DOCSLIB.ORG

5-4 Economic and Financial Aspects of the Long-Term Management of High-Level Nuclear Waste: Issues and Approaches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5-4 Economic and Financial Aspects of the Long-Term Management of High-Level Nuclear Waste: Issues and Approaches March 2004 NWMO BACKGROUND PAPERS 5. ECONOMIC FACTORS 5-4 ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF THE LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT OF HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE: ISSUES AND APPROACHES Charles River Associates Canada Limited NWMO Background Papers NWMO has commissioned a series of background papers which present concepts and contextual information about the state of our knowledge on important topics related to the management of radioactive waste. The intent of these background papers is to provide input to defining possible approaches for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel and to contribute to an informed dialogue with the public and other stakeholders. The papers currently available are posted on NWMO’s web site. Additional papers may be commissioned. The topics of the background papers can be classified under the following broad headings: 1. Guiding Concepts – describe key concepts which can help guide an informed dialogue with the public and other stakeholders on the topic of radioactive waste management. They include perspectives on risk, security, the precautionary approach, adaptive management, traditional knowledge and sustainable development. 2. Social and Ethical Dimensions - provide perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of radioactive waste management. They include background papers prepared for roundtable discussions. 3. Health and Safety – provide information on the status of relevant research, technologies, standards and procedures to reduce radiation and security risk associated with radioactive waste management. 4. Science and Environment – provide information on the current status of relevant research on ecosystem processes and environmental management issues. They include descriptions of the current efforts, as well as the status of research into our understanding of the biosphere and geosphere. 5. Economic Factors - provide insight into the economic factors and financial requirements for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel. 6. Technical Methods - provide general descriptions of the three methods for the long- term management of used nuclear fuel as defined in the NFWA, as well as other possible methods and related system requirements. 7. Institutions and Governance - outline the current relevant legal, administrative and institutional requirements that may be applicable to the long-term management of spent nuclear fuel in Canada, including legislation, regulations, guidelines, protocols, directives, policies and procedures of various jurisdictions. Disclaimer This report does not necessarily reflect the views or position of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization, its directors, officers, employees and agents (the “NWMO”) and unless otherwise specifically stated, is made available to the public by the NWMO for information only. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who are solely responsible for the text and its conclusions as well as the accuracy of any data used in its creation. The NWMO does not make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information disclosed, or represent that the use of any information would not infringe privately owned rights. Any reference to a specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or preference by NWMO. Charles Economic and Financial Aspects of the Long-Term Management of High-Level Nuclear Waste: River Issues and Approaches Associates Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Objectives of this Report.................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Structure of the Report..................................................................................................................... 3 2. OVERVIEW OF ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ISSUES ............................................................... 5 2.1. Broad Themes in Economic and Financial Issues........................................................................... 5 2.2. Categorizing Economic and Financial Issues .................................................................................. 5 2.2.1. Cost Identification................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.2. Cost Comparison ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.3. Financing Adequacy and Sustainability .............................................................................. 9 3. COST IDENTIFICATION AND SUSTAINABLE FUNDING .......................................................... 11 3.1. Comprehensiveness: “Polluter-Pays” and Life-Cycle Costing Approaches.................................. 12 3.2. Cost Scope Factors........................................................................................................................ 13 3.2.1. Waste Volume................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2. Time-Lines ........................................................................................................................ 14 3.2.3. Discount Rate.................................................................................................................... 14 3.3. Uncertainty in Estimating Costs and Funding Requirements ........................................................ 15 4. COMPARING WASTE MANAGEMENT APPROACHES............................................................. 17 4.1. Assessing Benefits......................................................................................................................... 