DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish Family Tree Benjamin Walther Undergraduate Lesson Plan 4/25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish Family Tree Benjamin Walther Undergraduate Lesson Plan 4/25 Fish Family Tree Benjamin Walther Undergraduate Lesson Plan 4/25/06 This lesson plan is designed to convey the central concepts behind constructing phylogenetic trees using primitive and derived fishes as examples. This lesson was conceived as an activity to engage students during a laboratory session that might accompany a lecture course that has described basic fish anatomy and some background biology of fishes, and thus much of the specific physiological vocabulary has already been introduced. The lesson is geared to either a highschool or introductory undergraduate class level. Central Concept: Phylogenies graphically represent how groups of organisms are related to each other. Phylogenies can be constructed by comparing anatomical structures to determine whether groups are closely related. ONLY shared derived characters (synapomorphies) can be used to create a phylogeny. Vocabulary: Phylogeny (true evolutionary relationship among groups of organisms) Synapomorphy (shared derived character) Homoplasy (non-homologous similarity, due to convergence or reversal) Invitation “Today we’re going to play a game to figure out how a bunch of fish are related to one another. Everyone in this room is now (*shazam*) a different fish species, and you’re all each other’s relatives. Your job is to figure out how you’re related and to create a family tree.” Each student will be given a card with a picture and some information about “themselves” as a fish. Before the cards are distributed, students are instructed to look at their cards, study the picture and the information for a couple minutes and come up with a name for their fish. The names should be as creative and memorable as possible. The cards will not have the real names on them, and students are told that even if they know the actual name of the species they should try and come up with their own creative name. After the students quietly study their cards for a couple of minutes on their own, the teacher brings their attention back as a group. Now they are told that they are going to one by one come up front and tell the entire class about themselves. They should share the information that is on the card and something else that they notice about their fish based on the picture. They should also tell us their name. Before this starts, the teacher tells all the students that everyone in this room should pay close attention to everyone’s characteristics, because later they’ll have to go and pick the other fish that they think is most closely related to them. And everyone here has a partner, so be on the lookout. Then students come up and describe themselves. The teacher will ask them what their name is and write the name on a “Hello, my name is…” name tag. When the student is done, they put the nametag on their shirt and sit down. Once all the introductions are made, the teacher invites everyone to stand up and go find the partner that they think is most related to them. They are told to do their best even if they’re not sure. Depending on teacher discretion, groups of more than two can be formed (although ideally groups of just two are discovered). Once everyone has found their partner, the teacher writes down all of the parings/groups (using their fish names) on the board. Everyone is then asked to sit back down. This will be followed by a very short debrief. Each group will be asked what characters they used to decide that they were related to one another. That character will be written on the board as well. Students will also be asked what characters were not useful in deciding relationships. Time permitting, a couple groups will be asked what other pairs of fish they think are most related to their group, and what characters make them think that. Exploration/Concept Introduction Students are now told that they are going to build a formal family tree using the characters they learned about each other. To do this they will use a character chart. This chart will be put up on the board, and consists of a table with pre-selected characters and all of the species. The teacher will write the creative names on the board (they will be numbered and keyed to the real names that the teacher has on a sheet hidden away somewhere). Each student will then come up and put an X in their column for each character that their fish HAS, and leave blank those characters that their fish does not have. Note: Some fish will have traits that are secondarily lost (for instance, both perciformes have secondarily lost an adipose fin). Each student’s card will note whether the absence of a character is due to a secondary loss or not. If it is secondarily lost, that species will go ahead