DOCSLIB.ORG

Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Impact Assessment Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Impact Assessment RATCH-AUSTRALIA CORPORATION Final 30 October 2014 Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment Mount Emerald Wind Farm Economic Baseline Project no: QE06742.001 Document title: Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment Document no: R02 Revision: Final R2 Date: 30 October 2014 Client name: RATCH-AUSTRALIA Corporation Project manager: Annete Armstrong Author: David Cotterill, Paul Nidras, Ngcebo Gwebu File name: I:\QENV2\Projects\QE06742\Deliverables\Revised Report for submission 30 October 2014\MEWF Economic Impact Assessment Final_R2 with tracks.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Brisbane (Cordelia St) PO Box 3848 South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia T +61 8 8424 3800 F +61 8 8424 3810 www.jacobs.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved Draft Rev 1 17/09/2014 Technical Review Darron Cook 18/09/2014 DCook Draft Rev 1 18/09/2014 Project Manager Review Annete 18/09/2014 AArmstrong Armstrong Draft Rev1 19/09/2014 Project Director Review Hunter 19/09/2014 HBrownscombe Brownscombe Final 15/10/14 Technical Review Sophie Rolls 15/10/2014 SRolls Final 16/10/14 Project Manager Review Annete 16/10/2014 AArmstrong Armstrong Revised 28/10/14 Technical Review David Cotterill 28/10/2014 DCotterill Revised 29/10/14 Project Manager Review Annete 29/10/2014 AArmstrong Armstrong Final R2 30/10/2014 Technical Review David Cotterill 30/10/2014 DCotterill i Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Purpose of the report ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Report structure ............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Policy/strategy context ............................................................................................................................. 7 3. Socio-economic baseline ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Study area ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Regional context and land use pattern ......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Population and demography ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Population ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Family and household composition............................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.3 Housing ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.4 Socio-economic indices for areas (SEIFA) ................................................................................................................................... 14 3.3.5 Personal income ........................................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4 Workforce participation and employment...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Labour force and employment ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.2 Industries of employment .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 3.5 Local business and industry.......................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.6 Social infrastructure ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 4. Economic Impact Assessment .............................................................................................................. 24 4.1 Overview of IO modelling .............................................................................................................................................................. 24 4.1.1 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.2 Application of the IO model ........................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.3 Modelling assumptions ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Project expenditure ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.3 Economic impacts ......................................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.3.1 Output impact ............................................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.3.2 Value added impact ...................................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.3.3 Household income impact............................................................................................................................................................. 31 4.3.4 Project employment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.5 Distribution of impacts................................................................................................................................................................... 32 5. Agricultural impacts ................................................................................................................................ 36 5.1 Pest management from local ecosystem related services ............................................................................................................ 36 5.1.1 Method .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.1.2 Analysis......................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Agricultural impacts....................................................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.1 Method of assessment .................................................................................................................................................................. 39 5.2.2 Potential impacts associated with terminating aerial spraying ...................................................................................................... 39 5.2.3 Potential impacts of terminating all farm operations ..................................................................................................................... 40 6. Business and social impacts ................................................................................................................. 42 6.1.1 Social infrastructure ...................................................................................................................................................................... 43 ii Mount Emerald Wind Farm - Economic Impact Assessment 6.1.2 Local amenity ................................................................................................................................................................................ 43 6.1.3 Businesses ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROAM Consulting Report on Security of Supply and Tranmission Impacts Of