17 4.2. Types of Economic Comparison ....................................................................................................18 4.3. Welfare Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 19 4.3.1. Aggregate Measures......................................................................................................... 19 4.3.2. Distributional Measures .................................................................................................... 20 4.4. Economic Impact Analysis ............................................................................................................. 21 4.5. Analytical Limitations...................................................................................................................... 22 5. FINANCING WASTE MANAGEMENT APPROACHES ............................................................... 23 5.1. Funding Arrangements for Waste Management in Canada .......................................................... 24 5.1.1. Current Status ................................................................................................................... 24 5.1.2. Future Issues .................................................................................................................... 26 5.2. Fund Structures in Other Countries ............................................................................................... 27 5.2.1. Activities Covered by Funds ............................................................................................. 27 5.2.2. Valuation Methodologies................................................................................................... 28 5.2.3. Fund Contributors ............................................................................................................. 29 5.2.4. Rights and Liabilities ......................................................................................................... 29 5.2.5. Basis for Payments ........................................................................................................... 30 5.2.6. Accounting for Risk ........................................................................................................... 35 i Charles Economic and Financial Aspects of the Long-Term Management of High-Level Nuclear Waste: River Issues and Approaches Associates Table of Contents 5.3. Fund Management In Other Countries .......................................................................................... 38 5.3.1. Managing Organizations ................................................................................................... 38 5.3.2. Withdrawals....................................................................................................................... 42 5.3.3. Fund Auditing.................................................................................................................... 42 5.3.4. Investment and Risk Mitigation Strategy........................................................................... 43 APPENDIX – STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS............................................................. 47 NOTES........................................................................................................................................................ 52 ii Charles Economic and Financial Aspects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual-Report-And-Accounts-2019.Pdf
    Satisfying the changing needs of our customers Enabling the transition to a lower carbon future Annual Report and Accounts 2019 Group Snapshot Centrica plc is a leading international energy services and solutions provider focused on satisfying the changing needs of our customers and enabling the transition to a lower carbon future. The world of energy is changing rapidly and Centrica is now equipped to help customers transition to a lower carbon future, with capabilities and technologies to allow them to reduce their emissions. Therefore, we announced in July 2019 our intention to complete the shift towards the customer, by exiting oil and gas production. The Company’s two customer-facing divisions, Centrica Consumer and Centrica Business, are focused on their strengths of energy supply and its optimisation, and on services and solutions, with a continued strong focus on delivering high levels of customer service. Centrica is well placed to deliver for our customers, our shareholders and for society. We aim to be a good corporate citizen and an employer of choice. Technology is increasingly important in the delivery of energy and services to our customers. We are developing innovative products, offers and solutions, underpinned by investment in technology. We are targeting significant cost efficiency savings by 2022 to position Centrica as the lowest cost provider in its markets, consistent with our chosen brand positioning and propositions. Alongside our distinctive positions and capabilities, this will be a key enabler as we target
    [Show full text]
  • IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Costing Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes No
