DOCSLIB.ORG

Oil Spill Contingency Plan 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oil Spill Contingency Plan 2021 Page 1 of 85 Southampton Marine Department Safety Management System Oil Spill Contingency Plan 2021 For amendments/updates, please contact: Deputy Harbour Master Associated British Ports Southampton Ocean Gate Atlantic Way Southampton SO14 3QN Tel: 02380 608202 Date of Issue: 1st May 2021 Version: 3.0 Authorised: S. Masters Version Date: March 2021 Owner: S. Masters Page 2 of 85 Southampton Marine Department Safety Management System Contents List of Plan Holders ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Revision Procedure ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Amendment Record ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Statutory Requirement ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Purpose of the Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Scope of Plan .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 1.1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.4 Interfacing Oil Spill Contingency Plans ........................................................................................................................... 13 1.4.1 Oil Company and Local Installation Plans ............................................................................................................... 13 1.4.2 Local Authority Plans ................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.4.3 Adjacent Harbour Authority Oil Spill Plans .............................................................................................................. 14 1.4.4 Marinas within the Port Area ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1.4.5 National Contingency Plan (NCP) ............................................................................................................................. 15 1.4.6 The SOLFIRE Plan ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 Consultation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.6 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 1.2 Interfacing Oil Spill Contingency Plan ...................................................................................................................... 18 1.7 Classification of Oil Spills ................................................................................................................................................. 19 1.8 Tidal Movement of Oil on Southampton Water ................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 1.3 Southampton Tidal Curves ................................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix 1a Fawley Marine Terminal and BP Hamble Terminal Areas of Responsibility .......................................................... 21 Appendix 1b Port of Marchwood, Area of Responsibility ......................................................................................................... 23 2. Incident Response Organisation ............................................................................................................................................ 24 2.1 Harbour Master .................................................................................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Oil Spill Management Team (OMT) ................................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Protracted Incidents .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.4 Tier 1 Incident .................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.1 Oil Terminals and Local Installations ....................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.2 All Other Harbour Areas including Dock Complexes .............................................................................................. 25 2.5 Tier 2 Incidents .................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Figure 2.1 Normal Organisational Structure ....................................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Tier 3 Incident .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.7 Tactical Coordinating Group (TCG) and Strategic Coordinating Group (SCG) ............................................................. 27 2.8 Environment Group ........................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.9 Simultaneous Oil Spills ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.10 Response Specific to Fawley Marine Terminal (FMT) ................................................................................................... 28 2.10.1 Specific to Fawley Marine Terminal. ....................................................................................................................... 28 2.10.2 Harbour Master ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 2.10.3 Oil Spill Management Team (OMT) for Fawley based Incidents ............................................................................ 30 2.10.4 Tier 1 Incidents ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.10.5 Tier 2 Incidents ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.10.6 Tier 2A Incident ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.10.7 Tier 2B Incident ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 Version: 3.0 Authorised: S. Masters Version Date: March 2021 Owner: S. Masters Page 3 of 85 Southampton Marine Department Safety Management System 2.10.8 Tier 3 Incident .......................................................................................................................................................... 