Pacific Southwest Water Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pacific Southwest Water Plan THE Monday, February 17, 1964 J v°rna l 5A PACIFIC SOUTHWEST WATER PLAN NORTH COAST t STORAGE RESERVOIRS ♦ Mono Lake UTAH / SAN LUIS DAM NEVADA COLO. er. DIXIE PRO' CT PARIA RIVER AN St.iGeorge ¢AM SITE V Ka nab MOAPA VALLEY \ PUMPING PROJECT R alt Lees Fer GLEN CANYON DAM Owens Lake \ SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER SUP Y PROJECT Age ♦ Las Vega\ eR LOS ANGELES t AQUEDUCT \ ♦ Iii 1 HOOVER BRIDGE C NYON \ ~ DAM DAM SI 'E CALIF e NIA STATE 0 WA PLAN // O OA AQUEDUCT SYSTEM 's • f` 'PG_ DAVIS DAM 0 C A L Flagstaff° ti I F ORNIA CEDAR SPRINGS- HAYFIELD- +' IMP RIAL AOUEDUCT Holbrook CAL RNIA AQUEDUCT ENLARGEMENT W ELER RIDGE-CEDAR SPRINGS y COLORADO RIVER PARKE DAM Los AngeIeS AQUEDUCT NEW MEX. ..................... 0 (M.W.D.) A R I 0 N A Locai Agencies CENTRAL Waste Water C • AR SPR1 HEADGATE ARIZONA PROJECT Renovation P RRI AQUEDUCT ,I[ ROCK DIV. DAM ...,../ AQUEDUCT SYSTEM MAXWELL Salt PALO VERDE DA SITE DIV. DAM SAN DI PHOENIX MAJOR WATER FACILITIES AQUEDU Salton Colorado River Sea Water Salvage HOO R EXISTING R I VER DAM ITE I MPERIAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION ALL-AMERIC G1 1' A San Diego Local Agencies BUTT DAM SITE INITIAL PLAN (IMMEDIATE AUTHORIZATION) CANAL Waste Water INDIAN IRRIGATION PROJECTS MOREL Renovation Safford INITIAL PLAN (FURTHER STUDY REQUIRED) MEXICAN ound-Water Recovery c,. Oir:_R PROGRAMS DIVERSIONS 0 Tucson Lordsburg UNITED STATES POSSIBLE DESALTING SO ES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PACIFIC OCEAN BUREAU OF RECLAMATION GULF OF CALIFORNIA SALTON SEA INITIAL PACIFIC SOUTHWEST WATER PLAN CHARLESTON ¢AM SITE , :, • Nola Les LOCATION MAP Gulf of California JANUARY 19 , 4 Udall Puts Central Arizona Project in Phase One BY ELSON IRWIN tion of the availability of 7.5 million acre- habitat in the Pacific Flyway. Public fishing from the Lower Colorado River. Journal City Editor feet of water for consumptive use from the and hunting opportunities will be expanded This then would supposedly bring an end In the rcceiltly released revised $3.1 billion Lower Colorado River. to meet ever increasing demands. to hostilities that have lasted for the past plan to cope with the water problems of the 5. Assure maximum utilization of existing 10. Provide the climate in which past con- 40 years between Arizona and California. Pacific Southwest, the first phase would create water supplies through water salvage, waste- troversies can be set aside and all who would In addition to the Central Arizona Project a basin power revenue account of $1.7 billion water renovation and related measures. be so vitally affected by the common spectre and Bridge Canyon Dam, its key revenue to construct the Central Arizona Project and 6. Provide for authorization of several ur- of future water shortage can move forward structure of Phase I would include lining of related works. gently needed water and power developments in resolution of the region's water problems the All -American and Coachella canals to save The Pacific Southwest Water Plan was un- th't--have long been delayed. in a united effective approach. 500,000 acre feet of water now lost to seepago, veiled by Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the ?. Enhance the well - being and economic The report further states that the proposed easing immediate impact on California of its Interior Sunday. status of the many American Indians living Initial Plan as the first step of a comprehensive loss of the lawsuits, plus enlargement of the The total construction cost of the Initial in this area. plan will meet only the most immediate California aqueduct to transport more Feather Plan is estimated as $3,126,000,000, of which 8. Provide means for meeting the rapidly and urgent demands for increased water- River water into southern California. 95 percent would be fully reimbursable. expanding needs for water-oriented outdoor supplies for the Pacific Southwest. The cost of each feature would be repaid recreation. The Initial Plan contemplates the conveyance It would also include construction of the within 50 years after it became revenue pro- 9. Provide necessary facilities for the con- of 1.2 million acre-feet of surplus water from Dixie Project to build a dam on the top- ducing. servation and development of fish and wildlife, northern to southern California to guarantee waters of the Virgin River to protect water The report would permit authorization by including urgently needed wintering waterfoul against deficiencies in water supplies available for the St. George area in