Date Printed: 04/22/2009 JTS Box Number

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Date Printed: 04/22/2009 JTS Box Number Date Printed: 04/22/2009 JTS Box Number: lFES 67 Tab Number: 128 Document Title: Listener Document Date: Oct-93 Document Country: New Zealand Document Language: English lFES 10: CE01226 .. • '" '- VIEWPOI:\T , • Listener Volume 140 No 27921SSN 0110 5787 Edilori(ll Editor. Te"" Snow Assistant Editor. Paul Linle MMP: THE WAY TO GO Arts and Books Editor. Chns Bourke he decision to put the conformisl party votes in Chle1 Subeditor. Tom ~cWiliiams case for ~IMP. which Parliament. on the grounds Art DIrector: ~1ichacl McHugh Production Manager. Roger Spragg this issue of the maga­ that Ihe public "find it less Photographic libra,." Tordis Mackey Tzine does, was nol and less credible that Ihe Business Manager. Karen ~orath taken lightly. It coincides members of a political pany Adverlising with the conclusion of can somehow agree on their AUCKWD (09)623 1DD2 t~e 1986 Report of the approach to absolutely fa< 1091623 1011 Royal Commission on Ihe everYlhing". When Ihe Address: PO Bo~ 7. Auckland I National Advertising Manager. Trish Tumey Electoral System - subtitled broad department-slOre Deputy Manager. Suzanne Johnston importantly "Towards a approach 10 retailing or the Co-ordinator: Ena Cashmore Better Democracy". The catch-all cOf]lorate business TERRY SNOW WEWNGTON (04) 385 3310 opening words state; "This are both giving way to mOre f'" 1041382 8003 Edi.or Account Executive: Eileen Thompson report is about our demo­ focused. specialist stores Ot'erseas Adl'ertising .. tgenu cracy. It is about the way New Zealanders and business functions. and to more choice Mclean Media. PO Box. 5+1.. Newtown. NSW. give their consent to the ex.ercise by for the public. there is no reason why sever­ 2042. Australia Parliament and the Government of great al. more focused. smaller polilical parties (street address: 64 Slation SU'eet) public power." This declaration should be shouldn't offer a similar variety in Ihe -' (ph 0061 25196455: flU 006125571614) remembered as the cont ..t in which the marketplace of universal suffrage. It·s Universal Media Corporation. CPO Box. 46. commission ultimately recommended Mixed called competition in a free-enterprise Tokyo. Japan Iph 0081 3 3666 3036: Member Proponional (MMP) as the most society. Nobody has declared the free mar- fax 0081 3 3666 3(94). desirable electoral system. It was concerned · ket in pOlitical choice. ideas and philoso­ Subscripliom with "our" dem"!'racy. not the democracy of phies closed. And just as varied businesses Save 15 percent on the cover price. 12 mOnlhs. $95; 6 monlhs. $48.50. a panicular lobby group or political persua­ can co-exist profitably and even find a Overseas rates on request. sion and it was concerned about the way · community of interest within industry or SubSCription Service "New Zealanders" in general give their con­ · retail groupings. modern political parties F",epost 3310 PO Bo. 100-741 sent. not some or a few, and not simply the : should be able to find similarly productive Nonh Shore Mail Centre Auckland to ph 109) 443 0238 powerful or those close to them. : coalitions of interest. f.. I09) 443 0249 Recently a newspaper columnist assened Nor should there be any fears that a bet­ Circulation and Promotions Manager. that "a vote for MMP is a vote for irrespon­ ter democracy is worse for business. The Nigel Whyte ph (09) 638 8105 sible government". That's not only a slur more the politicians keep their tingers Out Submissions on the depth of considerations undenaken of business. the more business will be able Contributed anicles and letters should be addressed to the Editor. For rerum of by the Royal Commission. but it is illo­ to prosper according 10 the well- manuscripts JOOI leners) please include a gical. People vote. The responsible or irre­ · founded principles that are commercial swnped addressed envelope. PO 80. 7, Auckland 1 sponsible nature of government is then in rather than political. The problem is rather the hands of the elected politicians. Stable that some businesses wan I 10 keep Iheir Head office or unstable government. similarly, is in the fingers in politics. 360 Dominion Road. Mt Eden. Auckland 3 hands of those who are in government. This The details of the vinues of ~IMP and its Auckland 109) 623 1002 kind of damning statement is like a lot of workings are covered in the anicles in this f.. : 109) 623 1011 magazine. For those who ta\'our the e;~ist­ Address: PO Box 7. AuckJand the electoral bullying and victim blaming W.IIinBlon .di.oriol office that goes on ( ... if you go walking at night. ing system. or who preierred Ihe Single Commercial Union House. 