    ROAM Consulting Pty Ltd A.B.N. 54 091 533 621 Report (EMC00017) to Impact of the LRET on the costs of FCAS, NCAS and Transmission augmentation 13 September 2011 Report to: Impact of the LRET on the costs of FCAS, NCAS and Transmission augmentation EMC00017 13 September 2011 VERSION HISTORY Version History Revision Date Issued Prepared By Approved By Revision Type Jenny Riesz Joel Gilmore Sam Shiao 0.9 2011-07-04 Ian Rose Preliminary Draft David Yeowart Richard Bean Matthew Holmes Jenny Riesz 1 2011-07-07 Ian Rose Complete Matthew Holmes 1.1 2011-07-07 Jenny Riesz Ian Rose Minor text edits Minor text edits - Appendix B 1.2 2011-09-01 Jenny Riesz - and explanation of Badgingarra Minor text edits – further 1.3 2011-09-13 Jenny Riesz - explanation of Badgingarra ROAM Consulting Pty Ltd VERSION HISTORY www.roamconsulting.com.au Report to: Impact of the LRET on the costs of FCAS, NCAS and Transmission augmentation EMC00017 13 September 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of the Ministerial Council on Energy, the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) is conducting an assessment of the impact of the Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) on security of energy supply, the price of electricity and emissions levels from the energy sector. The AEMC appointed consultants to develop a long-term generation expansion plan for meeting the LRET. Consequently, the ‘core’ scenarios for the portfolio and geographic distribution of technologies have been determined. ROAM Consulting was subsequently appointed to utilise these scenarios to forecast the cost of Frequency Control Ancillary Services (FCAS), Network Support and Control Ancillary Services (NSCAS) and transmission augmentation associated with the LRET for the National Electricity Market (NEM) and the South West Interconnected System (SWIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines Final report August 2015 Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 978-1-76010-260-9 Secretariat Ms Jeanette Radcliffe (Committee Secretary) Ms Jackie Morris (Acting Secretary) Dr Richard Grant (Principal Research Officer) Ms Kate Gauthier (Principal Research Officer) Ms Trish Carling (Senior Research Officer) Mr Tasman Larnach (Senior Research Officer) Dr Joshua Forkert (Senior Research Officer) Ms Carol Stewart (Administrative Officer) Ms Kimberley Balaga (Administrative Officer) Ms Sarah Batts (Administrative Officer) PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3241 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/select_windturbines This document was produced by the Senate Select Wind Turbines Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ ii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE 44th Parliament Members Senator John Madigan, Chair Victoria, IND Senator Bob Day AO, Deputy Chair South Australia, FFP Senator Chris Back Western Australia, LP Senator Matthew Canavan Queensland, NATS Senator David Leyonhjelm New South Wales, LDP Senator Anne Urquhart Tasmania, ALP Substitute members Senator Gavin Marshall Victoria, ALP for Senator Anne Urquhart (from 18 May to 18 May 2015) Participating members for this inquiry Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND Senator the Hon Doug Cameron New South Wales, ALP iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of the Committee ........................................................................ iii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Tilt Renewables Target Company Statement
    26 September 2018 The Tilt Renewables Independent Adviser Report is overly optimistic and not supported by market benchmarks On 17 September 2018, Tilt Renewables Limited ("Tilt Renewables") released its Target Company Statement and Independent Adviser Report. These documents included a valuation range for Tilt Renewables shares of between NZ$2.56 and NZ$3.01 per share. Infratil believes there are a number of areas where the independent adviser's assumptions are significantly more favourable than market comparatives. As such, Infratil has commissioned an independent report from Grant Thornton Corporate Finance Pty Ltd ("Grant Thornton") to review the assumptions underlying the Northington Partners ("Northington") valuation. Grant Thornton has extensive experience in preparing independent expert reports with strong credentials in valuing renewable energy businesses. Grant Thornton has concluded that a number of assumptions adopted by Northington are overly optimistic and do not fully allow for the risks of the Tilt Renewables operating portfolio, leading to a valuation range that is higher than fair market value. The assumptions that Grant Thornton considered overly optimistic include: • The market required rate of return, or weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"), assumed by Northington for Tilt Renewables’ operating wind farms is too low. The current uncertainty in the Australian political environment and energy market is not adequately reflected in the Northington assessment of WACC, nor is the future exposure to merchant energy prices that Tilt Renewables faces following the expiry of its existing revenue contracts (revenue contracts in respect of approximately 10% of annual output are expected to expire from December 2018). Northington’s assumption is also materially lower than the WACC Tilt Renewables itself used to test the fair value of its operating wind farms for impairment in its 2018 annual report and the WACCs used by all independent research analysts who publish analysis on Tilt Renewables.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Across Queensland's Regions