Utah. Congress to make the CAP an independent project, provided the basin account is incor- CENTRAL ARIZONA NEWSPAPERS INC. porated into the bill, Goldwater, Fannin Rap PUBLISHERS OF THE ARIZONA JOURNAL The Interior Dept. strongly backs a package AND THE ARIZONA JOURNAL WEEKLY NEWS plan with the second phase costing $1.4 billion following in 15 to 20 years. OFFERS TO THE PEOPLE OF ARIZONA Many of the suggestions for the revised Udall's Stand on Water By United Press International nin: "I firmly believe that stand he has in the water dis- 2,400,000 Shares of Common "A" Voting plan were based on ideas advanced by the gov- Interior Secretary Stewart Congress will authorize the pute between Arizona and Cal- ernors of the affected states. The plan will be Udall's revised Pacific South- C. A. P. if given the op- ifornia. He said the regional presented to the Federal Power Commission west Water Program released portunity. All that is needed plan might be good on paper, and but would never work because today. in Washington yesterday has for full consideration is a fa- drawn heated criticism from vorable report by Secretary California never would give According to Interior Dept. officials, the his fellow Arizonans — Gov- Udall. up water from northern rivers 2,200,000 Shares of Common "B" Non-voting Initial Plan will constitute a significant step ernor Paul Fannin and Sena- Sen. Barry Goldwater joined to be sent to other states. tor Barry Goldwater. Fannin in criticism of the Goldwater says the pro- at PAR-VALUE forward in eliminating present water deficien- The first phase of the Udall plan. Speaking in No- posed C.A.P. should be built cies and in providing new water supplies to $3,100,000,000 plan calls gales Saturday night, the Ari- independently of the regional Each unit consisting of: meet growing demands in the Pacific South- for construction of the Cen- zona Senator said he didn't water program, in which the west. tral Arizona Project and Mar- understand how a fellow Ari- project is included as a sec- 12 shares of Common "A" Voting ble Canyon Dam in addition zonan like Udall could take the tion of the first phase. It does not provide an overall solution for to other projects affecting 11 shares of Common "B" Non-voting the region's total future needs. This can only several other states. be accomplished, the report states, through As worded, the report would Price to Public — $25.00 per unit permit authorization by Con- long-range, comprehensive, regional planning. gress of C.A.P. as an in- It will, however, accomplish the following: dependent project, provided Please deliver prospectus and information to: 1. Meet the most immediate and urgent the basin account is incor- porated into the bill. However, water needs of the Pacific Southwest and Interior Department officials NAME .......... provide time in which to work out compre- strongly recommend the pack- hensive solutions to long-range needs. age plan. ADDRESS ........................................................................ Gov. Fannin claims the plan 2. Provide the setting, point the direction is a threat to the C.A.P. He CITY ............................................................................. and create the means whereby comprehensive, says "his concern is with how long-range plans can be developed to make the report may be used to SECRETARY of the Interior Stewart L. PHONE ...................................................................... hinder and delay the authori- Udall (center), presents a copy of his best- and keep the Pacific Southwest water sufficient. zation of the C.A.P., which 3. Establish a development fund that 's Fannin said the plan "pur- seller on conservation, "The Quiet Crisis," This is neither an offer to sell or buy the securities of this company. es- The offer is made only by prospectus to residents of Arizona. sential as the financial foundation of ports to support." to Industry and Commerce Minister Guisep- future Fannin says Udall has re- Pacific Southwest development. pe Medici of Italy during a discussion at the fused to give a separate and CENTRAL ARIZONA NEWSPAPERS INC. 4. Protect the extensive economies that favorable report on the C.A.P. Interior Department of problems mutual to E. Washington Phoenix, Arizona have been developed in the Pacific Southwest bill to Congress, despite the the two countries. Italian Ambassador 2801 pleas of Arizona Congress- Sergio Fenoaltea is at left. (USDI Photo) Phone: 275-6383 and which are dependent upon the continua- men and himself. Said Fan- 1 11 r ME DIM 1111111111 "411111V 1111 11111Pr 4111111, OOP' MI II NM I'961 'LT ,fiznagad 'AEpuoyk inuoinurIV 3 H YNOZ V9 .
