THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — RALPH WALDO EMERSON Celebrating 50 Years in Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — RALPH WALDO EMERSON Celebrating 50 Years in Arizona WHERE NATURE MEETS NURTURE APRIL 2016 ESCAPE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — RALPH WALDO EMERSON Celebrating 50 Years in Arizona Hart Prairie Preserve, Northern Arizona “Nature always wears the spirit.” of the colors always “Nature PLUS THE NATURAL WONDER OF WILD HORSES CRESTED CARACARAS SAVING OUR NATIONAL FORESTS NAVAJO NATIONAL MONUMENT JACKS CANYON Grand Canyon National Park Navajo National Monument Flagstaff Sedona Cottonwood Payson Lower Salt River PHOENIX April 2016 Aravaipa Canyon Tucson 2 EDITOR’S LETTER POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE 3 CONTRIBUTORS 4 LETTERS 5 THE JOURNAL People, places and things from around ◗ A young Arizona treefrog, still sport- the state, including a look back at iconic ing its tadpole tail, rests on floating photographer Barry Goldwater; Navajo vegetation in a Flagstaff backyard. National Monument; crested caracaras; The species is the official state and the history of St. Mary’s, the state’s amphibian. John Sherman oldest hospital. NIKON D7200, 1/500 SEC, F/10, ISO 500, 280 MM LENS FRONT COVER: The sun sets on the 16 WHERE NATURE lush vegetation of Hart Prairie MEETS NURTURE Preserve near Flagstaff. The preserve is one of The Nature Conservancy’s /azhighways In 1966, The Nature Conservancy made its GET MORE Arizona projects. Claire Curran first purchase in Arizona when it acquired @azhighways ONLINE CANON EOS 5D MARK III, 0.3 SEC, the Patagonia-Sonoita Creek Preserve. @arizonahighways F/22, ISO 400, 45 MM LENS Although its mission has evolved and www.arizonahighways.com BACK COVER: The flowers of an expanded over the past 50 years, the ancient saguaro bloom beneath organization is still working to protect the a night sky at Sonoran Desert state’s most threatened landscapes. National Monument southwest By Kathy Montgomery of Phoenix. Jack Dykinga NIKON D4S, 25 SEC, F/5, 26 THIS IS DIFFERENT ISO 2500, 24 MM LENS In the interest of full disclosure, we aren’t 46 WILD sure how many saguaro photos we’ve pub- An essay about horses, human nature and lished over the past 91 years. We do know, the struggle for balance. however, that we’ve never seen anything By Kelly Vaughn quite like this. A Portfolio by Jack Dykinga 52 SCENIC DRIVE Forest Road 618: Ancient cliff dwellings, 34 CUTTING IT DOWN TO SIZE petroglyphs, one-lane bridges and rolling Arizona is home to the largest stand of hills are just some of what you’ll see along ponderosa pines in the world. Its size is this scenic drive in the Verde Valley. impressive. Its health is not — the woods By Noah Austin are too dense. Thus, the Four Forest Resto- Photographs by Nick Berezenko ration Initiative, an unprecedented, ambi- tious and controversial effort to thin and 54 HIKE OF THE MONTH restore 2.4 million acres on four national forests in the state. The timeline is Jacks Canyon Trail: Of all the scenic 20 years. Time will tell. canyons in Red Rock Country, Jacks Canyon is perhaps the most obscure. And By Terry Greene Sterling so is the trail that cuts through it. It’s quiet, Photographs by Tom Bean but that’s just another selling point. By Robert Stieve Photograph by Shane McDermott 56 WHERE IS THIS? 2 OCTOBER 2015 PHOTOGRAPHIC PRINTS AVAILABLE Prints of some photographs in this issue are available for purchase. To view options, visit www.arizona highwaysprints.com. For more information, call 866-962-1191. www.arizonahighways.com 1 editor’s LETTER CONTRIBUTORS CLAIRE CURRAN called a feller buncher, and she saw firsthand Claire Curran is a corporate and editorial pho- what can happen when an overgrown forest goes APRIL 2016 VOL. 92, NO. 4 tographer, but she says landscape photography up in flames. “is a time for me to let my vision soar.” That It was five years ago next month that the Wal- 800-543-5432 happened on this month’s cover photo, which www.arizonahighways.com low Fire — the worst in state history — was Curran made at Hart Prairie, the site of a Nature ignited by a careless backpacker. Eventually, the Conservancy project near Flagstaff (seeWhere PUBLISHER Win Holden fire consumed 538,000 acres of alpine forest in Nature Meets Nurture, page 16). “Hart Prairie is a EDITOR Robert Stieve spent about a year the White Mountains of Arizona. I wrote a blog wonderful destination for photographers,” she ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER, in Aravaipa Canyon. post during the fire. It was published by The DIRECTOR OF says. “Every time I go, the scouting I do turns up SALES & MARKETING Kelly Mero EDWARD ABBEY “[It’s the] longest I’ve Nature Conservancy. something new. Summer is a great time to photograph it, because from May