142 Featherston St you will to be blame if an attacker assaults , Transferable Vote (STV) IO Ihe referen­ ph (04) 499 2712; fall (04) 499 2683 you ... ). Whatever happened to the cenain dum. there will be much 10 debate. But Sou.h 1.land .diloriol responsibility Ihat falls on the attacker in , there is an essential underl~ 109 principle 10 Bruce Ansley ph (03) 329 4451: f.. 103) 329 4451 crime. or the politician in power? : consider. New Zealand' s present vOlino Group Advertising Manager. Wendy Blo.ham Simon Upton. a symbolic voice for both system has serious defictenclI:S - as the Publlsller. Gr.tham Billings major panies' desire to retain the present commission found. "The process of choice The Lisltntr is registered as a newspaper and voting system. raised the spectre of frag­ should to the fullest e"ent possible give published by New Zealand Listener t 1990) mented. special-interest panies when he put · each member of the eommun"y an equal Limited. The registered office is at 46 Alben the case for the eXisting broad-spectrum , pan in the choice of the Guvernment and a Street. Auckland. The contents of the Listtntr are copyright and may not be reproduced in any fonn panies in a speech at Canterbury University · fair opportunity to parlt<'pale in Ihe without tlte written permission of the publisher. in Augusl. Yet. with masterly self­ process," In the choice (acing us ne.'~.t Printed by Webprint Colour Ltd. a division of contradiction. he also advocated the rel .. - month. MMP is the one Ihal u ifers mOre Wilson & Honan. ation of the pany whip system that ensures Voters a fair go. • MP~£~ OCTOBER 4 191.)) Lbll"nrr .. to ur current electoral system they put up a has-been. J hack or J drover's the opposition. But II '.'-'ouid ha .... e made ,t prOlects the powerful. There dog in most seats. And that is the end of the impossible for anyone to accuse the ~\~\P are 20 ministers in the cur· voters' role. under FPP. pany lists of being undemocratic. However. rent Cabinet. and five more Under MMP. however. voters have more . even the closed pany list still produces a outside Cabinet. The seats of power. If a pany stacks its list with hacks. : more democratic election result than that every one of those 25 minis­ it can be punished in the pany vote. This , delivered by FPP. The public can. and will. ters lie outside the massive sends a direct message to the pany bosses. , let the parties know if the lists are not up to 6.1 percent nationwide swing It tells them what kind of candidates they , scratch. needs to win this year's elec­ should put on the list if they want to attract • Myth 2: MMP creates bigger alectorates tion. Clearly. our current voting system suppon. Why is this crucial? Under MMP. that will make It harder to hall contact makes it extremely hard to shift the govern­ it is the narionwide pattern of the party with Mh. The simple fact is that the list ing elite. Even in Labours 1990 election vote that decides the election result. MMP MPs will also do electorate work. alongside bloodbath. only a handful of ministers - holds up a mirror to voter sentiment and the colleagues elected in local contests. The Phil Goff. Ralph Maxwell. Annette King adjusts the seats in Parliament to match. pany's image within the electorate demands and Peter Neilson - lost their seats. Under FPP. however. the election hinges that this happen. So why. in the current debate on electoral on the chance outcome that emerges from In fact. under MMP. MPs will need to be reform. is MMP being singled out as the 99 discrete FPP electorate races. That's more responsive to their electorates. Since system open to capture by the pany bosses? how, in 1978 and 1981. National could get everyone's vote - even the vote for the The myths being bandied about in this fewer votes than Labour and still win the opposition in a safe government seat - will year's debate on electoral reform deserve election. now count for the first time in the overall closer scrutiny. MMP is also better for women. The pres­ result. MPs will no longer be able to ignore Myth 1: Under MMP, tile party baaes will sure that the the individuals and pressure groups in their control the party lilts. Party hackl and neck of the woods who suppon opposition has·beens will get on the lists, and will parties. Each has to be wooed now. neyer be able to be remolld. There because their vote will count in the are major safeguards against this pany tallies that decide an elec· happening. The legislation tion. requires that each party use Yes, local electorates will democratic methods to compile be larger - but there will be the party lists. and enables more MPs to work in those them to be sued in the High electorates.