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series IAEA Nuclear No. NW-T-1.25 No. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Costing Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Costing Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste No. NW-T-1.25 Basic Costing Methods and Principles Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Objectives Disposal Programmes Guides Technical Reports INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA @ IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES Under the terms of Articles III.A.3 and VIII.C of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to “foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on the peaceful uses of atomic energy”. The publications in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series present good practices and advances in technology, as well as practical examples and experience in the areas of nuclear reactors, the nuclear fuel cycle, radioactive waste management and decommissioning, and on general issues relevant to nuclear energy. The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series is structured into four levels: (1) The Nuclear Energy Basic Principles publication describes the rationale and vision for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. (2) Nuclear Energy Series Objectives publications describe what needs to be considered and the specific goals to be achieved in the subject areas at different stages of implementation. (3) Nuclear Energy Series Guides and Methodologies provide high level guidance or methods on how to achieve the objectives related to the various topics and areas involving the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. (4) Nuclear Energy Series Technical Reports provide additional, more detailed information on activities relating to topics explored in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2018 Energy Prices In February 2018 the Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill was introduced to Parliament, which will put in place a requirement on the independent regulator, Ofgem, to cap energy tariffs until 2020. It will mean an absolute cap can be set on poor value tariffs, protecting the 11 million households in England, Wales and Scotland who are currently on a standard variable or other default energy tariff and who are not protected by existing price caps. An extension to Ofgem’s safeguard tariff cap was introduced in February 2018 which will see a further one million more vulnerable consumers protected from unfair energy price rises. Nuclear In June 2018 the Government announced a deal with the nuclear sector to ensure that nuclear energy continues to power the UK for years to come through major innovation, cutting-edge technology and ensuring a diverse and highly-skilled workforce. Key elements include: • a £200 million Nuclear Sector Deal to secure the UK’s diverse energy mix and drive down the costs of nuclear energy meaning cheaper energy bills for customers; • a £32 million boost from government and industry to kick-start a new advanced manufacturing programme including R&D investment to develop potential world-leading nuclear technologies like advanced modular reactors; • a commitment to increasing gender diversity with a target of 40% women working in the civil nuclear sector by 2030. 2017 Energy Policy In October 2017 the Government published The Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low carbon future, which aims to cut emissions while keeping costs down for consumers, creating good jobs and growing the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • NLF Annual Report 2018
    Protecting the future — Annual report and accounts 2018 nlf.uk.net “ The primary objective of the board is to achieve sufficiency of the Fund to meet certain costs of decommissioning EDFE’s eight nuclear power stations that are currently operating in the UK.” Richard Wohanka Chair Nuclear Liabilities Fund 1 — Contents 2 Chair’s statement 2 Protecting future generations 4 Strategic report 4 Our key performance indicators 8 Review of the year 12 Principal risks and uncertainties 14 Director’s report 14 Director’s report for the year ended 31 March 2018 20 Directors 20 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 22 Independent auditor’s report 22 Independent auditor’s report to the members of the Nuclear Liabilities Fund Limited 24 Financial statements 24 Statement of comprehensive income 25 Statement of financial position 26 Statement of changes in equity 27 Statement of cash flows 28 Notes to the financial statements 52 Company information Annual report and accounts 2018 Contents 2 Nuclear Liabilities Fund — Chair’s statement Protecting future generations The financial year ending 31 March 2018 was eventful for the Nuclear Liabilities Fund (‘NLF’ or the ‘Fund’) as preparations intensify for the start of decommissioning of the first Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors (‘AGR’) in the nuclear fleet of EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Limited (‘EDFE’). This is currently planned to commence in about five years’ time and will mark the start of a long journey that will take about 100 years to complete. As directors we are conscious of this timeline. Whilst we have to prepare for the large step up in payments % in a few years’ time with the first 80 reactor closure, we also have to seek to ensure there are sufficient funds to cover the final decommissioning Richard Wohanka costs that occur in the next century.
    [Show full text]
  • Decommissioning and Dismantling
    Decommissioning and dismantling Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen independent consultant member of the Nuclear Consulting Group July 2019 [email protected] Note In this document the references are coded by Q-numbers (e.g. Q6). Each reference has a unique number in this coding system, which is consistently used throughout all publications by the author. In the list at the back of the document the references are sorted by Q-number. The resulting sequence is not necessarily the same order in which the references appear in the text. m04decom+dism20190722 1 25 July 2019 Contents 1 Concepts and facts Decommissioning of nuclear power plants: three approaches Complete sequence of decommissioning and dismantling Legacy to be decommissioned and dismantled Radioactivity of reactors and other structures Dismantling of reprocessing plants Uncertain radioisotopic composition 2 Physical assessment Energy investment of decommissioning and dismantling Advanced reference reactor Radioactive waste 3 Practice and experiences Ambiguous definitions of decommissioning and dismantling Dismantled nuclear reactors Decommissioning of the West Valley reprocessing plant Cleanup of the Hanford Site Decommissioning in the UK Canadian NPD Closure Project 4 Costs and liabilities Decommissioning in the USA Decommissioning in the UK French estimate Extrapolation of Greifswald figures Swiss estimate View of the WNA Comments by Reuters Remarks 5 Responsibilities and liabilities: view of the nuclear industry View of the IAEA View of the WNA 6 Preditable problems for the future