to Septem- MANAGING EDITOR Kelly Vaughn held a steady job since ... I was drummed out ... Time will tell what’s left of the woods when the ber, something is in bloom. The 360-degree view is made for monsoon cloud displays. ASSOCIATE EDITOR Noah Austin of the Army in ’47,” he wrote. He’d been hired Wallow Fire has finally finished burning, but this much And the San Francisco Peaks complete the photographic gem.” Curran scouted this EDITORIAL ADMINISTRATOR Nikki Kimbel in 1972 to manage a newly established pre- we know: One of the most beautiful places in the world, location during the day and thought she’d shoot it at sunset. “Luck was with me, as the PHOTOGRAPHY EDITOR Jeff Kida serve there. Mostly, he monitored the wildlife, one of my favorite places in Arizona, is being destroyed, sun set in line with the rosebush,” she says. “The warm backlight on the rosebush and the CREATIVE DIRECTOR Barbara Glynn Denney patrolled the canyon and tried to keep the hunt- and it’ll never be the same. Not in my lifetime, not in lupines, for me, makes the photo.” Curran is a longtime Arizona Highways contributor. ART DIRECTOR Keith Whitney ers out. In his spare time, he went skinny-dipping in the creek and wrote the your lifetime, and not in the lifetime of the perpetrator MAP DESIGNER Kevin Kibsey final chapters of his defining novel, The Monkey Wrench Gang. who ignited this mess. ... PRODUCTION DIRECTOR Michael Bianchi Turns out, he also wrote inflammatory letters to the editor, which didn’t Whether a catastrophic fire is started by BRUCE D. TAUBERT sit well with the local community of conservative ranchers. Whether it was human negligence or Mother Nature, the effects WEBMASTER Victoria J. Snow Bruce D. Taubert is among many photographers who con- the letters or the skinny-dipping, Mr. Abbey was eventually fired by Defend- are the same, and that’s what the Four Forest CIRCULATION DIRECTOR Nicole Bowman tributed to this month’s essay on the Salt River horses (see ers of Wildlife, which had partnered with The Nature Conservancy in 1970 Restoration Initiative is attempting to prevent. FINANCE DIRECTOR Bob Allen Wild, page 46). Before heading out recently to photograph to create the Aravaipa Canyon Preserve. It was TNC’s third acquisition in Time will tell. Meanwhile, there’s at least one OPERATIONS/IT MANAGER Cindy Bormanis the horses, Taubert’s only knowledge of them came from Arizona. The first, in 1966, was a 309-acre stretch of Sonoita Creek near Pata- forest in Arizona that seems to be thriving. the newspaper or the nightly news. So when he spotted a gonia, which later became known as the Patagonia-Sonoita Creek Preserve. In Saguaro National Park’s Tucson Mountain CORPORATE OR TRADE SALES 602-712-2019 group of 12 horses leaving the river on his first morning of A few years later, that site was designated a National Natural Landmark. District, the number of saguaros has increased SPONSORSHIP SALES shooting, he thought the assignment would be easy. “What REPRESENTATION On Media Publications There are several reasons the area draws so much attention. The main rea- by nearly 70 percent since 1990. Concerns about Lesley Bennett I didn’t know was that in the winter, the horses spend very son is the streamside habitat, which is one of the state’s best examples of declining numbers led the park to institute a 602-445-7160 little time near the water,” he says. “I trekked around the a Fremont cottonwood-Goodding willow riparian forest. Some of the cot- saguaro census back in 1930, and the decline per- desert with the horses, but if I was doing images about tonwoods down there are more than 100 feet tall and 130 years old, ranking sisted through the 1960s. However, if the current LETTERS TO THE EDITOR [email protected] horses and the Salt River, I thought I should have at least a 2039 W. Lewis Avenue them among the largest and oldest in the country. trend continues, scientists believe the forest will Phoenix, AZ 85009 few images of them in the river.” Taubert consulted with story author Kelly Vaughn, who As I write this, The Nature Conservancy is just weeks away from a party rebound to historical levels. That’s good news for told him about a spot where he might be able to find the animals in the water. “Over the in Patagonia to celebrate the chapter’s 50th anniversary in Arizona — the landscape photographers. And it’s good for us, too. GOVERNOR Douglas A. Ducey next week, I spent about 20 hours at the river’s edge before I spotted a band in the river,” organization was founded nationally in 1951. Although TNC’s mission is still I have no idea how many saguaro photos we’ve Taubert says. “As usual, luck and some genetic stubbornness paid off.” Taubert’s current DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT based on conserving land and water, its approach has evolved over the years.