Recommended publications
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Across the Western Landscape: Priority Issues and Strategies for Western Forests
    Across the Western Landscape: Priority Issues and Strategies for Western Forests EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The forests of the West contain an incredible assemblage of resources. They cover approximately 365 million acres, 49 percent of the nation’s total forested area, and are managed by a diverse set of owners. Threats facing western forests affect all lands and all people, compromising the basic assets we need and often take for granted such as: clean air, abundant water, safe communities, open spaces, and economic opportunities. Cooperation and coordination across jurisdictional boundaries are needed to address these threats. The Western Forestry Leadership Coalition (WFLC) represents a unique partnership between state and federal government forestry leaders and supports a collaborative approach to sustainable forest management. All U.S. states and Affiliated Islands have completed assessments of their forest resources and developed strategies for the conservation, protection, About the Western Forestry and enhancement of those resources. These Statewide Forest Resource Leadership Coalition Assessments and Strategies (Forest Action Plans) provide a long-term roadmap The Western Forestry Leadership for forest restoration and management. Across the Western Landscape: Priority Coalition (WFLC) is a State and Issues and Strategies for Western Forests is a 23-page publication providing the Federal government partnership. highlights from a synthesis of the western states’ and Pacific Islands’ Forest The members of the coalition Action Plans. These highlights — summarized here — include priority issues, include: the 23 State and Pacific strategies to address them, and a Six-Point Plan for the future. Island Foresters of the West and the 7 western Regional Foresters, Wildland Fire and the Wildland-Urban Interface: reduce 3 western Research Station Directors, wildfire risk to communities and mitigate wildfire impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Progress Report 2002: Pacific Southwest Region
    EPA Progress Report 2002 Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Pacific Southwest / Region 9 EPA–909–R–02–001 Dear Readers, Growing up in Southern California, I learned early in life about the human cost of an unhealthy environment. The brown cloud that covered the Los Angeles Basin for too many days each summer affected everyone who worked and played there. But over the years I’ve also watched the skies grow clearer and smog alerts become a thing of the past. In 2001, the Los Angeles area met national health standards nine out of every ten days — the cleanest year since smog measurements began over 40 years ago. While there is much more work to be done, we’ve come a long way. I am honored to introduce this EPA Progress Report, the first that we have issued since I joined EPA as Regional Administrator in October 2001. The past year’s accomplishments are full of promise for meeting the public health and environmental chal­ lenges we face in the Pacific Southwest, and I am eager to to continue our progress in this important mission. EPA’s Pacific Southwest Region is truly diverse, encompassing the states of Arizona, California, Hawaii and Nevada; 147 tribal nations and communities; and Pacific islands such as American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The problems we confront here are complex, interconnected, and resistant to traditional solutions. As we move to meet these challenges, we are fortunate both in our own strengths and in the capacity and will of our partners — the states, tribes, industry and the environmental advocacy communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary U.S
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Base Flow of the Colorado River: Its Importance in Sustaining Perennial Flow in Northern Arizona And