    Renewable Energy across Queensland’s Regions July 2018 Enlightening environmental markets Green Energy Markets Pty Ltd ABN 92 127 062 864 2 Domville Avenue Hawthorn VIC 3122 Australia T +61 3 9805 0777 F +61 3 9815 1066 [email protected] greenmarkets.com.au Part of the Green Energy Group Green Energy Markets 1 Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................6 2 Overview of Renewable Energy across Queensland .....................................................8 2.1 Large-scale projects ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Rooftop solar photovoltaics ........................................................................................................ 13 2.3 Batteries-Energy Storage ........................................................................................................... 16 2.4 The renewable energy resource ................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Transmission .............................................................................................................................. 26 3 The renewable energy supply chain ............................................................................. 31 3.1 Construction activity .................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Equipment manufacture
    [Show full text]
  • Water Pluto Project Port Study
    WESTERN AUSTRALIA’S INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT MAGAZINE March–May 2007 $3 (inc GST) Print post approved PP 665002/00062 approved Print post WATER The potential impact of climate change and lower rainfall on the resources sector PLUTO PROJECT Site works begin on the first new LNG project in WA for 25 years PORT STUDY Ronsard Island recommended as the site for a new Pilbara iron ore port DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY AND RESOURCES Investment Services 1 Adelaide Terrace East Perth • Western Australia 6004 Tel: +61 8 9222 3333 • Fax: +61 8 9222 3862 Email: [email protected] www.doir.wa.gov.au INTERNATIONAL OFFICES Europe European Office • 5th floor, Australia Centre Corner of Strand and Melbourne Place London WC2B 4LG • UNITED KINGDOM Tel: +44 20 7240 2881 • Fax: +44 20 7240 6637 Email: [email protected] India — Mumbai Western Australian Trade Office 93 Jolly Maker Chambers No 2 9th floor, Nariman Point • Mumbai 400 021 • INDIA Tel: +91 22 6630 3973 • Fax: +91 22 6630 3977 Email: [email protected] India — Chennai Western Australian Trade Office - Advisory Office 1 Doshi Regency • 876 Poonamallee High Road From the Director General Kilpauk • Chennai 600 084 • INDIA Tel: +91 44 2640 0407 • Fax: +91 44 2643 0064 Email: [email protected] Indonesia — Jakarta Western Australia Trade Office A climate for opportunities and change JI H R Rasuna Said Kav - Kuningan Jakarta 12940 • INDONESIA Tel: +62 21 5290 2860 • Fax: +62 21 5296 2722 Many experts and analysts are forecasting that 2007 will bring exciting new Email: [email protected] opportunities and developments in the resources industry in Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy and the National Electricity Market with Particular Reference to South Australia
    © Australian Greenhouse Office Wind Energy and the National Electricity Market with particular reference to South Australia A report for the Australian Greenhouse Office Prepared by Hugh Outhred Version 8 March 2003 Contact details for Hugh Outhred Tel: 0414 385 240; Fax: 02 9385 5993; Email: [email protected] Wind Energy and the National Electricity Market Summary Wind energy appears likely to be the first stochastic resource to be widely used for generating electricity. For that reason alone, wind energy brings new issues that should be addressed prior to its extensive deployment. However, the exploitation of wind energy also brings innovative use of generator technologies, including widespread use of induction generators and power electronic interfaces, which may have implications for electricity industry operation. The key issues that arise are: ß Uncertainty in the future power output and energy production of wind turbines, wind farms and groups of wind farms, arising from effects such as topographic features, short- term turbulence, diurnal, weather and seasonal patterns, and long-term phenomena such as climate change. ß Voltage and frequency disturbances due to starting transients, power fluctuations during operation and stopping transients initiated by high wind speeds or network disturbances. ß Potential problems in fault detection and/or fault clearance caused by either inadequate or excessive fault level in the vicinity of a wind farm. ß Potential difficulties in managing frequency and/or voltage in power systems with a high penetration of wind turbines due to low inertia and/or lack of voltage control capability. ß Difficulties in capturing economies of scale in network connection for wind farms, because the network rating that minimises per-unit network connection cost may exceed the effective network rating required by a single wind farm (which will usually be less than the nameplate rating of the wind farm due to diversity effects).
