whether it was the More than 2.2 GW of new large-scale Despite the industry’s record-breaking achievement of the renewable generation capacity was year, the electricity grid and the lack of Renewable Energy Target, added to the grid in 2019 across 34 a long-term energy policy continue to projects, representing $4.3 billion in be a barrier to further growth for large- a record year for the investment and creating more than scale renewable energy investment. construction of wind and 4000 new jobs. Almost two-thirds of Grid congestion, erratic transmission solar or the emergence this new generation came from loss factors and system strength issues of the hydrogen industry, large-scale solar, while the wind sector caused considerable headaches for by any measure 2019 was had its best ever year in 2019 as 837 project developers in 2019 as the MW of new capacity was installed grid struggled to keep pace with the a remarkable year for transition to renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • RATCH-Australia Corporation Pty Ltd Level 7/111 Pacific Highway North Sydney NSW 2060
    RATCH-Australia Corporation Pty Ltd Level 7/111 Pacific Highway North Sydney NSW 2060 www.ratchaustralia.com Ms Merryn York 19 October 2020 Acting Chair Australian Energy Market Commission Lodged online: www.aemc.gov.au Dear Ms York, Co-ordination of generation and transmission investment implementation On behalf of RATCH-Australia Corporation, I would like to submit the following brief response to the AEMC’s interim report on its proposal for transmission access reform, which I hope you are able to consider. Background RATCH-Australia Corporation is an independent power producer with a portfolio of generation assets in Australia with a capacity of more than 1.2GW. This portfolio includes: 180.5MW Mount Emerald Wind Farm in Far North Queensland, commissioned in 2018 226.8MW Collector Wind Farm currently under construction in NSW 42.5MW Collinsville Solar Farm, commissioned in 2019 214.2MW Yandin Wind Farm (RATCH-Australia acquired a 70% interest in 2019). Construction, managed by Alinta Energy, due to complete in 2020 33MW Starfish Hill Wind Farm 21MW Toora Wind Farm 12MW Windy Hill Wind Farm 119MW Kwinana Power Station 310MW Kemerton Power Station 242MW Townsville Power Station RATCH-Australia has been developing, building and operating renewable energy projects since 2011. The company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the RATCH Group, which is listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand and has a market capitalisation equivalent to approximately $4bn. Response RATCH-Australia endorses the content of the submission provided by the Clean Energy Council, of which the company is a sponsoring member, which we note was developed following extensive engagement with, and input from, industry participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Survey of Batavia Downs, Cape York Peninsula
    QR91003 Vegetation survey of Batavia Downs Cape York Peninsula V. J. Neldner, J. R. Clarkson Botany Branch Department of Primary Industries & Brisbane Queensland Government Technical Report This report is a scanned copy and some detail may be illegible or lost. Before acting on any information, readers are strongly advised to ensure that numerals, percentages and details are correct. This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1991 For information about this report contact [email protected] Research Establishments Publication QR91003 Vegetation survey of Batavia Downs Cape York Peninsula V. J. Neldner, J. R. Clarkson Botany Branch Department of Primary Industries Brisbane ISSN 0813-4391 Agdex 301/06 This publication was prepared for officers of the Department of Primary Industries. It may be distributed to other interested individuals and organisations. © Queensland Government 1991 Department of Primary Industries, Queensland GPO Box 46 Brisbane Qld4001 Ill Contents List of figures Page iv List of tables iv List of plates iv Summary v 1.
    [Show full text]