    1 * This paper is under review for publication in Hydrogeology Journal as well as a chapter in my soon to be published 2 master’s thesis. 3 4 Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and 5 southern Utah 6 7 Riley K. Swanson1* 8 Abraham E. Springer1 9 David K. Kreamer2 10 Benjamin W. Tobin3 11 Denielle M. Perry1 12 13 1. School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, US 14 email: [email protected] 15 2. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, US 16 3. Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, US 17 *corresponding author 18 19 Abstract 20 Water in the Colorado River is known to be a highly over-allocated resource, yet decision makers fail to consider, in 21 their management efforts, one of the most important contributions to the existing water in the river, groundwater. This 22 failure may result from the contrasting results of base flow studies conducted on the amount of streamflow into the 23 Colorado River sourced from groundwater. Some studies rule out the significance of groundwater contribution, while 24 other studies show groundwater contributing the majority flow to the river. This study uses new and extant 1 25 instrumented data (not indirect methods) to quantify the base flow contribution to surface flow and highlight the 26 overlooked, substantial portion of groundwater. Ten remote sub-basins of the Colorado Plateau in southern Utah and 27 northern Arizona were examined in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorado River a NATURAL MENACE BECOMES a NATIONAL RESOURCE ' '
    The Colorado River A NATURAL MENACE BECOMES A NATIONAL RESOURCE ' ' I Comprehensive Report on the Development of ze Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin for rrigation, Power Production, and Other Beneficial Ises in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming By THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J . A . Krug, Secretary SPONSORED BY AND PREPARED UNDER THE GENERAL SUPERVISION OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Michael W. Straus, Commissioner E. A. Morit-, Director, Region 3 ; E. O. Larson, Director, Region 4 MARCH 1 946 1P 'A m 4„ M 1i'leming Library Grand Canyon Colleg P . )x 11097 Contents Page PROPOSED REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE Explorations 46 INTERIOR Settlement 48 Page Population 49 Letter of June 6,1946, from the Acting Commissioner, Chapter III . DIVIDING THE WATER 53 3 Bureau of Reclamation Virgin Conditions 55 REGIONAL DIRECTORS' REPORT Early Development of the River 56 Summary of Conditions in the Early 1920's . 59 Map of Colorado River Basin Facing 9 Between the Upper and Lower Basins 59 Scope and Purpose 9 Between United States and Mexico . 66 Authority for the Report 9 DEVELOPING THE BASIN Cooperation and Acknowledgments 9 Chapter IV. 69 Description of Area 10 Upper Basin 72 Problems of the Basin 11 Labor Force 72 Water Supply 12 Land Ownership and Use 73 Division of Water 13 Soils 73 Future Development of Water Resources 13 Agriculture 73 Table I, Present and Potential Stream Depletions in Minerals and Mining 80 the Colorado River Basin 14 Lumbering 85 Potential Projects 14 Manufacturing 86 Table II, Potential Projects in the Colorado River Transportation and Markets .
    [Show full text]
  • Clear-Water Tributaries of the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona: Stream Ecology and the Potential Impacts of Managed Flow by René E
    Clear-water tributaries of the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona: stream ecology and the potential impacts of managed flow by René E. Henery ABSTRACT Heightened attention to the sediment budget for the Colorado River systerm in Grand Canyon Arizona, and the importance of the turbid tributaries for delivering sediment has resulted in the clear-water tributaries being overlooked by scientists and managers alike. Existing research suggests that clear-water tributaries are remnant ecosystems, offering unique biotic communities and natural flow patterns. These highly productive environments provide important spawning, rearing and foraging habitat for native fishes. Additionally, clear water tributaries provide both fish and birds with refuge from high flows and turbid conditions in the Colorado River. Current flow management in the Grand Canyon including beach building managed floods and daily flow oscillations targeting the trout population and invasive vegetation has created intense disturbance in the Colorado mainstem. This unprecedented level of disturbance in the mainstem has the potential to disrupt tributary ecology and increase pressures on native fishes. Among the most likely and potentially devastating of these pressures is the colonization of tributaries by predatory non-native species. Through focused conservation and management tributaries could play an important role in the protection of the Grand Canyon’s native fishes. INTRODUCTION More than 490 ephemeral and 40 perennial tributaries join the Colorado River in the 425 km stretch between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead. Of the perennial tributaries in the Grand Canyon, only a small number including the Paria River, the Little Colorado River and Kanab Creek drain large watersheds and deliver large quantities of sediment to the Colorado River mainstem (Oberlin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteria in the Grand Canyon
