Investigations at Tackley Church, Oxfordshire, 1981-4: the Anglo-Saxon and Romanesque Phases
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Investigations at Tackley Church, Oxfordshire, 1981-4: the Anglo-Saxon and Romanesque Phases By JOHN BLAIR and BARRY MCKAy with contributions by RICHARD GE~I , ARTHUR MACGRECOR and I\IARK ROBI"SO:O; SU~IMARY Tacklty church (SP476202) lits Ittar Aktman Strul, on a manor htld in 1066 by Hugolin, Edward tht Conftssor 's chambtrlain, and in 1086 by Hugh, Earl oj Chtsttr; Hugh gaut Iht church to the Norman abbty oj St. Seutr, which held il until afttr JJ 58. II contains Romalttsque ftalum including a blocktd north arcade,- a monolithic Romanesque door-head is re-stt in the churchyard wall. During 1981-4 the standing Jabric was surutytd, and the silt oj tht norlh aislt parlly txcaualtd. Tht laytr undtrlying Iht church was rich in carbonistd grain and produced one mid-Saxon potsherd. Later contexts produced 4 Romano-British and 13 mid-Saxon shtrds. Tht earliest identified structures wert an aisLeltss nave and a subsequent north pOrlicus, probably both pre-Conquest. At this date there was a cemetery on the north side of the nave. In Lhe earry 12th century a north aisle was added, its arcade and clerestory windows piercing the standing naut wall, and lhe north porticus was dtmolishtd; lhis phaSt probably also includtd a matching south aisle, shallow transepts and perhaps a crossing tower. Re-set beak-heads and other archiltelural dttails suggtsllaltr 12th-cenlury additions, probably including tht west half oj lht slanding chanet/. Finds staltd by tht north aislt includt a ont-pitet ivory comb and a possiblt Jragmtnt oj a Itad Juntrary chaliet. Tht possibility that Iht chuTch was once oj minsttr status is discusstd. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We arc most grateful to the Revd. Michael Hayter and the Revd. Michael Holland (successive rectors), and the Parochial Church Council, for permitting the excavation and survey; to Roger Ainslie for his invaluable help during the excavation; to the Tackley Local History Group, especially Gill Grant and Barbara Gribble, and all others who helped on site; to Tim Morgan for drawing Fig. 2; to Nicholas Palmer for drawing the sections; to Rachel Everett for drawing Fig. 7; to Maureen ~1ellor for her advice on the pottel')'; to Richard Gem, Anhur MacGregor and Mark Robinson for their specialist reports; to the County Museum for conserving the finds; to Mark Chamberlain and Brendan Grimley of Bradford University for conducting a resistivity survey before excavation; to A.P. Baggs and the staff of the Victoria History of Oxfordshire for help in analysing the building and for permission to use Fig. I; and to Richard Gem, Warwick Rodwell and Janet Cooper for their comments. 26 JOH" Bl.AIR AND BARRY MCKAY HISTORICAL CONTEXT' Tackley church is sited on the eastern edge of Woollon hundred, 1.5 km. west of the Cherwell and only 500 m. north of Akeman StreC't, the Roman road from Cirenccslcr to St. Albans. It stands some 300 m. from Taekley village, all the houses in which are post-medieval. The field immediately east of the church has produced early medieval pottery and traces of buildings;2 this, together with Anglo-Saxon settlement material from the church site itself (below, p. to-I), suggests a shirt of focus. The Domesday manor (about two-thirds of the later parish)' was near two important royal estates. West and south-west lay the Woodstock/ Wootton complex, frequented by kings from at least iEthelred II's reign .. Eastwards across the Cherwell was Kirtlington, Domesday royal demesne and memioned as a royal vill in 943-7.) It is conceivable thallhe Cherwell became a boundary relatively late, and that Woodstock and Kirtlington are remnants of a much larger royal demesne spanning central Oxfordshire. Even discounting this conjecture, Tackley's location suggests the possibility that it may have split away from the Woodstock/ Wootton group at some date not very long before 1066. The Domesday elllry gives this idea some support. In 1086 Tackle) was held by Hugh, Earl of Chester, and under him b) one Robert, but the 1066 lord had been ' Hugh the chamberlain'.6 This was almost certa inly Hugolin (a Frenchman to judge from his name), Edward the Confessor's chamberlain and one of his most important servants.' Westminster Abbey, where he was buried, remembered him as 'a thegn, the principal chamberlain ofSt. Edward the king, always devoted to God, and among all the magnates of this realm Edward's most loyal knight'. Tackley was the most valuable of Hugolin's recorded manors,' worth £8 p.a. in 1066. It seems very likely that he acquired it from his patron the king, by a grant out of royal demesne. Tackley church and its glebe were separated from the manor shortly before 1086, when Earl Hugh re-founded the abbey ofSt. Sever (Vau-de-Vire, Calvados) and endowed it with the churches and tithes of numerous English manors, Tackley among them.9 The absence of a separate Domesday entry is not surprising, for the Oxfordshire circuit rarely recorded churches. St. Sever was still holding the church in 1158, but by 1200 it had reverted to the manor:O In the later middle ages 'the living, comprising tithe and glebe (2 yardlands in 1634), was one of the richest in the deanery and was valued at £12 a year gross in 1254, at £16 in 1291 , and at £19 95. 