Recommended publications
  • Sonora Sucker
    scientific name common name Catostomus insignis Sonora sucker Bison code 010520 ______________________________________________________________ Official status Endemism ________________________ State AZ: threatened Colorado River Basin _______________________ Status/threats Dams, diversions, groundwater pumping and introduced species Distribution The species is widespread and abundant in the Gila and Bill Williams river drainages in Arizona and the Gila and San Francisco drainages in southwestern New Mexico. The species is widespread and abundant in the Verde and Gila headwaters. Habitat Streams and rivers from 300 to 3000 m in elevation, primarily in pool habitats. Pool habitats over sand gravel substrates. Life history and ecology Can attain a size of 0.8 m and a weight of greater than 2.0 kg. Used as food by early, primitive human populations. Food habits vary with availability. In one stream, Aravaipa Creek, it is principally a carnivore, whereas elsewhere in pool habitats diet consists of plant debris, mud, and algae. Observed to "suck" cottonwood seeds at surface as is common for the common carp. Young often feed in large schools at stream margins on micro-crustaceans, protozoans and other animal and plant groups. Breeding Similar to most slim-bodied suckers, the species spawns in smaller streams over gravel substrates. Males darken in color and often display extreme tuberculation. Males &(usually 2) flank a single, larger female. Gametes are emitted with considerable to extreme substrate agitation and fall into gravel interstices. Cleaning of gravels occurs much as reported for salmonid species. Key Habitat Components: pools with sand-gravel substrates for adults and shallow, low velocity riffles and backwaters for young Breeding season Protracted, from as early as January to February at low elevations to as late as July.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Galiuro Mountains Unit, Graham County, Arizona MLA 21
    I MI~A~J~L M)P~SAL OF CORONADO I NATIONAL FOREST, PART 9 I Galiuro Mountains Unit I Graham County, Arizona I Galiuro Muni~Untains I i A IZON I,' ' I BUREAU OF MINES UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR f United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF MINES INTERMOUNTAIN FIELD OPERATIONS CENTER "m II P.O. BOX 25086 II BUILDING 20, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER DENVER, COLORADO 80225 November 22, 1993 Nyal Niemuth Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources 1502 West Washington Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Mr. Niemuth: Enclosed are two copies of the following U.S. Bureau of Mines Open File Report for your use: MLA 21-93 Mineral Appraisal of the Coronado National Forest, Part 9, Galiuro Mountains Unit, Graham County, Arizona If you would like additional copies, please notify Mark Chatman at 303-236-3400. Resource Evaluation Branch I i I MINERAL APPRAISAL OF THE CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST PART 9, GALIURO MOUNTAINS UNIT, I GRAHAM COUNTY, ARIZONA I I by. I S. Don Brown I MLA 21-93 I 1993 I I, i Intermountain Field Operations Center I Denver, Colorado I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES I HERMANN ENZER, Acting Director I I I PREFACE I A January 1987 Interagency Agreement between the U.S. Bureau of Mines, U.S. Geological Survey, and U.S. Forest Service describes the purpose, authority, and I program operation for the forest-wide studies. The program is intended to assist the I Forest Service in incorporating mineral resource data in forest plans as specified by the National Forest Management Act (1976) and Title 36, Chapter 2, Part 219, Code of i Federal Regulations, and to augment the Bureau's mineral resource data base so that it can analyze and make available minerals information as required by the National I Materials and Minerals Policy, Research and Development Act (1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Marana Regional Sports Complex
    Draft Environmental Assessment Marana Regional Sports Complex Town of Marana Pima County, Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office August 2008 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARANA REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX Prepared for Bureau of Reclamation 6150 West Thunderbird Road Glendale, Arizona 85306 Attn: John McGlothlen (623) 773-6256 on behalf of Town of Marana 11555 West Civic Center Drive, Building A2 Marana, Arizona 85653 Attn: Corby Lust Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 2120 North Central Avenue, Suite 130 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 www.swca.com (602) 274-3831 SWCA Project No. 12313 i CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND NEED........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Project .............................................................................................1 1.3 Location........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Public Involvement/Scoping Process ........................................................................................... 1 1.5 Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and Zoning ................................................................. 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to the GEOLOGY of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: the Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island