    [Show full text]
  • Urbis Report
    Warradarge Wind Farm Planning Compliance Report May 2012 URBIS STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS REPORT WERE: Director Ray Haeren Senior Consultant Kris Nolan Consultant Megan Gammon Job Code PA0794 Report Number Planning Compliance Report_May2012 © Urbis Pty Ltd ABN 50 105 256 228 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. While we have tried to ensure the accuracy of the information in this publication, the Publisher accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions or resultant consequences including any loss or damage arising from reliance in information in this publication. URBIS Australia Asia Middle East urbis.com.au 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 2 Understanding of the Warradarge Wind Farm Proposal ........................................................... 5 3 Site Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Significant Features ............................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Sites of Cultural Significance............................................................................................... 7 3.3 Key Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Contours ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Demand Forecasts
    2014 Electricity Statement of Opportunities (ESOO) Stakeholder Workshop Neetika Kapani A/Manager, System Capacity 1 July 2015 1 Agenda Background Purpose Key Findings o Peak Demand Forecasts o Energy Forecasts Interesting Analysis o Capacity Credits by Market Participant o Individual Reserve Capacity Requirement (IRCR) o Solar PV o Battery Questions 2 2014 and 2015 ESOO deferrals Minister for Energy directed IMO on 29 April 2014 to defer certain aspects of the 2014 Reserve Capacity Cycle, by a year. 13 March 2015 to defer certain aspects of the 2015 Reserve Capacity Cycle, by a year. On 17 June 2015, the IMO published 2014 ESOO and sets the Reserve Capacity Target for the 2016-17 Capacity Year Reserve Capacity Information Pack 3 RCM Process http://www.imowa.com.au/home/electricity/reserve-capacity 4 Purpose of the 2014 ESOO Provides market data and information of interest to current and potential WEM participants and stakeholders Sets the Reserve Capacity Target (RCT) for the 2016-17 Capacity Year o RCT for 2016-17 is 4,557 MW o Based on the 10 per cent probability of exceedance (PoE) forecast plus a reserve margin 5 Key Findings • Unusual Early Peak 5 January 2015 15:30- 16:00 TI Demand of 3744 MW • SWIS demand growth flattening • IRCR mechanism continues to be effective • Customer behaviour changing rapidly • Healthy mix and diversity of generation capacity and DSM continues • No new generation or Demand Side Management (DSM) capacity will be required for the 2015 to 2025 forecast period 6 Forecasting presents Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Financing 2016 Year in Review
    2016 YEAR IN REVIEW Capital Financing This document was published on 15 December 2016. Steve Lambert, EGM Capital Financing A LOOK BACK OVER THE YEAR 2016 saw the theme of volatility and innovation continue, the importance of Asian investors and the growing power of self-managed superannuation for non-institutional investors in the domestic bond market. Last year in our Year in Review 2015 overview I spoke a capital account surplus. The importance of Asian about two common themes being innovation and investors in funding Australia has been consistent since volatility. Volatility saw markets closed at various times the Global Financial Crisis, be it through loans and/or due to many factors, often global in nature. In respect bonds. The importance of the offshore market cannot to innovation there was a strong move in how people be underestimated. Every year the percentage of the needed to find solutions to overcome this volatility and domestic market that is purchased from Asian investors other challenges. grows and the number and the variety of the investors from Asia are becoming more diverse both geographically In some respect those two themes continued in 2016. The and from the type of institution. We are also seeing more first few months of 2016 saw the low point of commodity activity from the Asian offices of a number of European or prices and a lot of uncertainty over global growth US fund managers. I don’t see this changing in 2017. generally and Chinese growth specifically. The market rebounded in March and we broadly saw a more friendly The other big theme is the power of self-managed issuing environment through the remainder of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Energy Dynamics Q3 2018