Recommended publications
  • Kiwisaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions
    PolicyP AdviceA DivisionD Treasury Report: KiwiSaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions Date: 21 October 2005 Treasury Priority: High Security Level: IN-CONFIDENCE Report No: T2005/1974, PAD2005/186 Action Sought Action Sought Deadline Minister of Finance Agree to all recommendations 28 October 2005 Refer to Ministers of Education and Housing Minister of Commerce Agree to recommendations r to dd 28 October 2005 Minister of Revenue Agree to recommendations e to q 28 October 2005 Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Phil Goff) Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Trevor Mallard) Associate Minister of Finance Note None (Hon Clayton Cosgrove) Contact for Telephone Discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone 1st Contact Senior Analyst, Markets, Infrastructure 9 and Government, The Treasury Senior Policy Analyst, Regulatory and Competition Policy Branch, MED Michael Nutsford Policy Manager, Inland Revenue Enclosure: No Treasury:775533v1 IN-CONFIDENCE 21 October 2005 SH-13-0-7 Treasury Report: KiwiSaver – Issues for Supplementary Drafting Instructions Executive Summary Officials have provided the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO) with an initial set of drafting instructions on KiwiSaver. However, in preparing these drafting instructions, a range of further issues came to light. We are seeking decisions on these matters now so that officials can provide supplementary drafting instructions to PCO by early November. Officials understand that a meeting may be arranged between Ministers and officials for late next week to discuss the issues contained in this report and on the overall KiwiSaver timeline. A separate report discussing the timeline for KiwiSaver and the work on the taxation of qualifying collective investment vehicles will be provided to you early next week.
    [Show full text]
  • 'About Turn': an Analysis of the Causes of the New Zealand Labour Party's
    Newcastle University e-prints Date deposited: 2nd May 2013 Version of file: Author final Peer Review Status: Peer reviewed Citation for item: Reardon J, Gray TS. About Turn: An Analysis of the Causes of the New Zealand Labour Party's Adoption of Neo-Liberal Policies 1984-1990. Political Quarterly 2007, 78(3), 447-455. Further information on publisher website: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Publisher’s copyright statement: The definitive version is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00872.x Always use the definitive version when citing. Use Policy: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not for profit purposes provided that: A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source A link is made to the metadata record in Newcastle E-prints The full text is not changed in any way. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Robinson Library, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1 7RU. Tel. 0191 222 6000 ‘About turn’: an analysis of the causes of the New Zealand Labour Party’s adoption of neo- liberal economic policies 1984-1990 John Reardon and Tim Gray School of Geography, Politics and Sociology Newcastle University Abstract This is the inside story of one of the most extraordinary about-turns in policy-making undertaken by a democratically elected political party.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Manufacture' of News in Teh 1993 New Zealand General Election
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. The "Manufacture" of News in the New Zealand General Election 1993 A thesis presenteJ in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Human Resource Management at Massey University Judith Helen McGregor 1995 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisors, Associate Professor Fra11k Sligo and Professor Philip Dewe, for their continued support and assistance during the research project. The study would not have been possible without the help of Annette King, the Member of Parliament for Miramar, and the former Labour leader, Mike Moore, who allowed me inside their organizations. Annette King allowed me to use her as an action research "guinea pig" and her enthusiasm for the project motivated me throughout the research. Sue Foley and Paul Jackrnan, Mr Moore's press secretaries, provided valuable feedback and explained the context of much of the election campaign roadshow. Thanks must go, too, to Lloyd Falck, Labour Party strategist and research adviser to the Leader of the Opposition. Piet de Jong, Liz Brook and Alister Browne all helped with the action research in Miramar. Dr Ted Drawneek provided invaluable help with data analysis in the content analysis sections of the research and I acknowledge the secretarial assistance of Christine Smith. I am grateful to John Harvey for his advice about contemporary journalism and for his unstinting encouragement and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones in NZ Sexual Health Compiled by Margaret Sparrow