32 2.10.9 Tier 2A Response – Organisational Chart .............................................................................................................. 34 2.10.10 Tier 2B Response – Organisational Chart ............................................................................................................ 35 2.10.11 Oil Spill Reporting Form ........................................................................................................................................ 36 2.10.12 Oil Spill Progress Report for FMT ......................................................................................................................... 36 3. Reporting Procedures ............................................................................................................................................................. 36 3.1 Use of Section ................................................................................................................................................................... 36 3.2 Prevention of Oil Pollution Acts 1971 & 1986 .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marchwood Power Limited Marchwood Power Station Oceanic Way Marchwood Industrial Park Marchwood Southampton SO40 4BD
    Notice of variation and consolidation with introductory note The Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Marchwood Power Limited Marchwood Power Station Oceanic Way Marchwood Industrial Park Marchwood Southampton SO40 4BD Variation application number EPR/BL6217IM/V010 Permit number EPR/BL6217IM Variation and consolidation application number EPR/BL6217IM/V010 1 Marchwood Power Station Permit number EPR/BL6217IM Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the notice. Under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 (schedule 5, part 1, paragraph 19) a variation may comprise a consolidated permit reflecting the variations and a notice specifying the variations included in that consolidated permit. Schedule 2 of the notice comprises a consolidated permit which reflects the variations being made. All the conditions of the permit have been varied and are subject to the right of appeal. Purpose of this variation: Article 21(3) of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) requires the Environment Agency to review conditions in permits that it has issued and to ensure that the permit delivers compliance with relevant standards, within four years of the publication of updated decisions on Best Available Techniques (BAT) Conclusions. We have reviewed the permit for this installation against the revised BAT Conclusions for the large combustion plant sector published on 17th August 2017. Only activities covered by this BAT Reference Document have been reviewed and assessed. This variation makes the below changes following the review under Article 21(3) of the IED and the consolidation of the Environmental Permitting Regulations that came into force on the 4 January 2017: Revised emission limits and monitoring requirements for emissions to air applicable from 17 August 2021 in table S3.1a; Inclusion of process monitoring for energy efficiency in table S3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • (Public) 17/09/2013, 17.00
    Public Document Pack CABINET DOCUMENTS FOR THE MEMBERS ROOM Tuesday, 17th September, 2013 at 5.00 pm MEMBERS ROOM DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO THE LISTED REPORTS Contacts Cabinet Administrator Judy Cordell Tel: 023 8083 2766 Email: [email protected] MEMBERS ROOM DOCUMENTS 14 HAMPSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE PLAN: ADOPTION Inspectors’ report into the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (2013). Saved policies of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan (1998). Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2007). Minerals and Waste Plan for adoption (2013). Inspector’s ‘Main Modifications’. Inspector’s ‘Additional Modifications’. Hampshire County Council’s Cabinet report. List of Southampton sites in background document potentially suitable for waste management facilities. Summary of consultation responses (2013). Monday, 9 September HEAD OF LEGAL , HR AND DEMOCRATIC SERVICES 2013 Agenda Item 14 Report to Hampshire County Council, Portsmouth City Council, Southampton City Council, New Forest National Park Authority and South Downs National Park Authority by Andrew S Freeman, BSc(Hons) DipTP DipEM FRTPI FCIHT MIEnvSc an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government rd Date : 23 May 2013 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 (AS AMENDED) SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION INTO THE HAMPSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE PLAN LOCAL PLAN Document submitted for examination on 29 February 2012 Examination hearings held between 6 to 8 June 2012, 11 to 15 June 2012 and 13 to 14 March 2013 File Ref: PINS/Q1770/429/7 ABBREVIATIONS USED
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Application