    [Show full text]
  • Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants
    Nuclear Development 2016 Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants NEA Nuclear Development Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants © OECD 2016 NEA No. 7201 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This
    [Show full text]
  • Satisfying the Changing Needs of Our Customers
    Satisfying the changing needs of our customers Annual Report and Accounts 2018 Group Highlights Group Operational Group Financial Summary Performance (Year ended 31 December 2018) Total customer account holdings Group Revenue Return on average capital employed – Consumer (‘000) (ROACE) 2018 25,067 £29.7bn 13% 2017 25,316 2017: £28.0bn 2017: 14% 6% 1ppt Total customer account holdings Adjusted operating profit Statutory operating profit – Business (‘000) 2018 1,209 £1,392m £987m 2017 1,273 2017: £1,247m(1) 2017: £481m(1) 12% 105% Total customer gas consumption Adjusted earnings Statutory profit for the year (mmth) attributable to shareholders Total customer gas consumption 2018 12,465 £631m £183m 2017 11,630 2017: £693m(1) 2017: £328m(1) 9% 44% Total customer electricity Adjusted basic earning per share Statutory basic earning per share consumption (GWh) (EPS) Total customer electricity 2018 130,350 11.2p 3.3p 2017 133,869 2017: 12.5p(1) 2017: 5.9p(1) 10% 44% Direct Group headcount(2) Adjusted operating cash flow Statutory net cash flow Direct Group headcount from operating activities 2018 30,520 2017 33,138 £2,245m £1,934m 2017: £2,069m 2017: £1,840m 9% 5% Total recordable injury frequency Group net debt Net exceptional charge after taxation rate per 200,000 hours worked included in statutory profit Lost time injury frequency rate 2018 1.02† £2,656m £235m 2017 0.98 2017: £2,596m 2017: £476m 2% 51% (1) Restated for adoption of IFRS 15: revenue from contracts with customers. (2) Direct Group headcount excludes contractors, Read more about our Key Performance Indicators agency and outsourced staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel Agreement RM3787 for the Provision of Finance and Complex Legal Service
    Simmons & Simmons LLP Prospectus Panel Agreement RM3787 for the provision of Finance and Complex Legal Service March 2021 v.5 STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Managing COVID-19 Risks ................................................................................................................................... 2 A Brexit Focus ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Projects of Exceptional Innovation & Complexity .............................................................................................. 6 High Value/Complex Transactions and Disputes in Regulated Markets/Environments .............................. 8 Rescue, Restructuring & Insolvency .................................................................................................................. 10 Investment and Asset Management .................................................................................................................. 12 Financial Services, Market and Competitive Regulation ................................................................................ 14 Investment and Commercial Banking ................................................................................................................ 16 High Value/Complex Merger & Acquisition
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements
    Financial Statements 104 Independent Auditor’s Report 114 Group Income Statement 115 Group Statement of Comprehensive Income 116 Group Statement of Changes in Equity 117 Group Balance Sheet 118 Group Cash Flow Statement 119 Notes to the Financial Statements 196 Company Financial Statements 198 Notes to the Company Financial Statements 208 Gas and Liquids Reserves (Unaudited) 210 Ofgem Consolidated Segmental Statement Financial Statements Centrica plc Annual Report and Accounts 2019 103 Financial Statements | Independent Auditor’s Report Independent Auditor’s Report Report on the audit of the financial statements The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the Opinion preparation of the Group Financial Statements is applicable law and IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The financial In our opinion: reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of • the Financial Statements of Centrica plc (the ‘parent company’) the parent company Financial Statements is applicable law and and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) give a true and fair view of the United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 state of the Group’s and of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 “Reduced Disclosure Framework” (United Kingdom Generally December 2019 and of the Group’s loss for the year then ended; Accepted Accounting Practice). • the Group Financial Statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards Basis for opinion (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union; We conducted our audit in accordance with International • the parent company Financial Statements have been properly Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Accepted Accounting Practice, including Financial Reporting auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements Standard 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”; and section of our report.