    MILESTONES IN NEW ZEALAND SEXUAL HEALTH by Dr Margaret Sparrow For The Australasian Sexual Health Conference Christchurch, New Zealand, June 2003 To celebrate The 25th Annual General Meeting of the New Zealand Venereological Society And The 25 years since the inaugural meeting of the Society in Wellington on 4 December 1978 And The 15th anniversary of the incorporation of the Australasian College of Sexual Health Physicians on 23 February 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pg Acknowledgments 3 Foreword 4 Glossary of abbreviations 5 Chapter 1 Chronological Synopsis of World Events 7 Chapter 2 New Zealand: Milestones from 1914 to the Present 11 Chapter 3 Dr Bill Platts MBE (1909-2001) 25 Chapter 4 The New Zealand Venereological Society 28 Chapter 5 The Australasian College 45 Chapter 6 International Links 53 Chapter 7 Health Education and Health Promotion 57 Chapter 8 AIDS: Milestones Reflected in the Media 63 Postscript 69 References 70 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr Ross Philpot has always been a role model in demonstrating through his own publications the importance of historical records. Dr Janet Say was as knowledgeable, helpful and encouraging as ever. I drew especially on her international experience to help with the chapter on our international links. Dr Heather Lyttle, now in Perth, greatly enhanced the chapter on Dr Bill Platts with her personal reminiscences. Dr Gordon Scrimgeour read the chapter on the NZVS and remembered some things I had forgotten. I am grateful to John Boyd who some years ago found a copy of “The Shadow over New Zealand” in a second hand bookstore in Wellington. Dr Craig Young kindly read the first three chapters and made useful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist #4, 2015
    Rail & Maritime Transport Union Volume 2015 # 4 Published Regularly - ISSN 1178-7392 (Print & Online) 17 April 2015 https://www.facebook.com/events/1582054 INAUGURAL WOMEN’S FORUM 735381027/ An RMTU Woman’s Forum is being held in Wellington 21 and 22 April 2015. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS – “This is a major event for the Union as for GENERAL SECRETARY the first time a meeting of RMTU women In accordance with Rule 24 of the Rules from one end of NZ to the other will be in & Standing Orders of the Rail & Maritime Wellington for two days to talk about all Transport Union nominations are hereby issues impacting upon women members of called for the full time position of the Union”. General Secretary. Wayne Butson said “There is an exciting Nomination Forms are available from the lineup of inspiring women speakers from RMTU National Office by contacting Julia overseas and NZ Ports, Police and Women’s on 04-499-2066, fax 04-471-0896 or Refuge to name a few but the most sought [email protected]. after voices at the Forum will be those of our women members”. Nominations shall be in writing and contain the signed consent of the A full report will be published in Issue 2 of candidate, and be proposed and the Transport Worker. seconded by financial members (Rule 1) of the Union. JOIN THE Nominations must PROTEST be received by the National Returning Our friends in Officer at the National Office of the Rail the Greens Party have & Maritime Transport Union, PO Box organised a facebook page and protest 1103 Wellington 6140 no later than event to decry the possible withdrawal of th 1700hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States
    Order Code RL32876 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States Updated June 16, 2005 Bruce Vaughn Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States Summary New Zealand and the United States continue to have strong ties despite some differences. These close ties are based on shared cultural traditions and values. Differences between the United States and New Zealand emerged in the mid 1980s over New Zealand’s policy to ban nuclear armed and nuclear powered ships from its ports. This led to a defacto split between the United States and New Zealand within the context of the Australia-New Zealand-United States (ANZUS) alliance. Despite this issue, New Zealand is a regular contributor to international peace operations and has contributed troops to the war against terror in Afghanistan and to assist reconstruction efforts in Iraq. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Helen Clark, who will likely seek a third term as prime minister in elections that must be held before September 2005, New Zealand is seeking a closer economic relationship with the United States through a free trade agreement (FTA). The United States is New Zealand’s second most important trading partner after Australia. While the overall volume of trade with new Zealand is relatively small, at U.S.$5 billion in 2004, progress on the FTA is viewed as politically significant. In February of 2005, Representatives Jim Kolbe and Ellen Tauscher launched the Friends of New Zealand Congressional Caucus.