    A GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA: THE GEOLOGY AND LIFE ZONES OF A MADREAN SKY ISLAND ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 22 JOHN V. BEZY Inside front cover. Sabino Canyon, 30 December 2010. (Megan McCormick, flickr.com (CC BY 2.0). A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island John V. Bezy Arizona Geological Survey Down-to-Earth 22 Copyright©2016, Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved Book design: M. Conway & S. Mar Photos: Dr. Larry Fellows, Dr. Anthony Lux and Dr. John Bezy unless otherwise noted Printed in the United States of America Permission is granted for individuals to make single copies for their personal use in research, study or teaching, and to use short quotes, figures, or tables, from this publication for publication in scientific books and journals, provided that the source of the information is appropriately cited. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new or collective works, or for resale. The reproduction of multiple copies and the use of articles or extracts for comer- cial purposes require specific permission from the Arizona Geological Survey. Published by the Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, #100, Tucson, AZ 85701 www.azgs.az.gov Cover photo: Pinnacles at Catalina State Park, Courtesy of Dr. Anthony Lux ISBN 978-0-9854798-2-4 Citation: Bezy, J.V., 2016, A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Laughing Waters" 40
    Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. 1986. Numerical recipes: C 1990 by S.E.L & Associates The art of scientific computing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Stalnaker, C. B. 1978. The IFG incremental methodology for physical instream habitat eval- uation. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS / OBS-78 /81). Stier, D. J., and J. H. Crance. 1985. Habitat suitability index models and instream flow suitability curves: American shad. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS/ OBS-82 /10). The Recreational Impact of Trihey, E. W. 1979. The IFG incremental methodology. Pages 24-44 in G. L. Smith, editor. Proceedings of the workshop in instream flow habitat criteria and modeling. Information Series Reducing the "Laughing Waters" 40. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, Colorado Water Resources Research Institute. Valdez, R. A., and B. C. Nilson. 1982. Radiotelemetry as a means of assessing movement and of Aravaipa Creek, Arizona habitat selection of humpback chub. Pages 29-39 in W. Geer, editor. Transactions of the Bonneville Chapter of the American Fisheries Society. Salt Lake City, UT: Bonneville Chapter of the American Fisheries Society. Steven D. Moore Valdez, R. A., P. B. Holden, T. B. Hardy, and R. J. Ryel. 1987. Habitat suitability index curves Mary E. Wilkosz* for endangered fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Final report to US. Fish and Wildlife Service (Contract No. 14-16-0006-86-055), Denver, CO. Stanley K. Brickler Received: May 3, 1989 School of Renewable Natural Resources Accepted: June 25, 1989 University of Arizona Discussion open until August 1, 1990 Tucson, Arizona 85721 ABSTRACT: The paper describes analyses that were conducted to de- termine the importance of water as an attribute of the recreational setting at Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness, Arizona, and the influence that reduced flows in Aravaipa Creek would have on visitors' perceptions of water quantity and quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Aravaipa Canyon Ecosystem Management Plan
    BLM Aravaipa Ecosystem Management Plan Final Aravaipa and Environmental Assessment Ecosystem Management Plan and Environmental Assessment Arizona • Gila District • Safford Field Office Field • Safford •District Gila Arizona September 2015 i April 2015 Mission Statements Bureau of Land Management The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is responsible for managing the National System of Public Lands and its resources in a combination of ways, which best serves the needs of the American people. The BLM balances recreational, commercial, scientific and cultural interests and it strives for long-term protection of renewable and nonrenewable resources, including range, timber, minerals, recreation, watershed, fish and wildlife, wilderness and natural, scenic, scientific and cultural values. It is the mission of the BLM to sustain the health, diversity and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Arizona Game and Fish Department The mission of the Arizona Game and Fish Department is to conserve Arizona’s diverse wildlife resources and manage for safe, compatible outdoor recreation opportunities for current and future generations. The Nature Conservancy The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. Cover photo: Aravaipa Creek. Photo © Greg Gamble/TNC BLM/AZ/PL-08/006 ii United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Safford Field Office 711 South 14th Avenue, Suite A Safford, Arizona 8 5546~3335 www.blm.gov/azl September 15, 2015 In Reply Refer To: 8372 (0010) Dear Reader: The document accompanying this letter contains the Final Aravaipa Ecosystem Management Plan, Environmental Assessment, Finding ofNo Significant Impact, and Decision Record.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Top Things to Do in Sedona