and mark an X in the box for that trait. Later, this will be used to discuss homoplasies. After the chart has been filled in, the teacher will tally up the X’s for each column. The teacher will then lead a group discussion about how to draw the relationships on the board. At this point vocabulary will be introduced. Synapomorphies will be discussed, as will homoplasies. The secondarily lost characters will be identified as homoplasies. The teacher may ask what would have happened if they had not X’d the boxes for the secondarily lost characters (i.e. it would have confused the relationships between the species). Application The class will then draw the tree together. The teacher will guide the discussion to show that the columns with fewer X’s are more basal while the more X’s indicate derived species. Species with the same number of X’s are pairs. Once the tree is drawn, the students are guided to mark the emergence of characters on the tree. This can be used to further decide what’s a synapomorphy and what is not. Finally, the teacher will put up a real tree showing the relationships among the fish (with their real names) and see if the tree the class discovered is similar or not. If not, discuss what might have been the problem and what they would have liked to have known to help resolve the differences. This certainly would be a good time to discuss how difficult it is to build trees in the real world, and how many different characters (and genetics) is often needed. Also, the trees we create are guesses, estimates at the “true” trees. DIAGRAMS & HANDOUTS FISH INFO CARDS 1.) Hagfish • Jawless • Notochord but no true vertebral column • Cartilaginous skeleton • Extremely slimy • Can tie selves in knots • Lack a true stomach • No scales, no true fins (including adipose), no eyes 2.) Lamprey • Jawless • Notochord but no true vertebral column • No scales, no true fins, no eyes • Cartilaginous skeleton • Teeth on tongue • Parasitic or scavengers 3.) Great White Shark • Jaws • Backbone w/notochord & cartilaginous skeleton • Placoid scales • Cartilage rods in fins, not true fin rays • No adipose fin • Teeth derived from scales • Have excellent nighttime vision 4.) Sting Ray • Jaws • Backbone w/notochord & cartilaginous skeleton • Placoid scales • Cartilage rods in fins, not true fin rays • No adipose fin • Swim by flapping pectoral “wings” • Have serrated venomous spines 5.) Coelacanth • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Special lobed fins, no true fin rays • Jaws • Cosmoid scales • No adipose fin • Elecroreception organ for prey detection • Bodies excrete oil and mucus 6.) Lungfish • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Special lobed fins, no true fin rays • Jaws • Cosmoid scales • No adipose fin • Can breathe air with modified swim bladder • Survives in mud/mucus cocoon when water dries up 7.) Shad • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Jaws • Rayed fins but no adipose fin • Otophysic connection between ear and gas bladder for good hearing • Can hear best at frequency of dolphin whistles • Special modified jaw joint • Cycloid scales 8.) Herring • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Jaws • Rayed fins but no adipose fin • Cycloid scales • Otophysic connection between ear and gas bladder for good hearing • Special modified jaw joint • May communicate by releasing bubble “flatulence” 9.) Catfish • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Jaws • Rayed fins and adipose fin • No scales (cycloid scales secondarily lost) • Gas bladder connected to ears by Weberian apparatus • Release a fright substance in water when injured to alert others (Schreckstoff) • Use highly sensitive barbells to feel around 10.) Minnow • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Jaws • Rayed fins and adipose fin • Cycloid scales • Gas bladder connected to ears by Weberian apparatus • Release a fright substance in water when injured to alert others (Schreckstoff) • Have protrusible jaws to suck in prey 11.) Sea Bass • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Jaws • Rayed fins, adipose fin secondarily lost • Ctenoid scales • Change sex from female to male • Make weak grunting sounds • True fin spines (unsegmented) 12.) Butterfly fish • Bony skeleton & backbone w/notochord • Jaws • Rayed fins, adipose fin secondarily lost • Ctenoid scales • Pointy mouths allow prey to be picked from crevices • False eye spots • True fin spines (unsegmented) CHARACTER CHART Hagfish Lamprey SharkRay CoelacanthLungfish Shad Herring Catfish Minnow Sea Butterfly Bass Fish Notochord X X X X X X X X X X X X Jaws X X X X X X X X X X Bony X X X X X X X X skeleton Rayed X X X X X X fins Adipose X X X X fin Ctenoid X X scales TOTAL 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index INDEX Note: page numbers in italics refer to fi gures, those in bold refer to tables and boxes. abducens nerve 55 