    White-water Researchers Check Bacteria in the Grand Canyon Item Type Article Authors Tunnicliff, Brock; Brickler, Stan; Webster, Guy Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Progressive Agriculture in Arizona Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 27/09/2021 20:42:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/296209 White -water Researchers Check Bacteria in the Grand Canyon Using river rafts equipped as mobile laboratories is the best way to By Dr. Brock Tunnicliff test water quality in the Colorado River of the Grand Canyon. The and Dr. Stan Brickler, School sharply increased number of boat trips through the canyon since the of Renewable Natural 1960s is the main reason that testing the water there has become impor- Resources, and Guy Webster, tant. Agricultural Communications Based on two years of testing, UA School of Renewable Natural Resources researchers have made recommendations for safer use of river water by boaters. Boaters should treat water from the river and its trib- utaries before drinking it. Drinking straight from the river has been common in past seasons. Boaters also should avoid stirring up bottom sediments. The sediments contain much more bacterial contamination than does the surface water. Stirring up sediments, especially in side- stream pools, can raise the fecal bacteria count in water above the stan- dard maximum for body- contact water use. Photograph: Recreational rafts The UA researchers have explained these recommendations to navigate a stretch of the Colorado River in the lower half of the boatmen from 22 licensed commercial outfitters during National Park Grand Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • FISH of the COLORADO RIVER Colorado River and Tributaries Between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead
    FISH OF THE COLORADO RIVER Colorado River and tributaries between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead ON-LINE TRAINING: DRAFT Outline: • Colorado River • Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP) • Native Fishes • Common Non-Native Fishes • Rare Non-Native Fishes • Standardized Sampling Protocol Colorado River: • The Colorado River through Grand Canyon historically hosted one of the most distinct fish assemblages in North America (lowest diversity, highest endemism) • Aquatic habitat was variable ▫ Large spring floods ▫ Cold winter temperatures ▫ Warm summer temperatures ▫ Heavy silt load • Today ▫ Stable flow releases ▫ Cooler temperatures ▫ Predation Overview: • The Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program was established in 1997 to address downstream ecosystem impacts from operation of Glen Canyon Dam and to provide research and monitoring of downstream resources. Area of Interest: from Glen Canyon Dam to Lake Mead Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (Fish) Goals: • Maintain or attain viable populations of existing native fish, eliminate risk of extinction from humpback chub and razorback sucker, and prevent adverse modification to their critical habitat. • Maintain a naturally reproducing population of rainbow trout above the Paria River, to the extent practicable and consistent with the maintenance of viable populations of native fish. Course Purpose: • The purpose of this training course “Fish of the Colorado River” is to provide a general overview of fish located within the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam downstream to Lake Mead and linked directly to the GCDAMP. • Also included are brief explanations of management concerns related to the native fish species, as well as species locations. Native Fishes: Colorado River and tributaries between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead Bluehead Sucker • Scientific name: Catostomus discobolus • Status: Species of Special Concern (conservation status may be at risk) • Description: Streamlined with small scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park