    [Show full text]
  • Learn from New Zealand and Japan on Postal Banking
    Learn from New Zealand and Japan on postal banking By Elisa Barwick basic banking ser- With many Australians unable to access adequate bank- vices and loans to ing services, in August the Communications, Electrical and the government. In Plumbing Union of Australia (CEPU), working with the in- 1987 banking opera- dependent think tank Per Capita, proposed that the 6,990 tions were split from Australia Post branches, already used for banking servic- postal functions to es, be transformed into a public bank. This would also form PostBank, but “underpin the ongoing viability of Australia Post’s servic- it was swallowed up es across Australia”, stated the report entitled “Postbank: by ANZ in 1989. Ki- Filling a Void, Securing Essential Services”. wibank was born For a leading union to speak in favour of the nation- in 2002. It provides al bank solution is a big breakthrough. Furthermore, the basic banking ser- proposal is presented in the context of the historical fight vices, home loans, for national banking in Australia through creation of the business loans, and original Commonwealth Bank. This was a fight which took subsidiary compa- on the City of London centred “Money Power”, which we nies provide wealth are right up against again today, with its extension in the management servic- Bank for International Settlements and Financial Stabili- es, insurance and fi- ty Board, which is leading the push for a global “bail-in” nancial services. regime to confiscate people’s savings in order to save the Former New Zealand Deputy Prime Minister Jim An- bankrupt financial system. derton (1938-2018), who left the Labour Party over his “The story of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia opposition to Rogernomics—NZ’s post-1984 neoliberal (CBA) is a dramatic illustration of the enormous potential economic policy named after then-Labour Finance Min- of public banking as well as a warning of the private oppo- ister Roger Douglas—played the pivotal role in winning sition to it”, the Per Capita paper declared.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBALISATION, SOVEREIGNTY and the TRANSFORMATION of NEW ZEALAND FOREIGN POLICY Robert G
    Working Pape Working GLOBALISATION, SOVEREIGNTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF NEW ZEALAND FOREIGN POLICY Robert G. Patman Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand r Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. No.21/05 CENTRE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES NEW ZEALAND Working Papers The Centre for Strategic Studies Working Paper series is designed to give a forum for scholars and specialists working on issues related directly to New Zealand’s security, broadly defined, and to the Asia-Pacific region. The Working Papers represent ‘work in progress’ and as such may be altered and expanded after feedback before being published elsewhere. The opinions expressed and conclusions drawn in the Working Papers are solely those of the writer. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Centre for Strategic Studies or any other organisation with which the writer may be affiliated. For further information or additional copies of the Working Papers please contact: Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington New Zealand. Tel: 64 4 463 5434 Fax: 64 4 463 5737 Email: [email protected] Website: www.vuw.ac.nz/css/ Centre for Strategic Studies Victoria University of Wellington 2005 © Robert G. Patman ISSN 1175-1339 Desktop Design: Synonne Rajanayagam Globalisation, Sovereignty, and the Transformation of New Zealand Foreign Policy Working Paper 21/05 Abstract Structural changes in the global system have raised a big question mark over a traditional working principle of international relations, namely, state sovereignty. With the end of the Cold War and the subsequent break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US has been left as the world’s only superpower.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand: 2020 General Election
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 9034, 26 October 2020 New Zealand: 2020 By Nigel Walker general election Antonia Garraway Contents: 1. Background 2. 2020 General Election www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 New Zealand: 2020 general election Contents Summary 3 1. Background 4 2. 2020 General Election 5 2.1 Political parties 5 2.2 Party leaders 7 2.3 Election campaign 10 2.4 Election results 10 2.5 The 53rd Parliament 11 Cover page image copyright: Jacinda Ardern reopens the Dunedin Courthouse by Ministry of Justice of New Zealand – justice.govt.nz – Wikimedia Commons page. Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 26 October 2020 Summary New Zealand held a General Election on Saturday 17 October 2020, with advance voting beginning two weeks earlier, on 3 October. Originally planned for 19 September, the election was postponed due to Covid-19. As well as electing Members of Parliament, New Zealand’s electorate voted on two referendums: one to decriminalise the recreational use of marijuana; the other to allow some terminally ill people to request assisted dying. The election was commonly dubbed the “Covid election”, with the coronavirus pandemic the main issue for voters throughout the campaign. Jacinda Ardern, the incumbent Prime Minister from the Labour Party, had been widely praised for her handling of the pandemic and the “hard and early” plan introduced by her Government in the early stages. She led in the polls throughout the campaign. Preliminary results from the election show Ms Ardern won a landslide victory, securing 49.1 per cent of the votes and a projected 64 seats in the new (53rd) Parliament: a rare outright parliamentary majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief to Government