activity cycles 499–522 inhibition 485 absorption effi ciency 72 annual patterns 515, 516, 517–22 interactions 485–6 abyssal zone 393 circadian rhythms 505 prey 445 Acanthaster planci (Crown-of-Thorns Starfi sh) diel patterns 499, 500, 501–2, 503–4, reduction 484 579 504–7 aggressive mimicry 428, 432–3 Acanthocybium (Wahoo) 15 light-induced 499, 500, 501–2, 503–4, aggressive resemblance 425–6 Acanthodii 178, 179 505 aglomerular 52 Acanthomorpha 284–8, 289 lunar patterns 507–9 agnathans Acanthopterygii 291–325 seasonal 509–15 gills 59, 60 Atherinomorpha 293–6 semilunar patterns 507–9 osmoregulation 101, 102 characteristics 291–2 supra-annual patterns 515, 516, 517–22 phylogeny 202 distribution 349, 350 tidal patterns 506–7 ventilation 59, 60 jaws 291 see also migration see also hagfi shes; lampreys Mugilomorpha 292–3, 294 adaptive response 106 agnathous fi shes see jawless fi shes pelagic 405 adaptive zones 534 agonistic interactions 83–4, 485–8 Percomorpha 296–325 adenohypophysis 91, 92 chemically mediated 484 pharyngeal jaws 291 adenosine triphosphate (ATP) 57 sound production 461–2 phylogeny 292, 293, 294 adipose fi n 35 visual 479 spines 449, 450 adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 92 agricultural chemicals 605 Acanthothoraciformes 177 adrianichthyids 295 air breathing 60, 61–2, 62–4 acanthurids 318–19 adult fi shes 153, 154, 155–7 ammonia production 64, 100–1 Acanthuroidei 12, 318–19 death 156–7 amphibious 60 Acanthurus bahianus
    [Show full text]
  • CONDITIONED ALARM BEHAVIOR in FATHEAD MINNOWS (Pimephales Promelas) RESULTING from ASSOCIATION of CHEMICAL ALARM PHEROMONE with a NONBIOLOGICAL VISUAL STIMULUS
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 12, 1999 CONDITIONED ALARM BEHAVIOR IN FATHEAD MINNOWS (Pimephales promelas) RESULTING FROM ASSOCIATION OF CHEMICAL ALARM PHEROMONE WITH A NONBIOLOGICAL VISUAL STIMULUS WARREN K. YUNKER, DAN E. WEIN, and BRIAN D. WISENDEN* Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9 (Received April 20, 1998; accepted July 31, 1999) Abstract—Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) adopt antipredator (alarm) behavior when they detect alarm pheromone released from an injured conspecific. This is an adaptive response since alarm pheromone is generally released only in the context of a predation event. Alarm reactions may also occur in response to chemical and visual stimuli that minnows learn to associate with release of alarm pheromone. Here, we tested if fathead minnows can learn to associate a nonbiological, visual stimulus with predation risk. Minnows were simultaneously exposed to red light and conspecific alarm pheromone, inducing an alarm reaction. When retested using red light alone, small shoals of minnows displayed an antipredator response: dashing movements and disorganized swimming followed by decreased height in the water column and increased shoal cohesion. This resulted from a single-trial exposure to the combined cues and demonstrates a robust ecological mechanism by which minnows learn to recognize indicators of predation risk that may vary in space and time. However, learning to associate risk with biologically irrelevant stimuli may be an ecological liability. How minnows discern between relevant and irrelevant stimuli in nature is not known. Key Words—Fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, alarm pheromone, Schreckstoff, learned recognition of predation risk, red light. * To whom correspondence should be addressed at Department of Biology, Moorhead State Univer- sity, 1104 7th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Phylogeny of Neotropical Electric Fishes (Gymnotiformes)
    Name /sv04/24236_u11 12/08/04 03:33PM Plate # 0-Composite pg 360 # 1 13 Diversity and Phylogeny of Neotropical Electric Fishes (Gymnotiformes) James S. Albert and William G.R. Crampton 1. Introduction to Gymnotiform Diversity The evolutionary radiations of Neotropical electric fishes (Gymnotiformes) pro- vide unique materials for studies on the evolution of specialized sensory systems and the diversification of animals species in tropical ecosystems (Hopkins and Heiligenberg 1978; Heiligenberg 1980; Heiligenberg and Bastian 1986; Moller 1995a; Crampton 1998a; Stoddard 1999; Albert 2001, 2002). The teleost order Gymnotiformes is a clade of ostariophysan fishes most closely related to cat- fishes (Siluriformes), with which they share the presence of a passive electro- sensory system (Fink and Fink 1981, 1996; Finger 1986). Gymnotiformes also possess a combined electrogenic–electroreceptive system that is employed for both active electrolocation, the detection of nearby objects that distort the self- generated electric field, and also electrocommunication, the signaling of identity or behavioral states and intentions to other fishes (Carr and Maler 1986). Active electroreception allows gymnotiforms to communicate, navigate, forage, and ori- ent themselves relative to the substrate at night and in dark, sediment-laden waters, and contributes to their ecological success in Neotropical aquatic eco- systems (Crampton and Albert 2005). The species-specific electric signals of gymnotiform fishes allow investigations of behavior and ecology that are simply unavailable in other groups. Because these signals are used in both navigation and mate recognition (i.e., prezygotic reproductive isolation) they play central roles in the evolutionary diversification and ecological specialization of species, as well as the accumulation of species into local and regional assem- blages.