    Application F/19/86707 Number: Case Officer: Andy Grandfield Received Date: 22/10/2019 Site Address: Southampton International Airport, Mitchell Way, Eastleigh, Southampton, SO18 2HG Applicant: Southampton International Airport Ltd. Proposal: Construction of a 164 metre runway extension at the northern end of the existing runway, associated blast screen to the north of the proposed runway extension, removal of existing bund and the reconfiguration and extension of existing long stay car parking to the east and west of Mitchell Way to provide additional long stay spaces Recommendation: In consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of Full Council to delegate to the Head of Housing and Development to PERMIT subject to: (1) The conditions set out below with delegated authority to make minor amendments to the conditions to ensure they dovetail with, and do not duplicate the section 106 agreement. (2) completion of a Section 106 agreement securing the following: - A Vehicle Cap on Traffic Movements to restrict vehicle movements to the airport to 2.45 million; - Bi-annual review of the Airport Surface Access Strategy and Staff Green Travel Plan; - A Noise Insulation Policy and Noise Action Plan for residential and sensitive non-residential buildings; - Noise monitoring, noise contours and noise contour cap with annual report to the Council demonstrating compliance with the noise contour; Page | 1 - Air Quality Strategy; - Health Strategy including Community Health Fund; - Carbon Strategy; - Ecological Management and Mitigation to include Air Quality monitoring; - Construction Employment and Skills Plan; - Operational Employment and Skills Plan; - Safeguarding of the route of the proposed Chickenhall Lane Link Road; - Revoking of previous S106 Agreements and inclusion of previous restrictive obligations within a new agreement including restrictions on night time flying, engine testing, 20 ATMs within 0600 – 0700, reverse thrust, noise cap contour.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Portsmouth Site Allocations Document
    Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Portsmouth Site Allocations Document Screening Statement Client: Portsmouth City Council UE-0060 Portsmouth CC Site Allocations Report No.: HRA Screening_6_20130219 Version: 6 Status: Draft Final Date: February 2013 Author: SPS/NEJP Checked: SPS Approved: NEJP HRA for the Portsmouth Site Allocations Development Plan Document: Screening Statement February 2013 UE-0060 Portsmouth CC Site Allocations HRA Screening_6_20130219 Contents Executive Summary i E1 Introduction i E2 Scope of the Assessment i E3 Findings ii E4 Conclusions and Consultation Arrangements iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose and Structure of this Document 1 1.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment 2 1.4 Portsmouth Local Development Framework 3 2 Methodology 7 2.1 Guidance and Best Practice 7 2.2 Methodology 7 2.3 Consideration of Effects 8 3 European Sites 11 3.1 Scope of the Assessment 11 3.2 Site Descriptions 11 3.3 Qualifying Features 11 3.4 SAC and SPA Conservation Objectives 16 3.5 Conservation Objectives for Ramsar Sites 17 3.6 Key Environmental Conditions Supporting Site Integrity 17 4 Likely Significant Effects 19 4.1 Introduction 19 4.2 Results 19 4.3 In Combination Test 21 5 Commentary 23 5.1 Introduction 23 HRA for the Portsmouth Site Allocations Development Plan Document: Screening Statement February 2013 UE-0060 Portsmouth CC Site Allocations HRA Screening_6_20130219 5.2 Strategically Operating Impacts 23 5.3 Dark-bellied Brent Goose and Waders 24 5.4 Sites Proposed for Allocation 25 6 Screening Statement and
    [Show full text]
  • 9C: New Forest Waterside
    9C: NEW FOREST WATERSIDE Dibden Bay and West Cliff, with backdrop of Southampton water and skyline of the container port and city. Small fields with thick hedges and Remnant mature trees with origins View north from Hythe Pier to Itchen wooded boundaries – West of Hythe from wooded common of Langdown, bridge – extensive shoreline later emparkment and recent modern development – © Ben Stevenson. housing development Waterside cranes and high voltageFawley refinery across Southampton Large scale mid to late 20th C power lines loom over woodedWater – © Trevor Carpenter. development - Totton overlooking horizons – nr. Marchwood Southampton Water. Hampshire County 1 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment New Forest Waterside Hampshire County 2 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment New Forest Waterside 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 The eastern boundary follows the mean low water mark (spring tides). The area includes Totton, the highly developed and wooded coastal plain, and rising land and terrace at about 30 -40m AOD. However, it excludes the higher, more undulating landscape further inland where Southampton Water is no longer perceived as a coastal estuary. To the south the character area is defined by the transition to a coastal landscape more visually connected with the Solent than the estuary. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Coastline and Shore, Significant sized settlement , Coastal Plain Enclosed 1.3 Composition of Borough/District LCAs: New Forest DC: Waterside Parishes (predominantly) Fawley Refinery Complex This character area closely follows the NFDC assessment Waterside Parishes boundary. 1.4 Associations with NCA and Natural Areas: NCA 131: New Forest NA 77: New Forest 1.5 Townscape assessment areas: Totton, Hythe 2.0 Key Characteristics • Marine alluvium soils over gravel coastal plain, rising inland to more sandy soils on river terrace, includes large reclaim areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Catchment Mapping for Natura 2000 Diffuse Water Pollution Plans