    To Bryce Canyon National Park, KANAB To St. George, Utah To Hurricane, Cedar City, Cedar Breaks National Monument, To Page, Arizona To Kanab, Utah and St. George, Utah V and Zion National Park Gulch E 89 in r ucksk ive R B 3700 ft R M Lake Powell UTAH 1128 m HILDALE UTAH I L ARIZONA S F COLORADO I ARIZONA F O gin I CITY GLEN CANYON ir L N V C NATIONAL 89 E 4750 ft N C 1448 m RECREATION AREA A L Glen Canyon C FREDONIA I I KAIBAB INDIAN P Dam R F a R F ri U S a PAGE RESERVATION H 15 R i ve ALT r 89 S 98 N PIPE SPRING 3116 ft I NATIONAL Grand Canyon National Park 950 m 389 boundary extends to the A MONUMENT mouth of the Paria River Lees Ferry T N PARIA PLATEAU To Las Vegas, Nevada U O Navajo Bridge M MARBLE CANYON r e N v I UINKARET i S G R F R I PLATEAU F I 89 V E R o V M L I L d I C a O r S o N l F o 7921ft C F 2415 m K I ANTELOPE R L CH JACOB LAKE GUL A C VALLEY ALT P N 89 Camping is summer only E L O K A Y N A S N N A O C I O 89T T H A C HOUSE ROCK N E L E N B N VALLEY YO O R AN C A KAIBAB NATIONAL Y P M U N P M U A 89 J L O C FOREST O K K D O a S U N Grand Canyon National Park- n F T Navajo Nation Reservation boundary F a A I b C 67 follows the east rim of the canyon L A R N C C Y r O G e N e N E YO k AN N C A Road to North Rim and all TH C OU Poverty Knoll I services closed in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • TAKE YOUR TIME STAKEHOLDERS GUIDE 2015 Best Ad Campaign WINNER
    TAKE YOUR TIME STAKEHOLDERS GUIDE 2015 Best Ad Campaign WINNER Our award-winning TAKE YOUR TIME ad campaign has brought incredible success to the community. The campaign features TV spots, Bryce Canyon Bryce print ads and PR campaigns all highlighting the value of experiencing CANYONEERING HIKING | MOUNTAIN BIKING | one more day in Garfield County. RED CANYON CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK SLOT CANYONS | BOULDER MOUNTAIN DIXIE NATIONAL FOREST KODACHROME BASIN | SCENIC BYWAY 12 We are now ready to take this campaign to the next level by involving ANASAZI STATE MUSEUM | BryceCanyonCountry.com our local partners and employees through the Take Your Time Initiative. 800.444.6689 This is an internal effort to involve and engage businesses throughout Garfield County. We want everyone in the county to understand how to experience the best of Bryce Canyon Country. The TAKE YOUR TIME Initiative GETTING THE WHOLE COUNTY INVLOVED The TAKE YOUR TIME INITIATIVE will accelerate an already successful campaign to a whole new level through the help and engagement of Garfield County employees. We envision visitors interacting with county employees, discussing different activities around the area, discovering new ideas and adding plans to their itinerary. Maybe they’ll plan another hike, book an extra tour or schedule a scenic drive. No matter what they plan, we want our visitors to start thinking about how they can TAKE THEIR TIME in Garfield County. WELCOME TO GARFIELD COUNTY EXPLORE BRYCE CANYON | SCENIC BYWAY 12 AND 143 | GRAND STAIRCASE | SO MUCH MORE! Mileage From Bryce Canyon GARFIELD COUNTY ACTIVITIES MAP National Park MANY ADVENTURES AWAIT IN GARFIELD COUNTY Anasazi State Park Museum ........
    [Show full text]
  • 2013. “Unique Challenges Facing Southwestern Tribes
    Chapter 17 Unique Challenges Facing Southwestern Tribes COORDINATING LEAD AUTHOR Margaret Hiza Redsteer (U.S. Geological Survey) LEAD AUTHORS Kirk Bemis (Zuni Tribe Water Resources Program), Karletta Chief (University of Arizona), Mahesh Gautam (Desert Research Institute), Beth Rose Middleton (University of California, Davis), Rebecca Tsosie (Arizona State University) REVIEW EDITOR Daniel B. Ferguson (University of Arizona) Executive Summary When considering climate change, risks to Native American lands, people, and cultures are noteworthy. Impacts on Native lands and communities are anticipated to be both early and severe due to their location in marginal environments. Because Native Ameri- can societies are socially, culturally, and politically unique, conventional climate change adaptation planning and related policies could result in unintended consequences or conflicts with Native American governments, or could prove to be inadequate if tribal consultation is not considered. Therefore, it is important to understand the distinct his- torical, legal, and economic contexts of the vulnerability and adaptive capacity of South- western Native American communities. The key messages presented in this chapter are: • Vulnerability of Southwestern tribes is higher than that for most groups because it is closely linked to endangered cultural practices, history, water rights, and Chapter citation: Redsteer, M. H., K. Bemis, K. Chief, M. Gautam, B. R. Middleton, and R. Tsosie. 2013. “Unique Challenges Facing Southwestern Tribes.” In Assessment of Climate Change in the South- west United States: A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment, edited by G. Garfin, A. Jar- dine, R. Merideth, M. Black, and S. LeRoy, 385–404. A report by the Southwest Climate Alliance. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    [Show full text]