    Quarterly Energy Dynamics Q3 2018 Author: Market Insights | Markets Important notice PURPOSE AEMO has prepared this report to provide energy market participants and governments with information on the market dynamics, trends and outcomes during Q3 2018 (1 July to 30 September 2018). This quarterly report compares results for the quarter against other recent quarters, focussing on Q2 2018 and Q3 2017. Geographically, the report covers: • The National Electricity Market – which includes Queensland, New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. • The Wholesale Electricity Market operating in Western Australia. • The gas markets operating in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. DISCLAIMER This document or the information in it may be subsequently updated or amended. This document does not constitute legal or business advice, and should not be relied on as a substitute for obtaining detailed advice about the National Electricity Law, the National Electricity Rules, the Wholesale Electricity Market Rules, the National Gas Law, the National Gas Rules, the Gas Services Information Regulations or any other applicable laws, procedures or policies. AEMO has made every effort to ensure the quality of the information in this document but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by law, AEMO and its officers, employees and consultants involved in the preparation of this document: • make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this document; and • are not liable (whether by reason of negligence or otherwise) for any statements or representations in this document, or any omissions from it, or for any use or reliance on the information in it.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Energy Annual Report 2000
    IEAIEA WINDWIND ENERGYENERGY ANNUALANNUAL REPORTREPORT 20002000 International Energy Agency R&D Wind IEA Wind Energy Annual Report 2000 International Energy Agency (IEA) Executive Committee for the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research and Development of Wind Turbine Systems May 2001 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 United States of America Cover Photo These reindeer live in the vicinity of wind turbines at the Härjedälen site in Sweden. Photo Credit: Gunnär Britse FOREWORD he twenty-third IEA Wind Energy Annual Report reviews the progress during 2000 Tof the activities in the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research and Development of Wind Turbine Systems under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA). The agreement and its program, which is known as IEA R&D Wind, is a collaborative venture among 19 contracting parties from 17 IEA member countries and the European Commission. he IEA, founded in 1974 within the framework of the Organization for Economic TCo-operation and Development (OECD) to collaborate on comprehensive international energy programs, carries out a comprehensive program about energy among 24 of the 29 OECD member countries. his report is published by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in TColorado, United States, on behalf of the IEA R&D Wind Executive Committee. It is edited by P. Weis-Taylor with contributions from experts in participating organizations from Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy (two contracting par- ties), Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Jaap ´t Hooft Patricia Weis-Taylor Chair of the Secretary to the Executive Committee Executive Committee Web sites for additional information on IEA R&D Wind www.iea.org/techno/impagr/index.html www.afm.dtu.dk/wind/iea International Energy Agency iii CONTENTS Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Solar Wind Hydro
    National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Audit Audit Period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 COMPLIANCE AUDIT hydro solar biomass wind Prepared for The National GreenPower Steering Group October 2007 National GreenPower Accreditation Program Annual Audit Audit Period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 COMPLIANCE AUDIT hydro solar biomass wind Prepared for The National GreenPower Steering Group October 2007 URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 3, 116 Miller St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia Phone: +61 2 8925 5500 • Fax: +61 2 8925 5555 www.ap.urscorp.com Contents 1 Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Audit Scope 1-1 1.3 Audit Methodology 1-1 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions 1-2 1.5 Structure of this Report 1-3 1.6 List of Abbreviations 1-3 2 National GreenPower Accreditation Program 2006--------------------------------------------------------2-1 2.1 Overview 2-1 2.1.1 GreenPower Products 2-1 2.1.2 Rules of the Program 2-2 2.1.3 Mandatory Renewable Energy Target 2-2 2.1.4 NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme (GGAS) 2-2 2.1.5 GreenPower Generators 2-3 2.2 Participation 2-4 2.2.1 Reporting Period 2-4 2.2.2 GreenPower Product Providers/Products 2-4 2.3 Changes to GreenPower Products 2-5 2.3.1 GreenPower Customers 2-7 2.4 GreenPower Purchases and Sales 2-11 2.4.1 GreenPower Events, Events Customers and Events Sales 2-13 2.4.2 GreenPower Generation Sources 2-13 2.5 Energy from ‘Existing’ and ‘New’ GreenPower Generators 2-14 2.5.1
    [Show full text]