    Improvement Programme for England’s Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) – Planning for the Future IPENS067 Surface water catchment mapping for Natura 2000 Diffuse Water Pollution Plans Covers multiple Natura 2000 sites within England First published 05 April 2016 www.gov.uk/government/publications/improvement-programme-for- englands-natura-2000-sites-ipens This project is part of the IPENS programme (LIFE11NAT/UK/000384IPENS) which is financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. Foreword The Improvement Programme for England’s Natura 2000 sites (IPENS), supported by European Union LIFE+ funding, is a new strategic approach to managing England’s Natura 2000 sites. It is enabling Natural England, the Environment Agency, and other key partners to plan what, how, where and when they will target their efforts on Natura 2000 sites and areas surrounding them. As part of the IPENS programme, we are identifying gaps in our knowledge and, where possible, addressing these through a range of evidence projects. The project findings are being used to help develop our Theme Plans and Site Improvement Plans. This report is one of the evidence project studies we commissioned. Diffuse Water Pollution (DWP) is a significant contributor to the unfavourable condition of a large number of water dependent Natura 2000 sites. DWP plans have been identified to provide a catchment-based approach to target and deliver reductions in DWP at impacted Natura 2000 sites. Accurate surface water catchment information is required for sites where DWP is an issue in order to understand the potential catchment area contributing diffuse pollution to the site. This project looked to identify the contributing surface water catchment boundaries for 50 individual Natura 2000 sites throughout England.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Welborne Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Welborne Plan Appropriate Assessment Report Client: Fareham Borough Council Report No.: UE-0115 Welborne AA_7_140128 Version: 7 Status: Final Date: January 2014 Author: NP Checked: SP Approved: NP HRA for the Welborne Plan: Appropriate Assessment January 2014 UE-0115 Welborne AA_7_140128 Contents Executive Summary i E1 Introduction i E2 Findings of the Screening Stage i E3 Conclusions of the Appropriate Assessment ii E4 Recommendations iii E5 Next Steps iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this Report 1 1.2 The Welborne Plan 1 1.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment 2 1.4 Structure of this Document 2 1.5 Relationship to other Documents 2 2 Methodology 5 2.1 Guidance and Best Practice 5 2.2 Methodology 6 2.3 Screening 6 2.4 Appropriate Assessment 8 2.5 In Combination Effects 9 3 European Sites 11 3.1 Scope of the Assessment 11 3.2 Special Areas of Conservation 13 3.3 Special Protection Areas 18 3.4 Ramsar Sites 22 3.5 Conservation Objectives for SAC and SPA 25 3.6 Conservation Objectives for Ramsar Sites 25 3.7 Condition Status 25 4 European Site Characterisation 27 4.1 SPA Bird Populations and Ecology 27 HRA for the Welborne Plan: Appropriate Assessment January 2014 UE-0115 Welborne AA_7_140128 4.2 Qualifying Species of Special Areas of Conservation 54 4.3 Qualifying Habitats of Special Areas of Conservation 57 5 Identifying Impact Pathways 67 5.1 Introduction 67 5.2 Atmospheric Pollution 67 5.3 Disturbance 79 5.4 Effects on Supporting Habitats 94 5.5 Water Abstraction and Supply 96 5.6 Waste Water Treatment
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Designations Crab Tree Bog
    CONSERVATION IN THE NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK 1 Conservation designations Crab Tree Bog Introduction Site The New Forest National Park is one of the most important sites for nature conservation in lowland England. Land within it is owned by the Crown and protection in a large number of private landowners, local authorities and private trusts. the UK This complex ownership and the many aspects of the environment that require conserving, make legal protection desirable. One of the ways that this is done is through the designation The National Parks of protected areas. This factsheet examines the many designations, international, national and Access to the and local, which aim to protect the wildlife and landscape of the New Forest National Park. Countryside Act of 1949 has been central National Park status to the protection of The New Forest became a National Park the British countryside in March 2005 and this put it in the for almost 50 years. It premier league of wildlife conservation and allows national parks protection. As with all national parks there to be designated and are two core purposes that underpin all includes measures to that takes place within the Park. The first protect other parts of is to look after (or conserve) the natural Bog Pimpernel, Hatchet Pond the countryside. beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the Park. The second purpose encourages the New Forest Acts The Act established understanding and enjoyment of its special The New Forest has several Acts of powers to designate Local qualities. On top of this the Environment Parliament which relate specifically to and National Nature Act, 1995 introduced a duty to foster its protection from development and Reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Torness Britain's Acid Exports