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Fishes: Précis of What a Fish Knows (Balcombe 2016)
    Balcombe, Jonathan (2016) In praise of fishes: Précis of What a fish knows (Balcombe 2016). Animal Sentience 8(1) DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1112 This article has appeared in the journal Animal Sentience, a peer-reviewed journal on animal cognition and feeling. It has been made open access, free for all, by WellBeing International and deposited in the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Animal Sentience 2016.095: Balcombe on Fishes Know [Editorial Note: Multiple invited reviews of this book will be appearing in upcoming issues of Animal Sentience, together with the author’s Response.] Multiple Book Review: Animal Sentience publishes multiple reviews of selected books whose Précis is published in the journal along with the reviews and the author’s response(s). Most of the multiple book reviews are invited individually by the Editor but freely submitted reviews of the selected books whose Précis has appeared can also be considered for publication: Please write to the editor to request a review copy. Books can also be nominated and reviewers can be proposed by writing to the Editor. Instructions: http://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/guidelines.html In praise of fishes Précis of What a fish knows (Balcombe 2016) Jonathan Balcombe Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy The Humane Society of the United States Abstract: Our relationship to fishes in the modern era is deeply problematic. We kill and consume more of them than any other group of vertebrates. At the same time, advances in our knowledge of fishes and their capabilities are gaining speed.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Electroreception and Electrogenesis
    2022_C012.fm Page 431 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 4:03 PM Electroreception and 12 Electrogenesis James S. Albert and William G.R. Crampton CONTENTS I. Introduction to Electroreception and Electrogenesis ........................................................432 II. Phylogeny of Electroreception and Electrogenesis...........................................................433 III. Passive Electroreception ....................................................................................................437 A. Electroreception and Mechanoreception: Vertebrate Laterosensory Systems..........438 B. Electroreception in Lampreys....................................................................................438 C. Electroreception in Gnathostomes.............................................................................439 1. Electroreception in Chondrichthyans ..................................................................439 2. Passive Electroreception in Electric Skates and Rays ........................................440 3. Nonteleost Bony Fishes.......................................................................................441 D. Electroreception in Teleosts ......................................................................................441 1. Passive Electroreception in Weakly Electrogenic Siluriformes..........................442 2. Transition from Electric Communication to Active Electroreception................442 IV. Active Electroreception......................................................................................................443
    [Show full text]
  • Epidermal 'Alarm Substance'
    Proc. R. Soc. B doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0709 Published online Epidermal ‘alarm substance’ cells of fishes maintained by non-alarm functions: possible defence against pathogens, parasites and UVB radiation Douglas P. Chivers1,*, Brian D. Wisenden2, Carrie J. Hindman1, Tracy A. Michalak1, Robin C. Kusch1, Susan G. W.Kaminskyj1, Kristin L. Jack1, Maud C. O. Ferrari1, Robyn J. Pollock1, Colin F. Halbgewachs1, Michael S. Pollock1, Shireen Alemadi2, Clayton T. James3, Rachel K. Savaloja2, Cameron P.Goater3, Amber Corwin2, Reehan S. Mirza4, Joseph M. Kiesecker5, Grant E. Brown6, James C. Adrian Jr7, Patrick H. Krone8, Andrew R. Blaustein9 and Alicia Mathis10 1Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5E2 