    Lumley House 3-11 Hunter Street PO Box 1925 Wellington 6001 Tel: 04 496-6555 Fax: 04 496-6550 www.businessnz.org.nz Rt Hon Helen Clark Prime Minister Hon Ruth Dyson Minister ACC, Labour Hon Lianne Dalziel Minister Commerce, Small Business Hon Judith Tizard Minister Consumer Affairs Hon Trevor Mallard Minister Economic, Industry & Regional Dvpt Hon Steve Maharey Minister Education Hon David Parker Minister Energy, Transport Hon David Benson-Pope Minister Environment Hon Michael Cullen Minister Finance, Tertiary Education Rt Hon Winston Peters Minister Foreign Affairs Hon David Cunliffe Minister Immigration Hon Mark Burton Minister Local Government Hon Peter Dunne Minister Revenue Hon Phil Goff Minister Trade, Trade Negotiations Brief to Government This briefing contains a number of recommendations for which Business NZ seeks your support during the life of this Government: Section 1: Background: economic issues Section 2: Background: desired policy outcomes Section 3: Recommended initial policy outcomes Section 4: About Business NZ Section 2 Desired policy outcomes lists many of the desired outcomes promoted by Business NZ during the last Parliamentary term. They continue to represent the outcomes desired to achieve a business-friendly environment and a growing economy. Section 3 Recommended initial policy outcomes lists potential activity areas that would help lead towards our desired policy outcomes and that may be capable of reaching a successful conclusion over the next 12 – 18 months, given the makeup of the Government and Parliament. These are issues where a positive start can be made, and on which we hope to engage with you in constructive dialogue. Please accept my best wishes for this Parliamentary term.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Meningococcal Vaccine Strategy
    CASE PROGRAM 2006.18.2 New Zealand’s Meningococcal Vaccine Strategy (B- Epilogue) On 17 May, Meningococcal Vaccine Strategy (MVS) director Jane O’Hallahan set a new possible pilot roll out date for the MeNZB vaccine of 2 August 2004, with November 2004 dates for roll outs in Northland, Auckland and Waitemata District Health Boards.1 Medsafe had compiled 55 additional questions to be answered about aspects of the data provided on safety and efficacy of the vaccine. These were ultimately resolved in a series of teleconferences between Medsafe and experts from regulatory and technical agencies in the United Kingdom. By then, however, the June edition of New Zealand Doctor magazine suggested the MVS had miscalculated and was at risk of wasting thousands of dollars by ordering the first batch of vaccine so early that it would have expired before it could be licensed. On 27 June 2004, the front page of the New Zealand Herald featured a picture of six month-old Charlotte Cleverley-Bisman, taken before she became one of the most recent meningococcal victims. Under the headline “Disease Ravages a Perfect Angel: a couple pleads for a vaccine to be made available urgently to combat a deadly epidemic,” it went on to describe how she was facing amputations to her legs and arms. This case was written by Janet Tyson, Australia and New Zealand School of Government, under the supervision of Dr Richard Norman, and with assistance from Professor Claudia Scott and Dr Karen Baehler, Victoria University of Wellington. It is a sequel, prepared for teaching purposes, to case 2006-18.1.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States
    New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States Bruce Vaughn Specialist in Asian Affairs May 27, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32876 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States Summary New Zealand is increasingly viewed as a stalwart partner of the United States that welcomes U.S. presence in its region. New Zealand and the United States enjoy very close bilateral ties across the spectrum of relations between the two countries. These ties are based on shared cultural traditions and values as well as on common interests. New Zealand is a stable and active democracy with a focus on liberalizing trade in the Asia-Pacific region. New Zealand also has a history of fighting alongside the United States in most of its major conflicts including World War I, World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. New Zealand is a regular contributor to international peace and stability operations and has contributed troops to the struggle against militant Islamists in Afghanistan, where it has a Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Bamiyan Province. The bilateral relationship between the United States and New Zealand was strengthened significantly through the signing of the Wellington Declaration in November 2010. At that time, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and New Zealand Prime Minister John Key signaled that past differences over nuclear policy have been set aside as the two described the relationship as the strongest and most productive it has been in 25 years. In the mid-1980s New Zealand adopted a still-in-effect policy of not allowing nuclear armed or nuclear powered ships to visit New Zealand ports.
    [Show full text]