    61 Testing Torness p3 Britain's Acid Exports CONTENTS COMMENT Testing Torness 3 At the time of writing, Edinburgh is in the PETE ROCHE gives o round-up of recent middle of the Internat ional Festival •. This events a t our own local nuke. News 4-8 always brings anti-nuclear visitors from groups Chernobyl ond the Media. 9 all over the world, on holiday but not above THOM DIBDIN report$ from the Ecovision a visit to SCRAM to tell of a demonstration '87 Conference. at Wackersdorf (8-10 Oct }, or to discuss views As Safe os Houses? 1·1 PATRICK GREEN discusses the Government's on privatisation. We've also been visited by half-heorted a ttempts to solve the roovn the Greenpeoce boat, Moby Dick, on it s way gos problem. up to Dounreay to collect some samples for Trumpets & Raspbe rries 12-13 radiat ion monitoring. As usual t here is a spate STEYE MARTIN compares the triumphant Dounreay Inquiry Report with the gloomy of anti-nuclear ploys; t heatre groups wanting truth of some UKAEA leaked documents. discounts on their photocopying and demanding The Sleeping Beasts of Wl ndscole 14-15 attendance at their latest product ion which is JOHN LARGE ond PAUL DRAPER explain going to change the world. the problems which led to the notorious 1957 Wlndscale Fire. We always remind visitors that this wlll Breeder Bombs Out 16-17 be the last nuclear- free Festival in these part s MYCLE SCHNEIDER assesses the future if Torness starts up according to the SSEB's of the fast reactor fuel cycle ond latest amended schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • He Chairman of British Aluminium Blamed the Closure Squarely On
    - he Chairman of British Aluminium yest ~rday blamed the closure squarely on high power costs . ....... Contents -------Comment______ _ lnvergordon and Nukes 3 News 4-5 Waste Dumping - final? 6 Energy Politics Namibia and RTZ 7 PWR's and Sizewell 8-9 The closure of the aluminium smelter at lnvergordon shows that economics Consumer Campaign 10 and energy policy are Intimately linked. The energy policy of the current Govern­ ment Is based on the economics of unemployment. An energy policy which is Insulation Programme 11 inflationary can only lead to increased hardship for low Income groups. Appropriate Tech- 12-13 This Issue of the Energy ISulletin Is all about the· worst effects of such a policy, nology which spreads to the Third World, creating a poverty trap In places like Namibia [see page 7]. Reviews 14 The intransigent policies of this Government blunder onward, with the pro­ SCRAM 15 posed Pressurised Water Reactor at Slzewell in East Anglia raising Its ugly head Little Black Rabbit 16 [see pages 8 & 9]. And yet a coherent and humane energy strategy Is staring us Copy date for next issue: in _the face. An energy conservation programme, If Initiated, would Immediately Friday, February 26th, 1982. create thousands of Jo~s, save our oil reserves and eliminate the need for expen­ sive and dangerous nuclear power stations; and give us the breathing space to HELP! develop an alternative energy strategy [see page 11]. The weather hasn't smiled on the Smi­ The Combined H.eat and Power feasibility study of Atklns and Partners is ex­ ling Sun Shop.
    [Show full text]
  • (DWMP) New Forest Catchment
    Drainage and Wastewater Management Plan (DWMP) New Forest Catchment 1 Drainage and Wastewater Management Plans New Forest Catchment - DRAFT Strategic Context for the New Forest DWMP The Environment Agency has previously defined the River Basin District catchments in their River Basin Management Plans prepared in response to the European Union’s Water Framework Directive. These river basin catchments are based on the natural configuration of bodies of water (rivers, estuaries, lakes etc.) within a geographical area, and relate to the natural watershed of the main rivers. We are using the same catchment boundaries for our Level 2 DWMPs. A map of the New Forest river basin catchment is shown in figure 1. Figure 1: The New Forest river basin catchment in Hampshire LONDON ENGLISH CHANNEL Based upon the Ordnance Survey map by Southern Water Services Ltd by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Crown copyright Southern Water Services Limited 1000019426 2 Drainage and Wastewater Management Plans New Forest Catchment - DRAFT Overview of the New Forest catchment The New Forest catchment in Hampshire covers a geographical area of around 300 km2, the majority of which is forested common land located within the New Forest National Park boundary. The catchment is essentially rural but there is significant industrial development located to the east, along Southampton Water. The catchment includes a number of small towns including New Milton, Lyndhurst, Brockenhurst, and Lymington, and four sizeable villages: Ashurst, Brockenhurst, Lyndhurst, and Sway. Outside of The Forest are clusters of larger urban areas including Totton, Marchwood, Dibden, Hythe and Fawley to the east, and New Milton, Milford on Sea, and Lymington to the south-west.
    [Show full text]