    [Show full text]
  • 75359 the Nuclear Trust and Nuclear Liabilities Fund, Trustee-Director
    Trustee-Director | Nuclear Liabilities Fund Candidate brief for the position of Trustee-Director and Chair of Audit Committee The Nuclear Trust and Nuclear Liabilities Fund January 2020 c odgersberndtson.com 1 Trustee-Director | Nuclear Liabilities Fund Contents About the Nuclear Trust and Nuclear Liabilities Fund 3 The Board 4 The Role 5 The Individual 6 Additional Information 7 How to Apply 9 Candidate Charter 10 odgersberndtson.comodgersberndtson.com 2 Trustee-Director | Nuclear Liabilities Fund About the Nuclear Trust and Nuclear Liabilities Fund The Nuclear Liabilities Fund (NLF) holds approximately £9.5 billion and was established to help ensure that the industry can meet its security and environmental responsibilities regarding the waste management and decommissioning of nuclear power plants which are currently operational. Background The NLF was established in March 1996 to meet the costs of decommissioning the UK’s second-generation nuclear power stations, which are currently operated by EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Group (EDFE). It is a Scottish registered company controlled by The Nuclear Trust, a public Trust established under Scottish Law. The Fund helps ensure the industry is able to meet its security and environmental responsibilities with regard to the waste management and decommissioning of EDFE’s nuclear plants. By convention, the Trustees of the Nuclear Trust appoint themselves as directors of the NLF, with the Trust Chair chairing the NLF Board. Three of the Trustee-Directors are appointed by the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and two by EDFE. UK Government Investments (UKGI) is responsible for oversight of NLF governance and performance on behalf of BEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007-08 As I Was Able to Report in My Statement Last Year, Some 28% of the Fund’S Interest in BE Was Realised on 31 May 2007
    Company Number: SC164685 NUCLEAR LIABILITIES FUND LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2008 NUCLEAR LIABILITIES FUND LIMITED COMPANY INFORMATION Directors The Lady Balfour of Burleigh CBE Mr G Jenkins Ms A Richards Sir James Sassoon Mr D Stewart CVO Secretary Mr D A Venus PKF (UK) LLP Farringdon Place 20 Farringdon Road London EC1M 3AP Company Number SC164685 Registered Office 16 Rothesay Place Edinburgh EH3 7SQ Auditors Deloitte & Touche LLP Chartered Accountants London Solicitors Linklaters LLP 1 Silk Street London EC2Y 8HQ Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP 1 Exchange Crescent Conference Square Edinburgh EH3 8UL Bankers HSBC Bank Plc Mariner House Pepys Street London EC3N 4DA Investment Managers State Street Global Advisors 21 St James's Square London SW1 4SS LaSalle Investment Management 19 Hanover Square London W1R 9DA Custodians HSBC Bank Plc Global Investor Services Mariner House Pepys Street London EC3N 4DA NUCLEAR LIABILITIES FUND LIMITED CONTENTS Page CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT 1 - 2 DIRECTORS' REPORT 3 - 6 STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES 7 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 8 - 9 PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 10 STATEMENT OF TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSES 11 BALANCE SHEET 12 CASH FLOW STATEMENT 13 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 14 - 27 NUCLEAR LIABILITIES FUND LIMITED CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2008 The directors are pleased to present the twelfth An nual Report of Nuclear Liabilities Fund Limited (th e "Fund") for the year to 31 March 2008. Purpose of the Fund The Fund was incorporated on 28 March 1996 with the principal object of providing arrangements for funding certain long-term costs of decommissioning the nuclear power stations of British Energy plc (“BE”) existing at 20 March 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Decommissioning Costs
    Nuclear decommissioning costs Extract from the July 2017 Fiscal risks report 6.90 The uncertain future costs of safely decommissioning the UK’s nuclear sites are a material source of fiscal risk. For the older sites, these are the largest single accounting provision in the WGA. Risks relate to the uncertain scope of the decommissioning work, which in turn reflects uncertainties about the amount of nuclear waste that will have to be cleared up and the technologies that will be available to do so, especially over the very long term. 6.91 The costs are managed in different ways, reflecting distinct phases of construction of nuclear facilities in the UK. They form three broad groups: Older sites (the Sellafield reprocessing plant and 16 of the UK’s earliest nuclear sites, including the old Magnox nuclear power stations – the last of which ceased operating at the end of 2015). For these sites, future decommissioning costs fall entirely to government. They are reported as a provision in the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) accounts. The cash flows associated with this provision are funded from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) DEL. The second generation of sites (the advanced gas-cooled reactor power stations and Sizewell B). Ownership of these power stations and the costs of decommissioning and managing their waste were transferred to the private sector through the privatisation of British Energy in 1996. British Energy was restructured and subsequently acquired by EDF Energy in 2009. As part of the arrangements for privatisation, the Government set up the Nuclear Liabilities Fund (NLF), an independent segregated trust.
    [Show full text]