4ld. in 1535'." For unrcfcrcncro statements in this section and further information, sec rC.1I Oxnn, xi, 19+-:l08 .J. Bond in D. Hooke (cd.) .Htdin:al IHla.(ts (O.U.C.A. ~tonograph ,), 1985), 121 Akcman Str(>et was the late Anl!;lo-Saxon boundary ixtwC'en T ackley and \'V hitehili: ,",C.II Orono XI. 19·1-6. and abo\"(>, pp 16-17 'Law·codrs of978 X 1008 and ?IOO8 X 1016 ( I and IX Atr.l were issued at WoodslOck. Wootton il~rlfhad Ix-en granted away by King- ~::d ga r in 958 (W dC' G. Birch, Cartularium Saxonicum, iii ( 1893). '-;0.1042), but was roval land a~ain by the time of OomC'sda), Book (1'c.H. Oxon. i, 4(0). ) V.C.H. Oxon. i, 400; The Will of £tJulgiju, eds. O. Whitdock, N, Kerr and Lord Renncll (Roxburghc Club, 1968),40-44. For Kirtlington as a royal viii in 977, sec English Historical Documtnt.J 1, roo D. Whitdock (2nd «In., 19 79), 230. ' V.C.H. Oxon. i, 409. 1 F. Barlow, Edward the ConJwor (1970), 16.>-6; F. Barlow, The English Church 1000-1066 (2nd edn., 1979), 122-4; F.E. Harmer, Anglo-Saxon Writ.J ( 1952), 324, 544, 564 . • The others are Oedworth at £4 ( V.C.H . Btrles. i, 365) and Pillerton Priors at £ I ( V.G.H. Warwicks. i, 308). 1n King Edward's time Hugolin had also bought the ex-minster church of Huntington from two local priests (VC. H. lIunts. i, 354). There seems to have been a Westminster tradition that he gave Deene (Northants.) to the Ab~y (P. H. Sawyer, Anglo-Saxon Charms: an Annotattd List anJ Bibliography ( 1968), No. 1039) . • Cd/. Doa. FranCt, 216; D. Mauhew, TIlt Norman Mon.astuus and their English PosslSsioflS (1962), 12, 53-4. Cal. Docs. Franct, 216: Rot. Cur. Rig. (Ree. Comm.), ii, :lCX); Rotuli Hugonu dt Hillts, ii (Line. Rec Soc. vi, 1913). 4 .. V.C.H Oxon. xi, 205. I:-'VESTIGATIO:-'S AT TACKLEY CHURCH. 1981-4 27 CHANCEL N A V E :TOWER : IIIIJ pre-conquest 12th century •IlIIIIl 13th century ~ 14th century ~ 15th & 16th century [0J 17th century 10 0 60 reet ~=-~====================~ 0 19th century ,,5=====;;O~====~==========,,;;IS metres Fig. I. Tackley parish church as existing, with interpretation of standing phases. (Reproduced with amend ments from V.C.Ii. Oxon. xi, 207.) The excavated area, in the angle between the nave and north transept, is shown stippled. Scale 1:250. THE STANDING FABRIC The architcclUra) development of Tackley church (Fig. )) has been recently and fully discussed in the Victoria Counly History. 12 Features later than the 12th century will therefore only be described here when they are necessary for understanding the early phases. The two clements of Romancsque or earlier date arc the nave, retaining inserted north arcade arches and clerestory windows, and the west half of the chancel, retaining one pilaster-buttress on (he south side. Probably in the early 12th century, when the north aisle was built, the nave was extended westwards by one bay; the thicker walling of this extension distinguishes it both from the original fabric and from later additions. At an unknown date the north aisle was demolished, leaving an abnormally long buttress, like the stub of a truncated wall, extending north from the west end of the nave. The north arcade was blocked, a doorway which probably derives from the outer aisle wall being re-set in the blocking. I n the 13th century the south aisle was rebuilt, the new arcade destroying any older one though leaving the original walling above; at about the same time the chancel was extended eastwards. In the 14th cenLUry the central tower and transepts were rebuilt, with IJ Ibid. 206-7. flO Fig. 2. Nonh wall of na\,(': t:)(tt:mai dcvation. dra .... n b,,' 'J Morgan Scou 1:90. .... - ,,- ~ HOIITH W ....ll SOUTH WAll Fig. 3. North and south walls of nave: internal elevations, showing Rom3llcstlu{' fe3lUft's left exposed after Victorian plastering. Laler fralures are not shown. Sca/t 1:90. 30 JOHN BLAIR MID BARRY ~lCKAY the new tower skilfully aligned to reduce the visual impact of a deflection between nave and chancel. The two blocked arches of the north arcade are visible both externally and internally (Figs.