2Department of Biosciences, Minnesota State University Moorhead, Moorhead, MN 56563, USA 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1K 3M4 4Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-5301, USA 5The Nature Conservancy, Wyoming Field Office, 258 Main Street, Suite 200, Lander, WY 82520, USA 6Department of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4B 1R6 7Department of Chemistry, Union College, 807 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12308-3107, USA 8Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5E5 9Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA 10Department of Biology, Missouri State University, 901 South National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65897, USA Many fishes possess specialized epidermal cells that are ruptured by the teeth of predators, thus reliably indicating the presence of an actively foraging predator. Understanding the evolution of these cells has intrigued evolutionary ecologists because the release of these alarm chemicals is not voluntary.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Intelligence, Sentience and Ethics
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 1-2015 Fish Intelligence, Sentience and Ethics Culum Brown Macquarie University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_asie Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Comparative Psychology Commons, and the Other Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brown, C. (2015). Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics. Animal cognition, 18(1), 1-17. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fish Intelligence, Sentience and Ethics Culum Brown Macquarie University KEYWORDS fish cognition, sentience, welfare, pain, intelligence, ethics ABSTRACT Fish are one of the most highly utilised vertebrate taxa by humans; they are harvested from wild stocks as part of global fishing industries, grown under intensive aquaculture conditions, are the most common pet and are widely used for scientific research. But fish are seldom afforded the same level of compassion or welfare as warm-blooded vertebrates. Part of the problem is the large gap between people’s perception of fish intelligence and the scientific reality. This is an important issue because public perception guides government policy. The perception of an animal’s intelligence often drives our decision whether or not to include them in our moral circle. From a welfare perspective, most researchers would suggest that if an animal is sentient, then it can most likely suffer and should therefore be offered some form of formal protection. There has been a debate about fish welfare for decades which centres on the question of whether they are sentient or conscious.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator Recognition and Anti-Predator Behavior in Juvenile Asian Carp
    PREDATOR RECOGNITION AND ANTI-PREDATOR BEHAVIOR IN JUVENILE ASIAN CARP BY JARED CLAYTON WILSON THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Adjunct Professor David H. Wahl, Director of Research Assistant Professor Eric R. Larson Adjunct Assistant Professor Andrew F. Casper ABSTRACT Predation is a determining factor influencing the strength and success of a year class in many prey fishes. Chemical, social, and similar predator cues may all inform an individual of a possible impending predatory threat. Bighead (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) widespread invasive fishes, and can be vulnerable to predation during their first year. Because they now overlap the niches of many native prey species, they may shoal with these species and learn about predation while doing so. Additionally, generalizing predators that have similar characteristics (e.g. odors or body morphometry) may increase the survival of an individual. The objective of this study was to evaluate how juvenile bighead and silver carp respond to threatening situations, as well as how adaptive and plastic are these responses. To achieve these objectives, I performed three separate studies that aimed to define the alarm response of these fishes, assess how group composition may influence the alarm response, and determine if the response could be generalized when exposed to taxonomically similar predators. Bighead and silver carp responded to conspecific alarm cues and both species reduced their activity, however bighead carp did so in much tighter schools than silver carp.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts Honoring Gloria Arratia
    Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts Honoring Gloria Arratia Joseph S. Nelson, Hans-Peter Schultze & Mark V. H. Wilson (editors) TELEOSTEOMORPHA TELEOSTEI TELEOCEPHALA s. str. Leptolepis Pholidophorus † Lepisosteus Amia †? †? † †Varasichthyidae †Ichthyodectiformes Elopidae More advanced teleosts crown- group apomorphy-based group stem-based group Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil • München Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Gloria Arratia’s contribution to our understanding of lower teleostean phylogeny and classifi cation – Joseph S. Nelson ....................................................................................... 11 The case for pycnodont fi shes as the fossil sister-group of teleosts – J. Ralph Nursall ...................... 37 Phylogeny of teleosts based on mitochondrial genome sequences – Richard E. Broughton ............. 61 Occipito-vertebral fusion in actinopterygians: conjecture, myth and reality. Part 1: Non-teleosts – Ralf Britz and G. David Johnson ................................................................................................................... 77 Occipito-vertebral fusion in actinopterygians: conjecture, myth and reality. Part 2: Teleosts – G. David Johnson and Ralf Britz ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Alarm Signaling by Reticulate Sculpins, Cottus Perplexus
    Environmental Biology of Fishes 57: 347–352, 2000. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Chemical alarm signaling by reticulate sculpins, Cottus perplexus Douglas P. Chiversa,b, Matthew H. Puttlitza & Andrew R. Blausteinc aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maine, 5751 Murray Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5751, U.S.A. bPresent address: Department of Biology, 112 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N 5E2, Canada (e-mail: [email protected]) cDepartment of Zoology, Oregon State University, 3029 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-2914, U.S.A. Received 6 January 1999 Accepted 23 July 1999 Key words: alarm signals, Schreckstoff, chemical cues, anti-predator behavior Synopsis The distribution and extent of chemical alarm signaling systems among some families of fishes, including the Cottidae, remains unclear. In laboratory experiments, we tested whether reticulate sculpins, Cottus perplexus, respond to chemical alarm signals released by injured conspecifics. Sculpins decreased movement following expo- sure to skin extracts from conspecifics, but did not respond to cues of syntopic speckled dace, Rhinichthyes osculus, or allotopic swordtails, Xiphophorous helleri. Additional tests demonstrated that the responses of sculpins to alarm cues were dependent on the hunger level of the test fish. Sculpins deprived of food for 2 days failed to respond to conspecific alarm cues, however, the same individuals fed to satiation did respond to alarm cues. Introduction be common in other groups of fishes, including sticklebacks (Mathis & Smith 1993b, Chivers & Smith A wide diversity of fishes have been found to release 1994, Brown & Godin 1997), gobies (Smith 1989, chemical alarm signals upon detecting or being cap- Smith & Lawrence 1992), darters (Smith 1979, Smith tured by a predator (reviews by Smith 1992, Chivers & 1982), poecilids (Garc´ıa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teleost Taar Family of Olfactory Receptors
    The teleost taar family of olfactory receptors: From rapidly evolving receptor genes to ligand-induced behavior Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln vorgelegt von Ashiq Hussain aus Jampur, Pakistan Köln 2010 1 Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Sigrun I. Korsching Prof. Dr. Jens C. Brüning Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 23 November, 2010 2 ERKLÄRUNG Ich versichere, dass ich die von mir vorgelegte Dissertation selbstständig angefertigt, die benutzten Quellen und Hilfsmittel vollständig angegeben und die Stellen in der Arbeit - einschließlich Tabellen, Karten und Abbildungen -, die anderen Werken im Wortlaut oder dem Sinn nach entnommen sind, in jedem Einzelfall als Entlehnung kenntlich gemacht habe; dass diese Dissertation noch keiner anderen Fakultät oder Universität zur Prüfung vorgelegen hat; dass sie - abgesehen von den unten angegebenen Teilpublikationen – noch nicht veröffentlicht worden ist, sowie dass ich eine solche Veröffentlichung vor Abschluss des Promotionsverfahrens nicht vornehmen werde. Die Bestimmungen dieser Promotionsordnung sind mir bekannt. Die von mir vorgelegte Dissertation ist von Prof. Dr. Sigrun. I. Korsching betreut worden. Köln, den 04. Nov, 2010 Teilpublikationen: Hussain, A., Saraiva, L.R., Korsching, S.I. (2009)c Positive Darwinian selection and the birth of an olfactory receptor clade in teleosts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106(11):4313- 4318 Faculty of 1000 Biology: evaluations for Hussain A et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Mar 17,106 (11):4313-8 3 To my parents 4 I. Acknowledgement This study was conducted in the system neurobiology laboratory of Prof. Dr. Sigrun I. Korsching at the Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Germany.
    [Show full text]