    100 Top Things to Do in Sedona Sedona is known for its magnificent, towering red rocks and spectacular panoramas. Visitors can find an amazing variety of things to do in the area, such as jeep or air tours, float or kayaking trips, hiking or mountain biking, sightseeing trips to ancient Indian ruins, shopping in world-class art galleries and day trips to the Grand Canyon and nearby national monuments. To help plan your perfect vacation here’s a list to choose from. If you see something you like, please ask our concierge. They would be happy to provide directions or book your excursion. • Take a Jeep Tour, ranked the number one activity by visitors to Sedona. • Shop the Unique Shops, shopping areas include Tlaquepaque, Hillside, Uptown and more • Visit the Local Art Galleries, Sedona is a premier destination for art lovers • Spa Day at the eforea: spa by Hilton, our concierge would be happy to book your appointment • Dine at One of Many Sedona World Class Restaurants, the city offers an exceptional variety of dining options • Ride the Sedona Trolley, fully narrated tours providing information on history, geology, flora and fauna • Play a Round of Championship Golf, the Sedona Golf Resort is conveniently located adjacent to the resort and the Oak Creek Country Club is a mile away • Slide Rock State Park, Nature's Slip-n-Slide. Cool off at a natural rock slide. Sun bathe, have a picnic • Visit the Vortexes, purported to increase spiritual growth and personal enlightenment • Book a Vortex Tour, Experience the mystical energy sources • Experience
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas
    Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas William L. Halvorson and Brooke S. Gebow, editors Technical Report No. 68 United States Geological Survey Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USGS Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona, Tucson The Sonoran Desert Field Station (SDFS) at The University of Arizona is a unit of the USGS Western Ecological Research Center (WERC). It was originally established as a National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) in 1973 with a research staff and ties to The University of Arizona. Transferred to the USGS Biological Resources Division in 1996, the SDFS continues the CPSU mission of providing scientific data (1) to assist U.S. Department of Interior land management agencies within Arizona and (2) to foster cooperation among all parties overseeing sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region. It also is charged with making its data resources and researchers available to the interested public. Seventeen such field stations in California, Arizona, and Nevada carry out WERC’s work. The SDFS provides a multi-disciplinary approach to studies in natural and cultural sciences. Principal cooperators include the School of Renewable Natural Resources and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at The University of Arizona. Unit scientists also hold faculty or research associate appointments at the university. The Technical Report series distributes information relevant to high priority regional resource management needs. The series presents detailed accounts of study design, methods, results, and applications possibly not accommodated in the formal scientific literature. Technical Reports follow SDFS guidelines and are subject to peer review and editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 AESO/SE 2-21-98-F-399 July 29, 1999 John McGee, Forest Supervisor Coronado National Forest 300 W. Congress Tucson, Arizona 85701 RE: On-going and Long-term Grazing Consultation Dear Mr. McGee: This document transmits the Fish and Wildlife Service's final biological opinion on the proposed On-going and Long-term Grazing on the Coronado National Forest (Forest) in New Mexico (Hidalgo County) and Arizona (Cochise, Santa Cruz, Pima, Pinal, and Graham Counties) following section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your November 5, 1998, request for formal consultation was received on November 5, 1998. By letter of March 26, 1999, we extended the 90-day consultation period by 60 days. The draft biological opinion was delivered to you on April 16, 1999. We received your comments on the draft opinion and a summary of applicant comments and their original comments on June 21, 1999. We appreciate the cooperation and assistance of your staff and permittees during the consultation period. We look forward to assisting the Coronado National Forest with the implementation of this biological opinion. If you have any questions on the biological opinion please contact me or Doug Duncan (520/670-4860). Sincerely, /s/ David L. Harlow Field Supervisor 2 Enclosures: biological opinion zip disk 2 cc: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM (GARD-AZ/NM, PARD-ES) Field Supervisor, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico DKD:finalbo.cnf BIOLOGICAL OPINION On-going and Long-term Grazing on the Coronado National Forest Arizona Ecological Services Field Office US Fish and Wildlife Service AESO/SE 2-21-98-F-399 July 29, 1999 Mr.
    [Show full text]